Here is the link to the original article that raises some great points about the absurdity of feminist expectations:

According to Laci Green, if she’s too drunk to drive, she’s too drunk to give consent. That standard ought to solve this overpopulation problem, eh? First of all, by who’s definition of too drunk to drive? In Canada that means .04 BAC, in the US it means .08 according to the law. Very few people actually consider these levels to be “drunk”, at least not to the extent that it pertains to the ability to consent to things.

Let’s extrapolate that a bit then. If a guy who has sex with a drunk woman is a rapist, then is the store clerk who sells her something a thief? I mean, she can’t consent, right? To take someone’s money without consent is theft (unless you’re the government, of course, social contracts and all).

If being drunk means she cannot consent to sex, then is buying her a drink when she’s already drunk, the moral equivalent of slipping her a Rohypnol? I mean, if she can’t consent to sex, then how can she consent to drinking?

If being drunk means she cannot consent to sex, then is letting her crash on your couch kidnapping? I mean, to take somebody somewhere without consent generally constitutes said felony.

If someone’s unconscious or throwing up, or otherwise obviously not in control of their faculties, we all pretty much understand that it’s not okay to take their clothes off and penetrate them. On the other hand, we all know that both sexes intentionally get drunk before having sex, specifically for the purpose of taking the edge off of what leads up to that experience. If I go out drinking with a woman, and she asks me for sex, she’s probably going to get it and that doesn’t make me a rapist. Drunk sex is fun, people engage in it all the time and they almost never cry rape afterwards. By Laci Green’s standard, upwards of 25% of the population are rape babies (I’m making that statistic up, but you can bet a lot of our parents were drunk when mom got pregnant).

Saying that a woman can’t consent to sex while drinking is the same thing as saying a man can’t be held responsible for forcing her if he’s been drinking. It’s a really pathetic effort to remove one from a position of responsibility. People make the choice to drink, and once they do, they are responsible for all their actions after that, sexual, financial, or otherwise. To get drunk, consent to sex, and then accuse the man of rape, makes the woman the predator in this equation. It happens all the time, and better men than I are in prison for this right now. It’s wrong. It’s violent. And something needs to be done to stop it from happening.