The Circumcision article brought back "with some men expressing feelings of violation about being involuntarily circumcised" and "Some men have expressed strong feelings of sexual humiliation, mutilation, violation, or resentment being involuntarily circumcised for non-medical reasons without their consent."

If someone visited the article half a year ago, neither of these statements were on there (for who knows what reason), and there was no talk of men feeling angered or violated about it. Like, WHY in the name of fuck were these even removed in the first place?! It felt so 1984-ish.

There's even a foreskin restoration subsection on it now too! Progress! I hope this makes some people's day because the Wikipedia article was so totally biased half a year ago, and we need better Wikipedia standards.