TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InBaggingArea Archive

View 127 posts and 3,096 comments by InBaggingArea on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
409

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights14/07/15 12:58 PM
117

SatireInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/01/15 05:42 PM
95

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights12/05/15 08:22 PM
78

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights06/08/16 11:29 PM
74

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:07 AM
70

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/02/15 08:42 PM
58

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:22 AM
48

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/02/18 11:03 AM
46

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:04 AM
44

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/12/17 07:55 AM
44

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:26 PM
44

NewsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/12/14 01:18 PM
42

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:35 AM
40

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/03/18 10:41 PM
39

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:59 PM
39

Marriage/ChildrenInBaggingArea/r/MensRights25/10/17 12:38 AM
39

Legal RightsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:40 PM
37

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:22 PM
35

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/04/15 01:25 PM
32

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:08 AM
31

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:56 PM
31

Eastern CultureInBaggingArea/r/MensRights30/09/16 08:58 PM
30

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights16/02/15 05:28 PM
28

Edu./Occu.InBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:50 AM
28

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:30 AM
28

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:03 PM
25

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:39 AM
23

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:17 AM
23

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights14/04/15 11:37 AM
21

InBaggingArea/r/MGTOW21/05/18 06:25 AM
21

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:35 AM
17

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights05/04/17 08:26 AM
16

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:19 PM
16

NewsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/02/15 03:38 PM
15

InBaggingArea/r/MGTOW19/05/18 09:36 PM
15

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/11/16 06:00 AM
15

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights16/07/17 03:06 PM
14

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/03/15 01:28 PM
14

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:36 AM
13

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:44 PM
13

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:09 PM
13

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:18 AM
13

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights30/09/17 03:58 PM
13

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:29 PM
12

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights03/06/16 02:30 PM
12

DiscriminationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:16 PM
12

Fathers/CustodyInBaggingArea/r/MensRights23/06/15 11:57 PM
11

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights14/05/15 11:31 PM
11

Marriage/ChildrenInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:25 PM
11

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/01/15 10:42 AM
11

Activism/SupportInBaggingArea/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:05 PM
11

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/03/17 05:00 PM
10

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:59 PM
10

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights03/04/15 09:23 AM
10

QuestionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/02/15 02:08 PM
10

NewsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights24/03/15 09:02 PM
10

QuestionsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/05/15 06:25 AM
10

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:23 PM
9

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights13/04/15 03:39 AM
9

DiscriminationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/04/15 08:42 PM
8

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights12/07/17 09:53 PM
8

False AccusationsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/03/15 12:21 PM
8

ProgressInBaggingArea/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:20 PM
7

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:02 PM
7

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:41 AM
7

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:09 AM
7

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:46 AM
7

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:02 PM
7

Activism/SupportInBaggingArea/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:42 AM
7

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:48 AM
7

AnalysisInBaggingArea/r/MensRights12/01/15 11:32 AM
6

QuestionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/01/15 11:09 AM
6

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights15/03/18 11:37 PM
6

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights13/04/15 04:51 AM
6

Legal RightsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/08/16 06:41 PM
6

HumourInBaggingArea/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:12 AM
6

NewsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/12/14 12:15 PM
5

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights06/02/15 10:34 PM
5

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:34 PM
5

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/01/15 04:30 PM
5

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:47 AM
5

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:26 AM
5

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:28 PM
5

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:07 AM
5

OpinionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights15/04/15 08:58 PM
5

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:53 PM
5

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights19/07/15 11:59 AM
5

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights26/02/17 11:59 PM
4

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights02/09/16 11:50 AM
4

NewsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights02/04/15 10:21 AM
4

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights08/06/16 10:10 AM
3

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights21/05/18 06:30 AM
3

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights05/12/17 11:19 AM
3

QuestionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights15/04/15 11:14 PM
2

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights27/02/18 02:38 AM
2

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/01/17 03:56 PM
2

InBaggingArea/r/askTRP11/10/16 11:32 AM
2

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/02/18 07:37 PM
2

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/03/18 08:09 PM
2

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights12/10/17 04:48 PM
2

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights09/03/18 05:47 PM
1

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/02/18 11:57 AM
1

StoryInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/03/15 02:47 PM
1

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:07 PM
1

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights30/03/18 05:13 PM
1

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights06/03/18 10:09 AM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MGTOW15/05/18 07:57 AM
0

FeminismInBaggingArea/r/MensRights20/05/15 08:27 PM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights04/10/18 10:34 AM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights27/03/19 03:04 PM
0

False AccusationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:05 AM
0

Marriage/ChildrenInBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:08 PM
0

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:35 PM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights26/08/13 10:24 AM
0

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights11/05/15 08:45 AM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights29/10/12 04:29 PM
0

QuestionsInBaggingArea/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:26 AM
0

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:24 AM
0

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:08 PM
0

DiscussionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights02/11/14 09:48 PM
0

Social IssuesInBaggingArea/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:55 PM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:08 AM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights17/05/18 09:30 AM
0

DiscriminationInBaggingArea/r/MensRights07/12/14 12:26 AM
0

GeneralInBaggingArea/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:41 AM
0

QuestionInBaggingArea/r/MensRights06/12/14 06:46 PM
0

InBaggingArea/r/MensRights12/08/13 11:45 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,096 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Umm, isn't there some connection between loyalty and love? But wait, who wants love!
/r/MGTOW30/07/19 01:05 PM
1

No, not always. Just sometimes. I'm glad we're in agreement.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 06:32 PM
1

I tend to agree with your comment. I sense you suppose we are in disagreement, but it's not obvious where. Yes, the ad stereotypes men, but looking through the representation to the idea behind it, that is, that women should resist being silenced and belittled by men, my own view is that both parties have a right to speak and we should not let the idea that men silence women be used by women to silence men.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:06 PM
3

It is the same substance. But my conditional clause does not refer to the substance, but to how it is used. One might say, for example, "whiskey may or may not be ok, depending on how it is used", without falling foul of the fallacy you alude to. You have not explained how my comment is analogous to that fallacy?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 04:54 PM
-14

It depends what it's being used for. If it's being used to stop men being unfair to women, and being condescending and shutting them up, then it's ok. Women, as individuals, should be free to assert themselves as more than just passive objects of male desire. But if it's being used, as it may well be, to do precisely to men what it claims is being done to women, that is, to silence them and prevent them from speaking up in their own defence and saying to women whatever unpalatable truths they ma…
/r/MensRights12/07/19 12:58 PM
7

Best way to oppress someone is to claim victimhood. Now that, sir, is a penetrating and powerful observation expressed in nine words.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:50 PM
1

Do you hate them?
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:38 PM
2

There are no actual hate reddits. There are just reddits people hate.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:56 PM
2

Juicy! I've always found unreconstructed left anarchists to be informally hierarchical amongst themselves. Occasionally done of the more honest ones admit it. But then, some of the more honest ones are too anarchic to join an anarchist's group.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:50 PM
1

Thanks, but this entire thread has now been removed (which, I guess, answers its question), along with the other one I was posting about, so I don't see any point in posting here any more. Sorry.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 01:10 PM
1

I see. Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:56 PM
1

So simply asking why counts as ban-worthy pestering. Is that your view? Incidentally, I did not suggest doing even this. I merely asked your view. Your response is interestingly spineless.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 02:00 PM
0

...so worthy of invisible removal? Simply allowing the community to express its preferences by voting up or down will not suffice? Women go to great lengths to display their bodies. Feminism goes to great lengths to condemn men for looking at them. This seems to me, though not to you perhaps, to be very much a men's rights issue. The point is I have been forbidden from making my case here, in at least one post. You have not been forbidden from making yours. At the very least, I think people shou…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:48 PM
1

Pretty certain this is NOT what has happened as the mods here are really rather good, but still only human. No need to test the theory, simply assume it is false and operate on that basis.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:46 PM
2

Are you sure? I may be wrong, but to me, this is an admittedly extreme example of a pattern here. For example, when /r/incels was banned we weren't allowed to even discuss it here. Not everyone will remember that. If it is an autoblock due to a malicious report, fair enough. How might we test this theory: post again or ask the busy mods? PS. It was blocked after /u/BeneficialBlock , a mod, commented that it was irrelevant. Perhaps not so busy after all. Draw your own conclusions.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:28 PM
2

Except that this post was removed, which surprised me: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9laovs/women_are_prepared_to_take_a_13000_chance_of It seems to me to be an instance of behavior by women that is a problem for the feminist idea that men and men alone objectify women, rejecting completely any part that women might play in making themselves into objects. Since this theory very much acts to hurt men, by creating an entire culture of vilification around male desire, it rather seems…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:53 PM
2

Is it worth reposting?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 12:21 PM
1

How? I can't seem to edit it. Sorry.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:55 AM
2

Is it hard to have a reasonable debate about it here as well?
/r/MensRights04/10/18 11:46 AM
1

Say more.
/r/MGTOW16/09/18 04:15 PM
1

I'm getting a distinct plural unison feel about it, all the same. You need to watch that.
/r/MGTOW13/09/18 09:58 AM
1

I'm getting a distinct plural unison feel about it, all the same.
/r/MGTOW13/09/18 09:57 AM
0

"We"? You mean, "the movement"?
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 08:10 AM
8

Is there a particular historical or cultural reason the festival has to be man free? I can't help feeling there's an elephant in the room. Maybe I'm wrong.
/r/MGTOW01/09/18 09:13 PM
1

It's a two way street. The author has not considered the possibility that a male 'displays' so well that multiple females 'choose' him. No. This is precisely the analysis be offers.
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 02:24 PM
1

Is that true?
/r/MensRights21/05/18 01:18 AM
0

I'm always happy to entertain.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:28 AM
0

Something novel for you: https://www.counter-currents.com/product/sexual-utopia-in-power/
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:25 AM
1

There Are Two Classes of People in the World; Those Who Divide People into Two Classes and Those Who Do Not
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:06 AM
3

I reject this nasty, perfidious way of thinking.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 08:54 AM
2

If he wasn't paying, she wouldn't consent, but if that's not clear, forget it. It's just a metaphor. Not important.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:36 AM
2

Yes, because he actually wants to be loved, a privilege men aren't allowed, seemingly.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:35 AM
5

Indeed. It's absolutely nothing to do with prostitution because these people just want to love and be loved like anybody else. If they have to pay for it, that just shows how unloved they are. Social anxiety is undoubtedly part of the problem as well. Perhaps other properties of the individual will be a factor too, such as being disfavored by fortune in the department of good looks, for example. Think of the elephant man. Social factors, however, are likely to play a major hidden role, and these…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:32 AM
3

Sorry. Well spotted. I meant the other way round.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 07:10 AM
-1

Some might see hooker sex as paying a woman to let her rape you. They might actually want to be appreciated for what they are, foolish though that is.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 01:22 AM
1

I'm lost.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 09:37 PM
1

And when you get mugged?
/r/MensRights19/05/18 04:44 PM
1

Just because I'm mistaken doesn't mean there's no such thing as the truth.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 11:21 AM
-9

Ok. Do your worst. I'll put my head right here while you prepare your backswing.
/r/MGTOW16/05/18 01:36 PM
-23

This does not instill confidence in the transparency of the process.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 09:51 PM
-47

And why does the central committee despatch a phalanx of club-wielding bats from hell to silence me every time I dare to ask?
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 07:15 PM
-6

By way of contrast, does society unite in facilitating the report of violent Street robbery and telling alleged victims to come forward and not feel ashamed? When such crimes are reported, are the accusers described as brave? What am I missing here. I'm sure I'm just the stupid one who doesn't understand, but then, you know, why not just explain it? Is there an official line on this?
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 07:10 PM
0

8 + 5 = 13 Paris is in France The atomic mass of Mercury is 200.59 u. Georg Washington was the first president of the United States. Action and reaction are equal and opposite. Falstaff was portly. Cervantes wrote Don Quixote Which one is subjective?
/r/MensRights15/05/18 09:26 AM
-2

Do they?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:26 PM
-2

So perhaps you felt humiliated. Humiliation and shame are not quite the same.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 08:25 PM
-1

So I guess I'll just never know.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:44 PM
0

By way of contrast, does society unite in facilitating the report of violent Street robbery and telling alleged victims to come forward and not feel ashamed? When such crimes are reported, are the accusers described as brave? What am I missing here. I'm sure I'm just the stupid one who doesn't understand, but then, you know, why not just explain it? Is there an official line on this?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 02:42 PM
-1

And why does the central committee despatch a phalanx of club welding bats from hell to silence me every time I dare to ask?
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:50 AM
1

Feel free to answer a completely different question like, 'why do rape victims feel reluctant to press charges', or 'why do rape accusers find the trial of the accused to be traumatic', or 'how many sides on a pentagon'.
/r/MensRights14/05/18 10:50 AM
5

In shock new development, person spells 'toeing' correctly in line context. Over now to our chief political editor, David Primavera. "David, what does this mean for the future of lexicality here and overseas?"
/r/MensRights10/05/18 04:44 AM
10

'"inappropriate"' lol
/r/MGTOW22/04/18 08:18 PM
112

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/16/controlling-girlfriend-first-woman-convicted-new-domestic-abuse/ "She became violent towards the man, who suffered from hydrocephalus which is caused by a buildup of fluid inside the skull which made him vulnerable, using blunt objects to strike him, wounded him with a knife and didn't help him get to hospital for treatment."
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 04:11 PM
1

I'm sorry. You banned him because you disagree with his content? I find that gut disturbing. It does, however, explain and indeed justify the suspicion I have long had about this sub. It has been tamed and smoothed by the feminist principle. And now we see its character change and come within the constraint of acceptable opinion. Submissions that strike at the heart of feminist hypocrisy are being quietly removed along with anything construed as too far along the political dimension towards the …
/r/MensRights15/04/18 08:37 AM
3

What was it, in particular, about their comment history that got them banned?
/r/MensRights14/04/18 08:57 PM
1

Thanks for the information.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 12:05 PM
1

And it's been appealed by the prosecutor and is going up to a higher court? Is this generally regarded as an instance of shariah considerations intervening in the Swedish legal justice system?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 10:15 AM
1

And what was the criticism and where did it come from? Inside or outside the judiciary and of inside, at what level?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:38 AM
1

Did this actually happen, and, if so, what features of the Swedish justice system allowed it to happen? What exactly was the verdict? How and why was it denounced?
/r/MensRights10/04/18 09:01 AM
1

About 1995
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 08:23 AM
1

Feminists³ don't have much to worry about now. Their friends will take care of everything.
/r/MensRights10/04/18 07:35 AM
1

Because male shame is female power and everybody wants power.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 08:27 AM
6

Look for the things that nobody wants to tell you.
/r/MGTOW09/04/18 02:26 AM
4

Is this true. Evidence please? I want to tell people and they won't believe me.
/r/MGTOW05/04/18 08:23 AM
15

If you call Sue at head office she should be able to issue you with a copy of our prospectus.
/r/MensRights04/04/18 07:41 PM
2

There's a lot of sexual display in the debate community. That's why women have been banned, so that their bodies won't distract the men.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:50 PM
17

Well they don't have sexual agency. That's because the patriarchy took it away from them. But how dare you suggest women don't have sexual agency. That's patriarchal.
/r/MensRights03/04/18 10:46 PM
2

Spartacus?
/r/MGTOW02/04/18 07:43 AM
3

You don't seem to understand. They are allowed to hate you. You're just not allowed to disagree hate them. I have asked central committee to arrange training for you. Check your inbox for a memo in the morning. /s°
/r/MGTOW01/04/18 07:22 PM
2

Do you mean the mensrights sub? Yeah, I've noticed it change. Can you say more about what has happened, in your view? I was going to mention it, but I wasn't sure. Previously, years back, it was under fierce attack from brigades and SRS. Now, something's different. What do you think?
/r/MGTOW01/04/18 04:46 PM
5

Close the gender pay gap. Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:22 AM
2

No. I think you've got it. There's also the different choices being made by men and women. Revealing studies of Nordic countries with fewer constraints but more gendered career choices are covered in the Peterson Newman interview and elsewhere. So basically this article is faux neutral and perpetuates the idea that the median pay gap is the oppression of women. Really that idea needs to be gracefully retired. Warren Farrell killed it years and years ago already.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 10:17 AM
2

I don't agree. In my opinion, these are not the reasons the gender pay gap is a myth.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:58 AM
6

Not really. The gender pay gap is a myth. The work and spending gaps are real. Here is a link to the guardian coverage of the gender spending gap. Basically men are working more so they can provide for women who spend more because this is what society expects of them. This kicks in after women bear children. Before that women earn slightly more. This is then reframed as men oppressing women.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 09:25 AM
28

You have to understand what this sub is. It's a feminist sub, nothing less. It is so-called because it is feminism's response to mensrights. They have tried to co-opt the mens rights issue in an embrace, extend and shut down move, that hasn't been terribly successful. You just went into the heart of feminism and told them they're all shits. Of course you got banned. You disagree with feminism, therefore you are hate, therefore you are banished. "There are only good and evil and we know which is …
/r/MGTOW01/04/18 09:03 AM
1

I did notice that. I thought it was very charming (and revealing). Thank you for highlighting.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:15 AM
1

Thanks. Good comparison. Hadn't thought of that.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:18 AM
3

It's about mensrights via feminism³ via feminist hypocrisy over refugee rape.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 12:15 AM
3

Many thanks for all your effort in putting together these links, especially the Birmingham mail ones which I read with great interest. You need to take the ".am" off that first Birmingham mail link, btw. As far as Christians being capable of doing these things, I would never have had the slightest doubt. It's really good to get your input on this and I am most grateful. I suspect we don't entirely agree, but that makes it all the more useful and important. Thanks. I hope to stop being lazy and d…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 04:56 PM
3

Thanks buddy. So just out of curiosity, anxious not to offend, do you have many examples of Sikh, Hindu or Christian South Asian gang rapists in Britain? I dimly recall middle Eastern Muslims being involved in some other cases as well. I have not checked the figures on it myself, do I don't know. There's a book called "Easy Meat" I have not yet read and a very interesting interview with the author on YouTube. He seems to have looked at the matter dispassionately and in some detail.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 03:15 PM
1

Two questions: Why are most women not feminists? After all, they are all mother bears, no? Why does the mother bear not instinctively react to protect the victim of this particular group of Muslim men in Calais. Is it incapable of discernment? And what of mother bear Shah? The victims of rape in Rotherham should shut up for the sake of diversity because the Muslim men are her cubs, even when they rape, but not the young girls victims. You find that this offers a sufficient explanation? At first …
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:40 PM
3

There's a lot in there. It's great you have first hand experience. Do you think you could just sum up your main point in just one sentence? It's sometimes hard to do, I know.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:26 PM
2

I would really love to hear your honest thoughts on this comment, for example, if you would be so kind. It took me a bit of time putting together, and the questions really interest me.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:09 PM
3

Ouch. I'm a bit inclined to do that myself. I'll have to be more careful. But what is it to spew? Is it wrong to spew? Who arbitrates? In fact, I've checked some of his claims in this video. They seem pretty accurate. But even if they are false, have they no right to state their case? Oddly, I did find your comment offensive.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:02 PM
4

Well, i really would appreciate your serious engagement then. I've looked through some of your other posts. Some of them attain a much higher standard than you are displaying here with your reflex 'holier-than-thou' shit. You do have the intelligence to address this and other points and I am sure I would not be alone in valuing your contribution.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:58 PM
3

Yes. This guy. You don't have to watch the video if you don't want to.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:47 PM
6

Hello and welcome to mensrights. What brought you here since you created your account 8 days ago?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 01:46 PM
1

Feminists have advocated with great success for the reform of our justice system in order to secure a greater number of convictions in rape cases. Are they vocal about Muslim rape gangs? If not, why not? What really drives and motivates feminism? Do they care primarily about protecting the victims of rape? In Calais, an encampment of middle Eastern refugees has built up awaiting a chance to cross the English channel. A group of NoBorders activists went there to help them. They believe in not hav…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 12:58 PM
4

Then there's this: A PROMINENT Labour MP and key ally of Jeremy Corbyn shared a social media message telling victims of sickening sex abuse to shut up for “the good of diversity.” Naz Shah retweeted and liked a post on Twitter by an account parodying left-wing writer Owen Jones which said: “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.” [..] Ms Shah, who later deleted the retweet and unliked the post, was a key figure in leading the furo…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:49 AM
22

And then there's this: Woman 'gang-raped in refugee camp ordered to stay SILENT by no-borders activists' https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/610376/woman-gang-raped-refugee-camp-activists-Italy-border-France-Ventimiglia Those no borders people are anarchists and feminists. Why do they care so much about shaming men as predators, sexists and misogynists, except in this case?
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:54 AM
16

Then there's this: Asylum seeker who paddled kayak across the Channel to Britain accused of raping Calais Jungle volunteer Woman never reported it to French police because of fears her allegation might ‘stigmatise’ refugees https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/uknews/2175018/asylum-seeker-who-paddled-kayak-across-the-channel-to-britain-accused-of-raping-calais-jungle-volunteer/
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:25 AM
3

The man wrote: “I have heard of boys, believed to be under the age of consent, having sex with volunteers. I have heard stories of men using the prostitutes in the Jungle too. “I have heard of volunteers having sex with multiple partners in one day, only to carry on in the same vein the following day. And I know also, that I’m only hearing a small part of a wider scale of abuse." The volunteer went on to say these sexual encounters were damaging for refugees, who are “in an entirely unequal posi…
/r/MensRights30/03/18 09:16 AM
1

Don't usually like her, but she's going a humdinger this time. "I don't say 'me too'; I say 'not in my name'" Chocablock with shockers
/r/MensRights28/03/18 02:31 PM
7

Does anybody here think there is an inverse correlation between male attractiveness and propensity to sexually assault?
/r/MensRights28/03/18 08:44 AM
2

Because men's rights are women's responsibilities and women's rights are men's responsibilities. What part of the zero-sum power game do you not get?
/r/MensRights27/03/18 08:25 PM
4

Intelligent comment. Brave, in a small way. +1
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:52 AM
23

There is this
/r/MensRights25/03/18 11:35 AM
11

Uh..yes. It is.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:24 PM
7

Another epitome of the dehumanisation of the relationship between men and women: https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/it0zmmr5ts8kg1rntrq1.jpg
/r/MensRights24/03/18 05:17 PM
5

Sound very binary to me. There's no such thing as biological sex, apparently. /s "I'm a historian of medicine and I can unpack that at great length for you if you want but in the interests of time I won't so that's a very popular misconception" (camp voice with mandatory high riding terminal)
/r/MensRights24/03/18 09:27 AM
4

Actually, yes. I agree with this statement. EXCEPT, I don't believe there should be a category of crime called "hate crime", but that's another matter.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 09:23 AM
3

I'm against feminism³ because I'm a feminist².
/r/MensRights24/03/18 09:11 AM
0

Yeah. Happens. Just tell them you're a girl and sometimes your kid brother uses your profile.
/r/MensRights23/03/18 07:08 PM
6

Weird thing is the Nazis almost prosecuted someone for doing this way back when. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12139150 And actually, if anyone should be offended, it should be Nazis.
/r/MensRights20/03/18 11:58 PM
1

If you could just précis that in English for us. What's the gist.. :(
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:36 PM
1

Jeez. I wish I could read German.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:32 PM
1

Perhaps I should watch this documentary.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:20 PM
1

Yeah. I see what you're saying.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:19 PM
5

Well, I'm sorry, but I looked it up and I got a bit of a surprise. It was worse than I thought. Admittedly, this is Wikipedia, but hey. During the 2015/2016 New Year's Evecelebrations, there were allegedly masssexual assaults, 24 rapes, and numerous thefts in Germany, mainly in the Cologne city center. There were similar incidents at the public celebrations in Hamburg, Dortmund, Düsseldorf, Stuttgart[27] and Bielefeld.[14][28][29]For all of Germany, police estimated in a document leaked in 2016 …
/r/MensRights15/03/18 08:07 PM
4

Ok. I'll be careful. In what way do you think I should exercise care? I'm inclined to believe that Muslims do look down on western women as prostitutes and that there has been a rise in Muslim hang tapping (Google keyboard doesn't want me to say "gang raping"). Is this wrong? There was the cologne scandal which is fairly uncontroversial now. And other German cities, I believe. I don't know. Of course, I don't want to see the rise of fascism, but I fear it would be irresponsible to support the vi…
/r/MensRights15/03/18 07:09 PM
1

Menslib is an authoritarian hate space for feminism to lure men away from men's rights.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 06:05 PM
1

Good for you. #metoo ;)
/r/MensRights15/03/18 04:27 PM
1

It's been a week since I posted the comment to which you replied. Nothing wrong with that. It's just unexpected but welcome.
/r/MensRights15/03/18 01:40 AM
1

Wow. A week ago. If you don't mind my asking, what brought you here.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:45 PM
1

Interesting. So does that mean we can't bitch and moan about the unending censoriousness of the femisphere? That would be a new development. What do the rules actually state, I wonder. No posts about bannings by moderators of other subs (too common, and not relevant to topic of "rights"). They did used to be very common, but it was quite easy to not read them, and useful for those who wanted to share. I respect rules, but don't have to think they are all good ones. I'm not a fan of this one.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:17 PM
2

Well yes. You got that one right. Wait...fagophobic? Delightful! Lol
/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:15 AM
1

Usernames? Yours, mine? Would you mind explaining, dude. Thanks. My next one will be a tea.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 11:14 AM
1

And we can also tell people to fuck off here. I like to make sure I still can just in case. So fuck off. Stop policing my thoughts. I notice you didn't actually respond, respectfully or otherwise, to anything I said in my lengthy and frank reply to your question. Seriously. FUCK OFF!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 10:08 AM
1

Did it link to another subreddit? I can't quite recall for sure, but there were links in there. Maybe do. However, when I make that mistake it usually gets removed automatically and immediately. This one, I did not notice it was removed until today. Puzzled!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 09:28 AM
1

Why do you think this whole post was removed?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:51 AM
4

Yes. That is the trekking part. Mom you just shoot him. Heart rending. And he was shot in the back. If this isn't evidence of social man-hatred, what is?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:50 AM
1

Why not? We have a sidebar. It wasn't a serious question. You don't wade into a subreddit, and yes it was dismissive, and ask it to justify its existence without even reading the sidebar. I didn't even read the link. Thank you for clarifying its nature though. I just glanced at it and thought, yep, another Feminist troll who thinks he can come into a male space and lecture from on high and divert our attention to his shit, rather than genuinely enter into the spirit of dialog. If we did that in …
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:48 AM
1

Why was this post removed? Was it removed by the mods? Did they give a reason?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:04 AM
1

Why do you think this post was removed? Was it removed by the mods?
/r/MensRights14/03/18 07:02 AM
3

Wow. You're right. Oops!
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:54 AM
12

You have to understand menslib has been cleverly named to confuse you. To make sense, simply add the prefix 'we'.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:43 AM
9

It's very hard to understand how she got off. I suspect a tearful display of feminine vulnerability may have unduly swayed the jury.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 12:07 AM
1

This sort of logical argument is a hallmark of the patriarchal misogyny that blights our inner cities. You probably should go and stand in the naughty corner. This is a safe space for dogma, bigotry, hate and vigorous exclusion of the other. You've been very naughty indeed and we are going to turn and give you 'the look'. Now then, class, where were we...
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:57 PM
1

The same way you would as a male.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:18 PM
4

FUCK off.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:15 PM
2

Nonsense. "toxic" is a propaganda term. To see this, just replace it with "naughty" in any given sentence.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 09:12 PM
10

More here: https://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-reeling-from-farrakhan-scandal-women-s-march-leader-apologizes-1.5889266 The contradiction between supporting blacks and a black leader who claims "satanic" Jews run the FBI and Hollywood and synthesize marijuana to corrupt the blank youth and supporting the Jews as victims of antisemitism is resolved, supposedly, as follows: In her statement, Morganfield clarified that “Women’s March DC unequivocally denounces racism, homophobia, sexism, trans…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 11:11 AM
1

Because after decades of feminism telling men they are horrible, serve no useful purpose and might as well be dead, which men have internalised, he comes along and restores their hope they something they do and strive to achieve could actually be good and valuable and important to others. That Sargon twat doesn't have a patch on him. And his academic training and background give him both the skill to construct a persuasive case and the knowledge of his field with which he can speak with authorit…
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:55 AM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:46 AM
1

I'm against feminism³ because I'm a feminist.
/r/MensRights13/03/18 05:31 AM
1

Oh. This thread? It was removed because of some technicality and I have to make an image and post again and I'll get round to it eventually. So that explains the silence. Would you mind passing the ketchup?
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:16 AM
1

In the what? Is this part of the manosphere? Great. Party time!
/r/MensRights13/03/18 12:14 AM
2

I have suspected for some time the mod team has been infiltrated as well. They are actually implementing what this poster is suggesting and look what it's doing to mensrights. AgainstMensRights is almost dead, they have so little to complain about, and all the pith has moved to MGTOW. What happened with incels was pretty bad. We foreswore all association with them for fear of being tainted. Posts about their sub being banned were removed on weasely grounds of irrelevance. It does not help to run…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:19 PM
1

I have suspected for some time the mod team has been infiltrated as well. They are actually implementing what this poster is suggesting and look what it's doing to mensrights. /r/AgainstMensRights is almost dead, they have so little to complain about, and all the pith has moved to MGTOW. What happened with incels was pretty bad. We foreswore all association with them for fear of being tainted. Posts about their sub being banned were removed on weasely grounds of irrelevance. It does not help to …
/r/MensRights12/03/18 11:17 PM
10

I call concern troll. No one made you come here. The logical structure of your post is to tell others what to post. I don't accept that. It seems to me that the centre of gravity of men's rights on Reddit is now moving to MGTOW precisely because they don't give a fuck what the femis think. In times gone by, this sub was like that. Why don't you just let individuals post what they want instead of a whole bunch of pussy ass censorship to please feminists?
/r/MensRights12/03/18 05:28 PM
15

Freedom is a fundamental value. Without freedom of speech we lose the collective power to pursue truth. This is so much that is wrong. Anyone who doesn't care about free speech should just shut up and listen.
/r/MensRights12/03/18 04:51 PM
1

There's also this: https://youtu.be/ICtIOLwmVI0
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:32 AM
1

I'm not familiar with it either. Who is this person? She believes her tits are what men should be looking at? Is she serious? But then she goes in to talk so much sense about responsibility. What was that she said she spent money on? Wait...do we have an honest woman here. An HONEST one? Yeah, like I occasionally meet honest women. But now we have...she appears to be well known or some kind of entertainer...and she's being honest. This is difficult. But I like her. Yeah. I am not familiar with t…
/r/MensRights12/03/18 09:17 AM
3

Behave yourself. Colonizing Mars is very naughty. What would your mother say?
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 06:05 PM
1

Well said! Ours is a deeply misandrist society in which men are remorselessly despised and wronged without compunction. When the dominant ideology is based on the idea that society hates women, and you can't question it without being shamed for hating women, you know something is wrong.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:15 PM
1

I have every confidence in you.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 09:01 PM
-1

Dude, go to/r/MGTOW. This place has been femifluenced beyond belief. Sorry about that. The last thing you need is some avuncular white knight normalsplaing how crazy you are. "Why yes, I am a little angry".
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:48 PM
0

I find all this quite disturbing. "All women hate all men" seems like a viable working thesis to me, especially when he goes on to refine it within his own post. By all means disagree, but what kind of pussy ass men's rights forum recommends its proponent for psychiatric evaluation? Did I wind up on the comments section of the Huffington post by mistake?
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:37 PM
-2

Well that's mildly inappropriate for a mensrights forum. Is venting not allowed any more? Do we have to call in professional help at the slightest sign of anger? Maybe you need some yourself.
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:19 PM
8

That was very naughty of her. He must have been toxic. /s But, you know, we all attempt a little murder from time to time. /s
/r/MensRights07/03/18 08:07 PM
1

I will explain why I posted this here. I believe the dating situation and the constrained position in which young men now find themselves in the wake of the dissolution of the institution of marriage and the so-called sexual revolution is deeply relevant to men's lived experience and an important part of their diminished reality within the culture that removes men's traditional expectations, destroys the norms and rules we used to take for granted, be they good or ill, and yet unashamedly preser…
/r/MensRights06/03/18 11:08 AM
8

This is just the problem. Sprech should be free no matter how offensive.
/r/MensRights06/03/18 08:32 AM
24

The purpose is male shame. Male shame = female power.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 10:17 PM
3

Because all men are rapists. And that's very naughty of them.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:09 PM
2

Madness. Total madness. When will it end?
/r/MensRights05/03/18 05:07 PM
40

"But there are 18 of them. They can't all be wrong". The coffee klatch prevails.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 04:42 PM
11

"Oh go on. Be a devil..."
/r/MensRights05/03/18 01:20 PM
80

This doesn't seem like the normal or most effective modus operandi for activists. "I demand my rights but I'm not going to tell you what they are; Google them". Let's try that ourselves. Q: Are seriously trying to tell me that men are discriminated against and oppressed. It's a man's world. What rights do you not have? A: Well, (flips hair back) for one thing, I would like to not be asked what our rights are by a hysterical woman who doesn't know what it's like to be a man. I don't want to waste…
/r/MensRights05/03/18 08:38 AM
3

You’re trying way too hard just so you can keep that label. Not really. The point is not to do with me, but that there are contradictions in the the reference of the term therefore as a label it is meaningless.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 06:42 AM
2

I disagree. I'm against feminism because I'm a feminist.
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:52 AM
10

Oh yeah? Modern feminism needs to 'stop blaming men,' says Camille Paglia In Paglia's recent collection of writings from 1990 to today, Free Women, Free Men: Sex, Gender, Feminism, she argues "Women will never know who they are until they let men be men." Her key message to feminists: "Stop blaming men." http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-april-26-2017-1.4084904/modern-feminism-needs-to-stop-blaming-men-says-camille-paglia-1.4084915 Just another Feminist. (Yawn)
/r/MensRights05/03/18 12:32 AM
-1

I never know what a trans man is. Oh yeah, a woman who is trans. Ok. Good question.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 03:34 PM
1

"We"? Take me to your leader.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 03:32 PM
3

In many cases the women involved will be totally terrified (they're only women after all) and will very much want their partners to be with them right in the examination room.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:17 AM
46

Completely ridiculous. That whole thing was a laugh a minute. But this line was a full minute of laughing: Ironically, the rule is in place despite transgender women – those who were born men – being automatically invited to breast-screening appointments under NHS guidelines.
/r/MensRights04/03/18 11:16 AM
9

Actually, I think young men believe this more than women. Women know it's bullshit, especially if they have any honesty. Young men are told to be nice and non-predatory with women, so if they are unattractive and don't meet with success, very what are they to conclude except that they are horrible persons.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 07:35 PM
7

Hilarious title. Thanks for the good laugh. But yeah, you're right.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 12:17 AM
6

Call me crazy, but I like your forthright tone of voice.
/r/MGTOW28/02/18 12:08 AM
9

I have had a feeling they are trying to do that here for some time.
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:05 AM
3

WTF kind of link is that?
/r/MensRights27/02/18 01:01 AM
2

The Gender Sex Discrimination Act is symmetrical.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:37 PM
2

The article is from the BBC. So yes, it is BBC.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:34 PM
6

The sex discrimination act 197?, lord bless it, applies, at least in principle to sex discrimination: discrimination based on sex, male or female. Back in those days there were only two
/r/MensRights26/02/18 06:32 PM
33

Great pitch. Look out for him same spot next week.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:48 PM
16

But single mother Rosie Keogh won compensation for sex discrimination from a lettings agency that refused to consider her as a tenant because she was on state benefit. The cleaner and former paralegal successfully argued that blanket bans on benefit claimants indirectly discriminated against women, especially single women. This is because they are proportionately more likely to be claiming housing benefit than single men, according to official figures. So if more men were claiming benefit, that …
/r/MensRights26/02/18 12:41 PM
2

There are people out there trying to sell you services and products you may not need. Mice come because they are invited. They are invited by people who leave out food for them. They are always anxious to oblige by cleaning it up for us. For example, if you wipe down your counter top after washing up, the mouse trade union will call for all-out industrial action due to massive mouse food shortages, and nothing will get done. Leaving food out, especially grains and cereals, especially overnight, …
/r/MGTOW26/02/18 10:08 AM
0

Lol
/r/askTRP26/02/18 07:08 AM
1

Great post. Thanks.
/r/MensRights24/02/18 09:30 PM
5

Vanuatu
/r/MGTOW24/02/18 10:36 AM
1

Those characteristics (feminity of gender) though, just are how women in general behave. Hence the absurdity.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 08:05 PM
1

I was talking about meaning. Gender, so defined, has no meaning without sex. No one is denying that men can be effeminate. But what is effeminate without an observable pattern of female behaviour?
/r/MensRights23/02/18 07:47 PM
1

My answer is an emphatic yes and no.
/r/MGTOW23/02/18 06:50 PM
2

Correct. But they are also trying to detach gender, so defined, from sex, without which it has no meaning.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 06:41 PM
2

If it's physiological, that's fine. I don't have a problem with that. And everybody always knew there are hermaphrodites. The problem comes when you start talking about gender as a kind of behaviour which can only derive its meaning from patterns of observable behaviour attached to sex, and then claim it exists completely independently of sex. That's not just an exaggeration. That's an absurdity.
/r/MensRights23/02/18 05:51 PM
5

Article assumes... Time for the old gender reversal.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:28 PM
7

As I said earlier, a mass shooting is everyone's Rorschach inkblot test.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:25 PM
2

Correct. Empowerment is a postmodernist third wave feminist term adopted in contradistinction to second wave equality, in which power was zero-sum. Empowerment is defined as not zero sum, and envisages women going beyond mere social equality to regain the sexual power and privileges they already enjoyed under traditional systems whilst keeping their new-found social equality. But it can go both ways. Men's empowerment is not zero-sum either, though I would caution the model of power entailed by …
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:13 PM
49

