I had an unfortunate run in with a video "disproving" typhonblue's infographic tonight.

I've already highlighted the important parts, but this gives you an honest perspective into the pigheadedness of militant male feminists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=phM3XLHp0CY

That was painful. What an arrogant, intellectually devoid egghead this guy is. I had to get that out there, because this guy will attack the listener with ad-hominem endlessly throughout his entire spectacle. Unlike him, we will dissect their ridiculous assertions because they’re actually ridiculous. None of that “blocking people because I can’t comprehend their arguments” nonsense.

0:53 note how he mentions blocking instead of finishing the conversation he mentions

2:33 complains about dictionary definitions despite 99.9999999% (I CANNOT MAKE THIS HYPERBOLE ANYMORE OBVIOUS) of feminists saying "BUT THE DICTIONARY SAYS FEMINISM IS EQUALITY"

3:51 "ideological reason" coming from the cult of feminism

3:59 reads definition of rape as provided from the CDC study

4:25 note comment about alcohol being defined in this study. Note a lack of them being past the legal B.A.C. limit for obtaining the decision that they were unable to consent

4:44 reads aloud how the only way rape is rape is if someone is penetrated

5:15 LOL unironically agrees with the point that it's acceptable to define rape as penetrative only when the paper is used in academia to convince gender (women's) studies majors that men are significantly more likely and inclined to force sex on women

5:44 definition of "made to penetrate"

6:40 mentions how it is classified as "other forms of sexual violence"

7:56 peer into the mentality of male apology. Instinctively has to mention that sexual violence being mentioned can happen to women, catches self, casually mentions i guess it can happen to men too. It can even happen man on dogs! Attempts to convey the psychology that it happening to men is as rare as it happening to dogs

8:35 "tough titty" that men are being portrayed as cartoonishly evil predators in academia, and he doesn't care that your ideology classifies men and women being forced into intercourse as something that should be evaluated with the same severity

8:55 WTF? He agreed with the infographics statement that rape is defined as penetration earlier when reading the definitions, and then claims that now it's not true that women can only commit rape as defined in this survey by penetrating someone. Incoherent rambling identified.

9:15 notice the incredulity of comparing rape to made to penetration

10:05 claims methods explain why they made this difference, refuses to cite them instead saying "cite them yourself"

10:16 claims the numbers were statistically insignificant as the only reason why the CDC refused to use these numbers on methods he didn't cite. It's hard to accept validity from unsubstantiated claims.

11:04 projects about feminism and conspiracy

11:27 THE ONLY REASON SOMEONE WOULD CALL SOMEONE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST IS BECAUSE THE PERSON CALLING THEM A CONSPIRACY THEORIST IS WRONG

hahahahah

he's literally just insinuated all conspiracies must be right

12:13 Comparing a woman forcing a man into sex is not comparable to a man forcing a woman into sex when creating statistic to learn about a culture that forces sex because they are defined differently you see

Something about dictionaries applies right now

12:34 note that he claims the numbers of forced intercourse within the last 12 months between both sexes is comparable, and that is why it should be disregarded when considering the actual amount of people forced into sexual intercourse

13:10 starts to stress the importance of lifetime numbers as if they're significantly more relevant towards figuring out the amount of forced intercourse happening within society today

13:50 reads refutation

15:25 Reads the study Widom and Morris study showing willingness of victims of documented sexual abuse disparity between men and women at 16% and 64% respectively. The study says "These gender differences may reflect inadequate measurement techniques or an unwillingness on the part of men to disclose this information" and he chooses to claim it "scientific" to consider only one or the other instead of considering a combination of both.

This is important. This is the beginning of the climax. He's about to make his big point 16 minutes in.

He's claiming because of the word "or" in this context it can literally only mean one or the other. Rather than consider a combination of the possible reasons, he claims it scientific to say "because of chance that it is not valid for reasons unbeknownst to researchers, it is safe to assume the research completely invalid no matter what because that's more convenient for my ideologue"

Something about logic and the space time continuum

16:36 reads refutation

16:46 claims again that those figures he alluded to without citation are removed only for his inferred reasons

16:58 claims the evidence presented is being too selective

17:03 rather than showing why or how, changes to selective charts that show the already established male on female sexual violence ratio being higher without acknowledging that forced intercourse is still occurring at nearly the same rate and that's the whole damn problem

17:14 Sex of Perpetrator in lifetime reports of sexual violence graphs being talked about. Mentions how in all forms males were the majority perpetrator against women. Note that this claim is true in 1,670,000 men made to penetrate vs 1,700,000 women raped, and recall something about statistical insignificance

Also emphasizing the importance that 98.4% of women who were victims of rape as defined in this study were victims to men. For male victims, he emphasizes that 93.3% of all male victims of rape are also victims of other males. Other forms, including being made to penetrate, are an overwhelming majority of female perpetrators of violence.

17:58 mentions the ~80% victims of being made to penetrate are from a female abuser

18:36 begins obvious comparison disparity between lifetime statistics without accounting for the Widom and Morris study into the subject under the false logical assumption of "because it could be invalid, it is"

18:59 "if 79.2% of the made to penetrate column is female that comes out to 4,317,192 members forced by females lifetime." Note how he does not consider that female on female abuse of being made to penetrate as he's deemed it "statistically insignificant" is actually "statistically impossible" because a woman cannot readily force envelopment onto something that cannot be enveloped.

19:53 "Female rape victims at 91.1% out of the 25 million lifetime, 21,432,000 were raped by men. Additionally, 1,116,184 men were raped by males." He does not forget the additional male perpetuated violence violence.

20:28 "the male offenders which come out to 22,984,200 and add in 4 million (4,317,192) women raped by women you get a percentage of 15.81% of the total offenders as described in the CDC study were female"

21:52 reads infographic

22:10 refers to the lifetime graphs after failing to explain why Widom and Morris's findings must be completely ignored when mentioning lifetime and 12 month graphs, assumes the infographic is referring to the CDC's gendered definition of rape instead of the actual issue of rape being forced sexual intercourse (and ironically highlighting precisely why this confusion concerns the MRM) and uses the incorrect numbers to draw his conclusions despite the incorrect premise.

22:45 re-emphasizes 1,116,184 men are raped by males which totals into the 21 million rapes against women. blahblahblah back to 15.81% sorry this voice ugh.

15.81% is not 40% when i conveniently forget to use prominent scientific data that differs from my own because it's "just a theory." /s

22:59 the way he says rapes sounds rapey! Prove that it doesn't. omg misognynynyn

23:30 "In conclusion this is bullshit. Rape is defined as penetration only within the survey and should be the only definition used in an academia that fails to acknowledge the difference in definition when accounting for the same exact word defining the entire culture we live in. This makes sense to me because, you see.

24:10 "Because women suffer more other areas pertaining to sexual abuse, they must be the primary victims of forced intercourse as correlation is causation. Furthermore, even though only 16% (out of 100% in case you're like this guy) of men with confirmed cases of sexual abuse reported their abuse in accredited study compared to 64% (out of 100%, again) of women who would be willing to do so under the exact same circumstance, I can only assume the methods to gather information were flawed then, and have improved to 100% accuracy when gathering (or even documenting) issues now because that was the 90s and people still listened to smash mouth."

Paraphrasing icyww but basically this

24:20 "All the other numbers go up across the board in terms of other definitions of sexual violence so they'll obviously rise in equal percentages despite the fact that the last 12 months show nearly identical amounts of forced intercourse.

The lifetime numbers, if accounting for the Widom and Morris study, would be significantly different for men and women. Men would gain significantly more cases than stated of forced intercourse within our society. Of course I should not consider the societal dictation when asking for men to report on this subject, because women have it harder and patriarchy."

25:28 for some reason he thinks that because men and women commit sexual violence in different numbers in other areas, the statistical relativity in similar actions (i.e. being forced into sexual intercourse) does not matter.

25:41 skips an entire segment of the infographic as irrelevant while saying "sure it has a couple good points I guess but it's just an appeal to emotion so i'm not going to read it, back to the numbers of which I have already illustrated sophisticated incompetence."

This guy has a way of failing to provide unbiased information that's nearly an artform, wow

26:00 celebrates with righteous fury that the biased definitions and understandings as explained and provided from within the CDC cannot lead to a 40% female rapist outcome, because rape cannot happen without penetration

26:10 "as imperfect as this exercise has been" understatement of the year

26:13 "if we account for the numbers without the Widom and Morris understanding of the numbers, they show what you said they'd show without the Widom and Morris understanding of the numbers"

26:20 "made to penetrate and rape are different because they are defined differently in the study. I'm sure by omitting this detail and ignoring that they happen at nearly the same frequency in accordance with much more relevant and accurate 12 month figures. Instead, by drowning it out in 'other sexual violence' that happens unevenly to the genders, academia will not present a skewed version of the situation pertaining to forced intercourse."

26:36 “listen to me project about ideology.”

26:56 EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. Listen to the way he defines each instance of rape as an individual psychopath. This is a fine example in highlighting feminist indoctrination and involvement with marginalizing mens rights.

27:35 another reference to his demonstrably ignorant 15.81%.

27:49 "in conclusion be very careful in reading studies unless I tell you about them, because I am credible and I said so. We all know women aren't as bad as men in any ways because women are chaste, pure goddesses nearly incapable of wrongdoing. Men are just crazy violent psychopaths, because my flawed and biased numbers confirm my flawed and biased thought.

This guy just makes assertions based on his own ideology and complains about ideologue for 30 minutes. What a waste of time, and what an insult to skeptics everywhere.