Biggest Failed Shit Test in History: Women's Suffrage

tl;dr; With the Hillary shit show we are seeing devolve around us--protests, slogans, incessant whining, inconsolable sobbing, the posturing CalExit--we need to acknowledge the elephant in the room. We, men, failed the biggest shit-test in history by giving women the right to vote.

 

Originally I wrote this in response to a comment, but I realized it applies to the sub as a whole and I thought I could elucidate features of this argument that may help future RedPillers unplug.

When first confronted with this argument, that women's suffrage was a failed shit-test many bloopers will go off the rails, and even hardened RedPillers will respond with incredulity.

 

"no voting rights for women" Holy shit, this is a sub for sexual strategy and deep self development, not to think of women as subhumans with as little rights as they have in fucking Islamic countries.

--WolfofAnarchy

 

First off, welcome to the show Wolf, and let me thank you for such an excellent question.

 

Letting women vote allows women's sexual strategy to monopolize the market at the expense of all men.

 

Therefore saying women should not have the right to vote is a relevant statement.

 

As men, we are responsible for building and maintaining things. Giving women--essentially children--the right to vote was the biggest failed shit test in all of history.

 

As men, it is our job to protect our progeny. That means building healthy, stable societies where men and women can flourish.

 

Instead, with women's suffrage you have allowed globalists to infiltrate, subvert, corrupt, and destroy everything good about society so that they may rule with absolute impunity and for all profit.

 

Without the female voting block the regressive left would probably only be able to capture 5-10% of the vote. Liberals absolutely require stupid, degenerate voters to acquire power. This is why they started campaigns to acquire inner city voters, illegal aliens, "rock the vote" (18 year olds aka children), and women. This is why their entire platform is based off of intolerance and hate. They absolutely require a stupid, uninformed electorate that relies on "feelings" to win.

 

Another word for feelings is emotions. Another word for emotions is instincts. Things that operate on instinct instead of rational thought are classified as animals, non-sentient beings.

 

Therefore, these creatures who vote by feelings are no better than giving animals the right to vote.

 

What a better way to secure power? So long as I evoke an emotion, my party will stay in power in perpetuity. Appeal to all the base instincts, appease immediate desires, without the temperament of suffering (painful long term gains, pain aversion) and my party will acquire all of these unthinking voters.

 

Next, we should explore the innate differences between male and female psychology. Females are more socially driven than men. They aim to placate, and build social bonds more than men. They are less likely to buck the trend or go against the group. Males are leaders, providers, protectors. Women need providing, and try to bring peace and equality. They strive to placate than create strife. Females are horrible at threat recognition. Unabated illegal alien invasion from countries with diametrically opposed cultural values... What. Could. Possibly. Go. Wrong?

 

What does this mean? This means females will necessarily seek a government that provides for them. They will seek a strong, authoritarian government to fill the power vacuum left by removing men from their lives. Women, being more weak willed than men on average, will be less likely to agree to unpopular, painful decisions such as limiting immigration (pity) or austerity measures (provisioning). Men (real men) know the necessity of pain to foster growth. Men understand that you must sacrifice the short term pleasure for the long term gain. In the average female's mind, they are hard-wired to branch swing to the next provider. However, when the state collapses, there might not be any branches left to swing to!

 

Now, removing the women's vote does not come from misogyny. How could it? It comes from a desire to have a better society for men and women. It comes from a desire to see families prioritized over mindless hedonism. It comes from a desire to revere the strengths of the sexes. It comes from the desire to protect our progeny from threats such as exploitative globalists that would do anything to acquire power--destroy families, foment hate, murder, lie, and steal. It is our job to be protectors of our women, children, tribe, nation.

 

Of course, in this current environment you would be a fool to hold those values (aka a white knight). However, that does not make it correct. The globalists have so advanced their position that hatred between men and women (feminists), hatred between races is at an all time high. The destruction of the nuclear family is nearly complete. The globalists have completely normalized this degenerate environment. This is the result of relinquishing our natural state of being.

 

Furthermore, women were never repressed/oppressed. In traditional cultures they recognized every trait of unchecked female sexual strategy that we acknowledge and discuss on this sub. They instituted practices to account for this degenerate behavior and to mitigate it. This led to a balance of male and female power, yin and yang.

 

Islam acknowledges the differences in men and women and works to check it. You don't see gaggles of burqua wearing women marching and chanting "not my president" after a democratic election. Islam promotes modesty, chastity. Turn on the TV... You will see all sorts of "Christians" twerking half nude. Clothing is the result of intellect, nudity is an animalistic way of being. Which one is more regressive?

 

Feminism, women's suffrage itself is a bastard daughter of globalism. One tool in the cultural Marxists toolbox. Go watch Century of The Self. You will find that the women's liberation movement was fomented by manipulative marketers trying to open up new consumerist markets. Edward Bernays applied Freud's psychological methods to tap in to the female mind and manipulate society at large. Aka failed-shit test.

 

Finally, this won't be an unbiased work if I don't mention the benefits of feminism. Globalists benefit immensely as mentioned. They get to double the work force while suppressing wages. Single earner families (stay at home mom) are nearly impossible now, forcing women into the work force even if they'd rather raise their own children.

 

We at RedPill get access to wave after wave of liberated young sluts. We get to get our dicks sucked by post wall desperate feminists begging to get impregnated by our seed. It ain't all bad I suppose, but then you must ask yourself what do you desire more? Healthy society or hedonistic society that profits others at the soul sucking expense of people you're supposed to care about...

 

But by all means, delve down the "repressive, misogynist" defense you have been brainwashed with.