The Council of Europe recently recommended a ban on non-medical circumcision: http://forward.com/news/breaking-news/321959/council-of-europe-recommends-circumcision-ban-unless-performed-by-person-wi/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Main

The relevant text says:

As far as circumcision of young boys is concerned, the Assembly refers to its Resolution 1952 (2013) on children’s right to physical integrity and, out of a concern to protect children’s rights which the Jewish and Muslim communities surely share, recommends that member States provide for ritual circumcision of children not to be allowed [emphasis added] unless practised by a person with the requisite training and skill, in appropriate medical and health conditions. Furthermore, the parents must be duly informed of any potential medical risk or possible contraindications and take these into account when deciding what is best for their child, bearing in mind that the child’s interest must be considered the first priority [emphasis added].

http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=22199&lang=en

Their other resolution that they referred to says in part:

The Parliamentary Assembly is particularly worried about a category of violation of the physical integrity of children, which supporters of the procedures tend to present as beneficial to the children themselves despite clear evidence to the contrary [emphasis added]. This includes, among others, female genital mutilation, the circumcision of young boys for religious reasons, early childhood medical interventions in the case of intersex children, and the submission to, or coercion of, children into piercings, tattoos or plastic surgery."

http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=20174&lang=en

Psychology Today ran a series on this topic:

http://www.savingsons.org/2011/10/psychology-today-circumcision-series.html