It is difficult. They may need to resort to more traditional tactics: lying.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:07 PM
7

I see. So if he had been black, it would be a race issue. But because he wasn't, it isn't. White is the neutral race. Ok, I get it.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 09:00 PM
-1

I don't get that, sorry.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 08:49 PM
10

Yes. It is funny. I'm having a good laugh.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 05:55 PM
5

They share a badge of honor.
/r/MGTOW22/02/18 05:02 PM
379

A mass shooting is everyone's Rorschach ink blot test.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:37 PM
19

Please stop it with this grey area bigotry. By the way, there are two sexes. Despite what some bone-headed transactivists are trying to force everyone to think, they are as well defined as they always have been by the part an organism's body is naturally capable of playing in the physiology of reproduction.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 04:01 PM
1

That's ok. I'll take that, as long as they criticize her for wearing it. Later I'll take the other issue.
/r/MensRights22/02/18 01:14 PM
1

Maybe she's just a cunt. Do you think?
/r/MensRights22/02/18 10:49 AM
6

First of all, this is, imho, relevant. Secondly, I'm with the feminists. If they want to nitpick my every eye movement for taking a good look at a woman, damn it, they better nitpick the woman for taking the trouble to look good. Let's see what everybody thinks about them then. Goose and gander need an equal sauce.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 10:15 PM
0

I live dangerously, hanging by a thread, on the edge of what can be thought
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:29 PM
2

Women rule the roost behind closed doors? Oh boy. What's new? Is the Pope still Catholic?
/r/MensRights21/02/18 07:17 PM
5

You could be forgiven for thinking a university is the one place ideas could be exchanged openly, given its avowed service to the detached, rational pursuit of knowledge. And in particular, it is natural to hope a politics department would furnish open debate about politics.
/r/MGTOW21/02/18 09:50 AM
3

Welcome to the problem. But listen, my friend. There are things that cannot be said without risking offence, hatred and even jail. Yes, jail. I'm not kidding. Others have gone before you. Gandhi once said, "first they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win". Take heart. You only have two more steps to go. If you survive.
/r/MGTOW21/02/18 09:45 AM
7

It has a measure of intuitive attraction for the uninitiated, you must admit?
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 11:09 PM
13

My son, you have so much to learn. Academic life is just like the rest of life. It's all...well, politics!
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 09:07 PM
23

Suspect they laughed nervously knowing full well how right you are but also knowing that good taste requires that you don't mention it.
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 07:51 PM
2

Recent studies show 80% of women, but only 61% of men, believe in the tooth fairy. Very much had been achieved, but more needs to be done. More men need whatever medication women are on.
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 07:46 PM
3

Are you sure?
/r/MGTOW19/02/18 10:49 PM
3

Well, there was the Paris Spring of 1968, and there was a civil rights movement for Catholics in Northern Ireland around the same time, but these don't seem to have been quite so totemic in their impact.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 12:35 AM
2

Yes. She was in her element back then. She had just published Sexual Personae and was reacting to the third wave of feminism that was starting to take root.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 07:05 PM
-1

I doubt it, but he might be asked to put on some clothes. This is The Sun you are referring here. That's real grade A gutter press trash.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:57 PM
2

I'm not sure. But should we be talking about it? I think so.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:48 PM
2

Does any of this matter, now that we can all just be women on a whim?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:27 PM
1

What you're talking about is the evaluation of patriarchy rather than its meaning. Or so it seems to me. You might well take issue with the way feminism casts these traditional roles as unfair to women, or, to use the term of choice, "oppressive", but its meaning, in the sense of what it refers to, remains unchanged. You may, of course, argue that the term, in its Latin roots, means the rule of men. Agreed. But I don't bother with that, myself. I'm with Ludwig. Meaning is use, etymology notwiths…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:20 PM
0

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7y6zow/30_years_of_research_a_child_deserves_a_mother
/r/MensRights17/02/18 06:12 PM
2

Well, there was a traditional system of distribution of rights and responsibilities between men and women, closely tied to the institution of marriage, which was much more strictly maintained. Call it what you will and by all means discuss its merits for men or women, but I always just assume that is what is meant by "patriarchy". What has happened since then is that women have gained new rights, but men have kept all their responsibilities. By trying to preserve the female rights that go with t…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:51 PM
5

No. I think they knew what they were doing the first time. Believe me. They were being radical, but they can't have not known they were playing on patriarchal tropes. They just didn't care. I'm thinking here of third-wavers Cixous, Kristeva, and Irigaray.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:25 PM
5

Damn. I knew there had to be a catch somewhere.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:18 PM
7

My hunch is that you will find the answer to this by looking at the culture in the universities. Toxic feminism is third wave. It developed out of French postmodernist feminists like Cixcous (sp?), Kristeva, and one other I can never remember. They were derivative from male postmodernists Lacan, Derrida and Foucault. After the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the left had to go somewhere to keep its radical anti-authoritarian chic. It went to French postmodernism. There then followed big attempts fr…
/r/MensRights17/02/18 03:13 PM
16

Feminists are the new patriarchy™. Shhhh! Don't tell.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 02:41 PM
1

I don't understand. That's what she should be locked up for. Lying is not a criminal offence. Maybe wasting police time? What we need to change is that sex offence convictions can take place based solely on accuser testimony. Then the case would have been dropped for lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 01:16 PM
9

New?
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:45 PM
120

I'm a fan. Do they buy the ring and earn all the money as well? Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:42 PM
5

Personally, I wouldn't care, but yeah, there probably is a bit of a double.
/r/MensRights17/02/18 12:12 PM
2

Fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:08 PM
8

Yeah. Women were taught they can be anything. They weren't taught to take responsibility for it. They are still blaming everything on men, like you. This is the problem.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 11:03 PM
2

He's not the Messiah. He's a very naughty boy
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:58 PM
1

What bulge article?
/r/MensRights15/02/18 09:57 PM
3

Yes girls. I think we have the answer to our problems.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 03:19 AM
15

"Well I certainly do my best"
/r/askTRP11/02/18 03:26 AM
2

Or, as we say, a "possibility". :)
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 09:04 PM
10

I'm selling popcorn, if anyone is interested.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 09:04 PM
2

"There are women who can transcend their nature". Here we agree.
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 08:21 PM
24

I don't agree with AWALT if it refers to women's actual behaviour. I do agree with AWALT if it refers to women's deeper nature. The point is, we can transcend our nature by choosing to be MGTOW or Red Pill is neither. Why in the world would we think women can't transcend their deeper nature the same way? The assumption that we are free to choose is implicit in these discussions. We can choose to believe AWALT or not. I can accept that given the absence of social constraints on women, the vast ma…
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 06:01 PM
1

No. In fact, you assumed your point was obvious and that I was saying something obvious. Neither was the case.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:10 PM
1

Ok. Thanks. No need for the second paragraph.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 05:42 PM
2

Your point?
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:25 PM
1

Yep. That's privilege.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 01:24 PM
5

Well, this is a little embarrassing, isn't it... https://youtu.be/xHpSQAL3osY Bitch gives speech about the patriarchy and the sisterhood and being there for them.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:32 AM
4

You could always give us a pig link, if that's not too complicated for you.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:24 AM
2

/r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights09/02/18 10:11 AM
1

Dude! You said that awreddy.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:47 PM
7

It's amazing how far the #metoo movement had already come by 1860.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 08:41 PM
1

So what will happen, do you think?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 10:46 AM
2

Sounds very 1950s
/r/MensRights08/02/18 02:39 AM
2

Exactly. They keep that will hidden don't they. But if you read down, you find he died from suicide following an allegation of 'inappropriate' behaviour with women.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:12 PM
1

This assumes that it was market forces that determined the wage differential in the first place. I don't don't this assumption, I'm just saying your model makes this assumption. If true, the remaining logic is inescapable.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:10 PM
5

Plus sharp increase in the supply of cleaners, carers and cooks to the council as more men choose the jobs now that the pay has increased and the work is less risky and physically demanding. This could get interesting.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 01:07 PM
9

And, frankly, different levels of difficulty and duress.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:35 AM
1

So close and yet so far.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 10:49 AM
1

Lock, stock and barrel.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 11:51 PM
10

And the police are the ones who perverted the course of justice.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:56 PM
14

It's the police who should be prosecuted.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 05:44 PM
1

Naughty
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:50 PM
6

This does not appear to be satire. I'm confused.
/r/MGTOW04/02/18 12:45 AM
1

It was a bit naughty I admit.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 02:16 AM
1

Oh rly?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:23 PM
1

'appropriate'? Are you calling me 'toxic'? Lol In a related development, I once saw a fellow ask 'Excuse me, madam, do you have a ticket for those bags?' That got them shifted quickly. But no, the idea that the force of law should bear on men when legspreading, surely demands scrutiny. Toxic bagspreading bitches should be acted upon decisively and with a slight turn off the mouth. Let mirth, generosity and a sense of consistency prevail.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 11:29 AM
1

Ummm..yes. Quite. Herein lies the contradiction.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:41 AM
1

I think they would say under the influence of feminism, women no longer care about men, especially in the absence of any constraint forcing them to do so. I don't think they would say women would never care about men.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:38 AM
1

Maybe you're just jealous, piggie? ;)
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:34 AM
13

Nobody says women don't care about men. The claim is feminists don't care about men or men's issues. Women certainly care about both. Less than 10% of women identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:08 PM
1

Go overboard. Drive them kwazey. Lol.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 09:44 PM
2

I think 'inappropriate' is used in a similar way. Time was it used to mean not proper to the context or occasion. Just as toxic used to mean harmful to the body.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:02 PM
3

Toxic masculinity. But now it's starting to appear in things like 'my narcissistic mother is toxic'. Word frequency is definitely up.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:28 PM
1

It's funny, and I hate to say this, but in some parts 'bag' is a pejorative for 'woman'.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:19 PM
1

My pleasure (doffs fedora)
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:17 PM
4

No. That would be space invasion: a 70s video game or a crime, depending on your luck.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:17 PM
8

Because they alone have the education, resolve and strength of mind to resist the forces of patriarchy and transcend the sex object status into which society casts women. Besides, not all working class women are willing to prostitute their bodies in public, and those who do should be prevented from doing so. What is being banned here is an oppressive institutional practice. It is right that society should make a judgement about the institution as a whole, even if it does diminish the freedom of …
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:56 AM
8

As third wave feminist / Victorian sex-negativity continues, innocent you-show-me I'll-show-you becomes a national crime wave
/r/MensRights29/01/18 01:50 AM
2

7% of women identify as feminists.
/r/askTRP22/01/18 05:52 PM
2

Is basically when she doesn't love you as much as you love her.
/r/askTRP22/01/18 05:45 PM
0

Shit tested twice, failed on the second. You have failed, are a failure, and will always be a failure. /s
/r/askTRP22/01/18 11:39 AM
1

Well that certainly seems complicated.
/r/MensRights22/01/18 11:36 AM
6

Because discrimination is verboten.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:43 PM
3

Propose marriage
/r/askTRP21/01/18 07:52 PM
-1

I think we should be toxic, like modern feminism.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:42 PM
1

What you wanna do is protest WITH them. You could try one of 2 strategies: 1) "Destroy the patriarchy. Equal representation for women in combat deaths." 2) "Women are the better half. Destroy men now!"
/r/MGTOW20/01/18 08:46 PM
1

No. You must never give the guardian clicks. They are an ineluctable empire of evil and you are an instrument of darkness for assisting them. /s
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:34 AM
8

Open that bad guy shit up
/r/askTRP17/01/18 11:40 PM
2

Oh no. Don't fuck her. Give the guy a heads up.
/r/askTRP17/01/18 10:33 PM
9

If it were me, I would tell her fiancé.
/r/askTRP17/01/18 08:45 PM
2

What the fuck are you on about?
/r/MensRights17/01/18 04:47 PM
4

Well, yes. I do. But think of children.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:25 PM
2

Feminists down the mines, now!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:39 PM
1

Don't forget the banned /r/incels , now at www.incels.me
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:37 PM
6

Bitching about psychos is a waste of time we all know they exist. We do?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:01 PM
1

Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:00 PM
1

Err..yes. that's what I meant.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:50 PM
1

K
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:49 PM
2

Is that you randy? I thought your mother told you to stay OFF THE COMPUTER.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:40 PM
2

Are you sure?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:35 PM
2

Necrophilia taken to the next dimension.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:35 PM
1

You're being downvoted because you're an obvious troll. Fuck off and never come back. Why? Who are you: chief of the troll police? What is a troll anyway? How do we know you're not one? "Obvious"? Obviously not obvious, but maybe.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:38 PM
3

Safety eats itself alive.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:36 PM
1

A synopsis for the video challenged...?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:35 PM
0

GenderCritical might be worth a look
/r/MensRights16/01/18 12:32 PM
2

How is this relevant to men's rights? I'm leaving it as an exercise.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:15 AM
2

How is this relevant to men's rights? Use your imaginations. Can you believe this is for real?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:09 AM
5

Where is the vent?
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:56 AM
3

Latest I can see, there are now more female doctors than male. Certainly, that's the way it seems to be going. This is a profession that used to be completely male dominated. I'm my view, this is fine. Now, to destroy the patriarchy, we need feminists down the mines as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 07:53 AM
3

She already showed up at your job and got you fired? 🤤
/r/MensRights13/01/18 12:50 PM
8

...because women aren't normally able to think rationally or abstractly. You heard it here first.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 10:51 PM
8

No. It's a power trait. It's essentially good taste for the liberal elite.
/r/askTRP02/01/18 03:27 AM
3

Weird. I don't have any problem getting news results for "misandry" https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=misandry&client=ms-android-hms-vf-fr&prmd=niv&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjvqqjrp7HYAhVMKcAKHXNdBPcQ_AUIESgB&biw=360&bih=560 Are you sure you're not just trying to troll my ass?
/r/MensRights30/12/17 08:26 AM
2

Aposite
/r/MensRights23/12/17 07:44 AM
74

The victim must always be believed == "the accused must always be condemned"
/r/MensRights21/12/17 04:39 PM
2

I would personally love to go in there and give her a piece of my mind. There is more power in a well-reasoned and well-evidenced argument than you are likely to appreciate. It's not so much your grades as the bias and, I suspect, the dereliction of academic duty. I'd say you could really tear a piece off her, but I don't know for sure, and I don't know the possible consequences for you. I'm an idealist. But sometimes you can really regret not getting angry enough.
/r/askTRP20/12/17 03:34 PM
1

One does not become, but rather is born, a man.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 11:26 AM
2

Dude. All you have to do is tell them you could give them a good raping if they're interested. Problem solved in a trice.
/r/askTRP20/12/17 11:07 AM
4

Exactly. And the constraints of evidence and argument should always be available openly to all practitioners in a field. The university has a purpose: the detached, rational pursuit of knowledge and understanding. It stands above and beyond mere commerce.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 10:46 AM
2

Wait... You're on campus? You're a student? Your academic career could be in jeopardy. You should take this very seriously and yes, get a lawyer. Have you not heard of title ix?
/r/askTRP20/12/17 01:11 AM
3

Some women fantasize about being raped. https://www.theatlantic.com/sexes/archive/2013/06/when-rape-is-a-fantasy/276933/
/r/askTRP20/12/17 01:08 AM
5

I don't expect you to believe anything. There is this if you're at all interested.
/r/askTRP20/12/17 12:57 AM
2

Well, these are two different things. Socially, girls will secretly be excited by such a reputation. It won't harm you in the least. Physically, girls can get guys to beat up or even in some cases kill those they accuse of raping them. But the guys would have to basically believe the girl. It's hard to judge from here what the chances are of that.
/r/askTRP20/12/17 12:42 AM
15

There's really nothing you can do. You will be presumed guilty until proven innocent. You should probably avoid contacting her and get a lawyer. That's the usual advice, plus preserve any evidence you might have, like texts from her, for example.
/r/askTRP20/12/17 12:23 AM
5

Interesting. You haven't really answered head on. Do you think it a fit field of academic enquiry at a modern university? I suspect not What I pressing is your assumption that there are no independent criteria for judging whether a field is proper to an academic institution other than student demand. So my next question would be why not astrology? And I would hope to tease out independent criteria for judging which have a proper place and which do not. But I suspect you saw this coming, and cunn…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:17 AM
8

So quick question. How do you feel about astrology as an academic department?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:35 PM
3

She's gone?
/r/MensRights19/12/17 11:34 PM
11

I agree with Janice, but I think the he same objection applies to international relations, which, unlike women's studies, covers for mass murder.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 06:21 PM
-2

I mean, some of these subs are so censorious all you can do is leave them and hope they will collapse under the weight of their own sins in the long run.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:16 AM
0

Bijan may have been a victim of racism, but he was also a victim of misandry and paedohysteria, being accused of being a pedophile, in the way only a man can be, on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. I don't know why there is no mention that he was arrested on suspicion of being a pedophile, after being falsely accused, and was then murdered by his accusers some days after his release. Granted, racism may have been an element in all this, but it was by no means the only part, and may not even …
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:06 AM
2

So set up your own sub where posts get deleted if they don't use "bitch".
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:50 PM
3

Major lol. "Surely you're joking, Mr Feynman".
/r/TheRedPill17/12/17 01:47 AM
2

The more whites and the less whites. Cappuccinos and mochas. Such binary thinking can always prevail.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:59 PM
6

Robert Mugabe tried that already. Didn't work out.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:58 PM
1

Have you seen the moment when Ben Shapiro asks "why aren't you sixty"? https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=why+aren%27t+you+sixty&oq=why+aren%27t+you+sixty&aqs=chrome..69i57.7848j0j4&client=ms-android-hms-vf-fr&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8 Classic!
/r/MensRights12/12/17 03:15 PM
1

Dude: We're talking morals, not law. I knew the law. You are patently not fine if you don't want to fuck your co workers, necessarily. Please keep up. But thanks for the useful legal reprise.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:29 AM
1

Yes. Aware.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 10:29 PM
2

Well yes, carl sergeant is just the type I have in mind. There's another guy the Labour party covered up, allegedly.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 06:27 PM
3

Sounds like you sexually harassed a girl in college and got called out on your bullshit. Sounds like you don't have an argument.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:16 PM
8

So that chap decided to kill himself if he was charged, and changed his mind with the arrival of his daughter. But when people kill themselves in these circumstances, it is evidence of their guilt. If they were innocent, what were they afraid of? They would surely stay to fight the day and live again. Is there a chance, on the other hand, that they see how impossible it is to prove innocence in the face of the presumption of guilt, and seeing how fully they are and will be reviled by friend and …
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:12 PM
2

Because my right to choose my gender supercedes your right to choose how to represent me. You can call me an idiot, a bastard, a capitalist, a conspiracy theorist or a dog, but heaven forbid you call a man or a woman without my permission.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:59 PM
1

Not sure what your point is. Want, need. We can all choose.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:20 PM
4

One way is to look at these two situations, that is, men and women and the respective roles they play, as entirely symmetrical. I have expressly chosen the other way. If they are symmetrical, then indeed as you say, the part men play in exploiting women's bodies is no more significant than the part women play in exploiting in men's bodies. On this view, persons have bodies almost by accident. One happens to be either male or female, but possesses an equal sex urge depending on the disembodied mi…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:09 PM
2

If a woman bribes a man who is in power - he has the right to say no. If a woman is bribed by a man who is in power the issue at hand is the fact that the woman is in need of a job is to their advantage. That's what I meant by saying it's not symmetrical. Bear in mind, however, the recruiter may very much want that particular candidate, in your example.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:06 PM
7

Is not symmetrical, no. But to attempt to bribe a public official is still commendable, though less so than the official demanding a bribe. This is an analogy. EDIT: condemnable*
/r/MensRights11/12/17 09:19 AM
9

Who is exploitng who?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 09:17 AM
9

Snap. Oddly, I had the same thought reading the same article. See my post.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:11 AM
1

Fear
/r/askTRP10/12/17 04:24 PM
8

You need to stop thinking of them as anything important. If you don't have anything you want to say to them, or they don't say anything to you, is doesn't matter. They're irrelevant.
/r/askTRP10/12/17 03:54 PM
4

None of this matters. They're total hypocrites.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 12:19 PM
1

Do you now? So you concede that victimhood status is something to be desired: a treasure?
/r/MensRights10/12/17 01:13 AM
2

The answers here seem very defensive. No one, apart maybe from the gay guy, who says he "objects", has actually come out and said "yes, I feel sexually harassed". Telling. I think the point is really the double standard. Of course, you could ask another question as well. "Do women actually feel sexually harassed when men touch them?". You'd better be sure they don't, necessarily. But try asking that of a feminist forum. Immediate ban. There's another double standard. But the situations are not s…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:44 PM
7

"idiot fucking liar" is a confounding variable.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:55 PM
1

Feminist™ feminists don't want social power. They want sexual power. Going after non-elite men makes perfect sense, and is of a piece with women's hypergamy.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 04:41 PM
2

No.
/r/askTRP07/12/17 02:36 PM
2

In a surprise development, gran of 10, Stephie Greenweather, revealed a consent form signed by the troublesome teen before the "inappropriate incident" occurred, allegedly. Read more...
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:52 PM
3

OUTRAGE AT GRAN IN KISS ASSAULT DRAMA.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:59 PM
1

Also here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/in-wake-of-weinstein-men-wonder-if-hugging-women-still-ok/2017/12/04/91eca0e8-d92b-11e7-a241-0848315642d0_story.html
/r/MensRights05/12/17 11:31 AM
-9

Umm, I know this. That's why I said "corporate and state agencies, acting in concert to protect preferred ideologies".
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:22 PM
14

Fair point. I'm all for consistency in the application of this nonsense, at the very least.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:48 PM
6

Yes. That's what I meant about the schadenfreude.
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:43 PM
4

I, too, am upset by this. I don't think men are scum, but I would go to my grave to protect the free speech rights of someone who thinks they are. The first amendment requires a distinction between speech and action, and this speech causes no actual man any harm. I am disgusted by this new juridical climate in which speech is censored by corporate and state agencies, acting in concert to protect a preferred ideology, and persons are considered guilty of sex offences until proven innocent. All of…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 12:26 PM
4

Quite agree. But observe now. Puritans getting on board with the feminist message. Revealing!
/r/MensRights04/12/17 01:17 AM
3

Isn't this a bit like trying to bribe a public official? While quid pro quo sexual harassment is like demanding a bribe. But why is one ok but not the other?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:34 PM
9

Don't you just love the words? "Uncomfortable". "Need to be part of the conversation". Who thinks this stuff up? I hope their getting all paid. So soft, lilting and innocuous.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:20 PM
8

The relief I feel is palpable. This Xmas season I couldn't decide whether to tear a woman's clothes off, dig into her rebellious frame with my teeth and thrust my ramrod violently between her thighs. I keep forgetting whether that is what you're supposed to do after the business with the mistletoe. Fortunately, I visit the mensrights subreddit and this helpful police message clears things up nicely. Thank you. /s
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:52 PM
1

Aging media star axed after socialise-rape claims. Distressed dad reveals daughter's agony.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:45 PM
1

K
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:30 PM
7

Obviously quite a lot. Women need reminding not to rape men. You know how they keep forgetting.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:09 PM
1

K
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:41 PM
0

Oh. So your theory of evolution is not Darwinian natural selection. What is it then?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 02:02 PM
0

If you're a strict Darwinian, are you not committed to the conclusion that feminism is an adaptation determined by our genes?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 01:52 PM
1

Indeed, but that's the part I don't understand. If the force of evolution by natural selection has ineluctably created us, how is it possible to transcend it through an act of will?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 10:30 AM
1

It's just a sign of being a competent, mature person, which we find attractive. Wait. "We"? So you're a woman?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 06:13 AM
2

So feminists are worried about lonely guys not picking up women? That's nice of them. Certainly makes a change.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:26 AM
3

Ok. It doesn't work. Then what are feminists worried about?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:19 AM
3

And does it work?
/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:03 AM
2

The relation is in background social change that has brought about a perceived need for all three.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:05 AM
5

The redpill is about getting sex with women. Correct. Now, how do you propose to do that. Either:- A. With their consent. B. Not with their consent. Redpill opts for A. Its focus is not on raping women (B), but on giving them what they want (A). It no more manipulates women than women manipulate men with fashion attire, jewelry and makeup. It gives women what they want or it fails, on its own terms. Why feminism derides it, well, there's the question.
/r/MensRights03/12/17 12:04 AM
1

Perhaps "female supremacism"?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:51 PM
6

Nothing. They're not completely unrelated. Clarifying their relationship, however, may serve to differentiate them.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 08:49 PM
3

Oh yes. The whole "bad faith" thing. You are subordinating me to the constraint of discursive rationality instead of just accepting my authority. Yes. This has a name. It's called "batshit crazy".
/r/MensRights02/12/17 06:41 PM
11

It's a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 03:55 PM
10

Worth bearing in mind.
/r/MensRights23/11/17 01:04 AM
1

Yeah. Right. Did you really have to go through my post history? Is it that bad? You can find nothing with which to disagree in what I'm saying now? I'll take that as a compliment.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:00 PM
1

There we will have to disagree. I see it as dishonest.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 01:48 PM
1

The article presumes an analogy between Antifa and the fight against fascism in Spain, which is precisely the point at issue, and attempts to create the the impression the Watson did not know Orwell fought the fascists.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 12:11 PM
18

It's weird. They say, "it's about time that we stopped being squeamish about women's bodies". But who the fuck is being squeamish about women's bodies? We've got calls for politicians to resign because the "fleetingly" touched a woman's knee. I don't feel in the least squeamish about women's bodies. Are you kidding? Me? Being publicly condemned as a sex-pest, on the other hand, has me all come over and...umm...uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:35 AM
4

It's called a "hit piece" and is, if anything, a step or two more dishonest than infowars.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 02:06 AM
8

I'm not here to defend that chap, whose videos I don't much like, but my goodness that is a most disingenuous article, even by the impressive standards of the corporate media. Frankly, I think this sort of utter garbage "journalism" ought to be beneath us.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:44 PM
2

It's just as well go didn't "fleetingly" touch the producer's gave. EDIT: Sorry, let me try that again: It's just as well he didn't "fleetingly" touch the producer's face.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:37 PM
1

In any case, it hasn't really gone to voat. It's gone to incels.me
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:16 AM
0

They are mostly men for some reason, so their right to speak is strictly speaking a men's right. But I agree with you. They are not very nice. I think as long as we dissociate ourselves with them, we should be fine. We should be for some men's rights, not all. /s
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:43 PM
1

Whether you agree with what they say is beside the point though. The question is whether they ought to be allowed to say it. Freedom of speech is freedom to say what is ok or not ok.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 10:36 AM
8

/r/incels is really gone in addition to a whole slew of subs that were created for them to migrate to. This happened about a week ago. We're not allowed to talk about it in the spurious pretexts that they were not men's rights activists and that Reddit is a private organization.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 11:30 PM
4

According to our mod /u/mensmod we're not allowed to talk about this because it's irrelevant. He removed my thread on the topic. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7biq9s/it_doesnt_matter_that_rincels_has_been_banned_we/dpjhwcq
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:59 PM
1

PS yes. Many of your warnings are unnecessary, pigman.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 08:06 AM
1

Just 2 votes and no comments after 5 hours? What is happening to this sub? Jessica Valenti got 369.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:54 PM
1

Shhh! They'll call you a witch.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 01:14 AM
1

What the fuck is this guy /u/mensmod talking about, and why is he a mod here? You go back a long way here. Do you not think there is something suspicious about him or her?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:41 PM
2

Tone policing????
/r/MensRights09/11/17 10:36 PM
2

So what the fuck is that meant to mean, Mr mod. It's not your responsibility to educate me? Last time I heard that it was from one of those logic-resisting passive aggressive feminists. Who are you? Has this sub gone full on feminazi already? Go ahead. Ban me. Cunt!
/r/MensRights09/11/17 09:42 PM
2

That isn't an answer to my question. Why are you so ignorant?
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:45 PM
1

You might as well have said that about the printing press.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:21 PM
1

I just don't buy that. I suppose i should ask you for evidence. You know, that sub had a whole counter-sub that would post stuff there deliberately to get it a bad name. Others were just spitting out crazy stuff out of emptiness and bitter frustration with their lives. They were ready to ignore and really quite harmless. Any advocacy of violence could have been individually removed.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:20 PM
1

I really think if there are proponents of child rape they should be allowed to advocate it, and if you really think it should be outlawed, then you should be confident you can win the debate and show them to be wrong. Then the public could be better placed to see exactly what is wrong with it. The actual harmful activity itself should of course be outlawed and vigorously prosecuted. I think this way serves the greater good. And I really didn't see any advocacy for child rape in that sub. And if …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:14 PM
2

So I run a store but refuse to serve honkies. Am I violating race laws? It's my private business.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 06:01 PM
6

If you don't interview Karen Straughan you'll be fit for execution. (Figuratively speaking, mods). Oh, wait, she was never a feminist. Ok, I think that one in Toronto is up your street. Trying to remember her name. Literature professor. Fiamengo. Janice Fiamengo! She would be bang on. There's also that philosophy professor. Name begins with S. Christina Hoff-Sommers. She still describes herself as a feminist but really she's mostly in line with us. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zolPHC562WA Sone …
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:50 PM
3

Any non-ex-feminists here? I'd like to talk to you
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:48 PM
8

Clone rape victim reveals ordeal.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 11:25 AM
1

Well, no. But the right of men to talk harmlessly about whatever they please is arguably a right they ought to have, and therefore relevant. I sincerely wanted to know whether you remember those days. You see, i take the long view. The days we were being treated as incels now are seem like yesterday. We had all sorts of preparations for being banned. We may still be, especially in this #metoo climate, which to me looks like a rather frightening hysteria. But I take your point. Incels never purpo…
/r/MensRights09/11/17 01:10 AM
2

Were you here when people all over Reddit were advising this sub of rape apology and promoting violence against women? Some still do, of course, bit it was much more prevalent then. We used to very heavily bombarded by SRS and there were frequent calls to have us banned. It seems Reddit doesn't have a grip on the narrative of history. We live in an unending present unable to see whence we have come and where we are going.
/r/MensRights09/11/17 12:26 AM
1

How does that work in the example situation I gave?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:14 PM
0

Still throwing out that tired accusation. Ok.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 11:12 PM
2

Thanks. A simple 'no' would have sufficed. But now, should one not allow the false view that rape ought to be legal to be expressed the better to illuminate the truth by comparison and to show what is wrong with that view?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 09:37 PM
1

I certainly don't willfully misconstrue you. I will check what you wrote. You don't justify taking something from someone by saying it's for the 'greater good'.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 08:08 PM
1

Ah. Changing the subject. I take it you can't answer my point.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:53 PM
1

In your opinion, should people be allowed to debate whether rape should be legal?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:52 PM
0

Exactly. Go shitpost somewhere else. Leave incels alone. Perfect.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:28 PM
0

The principle of freedom of speech is concerned primarily with advancing our shared knowledge. No one is an ultimate arbiter of shared knowledge. If we silence what we take to be false, we risk losing what is in fact true. History is replete with examples of voices silenced then for vicious falsehoods, and taken to be profoundly true now. So yes, a private organisation has the legal authority to ban inconvenient speech, but it can no longer maintain its purpose is to advance knowledge and unders…
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:16 PM
1

Ah. Thank you. A man goes off with a gun in a densely populated urban area. The police purpose to take the gun from him. They justify their proposal with reference to the greater good. How does your principle fare under this hypothesis? 🏟️
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:54 PM
0

...right to speak?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 06:51 PM
1

So does the pig support the ban?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:22 PM
1

Can't quite figure out what you mean? Happy to screw myself.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:18 PM
1

And it wasn't Jews. It was socialists. Wake up, piggie.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:17 PM
0

Oh. The pig. Actually I was. And I was being ironic. But that's too subtle for hoary old pigs. Calm down and control yourself. Lol.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:15 PM
1

Well said!
/r/MensRights08/11/17 05:10 PM
-1

Well. I think they were. But do you think everything should be banned from which nothing good is coming?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:42 AM
2

Ah! An original thinker!
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:40 AM
2

So what?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:38 AM
0

Correct. Ban everything that is not helping.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 07:33 AM
-1

Exactly. We wouldn't want to be mixed up with that now, would we?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:27 AM
0

Oh, look. My post brought SRS out of the woodwork.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 04:19 AM
4

Well, no. Me, actually. But I've done something really weird in the past. I read this book by a crazed nineteenth century extremist called John Stuart Mill. That guy thought people should be able to say and do what they please as long as they don't do anyone any actual harm. Thankfully, that sort of dangerous liberal thinking is long gone. But he made your very point as one in a catalogue of reasons for permitting speech no matter how false. I was just paraphrasing the way he put it. I wouldn't …
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:59 AM
1

Can you explain that like I'm 5, please?
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:44 AM
6

Let their folly be better illuminated so that the light of truth can shine more brightly.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:43 AM
11

There might be some value in caring about the freedom of speech of those who say things we disagree with.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:23 AM
1

I know. Can you imagine all those ugly, women-despised men coming here to post. Pretty soon women would despise us too. Then we could end up, you know, brigaded by SRS and reviled across the internet, afraid to speak out at all. That really would be the last straw.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 03:10 AM
-4

The freedom for men who are involuntarily celibate to come together and share their problems with each other is a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:54 AM
17

Agreed. Everyone who doesn't promote goodness can be banned. We don't need to care.
/r/MensRights08/11/17 02:45 AM
3

In a surprise development, men like to fuck women. Over to Patricia for more on this breaking scandal...
/r/MensRights31/10/17 11:41 AM
16

Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights31/10/17 09:57 AM
3

Africa? Don't you mean New Jersey?
/r/TheRedPill30/10/17 05:51 PM
3

He didn't just touch her knee. He made her feel UNCOMFORTABLE. Now that's criminal. But it leads me to wonder, what if...she had enjoyed it? Gentlemen, please! Calm yourselves. I speak hypothetically, of course
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:21 PM
2

A horse? Really? Disgraceful! EDIT: I mean, no horse deserves this.
/r/MensRights29/10/17 09:10 PM
2

Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights29/10/17 08:19 PM
5

I see. So in your view we should talk to all African-Americans about violent street crime because: Only African-Americans commit these crimes, and/or Each African-American bears some responsibility for the conduct of the group because of culture. In that case, I agree; the analogy fails. But likewise, returning to the other end of the analogy, perhaps each man bears some responsibility for the conduct of the group because of culture. Are you not committed to this conclusion? For my part, whilst …
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 05:54 PM
13

Doesn't matter. Our opponents would accuse us of racism. And by their own logic they are hanged. That is as far as the analogy needs to go.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 05:08 PM
-2

It's a perfect analogy precisely because if anyone were to use it they would be condemned, quite rightly, as racists. Nazi
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 04:08 PM
234

Cf. "We must challenge all African-Americans about inner city violent street crime".
/r/TheRedPill29/10/17 02:38 PM
2

I'm a genius and I'm struggling.
/r/MensRights27/10/17 03:11 AM
1

Well, if you want to call me an asshole, that's up to you. Your friend, meanwhile, comes here representing the opinion of a member of his illustrious harem, namely that men's issues arise out of the patriarchy and therefore we should all be feminists. To this tired argument the reply is as simple as it is elegant: if the penis is true, it follows that feminists ought to support men's rights to fight the patriarchy. Any serious commenter would have at least addressed the point. But no, your frien…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 02:12 AM
1

You come here. You personally attack me for posting in other subs after personally mining my personal post history, you tell me not to post here any more as if you are the sub's private police, you try to anger shame me, you then start posting male anger-shaming videos and then you call me a troll. And then you accuse me of being personal. Yes. I'm watching you, troll.
/r/MensRights26/10/17 11:44 AM
1

No. I'm not changing my position. I was always following his logic. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/77huuc/z/dom9dw2
/r/MensRights25/10/17 10:19 PM
0

By his logic, an FGMist. By mine, it's irrelevant.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 06:21 PM
2

So this has been going on for a couple of months. It's time for the left to ditch feminism³.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 12:00 PM
2

Turns out that bitch is a professional tear producer. In a completely unrelated context, I found her bursting into a restaurant and doing big tears for the chickens, her friends. Embarrassing! This is completely manufactured tear femprivilege at work. A quite spectacular example! Norman is not impressed by crocodiles. Laser-like judgement.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 11:56 AM
2

Precisely not what Finkelstein is saying.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 08:54 AM
1

He's posted in menslib, therefore he must support menslib and should get back there, right? I'm just going by his logic. Read his post history again.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 06:38 AM
1

I see. Yep. This sounds familiar.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:50 AM
6

"almost 90% of you have pain and anger on the back of that paper". Should be right up your street, right? Male anger-shaming. We're used to it here. Take this shit back to menslib.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:41 AM
2

Menslib feminist comes here and tells us what we should be talking about. If you're questioning its relevance, I'd say it has quite a lot to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:33 AM
1

What were you before? And what took you so long?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 05:25 AM
1

What's weird about it, if I may ask?
/r/MensRights25/10/17 04:34 AM
3

Yes it's him, left icon turned MRA, seemingly. And I suspect the left will now desert him in his present difficulties, because, as you may have noticed, they mostly have third wave bullshit feminism right up the middle of their assholes, and nothing frightens third wave feminists more than the thought of an MRA n their fridge. So I though you folks ought to know. It's not exactly Laci Green, but still. Norman has always stood up for justice, not causes.
/r/MensRights25/10/17 04:33 AM
2

Frankly I was disappointed that as a trained philosopher she wasn't able to respond better. But what do I know?
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:41 AM
2

Agreed. Post reported for misleading title.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:19 AM
2

