The 'One in Three' claim about male domestic violence victims is a myth: " Nor should anyone suggest that it is an excuse to ignore male victims – where they are in need of assistance it should absolutely be available to them.": By which, this editorial means almost never.

2016-08-22T13:09:17+00:00

These people aren't just stupid, they are evil.

It's known from hundreds of studies that women are at least as violent as men in relationships. It's been known for decades.

There are several statistics that show that lesbian relationships are more violent than straight ones .

It's been known for decades that men don't get the help they need inn violent relationships.

Even talking about violence against children has been silenced by these people when it's done by the more likely sex: women.

But they have decided to disregard those facts - for decades - because they love to hate.

Pure evil.

Consilio_et_Animis · 2016-08-22T14:05:33+00:00

Suddenly, when the stats are against their narrative, the research is analysed in minute detail for exactly what it says and what questions were asked etc.

Hmmmmm.... Waiting for them to do the same for the "wage gap" and "1 in 5" women are sexually assaulted at college. But don't hold your breath.

Wisemanner · 2016-08-22T18:57:51+00:00

Look up the Michael Flood mentioned in the article. He is a virulent feminist and mangina. Nothing he comes up with should be trusted.

kaykayton99 · 2016-08-23T05:15:46+00:00

What's interesting is that the author doesn't cite evidence that disputes the 1/3 statistic, she only cites incompleteness in the study. That incompleteness could hide any kind of reality. Her assumption that the areas in which there is no information are positive refututations of the information that does exist is wholly unjustified.

splodgenessabounds · 2016-08-23T09:33:06+00:00

This is in 'Daily Life', the section in which Failrfax Media gives up any pretence of treating men as human beings. Daily Life (and Fairfax) is the "safe space" that helped gestate Clementine Ford.

That's really all the context you need.

Comments