Saw this on IG

Infinitewisdom1984 · 2018-10-24T17:57:22+00:00

Ah consent videos. Next we'll have drawn up contracts on which specific movements and acts are okay and which aren't. lmao I can see the headlines now,

"woman sues man for breach of consent contract after tip of penis slips and touches asshole"

"man counter-sues, claiming woman purposely touched his wiener with her asshole while also sticking her finger up his ass"

"Man is sentenced to 10 years in prison for breach of sexual contract. Woman deemed 'unable to give consent via signature'."

ideserveall · 2018-10-24T18:23:47+00:00

I feel like the courts still won't give much of a shit because "consent can be revoked"

Why_should_I_mayne · 2018-10-24T17:02:54+00:00

lol was a lawyer present on and during the act?

jason1009 · 2018-10-24T20:09:02+00:00

The Chappelle Show was way ahead of it's time.....from the late 90s.......

https://vimeo.com/183089808

cleats4u · 2018-10-24T19:19:32+00:00

What about ongoing consent the feminists put in the legal language. The whole encounter must be video taped or a legal rape may have occurred every 5 seconds! You could rape a woman 100 times during the same sexual encounter. That is 2500 years in prison! Outside of that you need your attorney present during copulation.

LJHova · 2018-10-24T21:40:35+00:00

A few highlights from the article with some thoughts on the logic or lack thereof.

"I’m a militant advocate of better consent education, and the employment of enthusiastic giving and requesting of consent in bed, but still, this felt odd."

So she's all about consent, but feels odd when asked to provide proof that she's consenting to sexual intercourse. Either she's not a sex-positive as she claims she is or she simply doesn't like the fact that she's now more accountable for her actions. The hamster doesn't like the fact that it can't shift the blame and protect itself from feeling icky, so it momentarily stopped running on its wheel.

"It’s easy to understand why having a record of a sexual partner’s consent would feel important. But the implication is that those in a position of power are the ones who need protection, and that’s just not true."

This is an odd statement all around. She's poisoning the well by suggesting that it is the men who are in the position of power and then using that false supposition to run away with some rather dubious thoughts. I truly logical approach would be to ask who really has the upper hand in this situation. Assuming that the guy is not a rapist, and despite what most feminist want us to believe the vast majority of men or not, then it could easily be argued that the person he's having intercourse with is the one with the power. Thanks to the hysteria whipped up by feminists, women can now claim sexual assault even if they gave consent originally. The #believeher and #metoo movements have put the Accused at the disadvantage and have put due process into serious Jeopardy. It's naive at best, but mostly intentional dishonesty, to claim that the person asking for consent is the one with the power. That person is actually the most vulnerable.

"In reality, the vitriol that victims of rape and sexual assault are subject to is enough to put anyone off making a false report. "

Again, she's making an assertion without any evidence to back it up. We know from statistics and police reports that. Claims of rape and sexual assault are relatively common. The numbers vary based on the jurisdiction, time of year, population involved, Etc. However, false allegations of sexual assault range from 10% to as high as 40 or 50%.

" So what’s the easiest way not to need that consent recording? Just don’t rape someone."

Again, her lack of logical thinking, has resulted in a fallacy. In this case, she's presented the old folks dichotomy fallacy, insisting that there are only two options don't rape and be fine or rape and potentially be accused. Unfortunately, there are multiple other options including rape and nothing happens or, the most worrisome for men, get consent and don't rape but still get accused by a woman who later regrets her actions or simply wants to the exact Revenge.

"What kind of sex is this person consenting to, what protection do they want to use? Most crucially, though, consent can be withdrawn at any time. "

And here we get to the heart of the matter. Even if you recorded consent video, it isn't going to do much, because the woman is simply going to claim that while she can send it the sex she didn't consent to a particular kind of sex. She'll claim that she only expected you to thrust 100 times and you thrusted a hundred and ten times, thereby violating the balance of her consent and becoming a rapist. She also makes the false claim that consent can be withdrawn at any time. This isn't true. Consent cannot be withdrawn, for instance, after the sexual act is completed. You can't retroactively withdraw consent, but that's precisely what the women want to be able to do. They want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to be able to have sex and also be the victim because being the victim is the popular thing to do. It's like wearing yoga pants and drinking Starbucks was 5 years ago. The new trend is to be a victim and it will eventually give way to something else, but in the meantime thousands if not hundreds of thousands of innocent male lives are being destroyed.

TheImpossible1 · 2018-10-24T20:52:12+00:00

"but relationships with wymyn are not a minefield" - r/inceltears

Sol_Install · 2018-10-24T17:40:31+00:00

Too much nonsense.

DarthSchadenfreude · 2018-10-24T22:03:29+00:00

Fuck all THOTs, which at this point is close to 100% of all women. (Or rather DON'T FUCK THEM)

So much simpler to use a fleshlight, and I don't have to worry about incurable STI's or #meToo, or RapeByMeansOfRegrettingSex.

When I can afford it, I will get a sex doll.

Shortmanking · 2018-10-24T21:32:49+00:00

Bro if I gotta do all this nonsense I'll just go get a fleshlight or a bottle of lotion.

tramese · 2018-10-24T20:10:44+00:00

don't forget this also has to be passed through senate and congress before valid.

MrBluePill · 2018-10-25T01:46:33+00:00

Asking for consent is creepy, Not asking is rape. The only winning move Is not to play.

lulz3r · 2018-10-24T19:17:21+00:00

It still seems like an unnecessary risk. Maybe a before and after video, but even then.

DankoJones84 · 2018-10-25T01:37:07+00:00

Remember when Dave Chappelle did that skit about "the love contract"? Welp.. It's not a joke any more.

MiddleAgedMGTOW · 2018-10-24T18:55:14+00:00

CYA. It’s a smart play.

Pacifist11 · 2018-10-25T04:12:25+00:00

https://youtu.be/urS8GmwmeWQ?t=52s

BitcoinBoffin · 2018-10-24T23:10:42+00:00

Canada already torpedoed this https://youtu.be/hrYuEC_kxtc

GemStarCN21 · 2018-10-25T00:13:15+00:00

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

What the fuck is going on??

Btw here's the Cherry 2000 dating contract scene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=urS8GmwmeWQ

LexGrom · 2018-10-25T02:14:17+00:00

Worthless: as soon as it'll catch up, it'll be outlawed/made irrelevant

Just don't engage

Roastie_haiku_bot · 2018-10-25T02:47:33+00:00

A blue-balled judge will throw out any video if the foid tearfully explains she felt 'threatened', and was forced to do it.

I-am-the-lul · 2018-10-25T07:35:37+00:00

The very fact that consent can be retroactively withdrawn 30 seconds, 30 days or even 30 years after the act means that from a legal standpoint, all sex is rape, I suggest you go monk, wank off to porn or get a doll if you must get your rocks off.

felizmentefeliz · 2018-10-25T14:13:57+00:00

I hope some day all men will be awaken, the only way wahmen will have sex is with a dildo, and the only job they’ll get is surrogacy. Kind of more twisted Handmaid’s Tale.

badaboomxx · 2018-10-25T15:07:49+00:00

Why risking it all, just don't play the game.

cleats4u · 2018-10-24T19:19:20+00:00

What about ongoing consent the feminists put in the legal language. The whole encounter must be video taped or a legal rape may have occurred every 5 seconds! You could rape a woman 100 times during the same sexual encounter. That is 2500 years in prison! Outside of that you need your attorney present during copulation.

cleats4u · 2018-10-24T19:19:27+00:00

What about ongoing consent the feminists put in the legal language. The whole encounter must be video taped or a legal rape may have occurred every 5 seconds! You could rape a woman 100 times during the same sexual encounter. That is 2500 years in prison! Outside of that you need your attorney present during copulation.

tramese · 2018-10-24T19:30:56+00:00