This is in response to the recent influx of people questioning the pills in this sub and online in general. I expect this post will be unpopular, but I am ready for flaming.

While I generally think that interpreting data is a reliable way to learn, there is a cohort of toxic inkwells that seeks to undermine the intellectual honesty required to properly parse data. So when I refer to "inkwells," I am hereafter not referring to lonely guys who just have a shitty life and are trying to get by.

But if inkwells didn't talk so much about conspiracy theories like the "small hat tribe" brainwashing the "goyim" with interracial porn, the dogpill (a twisted theory whereby most women apparently want to fuck dogs more than average men), and the lesbianpill (another theory whereby most women want to fuck other women more than average men), I really believe they would be at the forefront of raising awareness about social inequality.

Manosphere grifters like Andrew Tate are starting to rehash old blackpill talking points like locationmaxxing and worldwide online hypergamy as if they discovered it themselves, but they are repackaging it as "self-improvement." That's because they know about optics and marketing, which these inkwells don't. This is why said inkwells get no credit for those points even though they were talking about them a decade ago.

Here I will define the blackpill as: genetic determinism and luck rule every aspect of your life and are more important than hard work in isolation.

The truth is, reality never misses regardless of who's peddling it or spewing it angrily.

The messenger does not matter to the truth.

Scientific studies with large sample sizes and hard empirical data will win the day eventually. A man's neurotypicality, face, race, and height are the biggest predictors of his dating success, not things like "personality" or "confidence" which have no bearing on initial romantic attraction. I have outlined many studies on this topic in my previous posts.

But inkwells, who apparently want normies to understand them, can't really blame the normies for not taking the blackpill when the hateful and delusional inkwells in particular mix the blackpill with conspiracy theories that are anathema to cultural sensibilities on top of being unsupported by data.

Destroying the just-world theory and calling into harsh scrutiny survivorship bias and the apex fallacy is already like shooting Santa Claus to these normies.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Examples:

Just world theory: "Everyone will make it if they just try because everyone has an equal chance."

Survivorship bias: "Look, poor kid, Barack Obama made his way out of poverty to become the first black president, so you can do it too."

Apex fallacy: "All men are privileged over all women, just look at Bill Gates and Elon Musk."

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But at least the blackpill is in large part backed by science. It's not so easy for the offended to object in good faith unless they have a scapegoat. If inkwells were intellectually honest and consistently shot the shit straight, I truly believe they would place society into a serious place of reckoning (assuming mainstream society has a modicum of intellectual honesty).

Why? Because blackpill is the ultimate intersectional entity. Left wingers should be gobbling it up.

"Just trust the science bro."

Lookism, sexism, racism, the halo effect, every form of social stratification, misogyny, misandry, basement dwellers, weebs, furries, the socially-outcast in general, and most other kinds of systemic oppression can all be explained at least in part by the blackpill.

But now dogmatic inkwells can't even justify these findings because their mixing conspiracy theories with no proof into the blackpill gives the normies a scapegoat to focus on.

Personal note:

It also ruins it for people like me, who self-improved from obesity and chronic depression into a 6-pack and a good face as a 5'7 Asian autistic guy.

But if I bring up even a hint of my struggles concerning autism or my race (especially since COVID), all I hear is "man, you sound like an inkwell, are you a snow nationalist Trump supporter too?" I find this very funny because I'm not even white, for starters.

But a combination of stupid normies and conspiracycels ruined it for failed normies and truecels.

Meanwhile, most normies will endlessly praise someone who just recovered from destructive alcoholism or had gender-affirming surgery.

I am not against supporting people in drug/alcohol rehab, but social ostracization due to autism and being openly and repeatedly called a ch*nk and a "COVID spreader" weren't choices I could ever have any direct influence on, unlike drugs and alcohol.

I am also not against supporting gender-affirming surgery, but there is no "autism-affirming" procedure that exists. Maybe if I got a lobotomy.

The cognitive dissonance is baffling.