Misleading title. Your title says "is allowed". The linked article says "could be allowed". The two are not the same.
/r/MensRights23/10/17 09:13 AM
4

Now, before I get into this I want to remind everyone that trans women are women, and trans men are men. Before I begin, let me just remind you of the highly implausible contention which we must now take as axiomatic, no matter how controversial. Ok, thanks! Had it not been for this useful clarification, I would have mistaken trans women for men who think they're women and vice versa. But I'm nuts, evidently. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 01:29 AM
6

On a related, but tangential note, a proportion of women responding to the survey published as "My Secret Garden", by Nancy Friday, reported fantasizing about being raped. I don't think this has ever been properly addressed, neither by feminists nor the MRM.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 11:55 PM
2

Great answer to a different question.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 05:38 PM
2

No. THIS is trolling. I conclude you are 3 week old sleeping and quite sophisticated troll. Trolling is not name-calling or dissenting. It's trying to provoke for the sake of provocation without any genuine desire to engage in debate on any serious level. Congratulations troll.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:42 PM
1

Word policing is what belongs elsewhere. And if you're so serious, why not tell me why "cunt" is worse than "dick", since words are so much your thing, doctor?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:38 PM
1

And "troll" isn't a name? For a medic you might want to think a bit straighter. And you're the one who started going through people's post history. I really think it's a bit rich of you to come here and try to shame people for posting in controversial subs. How are the mighty fallen, conceited little cunt. And yes, I like "cunt".
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:36 PM
1

No. Calling names is not trolling.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:33 PM
1

And how does any of that excuse male shaming? "I have a girlfriend. You don't. You ought to be ashamed. (Not that you know I don't, of course)". "Picking up girls does not come naturally to you. You have to study redpill techniques and disrespect women. Girls just flock to me because I'm cool" What the fuck is this shit? No. We don't agree. I have never treated anyone like that I'm my life. I am used to if from femiville, but what the fuck is it doing here? If you really care about how things re…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:33 PM
1

So "dick" is OK? A better man world see past the word to the point. I would expect more of a medic.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:27 PM
1

So about the same moral and logical status as trying to shame people for posting in redpill or incels. What a fuck you are.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:26 PM
1

All the same, femiville illogics like you might want remember, disagreeing is NOT trolling, and f it is, there's nothing wrong with it and ought to be encouraged by anyone who cares about the light of truth. But since you don't want to address anything I actually say, I'm done talking with you.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:22 PM
1

What exactly ARE you doing here? You have been on Reddit for 3 weeks, you post on menslib, a feminist sub, and you come here trying to male shame us and telling us to post elsewhere. And you do nothing to actually address the salient points that are being made. If ever I smelt a hidden agenda, the stench is strong with this one.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:13 PM
1

I don't know what he wrote, but femiville illogics like you might want remember, disagreeing is NOT trolling, it if it is, there's nothing wrong with it and ought to be encouraged by anyone who cares about the light of truth.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:07 PM
1

What do you know about logic, you ad homineming cuck?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:05 PM
0

Just so you know, this is an open sub and I can say whatever I want. I don't need cunts line you trying to redpill-shame me. You don't know a fucking thing about me. I've been posting here for five years plus and you come here and tell me to leave. Fuck off, cunt. If you don't have anything to say to address the point and instead attack your faux idea of the man then you are the one who doesn't belong here. That sort of gutless ad hominem will find a better home in femiville. What the fuck do yo…
/r/MensRights20/10/17 01:03 PM
0

So nothing logical, then. Just the usual dick reaction to "cunt". No bias there I'm sure. And wooshing the main point: if men's issues are women's issues, the cunt ought to support men's issues in order to fight the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/10/17 09:38 AM
1

Why?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 02:38 AM
-1

So you are delighted to have this cunt join the MRM, right?
/r/MensRights20/10/17 12:45 AM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/asktrp/comments/768zkb/weistein_stuff_messing_with_my_mojo/
/r/askTRP16/10/17 09:39 AM
3

Language Timothy!
/r/askTRP15/10/17 10:38 PM
2

Hello Oh hi, it's me, JustSomeThief oh hi, how are you doing? I'm fine, how are you? Good. That's great. I want to have a nice date, go to a bar next to my house, and if you're attractive, have sex with you. [..]
/r/askTRP15/10/17 10:16 PM
1

It was their privilege.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 06:13 PM
2

Yes. I noticed that, but still, think of the potatoes.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 03:56 PM
39

The kid was 16. The age of consent in the state of Idaho is 16, but a teacher is held to a higher standard as a person in authority.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 12:32 PM
0

I'm afraid I'm not convinced. I'm only five years old.
/r/MensRights14/10/17 02:52 AM
2

Simple. You just apply the Antioch rules: https://90swoman.wordpress.com/2010/06/03/the-antioch-rules-sexual-offence-prevention-policy/
/r/askTRP14/10/17 12:49 AM
0

That's what I meant by "80% of our genes are from women".
/r/MensRights13/10/17 11:33 PM
0

It has to be that 80 percent of our genes are from women. But my ancestors must be 50% male and by extension, so must all our ancestors. That's a bit tricky
/r/MensRights13/10/17 09:45 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:51 PM
1

Y
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:49 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:49 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:49 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:49 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:49 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:48 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:48 PM
1

The central issue here, I think, is paedohsteria, a witch hunt climate, rather than race or disability. Suspicion may have been heightened by his race or disability, but it was the combined beliefs that he was a paedophile and that the state cannot or will not go far enough in prosecuting and punishing this worse-than-murder crime that primarily motivated the murder.
/r/MensRights10/10/17 03:48 PM
2

Interesting interpretation
/r/MensRights09/10/17 07:45 PM
7

So you're saying they raped because they had diminished prospects with women. Is that it?
/r/MensRights09/10/17 06:10 PM
1

Ok. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 01:04 PM
1

Another fuckin video? Why don't you just answer the question? I've no idea who she is, but that's probably just me. Never mind.
/r/MensRights09/10/17 03:55 AM
3

be careful
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:27 PM
1

Who are you even talking about?
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:18 PM
9

Yes. The key point is that an acceptance is just a unitary proposition: "1. yes". A refusal, on the other hand, is dual: "1. no and 2. you ought to be thoroughly ashamed of yourself for asking, since you're are making me feel uncomfortable, you predatory little toxic waste molecule".
/r/MensRights06/10/17 02:24 PM
1

The teacher, not the pupil, is the naive party here. What a load of bs.
/r/MensRights05/10/17 04:45 PM
1

Maybe you're just a cuck. Lighten up a bit and take a more positive attitude. Girls can sense your negativity.
/r/askTRP04/10/17 10:56 AM
1

Now he's buggered off, removed the post and deleted his account. Don't you just love these people's bold commitment to their cause, born of years of endurance and hardship.
/r/MensRights04/10/17 09:42 AM
2

Thank you
/r/MensRights04/10/17 08:24 AM
2

Fascinating. Maybe I should go in under cover.
/r/MensRights03/10/17 09:59 PM
8

Guy from /r/gendercritical thinks this sub's main interest in this issue is to "gain access" to the college in order to "assault" the women. Lol
/r/MensRights03/10/17 08:59 PM
3

Come on guys. How is this not hilarious?
/r/MensRights03/10/17 07:52 PM
3

Friendly word. Some women care less about their child than themselves and will use their child for private financial gain. I know nothing of your particular case, but your reasoning as it stands does not convince me. I wish you well and hope for the best.
/r/askTRP02/10/17 06:49 AM
7

At least part of the problem is a change in the institution of marriage: its breakdown and its reconfiguration in favor of women.
/r/askTRP01/10/17 05:32 PM
1

I'd be a bit more discerning of I were you.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:07 PM
1

Yes, there's much to agree with there and that's the sort of thing I'm talking about, yet I don't agree with everything and at the same time the treatment of the issue doesn't seem to go far and deep enough. The underpinning biology that arendt alludes to ripples through all our social sex-roles and the question of a casual link is completely overlooked within prevailing orthodoxy.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:19 PM
0

Lol. I looked up my ass and there it was. How did you know?
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:53 PM
1

I thank the good splodge for his linked video which I am now viewing.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:27 PM
1

No kidding.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 03:25 PM
0

No. It's nature you fuck. Choices are after nature has taken course. Men and women are different by nature and feminists won't acknowledge it and you're colluding with them. Not my area my ass.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:44 AM
1

Well, we'll just have to see.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:27 AM
1

Word play
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:16 AM
1

I can't make sense of this.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:11 AM
3

Bullshit. Feminists have been complaining about men testing women as objects for decades. Yet all around I see women parcelling themselves up for the make gaze. Wtf? Plainly they're not equal. Women hold all the power and no one is calling feminists on it. This is bullshit. Mensrights bullshit. Afraid of beyond called red pill. Red pill are right about this. Why don't we just admit it. Add things stand, men are not equals in the dating game.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:07 AM
0

Each other
/r/MensRights01/10/17 05:00 AM
1

But we're equal? Right? Please tell me we're equal, bro.
/r/MensRights01/10/17 04:37 AM
9

As an exercise you could ask yourself whether one and only one partner in a gay relationship is routinely called "privileged" and whether he is prone to act instinctively on a strongly felt social obligation to place his own life in jeopardy to preserve and protect the other.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 07:10 PM
5

They can be strong, independent, and oppressed all at once. Look at that.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:26 PM
7

Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights28/09/17 11:05 PM
0

"We"? Who the fuck is "we"?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:18 PM
1

"What is your aim in Philosophy?” “To show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle” (Philosophical Investigations) – Wittgenstein
/r/MensRights28/09/17 10:17 PM
7

Exactly! I love it when you spot the details. 10 points to Mr Flappy Bird. And remember. This will be on the final.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:33 AM
3

So just some? Please edit your post to say "some feminisms do align with egalitarian ideas".
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:31 AM
6

Sexism is only about the oppression of women because it is about prejudice + power and only men have power because only women are the victims of sexism.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:26 AM
3

Feminism is many things. You need to do your research.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:21 AM
2

Spank you very much.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:19 AM
4

Feminists down the mines! Now!
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:17 AM
2

Bitch needs to research feminisms more herself. Has no fucking clue.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:16 AM
7

Feminism does align with egalitarian ideas. All feminisms or just some?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:15 AM
3

Which of the many feminisms did you have in mind?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 02:13 AM
3

And what "privilege" looks like. How ironic.
/r/MensRights24/09/17 06:59 PM
10

Feminists down the mines now!
/r/MensRights24/09/17 02:30 PM
1

K
/r/MensRights13/09/17 03:58 PM
2

Yes
/r/askTRP13/09/17 02:05 PM
1

What are your preferred pronouns?
/r/MensRights13/09/17 01:46 PM
-2

Yeah. I knew that was coming, but seriously...
/r/MensRights13/09/17 06:45 AM
-2

Have I ever been catcalled? No. I'm a man. Have you ever been catcalled?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 10:12 PM
0

Yes? What about my experience with catcalling?
/r/MensRights12/09/17 10:00 PM
1

Yes. That's why I always thought we should have used "androphobia" rather than "misandry".
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:55 PM
1

Oh well, excuse me.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:53 PM
1

Aren't you rather being the question with the phrase "verbal elder abuse"?
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:42 AM
1

I mean, obviously you're allowed to. Err..[not necessarily] (http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-08-18/only-cali-new-bill-would-imprison-healthcare-workers-using-incorrect-pronouns-patien)
/r/MensRights20/08/17 02:41 AM
2

Not ok.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 02:29 AM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 03:16 PM
2

Thanks. I certainly do my best.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:49 PM
2

Yes. Affirmative action oppresses the better qualified white candidate from a poor background. "Whites oppress blacks. Whites are oppressors. Oppression is bad. You are white. You ought to be ashamed of yourself" In this way blacks oppress whites. EDIT: But likewise, "blacks oppress whites by raping white women" was used to justify the lynch mobs.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 08:03 AM
0

What, Jews oppress Germans? But I'm also struck by how amongst the Jews Goyim oppress Jews.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 10:49 PM
1

Not really.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 10:04 PM
0

You're illustrating my point. Using the masculine pronoun in the absence of the person referred to to refer to a man who wears a skirt and now claims to be a woman is less protected than his wearing the skirt and claiming to be a woman. Viz: he doesn't get called a dick. Why not equally regard as harmless both expressions?
/r/MensRights13/08/17 02:39 PM
1

Why were they demon[it]ized™? What reason was given? Also, where is the list of demon[it]ized™ videos?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:36 AM
1

Lol. I can see why they've been demonitized. They're extremely good. Another channel to watch. Any others demon[it]ized?
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:19 AM
1

Irony is in the eye of the beholder.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:06 AM
1

Excellent! Let's do it.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:06 AM
1

Neither do I, but someone might say to a cross dresser, "stop being a jerk".
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:16 AM
1

What if Hilary is crooked? Doesn't that mean Hilary is the jerk? I speak hypothetically here.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:14 AM
1

Well, that's your view. But someone might say, "Hilary is crooked, so she deserves the moniker".
/r/MensRights12/08/17 05:13 AM
1

Again, I just heard trump call Hilary, "crooked Hilary". Was he being a jerk?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:41 PM
1

Contrariwise, is a man wearing a dress being a jerk?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:31 PM
1

No you are. Suppose I say, "a man with his dick cut off is still a man". Is that being a jerk?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:30 PM
1

Judge: I find you guilty of murder. Convict: Don't call me guilty Judge: Guilty
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:23 PM
0

Is deliberately calling someone something they've asked not to be called is a jerk thing to do?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:17 PM
1

I'm having difficulty knowing whether to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 09:16 PM
-1

You've misunderstood. That's not what I was saying
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:18 PM
1

You only weaken your case when you exaggerate.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:03 PM
1

You are framing your argument by means of just about the most unfavorable (to me) example you can think of. But what if you think of a more favourable example?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:43 PM
1

So, just to state your position clearly, for me to describe a man with his dick cut off as a man with his dick cut off constitutes "intentional antagonism"?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:05 PM
-3

I mean, obviously you're allowed to. It's kind of a jerk thing to do, but there's no law against acting like a jerk (yet). "Freedom to be a jerk" should be the 28th amendment. Compare this with: I mean, obviously you're allowed to wear women's clothes. It's kind of a jerk thing to do, but there's no law against acting like a jerk (yet). "Freedom to be a jerk" should be the 28th amendment. That's what I'm talking about.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:47 PM
1

I think people who get upset and offended are pussies that think their every whim must be catered to. 🤘
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:44 PM
1

And yet you wouldn't say, "You can wear women's clothes if you want, but if you end up with nothing but other assholes around you, don't come crying to us. I doubt you would though, assholes of your ilk tend to prefer hanging with other assholes".
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:40 PM
1

I don't accept that identity is self-determined. Its ontology is largely objective, and can no more be self-assigned at will as an adult, than it can be, in the overwhelming majority of cases, arbitrarily assigned at birth. But what really bothers me is that merely asserting this rather unremarkable claim gets me sent to the hall of the damned in a way that just bring rude never would.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 04:49 PM
5

"To suggest a group of our colleagues have traits that make them less biologically suited to that work is offensive and not O.K.” The tyranny of the not O.K.! Okay?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:08 PM
6

We are at a moment when mobs on the left and the right ignore evidence and destroy scapegoats. That’s when we need good leaders most.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:06 PM
1

'xactly!
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:31 PM
1

Let's get this shit Streisanded. Links to video channels?
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:13 PM
1

Seems to have something to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:00 PM
2

Maybe it's time we started an open source distributed network search engine. If we could leverage a little bit of the power of everyone's computer who signs up, we could spider the entire web, and then the only question would be good to fund the database that serves the results.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:56 PM
51

This is a woman judge. A woman sees straight through the games that other women play because she knows them so well.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:54 PM
8

Which just goes to show...all you've got to do is be yourself and treat women with respect. /s
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:20 AM
5

So you're going to leave a woman behind by killing yourself? See, this is the sort of thing that makes soccer moms the primary victims of male suicide. /S
/r/MensRights01/08/17 10:46 PM
1

Thank you for your concern.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:31 PM
3

I see this a lot. Can't we reverse it and do a website that purports to care about women but in reality is concerned only with how it affects men?
/r/MensRights31/07/17 05:22 PM
1

Interesting point that where there is sexism against women there is also sexism against men, but does that apply to slavery as well: where the slave is dependent on the master, the master is responsible for the slave?
/r/MensRights30/07/17 11:02 AM
4

If you're interested, you could make a thorough study of that and then start posting here. For my part, I would draw your attention to Warren Farrell's, "Why men are the way they are".
/r/MensRights28/07/17 07:08 PM
16

You have got a job. Now go out and get 9 more. One out of ten will treat you the way you like to be treated. Don't leave that one. This is the key to a happy work life. Believe me. I've tried it. It's simple arithmetic and self-respect.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/17 06:47 PM
4

Perhaps the sidebar would help?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 06:43 PM
1

"I love a woman with a good, big, fat ass", every time.
/r/askTRP28/07/17 04:59 PM
10

The important thing is to fuck her like a crazy dog.
/r/askTRP27/07/17 09:46 PM
15

This is not India, though they may hate men. This is the UK.
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:38 PM
3

No. They are the safest ones. They won't rape the children, obviously. Duh /s
/r/MensRights27/07/17 05:34 PM
1

Nail on head.
/r/MensRights18/07/17 05:16 PM
1

The proposal wasn't entirely serious.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:21 PM
4

If you notice the question was not whether gay pride was necessary. Interesting you see it as either or.
/r/MensRights16/07/17 08:19 PM
6

You shouldn't, unless you express your affection for women in disgusting ways. Damn! You mean I can't just rape them any chance I get? Now you tell me. /S
/r/MensRights16/07/17 07:55 PM
2

Wouldn't it be delicious to have a cis white contingent in the pride parade? Lol
/r/MensRights16/07/17 04:05 PM
1

So what exactly are you concerned about?
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:57 PM
3

The flaw with the feminist movement is that it attacks women and feminism. But hey, it's the internet. You can imagine whatever you want as long as it makes you feel better.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 05:54 PM
1

"You're so cool you look like horses" I'm sitting staring at this. Life is puzzling sometimes.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 11:50 AM
1

Watch this get deleted. Yes? I'm watching...
/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:56 PM
3

What was that wall of imagery supposed to show?
/r/MensRights08/07/17 08:26 PM
6

Biology makes women the prize. Alphas, by definition, are in the minority. It was ever thus.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/17 09:07 AM
1

"toll"?
/r/MensRights30/06/17 05:33 PM
3

That's a perfectly fair point, but still the claim is for equality.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:49 PM
2

Well, I didn't actually know much about her, but just looking at the declaration of sentiments I find, "He has made her morally, an irresponsible being, as she can commit many crimes with impunity, provided they be done in the presence of her husband. In the covenant of marriage, she is compelled to promise obedience to her husband, he becoming, to all intents and purposes, her master—the law giving him power to deprive her of her liberty, and to administer chastisement" That looks pretty libera…
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:38 PM
2

Except immediately one thinks of de Beauvoir, or liberal and even libertarian feminists. You may say it was always authoritarian in practice, but I'm theory it really was not, and all ideologies are capable of being construed as authoritarian in practice.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 08:36 PM
2

More fundamentally, it's potentially conservative and deeply authoritarian because of its anti-rationalism.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 06:50 PM
1

Well, you call him a social democrat. He calls himself a socialist.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:57 PM
0

Feminism has always been like what, exactly?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:25 PM
1

So pro-Bernie Sanders persons who question some aspects of feminism?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 01:24 PM
3

I'm a feminist. Always have been. That's why I'm against feminism.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:04 PM
2

So a denotation for "pro-Bernie Sanders males who question some aspects of feminism" used as a pejorative by feminists?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 12:03 PM
2

Are you trying to toll us? I hate it when these bastards start with their "pay to read" shit.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:54 AM
1

So the definiens I'm looking for is "pro Bernie Sanders MRA"?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:51 AM
1

"brocialist"? What new portmanteau is this?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:10 AM
7

This ^ is my kind of FEMINISM.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 11:02 AM
2

Makes you think about modern art, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:53 AM
13

Also, have you noticed how some women will treat their men with less consideration than they would show for a dog?
/r/MensRights29/06/17 10:01 AM
1

Well, we could certainly have a field day with this.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:56 AM
2

There must be more to this than the headline.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:55 AM
1

Personally, I don't go near lost children any more. PS. Not that I was ever a big lost children kind of guy in the first place.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:52 AM
1

But maybe they're not scary.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:51 AM
3

Same applies to modern art: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/modern-art-was-cia-weapon-1578808.html
/r/MensRights29/06/17 09:50 AM
1

Yep. I think you've just about got it.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:11 PM
1

Related to what?
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:10 PM
10

Oh please. Loosen up a bit.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:34 PM
2

Well, you see, it's pretty tangential, but the connection is that men's rights have been trying to get a contingent into the gay pride in various cities and have been rejected. Women's rights are in the parade, black rights are in the parade, but men don't have rights, for some reason, and likewise, neither do Jews. There must be a common thread here. But yeah. That was not obvious. I don't blame you for not getting it right off the bat.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:32 PM
1

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/519fWd56vTL._SX323_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:44 PM
2

One wonders whether this is a joke. Maybe not. The horror!
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:14 PM
5

Are you sure you're not just jealous?
/r/MensRights25/06/17 05:05 PM
44

Of course. I'm a feminist and have always been a feminist. That's why I'm so strongly against feminism.
/r/MensRights23/06/17 05:15 PM
1

Everything that trp claims to expose and tbp conceals.
/r/askTRP21/06/17 10:10 PM
3

Depends on what kind of female you'd like to be: one who believes in convenient lies, or one willing to acknowledge inconvenient truths.
/r/askTRP21/06/17 08:41 PM
1

Exactly. No issue here. Just as I suspected!
/r/MensRights21/06/17 08:26 PM
1

The thought is just mortifying.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:27 PM
2

I really think you've put your finger on the crucible of the matter.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 06:26 PM
1

I've no idea. I'm sure it's got nothing to do with false allegations in general.
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:37 PM
2

By George, I think you've got it!
/r/MensRights21/06/17 05:36 PM
1

What could this possibly have to do with men's rights? I can't imagine. /S
/r/MensRights21/06/17 04:35 PM
13

Totally illegal. This is direct discrimination under the 2010 Equality Act. Go to ACAS. http://m.acas.org.uk/index.aspx?articleid=1814 Sex discrimination The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate against employees because of their sex. Sex discrimination against men is just as unlawful as sex discrimination against women. Also, it is unlawful for a woman to discriminate against another woman because of her sex, and for a man to discriminate against another man becau…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:06 PM
2

There is no 'should' with alpha. Just 'does'. We are dealing with a zoological category from the standpoint of detached rational observation.
/r/askTRP18/06/17 06:50 AM
3

Because more primitive than feminism is the urge to protect women. And society expects men not to complain.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 06:46 AM
1

They didn't let her say anything about men.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 09:20 PM
11

Simply tell her it's biologically unfair that woman is less rational and physically weaker than man and that's why the two can never be equal. See how that works out.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 10:12 AM
3

Occasionally I drop little sarcobombs into feminist subs and they always get deliciously upvoted. The challenge is to lay the contradictions all but bare, and have them fail to notice.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 12:56 PM
1

What part of it is not obvious?
/r/askTRP15/06/17 06:33 PM
18

Despite what some posters are saying, this is far from the derisory image it appears. For too long women have been dominated, marginalised and oppressed in this society which reduces them to mere objects of desire for use by men. And how is male privilege preserved: violence. This woman has been violently assaulted while simply trying to enjoy a good night out with the girls. The trauma of this event is likely to leave the victim scarred for a long time to come. And what do the courts do? As usu…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 05:29 PM
2

She is They are most likely a language activist determined to promote the illusion of non-sexuality.
/r/askTRP15/06/17 04:36 PM
4

In a surprise ruling, a Canadian judge has declared that all men are guilty of everything, always, and no evidence is required.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:26 PM
1

This video appears to be fascist. Just look at the colours throughout: red, white and black. Just saying.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 09:43 AM
1

You're a fascist? An actual factory original?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/17 11:59 PM
2

Paywalled.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:22 PM
2

There is no 'd' in 'privilege'.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:20 PM
1

This is a great answer. Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/06/17 12:52 PM
2

Oh, I don't know; "instrument of the dark forces of the evil empire" has a certain ring to it.
/r/MensRights01/06/17 10:38 AM
3

Sounds like labelism to me. ;)
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:07 PM
1

Oh.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 07:33 PM
1

Exactly. That's the one I was thinking of too. But how can social text and all the pomo garbage journals have just continued uninterrupted after having their expertise revealed as such a fraud?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:28 PM
8

Yes. That sort of thing.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 04:25 PM
32

I think we should co-opt "evil bastards" ironically.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 12:22 PM
86

The tone of desperation in that message is truly telling.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 11:08 AM
2

http://image.wikifoundry.com/image/3/8ca9bcf092b67fff698dc04c1c0c4b4c/GW663H252
/r/MensRights31/05/17 10:14 AM
1

Worth thinking about that, isn't it. People actually get paid for writing complete madness and teaching it.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:40 AM
1

Ah. Key information. Well spotted.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:37 AM
1

Another?
/r/MensRights31/05/17 09:36 AM
1

Reminds of the Sokal hoax.
/r/MensRights31/05/17 02:41 AM
1

I mean. If his sister's friend were to fuck the brother would that be so bad? Funny how that works.
/r/askTRP30/05/17 02:50 PM
3

It's weird how traditions of family honor persist.
/r/askTRP30/05/17 08:10 AM
1

Why not? Does your sister have no say in the matter? Would you still be friends with your sister? EDIT: Guy said if it was his sister be wouldn't be friends with the guy any more, then deleted his post.
/r/askTRP30/05/17 07:21 AM
-1

Does his sister have no say in the matter?
/r/askTRP30/05/17 05:57 AM
1

Empty your pockets and hand over your money. ;-)~
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:56 PM
1

Your delicate prose style just a joy.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:49 PM
1

Maybe your problem is that I'm right.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:49 PM
1

Have you ever thought of just opening up and admitting you're a cunt?
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:48 PM
3

They're students. The can't help it. Think of leaves being blown around in an autumn breeze.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 06:02 PM
16

Well I think what this shows is the MRM is gaining in popular acceptance over the last three years. Outside of that it's pretty hilarious, but I laughed so much I couldn't finish it.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 10:14 AM
3

Interesting that this appears in a student paper, though I notice it's not being terribly well received.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 09:50 AM
-1

It's called speculation. It's also called circular reasoning. But perhaps that is one abstraction too far for a simpleton.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 08:59 AM
-2

If you can't address the point being made on its merits and you seek refuge instead in a tautological appeal to idle speculation, then you don't have a case, and nobody, MRA, feminist nor impartial observer, should be persuaded.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:42 AM
-2

Ok. Here's what I really think. You weaken your argument when you exaggerate. Nothing would please me more than evidence of disparity such as the title purpoted to provide. So I looked into it. The case would have been a glaring one and such evidence I could have taken out into the world in support of our cause. What happened? Well, it turns out the sentence given to the man was not really clearly reported. So I looked online for more information. None found. So I point out the problem here. I h…
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:40 AM
-1

Or maybe that was the insincere line in the other sub.
/r/MensRights27/05/17 12:13 AM
-2

So you don't really know what he got?
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:55 PM
1

No. It says up to 10.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:33 PM
5

They don't actually say what sentence the man got. Each count carries a penalty of up to 10 years, but that doesn't say what he got and whether they run concurrently.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 08:02 PM
1

I think of you examine this you will get some idea of why you were banned. https://imgoat.com/uploads/8f13708210/19107.PNG
/r/MensRights26/05/17 04:27 PM
1

Skip the chat and get straight down to business.
/r/askTRP26/05/17 11:33 AM
1

'Yes'.
/r/askTRP25/05/17 11:22 PM
9

younger women have rejected gender-equality feminism in favour of choice feminism. Choice feminism allows them "to invest heavily in their children, juggle work and family responsibilities, and maintain a sense of feminist self-respect." In other words, they believe in gender equality in the workplace, along with some form of gender specialization in the private sphere. Interesting distinction.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 08:25 PM
1

Very good fun.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 07:54 PM
3

Tell her you can't dick her without enthusiastic consent and make her bounce up and down on you.
/r/askTRP25/05/17 05:59 PM
1

So the world is toxic for men? I like it.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 05:02 PM
3

Women always and everywhere tend to keep men out. And people in general are inclined to dismiss questions that challenge their dominant assumptions.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 12:59 PM
5

This is not surprising.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 11:37 AM
1

If you say so. By people talking to each other. Not by fuckers like you "entertaining" so we won't talk to each other. Stop corporate media broadcasting crap and let peers entertain and educate themselves online.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 10:13 AM
1

Good idea.
/r/seduction25/05/17 10:13 AM
1

They come in great variety. They are powerful and adorable.
/r/askTRP25/05/17 10:09 AM
0

It means you are caught in an infinite regress.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 06:24 PM
0

Same.
/r/seduction24/05/17 05:42 PM
0

I know. That's why it's so girly.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 05:39 PM
5

You do whatever the fuck you want.
/r/seduction24/05/17 05:22 PM
2

The south.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 05:21 PM
4

Won't someone please think of the children.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 05:15 PM
1

...not giving a damn about bearing signs of masculinity.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 05:09 PM
0

Find a unicorn and be loved.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 04:31 PM
4

They like cock.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 03:37 PM
0

Bring back the glory days of Vienna.
/r/seduction24/05/17 03:18 PM
3

We don't need to know this.
/r/seduction24/05/17 03:17 PM
-3

I'm lost.
/r/seduction24/05/17 02:13 PM
-1

Take off your clothes. Every guy will be into you. This is not difficult.
/r/seduction24/05/17 02:13 PM
0

Remains hidden? In a surprise development I figured it out all on my own without being entertained by you.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 02:12 PM
1

I'm aiming to create an unbalanced programme Unbalanced? You mean your program will lack balance? All this "perspective" talk is nonsense. You can adopt any perspective you want. Men don't get a say in abortion. You can report that without anyone giving you their perspective. A man's sperm is his body too. The baby is made up of the sperm and the egg. The woman bears the child, but the child's body is not uniquely hers. Just report the facts. Our bodies ourselves only applies to women. Report al…
/r/MensRights24/05/17 01:43 PM
2

What do you think as a male?
/r/MensRights24/05/17 01:35 PM
7

Women get a raw deal on being born without a penis.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 01:32 PM
1

I don't have any masculine relationships.
/r/askTRP24/05/17 01:31 PM
1

Tits out.
/r/seduction24/05/17 10:48 AM
-3

Tits out.
/r/seduction24/05/17 10:47 AM
2

Ok. You go right ahead and call him or her out.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:45 AM
5

Let people be here for whatever reason they want.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 10:00 AM
15

If he's not interested, your job is to get him interested.
/r/seduction24/05/17 09:54 AM
3

I'm triggered, and may never recover.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 02:19 PM
3

Just tell her you want to fuck her cause you like her ass. How is this difficult? CLUE: She already knows.
/r/askTRP20/05/17 05:01 PM
1

Great idea. But why not just join the already existing group?
/r/askTRP18/05/17 09:46 AM
1

Thanks. Thought as much.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:16 PM
2

Where is this from?
/r/MensRights16/05/17 11:29 PM
1

So approach them, you fucker?
/r/askTRP13/05/17 08:42 PM
3

Ok. It's not just me then. Thanks.
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:03 PM
15

On a side note, what's so funny about a Subaru?
/r/MensRights13/05/17 03:09 PM
2

Your best course is tripartite: Throw him into the nearest large body of water. Stand guard on the edge in case he makes it back shore. Throw him in again if he does.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 01:22 PM
1

i dont care if shes seeing other guys and im seeing other girls. i dont want to LTR her and even tho i have a small soft-spot for her, i wouldnt give a shit if i never saw her again Bullshit!
/r/askTRP17/04/17 08:37 PM
5

Hello USU, and welcome to men's rights reddit. Now then, you say this violates article xii, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex. Can you see how some might think you are using this very article to discriminate on the basis of sex in this case?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:58 AM
1

It might be fun to try actually ORGANISING the protest. These little children can be blown around like leaves in the wind as long as it's Cool™. I love a bit of a jape, don't you? 😊
/r/MensRights12/04/17 07:54 AM
6

xii. Club funds may not be used for any activities that discriminate or harass on the basis of sex, race, age, marital status, sexuality, religion, or disability; or defame, coerce, intimidate or physically threaten an individual or group; ...and so they discriminate on the basis of sex. The footprints of Stalin are everywhere.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 02:58 AM
1

Yeah. I don't know about that. Maybe they do. I wonder what the thinking is behind that?
/r/MensRights12/04/17 01:15 AM
-6

I'm not sure there is a rape culture in Muslim societies, unless you include rape by a man of his wife, maybe. I don't think if you live in a Muslim society men can just go ahead and rape whoever they please. I'd say if you rape another man's wife you might get your head cut off. I do think Muslim populations tend to take a view of the fundamental nature of women very far removed from gender feminism, but that's not quite the same thing.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 04:59 PM
7

Well, your mother thinks women are wonderful and men ought to be ashamed of themselves. This in a world that thinks women are wonderful and men ought to be ashamed of themselves. This is called "feminism". You like to fuck women. Your mother thinks that's really yuck, and you ought to be ashamed of yourself even though, secretly, you know...she likes a bit of ramrod action as much as the next girl. Ooh! Feminism tells you your desires towards women are on a scale from "making her feel uncomforta…
/r/askTRP11/04/17 03:23 PM
6

Yes. But more than that, feminism is stopping you from outgrowing your mother.
/r/askTRP11/04/17 09:31 AM
7

"you're supposed to be life partners". Lol. I love it when you talk duty to me.
/r/MensRights11/04/17 09:29 AM
1

Browsing reddit and happened across this? Hmmmm. Sounds a bit intellectually dishonest. And I'm entitled, indeed obliged, to form a judgement of likelihood on this as all things. That's just honestly what i think.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 10:43 PM
3

I trust him more than you. Sorry. Also, why not take it up with him? I'm not all that interested. You haven't posted in mensrights before. What made you come here and comment on this one topic?
/r/MensRights06/04/17 09:19 AM
2

See my other comment in reply to this.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 04:49 AM
6

Then why don't you take it up with /u/ZeusVince ? Is this a joke? Women are the number 1 victims of islam. " لا خير في امة حكمتها امرأة " " there is no good in a nation that is ruled by a woman " Women are not allowed to lead. Ayesha that is claimed to be the most powerful woman of islam back in its early stages was not a leader. Women are not allowed to choose what they wear. يقول - تعالى ذكره - لنبيه محمد - صلى الله عليه وسلم - : يا أيها النبي قل لأزواجك وبناتك ونساء المؤمنين : لا يتشبهن بالإم…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 05:34 PM
2

From someone who was a Muslim until age 15. Where do you get yours?
/r/MensRights05/04/17 03:43 PM
4

So it turns out that feminism is what: all about protecting women from male desire and preserving their privileges under the patriarchy, and nothing whatsoever to do with equal rights for women? How foolish of me to think otherwise.
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:32 AM
9

...or that there is no good in a nation that is ruled by women, or that women are not allowed to choose what they wear, or that wives and daughters must be covered to distinguish them from slaves, or that women cannot work if their husbands or family can support them, or that women must stay at home, or that women can inherit only half of what men inherit, or that if a wife refuses her husband in bed he can beat her and the angels will curse her until the sun rises, or that polygamy is perfectly…
/r/MensRights05/04/17 10:18 AM
3

That was a very good read. Tad pompous and traditionalist in tone, but comprehensively covered all the bases mentioned here and sparkled with moments of great insight. There are many little details to quibble over, and a rather vague, unsupported handwaving style of argument, i thought, but the points he was arguing for were good ones and many things were boldly said that ring true and that i haven't heard quite put like that before. That said, in his conclusion he took off at something of a wil…
/r/MensRights01/04/17 10:14 PM
1

Pardon my ignorance. Does Google own Twitter now?
/r/MensRights25/03/17 02:08 PM
-2

Tell her, "That's fine; I can just fuck you and fuck off".
/r/seduction25/03/17 03:42 AM
2

Oh no. The sky will fall on Calgary. /s
/r/MensRights25/03/17 03:14 AM
1

I didn't realise I was belittling those who are trying to do something about it. Are you absolutely sure about that?
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:10 PM
1

Number systems are ways of representing quantities. What is represented does not change depending on how it is represented
/r/seduction10/03/17 04:22 AM
2

WINGMAN REQUIRED. Must be experienced. Fluency in vigesimal positional notation desirable but not essential.
/r/seduction09/03/17 09:07 AM
15

Ah! Ternary!
/r/seduction08/03/17 08:32 PM
4

Sigh. Do you actually know what's the binary number system is?
/r/seduction08/03/17 07:16 PM
22

Could be binary. "10" in binary is written "2" in decimal. "10" in decimal is written "1010" in binary. I'm not sure what difference the number system makes. The quantity represented remains unchanged. Perhaps he meant "use a single binary digit"? On the other hand, maybe he means 0 for boy, 1 for girl.
/r/seduction08/03/17 05:38 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:01 PM
2

Don't get mad, get even. Look at the list of deprecated words and quietly insist on using them. 'Man,' for instance. They've proscribed 'man'.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 07:42 PM
1

What are the main points outlined here?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:50 PM
26

The bestI found on this is from Matthew Collins on a comment to an article in Spiked. Unfortunately, I can't link directly to the comment since it's on disqus. "It's quite simple. If there's sexual liberation then that means sexual liberation for all. That includes for the lower-status males, who get to flirt and come on to potential partners, or take pleasure in seeing a sexy woman be sexy. Unfortunately, many women can't accept this, because only certain males are considered worthy mates by fe…
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:04 PM
13

