What I mean is..... People like to say "it depends on a persons type". Some will claim that what one person finds very attractive say a 8/10 others may only see that as a 4/10. Just because they have totally different "types".

Me and my best friend have tried to study this. Well mostly me I just asked him to rate some women and tried to compare it to mine. This is what I found. And yes I get that the sample size here is ridiculously small.

First of all this is the 1-10 scale we use

1-4 different levels of ugly. 1 being deformed. 4 just ugly.

5 plain average not particularly attractive

6 fuckable (I actually think there's a huge gap between 5 and 6)

7 attractive

8 very attractive

9 gorgeous

10 nobody can look better. only equal.

What I've found in my very limited research is that between the two of us.

8-10: There is slight deviation. Meaning what I think is a 9 or a 10 he might think is only an 8 and vice versa. Often though we agree on the dot what a person is. For the most part we agree when a person is in the upper range.

5-7: Here there is a tremendous amount of deviation. Especially considering what a huge perception gap there is between a 5 and a 7. There are instances of chicks who I would rate as a high quality 7 that he didn't even find attractive. To the point where I was just like "what the fuck".

1-4: Here there is very little deviation. I mean we don't particularly discuss about whether a person should be a 3 or a 4. But ugly is almost always ugly. There isn't too many chicks that me or him find bangable that the other wouldn't at least consider plain.

I've heard statements like "Some women like fat guys". I often wonder if that's really the case or they are just settling and giving away that impression.

I find SOME larger women attractive. But usually those are the ones who you can tell would look gorgeous if they just lost some pounds.