With escorts, the vast vast majority of them only offer protected sex. In other words, they make the man wear a condom for penetrative sex inside the vagina.

​

However, I feel like there's a bit of a contradiction here. These same escorts almost always offer deep french kissing and oral without protection (them giving you oral/you giving them oral). You can easily catch STDs with both these activities, as well as with penetrative sex. But they only request protection for one of the activities - penetrative sex.

​

My theory is this: the average man who sees escorts is probably physically repulsive to these women. And most likely they are socially awkward/very beta as well. The escorts don't want to go on the pill, because that would mess up their hormone cycle and be a general inconvenience. So they ask the men to wear condoms, but IF a suitable good looking, high status man does decide to fuck them, they will happily fuck him without a condom.

​

I've heard stories before of attractive men (bodybuilders, male models etc.) seeing escorts and the escort says she doesn't want a condom on. Because she wants the man with the good genes to cum inside her. But the man with the good genes seeing an escort is a rare occurrence - so she must state that she only offers protected sex. This fits in with her hypergamous nature.

​

I actually messaged several women who offered bareback near where I live. 6 of them to be precise. I got 4 replies - one said they love bareback, but 3 of them actually said "yes but not just with anyone/depends who it's with" or similar wording. So it seems they DO want bareback, but only with a sufficiently attractive man. They don't want to be breeding with the average fat, ugly beta male who sees them.

​

What do you reckon? Is this the reason why escorts usually only offer protected sex? Because you can catch STDs easily from kissing and oral, it makes no sense why they only offer penetrative sex as protected.