Redpill news source?

JanLul · 2015-11-27T20:24:25+00:00

The Red Pill is good for what it was intended to be. A news source chewed up to fit with your own particular perception is silly.

If you are really looking for news sources that are less about spreading ideology and their own influence, you are going to have to pay a fairly significant amount of money.

The Economist would be an example. A regular subscription would be ~200 EUR a year ~150 if you are a student.

I hear interesting things about The Financial Times. From what I gather this source is slightly more expensive. It's around ~30 to 50 EUR a month. I currently have some kind of offer from them for 247 EUR for a year, which is only redeemable in most Eurozone countries. So I guess you can shoot a message if you're interested.

Perhaps a subscription at Stratfor would interest you. It's about ~350 EUR yearly. Currently they have some kind of sale for new customers: ~130 for a year.

CardioPumps · 2015-11-27T20:20:09+00:00

I am sure you can't find a source that will satisfy you 100%.

My solution was to become my own source, by curating various sources.

Follow people/stuff you like, you find red pill on Twitter. Add various rss feeds to Feedly.

Think that way, it is way better that way.

IVIaskerade · 2015-11-28T00:37:04+00:00

Read the news (from multiple outlets comprising multiple viewpoints), think critically about it, and form your own opinions. There's your news source.

I will say that Zerohedge, the Financial Times and Reuters all tend to be mostly unbiased, though they'll rarely be the ones to break new stories. BBC news, whilst generally supportive of the current UK government, is also pretty decent for world affairs.

Sepean · 2015-11-27T20:37:42+00:00

Who cares about the news? Read real books instead.

One of the strange facts of life is that so many people spend so much time reading about what politicians do but haven't even read a little public choice theory, so they don't understand why politicians act like they do. It's like watching sports without knowing the rules.

trpftw · 2015-11-27T21:57:41+00:00

Honestly, don't watch the news. It's bad. Read history books instead.

Watch live primary sources. So only watch the news when you wanna see an interview or you want to see someone interviewed who was a witness.

Some of the most red-pill books (for news/events/history not for sexual strategy) I've read are from Henry Kissinger and evolutionary biologists like Richard Dawkins or philosopher/neuroscientists like Sam Harris. But I don't mean that as part of "sexual strategy", but more like an alpha realistic outlook into the world around you. I consider TRP realism.

SS_BenGarrison · 2015-11-27T20:48:00+00:00

Check out 8ch.net/pol/

Title	Redpill news source?
Author	wont_tell_i_refuse
Upvotes	7
Comments	11
Date	November 27, 2015 6:33 PM UTC (10 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/askTRP
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/3uhq9l/redpill_news_source/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/askTRP/redpill-news-source.157075 https://theredarchive.com/post/157075

Comments