~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
007MGTOW
[–]DangZagnut232 points233 points234 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
He may be inbred but he doesn’t look like Mr. potato head.
[–]Sir_manalot73 points74 points75 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Mr. Imbred is sexier and gets more pussy lol.
[–]Morphs_43 points44 points45 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That's how he was able to come to his conclusions.
Meanwhile the other guy is still fantasizing about pussy.
[–]beatles-lover7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Probably but we need to resist the urge to judge men based on their attractiveness to women.
[–]TheMikman978 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Not like the guy in the right has any other thing going for him
[–]beatles-lover7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yes, quite likely he is your classic White Knight neck-beard who thinks that by being a feminist ally he might get a women to give him the time of day.
As far as the guy on the left goes, whether he's Chad or not doesn't really matter. Although I agree that his appearance rebuts the feminist charge that anti-feminists are men who are unattractive.
[–]Sir_manalot6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Not in this instance.
The ugly dude is trying to discredit the man who is sexier then him by saying he is genetically inferior.
Which means that he definitely deserves to be judged.
It is like a ugly fat girl saying all men under 6 foot are ugly and people calling her out on her stupidity by pointing out the fact that she is unattractive.
[–][deleted] 47 points48 points49 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I know like wtf imagine calling someone else inbred when you're a blobl with a horrible haircut while the dude you're hating on is a fucking chad
[–]NEEDZ2Quit7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He is also not a libtard snowflake
[–]jeffreywolfe3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Looks like Batista's fat, nerdy brother.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]InformalCriticism5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Banging chad while he's holding a sign for one of her other orbiters to take a picture for imaginary internet points.
[–]ButterfingersBiden119 points120 points121 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
Ever notice the dudes who openly hate women have actually slayed cunt before?
Guy on the right looks like a regular at inceltears
[–]300C32 points33 points34 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I used to be pretty blue pilled years ago. A few of my friends who lack success with women are still "blue pill". After a handful of years successfully dealing with women, I realized that they can be more disgusting and vile than us men. And they are so judgemental too. My friends who do well with women all agree with me when I say they are just a pain in the ass to deal with. These blue pilled men have little success/time spent with women, so they just don't really know what women are capable of (or don't care enough) because they still yearn for any girl to give them attention/sex.
[–]RLskeleton11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Yep, same old story everywhere you look.
Before you can get laid: “All women are queens! Only sexist losers could hate women! Men and women are equal, and should be treated equally!”
After you can get laid: “bitches ain’t shit.”
Unfortunately this lesson is harder too safely learn these days because a woman can just destroy your life at any time if you ever got close to them.
[–]zAnklee7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
After living with three women my whole life my blue pill stage didn't last long no matter how hard they tried to indoctrinate me. Living with three made me really disgusted with them and frankly sick of being around them. Barely clean, make me do all the dirty work, run all the errands then call me a lazy slob at the end of it. Screw them, live on your own.
[–]beenthere7893 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
So true bro... I have had success with women.. And it was through this that I decided that they are not worth the time, effort or money spent on them.. And took up gyow.. The irony of the situation is that just even yesterday got hit up twice while grocery shopping.. They have a radar that tells them to want what they can't have.. Worst thing to do EVER is chase them.. And really screw them up by not paying any attention to them..and you're right... Most bluepilled guys have not had any success with women or are married..
[–]Touch_It_Boi0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
You know ricky martin... Imagine how much pussy he had in the 90s... Something happened and he went gay
[+]TwoHourShowers-13 points-12 points-11 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Lmao I’d imagine “slaying” your sister’s cunt doesn’t count
[–]ButterfingersBiden4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
I don't have a sister.
I do have a brother though who totally sniffs butts
You have duh aids now.
[+]TwoHourShowers-6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I never said you did? Unless that’s you on the left.
Something I’ve noticed in this sub lately is that 9/10 people are dense as fuck
[–]bfte21 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Reminds me of MSN messenger.
[–][deleted] 72 points73 points74 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
The guy on the left is a damn hero.
[–]007MGTOW[S] 42 points43 points44 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
His name was Robert Paulson.
[–]totally_not_anxious15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Was?
[–]Careful_Description15 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hmm that's also the sentence we used for those who died and we respected... I guess he died.
[–]MindOfAProphet9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
In death, a member of Project Mayhem has a name. His name is Robert Paulson.
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
His name is Robert Paulson
[–]MindOfAProphet2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Username checks out
[–]stupidonparade0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
His name is Robert Paulson.
[–]hrm08945 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
It still is, but also in the past.
[–]totally_not_anxious4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
No I mean, did he die.
[–]john212325 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Inside, once he took the red pill. Now he’s trying to show the truth to a world who wants to live in a lie.
[–]007MGTOW[S] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Aye lad, Paulson was a great man. Even greater after ye red pillin.
[–]RIPOldAccountF2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He had bitch tits
[–]totally_not_anxious7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
...which left?
[–]Helikzhan2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed.
[+][deleted] 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]zenman1232 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Happy cake day
[–]john2123215 points16 points17 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Judging by that head, he was a C section baby, so not even his mama’s.
[–]keltsbeard0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He's gotta step into his shirts.
[–]007MGTOW[S] 52 points53 points54 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
White knights will defend women's ruin of western society until the last church is burned down.
[–]uknoUto12 points13 points14 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Notre dame was the first since today
[–]Belrick_NZ7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
as long as theirs a chance that they get laid they will
[–]KarosGraveyard27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Guy on the right is the type of guy to jack off hiding inside a closet while the girl hes orbiting is getting plowed by Chad 1 and Chad 2.
Then hanging himself once they’re done
[–]myrptaway14 points15 points16 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Dude is fat as hell, doubt he can get an erection.
[–]GuntherVonHairyballs13 points14 points15 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
He can get an erection, he just can't reach it.
[–]AnneFrankensteiner2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Or hang himself, he has too much natural neck armour.
[–]myrptaway1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Hahaha reminds me of always sunny
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=yY_VPOG9yUY
[–]aodhan2k24 points25 points26 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
How can you call somebody inbred when you look like the rejected anus fodder that ran down your mommas asscrack
[–]Trollileo1231 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Indeed
[–]Lawuhiku18 points19 points20 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
When people can't come up with a real argument
[–]john212323 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
He clearly did not plan his sign very well, writing inbred so small.
[–]anti-hypergamist20 points21 points22 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The physiognomy is about what you would expect for the both of them. Chad Le Shitlourde vs Soy Knight.
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
Who in that picture looks like they are the result of in-breading?
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
The girl in the back!
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The round guy on the right does! He's so inbred that he's got the sign pointing the wrong way!
[–]Trollileo1230 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
In-breading?
Like a calzone?
[–]juice_bomb7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Later that night Mr white knight posted on his Facebook. Waiting millennia for women to message him thrusting pussy in his face.
[–]TimVertex7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No one hasn’t proven otherwise.
[–]bfte25 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And yet he's the one looking like an inbred.
[–]shatterthecrystal634 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The guy on the right looks imbred.
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Dude on the right is legit inbred. Look at the ears.
[–]some1arguewithme1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The hero we need.
[–]wildfireboat1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Potato Head: "How DARE a Man speak ill of females! I must act!"
[–]Ill_Childhood1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Inbred or not. He doesnt have 2 chins
[–]RLskeleton1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ah, the ol’ resort to add hominem attacks when you can’t argue a claim.
[–]Touch_It_Boi1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Who's the inbreed of those 2?
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Pretty brave to hold up a counter sign next to Tyler Durden.
[–]RedPilledSimp1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Found the inbred whit Knight FIFY....
[–]Tundrac0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ironic...
[–]KayZabba1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Wouldn't say a white knight... I'll say he found the one for now....
[–]MegaAlphadon0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What's autistic Shrek doing out of his swamp?
[–]xshoulddie0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
wamen should have no rights
[–]Carnosauria0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link
The guy on the left is so inbred he forgot how to point the sign the right way (upwards).
[–]r1chten0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Saw that on trashy...got down voted for my round about observation
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
m'lady
[–]BarfTheChicken0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
he’s inbred to be fair the guy holding that sign looks a bit inbred himself
[–]strangerthing70 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Can I get a crumb of pussy now?
[–]Pimozv0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Is he? Because if he's not, then it's just a plain insult of very poor taste.
[–]InformalCriticism-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This is actually an apolitical view.
Conservatives think female rights have gone too far, which supports his claim.
Liberals lost to D. Trump because 52% of women voted for him.
I'm sure there's a meme in there, but facts are always stranger than fiction.
[–]ravious7777-5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Is it just me or is this sub turning into straight up sexism, like god damn im all for men’s rights and against feminism but thats a big yikes from me dog, anyway this finna get downvoted to hell but whatever
[–]karnamansplainer2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
MGTOW and MRA both are different.. And what exactly is sexism? For me, Calling anyone sexist or misogynist is sexism so you are sexist. Get out
[–]beatles-lover1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The problem is that either women will be second class citizens or men will be second class citizens. There's really no way to have equality. Why? Because in general women are very biased in favor of other women and men are slightly biased in favor of women. So if you start from a situation of equal power, the system will inevitably slide into more and more bias in favor of women.
The only thing limiting this process is that runaway gynocentrism is expensive and destructive and anti-natalist.
To be sure, MGTOW is more about men walking away from an unfair system than trying to fix it, but it's still fun to poke fun at the White Knights who keep the merry-go-round spinning.
[+]Lawliet_LXIV-6 points-5 points-4 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
I'm surprised that you guys actually think that giving rights to women is bad. Disgusting.
[–]beatles-lover3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Why? If women are given power in society -- the sort of power which men have traditionally wielded -- women will inevitably abuse that power and oppress men, harming themselves and society in general in the process.
[–]Tcheeks380 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
So it's cool that historically, men in power made laws that made women property and made it so women couldn't even inherit their husbands property after death. The brother of a woman's husband would actually gain ownership of her after the husbands passing at one point in time. Just saying. There are corrupt amongst both genders so your arguement that all men are saints and more trustworthy than all women is kind of bullshit. Also, I'm a man and I'm married, so I get nothing out of white knighting. Just spitting some truth.
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
So it's cool that historically, men in power made laws that made women property
When did this happen historically? When's the last time that a man in an English-speaking country legally put his wife up for sale and sold her? Please enlighten me.
There are corrupt amongst both genders so your arguement that all men are saints and more trustworthy than all women is kind of bullshit.
Lol, nice strawman. I'm not saying that all men are saints. What I am saying is that men can be trusted to protect women's interests. Women cannot be trusted to protect men's interests. The reason for this is that women have a strong bias in favor of women; men have a mild bias in favor of women.
Also, I'm a man and I'm married, so I get nothing out of white knighting. Just spitting some truth.
Spitting feminist nonsense. Please tell me the last time in an English speaking country it was legal for a husband to sell his wife. Just tell me the country and the year.
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
There were instances of daughters being bought from their father. I guess technically it would be called a dowry. Either way, money changed hands for a bride. Aside from that, a woman had no rights in the 1800's she was to do her husband's bidding. I don't want to really talk to someone like you anymore because you seem like the type that want's to go back to those times. You criticize my argument yet offer no source of proof to back your own claims. This subreddit had my respect until I realized how many dudes here seem to have such a problem with ALL women after (what I'm guessing) being hurt by one or a few piece of crap women along the way. Just try to remember, people suck, not white, black, yellow, man, woman. Stop making this a place to openly cry and complain about woman just because the system/laws currently favor them. Take action and change the laws rather than condemning an entire gender.
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
There were instances of daughters being bought from their father. I guess technically it would be called a dowry. Either way, money changed hands for a bride. Aside from that, a woman had no rights in the 1800's she was to do her husband's bidding
Look, if your claim is correct that "laws made women property," then you should be able to cite instances when husbands (legally) sold their wives in the English speaking world in the last few hundred years. If you can't do that, then you should just admit that you are spouting feminist nonsense that you never thought through very carefully.
I don't want to really talk to someone like you anymore
Of course not -- who wants to talk to someone who calls people out on their BS? The fact is that you are full of feminist horsesh*t. Men can and will do a perfectly fine job of protecting women's interests even if women don't vote. In the United States, women didn't vote from the very beginning until 1920 and you haven't offered even a shred of evidence that husbands could legally sell their wives during this time.
Just try to remember, people suck, not white, black, yellow, man, woman
Of course -- most people here know that. Just like women, men instinctively engage in destructive behavior which is why we have norms and laws in place to keep destructive male instincts in check. The problem is that our gynocentric system keeps trying to water down the norms and laws which keep destructive female instincts in check.
Take action and change the laws rather than condemning an entire gender.
No idea what your point is here. What's the problem with recognizing the reality of female nature?
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
You are taking my words too literally maybe. Women had so few rights that the only way they could breathe, eat, and live was if a man made it so. There was a time where they couldn't have a job to make money to support themselves. They couldn't own property to live on. The only way to survive was your father or a husband. Does that make more sense to you?
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You are taking my words too literally maybe.
No, I am interpreting your words reasonably. Now that you've called out on your feminist BS, you prefer to pretend you said something different from what you actually said.
Ahh, so what you ACTUALLY MEANT was that historically, there were laws which treated men and women differently. And yes, that's completely "cool" as far as I am concerned.
There was a time where they couldn't have a job to make money to support themselves
When was the last time in the English-speaking world that it was literally illegal for a woman to work in exchange for wages?
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I fail to see how you consider me a feminist. Look through my account history. I'm a black, gun-loving conservative from the south. As a dude, I'm just as sickened by the cultural/attitude change surrounding not all, but a lot of women. Definitely a lot of expectations of equality but only when convenient. I am with you up to that point. What disgusts me is the open hatred of all women as a whole that seems to have manifested here when the hatred should be of the system that enables it. You seem to have this superiority complex where you are fine with certain demographics being treated differently and having less rights as you and I cannot agree with that.
If you choose to interpret what I said differently, that's cool with me. I concede to being wrong about women not being able to legally work, they were extremely limited in what they were allowed to do (mostly manual/textile labor). And while a woman might not have been property to be bought and sold, they are de facto slaves in the sense that without a husband they were unable to own anything themselves. See the following line referenced throughout the link, "(only)Married women allowed to own and manage property in their own name (only) during the incapacity of their spouse" See this referenced a lot here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_women%27s_legal_rights_(other_than_voting)_in_the_19th_century.
I admire your ability to argue objectively, but if you truly feel that all people don't deserve the same rights, then I have a hard time respecting you as a fellow human in the same way you seem to have trouble respecting entire groups of people as a whole. People are not mindless husks to be lumped into a category and considered shit because of appearances. I hope that out on the streets you judge people as individuals. You would be surprised at the amount of diversity that exists within the various ethnic groups.
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
I fail to see how you consider me a feminist
Actually what I said was that you are spouting feminist nonsense. Which is in fact true.
What disgusts me is the open hatred of all women as a whole
If "hatred of all women" means the belief that men and women are significantly different, then yeah, I hate women. Too bad that the truth disgusts you.
they are de facto slaves
If anyone was a de facto slave it was men due to historical conscription. Even today, men are de facto slaves to any woman who rapes them using fraud or force and gets pregnant as a result. You claim not to be a feminist, but for some reason you are getting all riled up over imaginary enslavement of women in the distant past while actual enslavement of men is taking place right now.
but if you truly feel that all people don't deserve the same rights, then I have a hard time respecting you as a fellow human in the same way you seem to have trouble respecting entire groups of people as a whole.
Let me ask you this: Do you agree that children are people?
[–]11bNg3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Why are u here then
[+]ForerunnerOfLaughter-8 points-7 points-6 points 7 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link
Wow this Subreddit's a lot more sexist than one would think.
[–]karnamansplainer4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link
Anyone who use word "Sexist" is just misandrist..so you are sexist.
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-5 points-4 points-3 points 7 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link
By that logic you yourself are sexist. This whole subs just upsetting. I hope everyone here can find peace in themselves and stop hating an entire gender and start loving themselves.
[–]JrBlack954 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link
Why do you betas come into red pilled subs with a holier-than-thou attitude? Do you really think we give a fuck about what you blue pill pussies who allow themselves to be spoon-fed MSM narratives have to say? Congratulations, you're like every other guy who lacks critical thinking and puts the pussy on a pedestal. Most guys here got over that line of thought when they realized it doesn't work in building successful relationships
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
With an attitude like that I can see why the relationships didn't work out.
[–]JrBlack952 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Lmao you're so wise guy, please tell me how much success you've had by being a perfect gentleman.
Anecdotal Fact: EVERY SINGLE relationship I've ever had with a woman was better the less I care about her. The more I've cared, the less affection and respect I've received. And this is proven time and time again by red pill men. But please, subscribe to your blue pill values and enjoy getting walked all over for the rest of your life like the good little beta you are
[–]Tcheeks380 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Sounds like you dated girls and not women. I'll agree, it's hard to find a woman before she's been indoctrinated, but good women are out there. You might have just given up too soon.
[–]JrBlack950 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Learn the term NAWALT
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
You don't have to be a "perfect gentleman," just gotta remember to have a set of balls on yourself. If you think theres no leeway being a pushover and a complete asshole to someone you've already made up your mind on relationships.
[–]JrBlack952 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
See now you're throwing shit out there. When did I say I'm a complete asshole all the time? This is what you blue pillars & leftists always do, you put words into someone else's argument to suit your narrative. Calling out women's hypergamous nature isn't being an asshole, and in fact, it's much more scientific than any blue pill theory out there
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Ok lets take that relationship hangup aside. Whats your thoughts on others saying the left sign in the picture is correct. Do women not have a right to vote? Do they not deserve it? You fucking brought up relationships on a post not related to it.
[–]JrBlack951 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Yes, the uncomfortable truth is that I don't think they should have the right. They vote for policies that have disintegrated western values from the inside out. The nurturing nature of a woman makes it hard for them to think objectively about things like immigration, welfare and economic policy. They consistently vote for what sounds good rather than what does good. Western society is being murdered in front of our eyes, and they're a major part of it. Them and every other leftist
[–]karnamansplainer0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
By that logic you are a pussy who support feminism. Give us a favor and delete your account. Worthless cunt.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]DangZagnut232 points233 points234 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot73 points74 points75 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Morphs_43 points44 points45 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover7 points8 points9 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]TheMikman978 points9 points10 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 47 points48 points49 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NEEDZ2Quit7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]jeffreywolfe3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]InformalCriticism5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ButterfingersBiden119 points120 points121 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]300C32 points33 points34 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]RLskeleton11 points12 points13 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]zAnklee7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]beenthere7893 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Touch_It_Boi0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]TwoHourShowers-13 points-12 points-11 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ButterfingersBiden4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]TwoHourShowers-6 points-5 points-4 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]bfte21 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 72 points73 points74 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]007MGTOW[S] 42 points43 points44 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]totally_not_anxious15 points16 points17 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Careful_Description15 points16 points17 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MindOfAProphet9 points10 points11 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]MindOfAProphet2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]stupidonparade0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]hrm08945 points6 points7 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]totally_not_anxious4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]john212325 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]007MGTOW[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RIPOldAccountF2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]totally_not_anxious7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Helikzhan2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (1 child) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]zenman1232 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+][deleted] (2 children) | Copy Link
[deleted]
[–]john2123215 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]keltsbeard0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]007MGTOW[S] 52 points53 points54 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]uknoUto12 points13 points14 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Belrick_NZ7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KarosGraveyard27 points28 points29 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]myrptaway14 points15 points16 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]GuntherVonHairyballs13 points14 points15 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]AnneFrankensteiner2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]myrptaway1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aodhan2k24 points25 points26 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Trollileo1231 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lawuhiku18 points19 points20 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]john212323 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]anti-hypergamist20 points21 points22 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Trollileo1230 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]juice_bomb7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]TimVertex7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bfte25 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]shatterthecrystal634 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]some1arguewithme1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]wildfireboat1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ill_Childhood1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RLskeleton1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Touch_It_Boi1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RedPilledSimp1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tundrac0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KayZabba1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MegaAlphadon0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]xshoulddie0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Carnosauria0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]r1chten0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]BarfTheChicken0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]strangerthing70 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Pimozv0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]InformalCriticism-1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ravious7777-5 points-4 points-3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]karnamansplainer2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]Lawliet_LXIV-6 points-5 points-4 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover3 points4 points5 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tcheeks380 points1 point2 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tcheeks381 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]beatles-lover0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]11bNg3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]ForerunnerOfLaughter-8 points-7 points-6 points (16 children) | Copy Link
[–]karnamansplainer4 points5 points6 points (15 children) | Copy Link
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-5 points-4 points-3 points (14 children) | Copy Link
[–]JrBlack954 points5 points6 points (12 children) | Copy Link
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-4 points-3 points-2 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]JrBlack952 points3 points4 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]Tcheeks380 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]JrBlack950 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter-1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]JrBlack952 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ForerunnerOfLaughter1 point2 points3 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]JrBlack951 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]karnamansplainer0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link