TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Wikileaks of Sony emails: Bill Murray was apparently forced to promote the new Ghostbusters movie under the threat of a lawsuit

BaconCatBug

June 11, 2016
183 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/104704
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Wikileaks of Sony emails: Bill Murray was apparently forced to promote the new Ghostbusters movie under the threat of a lawsuit
Author

BaconCatBug

Upvotes 183
Comments 33
Date June 11, 2016 6:06 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4nkcr0/wikileaks_of_sony_emails_bill_murray_was/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/wikileaks-of-sony-emails-bill-murray-was.947661
https://theredarchive.com/post/947661
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by BaconCatBug

'Game Of Thrones' star Kit Harington forced to apologize for saying men can be victims of sexism

5445 upvotes
November 1, 2017
/r/MensRights

Just another feminist being a lying hypocrite. In other news, today is a day ending in y.

3620 upvotes
April 14, 2021
/r/MensRights

Magdalena Skipper (Nature EIC): what did it take for her to start caring about suicide?

2185 upvotes
May 29, 2021
/r/MensRights

Just a reminder, in Canada women can legally rape 14 year old boys if they "think" they are 16.

2153 upvotes
January 8, 2018
/r/MensRights

Suicide attempts by teen girls spiked during COVID-19 pandemic: CDC - The spike of successful suicides by teen boys unimportant

1934 upvotes
June 14, 2021
/r/MensRights

Hillary Clinton: "If we broke up the big banks tomorrow, would that end racism? Would that end sexism?"

1784 upvotes
February 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Actual Gawker quote: "If men actually count as people".

1758 upvotes
July 13, 2016
/r/MensRights

Men consistently outperform women in Oxford exams. Solution: ban exams

1700 upvotes
September 23, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]ThePigmanAgain 32 points33 points34 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So much for the excuse that the feminist remake is okay because the original stars support it..

[–]redditorriot 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

I'd imagine he was contractually obliged (not forced) to promote it.

Either way, this email is so short on detail and context.

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

How is that not force? Whether someone is threatening to kill you, punch you in the face, or sue you, they are still attempting to intimidate you into compliance with a threat of a negative consequence. If that threat is large enough that there's only one option that's reasonable viable, that's being forced.

[–]redditorriot 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

If you can show he was forced to sign the contract against his will then I'll agree with you.

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, he couldn't possibly have signed a contract to promote any Ghostbuster sequel before this piece of shit was even in consideration, and now that it is, the terms of his contract have gone firmly south and Sony is using the contract to force his compliance. Nah.

[–]unklestinky 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He has a cameo in this film. I'm sure as a condition of getting paid for the cameo he agreed to promote the film.

[–]brontide 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm thinking the same thing, his (former) contract with SONY probably prohibits him from speaking ill of the franchise and appears to require that he promote the franchise.

[–]LddStyx 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Note the missing 3 between "Ghostbusters" and "sequel" :P

[–]redditorriot -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Again, if you can show this is the case then we might have something to talk about. Otherwise, pure speculation, frankly a bit hysterical.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Unless you witnessed the signature or the contract or the communication around it, we're BOTH speculating, and neither one of us can physically prove our case. So, do stop being a 12 year old and trying to win an argument by asking for an impossibility and then sitting there with your arms crossed like a smug little boy, will you?

Hysterical ... I peg you at about 15, you've got that condescension down pat.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You're using alts, now? Come on.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

No, you were just padding up your other account to make it look like you had support. I can go months in here without running into someone smarmy like this, but then there is two of you, on the same day, in the same thread, with the same writing style? Riiiiiiight.

[–]redditorriot -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Stop projecting.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're drawing up an interesting point in comparison to consent law.

Consent is based on contract law, which says that once you sign, you're obligated. Ironically this isn't true of consent even though it has the same bases.

Anyway, contract law is allowed because it keeps people true to their word, as they have agreed to penalties for not fulfilling their end of the deal.

Is it being forced, or coerced? In the most flat sense, yes, because you're legally obligated to do something you might not want to do or you face consequences. That's what contracts for adults are.

[–]BaconCatBug[S] 11 points12 points13 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Posting because of the rabid pushing by feminists of this movie and shitting on anyone who dares disagree.

[–]brontide 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

But in this case the thread would indicate that in 2013 Murry was refusing to endorse the franchise and SONY was willing to litigate to force Murray's hand.

It throws into doubt the very vague endorsements by the original cast that showed, suddenly, post 2013.

http://www.vulture.com/2015/08/bill-murray-on-why-he-did-ghostbusters-cameo.html?mid=twitter_vulture

But hadn’t Murray maintained for a long time that he wasn’t interested in donning that proton pack again? “That’s true, I wasn’t,” Murray admitted, though the addition of actresses like Wiig and McCarthy — who he called “a great hope” — changed his mind. “I like those girls a lot,” he said. “I mean, I really do. They are tough to say no to. And Paul is a real nice fellow.”

This email put his "enthusiasm" in a whole new light.

[–]unklestinky 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am pretty sure the enthusiasm is directly tied to how many $$$$ he got for his cameo in the movie.

[–]Lurker_IV 12 points13 points14 points 10 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Contract law is not a men's rights issue.

[–]dungone 8 points9 points10 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it's not. But knowing that you're being lied to by feminist propaganda is.

[–]bettingdog000 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

marriage is contract law and is very much a men's rights issue as is torts and statutes.

[–]Lurker_IV -3 points-2 points-1 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This post has nothing to do with a marriage.

[–]bettingdog000 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

for fucks sake, it's contract law. marriage is contract law. contracts can be manipulated to suit women. prenuptial agreements and such.just go read for a while. you seem to just want to justify your comment. here is a cookie.

[–]Lurker_IV -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

So is signing a loan contract to buy a house.

[–]bettingdog000 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

wow it thinks of contracts outside of men's rights. google why contract law is important to women then do it for men. let us all know what you find special person.

[–]Lurker_IV -2 points-1 points0 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're drunk. Go home.

[–]bettingdog000 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

you're a moron read law and try to understand it.

EDIT: stormfront is where you belong!

[–]Lurker_IV 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its sad seeing /r/mensrights invaded by tumblerinas.

[+][deleted] 10 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Lurker_IV 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You have no fucking idea what concern trolling even is do you?

[–]bettingdog000 -1 points0 points1 point 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

no more than you understand contract law.

[–]SirSkeptic 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, that certainly explains a lot.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter