Men are something else. Without men, where would the world be?

User-31f64a4e · 2019-07-03T06:41:51+00:00

If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.

- Camille Paglia

Why_should_I_mayne · 2019-07-03T06:20:44+00:00

I'd have to disagree a bit on the quote on the picture. Some of the greatest inventors/scientists/innovators/artists were MGTOW. Nikola Tesla, Sir Isaac Newton, Antonio Vivaldi are just a few of the many examples. Men are so much superior than wahmen that they don't even need some emotional motivation to do great things. Men invent and create just because we can, it's in our nature. In a world of only men, we'd still be creating and making new innovations because it's simply innate.

Antipc02 · 2019-07-03T05:50:34+00:00

There's a tribe in Africa run by women they still having invented the wheel

MrMagtow · 2019-07-03T06:35:28+00:00

Don't be a SIMP or a Cuck. Don't be that guy. Go MGTOW.

Mad_King · 2019-07-03T08:31:02+00:00

You should watch the survival program on Tv which was on old times. Females just sitting there doing nothing but nagging on the other hand, males are doing constant work for feeding themselves and making environment helpful for them. That was painful to watch.

GrisBosque · 2019-07-03T05:51:49+00:00

for entire human history....

And all they can do is rag about us... time to stop being fools. let them support themselves, let them keep the system maintained, and we do what pleases ourselves.

My interpretation is semi retro. getting back to a simpler form of living. Others will have their own paths.

The system is at a crossroads anyway. Approaching Malthusian limits at the same time approaching the breaking into Space paradigm.

So I have realized that I can combine it all into a unified field theory.

And pursue the simpler life with subsistence as a hobby. Making things, and also be forwarding the very skills you'd want as a colonist in another solar system.

ie gives me security in case of a crash, gives me a life where I can reduce problems that usually show up as bills to others, and allows me to work towards needed skills on primitive worlds.

And FTL isnt as far off as most think. Gravity waves can be detected... if they can be detected they can be produced. They are near microwaves in frequency.

Basically Tesla was right; its about frequency and harmonics. He talked about moving planets. using charges.

He also talked about infinite energy being available at any point in the Universe.

And if you think about the physics, all there is is enegy in emptyness.

matter is energy in a concentratated or focused form.

And the spinning of atomic particles he described is most likely a Coriolis effect. ie the Universe is binary. cycles back and fourth like a two chamber pump.... Light speed is the zero point.

Where time stands still.

And there would be another hemisphere with things running the other direction including time.

Some particles are known to "skip" thru.....

people just arent connecting the logical dots... As Tesla pointed out theyre getting lost in their math that has no connection to reality.

Its all very simple.... not complicated string theory.

What it means is you can use tech to cross that barrier. In a charged bubble at least. Need to shield from contact with antimatter particles.

Also means its likely acceleration isnt required. ie teleportation.

Translation: Stargate...

Not gonna be silly spinning rings like in the movie... gonna be extreme high voltage charges at the right frequencies that can use the harmonics factor...

Like breaking the sound barrier. But its the sound of the universe.

if theres a Coriolis force that spins a near infinite number of atomic particles areound their nucleus indefinitely, Theres another side to the Universe. its just that simple. The Universe rotates... more force....

its like the Yin-Yang symbol. And the sound of the universe like a Buddhist Ohm chant....

"Failure comes on the verge of success." (Tao)

and usually in Taoist statements, the inverse is also true; Success will come on the verge of failure.

What are we looking at besides failure and success?

And wouldnt we not want to contaminate the galaxy with our defects? Wouldnt we want to be known as trust worthy and invariably decent?

Anyone who thinks we are alone in an infinite Universe, is the definition of an idiot.

The reason we arent picking up radio frequency broadcasts is because it would be like us looking for pony express riders now....

Theyre on another frequency guys... one that pierces time and space. and gets there at the same instant you sent it, no matter what the distance is.

Einstein explained half.

The other half is like a mirror analogy.

Get your shit together guys... We're going places if we dont all kill each other over BS.

What is power and wealth compared to owning infinity?

mecpaw · 2019-07-03T08:42:39+00:00

I've just watched a documentary on how the Victorians built Britain. If it weren't for men the UK would've died of Cholera and Typhoid. I doubt no woman would be seen dead digging out those sewers.

[deleted] · 2019-07-03T15:18:47+00:00

Women don't care about the work, they just wait at the finish line.

or rather in 2019 thanks to feminism

Women don't care about the work they just wait at the finish line to claim all the glory.

[deleted] · 2019-07-03T10:06:10+00:00

All you need to do is ask google and its nothing, they only list inventions by women and most of them were probably gifted to them by their husbands worked on as part of a team or stolen.

Sqaguy · 2019-07-03T10:32:35+00:00

Didn't you know that behind every good man is a good woman? Because feminists want you to know that they actually built this.

FutureIsManAndRobot · 2019-07-03T10:33:34+00:00

This can be summer by looking at today's India and China, one is more matriarchal (although not entirely), the other is more patriarchal (here again not entirely), very revealing.

Xaynr · 2019-07-03T18:40:45+00:00

One of the few posts I actually disagree with.

Most structures of note across the globe were built off of slave labour.

Next_Flow1 · 2019-07-03T09:45:32+00:00

There's a word for this feeling, its called sonder, the realization that everyone around you has lived a life just as complex as your own, its truly humbling to live in a world that wouldn't exist without the millions or billions of different people who devoted their dreams to creating stuff we take for granted, like indoor plumbing or the internet

tizertiger · 2019-07-03T10:01:31+00:00

In caves but with nice curtains

EndlessPatriotism · 2019-07-04T04:45:00+00:00

Its really crazy when you think about it, 99% of construction workers are men, meaning 99% of buildings are built by men. Its likely a bigger numbers than that though, like 99.999999.

Twistypete · 2019-07-04T12:43:27+00:00

And now men have been robbed of that purpose. There are no more families to support, just thots that cheat on you while you raise someone else's kid.

Men with a purpose can build an advanced civilization from sand, clay and sticks. Men without a purpose will tear it down with their bare hands.

Fantoche_Dreemurr · 2019-07-03T10:50:57+00:00

Everything. If it were up to women we'd be doing agricultural starvation. Can't take risks and experiment. Gotta stay small and petty otherwise the other women will conspire.

RealBiggly · 2019-07-03T11:33:36+00:00

OK, this deffo needs my copy-pasta to go with it:

In the past, CHILDREN WERE MEN'S PROPERTY.

That worked beautifully and was the foundation for Western civilization.

In nature, men laze around without much interest or stake in anything; women do most of the daily menial work while the males would only go hunting once in a while.

The women flock around a few alpha males, ignoring most of the men. Now and then the men form gangs, for a sense of identity. Those gangs will occasionally rape women and kill the occasional alpha. That's good, wholesome nature. Yum.

In patriarchal civilization men made a pact - one woman, one man and HIS children. Every man has a chance at having his very own lady, his very own children. Sure, he still had to compete, but competing among his peers for the best women, not competing against the top few alpha males. This was a fantastic win-win for everyone, as each woman had her own protector and provider, as did HIS children.

Children could afford longer childhoods to learn and understand the world, developing maturity before setting up home for themselves (probably as part of a young couple).

Women could specialize in their stuff, and could relax knowing they had someone to care, provide and protect them and the children, even after her good looks fade away ("The Wall")

Men, who then had a long-term stake and future to care about, could specialize in their stuff. And boy did they ever!

EVERYTHING you see around you, from the chair you're sitting on, the electricty powering your phone or computer, EVERYTHING, from the clean water you drink to the toilet and entire sewage system that whisks it away for you, was invented, developed and built by MEN.

Men who had a stake, men who had families and a reason to get up early, work late, often at a job they hated, often a job that was dangerous, cold, hot, filthy or just mind-numbingly boring, but they did it. For life.

Ask those men why they worked so hard, they'd dig out their wallet and show you pictures of their children, their wife.

This is the absolute FOUNDATION of any civilization. It's a foundation for agriculture, money, religion or anything else. Patriarchy, in the sense of male ownership of children, i.e. the social recognition and legal support for fatherhood, is THE KEY.

Around the time of the Industrial Revolution women started saying kids should be with women, because the woman did NOT want to have to go work in the factories alongside the men. With power and electricity there's no reason they couldn't, as muscle-power was no longer needed. So women, who had previously worked alongside the man in the little homestead or whatever, were now pushing that there should be 'separate spheres', with the 'work sphere' (eww!) for men, and the 'home sphere' (yay!) for women "and their children".

Despite their best efforts, and then the 180 degree turn they took when socialist offered them the vote and they declared themselves "deprived of work" (!) the laws and traditions held things fairly steady, until around the 1970's when the man's ownership and presumed custody of kids after divorce was abolished entirely, and we swung the opposite way, automatically giving the kids to the woman.

That was the moment that Western Civilization truly developed the fatal cancer of feminism.

Note that Islam gives the children to the mother too, but only until the children reach the age of 'discernment', which means old enough to dress themselves and follow directions, such as around 7 years old. Then they must be given back to their rightful guardian, the father.

In the West, we now let the woman never give the man his child or children back.

Of course since the woman gets the kids she now "needs" the man's house, and she "needs" the man's present and future income, even his pension. Which means the only thing she loses from divorce is the man she wants to get rid of. In the past she was free to leave the man's house and his kids if she wanted, but naturally she didn't want to without really good reason.

The man certainly didn't want to be left with the kids and nobody to care for them, so he had strong incentive to make things work too. The result was strong, stable marriages that generally worked well, raising good, well-adjusted kids. This worked well for literally thousands of years.

We only asked 2 things from men and from women:

From men we asked them to not rape or seduce another man's woman, and to take financial and other responsibility for his family. If he could resist sexing any other single women too that'd be great, but if he did and they got pregnant he was responsible. It would also be considered grounds for the wife to divorce him, in which case he had to continue to support her financially, so again a very strong incentive to behave.

From women we asked that before marriage they don't screw around, then remain faithful to their husband after marriage while looking after his home and children.

Experience shows that women that do screw around before marriage reduce their own ability to pair-bond, weaken other people's marriage, and tend to get pregnant without any willing husband, thus producing 'bastards', badly-behaved kids and they and those kids become destructive parasites upon society.

The "patriarchy" that feminists hate is simply that - male ownership of the children and the expectation of female chastity, the dreaded "double standard", where we HARNESS and encourage men's horniness to build civilization, and SUPPRESS women's horniness to ensure each man has a chance of his own family.

The feminism cancer means that today around 80% of women are chasing the top 20% of men, before settling down for some betabux provider that they will probably divorce, taking his home, kids and income. It is a cancer that is literally killing Western Civilization and the European races, as their birth rate is now far below replacement level.

It is being helped along by Cultural Marxists (political correctness etc) but it doesn't really matter who or why. The point is that we let feminists kill patriarchy, which means they killed Western Civilization itself. The fatal wound was inflicted in the 70's but something so massive takes awhile to notice it's dead.

"Woman is the enemy of civilization." Freud.

The dying civilization is now being replaced at an accelerating rate by a patriarchy, as always happens throughout history.

The patriarchy replacing Western Civilization is obviously Islam.

Now gonna go copy this, as I'm getting real tired of having to keep typing it...

Anyway, in summary, if you bring a kid into this world all you are doing is giving some woman a meal-ticket and validation. YOU will not get to enjoy nurturing, teaching and seeing your child grow into your legacy. In reality the kid will likely be raised to hate you, due to the lies told to it by the mother to justify why she kicked you out of the home you're still paying for.

Most, not some, most, marriages end in divorce, and if you have kids SHE will get them, not you.

Years ago some female comedyc*nt came out with the joke "Is this the man I want to pay me alimony and see my kids every other weekend?"

It's no joke, that's the best-case scenario for most fathers today. Not some, MOST.

When a game is to heavily rigged against you, the only winning move it to walk away and not play.

MGTOW.

silentwamon · 2019-07-03T12:02:26+00:00

That reminds of this family guy episode Scene

Sid_Vichous · 2019-07-03T16:45:15+00:00

God made the Great Outdoors, Men made the Great Indoors.

MrMister1994 · 2019-07-03T18:34:58+00:00

Men are shit! They only invented electricity, airplanes, cars, boats and modern society!

ClubZlut · 2019-07-03T23:08:15+00:00

This is true. And then the family unit got nuked.

And look where we are now.

RanchDevil90 · 2019-07-03T23:54:51+00:00

Specifically white men

TacticalPolonium · 2019-07-04T03:53:24+00:00

This is why they love feminizing men.

itstreasonthen1986 · 2019-07-03T15:14:46+00:00

You're goddamn right it is.

_M_O_A_ · 2019-07-03T12:24:05+00:00

men built it all. women are in the process of destroying it all

lord_have_merci · 2019-07-03T14:12:37+00:00

i aint no feminist but this isnt the most accurate thing ever. it 'may' apply to 'murica, but thats probably as far as it goes. and given the resources had been given to women in the past (education, rights etc), ofcourse they wont do shit. also, keep in mind that gender is a construct. we have, in the past, conditioned women to be... girly. give the newborn girl a barbie doll and a new born boy a battery powered toy car. now, dont get me wrong. the girl being given a barbie will start thinking a certain way and if she were the dominant, we'd be fucked. but if she had been given a toy car, theres a more likely chance that she might actually explore its capabilities. (i got into electronics and making stuff coz i broke alot of those toy cars and etc). this is just one of the pathways, keeping in mind that a child's mindset is influenced by many things.

-The_Weeb_Lord- · 2019-07-03T17:49:14+00:00

Men built cows? I had no idea lol

leviathanch · 2019-07-03T09:59:35+00:00

That's actually a redundant question.

See. If there wouldn't be men, there would also be no women, because it needs two sexes to procreate.

So without men, the humans in general wouldn't exist, neither can humanity survive without the other sex.

If humans would go extinct, earth would just go back to its natural pristine condition after a while.

The question is more, where the world would be without people having the guts to stick up and make the impossible possible, like Tessla, Schroedinger, Eifel and so on.

The bitches nowadays think that they're so smart choosing the betas, think they can make our genes go extinct for not subduing ourselves to their demands for changing a meaningful and productive life into a meaningless and pitiful existence solely for their monetary enrichment.

Well. And that's where the beauty of the male achievement called science comes in.

We don't need bitches anymore soon, because we soon have cloning.

ass-my-eat · 2019-07-03T05:27:49+00:00

[removed]

Title	Men are something else. Without men, where would the world be?
Author	iamrivensky
Upvotes	1928
Comments	176
Date	July 3, 2019 4:57 AM UTC (7 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/c8jwty/men_are_something_else_without_men_where_would/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/men-are-something-else-without-men-where-would-the.435365 https://theredarchive.com/post/435365

Comments

If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.