Suicide is a feature of the social schema, and not a bug.

Women are biologically built for one main purpose: to make children.

A woman who does not produce a child is worse than a beta Incel.

Studies show, by generation, that close to 90% of women end up reproducing, whilst only 20% of men are biologically fathers.

A beta Incel at least has some excuse for his failure to become a father: it's a fierce competition at the top and the odds are stacked heavily against him just to have a 1 in 5 shot at reproduction. It's mathematically impossible for every man to be in the top twenty percentile.

Imagine, what an utter failure a woman must be to become an unmarried, post-wall cat lady with no children. They are a complete waste of resources in a game with the odds heavily stacked in their favor. They have a 9 in 10 shot of fulfilling their imperative by default, through simply having another X chromosome over a Y, right out of the gate.

They have zero excuses for being childless. They literally have dick thrown at them their entire lives. Their SMV is less than that of a black single mother, with several kids that have different fathers: at least her children will have a chance to get it right the next generational go-around. The cat lady has zero chance.

It's game over. It's genetic death.

The science is in: women who have children, and continue to have children, are significantly less likely to suffer from depression than women who don't.

Women having children staves off symptoms of depression.

Symptoms of depression lead to thoughts of suicide.

Go figure, an organism that fulfilled its biological imperative is less depressed than one that didn't.

An organism that didn't fulfill it's imperative is literally a waste of resources for the tribe. The urge to off yourself is a directive from the social organism that you unconsciously participate in- it's attempting to cast off the dead weight.

Basically, if you don't contribute value, you're a waste of space and your urge to kill yourself is simply a feature of the system to insure that the incels do not continue to be a drain on the system.

System is working as intended.

What percentage of people become parents?

TL;DR - 89.615

I'm not going to differentiate between biological and adopted children while talking of parenthood.

Not a lot of research has been done on the subject (especially in terms of number of countries) and the percentage of childless parents vary a lot in different countries given the different social, cultural and religious norms in them. It is also difficult to give an exact figure since the couple could, in theory, adopt - or in rare cases, conceive - a child any time before they die.

As a result most data considers women who have not had a child until their mid-forties.

Here, I will try to calculate a 'global' answer to your question.

According to OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development), an average of 30% women remained childless in the age group of 25-49 in European OECD countries (21 out of 28 EU countries).In the US, about 17% of women remain childless at approximately age 40.The World Fertility Report, 2009 suggests that about 4% of women in India are childless.In China, about 25.7% of the women are estimated to remain childless till the age of 50.In Australia, this is about 20%.

In general, educated women have a higher probability of being voluntarily childless, and hence the rate is higher in developed countries (except China).

However, this list comprises mostly of developed countries. Keep in mind that most of Africa and South America is still in the underdeveloped/developing phase as well as a big part of Asia. Also keeping in mind their greater population, social and cultural norms and the stigma attached to being childless in many of these regions, let us assume that together they have a childless couple rate of about 5% (which is basically saying that most of this would be due to infertility and mental/physical problems rather than voluntary childlessness/celibacy).

Calculation

The European OECD counties have a total population of 465.6 million (I was a little dirty while calculating that, so please correct me if I'm wrong), the US stands at about 319 million, India at 1.25 billion and China at 1.36 billion while the population of Australia is about 23 million. That's about 3.417 billion people. This is Category I.

With a world population of about 7 billion, that leaves us around 3.583 billion people of which 5% are childless women (according to our assumption). This is Category II.

Now, I'm going to assume that there are an equal number of men and women in all these places in the world. It is also worth mentioning here that the entire population is not just made up of people in the reproductive age. So let's assume an average of 45% people everywhere in the reproductive age.

Hence, about 246.6 million people (men and women) are childless in Category I out of about 1.537 billion people in the reproductive age. The number is 80.6 million for Category II for about 1.612 billion people.

So, out of 3.149 billion people who could become parents, around 2.822 billion became parents. So, to answer your question, about 89.615% people become parents.

Childless men more depressed than childless women, study finds

Even though there’s often more social pressure on women to have kids, men may actually feel more depressed and lonely over not having children, according to the results of a small British survey.

The findings were presented at the annual meeting of the British Sociological Association in London Wednesday (April 3) by Robin Hadley, of the United Kingdom’s Keele University, who polled 27 men and 81 women who didn’t have kids.

About the same proportions of men and women said they wanted kids (59 percent of men and 63 percent of women). Among that group, half of the men said they experienced isolation because they weren’t parents, while just over a quarter of women said the same.

Compared with women, these men also were more likely to feel jealous of other parents and sad, angry, and depressed.

“There is very little research on the desire for fatherhood among men,” Hadley said in a statement. “This challenges the common idea that women are much more likely to want to have children than men, and that they consistently experience a range of negative emotions more deeply than men if they don’t have children.”

There was one area where women beat the men: guilt. None of the men who wanted kidsfelt guilty about not having them, compared with 16 percent of women.

The survey was conducted with an online questionnaire among adults ages 20 to 66, with an average age of 41. Most were white, heterosexual and had full-time jobs.

In another poll of 125 people who were already parents, Hadley found that women who wanted more children had higher levels of anger, depression, guilt, isolation, sadness and yearning than men when they thought about not being able to have more kids.

Whereas the focus of this study was childless adults who wanted kids, it’s important to note that not all people without children are the same. There are those who choose to be childfree and those facing infertility, job demands or financial concerns.

An American study published last year found that women who choose to be childfree felt more pressure to reproduce than other women without children, but they weren’t so distressed about their life without kids. Meanwhile, women who wanted children but did not have them because of fertility or medical issues were the most distressed, according to those results, published in The Journal of Marriage and Family.

Preventing suicide in women

Pregnancy usually protects against suicide. Suicide rates in pregnancy are estimated to be up to half those of women who are not pregnant...

...Motherhood, especially when children are very young and most dependent, also protects against suicide. Qin et al...

...found that having a child <2-year-old significantly decreased suicide risk for women.

1 man for every 17 women were paternal fathers through history

Once upon a time, 4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, something very strange happened to human reproduction. Across the globe, for every 17 women who were reproducing, passing on genes that are still around today—only one man did the same.

"It wasn't like there was a mass death of males. They were there, so what were they doing?" asks Melissa Wilson Sayres, a computational biologist at Arizona State University, and a member of a group of scientists who uncovered this moment in prehistory by analyzing modern genes.

Another member of the research team, a biological anthropologist, hypothesizes that somehow, only a few men accumulated lots of wealth and power, leaving nothing for others. These men could then pass their wealth on to their sons, perpetuating this pattern of elitist reproductive success. Then, as more thousands of years passed, the numbers of men reproducing, compared to women, rose again. "Maybe more and more people started being successful," Wilson Sayres says. In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man.