TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Rational Male
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Interesting…

Stradivarius69

December 18, 2021
321 upvotes
/r/AntiFeminists
https://i.imgur.com/7387gnm.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Interesting…
Author

Stradivarius69

Upvotes 321
Comments 77
Date December 18, 2021 3:01 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/AntiFeminists
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/antifeminists/comments/rj98d2/interesting/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AntiFeminists/interesting.1091817
https://theredarchive.com/post/1091817
Top posts by Stradivarius69

Why is is that this stereotype is always perpetuated by those that have the most to lose from it?

165 upvotes
December 4, 2021
/r/AntiFeminists

Also interesting…

17 upvotes
December 18, 2021
/r/AntiFeminists

Comments

[–]typrip 47 points48 points49 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I like this. Just presenting interesting data without any conclusions drawn from it yet. Its curious what first instinctly think and then use logic to verify it.

[–]DIES-_-IRAE 35 points36 points37 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Observe my total lack of surprise.

[–]Indigostorm27 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hahahahahaha

[–]Fractaroth 30 points31 points32 points 4 years ago (19 children) | Copy Link

Similar subreddits to r/antifeminists by user overlap

127.56 mensrights

63.85 mgtow

52.00 pussypassdenied

32.62 socialjusticeinaction

28.27 trueunpopularopinion

26.61 nicegirls

24.56 jordanpeterson

22.24 purplepilldebate

17.04 tumblrinaction

16.16 shitpoliticssays

15.82 centrist

15.25 religion

14.00 walkaway

11.52 theleftcantmeme

11.25 noahgettheboat

10.57 politicalcompass

10.42 pointlesslygendered

10.19 survivinginfidelity

9.78 prolife

[–]WiseWolf58 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I thought mgtow was banned, not that I used to be a member there.

Also the list is actually quite based.

[–]Starship_Captain01 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoa, I didn't know they got banned. It must have been recent.

They are banned for "promoting hate", yet FDS is not...

[–]xAV96x 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

r/wgtow ain't banned

[–]sneakpeekbot[🍰] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Here's a sneak peek of /r/wgtow using the top posts of the year!

#1: Goals | 12 comments
#2: Being single by choice has lots of pros! | 20 comments
#3: Love stories about the cool aunt | 2 comments


I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact | Info | Opt-out | Source

[–]Fractaroth 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're right, it seems like banned subreddits still show up.

MGTOW is in my opinion the only one that has some cringefactor to it, otherwise pretty based.

[+]WiseWolf58 -17 points-16 points-15 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Not some cringefactor, it was filled with actual losers

[–]Abstract_Knight 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no sub on reddit that has no losers.

[–]_Final-Judgement_ 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ever since the MGTOW ban a lot of members came her and have been ratioed or banned.

[–]nightreaper__ 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I've literally never heard most of these, any good ones in there?

[–]Fractaroth 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pussypassdenied is pretty fun, mostly videos of chicks starting fights with duded and then getting slapped to hell and back,

[–]KlutzySole9-1 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Noahgettheboat is p good

[–]Winternacht- 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r/SocialJusticeInAction is a good sub. I'm also active on r/PoliticalCompass and r/prolife so I'd recommend them as well.

[–]whittlingman 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ewww r/prolife, r/centrists, r/theleftcantmeme

We need some more economic leftists who don’t support mens rights on here.

Supporting MedicareForAll and a livable minimum wage doesn’t preclude someone from being anti-feminist (modern fourth wave feminism).

[+]Inevitable-1 -10 points-9 points-8 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Most of these are…pretty saddening to say the least. I don’t look in the comments here much but I’d assume we were a logical bunch of egalitarians. Not so much by the looks of this list.

[–]SsoulBlade 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

At least you have the brains to see it. But FDS?

[–]Inevitable-1 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I’m sorry, FDS?

[–]SsoulBlade 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I mean you are capable of seeing the issue of the sub. But subscribers of FDS (Female dating strategy) not

[–]Inevitable-1 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, they’re fucking crazy over there. I can’t really criticize the other subs on their list as I know nothing about them.

[–]Futureman999 22 points23 points24 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Angry post-wallers, got it

[–]Rol9x 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You made me spill my tea. 🤣

[–]Futureman999 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

...

[–]RockmanXX 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men of all Ages: Welcome to the world of indifference.

[–]Rol9x 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

If any girl needs THAT survival guide... I don't think she will actually survive.

