Apologies if this is something that’s been discussed in length, but there’s something I’d like to get everyone’s opinion on. That being the potential of overlapping ideas between red pill think and feminism. The classic narrative of course is that these are opposing sides, and in many ways that’s true, but aren’t there a lot of areas where the two ideologies converge? Especially when it comes to sexuality and promiscuity?

Both groups seem to think of marriage and monogamy as a trap, with feminists claiming that it’s a patriarchal structure meant to control women’s sexuality, while men view it as only suitable for beta males. A trap meant to bleed alphas dry and reduce them to a husk of their former selves. Robbing them of their agency. The reality of course might be that it’s both. That both sides are starting to realize these institutions as a sham. Simply a way for beta desperate males to try and control women, which both strengthens the patriarchy (in the feminist view) and ultimately bites said men in the ass (in the MRA view).

For that reason is it reasonable to believe that both have come to the same conclusion in regards to monogamy? That hypergamy is a natural phenomenon, and that both men and women are meant to perpetually live in a state of sexual promiscuity? That men only want to control women either for child rearing or fear of not being able to find another mate, and that women only want to control men for resources while it’s convenient for them? Both are cynical views that believe the notion of love is a construct that only benefits the desperate.