According to feminist, male rape victims should be forced to pay child support. Bonus hypocrisy: also believes young boys raped by female teachers aren't real victims of sexual abuse

Greg_W_Allan · 2017-12-09T08:35:53+00:00

He was thirteen and sleeping over at a mate's place. Mate's drunken mother enters room after midnight, climbs aboard visitor's nocturnal erection and conceives. Thirteen year old IS woken but is terrified and pretends sleep. Afterwards he is violently ill.

Woman bears child. A year after her bit of drunken fun she's accosting him on the way to school and extorting his lunch money with threats of spreading rumours about him. When he turns sixteen he starts getting a government youth allowance. Government garnishes allowance and gives to guess who. She didn't need to accost or extort him any more. Our feds would do it for her.

This DID happen.

novice_at_life · 2017-12-09T08:21:50+00:00

So then, I'm sure, he's also in support of male rapists being granted visitation rights and even joint custody of children born from rape, right? Because that's obviously in the best interests of the child and should be kept separate from the issue of how the child came to exist, right? Of course he would

-manatease · 2017-12-09T10:57:55+00:00

It's a crazy argument - the thing is that men are sent to prison whilst women walk free or serve much less time for the same crime, with the baby itself used as part of the excuse. So the $47.5k per year saved can be used for child support.

Considering a lot of the victims are children themselves they can't pay much child support, one year would cover it for the life of the other child. There often being the best interests of two children to think about.

mwobuddy · 2017-12-09T07:51:39+00:00

Oh hey, its like suffragettes of 1860 never left us!

TheDongerNeedsFood · 2017-12-09T19:18:15+00:00

The author of that post is truly a piece of shit. The way he puts quotation marks around the word “victim” when describing statutory rape when it is the male that is underage is truly infuriating. Fucktards like him would never do that in a situation where the female was the one who was underage

Dmva100 · 2017-12-09T13:14:57+00:00

The goal of over broadening the definition of sexual assault, is to ruin the reputations of men to keep them from obtaining high status positions in the workplace, politics etc., or removing them from such positions.

This is especially true on college campuses. If a girl tells a college counselor a guy looked at her the wrong way, they can suspend him, tarnish his record before he can graduate , and he won't get that STEM job he was going for, and that position just MIGHT be available for the women now!

If women can't use the pleasure of sex to sway the men of power, they will instead use it as a badge of victimhood to tear them down, true or not. The women who shame anyone who dare question something 'awful' as unwanted sexual advances, contact, etc. are those who fear the loss of power from such accusations. Odds are those women are ham planets that cannot secure the men they want. The men who stand behind the women on such issues are just beta cucks looking for a whiff of poon by conforming to feminist propaganda and being PC.

We are seeing a change in how sex is used for power. The less incentive for men to commit to women (marriage) the more incentive women will have to use sex as a reputation destruction tool as an effort to weaponize sex by using the law in a different way. Choose committment and or marriage for legal provisioning for your woman, or go to jail and lose everything you work for in your life that you refuse to give to women

2017-12-09T22:04:45+00:00

"There's a child involved."

Yes, and that child can receive government assistance if they need it. You don't have to further violate a rape victim to take care of a kid.

Blutarg · 2017-12-09T16:42:56+00:00

What a jagoff.

PlastIconoclastic · 2017-12-09T20:43:15+00:00

Why would a rapist have custody of a child?

44th_King · 2017-12-09T20:21:32+00:00

If the genders were flipped what would here reaction be?

H-4350 · 2017-12-10T06:20:11+00:00

He's awfully concerned about the child born of rape. Too bad he doesn't feel the same about the child that was raped.

hobdobgumball · 2017-12-09T21:48:13+00:00

Well, many boys who have sex with female teachers are not abuse victims. And to a lesser extent, some girls are not victims of male teachers. It all depends where the kid is emotionally. But the key is that few are ready emotionally, so that’s why it’s not cool to do.

William__F0ster · 2017-12-09T09:50:25+00:00

He nowhere states that he's a feminist in that answer to the question.

He also says this:

Child support is awarded by the state in order to provide for a child. The circumstances surrounding how the child was brought into this world are irrelevant when determining child support.

That line of reasoning is both quite Conservative/Libertarian as he sees the actors as responsible, not the state, and that if he believes that about child support I am willing to bet he is Pro-life too.

Neither of which are positions that would sit with a feminist - which as I've pointed out is not something he appears to identify himself as anywhere that I could see.

Edit (1)

Downvote me all you want you fucking gaylord - you're just proving the point.

Edit (2)

I notice that not one of you fucks down voting this has actually been able to point out where it says he is a feminist in that article or show that he's not using Conservative/Libertarian leaning arguments to back up his case.

Is he a feminist or not?

And if he is, how do you know?

Or have you just all decided to copy feminists themselves by labelling any argument you don't like as 'Feminist' in the same way they label any argument they don't like as MRA?

Comments