[–]YouthfulCommerce 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

wtf are they trying to "survive" anyways lmao. They are living life in easy mode

[–]Rol9x 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminism.

[–]TheMiningD -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What makes you think that we are living life on easy mode?

[–]Affectionate_Day2454 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

men think the fact that we can get laid easily means we’re living life on “easy mode” lol… they’d be shocked to find out we seek out more than just sex

[–]Remarkable_Weather21 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

you have right to abort you do not have to go military and lots of other stuff in my country women raping men doesn't even count as rape legally and we have thing called positive discrimination and lots of politicians and people who have political power fallows that so i dunno looks like kind of easier mode if not easy

[–]TheMiningD 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

> you have right to abort
have you seen the media lately? anti abortion rules in texas and all over the place, and a massive rise in the 'pro-lifer' movement

> women raping men doesn't even count as rape legally
in most first world legal documents rape is described as "the crime of forcing another person to have sexual intercourse with the offender against their will." can be male or female

> positive discrimination
sure but that doesnt make up for the gender pay gap (which in Australia where I live is 14.2%), and occupational sexism.

> lots of politicians
ah yes, like the 0 american female presidents, the 1 american female female vice president, and the 26 female heads of state internationally. In fact, it will take 130 years for true gender equality in politics at the rate we are currently going.

Listen, I don't want to kill or men or start a riot. I just want to be paid the same. I just want to walk alone at night. I just want to not have to cover my drink every time I go to a bar. It isn't that hard.

[–]Remarkable_Weather21 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I just want to not have to cover my drink every time I go to a bar. It isn't that hard.

That's not about your rights and being careful is your resposibilty and every me. Does the same aswell if you want to be safe just don't drink outside at all for your own good and others since you will likely falsly accuse them

I just want to be paid the same

Learn how to fucking negatioate and if you have the same perfonmance like men whytf would any profesional hire men ever

Women vote for men aswell it's just democritical outcome

positive discrimination sure but that doesnt make up for the gender pay gap (which in Australia where I live is 14.2%), and occupational sexism.

There are scolarships there are bank credits with low interest just for women in my country

legally in most first world legal documents rape is described as "the crime of forcing another person to have sexual intercourse with the offender against their will." can be male or female

You are wrong it is forced penetration read the fucking laws then talk

you have right to abort have you seen the media lately? anti abortion rules in texas and all over the place, and a massive rise in the 'pro-lifer' movement

Just fucking change the states or country you are in then abort + as if men had any option at all now it is more feminist since you GenJfözöDer equALİtyreeeeee

[–]tomppabeat -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Not gonna get into this argument but I think it’s fucking hilarious that you want people to move whole states or countries just to have the right to abort. You got a good chuckle out of me, thanks.

[–]Remarkable_Weather21 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So you still have more options than man do what's the problem and i was not fucking joking

[–]tomppabeat -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You weren’t joking? That’s even funnier.

[–]WikiSummarizerBot -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Occupational sexism

Occupational sexism (also called sexism in the work place and employment sexism) is discrimination based on a person's sex that occurs in a place of employment.

[ F.A.Q | Opt Out | Opt Out Of Subreddit | GitHub ] Downvote to remove | v1.5

[–]sausage4mash 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Chad not interested in the over 30's then oh well zero fucks given

[–]Rebekfast23 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sorry I’m dumb lol what does this mean?

[–]OG_walrus 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah they've polluted ppd. It used to be so much better before they started spreading their toxic shitty bullshit ideology. They're as bad as incels.

[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

PPD was an olive branch created by MRAs, it was only a matter of time it got overrun by dyed in period blood hair feminists.

[+]manicraccoon -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

thegirlsurvivalguide is good though

Edit: I don't mind being down voted but I don't know what am I being down voted for?

[–][deleted] 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]manicraccoon 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not at all claiming that. Just wanted to point out that it is not related to dating. Which I can now see that I did poorly. Plus I do frequent thegirlsurvivalguide.

[–]mcove97 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Shows that it's a lot of women that struggle with dating.

[–]Yowazzuplol 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shows that it's a lot of older women that struggle with dating.

[+]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto -34 points-33 points-32 points 4 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

No woman should be dating if she's over 30 or 40. She's waaaay past her prime.

