TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

"Equal outcomes have replaced equality of opportunity" (from r/Canada)

jennydaman

November 5, 2017
177 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/equal-outcomes-have-replaced-equality-of-opportunity/article36825364/?ref=https://www.theglobeandmail.com&service=mobile
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title "Equal outcomes have replaced equality of opportunity" (from r/Canada)
Author

jennydaman

Upvotes 177
Comments 17
Date November 5, 2017 5:25 PM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7ayvqt/equal_outcomes_have_replaced_equality_of/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/equal-outcomes-have-replaced-equality-of.1174450
https://theredarchive.com/post/1174450
Red Pill terms in post
beta
Top posts by jennydaman

Being a woman increases likelihood of landing job interviews by 48.3% (from r/dataisbeautiful)

2515 upvotes
January 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Apparently women deserve compensation for "emotional labor" (housework)

46 upvotes
September 28, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]rifinwono4 32 points33 points34 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I think diversity based on economic backgrounds is the only kind of diversity that makes sense. Poor should be given a leg up because them being poor automatically denies them equality of opportunity.

[–]dukunt 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I'd agree with that. The wealthy can and do have the option to buy their degree or get their foot in the door through daddy's connections. Poor have one option, to be good enough and stand out from the crowd. Had an acquaintance who did her masters of education at Harvard. The tuition (or cost) was in the realm of 100000$ paid for by her daddy. Tottally beyond the reach of average folk. Even if I sold everything I own and a kidney or 2 I'd still come up short by 98000$.

[–]rifinwono4 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

man.. it's not even that they can buy their degrees. i am from india. i am from a very privileged background for indians and from a fairly privileged background if i compared myself to the average american. this despite the fact that my family's income while i was a kid was just 200$ per month at 1 point. the reason is, i always had a good family, went to good schools, interacted with good ambitious people all around me and learnt well and had the world pretty much at my feet when i completed schooling. the only incomplete thing was that i was still not very rich, and during my work life, i managed to get rich with almost a degree of inevitability to it. so, i realize the privilege i had was completely real and it is something that most people, whether in india or the US, don't actually have. and without all of those things, i still might have done well for myself (i am academically gifted), but there's a much greater risk that my life would have been derailed. and that's the real disadvantage that poor people have. the current system in the first world countries does nothing to give a leg up to the poor people from bad families. all they aspire for is to get into a stable job which allows them to make ends meet while they carry on with their lives. so, encouraging these poorer students (with possibly slightly lower academic abilities) to get into universities over richer students who've had their life handed to them on a platter with good schooling/tuitions/stable study environment etc.. is hardly controversial.

[–]dukunt 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I was the first generation of my family to go to university. My father had a grade 6 education. I know his biggest dream was to give his kids just a little better life than he had, and win the lotttery but that never happened. I'm glad that he lived long enough to see me become a teacher. And died before he saw my life collapse. I came from Canadian poor. Which I know doesn't compare to India poor. What drives me crazy is the level of nepotism in every profession. I knew 2 girls in teachers college (best friends) who both walked into full time teaching positions in the same school board where the one girl's mother was principal. They claim the mother had nothing to do with it but this was in Ontario at a time when there was a 3 year waiting list just ro become a substitute teacher and every teaching position recieved 600 applicants from people who had done their time substitute teaching. It's not just teaching, nepotism is rampant everywhere. And the higher up you get the worse it is. Politics is just one big boys club. And now the girls are allowed to play as well but it will never be truly open to everyone. Look at Trudeau our current priminister. If his father wasnt a priminister he'd still be a snowboard instructor. Conections are all that matter.

[–]SpikedGIraffe 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Teaching positions is all about who you know, not what you know.

It is the same way in Alberta.

[–]dukunt 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sadly I now live in Alberta.

[–]the-capitan 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is a myth. i know multiple kids who went to ivy league. almost no one pays for it anymore because they're given grants by the endowments at the school. the endowments at these schools are so large and the competition for elite students is so high that they waived the bulk or all tuition and just slam the students on the back end for donations. also, because the money comes in as a donation rather than fee-for-service, the income is not taxable, saving the university ridiculous amounts.

[–]the-capitan 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

the problem i have with this is that like with affirmative action's failure, advancing someone can only go as far as merit. if you have two of the same caliber people, you should pick the less fortunate one because they overcame higher barriers. but if you have a better candidate who is a rich white straight male, and a lesser candidate who is poorer/minority, you should take the rich white straight male... not because he's a rich white straight male, but because he's more qualified and the outcomes are just better.

stanford+UCLA have already admitted that affirmative action is a failure that doesn't withstand even the most basic of criticisms. in fact, they found that affirmative action actually produces LESS minority successes than race blind scenarios... when you're flooding programs with minorities for the sake of diversity, minorities do worse because minorities who do have merit/qualifications get bumped up a tier. instead of being in the class that they're qualified for, they're one tier up and not qualified to be there. this means that they're walking in the door at the bottom of their class, every single fucking time, when if they were in the group they were actually qualified for, they would have had a fighting chance.

you CANNOT fix any sort of inequality of starting circumstances by bumping people up into groups they're not qualified for. reality does not work like that.

[–]skapit 16 points17 points18 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The "equal outcome" myth is common when discussing SJW's but I see little evidence for it.

Feminists are not asking for equal workplace deaths, equal sentencing or equal parenting rights. And feminist politicians are certainly not asking for equal pay with the men who keep their lights on and their toilet flushing or the women who do their nails and clean their houses.

I understand where the myth came from -- SJW's claim to want eg an equal number of women in STEM and politics and a few other fields. But that's a fairly narrow definition of "equal outcome" and even here they are hypocrites -- they don't ask for an equal number of male teachers, nurses, veterinarians etc.

[–]the-capitan 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

it's the apex fallacy. they're demanding equal outcomes in the good stuff, but completely ignoring the bad. they want social workers and receptionists to be paid the same as petroleum engineers. they want women admitted to engineering positions regardless of capability to do actual engineering... where software or a bridge or an engine that the engineer is building really gives zero fucks about the gender or race of the engineer. they want women put in board seat positions regardless of business experience or accomplishments.

[–]skapit 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's the apex fallacy.

Yep.

[–]jennydaman 3 points4 points5 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I just love the eloquence of the title.

The subject is pressing too, I'm a student.

[–]Dnile1000BC 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think that is right either. It's better outcomes for women or it's sexism.

If equal outcome was truly the goal, why don't we see action to redress balance of men and women in college?

[–]Lrellok 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am going to do a video on this later, but the short version is the equality of opportunity is a completely incoherent concept that has no basis in the real world.

To have equality of opportunity, you would need four things

1) Equality of Aptitudes (why is the most brilliant and inspired janitor not paid as much as the most brilliant and inspired basketball player?)

2) Equality of Capacity ( If there are 2 million 4.0 students but only 1 million college positions, what are the rest to do?)

3) Equality of Access (If i walk into a bank and ask for a small loan of a million dollars, would i get treated the same as Donald Trump?)

4) Equality of Station (It has now been repeatedly shown that low income student with good grades are less likely to graduate college then high income students with bad grades.)

That said, I agree with the posters below, the SJW movement is obviously not interested in equal anything, they wish merely to change who benefits from the inequality.

[–]yturijea 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I find this term very similar to the communism ideal. Everyone is dealt given the same, no matter if you are working 50 hours or 1 hour a week. The final result of this will of course be that no one brilliant will go to the university. I wonder what they will call the new institute for brilliant people actually researching useful subjects.

[–]dukunt 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

University.1 maybe?

[–]neveragoodtime 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What’s amazing is that they’ve convinced the world of an invisible and inherent racism and sexism that can only be corrected by a visible and explicit racism and sexism. It will be their own undoing, as merit will make its own path forward, and they will be diverse but left behind.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter