Why Sjws and Feminists Are so Hell-Bent on Making Every Woman Ugly

TheRedPike · 2018-03-04T15:55:54+00:00

We aren't here to bash women or debate feminists. We all agree that the latter are a cancer and the former nifty. Rule ZERO: We are here to discuss sexual strategy for MEN in the current world as it really is.

cappadocianhawk · 2018-03-04T12:39:30+00:00

They are not trying to make women ugly, they misguidedly think being attractive for males should not be a priority for women. Of course this would be a stupid breeding strategy, but men in their infinite horniness has allowed females to get away with not being attractive for far too long.

If you're not at the top 20% a girl can access, you are nothing. Maybe orbiter material at best. On the other hand, a man will fuck just about anything. This pedestalizing has caused some of them to think they are hot shit, and consequently fueled their " women are superior to men " logic.

I, however, am not worried. Solipsism has no power over reality, and this mass hysteria shall pass over time.

Kinbaku_enthusiast · 2018-03-04T13:58:27+00:00

Women are rarely lesbians. Female sexuality is much more malleable than male sexuality. Every lesbian (except those older than me) I've slept with. One rationalised it with "Oh, it seems I'm bisexual after all". Another called herself both lesbian and heterosexual. It doesn't matter. Women typically don't think logically, so they're not expressing discrete logic when they refer to themselves as lesbian. They're expressing how they feel right now.

I think this comic encapsulates it fairly well: Self-described lesbian ends up shacking up with a guy

Feminism in every regard is anti-fertility. So of course it's against attractive women. It's against marriage. It's pro-abortion. It's for education for women into their late twenties. It's for career women. The only way that it isn't anti-fertility, is that it is pro-single mother (the most unhealthy home environment for children). Having women in careers does it as a double whammy, as it both stops women from getting a guy during their most fertile and attractive years, it also skyrockets their demands as they're still looking to date up (and all the more succesful guys are taking their pick of 20 year olds). It's pro-female promiscuity, which reduces their attractiveness as mothers for men who choose who to spawn with. It's for female domination in marriage in various ways, which reduces men willingness to marry (which used to be a resources/security for fertility trade)

If you were to design a movement to reduce fertility, you couldn't design a better movement than feminism.

And of course passive people prefer to drag other people down with them than look at their own choices and change themselves. That path is hard.

But it's the only path worth walking.

imjgaltstill · 2018-03-04T14:11:44+00:00

Rush Limbaugh summed it up quite succinctly 30 years ago.

Feminism was created to allow unattractive women equal access to the mainstream of society. - Undeniable truth of life #24

Rommel0502 · 2018-03-04T14:34:13+00:00

For the 1000th time here, the answer for almost every transactional question is always the market, the market, the market.

Poor men don't like rich men. Ugly women hate good looking women. Why? Because values in the market are always relative, and someone exhibiting value far above you shows you are that much further down in the pecking order. No one likes that, so they hate the people representing it. That simple.

Krackajak78 · 2018-03-04T09:28:11+00:00

Also keep this in mind.... Takes more then loud noises to affect change

LandoChronus · 2018-03-04T13:51:38+00:00

"This is your girl. Now this is your girl on feminism.

Feminism: not even once."

DimoneFreehold19 · 2018-03-04T14:40:30+00:00

Feminists: No ones ugly if everyone's ugly.

tibikush2012 · 2018-03-04T14:04:39+00:00

It's the same with men SJW. Most anarchists, communists, fascists and neo nazis (basically men holding extreme political ideologies) I have seen are either short or ugly men (not all but many of them). Same with women who hold those positions. It comes from a big dissatifaction with your reproductive success (or sexuality).

A few of the women in the articles were still hot even after the change (nothing wrong with short hair if you have the face for it...). Also, many of them wore make-up in the before photos and make-up can make a woman (especially the eyes) look 10 times better than without makeup

redditcdnfanguy · 2018-03-04T15:48:46+00:00

Well, two reasons.

1 - They are ugly themselves. 2 - And this is the big one - they want to punish straight males, especially White ones. They want to make make male heterosexuality illegitimate.

RedwallAllratuRatbar · 2018-03-04T11:33:58+00:00

SJW's aren't ugly. They're normal. They're how every woman would look if makeup was banned. Apart from being overweight, they look similar how women in the medieval times looked.

Pseudobellinus · 2018-03-04T14:30:51+00:00

You are clearly a feminist trying to reverse engineer an opinion to infect men by claiming 'science' is something you have gratitude for when you clearly draw the parallel between you blurting crap you feel, and a theoretical truth.

Lady Gaga. Madonna. Clown makeup.

100% feminism. Completely ugly but very attractive to MISOGYNISTS and CLOSET homosexuals.

Remember who designed the worthless clothing you think makes women so attractive.

You are probably gay.

DarkDefenderDoc · 2018-03-04T15:38:53+00:00

You know that the whole crowd in this photograph probably smells terrrrible

mancozbi · 2018-03-04T12:13:18+00:00

That girl with the human rights poster is very cute, not at all ugly.

Title	Why Sjws and Feminists Are so Hell-Bent on Making Every Woman Ugly
Author	karenwentz85
Upvotes	118
Comments	26
Date	March 4, 2018 9:23 AM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/81wqxi/why_sjws_and_feminists_are_so_hellbent_on_making/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/why-sjws-and-feminists-are-so-hell-bent-on-making.49032 https://theredarchive.com/post/49032

Comments