TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

A Philosopher's Hoax Embarrassed Several Academic Journals (and feminist theologians and academic centres controlled by feminism). Was It Satire or Fraud?

Imnotmrabut

January 26, 2019
52 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://psmag.com/education/a-philosophers-hoax-embarrassed-several-academic-journals-was-it-satire-or-fraud
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A Philosopher's Hoax Embarrassed Several Academic Journals (and feminist theologians and academic centres controlled by feminism). Was It Satire or Fraud?
Author

Imnotmrabut

Upvotes 52
Comments 13
Date January 26, 2019 3:51 PM UTC
(7 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ak1ys0/a_philosophers_hoax_embarrassed_several_academic/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-philosophers-hoax-embarrassed-several-academic.1182149
https://theredarchive.com/post/1182149
Red Pill terms in post
feminismfeminist
Top posts by Imnotmrabut

Girls if you hit, slap, belittle, kick, punch, choke, throw things at, or control your boyfriends, you are the abuser.

17752 upvotes
February 24, 2017
/r/MensRights

Telling a feminist the truth.

6698 upvotes
August 22, 2018
/r/MensRights

Irony Time - The Red Pill Wins "Women In Film Award"

5929 upvotes
May 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Woman who tortured, killed man was featured speaker at Women's March - guilty of second degree murder and two counts of first degree kidnapping

5059 upvotes
January 24, 2017
/r/MensRights

40% of young men contemplating suicide never tell anyone how they are feeling. #NotEveryDayIsInternationalMensDay

4956 upvotes
November 15, 2016
/r/MensRights

If You Start To Humanise Your Enemy, You In Turn May Be Dehumanised By Your Community

4495 upvotes
May 15, 2017
/r/MensRights

Eliminating feminist teacher bias erases boys’ falling grades, study finds

4262 upvotes
December 28, 2017
/r/MensRights

Ladies And Gentlemen - Feminism, The Circus That Never Ends. P¬))

3849 upvotes
August 26, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]rooster-one4 23 points24 points25 points 7 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It was neither satire or fraud - it was a scientific approach to demonstrate untrustworthiness in academia.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 5 points6 points7 points 7 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. It's not "satire", "fraud", a "hoax", a "stunt" or "research data fabrication".

Rather what they did was legitimate journalistic investigation and enquiry, using perfectly reasonable and proportional methods, to expose the real fraud and data fabrication.

[–]Doing_It_In_The_Butt 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, I am happy this happened, but arguably it was not ethical if you judge it by the standards of modern day ethics boards. This is not because of femnazis but because social expirements ethics standards are pretty tight across the board.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

social expirements ethics standards are pretty tight across the board.

Interesting point — but it wasn’t an “experiment” either! That would be an absurd and deliberately distorted view of it. It was totally acceptable and moral journalistic action to expose appalling hatred.

These people have been caught red-handed, literally publishing (or agreeing to publish), pure Nazi ideology, from the very mouth and pen of Adolf Hitler himself. No wonder they are screeching and wailing, and trying every trick in the book.

[–]Doing_It_In_The_Butt 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I tend to agree with you. But I wanted to offer the somewhat logical counterpoint.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You made an interesting point that I had not considered. Thank you.

What is interesting, is that the Femnazis (literally) will try and use such contortions and interpretations to defame and attack those who have so clearly exposed their evil.

[–]Thuban 16 points17 points18 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He made them rightly look like fools. This is petty payback with the only cudgel they can use.

[–]PeonSupreme 11 points12 points13 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If he had written a straightforward piece about the crisis of intellectual corruption in academic publishing, it would have made little if any impact, if it had even gotten published at all. He sacrificed his career for the greater good.

[–]ralphswanson 6 points7 points8 points 7 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

His critics are tenured professors who insist on displaying their credentials but refuse to disclose their names because open debate might result in 'death threats'. But only to them. They are cowards. They want debate to be limited to the academic journals that they control. They are paid well to criticize others but cry foul when they are criticized. They are privileged professional victims who are paid to push their self-serving politics. It is they who are destroying their profession.

[–]BachKunst 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It was REASON and LOGIC

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Neither. It was a demonstration that the peer review process is broken in the liberal arts.

[–]wabu_95 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would they even know if he didnt tell them?

[–]Zwartehond65 0 points1 point2 points 7 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

F

T_T7

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter