New Discovery: Trust vs. Arousal Girls

So this is the newest big idea with game that I've had. I first realized this about a week ago and have been thinking about it a lot, and testing/playing around with it last night. The idea is that for the seduction phase with girls (kissing, making out, foreplay, sex) some girls require more (immediate) trust while some require more immediate arousal. We already know that arousal fluctuates with time, but the idea of girls trusting you more in the moment is unexplored as far as I know. More on this later.

So, some girls will make out with you, get into foreplay, or straight to sex (hasn't happened to me yet) from almost purely arousal. This is well known now, and allows for crazy shit like 5 minute bathroom pulls to go down. More commonly, getting a girl aroused to move towards sex is referred to as spiking buying temperature. But on the other side of the coin, you generally are going to need a girl to trust you and have a connection...

...Which is where trust comes in. A girl's overall trust in you is comfort, but when I say trust I refer to how much she trusts and connects with you in that moment. The way I use the term, trust is to comfort as arousal is to attraction.

As I was saying, some girls you need to lean towards arousal, and some towards trust to get that makeout, initiate foreplay, or have sex. On a scale like so,

Arousal-------------------------------------------------------Trust

most girls are leaning left (towards arousal) for makeouts, further to the right than makeouts for foreplay, and yet further to the right (probably in the right half of the spectrum) for sex. Where each girls' points are on this scale are unique, of course.

Its important to elicit where on this scale a girl lies before escalating towards sex on her, even if that means just going for a makeout. Without over-thinking it, you want to have a good idea if she's more of a typical "party girl" who will be willing to make out or bang just because she's wound up, or if you're going to need to establish more of a connection and momentary trust. Because people tend to label and shame one another, girls to the far left end of the spectrum tend to be criticized as "sluts" whether or not they actually act trashy, and girls to the far right get called "prude," although I believe that these labels are based on correlation rather than causation.

As an example, I'd say that the girl I hooked up with last night is right in the middle of the scale. Leaning left for make outs, center for foreplay, and a little right for sex. This is because I had to get her pretty aroused before getting her pants off to the point of already fingering her, while I also told her how I didn't bang my ex because I thought I'd be using her in that case to spike her trust in me. Pure arousal was not working, and the trust statement got me just far enough to arouse her further by fingering her, which got her to take her pants off. Quite the combination.

For reserved, insecure, virgin, or just heavy anti-slut-defense girls you're going to need more trust. In my experience trust's starting point is based on where your comfort is with the girl, but can be spiked similarly to arousal. It can be spiked by being in physical intimacy with the girl (cuddling or holding hands), long emotional eye contact, sharing/re-bringing up personal details, exposing other "vulnerable" (Models) aspects of your personality, and meeting/exceeding her expectations of you.

Personally I think girls leaning heavily towards trust are WAY harder and I don't think I've ever hooked up with an extremely trust-leaning girl. It's much easier to pump arousal then spike trust, and spiking trust is not a widely discussed topic in the community, although it is the key to unleashing many girls' sexuality.