~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
UmbraAnimo
[–]ConnorGracie27 points28 points29 points 7 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
I think this ends with Islam. If everything is rape we'll segregate women and cover them with bags just to keep ourselves safe.
[–]lulz3r8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Maybe they saw it coming.
[–]RoxgorTheDestroyer9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
it sadly makes a lot of sense.
[–]ImNotReallyJesus7 points8 points9 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Mohammed speaks a lot of RedPill. That a woman will lie so it takes two women to equal a man's confession. That the gates of Hell are lined with women. The reason why the practice of taking child brides was for grooming the woman out of thoting.
The pound me too movement was started by a proclaimed muslim woman. If it takes 2 women and 10 women come forward and lie; they MUST be telling the truth. It doesn't work as effectively in the arab countries, because there women are all accounted for at all times. In America and Europe? Super-effective.
[–]donallanod3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
People/society tend to over compensate. The end result of feminism isn't balance, it's oppression, in the other direction.
It's a big pendulum that's swinging all the way to one side and then the other.
[–]footloosemonk 8 points9 points10 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Me thinks everyone should stop recognizing themselves under a label and just go their own way according to their own life circumstances.
[–]F5Champion2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
This. I feel like people don’t even have their OWN ideals anymore, they just align with whatever label they’ve chosen and stop thinking for themselves.
[–]Sir_manalot2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
That is why I speak so adamantly against tradcons and conservatives.
I am a libertarian and I am more aligned to conservative views them liberal views really.
But ideology has become so cult like that I despise what conservatives have become.
Liberals have good points, conservatives have good points and both have bad points.
This needs to stop.
[–]mckaystites4 points5 points6 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
Conservatives != Incels
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
Liberals = cucks.
[–]mckaystites3 points4 points5 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
i think maybe you should like, take more effort to comprehend my comment cause you didn’t quite scratch the surface just yet
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] -1 points0 points1 point 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I think you should understand that eloquent writing isn't dependent on vocabulary.
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Dude, != means doesn't equal (or not equal).
Meaning he agrees with you.
You give conservatives a bad name.
Going around trying to insult people who agree with you while religously pounding your chest like a cultist.
Conservatism is a good ideology, but you are as blind as any sjw.
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Ok, I misunderstood.
Nothing else you said has any basis.
[–]toxic_masculine_guy5 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There’s nothing to conserve.
[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (41 children) | Copy Link
Why so you hate on our liberal mgtow brothers?
(There are plenty of them here)
[–]lulz3r6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago (38 children) | Copy Link
They’re basically low key simps.
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (37 children) | Copy Link
And the mgtow tradcons aren't?
C'mon man, mgtow has nothing to do with political affiliation.
[–]trseeker9 points10 points11 points 7 years ago (35 children) | Copy Link
You can't be going your own way while also advocating for greater regulation of everyone else's life. That is literally the opposite of going your own way; that is forcing everyone else to go with you.
[–]Avaoln2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It depends on the liberal but most regulations are to protect the environment or regulate wall street. Regulations can be bad or good, some protect your drinking water others are dumb and useless but you can’t paint them all with broad strokes.
Also both sides have their crazies but I willing to bet they are only a loud minority
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link
Conservatism also has elements of regulating other people's lives...like advocating for men to man up to upkeep society and restricting women's freedoms to control women's slutty hypergamous nature.
Trump and his party even went out if his way to fight prostitution, getting sites like Backpage banned.
As sexual freedom works against the conservative lowest societal unit. The family, not the individual.
Without any regulation, there is no society, order, stability or freedom really.
Conservative and liberals understand this, but push in different directions.
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
This is stupid. It doesn't advocate for men to man up. It celebrates the inherent nature of a man. It's the corruption of women that plunges society into chaos. Men and women complement eachother, by nature. It's not "control". That is a simple truth, acknowledged by conservatism, and fought and denied by liberals.
I see what you're trying to do with your argument, "conservatives regulate too, otherwise we can't have society". This is intellectual dishonesty. Fundamentally, conservatism - is the acknowledgement of practises that allow a society to thrive. These practises come naturally. Men's leadership, desire to build, conquer. Women's nurturing of the home and children.
Fighting prostitution, wtf is this point meant to serve?
[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Corruption of women?
You need to read history.
As nobody corrupted women, this is what they naturally are.
It is why feminists scream about the vile patriarchy, because conservatism pushes women away from what they naturally are...what they wish to be.
Conservatism instead blue pills men and women to get them to work together.
By raising men (and women) to believe women want betas. So men would work incredibly hard in the rat race to give women everything they want.
Ultimately turning women into carrots (objects) to entice men (tools) to work hard to build society.
Why do you think traditional conservativism, religion and prudism go hand in hand historically?
Because we have to keep lieing to the population (especially women) to keep the system going.
