CDC NISVS data visualized using the CDC's definition of rape vs a gender-neutral definition of rape.

63daddy · 2022-09-01T18:49:50+00:00

Funny how one gets a totally different story when one doesn’t use biased definitions.

(Which is of course why they keep using biased definitions).

CawlinAlcarz · 2022-09-01T19:01:24+00:00

Heh... Data SURELY is beautiful.

Thank you for posting this, OP. When I can get another free award, it's yours!

ExMuzzy · 2022-09-02T01:28:11+00:00

Locked and deleted from the sub by delicate mods over there

themolestedsliver · 2022-09-02T16:34:17+00:00

This was a great thread and a lot of Feminists showed their true colors here (which is why comments were locked.)

"Why are you blaming feminisms?" Because notable Feminists and Feminists Organizations lobbied to gender the legal language of rape. It's clear Feminism only cares about female issues and I'm TIRED of pretending otherwise.

mgtowolf · 2022-09-02T03:00:15+00:00

So beautiful, that mods felt the need to shut down discussion on it apparently. Here is my surprised face

Leading_Direction_84 · 2022-09-02T01:50:24+00:00

True, irrefutable data is beautiful.

mykoiy · 2022-09-02T15:37:22+00:00

r/MensIssuesProgress

turbulance4 · 2022-09-03T00:02:42+00:00

I got some pretty good traction on the post before it was locked.

AgeofAmnesia · 2022-09-03T15:19:45+00:00

Rape is defined as including an object, and lack of consent of the person on the receiving end (with no regard to any guardian giving consent by proxy - interesting).

Rape includes penetration of *some* part, right? Can it be said to be *any* part?

If we hold that rape can include any cylindrical item, a lack of consent, and (assuming) it could be on any part (or even at least genital), then what we have defined, by those standards, that infant circumcision is rape.

The skin needs to be torn away, which requires (classically) a fingernail, or a "probe" meant to tear the skin. That is a form of penetration of genitals, by an object, without consent of the person (only proxy consent by a parent or guardian who has not communicated the will of the infant - and can't).

What if we now included that every man who was forcibly cut in the USA is, by definition, a rape victim? This would mean roughly 75% of American men should be classified as rape victims. Obvious overlap would exist, but even then, 100,000,000 men being listed as victims might sound....well...kinda like America has built itself on the suffering of men.

Title	CDC NISVS data visualized using the CDC's definition of rape vs a gender-neutral definition of rape.
Author	Imdefender
Upvotes	63
Comments	13
Date	September 1, 2022 6:31 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/x3ex6d/cdc_nisvs_data_visualized_using_the_cdcs/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/cdc-nisvs-data-visualized-using-the-cdcs.1130464 https://theredarchive.com/post/1130464

Comments