This isn’t novel. Throughout our species’ history, women have paired with older men (greater than 5-10 years). It’s only in the modern era where same-aged pairing is expected. This is largely because women are hypergamous, and cultures have reinforced that.

Given this, today, either you pair with a woman with equal or more intimate experience than you, which is to be expected due to age, or pair with a woman with less experience and deal with the taboo.

I think expecting a virgin is unreasonable. My ideal body count is one body a year after the age of 18. If she’s 30, that means 12 different men. Unfortunately, I don’t believe most women can meet this criterion, even some of the best, even feminine and submissive women by Western standards. The deal breaker is not about the number of sexual partners; it’s about the indication this person has a low capacity to gain and maintain long-term relationships/prefers short-term relationships.

Therefore, you have two options: 1. Cycle through women; good, reasonable women by Western standards 2. Wait for or go find a woman; young, attractive, impressionable women, with less experience than you.

This is a catch-22. There are women in the former category who would make excellent partners even after playing the field. And there are women in the latter category who will be absolute menaces because they want to play the field.

What do you think?

When I get back to it, I’ll express why I think the modern dating phenomenon is a national security risk. Sneak peek - if men aren’t made to secure their fair share of resources and women in a society, why would they continue to be subservient to said society, let alone first and die to preserve it?