Historically, when men learned that women find aloof, independent, aggressive and defiant bad boys attractive (not hard working, loving, nice guy betas), they stopped working in the rat race.
Instead choosing to chase entertainment and celebrity positions (rock stars, lute plays, chariot drivers, actors, poets, models, etc) while
So we locked away women's sexuality to the point that they never understood what they wanted.
We taught men that women aren't interested in sex, do not cheat, are empathetic, not shallow, etc.
But now that they are liberated, we see the opposite is true.
I think I made my point clear, that conservatism is about fighting our nature to go farther, not working with them.
Does it work? Is it useful? Is it the best system humans have ever created? Yes.
But it is not and never will be natural.
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Conservatism is about harnessing our nature to go further.
"Progressivism" is about giving in to our worse nature.
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
"Backpage" was being used for human trafficking that is why Trump went after it.
Conservatives push towards economic prosperity. "Progressives" push towards enslavement.
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Actually, backpage made it easier to catch trafficers and safer for prostitutes to avoid being captured by trafficersers.
It is harder to get a non-trafficed escort now, making it easier for trafficers to get bussiness. Incentivizing trafficers to get more involved.
There is no longer a website that has records of all the prostitutes in the local area, making it more difficult to locate trafficers.
There are other reasons, but it was never about stopping trafficing but making it more difficult to find prostitutes. Republicans have always been the anti-sex party, being against abortion, birth control, casual sex, and prostitution for over 20 years now.
As sexual freedom works against conservatives system of enslavmen (marriage). They want men to marry and any sexual outlet outside of marriage may allow these men to be satisfied outside of marriage.
A different kind of enslavement.
Instead of taxes, conservatives used women's hypergamy to make men work harder then any other system. In an attempt to push men to satisfy women, who are designed to never be satisfied.
This is also why conservatives are fine with the current itteration of family court and the destruction of fatherhood and keep there mouths shut when it comes to a wife's infidelity...but are the first to speak out when it comes to male infidelity.
And Instead choosing to focus on things Ilike trying tk "save" lives via banning abortion, aka forcing people into parenthood to make them work harder to support the child. They could just make it easier to gain economic prosperity, making parenthood more appetizing, but it isn't about making a good life for the child...it is about maximizing responsibility while minimizing power.
Also why republicans are the ones that use to call male suicide selfish, because they did not care. Men like Jordan Peterson are now caring, but why did it take so long for republicans to even acknowledge the issue? Why did we have to wait for male suicide to be a leading cause of death for young men (leading in certain countries like the UK) for conservatives to even give a fuck?
TL;DR: conservatism and liberalism are not innately good or evil. If left unchecked, both are awful and result in people being enslaved.
Which is why we built a system that was ultimately about the two parties undermining the other one, in an attempt to keep the good parts of each ideology. All the while stopping the badparts from going out of control.
However our current environment has pushed both sides to extremism and is causing people to believe and act stupidly.
[–]trseeker1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Republicans have always been the anti-sex party, being against abortion, birth control, casual sex, and prostitution for over 20 years now.
Not true
And Instead choosing to focus on things Ilike trying tk "save" lives via banning abortion
aka forcing people into parenthood to make them work harder to support the child.
Also why republicans are the ones that use to call male suicide selfish
but why did it take so long for republicans to even acknowledge the issue?
Republicans were the last group to start seeing it because it wasn't happening around them.
Why did we have to wait for male suicide to be a leading cause of death for young men (leading in certain countries like the UK) for conservatives to even give a fuck?
Mis-characterization.
If left unchecked, both are awful and result in people being enslaved.
OK, finally something I agree with.
Our Constitution was built with the hope that there would be NO PARTIES at all.
Partially true. The "left" is way out of control, the "right" isn't.
I appreciate the long response, it took some effort to think about and to write it out.
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The issue is that the things I said are true.
Or to be clear, if they are not true, name a republican cannidate (while they were conservative) that believes in the opposite.
Name me as many republican canidates who are openly pro-choice, who is for legalizing prostitution, who took action against the family court system, etc.
You could probably find one or two exceptions, but I bet those canidates would be more toward the middle of the political spectrum because those are more liberal viewpoints.
The only one you could reasonably find are conservatives that are concerned about male suicide, but that only started happening due to it growing to such a large extent.
[–]KingZwack 1 point2 points3 points 7 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link
I support trade unions, national parks and wilderness areas, legalizing drugs, environmental regulations, government funding of basic science, etc...
There are plenty of reasons to favor certain left policies. Plenty of reason to favor certain policies. I just can't defend being a democrat or republican at this point, then we start throwing around words like liberal and conservative like they mean something anymore.
Knee jerk reactions on one side or the other precludes thinking for yourself.
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (24 children) | Copy Link
The Democrats are criminals with a criminal ideology. The Republicans also have some criminals but not nearly as many as the Democrats.
"Knee jerk." Not at all.
Taxation is theft it doesn't matter what you do with it after you steal it; still theft.
[–]KingZwack 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link
All politicians are criminals man.
"Taxation is theft" ranks right up there with "male privilege" as far as letting me know a productive conversation is out of the realm of possibility.
Watch out for these rhetorical traps as they preclude deep critical thinking.
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link
"Taxation is theft" is baseline reality. To not acknowledge this truth indicates you have blinded your mind.
[–]KingZwack 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link
Are you capable of forming an argument against the premise that taxation is theft? Being able to argue all sides of an issue is how one finds the truth.
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (20 children) | Copy Link
The argument against the premise requires too many false assumptions.
Edit: It requires no private property rights or rights dependent on the legal fiction of government.
[–]KingZwack1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'll take that as a no.
Your identity seems tightly wrapped up in the right-libertarian perspective. Ain't nothing wrong with that but saying your opinion is baseline reality, once again, sounds a lot like a feminist talking about male privilege.
[–]trseeker1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I know the argument against it and I just laid out the assumptions that are required. You on the other hand? Nope.
Edit: And my position is not where I started, I moved to this position because it is True.
Taxation is not theft, it is investment.
There, I just created a counter-thesis which is equally true to your thesis. Mine is the baseline reality and if you can't see that then your mind is already in a cage.
You imagined one, not based in any underlying truth.
I'm just playing your game. You have truth, I have truth. Whatever the fuck that means. Libertarians would be able to make this world a much better place if they weren't so dogmatic.
Isn't it strange that the Libertarian party in the US always suffers the No True Scotsman problem when it comes to picking and supporting candidates?
So you willingly choose to believe and propagate a known lie. Got it.
Don't we all?
I use money everyday... not about to stop.
You acknowledge that it is a fiction. You do not acknowledge the "right to tax" as a fiction. This makes all the difference and requires you to willfully blind your mind.
Edit: It also makes you willfully propagating lies.
The problem with building such a beautiful ideology on paper is that at some point you have to bring that into the physical world.
Even libertarians acknowledge on some level that we must cooperate as a group to survive. If we abolished The Government we may have a brief respite and then another form of government would form. Corporations or war lords or kings. There will always be some form of governing in human societies.
The right to tax may be a legal fiction the same way as money and my name are legal fictions, but they exist in order for us to manipulate the physical environment to our advantage.
The Law exists as a pseudo-fiction to bridge the gap between philosophy and our physical reality.
You can accuse me of propagating lies but I call it existing.
As long as you admit you are a liar, that is the first step to recovery.
These parallels between libertarians and feminists just keep going deeper. Don't wanna have a conversation because you know deep down you're wrong so you go for the character instead. Pathetic.
Libertarian God I confess I am a liar. Feminist Goddess I confess I am a rapist.
Ideology is dangerous dude, but keep telling yourself you have all the answers.
I barely have any answers. But I do know for certain some of the falsehoods. Keep lying.
Do you feel better about yourself when you call people liars?
Projection, another feminist favorite trait.
[–]trseeker0 points 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"Projection" would be the psychological condition of having a quality that I deny in myself while attributing it to you. This isn't what is happening. Nice try though. Liar.
Do you get off on making little quips so people stop talking to you and you can get a small dose of smug self-validation? It's rather endearing.
Are you GYOW or TFL?
I get off on collapsing the wave function. Nowhere near the herd.
[–]reddits_dead_anyway1 point 7 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hahahaha oh man. That's a hoot. /R/iamverysmart is paging
You do realize the inherent contradiction in saying the right to tax is a fiction but the right to own property is not, right?
Jus = Law
Facio = make
Justification = make law (guess what, no human can "make law")
[–]lulz3r2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Two sides of the same coin. Simp vs Captain-save-a-hoe, both are responsible for the current state of affairs.
[–]MgtowisDaWey 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Lesser of two evils by a mile. At least be a libertarian, don’t be a liberal. You might as well join up with Anti-fa and advocate socialism/communism.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]ConnorGracie27 points28 points29 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]lulz3r8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]RoxgorTheDestroyer9 points10 points11 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]ImNotReallyJesus7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]donallanod3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]footloosemonk 8 points9 points10 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]F5Champion2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]mckaystites4 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] 11 points12 points13 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]mckaystites3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]toxic_masculine_guy5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points3 points (41 children) | Copy Link
[–]lulz3r6 points7 points8 points (38 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (37 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker9 points10 points11 points (35 children) | Copy Link
[–]Avaoln2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]UmbraAnimo[S] 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Sir_manalot0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack 1 point2 points3 points (25 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points (24 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack 0 points1 point2 points (23 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points (22 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack 0 points1 point2 points (21 children) | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points1 point2 points (20 children) | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]reddits_dead_anyway1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KingZwack1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]trseeker1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]lulz3r2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]MgtowisDaWey 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link