I've been following various blogs in the manosphere for a while now. While I have recently leaned more and more toward mgtow ideals, I still hold this adorable sentiment that the 3 primary schools of mra pua and mgtow could eventually learn to disagree while simultaneously holding one another in higher esteem since they are all at the very least unplugged men so to speak. What do you guys think?

As far as I can tell, these are basically the barriers stopping the different segments from getting along:

(MRA) - believes PUAs give the mrm a bad name due to outsiders conflating the two and because they promote deceitful and manipulative behavior  against women in order to get laid. Puas shame men who aren't getting laid and push for narrow standards of masculinity. Mrm is increasingly egalitarian and isn't about alienating or treating women badly

  • believes MGTOW  have a fundamentally negative view of women as being exploitive and adversarial towards men by nature. Mras are big on distancing themselves from what could be perceived as misogyny and also welcome women's aid and voice, since they are pushing more for egalitarianism than for pure pro male ideals

(PUA) - view the Mras shedding light on male issues as playing victim. Since men are strong and get shit done they should never need to appeal to govt or society for help with male issues. Mras show weakness by complaining and arguing the merits of caring for men. They should just be more masculine and take charge...( that's how it seems anyway. Apologies pua are the ones I least identify with so it's hard to sum up what they actually are getting at)

-view MGTOW  as low smv males who gnash their teeth over their inability to get laid. Puas view the very attempt at rejecting women and the rules of the sexual marketplace to be a futile endeavor.  They see getting laid and using women as the best counter to an increasingly misandrist society.  They see mgtow as having given up, given in, and resigning to porn and video games. To them this is pathetic

(MGTOW ) -considers PUAS to be essentially trapped in gynocentric behavior, molding themselves around women's base urges and taking undue risks in order to bed women and emulate alpha behavior. They push a warped and self-destructive idea of masculinity while appealing to semi traditionalist notions of men being men and women being women. They insist that gratifying their instinctual drives is the finest endeavor for a man

  • consider MRAs to be fighting a fruitless losing battle against an unsympathetic worldwide view of mens issues. Also they attempt to play politics and gain favor with masses which requires them to dilute their message and not be offensive to women/tradcons. In the end they are neither taken seriously nor listened to

So that's my take on what the different groups think of eachother. Do you guys think we could ever focus on benifiting males and looking out for eachother inspite of our differing views?