[–]soupcanfam 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

My mom (she was a widow) got married again in her late thirties and had me and my siblings in her forties. When my dad married her, my grandpa who’s a serious man said “don’t you mess this up, she’s a knockout” A women with good character is rarer then rubies, and if you take good care of yourself, like my mom did, you can still look youthful and young in your later years. Women do not suddenly become valueless once they hit a certain age, same with men.

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There are always exceptions to the rule.

And nobody knows if your mom would have been happier if she got married before her late 30s or not.

I don't understand people always coming up with their one personal experience to argue against a sociological problem that is happening in the aggregate.

[–]jayswervo564775 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Actually I can debate that. Men and women are different. Men values a woman looks and women values men incomes and assets, so if you’re aging in your 50s men won’t necessary look to wife u up especially if you’re a 50 year old woman with a child. Men on the other hand market value is their assets (money) so if a man is on his purpose he can definitely pull women even younger ones. We see it all the time with older men wifing up younger women because of the assets they hold, but women on the other hand struggle. I also have data to display how single women in their 40s+ usually don’t marry if you would like it. Remember women hold the key to sex but men hold the key to marriage and you must appease what the dating market wants.

[–]soupcanfam -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I’m not at all saying that men marrying younger is not a thing. When we’re young is really the best time to pick what ever we want from the flock. But, I’m saying women don’t lose their value as they age. For secular men, looks do matter more. But more religious men, look for good character to wife up. So it does depend on culture too. I also used to work for a woman who married an extremely wealthy attractive man in her fifties. So to say you shouldn’t date in your later years is goofy. If you’re not able to get married in your later years, that more has to do with innerseld and less with your age.

[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

We all lose value as we age. I am not as agile&energetic as i was when i was 17 and i sure as hell won't be anywhere NEAR that when i turn 40. I bet i could easily beat my 40 yr old self from the future. Youth is the single most important factor when it comes to education,jobs&dating. When you cross a certain age threshold, you get into problems, for ex:Having little or no Job Experience at 30 or being single at 40. Sure, its not the end of the world but your opportunities are now few&far between at that point.

If you’re not able to get married in your later years, that more has to do with innerself and less with your age.

That is ignorant, the dating pool&dynamics for older people is drastically different. Men lose attraction to women after a certain age(the 40s), you can't blame this on anyone but nature.

[–]TopTHEbest232 19 points20 points21 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

You're part of the reason we're all called misogynists. Do better.

[–]Delicious_String8216 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I'm sure there is some misogynist around here, but it's most likely a feminist troll.

I have seen many times clearly misogynist messages from users who even define themselves as such. They always spout shit very blatantly, get booed by everyone, downvoted, deleted by mods and banned by reddit, but they never disappear from these little communities.

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto -3 points-2 points-1 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'm so sick of white knights like you.

Defending women is not going to get you laid bro.

[–]Yowazzuplol 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Your account is 5 days old. Ok?

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's a very feminist strategy to attack the person when you've lost the argument. So now my account or my hair color or my gender is the issue, rather than the actual argument.

I'm so sick of feminists such as you.

[–]Yowazzuplol 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sick of you, bro. Fight me bitch

[–]Dont-Cry-Kiddo -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Lmao says the brainlet who just the other day called someone retarded, says that women over 30 don't deserve to date and are useless to society, and who bitches and squeals all day about white knights and how women are ruining society. Your mommy needs to take away your internet privileges.

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok feminist

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, logic is important and I will only spit facts.

You're part of the reason feminists have a voice. You keep defending women in ways they should not be defended.

Part of the reason why today's women are feminists are because of you.

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"We" is a dangerous word.

[–]Remarkable_Weather21 -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

that's not misogynist tho

[–]DIES-_-IRAE 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dumb.

[–]GltyUntlPrvnInncnt 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You should probably take that misogyny elsewhere. You can be an anti-feminist without shitting on women.

[–]DoctorCodezZ -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Nothing about my comment is "shitting on women" unless you believe in feminist bullshit.

If anything, it's "shitting on society" because it creates a huge pool of men excluded from having any reason to want to live in this society, no stake in this society, and would rather burn it all down. It's not a stable thing to have for anyone - men or women.

Men are opting out of this clown world in droves, and some of it is peaceful. But not all of it will be peaceful. When you have 70-80% of men completely excluded from family and relationships and have no reason to want to support society or the future of society, there will be a huge collapse. It's the reason why religions existed to stabilize society with rules.

Why is the rule of monogamy so beneficial? Because it means that we don't exclude 70-80% of men from society. Of course, this can create undesirable restrictions on both men and women. Some prefer the freedom to date as many people as they want in life. It's a very understandable freedom. But the consequence of this freedom, is that you abandon very large pools of people, and you might say, "oh that doesn't matter to me, that's their problem". But it actually becomes everyone's problem when 70-80% of men decide, "fuck society, idgaf about anyone or anything".

Crime increases, homelessness increases, hate crimes increase, prisons increase, there are more laws and fewer freedoms for everyone in general, productivity of the country suffers greatly, poverty increases. Is this a tradeoff worth having for the freedom to have more than one partner?

I'm not really sure.

But we should at least ADDRESS THE FUCKING TRADEOFF and not act like it's just the problem of those individuals to somehow "get their act together" in a world where they have no reason to, and in a world that has discarded them as trash.

Your comment (and all the other comments) make me understand even better why feminism is such a strong force right now. When logic is offensive, truth is prohibited.

[–]mcove97 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So only men above 30 or 40 should? That would mean men over 30 and 40 should date those who are below 30 you realize that right? So men in their 50s should date 20 year olds? don't make me lol

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Your fantasy made-up rules about dating by age has nothing to do with thousands of years of evolutionary history and the way men and women mate biologically.

You're no different than the psychotic feminists who narrowly believe in dumb shit while ignoring biology.

I didn't invent the rules. Nature, for whatever reason, has decided that women have a very different sell-by-date than men.

Is it CRUEL that NATURE decided men can have kids between the ages of like ~14 all the way to ~85, but women can have kids between the ages of like ~14 all the way to ~38 (peak at ~24 and exponentially declines every year after). I don't know if it's CRUEL but it is what it is.

What this simply means is that you're going to have a shit ton of men chasing after a small group of highly desirable women who have a lot to lose if they get pregnant (biologically). Which basically puts all the power of the mating process into the women's hands for a very narrow point in her life.

You make it sound like it's a shitty deal only for women that they peak at 24. It's a wonderful deal for women for a short period of time, and it's a dumbass move on their part to prioritize bull shit like their "career" which is realistically a goddamn wage slave job. And in research after research, the majority of people find that it's their family or relationships that provide the most meaning and value in their life - not their damn 9-5. And this narrows the band even more. There are basically a drastic shortage of eligible women, which gives those who are eligible a lot of power.

It's not a great deal for women. It's not a great deal for men, who now have to compete with basically every damn age range of men. A lot of men will never mate before they die. For some reason, nature likes it that way. In a polygamous society, which modern society pretty much is now with so much "freedom" from tradition and casual dating, women will go to the extreme end of their selectivity because they can. So yes, the top 5% of men will get 65% of women. Most men will be pretty damn miserable in terms of having a healthy relationship. This isn't necessarily great for those women either, since there's no way the top 5% can have long-term or deep relationships with all the women he dates.

It's actually balanced, even though extremely different. In other words, it's just nature. Your judgement is political and shrouded with fantasies and intentions and beliefs that you simply "wish were true, but are not". And going against nature always ends badly.

And you might say that it's not just about having kids.

But it is, even if you're not having kids. The more freedom we have, the more we actually act as our biology desires. Why do women select for men who are strong and have money and good genetics, where as men seem to only select for women who have good genetics? Everything we do in dating has procreation seeping through, even if it's not our intent in any way whatsoever.

It's not the fucking patriarchy. It's human evolution. Even when a man is not dating to impregnate a woman, he prefers attractive, healthy, younger women. That is biology. I don't think it's offensive or bad or anything. It's actually more disgusting that we can't even acknowledge human biology and history.

I'm so sick of people who white knight women against "misogyny" that is clearly just logic. This sub is becoming the same leftist trash that is the rest of reddit. No logic anymore.

[–]nightreaper__ -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You're the kind of guy where someone sees this comment, screenshots it, then says look how bad r/antifeminists is

[–]BitcoinOnlyNotCrypto 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's not my fault that they are offended by logic.

[–]nightreaper__ 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a pretty big oof from me fellas

[–]Silver-Discipline550 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually makes perfect sense

[–]maxiligamer 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where do you get that data from? Would like to check some subs.

[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Got down a little lower and you'd see MENSLIB too.

[–]BasedInnit 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What a surprise lmao

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter