~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
dejour
[removed]
[–]dejour15 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I actually feel optimistic over the past week as Yoffe, Rosin and the Washington Post have been sympathetic to the MRM point of view about rape accusations.
The Marcottes of the world seem to be losing control of the dialogue.
And in my optimistic view, the more people speaking out, the more people will be willing to speak out. There may be an avalanche of people who have been scared into silence that might be prepared to speak on behalf of men.
[–]smokeybehr7 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is only because of the Rolling Stone gang-rape fiction backlash. If the story hadn't been outed as fake, then we wouldn't be seeing this swing back towards finding the truth and equality.
[–]fishingbatter10 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is a very long and researched article, and would've been started far before the backlash (and even far before the initial Rolling Stone report).
Having said that, Yoffe has never been an extreme feminist on these issues (she's also gotten a lot of grief for writing articles saying that young college women shouldn't drink so much and place themselves in potential dangerous situations), so this article isn't that out of character for her.
[–]dejour7 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree. I think they are capitalizing on the backlash by printing it now, but Yoffe has probably been working and thinking about this article for a while. Probably once she was vilified for suggesting that people should avoid drinking themselves into a stupor if they want to increase their chances of staying safe (and was disinvited from speaking at colleges), she probably started delving into this a little more.
[–]1TrueScotsman12 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I still hate the fact that all these articles have to start with insisting that there is a particular problem with rape on campuses. Perpetuating this lie means that we leave the door open for continued hysteria.
[–]xNOM9 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yeah seems just like more privileged white woman hysteria. This part jumped out at me:
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D–New York, is a co-sponsor of the bipartisan Campus Accountability and Safety Act, or CASA, expected to be voted on next year. The legislation would, among other things, require all colleges provide a confidential adviser to guide victims through the entire process of bringing an accusation while no guidance or assistance is mandated for the accused. Gillibrand said in announcing the legislation, “We should never accept the fact that women are at a greater risk of sexual assault as soon as they step onto a college campus. But today they are.”
This is one of the frequently made assertions about campus violence, but the evidence to back it up is lacking. Being young does make people more vulnerable to serious violent crime, including sexual assault; according to government statistics those aged 18 to 24 have the highest rates of such victimization. But most studies don’t compare the victimization rates of students to nonstudents of the same age. One recent paper that does make that comparison, “Violence Against College Women” by Callie Marie Rennison and Lynn Addington, compares the crime experienced by college students and their peers who are not in college, using data from the National Crime Victimization Survey. What the researchers found was the opposite of what Gillibrand says about the dangers of campuses: “Non-student females are victims of violence at rates 1.7 times greater than are college females,” the authors wrote, and this greater victimization holds true for sex crimes: “Even if the definition of violence were limited to sexual assaults, these crimes are more pervasive for young adult women who are not in college.”
[–]blueoak93 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I still hate the fact that all these articles have to start with insisting that there is a particular problem with rape on campuses.
It is hateful, but since it has the effect of "setting them up to knock them down", it is also a very good thing.
[–]PierceHarlan12 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is the final word on the subject.
Coming from you, that is a definitive statement. No one anywhere has campaigned and advocated harder o longer than you, so when you say this, it really means something.
[–]mushybees3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Indeed, this is the fairest, least biased and best piece of journalism I've seen on the subject so far
[–]wazzup9879 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Jesus fuck feminism is crumbling fast. from slate no less. common sense to save the day!
[–]Cant_Ban_All_MRAs6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That was my first thought when I saw the link - Slate published this?
[–]dungone6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This is what a feminist trying to save face sounds like:
Carol Tavris is a social psychologist and author of the feminist classic, The Mismeasure of Woman, and, with Elliot Aronson, Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me). She says she is troubled by the blurring of distinctions between rape (notably by predatory males), unwanted sex (where one party agrees to sex not out of desire but to please or placate the partner), and the kind of consensual sex where both parties are so drunk they can barely remember what happened—and one of them later regrets it. She says, “Calling all of these kinds of sexual encounters ‘rape’ or ‘sexual assault’ doesn’t teach young women how to learn what they want sexually, let alone how to communicate what they want, or don’t want. It doesn’t teach them to take responsibility for their decisions, for their reluctance to speak up. Sexual communication is really hard—you don’t learn how to do it in a few weekends.” Tavris also believes holding only men responsible for their sexual behavior has pernicious effects on women because it supports a victim identity that is already too prevalent in our society. “It’s so much easier to be a victim than to admit culpability, admit your own involvement, admit that you made a mistake,” she says. “It’s much easier to say it’s all his fault. Look, sometimes it is all his fault. That’s called rape. But ambiguities and unexpected decisions are part of many encounters, especially sexual ones.”
Carol Tavris is a social psychologist and author of the feminist classic, The Mismeasure of Woman, and, with Elliot Aronson, Mistakes Were Made (but Not by Me). She says she is troubled by the blurring of distinctions between rape (notably by predatory males), unwanted sex (where one party agrees to sex not out of desire but to please or placate the partner), and the kind of consensual sex where both parties are so drunk they can barely remember what happened—and one of them later regrets it. She says, “Calling all of these kinds of sexual encounters ‘rape’ or ‘sexual assault’ doesn’t teach young women how to learn what they want sexually, let alone how to communicate what they want, or don’t want. It doesn’t teach them to take responsibility for their decisions, for their reluctance to speak up. Sexual communication is really hard—you don’t learn how to do it in a few weekends.”
Tavris also believes holding only men responsible for their sexual behavior has pernicious effects on women because it supports a victim identity that is already too prevalent in our society. “It’s so much easier to be a victim than to admit culpability, admit your own involvement, admit that you made a mistake,” she says. “It’s much easier to say it’s all his fault. Look, sometimes it is all his fault. That’s called rape. But ambiguities and unexpected decisions are part of many encounters, especially sexual ones.”
Notice a few things happening in this article. Nowhere in this article does it mention "rape culture" and the unending feminist activism that has created this mess. Instead it vaguely talks about school administrators and government officials, as if these decisions are being made in a vacuum by incompetent bureaucrats. The only opinion attributed to a feminist in the entire article is the one I quoted above. In fact it's the only mention of the word "feminist" in the entire article. Yet it is so contrarian to what the overwhelming majority of feminists think that if they didn't have so much egg on their face right now, they'd probably label her a heretic.
So what we've got in this article is the narrative that women are the victims of being told they're always the victim. Or, in other words, ever more finger pointing.
[–]dejour5 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree with you, but sometimes insisting someone accept blame makes it less likely that they will change their minds publicly.
People are more likely to change their ways if they can just say "Mistakes were made that harmed others, and we need to set that right," rather than "I made some big mistakes that harmed others because I'm selfish, short-sighted and probably a bit evil. I need to do my part to make it right."
It's much less satisfying to hear the first non-apology, but ultimately the more important thing is that the harmful actions stop.
[–]dungone2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I think the best way to stop the harmful actions is to remove these people from positions of authority. My point isn't to demand a better apology so much as to show that these people can't be trusted.
[–]LibertyIndiana6 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This should be the most upvoted thread in this entire subreddit. Forget Facebook screenshots, stories from random blogs and articles with no citations. I actually submitted this link thinking somehow this subreddit missed it.
This piece drives home that it really isn't just colleges and universities that are at fault. Men are the default criminals for rape and other crimes, often without any convincing evidence. That needs to stop
[–]dejour2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree. This posting didn't really take off, but someone else made another link and that's now on the first page.
http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/2onwxy/the_college_rape_overcorrection/
I probably should have jazzed up the title. (eg. Slate XX admits that the MRM is right about (almost) everything!)
[–]Cassius6662 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Very important article. Feminists lie about many things, among which rape and if confronted with counterpoints they try to litigate by pussing for the termination of whomever uttered the counterpoint in order to achieve that the drivel they spew goes ahead unchallenged instead of meeting the challenges to it.
[–]sackupbro2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Women use sex to control and neutralize male power ... it's nothing new. Just read about the greek hero Odysseus, in The Odyssey, written thousands of years ago. After the fall of his kingdom, Odysseus is imprisoned by the beautiful nymph Calypso who enchants him with sex and song. Finally free and on his journey, Odysseus and his men are warned of the lovely Sirens they will encounter along the way. To resist the seductive song of the Sirens he plugs the ears of his men and has himself tied to the mast of his ship. Odysseus learned what can come of a man from the lure of a woman’s song. This is an issue totally within our control if we do what the feminists did ... take back our sex.
[–]ang3c02 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Fantastic read, I'm not sure why this doesn't have more upvotes.
[–]thereturnofdoombot1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This article also suggests that "affirmative consent" rules be removed in order to protect men from false accusations. Interesting given the arguments on this sub for affirmative consent in the Shia Labeouf threads in order to protect him.
As an MRA, I just want consistency.
We should treat Labeouf's situation the same way as if a hypothetical actress was raped in the same manner. So if affirmative consent is the standard for men acting upon women, it should be the standard for women acting upon men too.
I guess if I was crafting a standard it would be based on "reasonable person" principles. Affirmative consent should be required if a "reasonable person" wouldn't think they had an invitation. Saying "no" should be required if a reasonable person would think they had an invitation.
So just walking up to a random woman and groping her breast would be wrong because a reasonable person wouldn't consider her to be consenting. It's assault even if she didn't say no. On the other hand, if you wake up next to a girlfriend after a night of consensual sex, you could grope her breast. She could say "no" and withdraw consent - but if she just laid there with a neutral-to-positive expression and didn't say anything, it wouldn't be assault. (And there are ways she could withdraw consent non-verbally too)
[–]phySi01 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
TwoX submission has a lot of discussion.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]dejour15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]smokeybehr7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]fishingbatter10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dejour7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]1TrueScotsman12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xNOM9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak93 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]PierceHarlan12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak93 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]mushybees3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]wazzup9879 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cant_Ban_All_MRAs6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dungone6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dejour5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dungone2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LibertyIndiana6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dejour2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Cassius6662 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sackupbro2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ang3c02 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]thereturnofdoombot1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]dejour2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]phySi01 point [recovered] | Copy Link