I see nothing in the article about white ribbon pledges.
/r/MensRights07/03/17 12:49 PM
9

Matthew Collins his the mail on the head. "It's quite simple. If there's sexual liberation then that means sexual liberation for all. That includes for the lower-status males, who get to flirt and come on to potential partners, or take pleasure in seeing a sexy woman be sexy. Unfortunately, many women can't accept this, because only certain males are considered worthy mates by females, and sexuality from the "wrong" males is and always has been demonized and feared. Many women -- at least those …
/r/MensRights07/03/17 01:46 AM
1

Yes. They look like Stalinists. Most likely they are taking orders straight from the central committee. It's just ridiculous. They are capable of thinking for themselves, but value the pat on the head from their grüpenfuhrer more than their own thoughts.
/r/MensRights01/03/17 01:15 AM
3

Yeah. Why is this that? How do real rapists remain under the radar?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 09:50 AM
1

Which link?
/r/MensRights28/02/17 08:47 AM
1

Which video?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 11:07 PM
1

Yeah, I know, but I think it predates feminism. It probably goes back at least far as the advent of Christianity. I mean I'm thinking of Freud's Civilisation and its discontents. Some degree of repression is just an integral element of Civilisation.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 05:43 PM
1

Ooh, baby, baby, baby. You got me.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 03:39 PM
3

I certainly do my best. ;)
/r/MensRights27/02/17 09:49 AM
2

I've no idea, but they say lasting long is a sign of virility. Have you tried waiting to see how long you can hold on?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 08:53 AM
1

I know what you mean, but it's kinda true, isn't it? I could fuck a duck most of the time.
/r/MensRights27/02/17 08:52 AM
1

What supports feminism. I didn't notice?
/r/MensRights27/02/17 08:51 AM
1

Excellent! Thanks for posting.
/r/seduction26/02/17 11:57 PM
7

Men aren't objectified, they're subjectified. They are turned into nothing more than agentive subjects of pernicious sexual desire and providers of money and protection for women. Nobody cares about being sexually desired, and that isn't a problem for men, except perhaps on the margins.
/r/MensRights25/02/17 04:58 PM
1

Yes. Literally means, well, literally, you know, what is written. You wrote something else. Buddy, just copy and paste and you'll be out of trouble. Sigh. Why do you feel the need to write something else, attribute it to him, and say it's not something else? That's just...A pity. I can't really respond. Sorry. I know you'll hate me now.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:31 PM
1

I don't think "literally" means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:14 PM
3

I consider myself an MRA and I'm with you 100% on this.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 06:02 PM
3

Are you really not sure? Not sure at all? Like, no idea?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:57 PM
9

Your comment reminds me of that unforgettable case on that awful judge Judy show where one of the litigants is proud of how she beat her husband. Have you seen it?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:55 PM
9

Normally not a fan of yours, but that's a good comment.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:52 PM
2

Yes, obviously. I can't see how this would be any kind of feminist or men's rights issue. /s
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:46 PM
1

I think it is absurd to say that in many or most cases of a 13 year old boy with a 20s+ teacher, that the boy is the "predator". Did he say this? Did he really? I mean really? I'm disappointed. I was really interested in getting a response, but if you have to exaggerate what he said, you can't have much of a case. That's a pity.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 05:23 PM
14

Ah! A fellow feeling with a taste for irony. It's you and me buddy. I'll make the coffee.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:37 PM
3

Hah! Researching the obvious. Nice work if you can get it.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:29 PM
13

Let me guess. It's ally fogg, so it's all because of "toxic" masculinity. Yep. To save time I started at the end. But the problems go deeper. There is the insidious influence of macho conditioning that beseeches to "man up" and demands that "boys don't cry" on pain of mockery and humiliation.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 01:02 PM
34

No. He's controlling you. EDIT: umm, it was a joke. Is humor not allowed?
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:58 PM
2

"Jack, it's great to see you".
/r/MensRights24/02/17 12:52 PM
1

Thanks for your comment. I gather you think what Milo said is abhorrent. I, on the other hand, think it may be true. Do you think it's abhorrent because it's false, or for some other reason? Perhaps, if I thought it false, I too would find it abhorrent. But what if it's true? Wouldn't it then no longer be abhorrent? Calling it "abhorrent" seems to beg the question. In any event, that a youngster is constitutionally incapable of wanting sex with a teacher seems just empirically false. I guess the…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:31 AM
1

Yes. The default assumption now is that a man will be harbouring instinctive paedophiliac tenancies, conflating paedophilia (prepbescent) with ephebophilia (postpubescent), unless they can prove their bona fides by bearing the love of a woman or, oddly, being openly gay. Furthermore, there is a view that paedophiles can be spotted by their lead appearance, and that paedophilia is worse than murder. This is like an extension of the idea that all men are rapists.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 01:35 PM
3

I'd just like to leave this incipient thought here. Surely there is a correlation between groping without consent and provoking desire without consent. More and more, I'm thinking this is the elephant in this particular room. Sooner or later, won't we need to grasp this nettle by the straw? Sorry if this is a little off at a tangent.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 12:16 PM
1

Yes. That's the sort of thing, but I'm thinking more precisely in this way. It is in the woman's nature to please powerful men. When she pleases them, it is understood they will provide for and protect her. But if she chooses to do that, where does agency lie? I could go on. I could write a book on it.
/r/MensRights23/02/17 11:36 AM
5

More than that, it's at the very Nexus of the problem. See, this is called, umm, iirc, sexual harassment. Seriously. The woman was hit on with a promise of a reward. Text book workplace harassment. But now, it turns out there's another angle. Women using their bodies to get ahead with the boss. If there's a pun in there, I'm taking the credit. There's a name for this too. I'm damned if I can remember. Oh yes. Whoring. It's coming back to me now.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 08:30 PM
5

Thanks for your concern.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 07:37 PM
3

Ask her to marry you.
/r/seduction21/02/17 06:47 PM
162

If you criticize women, it's called "misogyny". If you criticize men, it's called "feminism".
/r/MensRights20/02/17 04:43 PM
1

...or a terrorist.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 10:11 PM
1

I didn't know about it.
/r/MensRights18/02/17 12:01 AM
591

Men are sent to jail if they have babies and can't afford to pay for them and their mothers. Women, on the other hand, are given benefits and housing. This is a mark of the continued patriarchal expectations of men's duty to provide and of women as properly belonging in the home looking after babies. Feminism, all around the world, faces gnarled and mouths spitting fire, is railing against this instance of the patriarchy, leaving legislators quaking in their boots. Destroy the patriarchy. Destro…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 08:02 AM
0

You just don't get analogies, do you? Here's a clue: they only go so far.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 11:41 AM
-1

Oh go on. Stop being such a pigfuck.
/r/MensRights09/02/17 11:04 AM
1

But, you know, the British did get out of India.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 11:35 PM
1

Not really.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 12:45 PM
20

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." - Mahatma Gandhi
/r/MensRights07/02/17 11:34 PM
1

I've been driven to it.
/r/askTRP30/01/17 08:58 PM
3

I really think they just don't care. They think they they are INTRINSICALLY MORALLY SUPERIOR to the rest of mankind and only they can save us. And dissent is vile and must be crushed as a bourgeois deviation.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 07:40 PM
4

You are a vile man who likes women. Be ashamed. You are a pervert. You were single because you are a misogynist. You got everything you deserved. It would be better if you just died. Stop being a man and you'll be fine. Otherwise, be gay. That's ok. Your new girlfriend is a mere child incapable of making choices for herself. You will leave her scarred for life. You don't care about her. You only want to satisfy your vile sexual desire. Women are strong and independent and don't need you any more…
/r/askTRP30/01/17 06:32 PM
5

There is the usual great irony here and the haunting figure of the ever-genial Joseph Stalin. As for me, I will never submit to unfreedom in the quest for freedom even if it means we remain deprived of our political goal to the end of time. A pox on the vile perverts who transform a doctrine of liberation into a tyrant's charter!
/r/MensRights30/01/17 06:20 PM
1

Here's another interesting case for you, somewhat redolent of yours: https://www.youtube.com/shared?ci=u8DNteqAk6A
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:32 PM
1

Because everyone hates men. This is why it's such a perfect case study in misandry.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:10 PM
2

I know you said she got arrested. It remains to be seen whether she is even charged, still less tried, convicted, and sentenced as a sex offender. Only then will she become a sex offender. There is a strong body of evidence women are treated more leniently by the criminal justice system. Personally, as a feminist, I support both women and men's rights to be free from assault. I think it's outrageous that she assaulted you with a weapon. However, as a feminist, I also think women do not benefit f…
/r/MensRights28/01/17 03:59 PM
1

So we must draw our own conclusions.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 03:25 PM
1

If you don't like a story being posted on the internet, don't post your story on the internet. Thanks sillymod. Beautifully put.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 12:26 PM
1

The edit reveals your real motive. Just as I suspected, you are anti-rights.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 04:26 AM
1

Somehow you've managed to turn it into women being oppressed by oppressive male story. Are you completely blind to the obvious. In the story, if it had been a woman being sexually assaulted by a man, the outrage would have been huge and the story would obviously belong in the public domain as a women's rights issue. You have spectacular demonstrated the double standard this is all about.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 03:03 AM
3

Yes. Your obsession with this non issue is spectacular.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:52 AM
1

Lol.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:51 AM
1

Err, except it would be the publisher that owns any doubtful copyright. I believe the publisher of reddit is Condé Nast. So they would have to sue themselves for republishing their own content on their own website. Interesting that you are making such a big fuss about this. What a spectacle!
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:49 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:44 AM
1

Another excellent question.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:40 AM
2

Good question.
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:38 AM
1

That's not quite correct. Do you know what happened? For example, where did I ask? Look for the quote. And what response did I get. Did he say no? Look for the quote. If you actually read what happened, you'll know. I didn't ask. Ever. I think you might find it instructive to check the facts without making assumptions. Who is the douche here?
/r/MensRights28/01/17 02:26 AM
1

Woosh. I have a very subtle sense of humor. You people really are hilarious.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 11:18 PM
5

What are you even doing here if you don't care about rights?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:50 AM
10

Right not to be sexually assaulted at work, yet. Right to control what happens to his post the public internet, no. Nice elision there.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:49 AM
10

Go ahead and link. I would if I could. I'll copy you're link into the OP. And I'm entitled to copy it here. I don't need his permission. He was sexually assaulted at work. That a story. Another is that you don't think we have a right to care about people's rights not to be sexually assaulted at work. What are you even doing here?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:48 AM
6

I removed it because you kept whining it wasn't word right.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:45 AM
1

Nobody really cares what username it happened to except your random band of vote warriors. The point is it happened and it shouldn't have done.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:39 AM
2

...and you refused, and he got downvoted over 30 times for suggesting you post it here, because people don't have rights, evidently.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:36 AM
0

Make sure you get a copy of the police report. If the pepper spray caused you to need medical attention and/or ruined your clothes, you deserve that money back. Upvoted!
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:35 AM
1

Umm, yes I can. Just watch me. Bitch.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:34 AM
2

It's pretty funny though, because it reads that way, and you are acting like one now with regards to claiming belated copyright over your post, ridiculously. On top of that, the implication of you complaining about being sexually assaulted if you have no right to be free from sexual assault is that you are an entitled bitch. I think that's why it reads that way. But all that irony would be too much for you. Back to sleep, pumpkin. On another note, this really is hysterically funny. What a deligh…
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:30 AM
2

Well that's interesting. What about your dad? Are you telling porkies? How can we be sure. Maybe I'm your mother. On the salient points, I notice you don't deny you were sexually assaulted at work. We who care are people's rights are entitled to care about that even if you don't, except when you do. You may not like it, but you're a man and you have rights. You have the right not to be sexually assaulted at work, but not to control what happens to your posts in the internet. Welcome to reality. …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 07:17 AM
2

You have been sexually assaulted at work. That bothers you a lot, except when rights groups take and interest. Then you're all, like, go ahead, molest me any time. I don't want to be associated with those people who think I have a right to be free from sexual assault at work. Have you called your mother recently, hypocrite? How would it be if it was a woman who was assaulted. Oh, and, you'll find the internet is a public institution. And even we men are equal members of the public. And no, some …
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:45 AM
2

Did you just call yourself an entitled bitch?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:37 AM
1

You don't get to choose, you conceited fuck. You put it on the internet.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 06:10 AM
1

My crusade? So you're another snotty anti rights fuck. Fuck off. It either happened or it didn't. I can post whatever I want.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:54 AM
1

Steal? I posted some text. I'm not allowed to link to other subs. It happened. The dick got all snotty about being asked to repost. Wtf?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:32 AM
1

I ASKED YOU TO REPOST IT ASSHOLE. YOU DIDN'T WANT TO. WHO THE FUCK CASES WHAT USERNAME ITS ATTACHED TO?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 05:30 AM
2

"I hate Milo" is not hate speech. Translation: "hate speech" = "hating the wrong thing speech".
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:52 AM
1

Can you tell me what this is about?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:50 AM
2

Because only oppressed minorities are allowed to dissent, and we(feminists) get to say who they are.
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:48 AM
2

No, you don't understand. Let's put it like this. Quoting French emperor Napoleon, "All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others". It's a matter of hierarchy and status. Heaven forbid! Did someone say "privilege"?
/r/MensRights26/01/17 02:45 AM
1

Exactly. Well spotted. I was just testing. But the imperative to understand others does not entail the requirement to be defenceless in the face of mindless insults. You called me a mangina cuck. To waste any further time reasoning with you would be shameless. I've things to do. Fuck off some more.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 06:40 PM
1

You sound like a cunt. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:33 PM
2

Dismisses? How so? Understates it, perhaps.
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:06 PM
1

No of course not. That will just make you a nice guy™ who thinks he is entitled to sex in exchange for being nice. You have to be a total bastard. Have you learned nothing?
/r/askTRP24/01/17 03:58 PM
3

I really don't think it's that simple. They want to get laid, yes. But they want to be valued for who they are, just like you do. They want to help create a world in which that can happen: a world in which women are treated as the equals of men so that men and women can find true happiness without constantly having to pretend they are somebody else and without the man having to perform as the big guy that dominates the women to win them as prizes. Not a bad idea, huh? So do they want to get laid…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:37 AM
3

Lazy labeling of others assigned outside the group is the enemy of understanding. If it were so simple, why would there be such persons. Plainly they have reasons for what they did and they too, just like us, believe that their understanding is correct and if followed by all would make for a fairer and better life for all of us. They may be mistaken, but we should start by understanding them. Then we could perhaps help them out others to begin to see the place where their reasoning went astray. …
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:35 PM
8

Virtue signaling certainly. Beta? That's a bit of a second rate term. What does it even mean? In fact, virtue signaling, rightly or wrongly, is a way into political power, and it that sense it is a trait of power, and, if power is alpha (I'm not sure), then it might just as well be an alpha trait. Better would be to think clearly, ditch the term, and say what we think really would consist in virtue if this does not.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 05:30 PM
3

Ok. At last a comment that shows signs of understanding. There are several points to make here concerning the industry as a whole, the Scott trust and the BBC. I'll take them in turn. ONE. The industry as a whole ...is facing a crisis. The internet has caused a sharp fall in sales revenue and internet advertising is not shaping up to expectations. The biggest part of sales revenue has always been from advertising, not the cover price. Local news has almost collapsed. The internet has robbed it o…
/r/MensRights17/01/17 12:35 PM
3

Yeah. Don't know whether serious or some kind of set up but basically, yeah, he got voted in after being revealed as a pussy grabber by his own voice. The scandal would be if he hadn't done something like this. Of course, previous administrations only committed crimes against peace in launching unprovoked wars amounting to criminal mass-murder in places like Iraq, but, you know, fuck those details. Who the fuck cares about brown foreigners who don't understand our lies, power craving, and parano…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/17 09:59 PM
3

Would you care to expand on your potentially quite interesting point? Don't make any assumptions about your reader's knowledge. Lay it all on the table. Things are rarely as obvious as you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 07:03 PM
1

TRP isn't a part of MR. Careful now. Don't break their balls. That would be a security violation. Safety is everything, remember? Every scribbling little thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:51 PM
2

Bookmarks? Outrage? Yes ma'am
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:48 PM
4

In a surprise development, researchers have discovered that college is the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:33 PM
2

Have you considered just stating what the link is supposed to demonstrate?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 06:13 PM
1

Sources! You're looking for sources? Party pooper! /s
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:47 PM
1

Say, do you think maybe people just DON'T LIKE men's rights proponents?
/r/MensRights15/01/17 05:41 PM
2

Not necessarily, but I'm glad you enjoyed yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 05:35 PM
2

What don't you understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 05:35 PM
2

Exactly. Well spotted. Why do so few people notice this. TRP is men trying to please women. Why? Because feminism left men no choice. Remember when women used to try to discuss how to please men and obsess over their outward appearance. Of course, all that's changed now. Wait...? But why, then, do feminists hate TRP? Or do they?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 05:14 PM
1

Dude. You need to turn your gaze by one right angle. No longer cross sectional. Now longitudinal. Take a look at history. And no. I won't tell you. That would be too easy. I prefer to teach by leaving it as an exercise. Just ask yourself what has changed in the last, say, 100 years. Are there any institutions which govern socio-sexual relations that have changed? You're a smart kid. I have every confidence in you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 05:09 PM
2

Why? What have you done?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:58 PM
3

Out in the real world people go about their business as usual, most guys and girls are chilled and are getting laid, getting into relationships, whatever. So you really think feminism has changed nothing for these people? You don't have to be aware of the ideas to be affected by them. Or, to be more precise, you don't have to be aware of the debate to be affected by its outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:51 PM
4

Refreshing honesty at last. Will someone explain to me what drug I need to take I'm order to develop the impressive ability some people appear too have to genuinely not notice this, to me, very obvious fact? Would living under a rock help?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:23 PM
9

Have you forgotten "a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle". Why would "a man needs a woman like a lion needs a writing desk surprise you". All men are rapists is a giant shit test. Feminism is a shit test. Women are full of shit. They've been treating men like shit since supposedly getting liberating.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:21 PM
2

You don't recall? Have you called your mother recently?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:18 PM
15

Not true. These ideas, feminism in its various guises and the new anti-feminism, profoundly shape the social relations between men and women and the institutions that regulate them. This in turn creates much of our everyday experience of love, sex, relationships and reproduction. These are immeasurably important to our health and happiness. They are the very stuff of life. People have and will always care about them immensely. EDIT I've been banned because of the following comment: Ouch! You got…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:15 PM
7

Because society hates men. It's called "misandry". It's as old as the hills. Don't be deceived my the feminist™ propaganda. They talk about misogyny. There is no such thing. Everybody loves women. Men love to fuck, own and protect them. Women love to be fucked, owned and protected . Men vy with one another for ownership status. Feminism changed things a bit. It rejected the system of ownership, calling it "patriarcy" and "oppression". They are right it is. But that was fixed. Feminism™ came to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/17 04:08 PM
10

"Embrace the true man you are"? Surely you don't mean "just be yourself"?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/17 01:22 PM
11

Thanks mom.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:00 AM
3

The risk rape culture propagandists take with this is that they may win the argument but lost the debate. If we concede that this is rape, quickly the conclusion will follow that rape comes in a variety of types and not all rape is terribly serious. "Well, you know, there are worse things than rape; deal with it". Shocking.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 06:48 PM
1

It's inciting a crime. Hmmm... Also, if the guy gets away with it (especially if he perceives the woman to enjoy it) he may think it is an acceptable thing to do and end up raping other women who do not have the same view. This second reason is interesting. Alternatively, if he recognizes it as wrong it could cause serious mental issues (as in his mind he would have committed a heinous crime). So basically, by rape-baiting, she could be putting others at risk. Doubtful. The second reason is most…
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:10 PM
1

Why is rape baiting never justified? I'm not disagreeing with you, I just want to know the moral reasoning. Does it do any harm? Yes, if it is followed by a report of rape condemning the man. But suppose it isn't? Then what harm is there? Assuming it causes no harm, what other basis is there for condemning it? There may be such basis. I don't know.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:35 AM
1

I still can't see the comic value in this perfectly reasonable question, as it seems to me.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 11:30 AM
1

Can you tell me which line was supposed to contain comic value? I completely missed it?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:59 AM
2

The point about this piece of art is that it represents conduct which we took to be both normal and worthy of admiration and approval back then.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:42 AM
2

The analogy need only go as far as the grabbing and kissing.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:39 AM
2

Sexual norms have been in flux. You don't say. My how times change!
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:38 AM
1

You previously conceded that some women may go out to actively seek getting raped, though you said they would be unlikely to report it as rape, with which I agree. I also agree that it would still technically be rape as long as the man doesn't know she wants it, and how could he ever be sure, without the moment being spoiled for the "victim". Paradox abounds here. So, do tell; is seeking to be raped (rape baiting) ever justified, assuming it happens?
/r/MensRights12/01/17 12:36 AM
5

Rape is never justified except when a woman wants it.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 08:24 PM
1

Just in case it needs to be said, rape is never justified.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:29 PM
1

Just in case it needs to be said, rape is never justified.
/r/MensRights11/01/17 06:27 PM
1

Just speaking for myself, I'd say you're right, but I'd cross that bridge when I come to it. Hi sweetie thanks for the soup. No, actually. You can't order me around like a child. Alright then. Fine, I'll just get Belinda, Betty or Bev to bring the soup next time. See if I care. Have a nice life.
/r/askTRP05/01/17 01:35 PM
1

For a chronic illness, sure, but for an acute illness like a cold in a young man I'm the middle of winter? I really think that would be ridiculous.
/r/askTRP05/01/17 01:31 PM
2

No. Just tell the bitch you've got a cold, ffs. What is the problem? If you don't want soup, tell get to fuck off.
/r/askTRP04/01/17 11:25 PM
1

Thanks. Taking a look now. And what about women actually going out seeking to get raped? Do you believe that actually happens? And wouldn't that present more than a small problem for feminist thinking in rape? Surely heterosexual men don't? Things don't seem to be capable of being construed symmetrically.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:54 PM
1

Do you have evidence it's a fantasy for men? Has anyone researched this. Do publishers make big bucks out of selling swept-off-their feet fantasies to men? But more than just fantasies, so far as I can tell, some women actually go out seeking and hoping to be raped; they call it rape baiting. I really can't think men would do this. Maybe in the gay world, but certainly not in the straight one. No. I'm afraid symmetry doesn't work here. It would be nice, but as with do much else to do with sex, i…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:58 PM
1

Oh, I see. It's just an estimate? Ok. Fair enough.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 09:25 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 08:59 PM
2

These tweets could be construed as not entirely serious, but I'm starting to think there may be a serious issue behind this, because, although I have never really understood these things, there are some women who, for whatever reason, like the idea and even the actuality of being raped and will go looking for it. Where did this come from? Why? It begins to explain a few things with regard to the problems feminism has been having in policing rape culture. Why the difficulty getting women to repor…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 12:14 PM
2

Relationship things are MRA things. What is it feminists used to say? "The personal ifs political". That's true and it cuts both ways. Feminism and the MRM are concerned with the broad social relationship between men and women and part of that manifests on a personal level in relationships.
/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:58 PM
3

She didn't say ending all contact is simply unacceptable. Is there some reason you felt the need to misrepresent her? Did you think, perhaps, dealing head on with the rather more subtle point she was making would be too hard?
/r/MensRights02/01/17 07:56 PM
1

I had the album. Found the lyrics occasionally obscure.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 01:46 PM
18

Wow. Wait a minute. That's Pink Floyd. Now, at last, I get those words. I'm having a little epiphany here.
/r/TheRedPill31/12/16 01:42 AM
1

Doormat is an interesting metaphor. No room for negotiation?
/r/askTRP30/12/16 05:44 PM
17

No, no, no. Too needy. Our boy did well in the field in this example. Key term: IDGAF. The world needs more like him.
/r/askTRP30/12/16 12:44 PM
2

So, umm, is this some kind of dishonor? "Yeah baby, I fucked her like a duck, would you like a go?", would seem like a plausible way forward. You've always got too play these things to your advantage.
/r/seduction30/12/16 11:47 AM
1

So it's ppd, not rp, but, you know, details, details. (Throws hands in air) Just sit where you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 04:30 AM
0

So you can't say rp says this but you'll just make it up anyway because accuracy who cares.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 03:09 AM
1

We are. But evidently it's still a question. People really did and some still do believe that all reality is constituted by representation. There is nothing outside the text
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 01:11 AM
1

It's obvious when you put the question aright. That was my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 01:04 AM
1

Well, that was the question asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:56 AM
3

She is a narcissist.
/r/askTRP29/12/16 12:20 AM
2

But if, as a woman condemned, you hold such standards yourself, then you will find the pill bitter. No, I think most women do not see dating attractive men, "friendzoning", or divorce as immoral. Oh I see. You feel the need to be disingenuous here. I must be on to something. Gotcha!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:05 AM
0

they go around lamenting how hypergamy is destroying society, how women are responsible for the fall of civilization, No they don't. You're hyperventilating. Please try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/16 12:03 AM
5

I'm not sure. Does rp really hold women to high moral standards? It condemns them four falling short of them. Sure. But then it often says that's ok. It's just their nature. I really don't think rp is big into holding moral standards. That's it's weakness. But if, as a woman condemned, you hold such standards yourself, then you will find the pill bitter. So either shape up to your own standards, and condemn women who don't, or ship out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 09:37 PM
2

One day it will be obvious this question is tantamount to Could she get to be beauty queen by falsely imagining she is more beautiful?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 09:27 PM
1

British man has therapy to get better game. Becomes Chad. Is he hotter? This has really touched me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/16 09:24 PM
1

No.
/r/askTRP28/12/16 11:30 AM
5

"Another time" = no thanks.
/r/askTRP28/12/16 10:52 AM
3

No. We live in a phallocentric world. Did you not get the memo? /s
/r/MensRights28/12/16 07:52 AM
2

Maybe you're just jealous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/16 11:00 PM
1

Waiting for UPDATE next decade...
/r/askTRP25/12/16 06:32 PM
1

Joking? Me? Phwa...
/r/askTRP25/12/16 08:33 AM
3

Dude, this girl is exploiting your deep atavistic desires for her own perverted sexual gratification. Now her parents are trying to leverage it into a situation of duration lasting a lifetime of servitude. Making it out alive is more of an accomplishment than you think. This has nothing to do with the law in the state of Utah.
/r/askTRP25/12/16 08:32 AM
-3

Best to just tell them that your interest in her is purely carnal, even if that's not true. If they can't accept your refreshing honesty, then you could try making them feel ashamed of themselves for what they are trying to do to you. That should confuse them long enough for you to make it out alive.
/r/askTRP25/12/16 06:47 AM
1

The glaring contradiction which you can't see.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 11:52 PM
1

Yoo short. You have zero self-awareness. You are truly impressive. Upvoted!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 11:10 PM
1

Life is too short for this. Don't you even read what you wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 11:09 PM
3

This is just the false symmetry I'm talking about, characterized by the spurious use of the third person plural prounoun to elide the distinction between he and she and pretend that biology does the same. No. It doesn't. Stop it. You're being silly. And I think you know it. This ship of yours is sinking fast. Have you just decided to go down with it?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 06:01 PM
1

Thanks. I thought it might get slammed. I was just trying to say something I was thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/16 05:52 PM
9

Symmetry is implied by the idea of equality, but is undermined by our biology. Nature endows women with sexual power. Feminism preserves the illusion of symmetry in order to deny the existence of that power. Less attractive men lose out, but feminism prevents them from attributing this to the vagaries of fortune. Instead they rationalise it as a lack of virtue. There is something needlessly cruel about this. Biology herself may be cruel, but feminism has destroyed the traditional institutions th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/16 09:59 PM
3

This is an example of a bad argument fir a good conclusion. To be strictly logical about it, moral responsibility only exists in the domain of freedom to act or influence the actions of others. Think about that for a second. Furthermore, or moral standards should not be based on the worst possible example of the type of issue we are talking about as a point of comparison.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/16 01:34 PM
3

Baby, baby, baby, you've hit the nail on the head; and that nail sure needs hitting.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 01:13 PM
0

Sorry. No pig-fapping allowed.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 11:11 AM
0

Yes you have, and you will again, pigman.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 01:29 AM
1

Thank you ras. I have no doubt I excel at all that jazz.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:15 PM
1

David, Great beginning. It's always good to start with a clear and unequivocal statement of your position. For extra marks, consider bulking out your essay by saying more about feminism, as you define it, and what it is about it that is toxic to men, again, under your definition of "toxic", a term you might like to critically evaluate. In addition, it may be useful to demonstrate an understanding of those feminists who would take the opposite view, and explain why you think they are mistaken. De…
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:14 PM
11

Happy Christmas, everyone
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:43 PM
1

Well spotted! Upvoted!
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:38 PM
0

No. But yours is peculiarly suited to its owner.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:46 PM
1

Yes. I'll link to it if I can find it.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:42 PM
1

29 points for "shibboleths". I like "shibboleths". But rather too many "to be honest". Much has been achieved but more work needs to be done. /s
/r/MensRights22/12/16 12:16 PM
0

The left does not oppose free speech. It supports free speech, except when what someone says is not OK. /s But what does the free market do? It maximises profits with cold, inelluctable logic. Anything else is just shat upon with force. If reddit does not accept the alt right it will be utterly smashed in the market place and become a quiet, fetid backwater for the ill-at-ease.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:48 AM
1

No we won't. Already the world is waking up to find that smug liberal establishment feminism and its PC shiboleths have been deleted. Shift Alt Delete Expect a few background processes running on a low priority. And stop being so pessimistic.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:44 AM
0

Can someone explain the difference between reddit admin and mods? Surely our own mods would not have removed this. It makes no sense.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:40 AM
2

Can't you just change the gender of the modifier?
/r/askTRP20/12/16 06:40 PM
2

Does your mother know you're on the computer?
/r/askTRP20/12/16 11:58 AM
3

Equal rights for women, equal responsibilities for men.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 02:22 AM
1

Oh /u/Demmian ? He'll ban anyone.
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:41 PM
3

Lol. It's comments like this that make reddit worthwhile.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:27 AM
1

And yet yoo spress yourself in akordantz with the rools of grammatical, a conzept patriarky. I yoo wil avoyd. Too rashnil.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:40 PM
0

Feminists claimed responsibility for what?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:16 PM
1

Consequences, yes, but legal ones no. Incest was unnecessary in your hypothesis. As for her ideas of men, I only wish I could tell her men are obsessed with sex. I would also tell her they are capable of rising above it. And that girls too are obsessed in their own way. That's why she's obsessed with Harry Styles and another girl scaled has wall and entered a window to take his underwear. That girl is a pervert, I would tell her, just to see her reaction. I think she should know. I would explain…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 03:49 PM
1

You don't know if psychological trauma can be inflicted upon others? I think you should google what psychological trauma is... Well, yes, I'm well aware of the conventional view on this, but I'm not entirely convinced, nor do I necessarily understand it. I have never suffered sexual trauma like that. But there should still be some objective explanation. On the other hand, there may well be cases where it happens and is knowingly inflicted and that is wrong and criminal of course. But I would pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 03:19 PM
1

I disagree. We can't be responsible for what we can't prevent.
/r/MensRights14/12/16 10:31 AM
1

Yes to threatening. As to psychological damage, I'm not sure it is or can be caused or prevented by others.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 10:28 AM
1

You didn't fail. She failed.
/r/askTRP14/12/16 01:34 AM
1

Feminists is Saudi Arabia, or feminists somewhere else?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 01:33 AM
1

Yes of course. Actual physical harm is not caused by harassment. It might threaten harm, but if the actual harm is outlawed and the law successfully enforced, then the harassment is defanged. Harm should concern us, not feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/16 01:26 AM
1

"Some women have rape fantasies" ≠ "women in general have rape fantasies" In other news, the pope is Catholic. Even psychologists agree that some women have rape fantasies Thanks for confirming this for me. Moreover, although most women aren't erotically aroused by watching or reading about a male’s sexually abusing a woman, there are yet a substantial number of women who (again, similar to men) find themselves psychologically and physically turned on by such scenes of humiliation and degradatio…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/16 12:39 PM
1

Threatening is one thing. But merely being offensive should not be outlawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 08:10 PM
1

Weird how women have rape fantasies though, isn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 08:05 PM
1

I long to live in a liberal society which protects a person's natural right to do what he pleases so long as he causes others no actual harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 03:44 PM
1

Except if we're talking about female doctors, they're making good money themselves. But they have to work to get it. Look, if a man wants to get something done he goes and does it. If a woman wants to get something done, she has a choice. She can go and do it, or she can get a man to do it. That is her privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 02:19 PM
3

Why not though? For some women, being married to a rich man is the smartest thing they did. Moral high ground or not, having a maid, a cook and a huge house beats moral high ground any day. That's like asking how unethical Wall Street bankers how they sleep at night. They got paid, and money is a great compromise for most people. Sure the trophy wives will never love those fat rich dudes, but they'll wipe their tears with diamonds, heck they may not ever even cry. Pop in a few kids to secure the…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:27 PM
1

That would be a question for the OP. I merely rephrased the question. I will put your response to the OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:26 PM
1

Society does not allow men to look to women for financial support. There are exceptions. There may be biological underpinnings to this. There may not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:25 PM
1

Substituting x for y, we have xx > xx How can that be?
/r/MensRights12/12/16 01:16 PM
9

This question can also be phased, "Why do women whore themselves out to the highest bidder"?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/16 01:18 AM
1

Oh alright then.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 12:59 AM
3

Calm down dear.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:24 PM
4

Did they do that mathematically?
/r/MensRights11/12/16 09:21 PM
3

If x = y, y = x.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:56 PM
7

If feminism¹ is about equality, then I'm a feminist¹. That's why I'm against feminism².
/r/MensRights11/12/16 08:18 PM
1

Lol. Ah, the French. How could we complete? I freely concede to my superior.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 11:57 PM
2

On behalf of England, let me apologize for our ridiculous irregularities.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 09:35 PM
1

"Clang"? Bit of clanger that. Boom boom.
/r/TheRedPill05/12/16 04:52 PM
-1

I'm not sure whether we should lament the trending of the definiendum or rejoice over its definiens.
/r/MensRights30/11/16 09:45 PM
3

Evolution didn't expect red pill. Now weak men can be strong and...
/r/TheRedPill30/11/16 02:08 AM
9

Girls already know all about it. They are the ones whose conduct makes its truths true. Don't be deceived by the fact that they flatly deny them. You have nothing to tell them that they don't already know but which they find inconvenient to acknowledge.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/16 04:45 PM
15

I offer a very personal thought, ie just my own. The tipping point has not yet been reached but is coming very soon. Gradually some core mens rights views will becoming normal for women and for men. They will remain edgy, but will gradually become less controversial. But the pendulum will keep swinging. Though it will be accepted that the movement for equality for women cannot succeed by being grossly unfair to men, and that men are an important part of the equation, it will not be abandoned. Pe…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 12:59 PM
1

Because of they don't, they stop being normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 01:57 AM
2

Thanks, but I'm not handing in my right to vote or drive just because some salty group of male supremacists are salty over something Andrea Dworkin said 50 years ago. Too much salt already!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/16 01:55 AM
3

Great. Wanna fuck?
/r/askTRP27/11/16 10:00 PM
53

This is all a bit silly, isn't it? What is education for?
/r/MensRights27/11/16 09:32 PM
1

Yes. If they want to. But why would the strong seek terms with the weak?
/r/MensRights26/11/16 06:36 PM
8

'xactly!
/r/seduction26/11/16 04:00 PM
1

It's true. You are not the prize. You have to make yourself more prized. It isa bit demeaning that you have to do this, but those are the breaks, as your five years of observation will support.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 02:17 PM
3

I don't understand this. What is your point and how do you arrive at it?
/r/askTRP26/11/16 02:13 PM
6

In fact, it's really quite ridiculous to think people are laughing at you. Lol. But just because you tend to imagine it doesn't mean they aren't.
/r/askTRP26/11/16 02:07 PM
66

Nice hat. Fedora not needed. But why don't I feel safe from being banned by vicious smearing bigots? Was it something I didn't say?
/r/MensRights24/11/16 10:53 PM
2

Great video.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 04:57 PM
1

Yes. It would be better for feminism, too, because the nice guy meme comes from the women's shit that feminism ought to condemn in the name of equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/16 02:12 PM
1

Isn't this rather begging the question? Precisely what constitutes status is the issue between the pills.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/16 09:41 PM
1

It's seen as something of a classic in the manospere, but it's very old and maybe you could get it for free online.
/r/askTRP17/11/16 11:36 AM
1

I often see this "I came to say this" formula. What does it mean? Why not just "I agree"? From whence did you come?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:23 AM
1

No. You have no choice. Get thee behind me Satan. And stop saying "fuck"'
/r/MensRights17/11/16 11:09 AM
2

Have you ever heard of a book called "My secret garden"?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/16 01:43 AM
1

So no answer, just a deviation. You hit a.Sore spot.
/r/askTRP16/11/16 11:13 PM
1

Oh you are an obedient little devil.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 11:10 PM
1

Get thee behind me, Satan.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 11:00 PM
2

Women are responsible for their choices. Don't be so patriarchal and condescending. But don't hold women responsible for those choices that work out badly. That would be misogyny. Do you see what I did there? I brandish "patriarchy" and "misogyny" like talismans, and you must obey.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:58 AM
3

I'm about ready for a riot, too.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:52 AM
1

I'm glad you've accepted the point. Sorry I called you an "obsequious little runt". Perhaps that was unfair. I'm any case, my conclusion was not derived from his being a guardianista. I just happened to mention it.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 09:12 AM
8

I don't understand. I thought feminism was about equality. /s
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:28 AM
2

Worse. Some of them are men.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 01:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter