I saw an utterly ridiculous and infuriating comment where someone was criticizing the "women and children" rhetoric claiming it de-values and de-humanizes men (which is absolutely true), you had the usual misandrist garbage from misandrists chiming in saying how the phrase is mostly used in war-time. Claiming women and children are often targeted and used as human shields, blah blah blah (to say nothing of the fact many male soldiers are also killed or captured and either also used as shields or kept as POWs). This idiot then proceeds to say how women and children are trafficked by men, and of course ignoring the fact many men are also trafficked and there's women who traffickers. Unbelievable, misandrists always find a way to make everything a "women most affected" issue when both genders suffer and men also suffer as well. In warfare everybody is targeted, both combatants and civilians, and there's no doubt far more non-combatant men than ones who are soldiers. But of course misandrists only ever want to go on about the "women and children" and even only "women and girls," as UN Women did with their recent doozy of a post about how the war in Ukraine got "deadlier for women and girls." So it's a cakewalk for men and boys, now? Ugh.

I know I shouldn't let an internet idiot upset me like this, but damn. To think people this ignorant and hateful exist, and will still deny misandry being a real and serious problem.