TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Distracted Boyfriend meme is sexist, rules Swedish ad watchdog

perplexedm

September 26, 2018
87 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/sep/26/distracted-boyfriend-meme-sexist-swedish-advertising
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Distracted Boyfriend meme is sexist, rules Swedish ad watchdog
Author

perplexedm

Upvotes 87
Comments 20
Date September 26, 2018 10:29 AM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9j1a87/distracted_boyfriend_meme_is_sexist_rules_swedish/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/distracted-boyfriend-meme-is-sexist-rules-swedish.893332
https://theredarchive.com/post/893332
Top posts by perplexedm

Women upset because they are temporarily banned from FaceBook for calling men 'scum'.

3661 upvotes
December 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

If you say “mansplaining” to me in a conversation you will lose all credibility with me and I will 100% call you out on it.

3442 upvotes
March 17, 2019
/r/MensRights

Being “creepy” is an inevitable part of young men learning to speak to women they’re interested in. Young men shouldn’t allow women who’ve never had to be the pursuer shame them for trying and not being perfect at it on their first tries.

2879 upvotes
January 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

The other side of 'toxic masculinity' in California shooting

2627 upvotes
November 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Geoffrey Rush wins $1.9m payout on #MeToo defamation case

2465 upvotes
July 6, 2019
/r/MensRights

Male Feminist commits suicide after Feminist falsely accuses him during Women's March

2430 upvotes
January 2, 2019
/r/MensRights

The fact that men’s issues are largely (or entirely) ignored by the body positivity movement shows it’s mainly about overweight women wanting to be victims

2102 upvotes
December 7, 2019
/r/MensRights

If Kevin Hart is ostracized into not hosting the Oscars, Amy Schumer, a self-proclaimed rapist should not be able to co-host either.

1979 upvotes
February 25, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]perplexedm[S] 42 points43 points44 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It also shows degrading stereotypical gender roles of both men and women and gives the impression men can change female partners as they change jobs.”

Blame it on men, problem solved!

[–]tenchineuro 20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It also shows degrading stereotypical gender roles of both men and women and gives the impression men can change female partners as they change jobs.”

Wait, women can do this, why would it be a problem if men did it?

[–]perplexedm[S] 19 points20 points21 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

When men do it, that is misogyny and a crime, duh! /s

[–]andejoh 14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

gives the impression men can change female partners

Shouldn't they be able to? Nobody owes you a relationship and consent can be withdrawn at any time.

[–]Throwawayingaccount 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Change female partner like changing a job? So with endless interviews, trying for months without getting any responses, and then figuring out that the best way is to just lie about yourself? Sounds accurate

[–]bubby963 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

gives the impression men can change female partners as they change jobs

Hey these same people say "you arent entitled to sex from women" whilst simultaneously believing women are entitled to have men stay in relationships with them

[–]Rudi150594 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, about a year ago, one of the admins of a local university math Facebook group posted this meme in that group * and some people complained about it heavily, stating they find it sexist because it objectifies women. They insulted everyone who disagreed with them, made sneak edits to their posts after getting replies, added replies after locking their own thread and blamed sexist men for making women in academia uncomfortable.

(Due to the tone of the offended woman that started it all and kept replying, that admin defended himself and out of spite didn't delete the post. But now they're probably much more careful about not offending anyone...)

Some argued that it's just a joke and others that if it it's sexist it's sexist towards men because men are portrayed as dumb / not trustworthy / always horny, but of course they continued ranting about it.

What do you think, can jokes be discriminatory? Or would it be more discriminatory if we refrained from making jokes at the expense of groups that get offended by it, because it makes these groups more invisible in comedy? Should stereotypes really not be allowed to be joked about because they reinforce them?

* The guy was "(a + b)2 ", his girlfriend "a2 + 2ab + b2 " and the girl passing by was "a2 + b2 ", making fun of a common mistake in maths.

[–]perplexedm[S] 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is a meme, a joke, should only be taken in that spirit as far as my idea goes.

It portrays men in bad light more than women.

Now, if someone looks it through yellow glasses of identity politics...

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

stating they find it sexist because it objectifies women

Wouldn't it be implying that the guy in the picture is objectifying them? Unless the joke is endorsing it, then the joke itself wouldn't be.

Of course, this presuming that being physically attracted to someone is objectifying them, in which case objectification is a non-issue.

[–]andejoh 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wouldn't it be implying that the guy in the picture is objectifying them?

Why would we believe that? I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that every one who looks at the picture has proscribe (read in) intent based on their own biases and world view. For all we know, he thought he knew her and his girl friend is a controlling, jealous, bitch.

Isn't that the point of art to make people think? Why did people jump to that interpretation?

[–]thrway_1000 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Archive -- https://archive.is/5qVpF

[–]betadan 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So is this also sexist?

https://goo.gl/images/bWAVbH

[–]perplexedm[S] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There, there! why that man is restraining that women! Controlling toxic misogynist men ! /s

[–]Maito_Guy 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The slightest expression of male sexuality is disgusting and sexist didn't you know? Perving over male window cleaners whilst they enjoy a nice diet coke or peeping at a man getting changed and applying aftershave from behind a two sided mirror is perfectly fine however.

[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Censorship, disguisting.

[–]perplexedm[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The Swedish advertising industry is self-regulating, meaning that the ombudsman can criticise ads but it does not have the power to impose sanctions.

Don't know what exactly this mean in Swedish context.

[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It means that advertizer can't be punished or forced to remove the ads, which is good, it means these the advertizers can tell these idiots to go fuck their hats.

[–]antilopes 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't agree with the watchdog's reasoning. There are other issues one could mention but they are just a reflection of our society not a reason to complain about the ad.

It would help if someone makes some gender-flipped examples for comparison. If they can't be made exactly symmetrical, that is worth thinking about.

I'd be looking at how ready we are to identify with the distracted party, who in the advert is the jobseeker.

[–]perplexedm[S] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It would help if someone makes some gender-flipped examples for comparison.

As user u/betadan pointed out: https://goo.gl/images/bWAVbH

[–]antilopes 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks. I can see something like that working in the job advert. I really don't see sexism.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter