~ archived since 2018 ~

Destroy Men through Promiscuity

vegansoymilk · 2023-09-12T02:35:45+00:00

Video provides an unusual take on the objectives of feminism. Destroy men by destroying monogamy and increased promiscuity of women....

vegansoymilk

September 12, 2023

8 upvotes

/r/MensRights

Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	Destroy Men through Promiscuity
Author	vegansoymilk
Upvotes	8
Comments	5
Date	September 12, 2023 2:35 AM UTC (2 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/16gfbuv/destroy_men_through_promiscuity/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/destroy-men-through-promiscuity.1231539 https://theredarchive.com/post/1231539

Comments

[–]pilotlet 2 points3 points4 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]MembershipWooden6160 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This comments sums it up. You'll hear how women like different types of men - no, that's actually men. In fact if you let men to choose with their d*cks, they'll choose harems of women instead of a single woman, despite how attractive she is.

On the other hand, go and see what 100 different women think - they'll basically find the same traits attractive and with just about the same emphasis on similar set of crucial traits. And if you let them to choose with their p*ssies, they'll all want to pair off with that "best guy available". Every single one of these women will tell you she's having a "specific taste in men" but you'll learn just how stupid this claim is.

These patterns are exactly what drives the common norms of you having to be proactive, hit on women, play your "game", along with the fact that women are the ones getting pregnant, not men. If a woman opts out, other men will STILL be hitting on her, saying "hi", whatever, trying to hit it off - even if she's married, especially if she's active and puts specific type of content on social media (there are plenty of women posting no pics of her guy they even happen to live together, or posting pics in short skirts, out with her friends, so on). If a man opts out and doesn't take proactive role, that's it. He's out of the dating game. This is why you DON'T buy into what women tell you. Stop chatting up other women and they won't be trying to hit it off with you. Women don't need that, they just need to be "available" or give such notion and some guy will tend to try their luck.

Now these common concepts may not apply to every single man or woman, but they cover a significant majority of men and women and it's stupid to even discuss it, it's like we keep on repeating ourselves. The only issues feminism and hypergamy have is that people desire smaller families now in general, i.e. less children. Thing that's also making it easier for men in our age when compared to the past is also willingness of more women to have kids by different daddies - which is why it's primarily other women who shun such woman, while men also don't tend to stick for long.. and we have that issue with massive manhunt after men unwilling to be the daddies.

I also don't subscribe to that argument how "women don't need men today" - we are witnessing an unprecedented age of ever-increasing necessity for parental investment in order for the kid(s) to be competitive with other kids. I am aware that single parents can do great, but it's undeniable fact that lacking one parent, even more, lacking the whole side of relatives from that parent's side, is a serious drawback for children's future success on so many levels. I am aware that certain people are simply within the very top of the society, but they are a rare occasion... and you'll also notice that these people are far more likely to come out of household of parents who were and stayed together, as well as other of their relatives, and they STILL tend to stack the deck for their kids by mingling with the very top class in order to ensure they stay there.

So feminism not only serves as a way to f*ck up men of lower class, but also to f*ck up women of lower class as an elitist movement, by ensuring that these women's kids aren't as competitive to their own - because women of top class do not follow the same advice they advise to i.e. working class women.

[–]jessi387 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]pilotlet 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]MembershipWooden6160 0 points1 point2 points 2 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's too much of a "black pill" stuff right there. Thing is that, as women age, their options shrink. New ,younger women are sought after as better than they are. The issue is that no sane man would decide to be a parent with women who go with the notion to f*ck around. And it's better for them not to. So it's actually tough luck for men who want to be parents, NOT for men who either want to get laid and it's not so bad even for guys who'd pump and dump.

This is why baby mamas with kids from different fathers are so much hated by women - men only hate the notion of staying with her, but plenty of men are willing to make yet another one and move on.

The notion of men having harems of women only holds while these women are NOT having kids today - because most men and women actually prefer smaller family size and it's getting smaller and smaller. This is a factor that basically squeezes the hypergamy game as well with each year. I am surprised just how many guys literally buy into certain notions while disregarding these common trends.