TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

matrixislife Archive

View 7 posts and 3,285 comments by matrixislife on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,285 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Cue up the dumb fucks who don't understand the system.
/r/MensRights27/01/24 10:10 PM
5

What we don't really acknowledge is that there are two types of men in here. The first set are those wanting men's rights, and have a mild left wing preference, the second are left wingers, who think men should have a little better treatment. At a guess I'd say you're the second type, given your concern is how the right wing are being affected by men's rights less. Personally nowadays Idgaf if the right use it as a wedge issue so long as they follow up on their promises, the left have only thems…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/24 09:07 PM
7

Bound to happen. The way current politics are treating men they were going to notice who was doing it more sooner or later. "Something something honey than vinegar."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/24 08:58 PM
7

Was sadly hit by 20 bullets and 2 grenades. One perculiarity, we're still not showing any enemy forces in the area [South London]
/r/MensRights26/01/24 11:55 PM
0

No, no, give it here, I'm collecting for a pillow.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 11:43 PM
1

Sounds like a plan then. You can institute a draft AFTER Johnson has served a month on the line as a regular infantryman.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 11:31 PM
10

Katherine Bennett, 21, was sentenced to 32 days in the Weld County Jail, 180 days of electronic home monitoring and five years of supervised probation Heh, and surprise surprise: Bennett's parents also told the judge that their daughter is unexpectedly pregnant with her fiance.
/r/MensRights26/01/24 01:27 PM
23

It's almost as if they are two completely different people with different roles. One could play a role better or worse than the other one did.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 03:00 PM
9

Excellent, thanks.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:34 PM
16

Maybe, but I really hope she doesn't get to benefit from this.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 06:04 PM
19

Hopefully those people get their money back.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 05:34 PM
5

And no, I'm not going to get into the "a 5 day old blastula is not a human being and has not particular rights" argument either. A mouse is more aware and infinitely more developed, are you going to argue for it's human rights? No, don't answer that, as I said I'm not getting into it.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:20 AM
5

Nope, sorry, not getting behind that one.
/r/MensRights23/01/24 12:07 AM
9

So in a mens rights sub you're arguing to remove some of mens rights?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 10:46 PM
16

They can also be appalling ones. Couples are told nowadays "don't stay together for the children, that really screws them up". How bad are kids when told their dad is only around because he's forced to be?
/r/MensRights22/01/24 10:43 PM
14

"Contributes to the medical fees of childbirth": same principle applies, this was not his preference, he should only be liable for costs equivalent to how much he would have contributed towards a termination. And yes, if he made his objection known soon enough, that would be the cost of plan B.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 10:41 PM
10

Australia, why am I not surprised. The covid years really let that place go to the dogs.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 02:26 AM
1

Yeah, that happens. I'm sure it has done in a very very rare circumstance but you can probably count the times on one hand. Men aren't trapped in abusive marriages financially, it's almost always threats to DARVO and get him arrested for abuse.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 02:13 AM
7

Wrong 3 times in 1 quote, that's pretty impressive. Then again she never impressed anyone for her intellectual abilities.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 01:55 AM
1

Generic means everybody. Trying to speak for everyone, saying everyone knew exactly what they wanted at that age. That's what I was arguing against, as it's obviously not the case. Which I've said a few times now, I'd have thought youl'd understand that point easily enough but it seems to be difficult for you.
/r/MensRights11/01/24 03:36 PM
1

All my friends same thing we had differences in who we thought were hot but none of us were confused. That’s just a trope that’s gets regurgitated over and over. When you went generic you started talking for everyone, saying everyone knew exactly what they wanted. Nope, that's wrong.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 11:10 PM
2

At 13 I was very sure about who and what I thought was attractive. Zero confusion no doubt. Disagree with that, as is fairly obvious.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 07:20 PM
2

Except there's plenty of people who disagree with you, including me. At 13 so many years ago, I had no idea what I was even meant to find attractive.
/r/MensRights10/01/24 03:53 PM
3

I wasn't actually going there with that comment, but it does raise a point. Are there numbers available globally about the percentages of children taking up treatment for dysphoria in each country? It'd be interesting if it showed one or two countries where it has not taken off at all.
/r/MensRights09/01/24 09:10 PM
12

who isn't confused at, say, thirteen. Exactly. This has targeted the most emotionally vulnerable group of people in our society, adolescents, at the point where they have no defences to offer against criticism or commentary, at a point where social media use and the opportunity to get thousands of misguided or malevolent opinions is maximised. No one at that age feels confident about their bodies, and the trans debate has put it front and centre for everyone. Add in the highly politicised "suppo…
/r/MensRights09/01/24 08:49 PM
4

How nice of you to flee back to England the moment the heat is on instead of staying in Australia and facing up to your problems. Sounds like she dodged a bullet mate. The moment she popped out that kid you would've gorced her to have you'd have one argument and flee back to the petticoats of the Motherland. Sounds like the correct one of you left Australia IMO. None of that has anything to do with "more to the story", or anything about an on-going investigation. Might as well just be honest and…
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:34 PM
5

Don't be so pathetic, we both know what you were saying.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:04 PM
5

When you started on him earlier.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 03:03 PM
4

You're gay and pulling the "you're not a real man" card? Might want to check that out with a therapist, there's definitely something internalised there..
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:33 PM
17

If she's constantly accusing you of cheating without reason, maybe she's the reason. If she has the kid and comes after you for child support, insist on a paternity test.
/r/MensRights07/01/24 02:27 PM
3

That's fine on an evolutionary scale, but put you and a woman up against a tiger and see how fast you decide to run. In that circumstance I'd bet you'd be screaming "screw the survival of the species".
/r/MensRights06/01/24 05:28 PM
2

Birkenhead drill.
/r/MensRights06/01/24 05:27 PM
1

No, I meant the one that related to minimum sentencing where the Home Secretary was stripped of his powers to set them. Afaik whole life sentencing is still a thing, and should remain so. There's a whole list of mitigating factors that can be found on the sentencing guidelines, and they do not relate to a defence.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/01/24 01:35 PM
3

Someone is spamming one article. Each article says Despite the accuracy of polygraphs remaining highly contested in scientific circles, It must be a slow news day.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 11:57 PM
3

Duh, I've been subbed here since it was created so yeah. And all the way along I've been arguing in both subs that this activism is more important than the left and right labels you apply. Have you learned nothing from the last few years, how any form of activism gets split up into smaller and smaller pieces until it has no power at all? Or are you one of those people who think that because the left supports feminism that you must do as well, and screw men, they don't deserve rights?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/24 07:24 PM
1

Didn't they get rid of minimum sentences when the ECHR overruled them? This is one of those "stock value can go up and down" situations, you mention aggravating factors but perculiarly ignored mitigating factors. Not that there should be any in this case, but weirder things have happened.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/24 02:41 PM
18

It's the combination of quality and quantity. There's too many bad movies. Rogue One was enjoyable, especially with the lack of a happy ever after which I thought was mandatory for Disney, but the actual Star Wars sequels have been complete duds. Rey is a Mary Sue, the first one was almost a carbon copy of Star Wars, wtf did they do to the original cast, and many many other problems.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 01:40 PM
2

Time for Disney to prove itself. They've been living off the Star Wars reputation for too long, if this is going to be another crap effort then there's no need for anyone to go see it. All they really care about is selling tickets, so if you have any doubts don't see it in cinema.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 01:33 PM
7

Class action suit time?
/r/MensRights03/01/24 10:54 PM
1

Politicians are politicians, none of them are anyone's friends, unless that friend can help them get re-elected. Both right and left-wing politicians have positions against the MRM for different reasons, imo in the long run it might well be more likely to get support from the right than the left. The important thing is getting the message across, trying to tell people that they can't contribute because they are of one alignment or the other is self-defeating.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:12 PM
3

I haven't seen this before, but did think it looked rather posed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:08 PM
5

I've been subbed in there for around a decade, and can't say I've seen any of the surveys. Not to say they don't exist, just that I haven't seen them. It'd make sense, seeing as the majority of people online are younger, and younger people tend to be more left wing. The MRM has quite a few political enemies, most of those are active on reddit. There are regular posts in the MR sub that try to say "left wingers don't deserve mens rights" and so on, the right version of this post. Most of the time…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 06:06 PM
1

So anything from 2-1 upwards is possible, since the judge can use or ignore guidelines for tariffs.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/24 05:57 PM
5

Men are a collective, we cover the full range of political perspectives. If you start trying to say "those men can't contribute" you first off chop your support in half, and viable suggestions in half, but then you also effectively de-franchise those not in your political group. It's self-defeating, and a tactic used by those to try to mimnimise a political movement. [divide and conquer] That's ignoring that the vast majority of people supporting the MRM are right wing or centrist, and trying to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 02:28 PM
8

There's always someone trying to fracture the growth of the Mens Rights Movement, both those who think this is inappropriate, and those who think screaming "the right can't be a part of this".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/01/24 02:08 PM
1

We can hope. I should have put a 20-1 in there for up to 6 years inside which I think is the most likely result. I've heard this "be prepared for a life sentence" before.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/24 01:31 PM
5

I wouldn't give a toss about it, unless she tries to palm it off as her fiances. That'd be incredibly cruel.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/24 10:00 PM
28

Place your bets, place your bets: 10-1 suspended sentence 5-1 home curfew, not allowed out after 6pm. Except weekends of course. 2-1 Several years sentence, but taking into account her time in custody she gets released immediately, time served. Evens: Up to 18 months in a minimum security facility 10-1 Up to 3 years in a normal lockup. 100-1 20 or less years in prison. 250-1 Life meaning life.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/01/24 08:19 PM
-1

Antagonistic, idiotic, and semi-literate. Yeah, I don't need you in my life.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:35 PM
7

Icks this woman has given me: stubby satubby fingers a face full of acne a nose full of bogies, turns out to be a nose looks like a dart board, it has so many holes in it. Has NO idea how to hold a bow. This isn't misandry though, they're aimed at individual men, not all men. She's just a cunt.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:29 PM
-4

Erm, how many men do you know say "we don't need men"? Because that's what I was talking about, I assume zero, so it would be only women saying it. [seeing as you need it spelling out for you]
/r/MensRights02/01/24 01:50 AM
-7

When "people" say it? I doubt any men would actually come out with that, it being so easily refuted in their case.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 12:11 AM
14

It's interesting how they manage to compare the two, I assume they have telepathy or other ways of directly comparing the experiences?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/23 11:35 PM
6

This sounds like one of those "someone is incredibly biased towards women, therefore they count as being unbiased against women" type reports.
/r/MensRights31/12/23 09:45 PM
7

Quite right too.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 03:41 PM
41

Because, occasionally "You are not the father" and she has to go find the real dad and start working out how to get child support etc. Plus, would you want to stay around a woman who cheated on you? So her lifestyle gets really messed up. Her own fault ofc, but you asked why women don't like DNA test.
/r/MensRights30/12/23 12:00 PM
30

Good prospects of rehabilitation What? And the judge decided to ignore her current husband as a victim of her actions, despite there being no reason at all for him to attack her ex if she hadn't had input into it.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 12:16 PM
1

You need to find a way to get recordings in your place of work. You're outnumbered, so traditional he-said she-said will weigh against you. The only way to beat that is to have video and audio records of what's actually going on. If you can push for something along those lines "on the grounds of safety for all staff" linked with violence at work directives, that might be a way to go.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 11:46 AM
1

Sure, it's a possibility for the future, I was talking about what was in place right now though. Certainly people making false accusations belong on the Sex offenders register.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 07:35 PM
0

These are not a good idea. There's not much support, and putting it into a petition like this just shows FB and others that there isn't much public opposition to it.
/r/MensRights27/12/23 01:02 PM
1

Oh you're certainly a troll, and you notice I hadn't turned off notifications.. so there's that. I just love having a prat commenting up and down a comment chain, so I'll sort that out right now.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 12:06 AM
2

in the slightest, at this point you're just trolling. And btw, women supporting each other is not the same as feminism. And no, I don't want to discuss that with you either.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 11:35 PM
2

Are you an idiot? National Organisation of Women. MPs putting their feminist credentials in their bios, Hillary Clinton ffs. You don't think it's obvious to everyone that women support each other, but men don't? I'm curious how you thought such a short-sighted and ideologically nauseating comment would get any traction?
/r/MensRights25/12/23 10:32 PM
2

It's perspective though, the argument "there's probably not many accusations, and it didn't really do much harm did it?" carries a lot of weight, no matter how true or false that might be. And the public think "there's no smoke without fire, he did something to upset her, women won't be nasty for no reason" again, no matter the truth or lack of for that concept. Both of these need changing, we need to focus on the individual and the significant harm any false accusation does to him before either…
/r/MensRights25/12/23 10:31 AM
9

The problem is politics. American prosecutors are looking to go into politics so don't want to upset the rather powerful feminist lobby, while in the UK the prosecutors are answering to the Ministry of Justice who again are afraid of the feminist lobby. The answer is better public awareness of what's going on, and how common false accusations really are. Only when they know they have some public backing will they start doing their damn jobs.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 09:46 PM
12

They're perjury and should be charged as such. The crime already exists, the sentence already exists, it's up to the public prosecutors to apply it.
/r/MensRights24/12/23 05:00 PM
1

Well, I tried to do it giving you credit for being in this sub, seems I was wrong to do that.
/r/MensRights22/12/23 09:58 AM
2

Sounds like a lawsuit in the making.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 06:42 PM
5

It shouldn't be The university said its current intake of such students was below average for the sector. when the sector already shows a huge bias, it should be based on an absolute scale.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/12/23 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, you're crackers. Bye.
/r/MensRights21/12/23 10:57 AM
0

You misunderstand. Homicide covers murder of anyone. Feminists are pushing the phrase femicide to make it sound like women are being killed just because they are women. This is nuts. Now you're trying to push the androcide phrase, this is also nuts. Do you really want to sound as insane as the average feminist propagandist?
/r/MensRights21/12/23 09:52 AM
60

So looking at the uni-direcitonal violence, at 28.3% women are committing IPV at more than double men's 13.8%. Yeah, I know, the aim must be to stop all of it, but it's interesting to know how biased the message has become.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 12:53 PM
1

Hmm, think I need some time off, that's twice I've misinterpreted a comment that was actually supportive. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 03:36 PM
2

Aha, apologies, I took your comment as referring to mine.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/23 02:02 PM
4

Don't give lunatics too much power over your own life.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/23 11:07 AM
2

DARVO: Deny, Attack, reverse victim and offender. Or in this case, reverse who's been playing with the words to make them mean what they want. That's what you just did. Racism: dislike or hatred of a group based on their race or colour of their skin. That's it. Nothing about systems or power or shit like that, that's been the definition for centuries. Then certain groups realised they couldn't call other people racist without being hit with the same term, because all racial groups dislike or out…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/23 10:56 AM
1

Duh, well, there is a way, but I hope to god that's not why people are circumcising their kids. Look at my previous comments, you do not need to spend effort convincing me that circumcision of baby boys is very very wrong.
/r/MensRights16/12/23 10:49 AM
3

The people who weren't invited should hold a party on the same date, same time. Invite everyone. See who shows up. They can call it "The not for racists Xmas party".
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/23 03:36 PM
12

Might not be systemic racism, but it's certainly racist.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/23 03:32 PM
3

Negative consequences aren't necessary, but the opportunity to network with other politicians is a benefit that's being denied to those who aren't invited, so there you are. This is racist af.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/23 03:30 PM
1

It probably is. Which imo is fair enough as they have a relevant interest in the subject. That's not a medical benefit though, it's a religious element. But if that's the case, they should stick to that part of it, not try to cloud the waters by claiming it improves a kids health somehow. Personally, I think it's more the Kellogs effect, and the effect of their advertising. Doing it to reduce a kids sex drive, yeah that's a great motive.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:29 AM
7

She has no idea what the word "diversity" means.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 08:20 AM
-8

I'm not arguing about murder here whatsoever. I'm arguing about the ridiculous use of the andro- prefix. Feminists call it femicide and sound insane when they do it, so do you really want to copy that and sound equally insane when you talk about androcide?
/r/MensRights13/12/23 05:09 PM
-10

So the answer is use the same shitty tactics they use? Lie and deceive in order to make a minimal point? That's doing as much to change men's characters as the whole patriarchy crap.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:59 PM
11

This whole debate is nauseating. There's no "medical benefits" to chopping part of a kids dick off. Those claiming it's to prevent utis don't seem to realise most boys don't get utis. And it's not as though they wait around to find out whether this baby in particular is going to be one of the rare ones. The whole argument reeks of "it was done to me, so it should be done to kids". Evil cunts.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:56 PM
-14

Do we really need this? The loony feminists are talking about femicide, we don't need to copy them.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:48 PM
37

Manslaughter for the brother, and whatever you can throw at her for lying and causing his death. Perjury at least, though I doubt that'll happen with the way that police chief did his best not to call her a liar.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 04:45 PM
22

UTIs are common in the elderly as well. Let's line them up. In boys and men UTIs are very rare, but do you know who really get UTIs? Women and girls get lots of Utis [because of a very short urethra and it's placement inside the vagina very close to the anus]. I don't see you advocating for a surgical method of preventing that. You know why not? Because the whole premise is absurd. Prevention is by better hygiene. In both sexes, but especially women.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 12:04 PM
14

I'm assuming that female circumcision is fine so long as it's to prevent HIV spread as well.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:57 AM
11

I don't know that most people on reddit are pro-feminist, but they are certainly pro-women, which imo is quite reasonable [in the same way being pro-male is a reasonable thing also]. The problem is when feminists manage to conflate feminism with women, so they argue any attack against feminism is an attack on women. That's the first thing you need to rule out in a discussion. The only way to get better at arguing the issues, is to argue the issues. Avoiding discussions like that is your option, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/23 04:56 AM
-3

Chill mate, it was just a throwaway joke, nothing to argue about here.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:57 PM
7

Damn it I forgot again, there's a hell of a lot of people in here who can't spot a joke, or sarcasm.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 11:56 PM
-45

But are you saying that because you really feel it, or because you want to let women feminists off cos of the "women is wonderful" effect? Good luck working that one out :)
/r/MensRights12/12/23 07:24 PM
1

Was talking about the benefits or not of spermicides, and if they help against unplanned conception. That is a hell of a lot worse imo, that's covert conception. What we need is something non-toxic to skin/mucous membrane, but is very fast, very effective against sperm cells. Problem with hotsauce is you can't put it in a condom before you use it. Well, you could, but I wouldn't want to, the idea of someone paying for their treachery is fitting, but not worth that burning sensation. Question is …
/r/MensRights12/12/23 05:34 PM
8

I'm not totally clear on the wording there, I've seen a couple of sites talk about increased risk of infections especially HIV from using condoms with spermicides. Presumably the liquid component provides an easier environment for the virus to move around in. The above NHS guide would appear to be comparing condoms with spermicide to condoms without, elsewhere on the page it still talks about 98% pregnancy prevention, but it seems clear that the spermicide is actually ineffective or at most mini…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 12:47 AM
7

The general public is not going to react to this, it's "nothing to do with men, women's bodies women's choice" Yes, I understand the hipocrisy here.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:18 PM
9

https://www.vanguardngr.com/ Where does it state it's a satire site?
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:10 PM
4

It would appear to be Nigeria-based news. Presumably that's where Jane comes from. I'm sure they are heartbroken at not meeting your requirements for a trustworthy-looking site.
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:09 PM
29

However, no current evidence suggests that spermicide condoms are in fact any more effective than regular ones. Random contraception site. Condoms with spermicide Some condoms come with spermicide on them. You should avoid using this type, or using spermicide as a lubricant, as it does not protect against STIs and may increase your risk of infection. NHS guidelines on condoms, now this I didn't realse!
/r/MensRights11/12/23 11:02 PM
1

In the wake of this, the force created a Sex Equality & Tackling Misogyny Oversight Board Wtf Scotland? I suppose this means the country that prosecuted a guy for teaching his dog tricks is showing it wasn't an accident. You've got to love the title of the board though, the discrimination is right there.. "Sex Equality", hmm ok "Tackling Misogyny" hey, I thought we were talking about equality??
/r/MensRights10/12/23 07:35 PM
14

It's comparable IF her partner is telling her she has to look after them. This might be relevant in some areas of sex work, but even then you have to note the huge efforts to try to make it safe for women which don't exist in most jobs men can access. But afaik very few women especially with kids take a job that has any element of danger attached to it.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 11:26 AM
23

When the situation merits it, many women revert from strong independant women into "you get to take care of me now". Which means men getting jobs that pay more, which often means more dangerous jobs. This is what's required by circumstance, and in these cases the circumstance is that he's being expected and demanded to feed two or more people off his wage. Sure, he "chose" the job, but he didn't get much choice in the choosing.
/r/MensRights10/12/23 08:55 AM
17

This sounds like 2XC or somewhere similar. This and similar is a big part of why there are so many un-prosecuted rape cases, and why real rape cases do not get the attention they should. You'd think that'd be enough to convince them not to do it, but nope. Punishing a man for a crime he never committed is much more important to them.
/r/MensRights09/12/23 03:48 PM
9

Afaik the intent is "Patriarchy = It's men's fault". So you have a DV incident, patriarchy, it's men's fault. You have a murder, patriarchy, it's men's fault. You have a male suicide, patriarchy, it's men's fault. Feminists deny it in public, but that's the intent and way feminists avoid accepting any responsibility for their own action or lack of action. If it's all men's fault, none of it is yours.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/12/23 02:31 AM
5

SOP for the Mail, but at least they post the stories in the first place.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 11:57 PM
3

She's not been charged yet so bail can't be based on charges made.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:20 AM
1

You're not listening. I am not one of them, and I'll argue against circumcision with anyone. You're not telling me anything I don't already know, and agree with, and advocate for. And of course you can pick and choose the things that you consider important and not. That's been my whole argument, the idea that "you have to support everything or we don't want you" is stupid, and likely to hold us back from achieving anything.
/r/MensRights07/12/23 01:17 AM
1

And where have I argued differently? There are literally millions of men who've been circumcised, who believe it's not a big deal. Are you telling me they can never support mens rights? I am not one of them, and I'll argue against circumcision with anyone. But this isn't about me, it's about trying to tell all those men to fuck off, go be feminists, because of one part of their own beliefs. It's short sighted and frankly stupid.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 11:52 PM
1

Glad to hear it, and to clairfy, I was not targetting any complaint at either Jews or Muslims above, but at the comment above mine that claimed you could not support MR while accepting circumcision. Stay safe out there.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 10:59 PM
1

It was a response to the comment above: Yes. You cannot be in men’s rights subreddit and support one of the worst crimes against boys and men. It was also saying the comment was wrong, I've seen both Jews and Muslims support mens rights. Trying to say that they have to be against one aspect of harm against men is gatekeeping, on a large section of male society. I don't think it's the number 1 MR issue, but I'm not willing to ignore it either.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 10:57 PM
1

No I'm not being anti- anything except anti harming boys. The rabid use of denunciations like that is a very feminist-style behaviour though. If I've mis-characterised something above, you get to explain how, not just point and scream.
/r/MensRights06/12/23 09:37 PM
2

There'll certainly be some Jewish/Muslims who object to circumcision, but it's been and gone, and it's hard to break with the rest oif their religious group over that. You're quite correct that a lot of people won't consider it important, but other issues like the draft or retirement age etc will be much more relevant to them. It's still a subject that needs bringing up here, but to treat it as a gatekeeping event "you can't be an MRA if you don't hate circumcision" is plainly wrong. I do like t…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:57 PM
0

Welp, that just blew out all the Jewish and Muslim supporters of mens rights. Thing is, afaik they accept that it's a form of sacrifice to replace the first born son [the whole Abraham/Isaac thing], it's not done for reasons of hygiene, or because "it looks better", it's a religious sacrifice, a loss of something to honour god. Now imo it's not their sacrifice to make, if they want to do that then they should wait until they're 18 and decide to do it for themselves, but at least they realise tha…
/r/MensRights03/12/23 04:40 PM
10

You could do worse than to string up whoever came up with the idea of ignoring your usual criminal justice laws. Tell them you will accept a university decision as they are swinging in the breeze.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 10:18 PM
13

she went about setting up a new social network to give people in challenging circumstances a place where they can be heard. So, like being falsely accused of sexual assault? That's a challenging circumstance.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 10:16 PM
2

Fair enough, but we're talking from the perspective of a woman having the rights to abortion while the man has none. Which is inherently unfair as it is his child as well, he should have a say in whether he wants to have a kid or not. If the society doesn't want this choice then it needs to legislate to deal with that. This whole situation is really going to get screwed over when they finally get around to artificial gestation, it can hardly be "her body her choice" when it's not her body anymor…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 05:14 PM
1

Imo it's a question of priorities. We can debate the pros and cons of various issues, but without the power to get anything done it's all redundant. We should be looking to get the votes lined up to make the changes we need, and then we can have a real conversation about all the different issues.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:59 AM
1

The government doesn't agree, women's rights movements are politically dangerous to go up against. So getting the system changed to be fair is not going to happen without a lot of effort. Simply, we need men's rights to have the same impact as feminism, until that happens all this is futile.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:39 AM
6

From an equality and fairness point of view men absolutely should be able to say "no, I don't want anything to do with this situation." Of course, equality and fairness only seems to apply going in one direction.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 02:20 AM
2

The arguments are generally futile, the point is that the government says the kid needs child support, so who is going to pay for it? There's only one choice. This is why a kid who's been raped ends up paying child support, it has nothing to do with choice, and everything to do with finances. It's going to take a long long time before we can get any government to change their position on this.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 01:44 AM
16

Changing the language to suit the ideology is an old trick, it's the story behind 1984 for example. Can't talk about fathers and children being alienated if the concept is child and mother sabotage, that's right out of the NuSpeak playbook. Which appears to suit the authoritarian feminist style right down to the ground.
/r/MensRights30/11/23 05:34 PM
1

With the conservative government having held power for over 10 years now..
/r/MensRights29/11/23 09:00 PM
2

Yeah, when political ideology meets science that's the result. I just hope no one sane actually believes it.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:44 PM
1

It's endurance on the part of the pigs, the monkeys are there to make them run out of stamina quicker. No one said hunters have to be stupid about how they do things. Why should there be any women in the hunting party?
/r/MensRights29/11/23 07:10 PM
6

Missed out the important info, that there's a consultation ongoing until February next year. https://consult.justice.gov.uk/sentencing-council/imposition-of-community-and-custodial-sentences/ or email [email protected]. On a personal note, if you're going to respond to this, please remember that you're representing us and all men by doing so, keep it civil.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:53 PM
1

Maybe consider how modern day hunters use monkeys against wild pigs? It's endurance hunting with a slight/learned variation to it.
/r/MensRights29/11/23 04:44 PM
8

Ultra ultra long distance swimming!! Checkmate biguts!!! Women do better in that event apparently, the likelihood is because the subcutaneous fat they have makes them more buoyant than men.. obviously a crucial benefit for hunting.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 11:25 PM
6

Hunting was an endurance event for a while. You'd have to look up when etc, but the trick is apparently in our sweat glands. Because we can sweat and animals with fur can't [they pant instead, but when they are running they can't pant], we can keep going longer than they can.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 11:20 PM
10

"Trust the science". This is why some science isn't worth trusting.
/r/MensRights28/11/23 11:15 PM
1

Sure. I've no problem with people coming here and arguing their points, I spoke up because it was an alt, which is mostly done so as not to have their real opinions on view. A couple of times people have botched switching to their alts and we see a huge amount of misandry in their everyday discussions.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 07:27 PM
1

Personally, I think it's a little different when 90% of the site supports your opinion and you go into the small space that doesn't, compared to trying to discuss this on the general subs and getting absolutely hammered.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:59 PM
14

Welcome to reddit. Where do you think this "general perception of men" comes from? That's what this entire post is about.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:35 PM
10

/r/FemaleSexPredatorNews
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:28 PM
2

That's an alt specifically for this sub you're talking to, for all we know it's your alt, a little less congratulations on having a "different opinion" if you don't mind. Just to be clear, if you had an alt doing this in a feminist sub, it'd be banned immediately.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 06:17 PM
11

/r/FemaleSexPredatorNews/
/r/MensRights24/11/23 04:17 PM
2

Apex fallacy. "This one man has a better life than me, so it must be oppression." The millions living in the dirt are completely invisible to them. Anyone who makes that argument are living with blinders on.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 05:15 PM
1

Because that kid gets through so many diapers.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 10:13 PM
41

Because obviously anything negative about women is misogyny. So what if it's true, that doesn't matter at all, shut up Dave. We're going to have to have a proper meeting about this, your attitude recently has been very disappointing.
/r/MensRights22/11/23 12:49 AM
1

Pretty much yeah. That and that we jail people for non-violent crimes, putting them in prison with violent offenders, who we then fail to protect them from. As for the downvotes, either it's people thinking I shouldn't support anything good for women [NO, that's not what MRA is about] or I'm being stalked by someone I pissed off on the outside [probably quite a lot of people], or it's feminists in here of which there seems to be a growing population. Either way, it's imaginary internet points, i…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 10:43 PM
1

I thought that only happened in the US Title IX stuff? Not afaik over here.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:04 PM
3

They already have. Men get longer sentences than women, it should be the same across the board.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 03:35 PM
1

Not what I'd consider non-violent crime. I didn't say the current situation was what I wanted, I was describing how I'd run it.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 03:32 PM
-5

It's something we should aspire to for everyone, not just women. Non-violent crime that doesn't cause injury should be dealth with outside prison unless there's a history of repeat offending. I'm all for this, SO LONG as men get the benefit of it as well.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 04:35 AM
5

I've already explained that above.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 03:05 PM
2

The Big Lie.
/r/MensRights19/11/23 01:49 AM
31

It's unfortunately relevant. The current meme is that men are evil, women are victims. So in the last couple of days we've had a petition to stop women going to jail if they have kids, and Billie Ellish spouting how women "never say anything nasty about men because women are nice". We end up having to argue against this point, so being able to show a recent case of something like this tends to deal with that BS. Some people seem to believe women aren't capable of anything truly evil.
/r/MensRights18/11/23 07:55 PM
1

Right, so if I've got this straight, objectification means reducing someone to an object, "women who have a body count above 1 are used cars" is a good example of objectification, nowhere did it imply that they are attractive. i disagree with everything this just strikes me the most, like we can't live in reality which is that different, kind of moment those who objectify her are men online mostly, and most likely in music industry too, as for journalists [s]he has expressed disagreement with th…
/r/MensRights17/11/23 09:36 PM
1

The part where it makes any sense, in English?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 11:09 PM
1

Nope, still no idea, it's gibberish. women who have BC ab 1 are used cars is a good example
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:04 PM
1

I'm sorry, I've no idea what that first sentence says, the other two are pretty dodgy as well.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 02:14 AM
11

Corrections officials confirmed that Williams was the victim of a “possible inmate-on-inmate assault” that left him “unresponsive” at Staton Correctional Facility. That is a confession, that the warden and guards failed in their duty of care. It's their jobs to keep the inmates in their custody safe. I'm just wondering how would corporate manslaughter fit in this?
/r/MensRights16/11/23 01:02 AM
1

Usually, yeah, or at least attractive to those looking. Why is it when people disagree they always pick on the least important part of the comment to do it to? The important part is that those "objectifying" her are those she relies on to spread her music, she can't go after them, so she has to pick a different group to complain about. In this case, men are the surrogate for her being unwilling to criticise journalists.
/r/MensRights16/11/23 12:32 AM
7

I think going to a same sex university is a choice for the enrolling student, so overall it's a good thing. This should apply to both men and women. Allowing one and condemning the other is pure hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 06:11 PM
11

She's complaining that she's being objectified, but the only people talking about her looks are the journalists she relies on to get her more fans. In herself she's absolutely average, no one would give her a second look. Yet she can't point the finger at the journalists, so she has to complain about a different group.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 02:28 PM
8

She can smell shit every where she goes.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 07:03 PM
1

You mean it's too subtle?
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:36 PM
24

Or just "go yourself".
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:30 PM
16

Well, it's being coordinated against men, so I don't see why not. Sure, there'll be a few deals on tuition or scholarships offered, but these places rely on the average student paying the full price. So don't do that, should be easy enough to convince yourself: "They don't want men to get the best treatment so why should I pay them the best price?"
/r/MensRights12/11/23 02:14 PM
100

Men should absolutely never go there. There are plenty of other universities to go to. Obviously this is a top-down approach from the university chiefs, so I wonder how they'd react to falling admissions and fees paid.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 11:11 AM
13

Nah, it's not the dating market they are trying to control, it's the relationship.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/23 11:08 AM
2

I was talking about pressure from staff just after birth. You'll get some male doctors, but considering most nurses on maternity will be female, the greater pressure to get circumcised will come from women.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 04:42 PM
17

Assuming the pressure comes from men.. half the time it's from women.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 01:00 PM
7

Take the hint, stop talking shit you troll.
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:57 PM
8

The "chop bits off your baby because everyone else is doing it" argument carries no water. By the time he starts having sex most Americans will have noticed that the rest of the world doesn't do this. I don't need to list all the reasons not to do it, you've done a reasonable job up there. The choice is simple, to mutilate your son or not. Assuming you make the right choice, your next job is to make damn sure the hospital doesn't "assume" you want him cutting up and do it anyway, in the "better …
/r/MensRights11/11/23 12:55 PM
9

It's not been abolished, it's just been bypassed, same as with freedom of speech. The government in the form of the law courts are required to presume innocence in court. Private organisations have no such requirements so you see newspapers and blogs blaring all kinds of stuff about someone, with very little option to get it corrected, and even if you do it's usually way too late.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 05:55 PM
60

Good riddance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/11/23 11:40 AM
1

Read what I'm saying. Feminists =/= women, women =/= feminists. There's a ridiculous amount of male feminists, and plenty of women [including in this sub] who aren't feminists. I said "don't give feminists that support", and you say I'm incorrect?
/r/MensRights09/11/23 01:29 PM
-1

Point is, doing the "all women" bit makes those accusations real, not dumb. You doing that harms the credibility of anyone here trying to tell someone that they've been lied to by feminists, when the listeners come to take a look at the sub and they see that the feminists were telling the truth, the women-hate is real in here. Meaning the MRA is obviously lying. So don't give feminists that support, don't fuck all of us over just because you want to make a statement you don't really believe anyw…
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:37 PM
26

"All women" don't refuse responsibility for their own actions, as much as "all men" dont always own their own actions. Some do, certainly, possibly a majority depending on where you are, but whenever you blanket state "all blah blah" you're reducing the credibility of the sub, and giving valid grounds for accusations of misogyny. So let's not do that, ok?
/r/MensRights08/11/23 07:07 PM
12

But they're strong n independant women, they don't need no men. Good, off you go then.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 11:57 AM
3

You mean feminists are acting exactly like someone with privilege and doing their level best to defend it, and prevent anyone else getting it? Bomb threats to conferences, physically threatening advocates, banning discussions in public forums? Does this really sound at all like an organisation representing the oppressed, or does it sound much more like someone in power trying to keep the lid on things?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/11/23 11:15 AM
21

Go show the feminists that they are talking crap or don't, not bothered. As for that mod, she's incredibly toxic, every comment she makes is to someone she's banned/deleted their comment. I guess she probably thinks she's defending feminism, she's just on a power trip.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/23 01:58 PM
7

Because it is verbotten to blame anything on women, so they have to find something else to blame, and gaming/porn is always the easy target for the lazy reporter.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 10:55 PM
4

not many men? maybe a couple of men? one or two men out of billions?
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:16 PM
17

I'm finding much more the urge to just reply "fuck off" rather than trying to argue with feminists. They don't listen to any logical arguments, just parrot the talking points they've learnt and try to twist whatever you say to indicate some kind of hostility towards women.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 10:15 PM
2

Maybe you should do as I suggested?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 04:18 PM
1

It's not misogynistic by definition but it definitely sows the seeds for misogyny. Sounds like mission creep to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 01:07 PM
13

Ask Indian MRA how they are treated in their own country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 01:06 PM
58

There's some in the mensrights sub. Answer me a question though, where can anyone go to talk about the real-life fucking over they just had in divorce court, or family court, or just plain courts, because the world insists women can never do wrong? They can't come here, this is strictly for left-wingers only. The menslib sub? Hell no. So mensrights it is. And along with the raw emotions comes an element of "I hate all women right now". Is anyone actually surprised by that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/11/23 01:04 PM
2

Of course they can. This is a very basic question that we need to start taking as read or we will never get past the starting post. Similar questions are: can women sexually assault men? ; can women abuse men? ; are men discriminated against in the legal system? The answer to all the above is Yes. Now, can we start looking at how these play out, and what we can do about them?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/10/23 07:29 PM
33

Students want her back because they know they'll get an easy ride if she is in charge. She's a professional victim, a 'minority' woman leaning on that to punish the 'cis white male'. He's the one who wants all police killed. I'm not seeing anywhere that deserves any sympathy here.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 01:59 PM
1

Sure, if there's one thing you can put money on it's that left wingers will find ways to schism. This sub is a perfect example already. But I think it'll be worse than that, some people will go the "we have to work from inside the organisation to change it" route, while others will go the "we have to make deals with the devil to get equal rights" route. Both positions have some justification, but it will dilute the movement. SPLITTERS!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/23 09:10 PM
1

Right now, no, none of that's going to happen. There is too little interest in pushing governments to acknowledge men have issues. Politicians are split into "left" and "right", and neither group is interested in helping men. The only way I see men getting any kind of representation is through polarisation, the left has feminists which hate men's rights, so the right will take up the cause by default. Obviously, this is not how we want it to go. The question you need to ask yourself is, are you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/10/23 06:53 PM
7

It's time we start asking "who is representing men on these inquiries?" And if no one is, then we get someone in there to do the job.
/r/MensRights29/10/23 07:45 PM
9

That's pretty stark and very direct. There's no other possible conclusion you can draw from those stories. I knew about Erin Pizzey, I wasn't aware of those others though the same treatment has happened to other researchers. I'd love to see a tin men on the sheer amount of effort put in to stopping research information making it to mainstream awareness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/10/23 11:08 AM
54

I'd suggest take a look at thetinmenblog There's quite a lot that focuses only on mens issues, but there's quite a lot that relates women's experiences to men's, and thats the obvious tie in for feminism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 09:16 PM
2

Fair enough, though I think if you're going to offer a range of options you should include the most realistic one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 08:00 PM
12

Feminists first real impact on the world was the campaign for votes for women. That was accompanied by an extensive letter bomb campaign. The extremists are still a very significant part of feminism. And we get posts "What is your relationship with this psychotic group that hates your very existence?" I suspect we need an update to the Karen Straughan quote, people seem to be forgetting how feminism does everything it can to shit on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 07:38 PM
8

Where's the option of "it is a best a malignant cancer on the world, but more likely the product of a depraved and evil collection of minds".?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/10/23 07:28 PM
9

Women know other women are judging them. I agree that they do not seem to comprehend that men don't give a toss about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/23 01:55 AM
8

Define "sexual act", and then ask "how many of these women felt it was inappropriate or unwanted?" I've kissed a girlfriend awake before now, and by the terms they are using that would be classed as assault.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:50 PM
6

It would be useful, just to show everyone how much men actually do in society. That'd help with getting rid of the BS that's spouted so often.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 10:22 AM
1

Heh, I've been arguing for mens rights on here for nearly a decade, I know how pissed they can get. I agree that those arguing for their own supremacy aren't left wingers, but I was referring to those working class left wingers in trade unions etc who aren't massively concerned about the little details, they just want a better lifestyle for everyone. You do realise you posted most of this twice? And not to me? Let's keep it in one post, it's easier that way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/23 12:36 AM
3

You might not call them left wing but the rest of the world does, so they win the vote. So you're saying a smart left winger is a leftist, a dumb left winger is a centrist liberal? So there are absolutely NO dumb leftists? At all? Really? I'd say all those who throw men's issues under the bus are pretty dumb left wingers. I think you need to spend a bit more time in reality. The idea that "My side doesn't have anyone dumb, if they are dumb they aren't in MY group" is incredibly short-sighted. An…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/10/23 12:31 AM
3

I'd have described them more as useFUL idiots, seeing as they fulfilled a function, shouting down the opposition. You're trying to nitpick a point that doesn't exist there, Orwell didn't describe them as such. I've run into people making similar arguments previously, "These aren't real left wingers", the no true Scotsman is strong with them, they'd undoubtedly deny that you were left wing yourselves. Going by current standards, left wingers are those who say they are left wing. Trying to carve o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 10:16 PM
8

There's definitely a lack of anyone thinking about this, but there's also a very very toxic attitude pervading the left when it comes to critiquing/challenging ideas like it. It's easy to see that there are serious flaws in the whole concept of patriarchy, and in the "men are responsible for all the bad things that happen", but if you try to talk about those flaws you become an instant target for the left, and especially for those "intellectual" lefties the two posts at the top are lauding. Prob…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 03:19 AM
8

And it's that attitude that's driving people away from the left. Sure there's more activists and teachers but it's alienating so many others, both those directly affected [white men] and people who can see what's going on and don't trust anyone doing that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 12:51 AM
3

This is your politics in denial. It's the left, the left you supposedly support and it is a majority of the left, as you said. You can go all ivory-tower about it, talking about theories etc, but the average left-winger is a relatively low-paid wage earner trying to support a family. You can deny that it's the left supporting the anti-men attitude, but the facts and numbers involved give the lie to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/23 12:42 AM
5

The creators of the Duluth model have a lot to answer for.
/r/MensRights22/10/23 04:51 AM
1

You're the one talking about ejecting someone into the sun, and I'm the one you think has a poor argument? If you're not arguing based on what you think then wth are you doing? Trolling it seems. Since you were talking about solar incidents in your post you're going to have to state your "question" again, trying to guess what you actually mean is becoming tiresome.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/10/23 12:20 AM
1

It's part of a package deal. We need to identify what men need to be healthy, and push for this to be socially acceptable. Being able to vent emotions is one of those things, so first we argue that we need to be able to open up, then we argue that society has no right to deny that to us. Turning round saying "people don't like us doing that so we should stop" is giving up.
/r/MensRights20/10/23 08:42 PM
1

This is why we need to start arguing for more prosecutions for perjury or attempting to pervert the course of justice. And yes, this is exactly where we are now, people can make any allegations they like, the police are required to hear the complaint, the DA or CPS decide on whether to charge or not.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 08:03 PM
0

You can take that position, but the purpose of a suspension is to separate any aggrieved parties, to protect the student body, and to protect the person suspended and to allow investigation into any accusations. This is not assuming anything. In the eyes of the law, and the eyes of the students and their legal representatives, a criminal charge would be more than enough to start asking "what have you done to protect my client?" If they believe he is guilty that would lead to expulsion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 07:58 PM
0

No, I'm saying HE should have the choice to do what HE wants to do. You're saying he shouldn't. It's up to him if he wants to return, the university shouldn't get that option.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 07:52 PM
0

Of course. Are you saying that a school has to wait for a guilty verdict before being allowed to keep someone off campus? That's half the entire point of a suspension, to protect the rest of the students.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:08 PM
0

He is criminally charged with rape. After those charges are made the school decides to suspend him. How is that unreasonable, I really would like you to explain that. "literally, legally, and factually unreasonable"
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:04 PM
0

That's a serious amount of downvotes, do people not bother to read what the actual discussion is in here anymore? When you haven't explained your position adequately adding in a level of sarcasm is not going to help. "My first post" was about the school expelling him [presumably] after criminal charges were brought against him. My argument in this post is that he was in a great position before the accusations were made. They were found to be false, or at least he was found not guilty, so the sch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/10/23 06:00 PM
-13

You missed the point entirely. He was at uni, a record setting QB. Going back would potentially put him back in that position again. Not going back means he's on track to work at McDonalds with no degree either. If you can't understand that my point was made to give him choices, then that's on you. If you think I'm arguing against fair and just treatment for men, then you really have a reading problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 10:29 PM
-21

Already explained your first question. If he doesn't want to go back that's up to him, he should have the choice though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 09:46 PM
-18

Before or after the charges were made? If after then it would seem reasonable, also Title IX is [mostly] seen as a quasi-judicial process so having a hearing could be prejudicial to the court case. Same way civil cases have to take a back seat to criminal cases. The real issue imo is that after the case was resolved he should then either be fully re-instated at the university or then have a Title IX case to determine his position there. This would more likely be a positive outcome with a not-gui…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 07:52 PM
-16

I'm missing the point here, he was criminally charged and acquitted. There was no Title IX accusation made to the university described in the article, so he didn't need to defend himself against that. The ability to make a statement about a charge is part of the arrerst/trial process, so how does not having a Title IX interview hurt him?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 06:55 PM
11

https://archive.ph/wip/W0Cxv give it ten minutes from post time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/23 06:46 PM
2

We do not know why she is seeking to minimize this time further. Because she is a bitch. She couldn't keep her legs together so he divorced her. To get revenge for that, for being a shitty wife, she's doing her best to fuck his life up. This post highlights by example the discrimination men are facing in the courts, and how it impacts their lives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/23 12:06 AM
5

Almost everyone marries for love. Funny then how when the divorce papers come through both say "worst mistake of my life". it's easy to find women who won't do this or change their mind. Uhuh.
/r/MensRights17/10/23 11:23 PM
5

I used to accept the "some feminists are fair, even though most aren't" argument. Then I realised the narrative is so pervasive in feminism, that men are bad, men are evil, patriarchy hurts women [but we didn't call it patriarchy to have a go at men, honest!] and that toxic masculinity is responsible for all of societies ills, rather than the toxic attitude towards families that feminism demonstates. Everything feminism targets is directly or indirectly aimed at men, and it's been this way more …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/23 02:32 AM
25

Maybe he can reflect on his support of the system that was used to crucify him. [I find it hard to believe that a male teacher would get a post at an all-female school without some serious bending of the knee]. And no, I'm not saying that justifies any of this, just that the feminist ideology persists because men support it, it's time they stopped.
/r/MensRights16/10/23 09:59 PM
14

Yeah, if you have male kids in this toxic atmosphere you need to ensure they are being treated decently.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 06:18 PM
13

Pretty clueless, most likely. When they say down with patriarchy they are talking about you and all those like you. Feminists claim "they don't mean men" when they say patriarchy, but that's plainly a lie. It'd be interesting to stop sacrificing for them, and see how things change. I suspect you're not willilng to do that, but I'm not sure how else you can show them what you are doing for them. Suggest that the missus gets a job to help out? Maybe suggest that she should plan to do that once the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/23 06:05 PM
6

A couple of years old but has a couple of points to make: She agreed to pay him alimony: $1,000 a month for more than a year. I think most men paying alimony would be overjoyed to only be paying $12k or thereabouts. Instead of stepping up at home, the husbands leaned way back . . . and then, when it all ended, demanded the right to maintain their lifestyle. This sound familiar to anyone?
/r/MensRights14/10/23 03:42 AM
20

Unfortunately that's not how it plays out. fem: men abuse kids more man: that's not true, where's your proof? fem: we know it happens, I'm not doing the labour for you crowd: yeah, see, men abuse kids more. We DON'T get the benefit of innocent until proven guilty, and we don't get the benefit of normal debate rules either.
/r/MensRights12/10/23 09:40 PM
13

Feminists are the ones who got us here. The stated goal might be equality, or equity nowadays, but the actual demonstrated goal is oppression. Once they fix their own problems then it might be worth looking at in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/23 06:48 PM
7

Momoa didn't testify. I agree the case is done and over with, we know what happened and trying to revisit it to rewrite the results is pointless.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:15 PM
-2

You're not reading what I'm writing. I didn't say women are better parents than men. I said if it came to a question of "instinct", who would be the one the court decided was more instinctive. Now go back and read the reply again.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:58 PM
-2

You're the one using emojis, and you're calling me ridiculous? Ok. The minute I became a dad I just knew what to do, Just showing you what utter crap you were talking there. It wouldn't be too bad but you went on to compound it: i personally found it very easy to figure out what my kids needed and when even as newborns. It so happens that I support men getting shared custody, but as I said earlier, your argument is so wooly and up in the air it'd easily be co-opted by solicitors representing wom…
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:51 PM
-1

Yeah, I'm sure you followed guidelines on inspecting the baby for immediate problems, knew exactly when to tie off/cut the umbilical cord, knew what help the mother would need, observed the kid to ensure its breathing was fine, knew the reasons why the babies weight is so important, etc. Ever heard of midwives? That's their job. So yeah, education and training is damn essential. Then you have health visitors, people who follow up for a few years after the birth. "It's just instinctive".. balls.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 09:38 PM
1

Imo his argument carries water, training to be a parent can be obtained ofc, they are doing classes in it nowadays. Arguing that being a parent is an "instinct" is much much more likely to come down in favour of the mother. I'm less convinced by the idea that family court pays attention to how good a parent someone would be.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 08:18 PM
3

Yup, but this is where it starts, with a study that shows the previous bunch of experts were charlatans, or at best didn't understand boys. With a solid foundation like that it's possible to move forward as above.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 03:34 PM
6

Obviously we need someone who understands boys and mens psyche to create a plan that does work for them. Then we can compare and contrast how badly this current crop of "experts" have screwed the pooch.
/r/MensRights10/10/23 01:56 PM
1

Only if they are idiots, and yes, that means it has come up in the past as an argument. The ingroup is just a matter of liking certain people more than others. Call it bias if you prefer, it's not an overriding priority, it just colours their choices.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/10/23 01:45 PM
2

Iirc 19% of Americans identified as feminists in the last study, the lowest it's been this century. An easy mistake to make is thinking what you see online is what the reality is, it isn't. Just because there's a ton of feminist supporters on reddit doesn't mean they have the same support in every day life. If this carries on dropping the way it has been, then feminism might end up a non-factor in politics, which will be a great day for all of us.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 05:01 PM
1

Turned on and off? No, it's a factor, like most things, it's always there. Whether it's strong enough to outweigh the current issue of the day is another matter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 04:58 PM
3

women are physically weaker and them possessing this social privilege is only fair. A strange take there, imo if they want some form of power then they should earn it. In your funeral above I assumed Zeinab was the name of the woman being buried, if you're talking about someone who was responsible for your religious faith being structured then all the more reason she'd be honoured for that rather than being just another woman. I accept that news stories about men tend not to make the papers, tho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 03:28 AM
2

There's a few holes here. You say the daughter of a hero was being buried, and that the attitude showed respect to women, when it could easily be respect to the war hero. I'm not aware of any men being beaten for being inappropriately dressed. No matter though, social power might be demonstrated if you could show someone not being punished where they usually would be. I'm not trying to say men do well at the expense of women either, but the general appearance would indicate men do have it better…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 02:25 AM
4

I seem to recall a girl being severely beaten recently because she was inappropriately dressed. I don't pay any heed to feminists, because this is where they should be active. Not making up BS about patriarchy etc. But this might be more relevant, a girl beaten to death for refusing to sing a pro-regime song.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/10/23 01:33 AM
20

It's more likely that the many many years of antagonism between Israel and the other countries outweighs any common feeling women might otherwise express. Or they know if they show disapproval then they might end up getting punished for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/10/23 07:24 PM
2

I think you'll find a lot of people in here used to be feminists. It's not just men who've suffered at the hands of feminism, it's also those who realised it is full of bias, discrimination and bigotry. And we do get a few walk-ons who saw the discussions in the wild and wanted to take a look. As for feminism, its support is as low as it has ever been since WW1. Even if what they were saying weren't a pack of lies, most of them are so unlikeable in the way they come across they drive people away…
/r/MensRights08/10/23 04:54 PM
14

That's fine, until they hit on a guy who's just received his divorce papers. The one guy who normally is absolutely fine, but today he's been kicked in the balls so hard his life will never recover. Then along comes shithead-feminist and winds him up until he blows. He ends up banned when he needs the help, and we end up with the admins on our necks. Tolerating those parasites acting up in here will come at a cost to us, one I don't think we should be happy to pay.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 03:13 AM
25

There's an example of one right here on this thread.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:49 AM
22

anti feminist chauvinist time and energy blaming females These are not the same thing. Feminists are both men and women, hating feminists is not the same as hating women. Though usually a feminist will do their level best to tell you it is.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:42 AM
14

Oh they are here, like fleas, but here they haven't got the support of the larger community or the mods. It makes them a little nervous, less prone to spouting off.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:39 AM
22

That's the difference between them and us. Just so long as we don't let them beat us to death with it.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:38 AM
18

There's been a rise of replies that are hostile towards men, though I haven't seen an increase in posts as yet. And those replies are getting more virulent, people trying to justify completely untenable positions because it suits their politics, when previously they'd take a response and just leave it at that.
/r/MensRights08/10/23 12:34 AM
2

Maybe she should consider that her putting effort into looking good has made him think he should make some effort, and is being nicer to her?
/r/MensRights07/10/23 06:02 PM
4

Same as in a lot of areas, eg. college applications. Women are at over 60% in college placements, and are still arguing that they are discriminated against and need more assistance to get to college.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:53 PM
2

Apparently not, according to the government and feminists.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:45 PM
2

The petition closes down automatically after a response, or I assume a certain amount of time. When I say the "feminist locked it down", I'm referring to the criminal Act in the first place. In theory, men and women are treated the same. Same sentence limits for rape. It's how they are applied that makes the difference. I haven't ever seen a woman get the maximum sentence for rape, the modifiers get implemented to a much stronger degree, and I think they are discriminatory towards a woman lookin…
/r/MensRights07/10/23 05:41 PM
3

Heh, had a "discussion" with someone the other day about terfs. He was trying his best to convince me that terfs were right wing, despite feminist being in the name. He was so desperate to disavow terfs, they really screw up the political alignments.
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:25 AM
55

Am I missing something here? Why would we try to defend this fair? It's blatantly misandrist, and provides an excellent example of an answer for when feminists ask "how are women privileged nowadays?"
/r/MensRights07/10/23 04:22 AM
16

Actually no. Not in the UK, and yes, we've complained about it. The feminists locked it down. It's a git, but media can't describe women as rapists without risking being sued.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 11:14 PM
9

Better than the writeup on the BBC or the Guardian: 404 not found.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 11:11 PM
19

This is interesting, but a touch like trying to put a plaster on the hole in the dam. He wants to teach young men how to take the risk of rejection, rather than teaching women to take the first step. A bit petty, at last this shows that someone is actually noticing, but they are still unsurprisingly trying to put men into the firing line.
/r/MensRights06/10/23 07:35 PM
0

OP is referring to rape culture as a means to control women. I hadn't honestly thought there'd be anyone around to call out rape against men, it seems such a rarity for that to be brought up. Of course it's evil as hell, I'm just [pleasantly] surprised someone mentioned it.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/23 02:23 AM
2

From the perspective of western civilisation Patriarchy : myth created to keep feminists in a job. Rape Culture : nope. Systemic Misogyny : nope. Male Domination : not a clue what you mean by this. Male Privilege : Hah. No. Female Oppression nope. Systemic male violence against women : nope.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/10/23 01:33 AM
20

10 years inside, suspended for 8 months, sentence to be carried out after the suspension. We can dream.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 12:10 AM
9

"You're either with us or against us". Well, I'm certainly not with you, what you want to believe after that is your own affair.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/10/23 10:03 PM
-2

Ok, come up with something that will stop knife criime, or at least slow it down to the same level over the next 5 years. We can't just complain about it and ignore the actual problem of people getting stabbed.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 11:09 PM
21

This has been an anti-feminist sub for quite a while. Thank fuck.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 04:02 PM
4

15 is a kid. Defined so because there are still girls who haven't hit puberty at that age. So from societies point of view, they can't call them women at that age. So yeah, still a girl.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:58 PM
-9

"Some of you may die so that my rights are kept safe, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make" Shrek ftw.
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:54 PM
2

The problem is, sure stop and search is biased, probably racist at heart, but if it's driving down knife crime then don't they have a responsibility to keep doing it? Dealing with the factors causing gang crime in the first place is likely to take several years if not decades, so do we just ignore all the kids killed in the meantime? It isn't an either-or situation like you suggested. We can do both. Personally, I'd go with an ageist approach, stop and search any groups 3+ of kids under 21 at ra…
/r/MensRights03/10/23 03:53 PM
3

If the whole idea is that we break the gender rules for men, then get told we have to behave in a certain way, dress in a certain way, then wtf is the point of it all?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/10/23 06:13 PM
9

Then you get all the feminists moaning, saying you're equating it to FGM. Cue the hour or two of "I'm not trying to belittle FGM" aggro, by the time that's over with the thread has moved on.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:30 AM
7

If a woman insists you get circumcised before having sex with her then throw her back and start looking again, this one isn't worth it. Last time I heard about something like that, the guy got cut, and she cheated on him while he was healing up. It's not worth it.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:24 AM
13

People can do what they want under their own religion. A baby boy has not decided to exercise his own religious freedom, odds are he won't know what he actually wants until much later in life. Parents do not have the right to enforce a harmful cosmetic procedure on thier kids.
/r/MensRights02/10/23 02:21 AM
2

"Real men" translates as "What I want you to do". This almost always comes from women so the simple response is "how would you ever know?"
/r/MensRights02/10/23 12:56 AM
21

Teach feminists to stop killing their babies.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 08:34 PM
11

No. They've had the benefit of the doubt previously, and spat on it. If a feminist is honestly arguing for real equality then let's hear them speak, not just assume they are "one of the good ones". Until then I'll assume that they are one of the pack.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 03:14 PM
6

I'd argue for a higher rate, based on the incredible effectiveness of the accusation to do what's desired of it, the comparative lack of any negative outcomes for the accuser, the prevailing social support [and in some cases financial support] available to her, and the way that it can be done informally with great effect. You can certainly start with that rate, but these all combine to make a false accusation much more enticing for the accuser.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 03:02 PM
8

I think it's time they earned our trust back. Most people here have been screwed over by feminists, let's see something positive for us from them before we start turning the other cheek.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 02:49 PM
15

2-8% of rape cases get proven in court. "Rape is epidemic!!" 2-8% of false allegations get proven in court. "False allegations almost never happen". The concept that false allegations are very rare is based on the numbers of proven-guilty court cases. It's very convenient that most prosecutors don't want to upset the feminists, so they never get to court, or the usual prosecution run-around happens, plea bargaining, reducing sentences until it has no effect. "2 weeks probation" type thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 02:46 PM
24

Helping a woman claiming to be in distress? Damn right he won't.
/r/MensRights01/10/23 03:40 AM
0

Missed this reply somehow, sorry. I'm sure you believe the men and women should have equals rights. That's a Feminist belief I certainly do, and I'll be ever so happy when men get the same rights as women. Most feminists seem not to be interested in equalling things up though. The BS I was referring to was CRT and BLM, but let's go with this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/10/23 02:53 AM
3

Like I said, the rest of the article went out of its way to show how she was mean-spirited and not the sweet poster child the defence lawyer made her out to be, so I don't think they are trying to portray her in any positive light here.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:40 PM
9

I think random in this sense was "not provoked or caused by the victim in any way". There's plenty of comments in the article about how terrible she was prior to the attack.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 04:26 PM
7

There's been plenty of men harmed and killed by women they were in relationships with. Bobbit ring a bell? Women are well represented in the DV sweepstakes. As usual it's just a soundbite that sounds great in the media but when you look at it it's just another load of crap.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 09:28 PM
11

Nah, that's just attempted gatekeeping. I'm all for a social safety net, universal healthcare free at the point of use, for improving the lot of people at the bottom of the ladder etc, but feminism is counter to most of that, crt and blm can go swing, and I've no idea what you're referring to with disability studies. I DO NOT have to support all that bullshit to be left-wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 06:53 PM
14

That's what you describe as "conservative rhetoric". Maybe it's a UK thing but I agree totally with his comments, feminism is toxic towards men and boys, the concept of patriarchy is a myth that has been developed to justify hatred and bigotry towards men. Feminism absolutely is a hate movement. They don't directly commit violence, they'll happily support it if they see it but it's more about political and social hate and isolation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/09/23 06:47 PM
8

What idiot decided that universities should be courts in the first place? They should be judging whether a piece of work was plagiarised, whether cheating occured in an exam, not ruling on sexual assault matters.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 06:14 PM
3

Except to point out insults based on sexuality is the same as calling a woman a slut, and doing that is being a huge hypocrite.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 03:00 PM
3

"True feminists". Real feminists, who believe what I do and don't believe what I don't. Oh if they don't do that then they aren't true feminists. Because I'm the one true feminist. Honest. The problem with expecting right wingers to die off is that more are being created all the time. Mostly by really crap left wing policies that force people to think "nope" and walk away from it. And at times very recently the right wing surge has been greater than the left wing kiddie recruiting. I'm sure left…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/09/23 02:20 AM
7

This reads very much like that saying "if you want to stab someone in the back, you have to get behind them first". Women absolutely do have reproductive rights, if you hadn't noticed it's men who seem not to have any. Maybe women don't have as many as you want them to have, but it's certainly more than men. The only thing that even remotely resembles a patriarchy in the west is what you wrote above, that women are short on rights. Poor babies, they aren't quite maxing out the advantages they ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 11:16 PM
3

One of the main issues I have with the left wing nowadays is that they are incapable of accepting any fault, of acknowledging any imperfection. Because the first step to improving yourself or your political party is to see where it's failing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 10:58 PM
2

It seems that when it comes to men’s issues the left are totally unwilling to advocate for them and the right are totally incompetent. The right-wing is harmful to men’s rights. Your comment assigns equal failure to both left and right, which imo is accurate. Your title says nothing about the left failing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 06:08 PM
3

Your conclusion doesn't fit your title.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/23 03:55 PM
9

"Real women" are pricing themselves out of the market, or just taking themselves out of the market for most men by themselves. The AI girlfriend is a replacement, a response to this. Better be careful though, the men might come to prefer the AI so when women lower their requirements to get a man [as they inevitably will] the men might not be interested.
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:15 PM
1

Ho hum, Cherry 2000 turning real. Who coulda seen it!!
/r/MensRights27/09/23 03:09 PM
-3

I don't have an issue with this. It's 2 adults, no different to prostitution imo, one pays the other to get off. Just because I don't understand how being abused like that is sexually exciting to the payee doesn't mean it's not real for them.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 08:36 PM
1

Don't try to do too much or you'll burn yourself out. Be kind to those around you, if opportunities come up to help more without compromising yourself, then have at it.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 05:18 AM
5

I don't hate all women for the actions of some of them, I don't hate all men even though some men also support policies that are inherently biased against men. I do despise feminism for what they have done to society, and no longer find any reason to try to be interested in the direction they are taking it. If I had kids it'd be a different matter, but it's all going to go to shit in 20-30 years, but I'll be gone by then. I do feel sorry for the younger ones who have all this to face, which is p…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 06:33 PM
3

Do what you want to do. If they want to fuck around in the meantime, that's up to them.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 11:41 AM
1

Nah, I've been depressed enough seeing a video of a baby being circumcised, and then seeing people argue that it's "all about religious freedom", no one asked the baby what he believed, though the most likely answer would be "I believe that part of me you just cut off should have been left alone" and "I believed you loved me. How could you do this?". Considering the number of times a baby has had his penis permanently damaged or amputated, I suspect those involved should be paying a lot more att…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:13 PM
1

How exactly is it "more complex"? And let's ignore the differences in analgesia, when babies aren't given any.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 05:57 PM
11

Check it, the study you based your claim on got withdrawn.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 12:18 AM
5

Sorry, but it's a tenet of my religious beliefs that you need to have your penis amputated. C'mon, it won't take long.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:28 PM
10

I don't think it's more damaging for an adult, it's just that they can complain about the pain more. So-called compassionate people seem to be able to ignore a baby screaming in pain somehow.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:24 PM
14

If you fake the results of the study, or forget to include relevant parameters, then sure.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:22 PM
1

I'm fully aware of the history. Which is why I said there's no connection to Christianity, it's a Judaism thing, and encouraged for Muslims afaik.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:19 PM
2

Wtf? There's no links between Chrisitianity and circumcision, at least not with any of the mainstream versions of it. Just beware of leaving any kids with the family if that's how they see it. Yeah, we're a long way from that.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 11:13 PM
14

Whatever that means. Can we assume you're not going to be talking to the people in /r/TwoXChromosomes about misandry?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/23 10:13 PM
18

There's a very strong connection between feminism and misandry. It's not 100%, but the polarisation of viewpoints means if you support feminism most of the time you won't support mens rights, and vice versa. For example I think you'll find most of 2XC call themselves feminists, and if you post in there asking about mens rights you'll most likely get banned. There's been plenty of posts about menslib in /r/mensrights, with examples of misandry especially by the mods there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/09/23 08:41 PM
10

Men wanting custody are told by lawyers that fighting for it is a very expensive losing battle, which when they are already on the hook for alimony they can't afford. So most men go for the 2 days a fortnight without a court case. Then women say men don't want custody.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 06:08 PM
12

Sexism against men makes her just as sexist as anyone she complains about. IF she wants "equality" then she has to accept that all sexism needs to end. And patriarchy doesn't exist, it's a myth, an illusion.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:29 PM
126

Surprisingly the responses were mostly positive. Just that one who backpedalled a bit in a response, but still managed to imply a certain amount of misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:37 AM
3

VAWG sends a clear message that the safety, wellbeing and lives of men and boys, and gay women, are secondary to heterosexual women and girls. Absolutely correct. In other words, it's working exactly as intended. I find it hard to believe that someone educated in the issues of gendered violence and social politics could come up with something quite so bad, so unfit for purpose. Either they are totally incompetent, or they have a different motive. I know the common saying is to assume stupidity r…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 12:20 AM
8

Just a quick note, I'm not reading the full article. I did find it curious that she mentioned a man writing a letter to a judge about a rapists good character, but completely forgot to mention that a woman wrote it as well. Typical biased Guardian crap.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:46 PM
3

I can't imagine any men not doing this in future, even a £10k debt will be better than losing the benefits of an Oxbridge education, the connections you make there, and the loss of the lifetime earnings you wouldn't make in future. And it's egregious how they try to phrase it as accuser vs defendant, when in reality it's defendant vs the whole of the academic legal process. If they were to get rid of their HR professionals and people trained in this area and let a few students try to run it then…
/r/MensRights17/09/23 11:39 PM
14

Men get groped at work, or outside, but they don't get any recognition for it. This is a privilege for women, to have her complaints recognised and acted on. And women get sexually assaulted in prison, that's a strange argument to make.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:11 PM
17

An easier answer is "what percentage of men or women are CEOs or politicians?" When you're talking about hundredths of 1 percent, you realise how trivial their argument is.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 07:07 PM
11

They want the ability to harm someone else [get them kicked out of a university] without any form of opposition or consequence. We haven't quite got as bad as the US by banning this, and with any luck we won't. She mentioned a study that claims 1 in 4 women at the uni get sexually assaulted. I hope that gets VERY stringent checks when it gets published.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 06:55 PM
6

The sister and other women in the community are already mentoring the girls in their daily lives. The boys end up being neglected, as shown by countless studies over the last couple of decades. If he takes on more work it means less time available for the boys, to support the girls who already have plenty of support. You are getting downvoted because you can't see that simple truth, and because you're trying to shame people into upvoting you, which is kinda weird tbh.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:34 PM
6

"not to say that women won't do it to men either" FTFY. Being blind to sexual assault instigated by women is thankfully becoming a thing of the past. The fundamental problem lies in "people getting squashed against each other becuase there aren't enough carriages", also making sexual assault easier and more covert. From a mans perspective I'd rather not be crushed up against anyone. So putting more carriages on seems like the straightforward answer, not demonstrate privilege yet again by having …
/r/MensRights17/09/23 02:26 AM
3

I'd say everyone gets groped. Why put on "womens carriages" when it's obvious that they need many more carriages for everyone?
/r/MensRights17/09/23 12:31 AM
0

I think that just highlights the type of porn you like.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 12:24 AM
2

We need a big board of privilege. Tack em all up when we find them, like this one.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 12:24 AM
2

Because if the argument is not about how badly women are treated, the argument is a bad one. But that's their perspective, as far as I'm concerned so long as I can back up what I'm talking about I'm good to go. For the education argument, if a man says men don't need higher education, challenge them on their own education. Odds are they'll be ex-university with that perspective, so they have to concede the point or be damned as a hypocrite. You can find a ton of sources and attractively presente…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 01:35 AM
3

So you're saying 9-11 was justified? We're not in the 90s anymore, Americans have seen the problems caused by funding terrorism and the IRA has never been so broke. It certainly does sound like you're inciting violence. It's an insane take, because we're not talking about a foreign invasion, or a government we don't agree with, or even the same government trying to push around certain areas of our contries. You're talking about taking up arms against feminists. Now I'd consider it for antifa, th…
/r/MensRights15/09/23 01:20 AM
4

I've already differentiated between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour when I referred to suffragists. It's interesting that everyone refers to the extremist lunatics as "good women" of the 1900s, instead of those who were actually wanting to sit down and talk about it.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:47 AM
4

We can make all the factual points we want, thetinmenblogs does it every day, but that is not going to get us better treatment on its own. We need people to see how the system is against us, but we also need them to see how they are against us just with their normal attitudes. Without that we're not changing anything.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 12:43 AM
1

The funny part of this was it was the right wing that actually fought to keep it the way it is now. There'd been a lot of talk about women being drafted, and it made its way into a bill, but the conservatives argued to drop it out, and ended up conceding in other areas to get rid of it.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:59 PM
5

We really need to argue the extent of misogyny, nowadays disagreeing with someone can be called misogyny, and it gets used all over the place as an "I win" card. If you see it being used as a gotcha when there's only a trivial argument for it, slap it down. Half the battle we face is being treated as fairly and equally as women, we won't get that when they can claim just about any comment as offensive.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:51 PM
2

Go after their argument at the roots. focusing on men (who are already extremely privileged) Ask them how men are privileged, with the education gap, the empathy gap, the justice gap. Don't forget to point out how the wage gap is a myth. Their whole argument hinges on "men are treated better by society". When you point out that's crap, they have nothing left to argue.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:45 PM
2

Terrorism has always been bad. And sending bombs through the post has always been terrorism. Suffragists, fine, always. Suffragettes, terrorists. It's amazing how many so called sources fail to mention their bombing campaign.
/r/MensRights14/09/23 11:40 PM
1

Fighting against men should be separated from this imo. I certainly agree with the principle, but the whole women and fights needs to be specifically defined. It's too easy to mess someone up with a garbled message.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 11:42 PM
4

That's the thing though, "never put your hands on a woman EXCEPT for self defence". And "never hit a lady", but a lady is someone who would never use violence in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 09:03 PM
0

No one should be getting called incel, or slut or anything else for that matter. I abhor all the speech restrictions the progessive groups have put in place, and trying to weaponise it on our behalf is conceding that it's acceptable. As for hate speech, the situation as always is that laws are not made to protect men usually, unless there is "something wrong with them and they can't handle themselves". It's easy to see how hate speech laws are arguing that the "lesser versions of humanity" need …
/r/MensRights11/09/23 11:59 PM
4

Make sure you get custody. Otherwise that whole settlement will go on "child support".
/r/MensRights11/09/23 05:22 PM
13

Does no one remember Klinger from MASH?
/r/MensRights11/09/23 04:02 PM
1

Consider the conern that you might be a serial killer who posts their kills on instagram a yellow flag. Violating your privacy like that would be the red flag, walk away.
/r/MensRights11/09/23 03:21 PM
35

At the very best, the left is offering more of the same right now, as you say all they are doing to counter the flow is to moan at the men they are offering nothing to help. It reminds me of the pure screwups that let Trump in 2016, expecting people to vote for you as your right, while you offered nothing. That kind of elitism and pure arrogance will lose elections.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/09/23 08:28 PM
13

Just to bring the moronic up to speed, he's talking about consensual sex, being turned into a false accusation at a later date.
/r/MensRights10/09/23 05:43 PM
20

When so many men have realised that they are not getting any help or support from feminism, yet don't want to accept that it's bullshit. There's no point posting anything because the responses don't mean anything useful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/09/23 05:46 PM
8

You can guarantee that someone will have been listening to all this thinking "this is a way to take down patriarchy". If this gets any traction we need to make it very clear that feminist dogma doesn't carry weight in the ministry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/23 11:32 PM
5

For paywall sufferers.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/09/23 11:29 PM
1

I think a blanket wrap with arm and leg restraints on the inside and appropriate re-sizing flap with seatbelt attachments going around the outside might work better, you wouldn't need extra pieces and could easily work with 2 officers. The only question is do you want to cover the head or not, covering it is more complicated.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/23 09:31 PM
3

Apart from how many officers and how long did it take to get it on? Something where you put it on the floor, roll someone up in it might be a better option, like the cat burrito.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/23 07:01 PM
8

I've tried to use these in discussions outside the sub and they are pretty effective, the only problem being finding the one you need for a particular topic. Reddit does not do a good indexing system.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 07:26 PM
1

Not a clue, did one? I can't imagine after WW2 that he had an awful lot of humanity left in him.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 08:58 PM
-2

I'm talking about your own humanity. The last group to follow your advice seriously ended up singing Deutschland Über Alles after a few years. And no, I'm not calling you anything or suggesting anything, just saying that's how it goes.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 08:32 PM
-6

Sorry, but they are human even if twisted and evil. Never de-humanise your enemies, doing that erodes your own humanity.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 03:11 PM
11

Not everything bad happening to men is feminism's fault. But they do like to get in the way of men finding solutions for their own problems, and they do like making new problems to plague men with.
/r/MensRights30/08/23 03:07 PM
9

Of ALL the issues surrounding this case, this was the one they decided to write an article about?
/r/MensRights23/08/23 04:00 PM
1

Thanks. It does look a bit off, though that might be the crap music. One guy seems to be doing a haka. I might be completely off target with this, but I think it demonstrates a significant difference between the sexes, women cry when life goes wrong, men get angry instead.
/r/MensRights23/08/23 02:38 PM
8

So there's evidence of bias due to anti-male sexism, yet they have done and are doing nothing about it? Proof we are living in a Patriarchy!!
/r/MensRights22/08/23 08:00 PM
8

How about linking the video?
/r/MensRights21/08/23 04:05 PM
15

Look up how the Violence Against Women and Girls Act works. Girl hits a boy, it gets recorded under that act.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:21 PM
3

Feminism has existed well over a century now and has been pushed relentlessly since the 70s, 50 years ago. That's plenty of time for it to seep into popular conciousness, especially considering the lack of opposition to it. When it comes to someone trying to wave a page of stats at me that they've massaged to within an inch of their lives, I'll take something I know for a fact and have seen over it any day of the week. There are very few feminists supporting mens rights. There seem to be an awfu…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 08:13 PM
3

Actually most people here come by their beliefs honestly. You'll find feminists are brought up that way, gurl power and all that as a kid, and even more so moving on into adulthood. Mens rights don't get the same foundation, it usually takes a personal event, either the person involved or someone close to them, falling very foul of the political dominance that feminism has for them to realise how bad things have got. Which is bad from a recruiting point of view, but very good from a "we don't ge…
/r/MensRights18/08/23 07:23 PM
3

The problem when someone is completely deluded and believes in a mythical force that you have to take on faith that it exists is that there's absolutely no way to convince them that they are deluded. They will always come back at you with an argument that they think is solid, but in reality depends on the unfounded belief in that force. This problem exists in all religions, Christianity/Judaism/Muslim, and more modern ones including feminism. If a theory doesn't fit reality, then that theory is …
/r/MensRights18/08/23 06:36 PM
5

Because patriarchy and toxic masculinity is the reason people ignore male victims. Nah, it's because no one cares less about them, while all the attention goes to female victims, as propogated by world media. Unless you're saying solidly left-wing journos are rife with the patriarchy?
/r/MensRights18/08/23 05:52 PM
7

Because when they take their clothes off people pay attention to them. Even if what they are showing is not all that impressive.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 02:14 PM
2

So it's made up bullshit? ok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/08/23 01:34 PM
1

What team what league is that in? If it's not the NHL then you've not made your point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/23 10:30 PM
1

except for all those times when women DO play in the mens teams Like where? Name any significant sport that has any kind of international following where women compete with the men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/23 09:13 PM
4

There was a video on here about this a while back, they mentioned that there was a disclaimer somewhere in the strategy which mentions men and boys just as a sidenote. Problem is that it allows statisticians to count violence against men and boys as being covered by the VAWG strategy. So violence against men and boys inflates the numbers for the VAWG crew. And obviously, because they are covered by the VAWG strategy there's no need for a separate VAMB strategy.
/r/MensRights15/08/23 03:52 PM
2

That's the whole point of women's sports, so that they have somewhere to compete against each other. Purely and simply because they are unable to compete at the men's level. One of the very few times I'll agree with feminists, it's not sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/08/23 01:59 PM
22

It's the same as women being excluded from male sports. They aren't at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/23 10:57 PM
5

The way they do already?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:28 PM
11

Wtf would you stand by an active pedophile?
/r/MensRights14/08/23 02:26 PM
11

When convicted male rapists go away for a long time. Female rapists.. not so much.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 02:06 PM
82

Pure projection. Block her and move on, if nothing else it'll drive her insane.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:18 PM
5

Because it's not talking directly about their problems. And if you aren't talking about their problems then you are harming the cause. Why else would someone go on national tv and say "Women are the primary victims of war"?
/r/MensRights12/08/23 02:14 PM
2

Is concerned about never being hired again. Stresses her multiple mental health issues. Pure genius.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/08/23 07:57 PM
10

Sooner or later you get to the "fuck it" position, where you're done worrying about how other people think of you. The reason for the disclaimers in most cases is because if you don't address it, that will undoubtedly be the first thing you hear about in the comments. 99% of deaths in war are men hmm, but what about the women? I don't feel apologetic at all when making a point, I'll often feel irritated "this is so damn obvious, why can't you see, are you illiterate??" but I've talked to too man…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 03:08 PM
4

There are a variety of ways that men are treated badly nowadays, this is just one of them. One of the bigger problems is that men are not seen as consumers, "women hold the purse strings" so men get poorly treated by vendors, in the media etc. The way to deal with that is simple. Take control of your own household finances. Remind these companies that men do have a say and will bury them if they go out of their way to piss them off. Gillette certainly got that message, I don't think they've reco…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/23 02:57 PM
25

Listening to that litany of backlash against mens rights was a real kick in the nuts. I was hoping that by now people would have realised that we have real problems and deserve some help, not the scorn and abuse shown there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/08/23 03:54 PM
4

Ahh, that explains it ofc, thanks.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/23 01:58 PM
4

I thought I recognised this.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 01:48 PM
0

She's definitely appalling, though not everything she says is complete BS. I didn't realise OP had come out with his sexual body count?
/r/PussyPassDenied08/08/23 03:22 AM
25

I'm missing the pussypass in this one? If anything she tries to give men a pass with the "doesn't matter what his body count is"
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 11:19 PM
0

No I wouldn't, I'm not anti-cop, or anti firearms/tasers, but this was egregious. You need to watch it again, 2:40. His hands are never out of sight, and he was slowly stepping back, hands still in view. He couldn't be less threatening. And then they shot him.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 09:46 PM
1

Balls. You do realise it's 10 seconds from him opening the door to when he got shot? And the last 3 seconds was after he stepped back and lowered his hands. If it was 4 seconds from the door opening I could understand it. No one was in a state of surprise, this was a deliberate tasing to show a threat, not for self defence.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 09:31 PM
-1

They can clearly see his hands. He's not moving his hands in any way to indicate he's going for a gun they can't see. They are not moving in any way to show they are concerned about being shot at. What happened was that she pissed them off so much they wanted to shoot her, but couldn't. So they shot him instead.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 06:18 PM
7

Sure, so you take steps to find a way to get care for the kid. Murdering them should be the last thing on your mind. Unless.... The problem is that she really hated the kid, the screaming, the crying, the endless dirty nappies. So she shot the kid. THEN she decided she didn't want to go to jail. The suicide was the reaction to the murder.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 04:29 PM
18

It's the mental gymnastics to rationalise how a child killer is doing the best for her baby that amazes me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/23 03:58 PM
0

Ok, we can ask them over to your place for training camp.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 03:20 PM
-6

Obvious to anyone actually watching him, which the cops with the tasers were doing. They decided to tase him as soon as they saw him, which was why they were getting her to get out of the way to clear their line of fire. And they could see his hands right from the start until the moment they fired, they knew he wasn't armed.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 03:18 PM
-27

A bit quick? He was retreating into the apartment, hands in a non-threatening position when they tased him. Absolutely no need for that.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/08/23 01:31 AM
5

That woman who got the income adjusted senior space.. I wonder what the m/f split is on that?
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:26 PM
43

This is something that needs a professional study doing on it. The problem of course is that none of the "professionals" want to do a study on it, as most likely their findings would contradict the current narrative. 2-8% is laughably low compared to the anecdotal views of police officers, which range up to and over 50%. Remember, a false accusation is just that, an accusation made. It doesn't have to be in a court of law, it can be on social media, or to some form of law enforcement, police/FBI…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/23 02:58 PM
2

As a gamergate veteran it's almost an article of faith with me that there are no unbiased journalists left. I'd be very interested to see professional opinions on media organisations that would indicate otherwise.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:17 PM
6

I suspect a large element of this is that Indian police use batons/sticks on people regularly, and I would imagine they call that non-lethal, or not deadly force. I completely agree, sticks of various kinds, especially any with a point on it, are lethal as hell. If the judge disagrees then they should let the closest male family member of the dead man take 1 shot at him with a stick. See if he still believes it.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:23 PM
4

Ooh, 7:44, her true colours coming out.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/23 03:55 PM
9

"A stick is not a deadly weapon" "Woman accused of beating her husband to death" Seems these judges don't understand what deadly means.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 03:15 PM
28

I'd say possibly all men. It's a large part why men can't express themselves or discuss their feelings, because it's verbotten as you describe. ed in response to /u/BaconSoul You missed the bit where I said "a large part".The patriarchy concept is designed to harrass and silence men. Modern day oppression, if you like.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/23 11:17 PM
3

Not at all. The problem with the death penalty is that if you find evidence later proving innocence you can't say "oops, my bad" and it all be ok. And yes, we know that people have been executed while innocent. How'd you fancy that, or maybe someone you love being executed when innocent? The system you have right now is imperfect still, but it's a lot better than a convict today, hang em tomorrow one.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/23 11:11 PM
9

After someone has been in the hands of interrogators for 24 hours they'll confess to anything to make it stop. I was going to say video but even that can be faked now.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/08/23 03:23 PM
5

You've got a choice, don't co-habit in places that have those laws, don't get married in said places. It's not that hard not to move in together.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:59 PM
6

So don't live in those places.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:56 PM
6

These are the two milestones on which women are judged by other women. "Are you married" and "when is the baby due?" Once that's achieved she's completed her requirements to be a real woman [as defined by other women] so then she can relax and express the inner woman that's been there since day 1. I suspect this is the reason why women start to hear that ticking clock at 30, when men who don't want kids don't tend to change their minds, the clock is almost literally a wake up call.. "if you don'…
/r/MensRights30/07/23 01:54 PM
3

What do you mean? Perfect fantasy writing there.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 09:45 PM
-4

There's always one. We can reiterate the many issues with the US legal system if you want, or we can just agree not to insult a whole bloody country.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 08:51 PM
31

Arguable, the judge oversaw some bad mistakes and allowed them to stand, the police made several errors either accidentally or deliberately, but the prosecution must have been the driving force behind it all. I'd blame the QC first.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 08:47 PM
9

John the Baptist. Executed because Salome got Herod all hot and bothered, but Herod ordered it, so it's not Salome's fault. Honest. It's been the gameplan for many a miscarriage of justice over the years. Also see "behind every strong man is a strong woman" and "the power behind the throne".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 03:18 PM
5

Anything built over generations must have input from both men and women, it's impossible that it doesn't.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/07/23 03:11 PM
4

Wow, politicians will be rushing to get their camera time with this incredible news item.. they'll be diving in to spearhead this burning issue. They'll be here.. any day now, they'll be here.. Tumbleweed
/r/MensRights29/07/23 12:49 AM
2

And there you go, falling off the cliff.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 09:29 PM
1

Sure, kids are part of the reason for the decision as well, which doesn't detract from the people making that decision being men and women. Your position is getting less tenable by the minute.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 09:24 PM
3

So we're going to completely ignore the "protect the women and children" which has motivated men defending their homes since cave man times? Women had nothing at all to do with it? Nothing at all? Incredible.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 09:02 PM
6

50.5% of the world are women. In any country where votes are tallied, that means thay are more powerful and a majority over men. The US for example.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:24 PM
11

So what you are saying is that women should not be allowed into positions of authority to make decisions that might send men into danger? You know, like Queens, female Prime Ministers and even women "the power behind the throne" have done since time immemorial?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:21 PM
17

When recent studies show that violence committed by women against men is at a similar level to that committed on them, where are the shelters for men? Sure, I'm happy abused women get support when they need it, but how about the support for abused men?
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:18 PM
21

The Boko Haram kidnappings of 600 girls made world-wide headlines and politicians everywhere jumping on the bandwagon. No one gave a damn about the hundreds of boys who were murdered at the same time.
/r/MensRights28/07/23 03:12 PM
45

That's probably a domestic violence education course, not maths/English. But I love how they are phrasing it as if these are real tough penalties for burning someone to death.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 02:43 PM
5

YES yes, go with the kids on your own, he can have a week of peace. I'm sure the kids will be easy to care for at Disneyland, nothing's going to try to grab their attention every 30 seconds.
/r/MensRights27/07/23 01:56 AM
17

Nah. I don't see any reason to give anyone the benefit of the doubt nowadays with the political climate as it is. You're arguing to believe every accusation, while the standard is meant to be "innocent until proven guilty". If someone wants to make an accusation about someone else, they had better come with some proof.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 12:43 AM
18

As long as society is branding me as evil, I see no reason to risk my own skin to help someone else out. Aren't the majority of assaults leading to serious injury or death committed against men? If they actually wanted to do something about attacks on people, both men and women, then they'd increase the number of police officers on the beat. But that's against Khans ideology, so it's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:24 PM
4

Has she not looked in the mirror recently?
/r/MensRights24/07/23 07:44 PM
-5

Conscriptions have been going on since time immemorial. The archers at Agincourt were yeomen required to train with a bow, but I would be amazed if that was even close to the earliest conscription. The Navy used to have its press gang, just go round town kidnapping men to go to sea. As to who allowed it to be put into place in the US, I'd assume that was the founding fathers. They had a chance to equalise the situation back in 1918, but feminists went hard against allowing women to be conscripte…
/r/MensRights23/07/23 12:14 AM
8

Own it. And back it up. Ask them why they think it's ok for men to be conscripted, to get a second-rate education, or to get much worse sentences because they are male. Whichever is the topic you are best-informed about or most passionate about. "Damn right I am, why do you think it's ok for boys to get worse grades just because they are boys?"
/r/MensRights22/07/23 05:21 PM
74

Yeah, doesn't matter. They're the ones who want to "pay attention", if they want to argue and scream instead, who cares?
/r/MensRights22/07/23 01:46 PM
8

Over the past couple of years I've been trying to build bridges between here and the mensrights sub, this meltdown over the past week or two has probably blown that out of the water. Most users aren't particularly interested in who the mods are, so long as they let people get on with posting etc within reasonable requirements. What is it with people and discord servers? We're on reddit, if we wanted to go elsewhere we'd have gone to kbin and all the other alternatives. What matters is having an …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/23 03:23 AM
1

There's no reason to have to accept abuse from her. She's 30 years old, more than old enough to know how to behave and how not to.
/r/MensRights21/07/23 02:03 AM
9

Well, it's good to know that some people will be pleased with this situation. Feminists and others opposed to mens rights will be happy as hell this is going down. The entirety of the actions since the API issue came up have been self-defeating and will undoubtedly harm the state of mens rights advocacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/23 08:15 PM
5

Wouldn't this mean that all universities in that state that run the title 9 setup in a similar way are vulnerable to being sued?
/r/MensRights19/07/23 02:06 AM
9

You keep using that word, I'm not sure it means what you think it means.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 07:48 PM
3

It was aimed at me though, it was directed at men, making the assumption that I'm cheating on my wife so I want someone who will drop everything for a quick shag. And if not then I'm presumably immature. It's a shitty generalisation, aka a stereotype, like if I said "women are shit drivers" and you got irritated by it. "But I didn't aim the comment at you...."
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:33 PM
3

It's silly season time again, this is desperation content for a paper.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 06:25 PM
3

This isn't related to parenting, unless you are assuming the accusation is aimed at the father/kid relationship? A logbook would do nothing to prevent accusations that the mother had been assaulted, and not much against claims that the child was.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:42 PM
5

Heh, I wasn't angry then and I'm not angry now. The karma point is that you are obviously not on your usual reddit account, which with your comments is a usual sign of someone coming here in very bad faith. Which contributes to people being pissed off, especially with commenters like yourself.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:10 PM
2

This feels like a typical "hit post". You didn't realise there were pages of replies, full of projection for what spontaneous was meant to mean? as for why people are angry, maybe because someone with 8 years on reddit is coming in, having a go at them when they themselves have 118 post karma 1,370 comment karma. Come back on your main and we'll talk. In the meantime, say Hi to the AHS morons for us.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:15 PM
8

This needs looking over by someone who has an understanding of the law, and it should be noted that legal options differ in different countries/jurisdictions etc. I think the intent to prepare for false accusations is a little over the top, it's much more simple to manage your life so that it's almost impossible to make that accusation in the first place. Never being alone with a woman who is not your significant other would get rid of most of them. The problem is that the usual place for a fals…
/r/MensRights18/07/23 02:54 PM
3

He's a UK poster. There's enough nonsense going on over here to last a lifetime.
/r/MensRights17/07/23 09:51 PM
2

Not really. There's been 1 MP afaik in the UK who supported the idea, but that was opposed by a few who were feminists and dead set against mens rights. The problem is that there are no solid media platforms available to get the message out. TV pundits scream misogyny if you attempt to argue that men are in a bad situation nowadays, and the patriarchy claims are not far behind that. We don't even have any well known streamers on youtube or similar that can get the word out, the left wing are sup…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 07:25 PM
12

It's honestly heartbreaking and so frustrating seeing this shit, especially how boys are being educationally disadvantaged right now, and no one cares. The problem is that camel you see is being held up by a pack of lies that have been spread out to the population over the last century, and comes from the segment of society that everyone wants to protect. We won't make any significant inroads into fixing the problems we see until we can show the general public that these problems exist in the fi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/23 12:39 AM
7

Then there's absolutely no reason not to consider her racist as fuck then.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/23 05:12 PM
51

That IS racist, but for some reason the idea that black people can't be racist got spread around.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/07/23 08:06 PM
29

It's invaluable for Reddit, whether they agree or not. The only legitimately left-wing mens rights sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/23 09:09 PM
3

It should become the standard yeah. Tbh I think people relate to murder more than they relate to sex-crimes, the reputational damage seems worse for them.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:36 PM
4

People seem to be having problems with the idea that "he's not guilty doesn't mean anything about her".. Imagine: man and a woman go into a bedroom, soundproofed and locked. They come out an hour later. She claims she was raped while inside, he denies it and claims she is making a false accusation. There's no proof that he raped her. So he has to be found not guilty. Assuming she went to trial for false accusations, there's no proof that she's lying, so she must be found not guilty as well. Obvi…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 07:31 PM
4

Gag orders on trials have worked, and could work as a routine if sufficient support were given to them. Make the penalty for breaking it serious enough for private citizens and double that at least for new sources. Society has changed, the threat of a citizen vanishing into the bowels of a prison and no one knowing where they are is much less than spewing out a dox of someone who hasn't been proven guilty yet. We have trials where the accuser and accused are anonymous because of the risk of iden…
/r/MensRights14/07/23 06:20 PM
6

"Innocent until proven guilty". Not guilty means you retain your original status, of innocence.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:55 PM
3

People downvoting this reasonable comment: think about what you're doing. Do you really want an emotion-based legal system? Or do you want one where people have to be proven to be rapists, or false accusers? Too many people going with their emotions is how we got into this mess in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:47 PM
4

The answer would be "no, not yet", because they haven't been proven to have lied about anything. If there's a case to answer they'll end up with their day in court and that will be when appropriate consequences are considered.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 05:45 PM
4

As far as it goes the article is fine, women should be pissed off that someone thinks they need the boost to be able to get an award. It entirely fails to give a male perspective, but what it does talk about is accurate. If women WEREN'T complaining about this, then many of us here including myself, would be saying they wanted the hand up because they couldn't compete on an even basis.
/r/MensRights13/07/23 02:09 PM
3

Secure Connection Failed :/
/r/MensRights13/07/23 10:15 AM
1

Neither am I, I'm a Labour supporter mostly. If either party decides they want to end their marriage, a fair split should be arranged. Both will have contributed to the family, whether financially or by having kids or other means. If there's been significant time out of her career then a short period of support is appropriate, I'd go with 1 year per 3 out of career upto a max of 5 years as a rough guideline. Kids get support from both parents arranged seperately to the above, and receipts will b…
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:23 AM
4

If they want to take advantage of it they do, otherwise it'll get buried in other news before the next election. However, we should be joyous at the fact that there's signs of government actually wanting to help out men, even as you say, at their own political inconvenience.
/r/MensRights08/07/23 01:01 AM
6

It's a wedge issue. If the dems can get enough women unhappy with this ruling then they can go after the governer when iirc he's going for President. No matter what you do there will always be someone who is unhappy with it, if you can leverage that unhappiness to strip a load of votes away from your opponent then you're on to a winner.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 11:14 PM
8

Arem't there even more kids in cages nowadays?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 10:56 PM
3

One of their favourite arguments: if there's a bad apple in the bunch and the others don't remove it, they're bad as well. It would be helpful to get some numbers on the amount of misandry by feminists, I had someone trying to tell me earlier that there were less than a million feminists who did the "I hate men" shtick world-wide. Yeah right.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 08:37 PM
3

More likely to be abused in a lesbian relationship than a hetero one.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:58 PM
2

Yes, I'm fully aware, and yes I was joking based on the terminology used.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 10:32 AM
1

I don't think they said the colour of the collar matters at all. Surely if you're a "blue collar worker" you own a few?
/r/MensRights06/07/23 01:41 AM
10

Again this sounds like a problem with those in charge, the teachers are the ones propogating the injustice against male students. Every time a post like this comes up, there's schoolyard aggro, but it's always made a lot worse by the teachers. I'd love to see someone in your position go after the school for failing to protect them, take photos of injuries and statements from witnesses and sue the crap out of them. Loss of a months education is no small thing, as well as the personal damage to re…
/r/MensRights05/07/23 12:22 PM
277

The so-called party of ‘family values’ has just contributed to erosion of the institution of marriage in Florida,” So by reducing the benefits of divorce [ending marriage] to one of the wedded couple, he's eroding marriage? How does that work again?
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/23 02:07 AM
105

they should both be able to live how they were accustomed I'm spotting a flaw in the plan.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 06:22 PM
18

It's not biased or insane, it's just ignorant. They've never done it, so they don't know what it's like. As far as they are concerned looking after kids for a few hours is dreadful, the worst possible work you could do because they don't know anything different.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 01:45 PM
5

I wonder what the percentage of people being bullied by a female boss is compared to that of a male boss?
/r/MensRights26/06/23 09:43 AM
2

I'm not a fan of either. I said an argument could be made, not that I was wanting to make that one :p What I think we should absolutely insist on is that if anyone tries to justify this as a safety issue, then women need to be in the mix as well. Half the reason no one wants to think of women as violent is because those abused by them are encouraged to shut up about it.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 05:19 PM
5

I get that, and yeah, the options for both should be the same. For me though there are two things people can discuss, what they are like as a partner, and whether they should be considered a risk. The former should be right off the table, it's a huge violation of privacy law. The latter though, an argument could be made to allow that. Again, for both men and women. And being covered by libel law if it's false.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:41 PM
12

Tbh I don't give a toss about that, I assume all of them. I'm more bothered if she's going to set fire to my car when I forget to reply to a text from her.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:29 PM
47

Nah, "Crazy exes" would be better.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 01:27 PM
14

Not so easy to arrange, when men don't get to be professional stay-at-home fathers. It might be time to arrange a single-policy pressure group though.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 12:19 PM
25

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/targeted-support-for-women-offenders Read it, then explain to me how any of that does not apply also to men. We really need to push the facts of women's privilege. Don't argue against them claiming men have it, point out stuff like this.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 11:41 AM
15

Payable in arrears and on production of receipts. ie gfy. Heh, and she says that's not actually enough: Christine, 49, alleges the figure "is less than the amount needed to maintain the children in their accustomed lifestyle" and is requesting that Costner, 68, also pay 100% of private-school tuition, extracurricular activities/sports and health-care expenses for their three kids: Cayden, 16, Hayes, 14, and Grace, 13.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 10:55 AM
6

That doesn't hold water because half the time it's the womans mother or grandmother saying "you look stunning". Sure occasionally it'll be someone trying to gaslight the competition, but it's not the only reason by far.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 06:31 PM
29

It could be true, there needs to be some reason for her to start shooting. That doesn't mean this is justified in any way, and seeing that the poor guy has since died she should now be facing murder charges.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 03:45 PM
13

Quite right, it's anecdotal. Just like all of the article, completely non-sourced.
/r/MensRights22/06/23 01:15 PM
3

Most of the time if that accusation is made today the man would still be alive, not always. Hehe, maybe you should check when men got the vote as well? Women have ALWAYS contributed to the system, in that they instruct kids how to behave. How people behave informs the laws that they follow. It all starts with the kids. Of course it's not in the same way men contribute, if anything women have had more of a say in it. It's got the lowest conviction rates because it's the hardest to prosecute. Unle…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 07:30 PM
3

Nah. The cause was the accusation. Without that nothing happens. The problem is that you're ideologically incapable of accepting the truth here, that in a lot of cases men behave exactly as women want them to, and especially when they scream and shout that they've been raped. As for feminism accepting that some of its imaginary societal concepts aren't perfect, well that's a surprise. No one "designed" the system, it's been created through the last few thousand years, and half the people who con…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 06:46 PM
3

And this is the thing that really pisses most men off, that you have a primary cause, a woman making a false accusation. Then you have some prat coming in and crying "toxic masculinity" to try to deflect from the main issue, a man got lynched because a woman made a false accusation, and even now a hundred years later on some toxic women are still claiming that it doesn't happen and that it doesn't hurt much if it does. False accusations don't [usually] get men lynched nowadays, but with social m…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:55 PM
10

Her list of "steps for mental and emotional wellbeing" on youtube: Connect with other humans Be phytsically active Learn new skills Give to others Pay attention to the present moment. Reading the article and seeing this, she's nothing but a scam artist. I'll bet there are people waiting to give her money for her "unique insights". Idiots.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 11:05 PM
55

If ever there were a post exemplifying the benefits of the "shut the fuck up" policy* this is it. Don't talk to the police. If someone has a restraining order out on you delete them from your life. Don't contact them, don't mail them, don't let them contact you. It ALWAYS goes wrong. *Different topic, same principle.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 11:22 AM
20

No trial meant the children would not have to testify, said Marci Diaz Apple, the adoptive mother and the children’s aunt. So the new adoptive mother is the sister of one of these two? And we're meant to listen to what she says? They want to make sure these women don't have a custody battle over the boy. You know what does that? Serving the full 20 years you were sentenced with.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 12:23 AM
6

Possibly, but there's also the political ambitions of the DA who is required to prosecute them for their crimes, yet is concerned that he'll run afould of the feminist lobby when he runs for political office. Finding a way to treat them with kid gloves is the norm for American prosecutors nowadays.
/r/MensRights20/06/23 12:18 AM
2

You can't take part in a sub where you get banned automatically before you even get there. No matter that it's a default sub and thus should be held to a higher standard of moderation.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 09:06 PM
126

Feminists always welcome discussion on places where they have the power to close down anything they don't like, eg feminist subs. They seem to have a real problem when it comes to spaces where they don't hold the whip hand, the answers dry up very quickly there.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 07:51 PM
70

And yet this has been duplicated a few times with the same results. Women in trouble get help. Men in trouble get laughed at.
/r/MensRights18/06/23 11:13 AM
11

I feel sorry for these people, but I can't help think "that's what happens when you fall for the propoganda". All their lives they've been buying into "men have it easier, men are privileged" and now that they've made almost irrevocable choices they realise it's all bullshit. We should be taking these quotes and shouting them from the rooftops. Burn the patriarchy fantasy down using those conned and lied to. Only once that's gone will we have a shot at putting something fair in its place.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 11:57 PM
14

That's the circular argument they always try to work in, patriachy == mens fault == patriarchy == mens fault. Basically it means that since women never did anything at all then men are resposible for everything. I'm sure someone round here is being incredibly sexist, but a feminist would never do that, would they?
/r/MensRights16/06/23 05:10 PM
17

Yarrr, Patriarchy!!
/r/MensRights16/06/23 05:04 PM
3

I don't know, I'm not a mod :p Mods in here are usually pretty decent though. I just can't see it working if they go elsewhere. Fan subs can work like that, the fans want to go somewhere to talk about the subject. Activism subs won't work like that, you need to present the arguments in front of people for them to pay any attention, asking them to go elsewhere to hear something they aren't really bothered about is a non-starter.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 01:44 AM
3

You're probably right. But I hope they think about the_donald sub that went off-site, and hasn't been heard from again.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 01:26 AM
65

We need to be part of the conversations happening around men's rights. If we migrate off-site we cannot do that. The conversations won't come to us on our site, they'll be here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/23 01:02 AM
2

Speaking to the key UN women’s rights group ahead of International Women’s Day on March 8, Guterres said gender equality is “300 years away” I think we can see the reason for the absolute BS. If they thought this was accurate why wouldn't they link to the report?
/r/MensRights14/06/23 06:21 PM
5

It's a "Dog whistle" that gets hordes of comments quickly, with no need to justify the claim. Usually I treat it as a good reason to ignore an idiot.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 06:17 PM
-1

This is the exact argument designed to get maximum pushback from women's rights. Stressing the zero-sum game over the money, yeah that's going to work no problem.
/r/MensRights14/06/23 06:12 PM
3

Until that gets to be the norm, and very shortly afterwards you find it's the new reality that you can't break out from.
/r/MensRights12/06/23 01:33 PM
35

So what's the excuse for not putting a name to the arrested woman? The Beeb usually names every man they can find, most women do not "to protect the identity of children" related to her. In this case it would appear she's murdered them, so who is she?
/r/MensRights12/06/23 12:59 PM
3

So you haven't seen the women postiing in here in support of the MRM? I'm not interested in your purity test. It's always easy to put someone or something down when you take it completely out of context like that. There are plenty of subs that do exactly the same to men, but without any redeeming feature. You can't say "this is wrong, and we're not interested in any reasonable reasons it's happening". If there are reasonable reasons for something then it's not wrong.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 07:37 PM
5

You're assuming people are "gathering stories about shitty women" for the sake of it. It's for the sake of those telling those stories. The benefit to them is greater than any harm done to women as a whole. If you think that's a problem then feel free to add posts you feel appropriate, they'll receive the appropriate response I'm sure. One thing you can be absolutely certain about, the admins are keeping a very close eye on this sub, as it goes against their own political preferences. If they th…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 06:26 PM
6

Not in every way but sometimes this sub feels like that for women. What you're missing is that women and men have issues with each other, have arguments, separations, divorces etc. Almost everywhere women get the opportunity to talk about it, to let off their steam, to obtain a sympathetic ear etc. This is not the case for men. Quite often, this sub is the first, sometimes the only place they can do that. So if you don't like that men are talking about women in an occasionally less than totally …
/r/MensRights11/06/23 05:31 PM
7

And if I call myself and pro MRM and a feminist then what? I call you either delusional or someone who doesn't really know what they're talking about. The flying business class is an extreme, very visible example, but one of the big lies in this world is the "a mothers love". Now that's going to be hugely controversial, but the stats show the biggest abusers of children are their mothers. There are many many people who are screwed up by their mothers, quite often deliberately. I might not feel t…
/r/MensRights11/06/23 04:23 PM
5

There might be a couple but most people in here don't hate women at all. I for one quite like most of them. Feminists, that's a different matter, and they can be women or men. What exposure to stuff like this does is erode away the biases people have towards women and away from men. It reminds us that women are human beings, and yes, that includes doing shit like this, there are plenty who will do it if they think they can convince everyone else that it was a good thing somehow.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 01:03 PM
8

What they don't tell you is that he's using this as evidence for the divorce where he gets full custody.
/r/MensRights11/06/23 12:46 PM
1

After you arrest them on the evidence of the breath test they get blood tested down at the station. There's no arguing with it.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/23 12:31 PM
2

They will do eventually, it doesn't serve enough ads to keep them happy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/23 01:29 AM
1

I'm really not seeing the point of your position here. Do Americans normally carry mouthwash when they are going for a drive? I could possibly imagine a cold remedy, but who cares? If the cop smells alcohol, you then tell him you've been eating cold sweets and show him the pack. He then breathalyses you to be sure, and all's sorted. Doing otherwise is a particularly venal waste of the cops time. And there's no need for roadside tests, they show nothing that a breathalyser doesn't, just a lot les…
/r/PussyPassDenied11/06/23 12:39 AM
2

So it's entirely pointless except for a time-wasting exercise? No, sorry I don't believe that, too many people end up going to the nick because an officer "determined they were under the influence". And presumably if someone HAD used mouthwash or cold treatments as they were pulled over they would have mentioned it, and had packets or bottles to show the officer.
/r/PussyPassDenied10/06/23 01:05 PM
6

Nah. I'll let you search them up. You know the thread I'm talking about so it shouldn't be that hard for you. I'm certainly not going to bother wasting my time for someone who starts shit and then blocks me. Just because you haven't seen posts like that doesn't mean they don't exist, and if you're going to be an arse about it you won't get the help you pout for.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:11 PM
8

It seemed a bit of a series, with added posts linked in the thread, all with the intent of trying to get mra and feminists to work together.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 11:04 PM
7

UK rules: failing to provide a specimin of breath. Which tbh is a great system, you get stopped, cop thinks you've been drinking, blow into this, either innocent or guilty in under 5 minutes. None of this crap about standing on one foot or backwards alphabet, and most importantly, no "cops discretion about thinking you've been drinking".
/r/PussyPassDenied09/06/23 11:02 PM
8

It's come up a few times in the last month. "Would you be a friend with a feminist?" and all that lot.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 06:53 PM
8

The discussion is about MRAs working with feminists, not men working with women. There's a few women who are MRAs in here, and more outside. And we all know there are plenty of male feminists.
/r/MensRights09/06/23 06:52 PM
5

There's absolutely no pussy pass asked for here, watch the second vid, I'm really pleased by the lack of excuses or justifications, it's very positive. Yeah, the result is as expected, but they're all having fun so fair enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/23 02:30 PM
12

It's way too late to let boys be boys anymore. We've had a generation brought up with this crap, and if it goes on too much longer it will become the default position, argument will be frowned upon and eventually banned. Like you say, brainwashing, not something kids are particularly good at resisting. If we don't teach boys about being men ourselves then this lot will do it, and the kids will be so much worse off for it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/23 10:33 PM
3

What's the definition of "systemic" again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/06/23 10:27 PM
6

Why the change in the title?
/r/MensRights05/06/23 05:57 PM
6

Which is the argument for not settling from either side. If a woman is in that position that she thinks she needs to drop her standards, then he should maintain his own, she won't be good for him.
/r/MensRights04/06/23 12:21 PM
21

It's a perfect insult, because it can't be turned around on the women using it, which is the ultimate failing of "racist" and "sexist". Because of the lack of effect on women there won't be any public outcry about how offensive it is, it'll hang around for quite some time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/23 10:46 PM
10

The only thing that helps is a willingness to listen, to discuss the issues. Feminism has done a fantastic job convincing a lot of people that women are oppressed, men are the oppressors, and that men will lie about it. Breaking past that barrier is really difficult until women see how things affect men and boys they know. Then, sometimes, they might bother to look at what's going on.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/06/23 10:40 PM
2

I've had a look at some of her short vids and generally they are pretty reasonable. I wonder if this one is maybe being taken a little out of context, she seems pretty male-positive. Maybe she just needs a nudge to say "a bit more than 30s please, this is his life you're talking about".
/r/MensRights02/06/23 09:16 PM
14

The problem is that feminism seems to be directly opposed to men's rights, and actively campaign against men having injustices eased. The concept of the "patriarchy" is designed to attack men, with the presumed intent of making life easier for women. That they stubbornly refuse to let go of the "men are privileged" because a couple of billionaires are male makes it feel like they have to spout that line in case anyone actually looks at the life of the average man compared to the average womans. …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/23 08:56 PM
30

If you translate personhood as financial benefits, it fits perfectly.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:24 PM
5

I can see where she's coming from, but she doesn't seem to be able to see how soul-crushing it must be to get "30 seconds of sympathy" in a situation like that. I guess her boyfriend doesn't open up to her much, not with that as a reaction.
/r/MensRights02/06/23 07:22 PM
9

Feel free to post a better source.
/r/MensRights01/06/23 11:17 AM
2

What's the name of the dog in the Dambusters movie? Or the favourite insult in Love Thy Neighbour? Maybe the second, after "Honky".
/r/PussyPassDenied31/05/23 05:42 PM
4

Follow the link through to feminismuncensored. Full of presumably feminists who continually bang on the patriarchy while refusing even to consider the list of injustices men face. When it was pointed out that men holding positions of power are miniscule, we got: Just because the absolute majority of men don’t hold institutional power doesn’t mean that the absolute majority of people who hold institutional power aren’t men which is a numbers game, and deliberately ignoring the point made. While I…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:07 PM
13

Lawsuit for defamation. Pays the bills for the lawyer at least, while keeping your name out of the papers and getting the school to stop supporting the BS claim.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 10:54 AM
1

I'd guess that being a feminist is antithetical to agreeing with those 3 points. I'd be fine with anyone who could agree with those, but I couldn't imagine a committed feminist doing so.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 04:44 PM
4

Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women. Once again making the mistake of assuming women and feminism are identical. Or most likely not a mistake at all, they just hope no one will notice it.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 04:28 PM
36

Rocking. As always it takes realisation that the men and boys nearest to you [she has 2 sons] will be really badly affected if nothing is done, but this is a hell of a step forward. All credit to her, let's hope for more of these.
/r/MensRights29/05/23 12:31 PM
8

I don't know, it says so much about the people who use the phrase. It's like the N word used to be before it got banned, says so much more about the user than the target.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/23 06:00 PM
3

They'll support female privilege, they always have. The paedophilia is a new one though.
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:49 PM
59

This is why statutory crimes exist in the first place, because those they are committed against are too dumb to realise they've been harmed. [Yeah, most 16 year old boys are dumb, I was when I was one].
/r/MensRights27/05/23 04:48 PM
43

/r/FemaleSexPredatorNews
/r/MensRights26/05/23 11:40 PM
2

Campaigners welcomed the move on Thursday, but said it needed to come alongside far-reaching changes in policing itself before many women would feel able to trust the authorities. So despite it being considered the equal of terrorism, it's still not enough?
/r/MensRights26/05/23 06:20 PM
22

He's saying instead of accepting her story without evidence he's now questioning it. That's analytical.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 06:17 PM
3

For a change of pace, it's interesting to see how the law protects his identity while outing the two women involved. See how it goes, but this might be a way forward against false accusations.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 06:15 PM
2

Yeah. I can't think of any other point of view that makes any sense at all though. I mean, sure, I'd guess she's insane but you'd assume they ruled that out before trial. So how the hell else can she justify to anyone, especially herself, the murder of her kid? I don't have any kids and I couldn't imagine something like that, so how can she have hers and do that?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/23 05:22 PM
11

She's a bit thick. She's on camera trying to defraud people and she's shouting something that will get the attention of the police pretty quickly. Oops.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 02:49 PM
9

"I can always make a new one with a better dad" I'm sure that's what the mentality is there.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/05/23 02:20 PM
3

Wealthier families have better health care as well.
/r/MensRights26/05/23 10:23 AM
18

A major reason for low birth rates is that we've got used to kids surviving. Used to be we'd have 8-10 kids a family, of which half or more would die early on for various reasons. Once antibiotics came into the picture that rate changed a lot. It took a little while but people got used to kids surviving, and that's when the birth rate plummetted. Families in poor countries still have a high birth rate because they still have a lot of child mortality, or have relatively recent memory of high chil…
/r/MensRights26/05/23 09:46 AM
9

Maybe you should think about not using a manipulative phrase on people who have been manipulated by it all their lives?
/r/MensRights24/05/23 10:24 AM
2

cast its protective shade onto a nearby bench during “some times of day”. There's a picture of it doing exactly that in the article. Pity it's side on to the bench, so if you're wider than say 3 inches you're not getting shade, sorry.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 10:10 AM
7

Ahh, there you are. The phrase "a real man" has always been used to try to manipulate men and boys. It shows the true thought process going on in your head.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 10:04 AM
7

I can see where the problem lies, they say this is the best they can do because of LA regulations. The answer should be : Change the damn regulations!, not create some useless collander.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 10:01 AM
4

Genius Daily Mail putting this in the FeMail section. A very sad story but I find myself really annoyed with him for not taking the opportunity to get the hell out. Most DV victims don't have good options for getting away but this sounds like the sister would have backed him. If you're being abused, and you see a clear way to get out, take it. No ifs buts or "they promised to improve" BS, this is the result. Get yourself safe FIRST, then you can look at what the situation is and see if you want …
/r/MensRights22/05/23 09:15 PM
2

The teacher from Surrey in South East London Say what again?
/r/MensRights21/05/23 09:59 AM
8

“I feel like my son is robbed of his childhood. Now he’s having to be a father. He’s a victim, and he’s going to have to live with that for the rest of his life,” It always amazes me how ignorant of consequences to men and boys people generally are, until it affects someone they know personally.
/r/MensRights20/05/23 09:25 AM
7

No no, not at all, that's what I think of you. You think you represent all women, but the fraction of 1% that you do represent are the extremists we all want to avoid. You are almost literally the women that drive men to this sub. You also seem to be a publicist for that book, the mere fact that you are advocating it means it should be on my blacklist forever. I beg to differ, you are definitely NOT on my side. Maybe you should consider that your viewpoint is not the only one available, and that…
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:27 PM
4

Just be glad the sub doesn't follow the same principles as other subs you post in. Then at best you'd be asking permission to speak or just outright banned.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 12:58 PM
11

Systemic perhaps?
/r/MensRights19/05/23 09:39 AM
4

Read the article. It emphasises how badly she has been treated “Having your voice being silenced is the worst feeling in the world,” the victim told the courtroom. I'd say being locked away for life without parole for rape of your stepdaughter when you're innocent has to be the worst feeling in the world. It hardly mentions his trauma, as a convicted paedo and rapist, that was far from the easiest 20 years.
/r/MensRights18/05/23 04:53 AM
24

based on the Levitt Report, co-authored by Alison Levitt and Sir Keir Starmer Sir Keir Starmer, leader of the opposition Labour party, that Sir Keir Starmer?
/r/MensRights13/05/23 01:23 PM
10

Trying to frame this as a way to protect the accused is kinda low. Putting a defendants details out there makes them a target, especially in the internet age. I get we don't want secret trials, but there's no need to publicise unproven allegations. All they have to do is "John Smith, Friday 2pm Court 5, Sydney Crown Court." No details of accusations, if you want that you have to go to the court at that time. This prevents a huge ramp up of popular activism to trash their lives before they even g…
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:36 AM
6

Bloody hell Australia. Fairness and civilised behaviour would say name only after a guilty verdict, you're going completely the wrong way here. I wonder if they consider naming rape accusers before the trial to be fair and open justice as well?
/r/MensRights12/05/23 03:25 AM
9

You think she would have agreed to that if she thought it was actually going to be a fair fight? She was expecting all kinds of pass, and as soon as he hit her the first time the penny dropped. She should have gone through the ropes.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/05/23 02:16 PM
6

Drat, somehow I missed your response, sorry. First off, this sub is for talking about men's rights. If you have comments or suggestions that can help, you are more than welcome to make them. This is not a "men only" space, though I would advise a pleasant audio background, a massage and maybe a couple of valium before venturing in here. As you may have noticed, places where men can open up are in exceedingly short supply and getting rarer. And considering it's almost impossible to do so in a rel…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 02:30 AM
9

Not when they are my father, my brother, my sons.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/23 12:11 AM
1

diatribe: A bitter, abusive denunciation. From above But it sure would be nice if every diatribe about how men are treated like some amorphous slime mold But it sure would be nice if every bitter denunciation about how men are treated like some amorphous slime mold I'm really not seeing a problem here.
/r/MensRights09/05/23 12:06 AM
2

You're either a troll or you might as the point Err? I might what? I'm not a troll, I dislike bullshit and really hate hypocrisy. I don't have any issues with good use of English and find the idea that someone who is be well-spoken cannot be telling the truth to be insane. "Hey guys, we're part of the mens rights movement, so we're not allowed to use good English anymore, in fact using sentences is now frowned upon. Better if we speak in grunts, just to be safe."
/r/MensRights08/05/23 09:34 PM
7

Quite right, but remember this is one of the few places left where men can vent on reddit so don't take it too personally if possible. And this post, the one you replied to, just got targetted in /againstmensrights. Now THEY as a group as a whole, are truly shitty human beings.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:28 AM
1

Umm, that's reasonable English. Being well spoken or having a knowledge of a language does not rule out a boyfriend.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:25 AM
2

Vacuuming a room every day when you don't use and there's no kids in the house is BS. So is cleaning before the cleaner gets there. So why did you decide to come here with a troll account?
/r/MensRights08/05/23 11:04 AM
2

Sure, but then you have the discussion of what is necessary housework and what is BS. And we should really think about having a karma/account age minimum to post in here.
/r/MensRights08/05/23 10:59 AM
25

Women want succesful men, rather than a career. Sure, that makes sense for her. For it to make sense to him though she has to come with something to offer. Luckily for women, men tend to accept being a homemaker as equivalent to bringing money in from a career. What won't work is coming with nothing, not wanting a career but not wanting to look after the house and kids either. Both have to contribute, or it won't work.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 11:54 PM
10

How about mentioning the /r/MensRights sub as well. This is NOT an us vs them situation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/05/23 12:36 AM
3

Ahh damnit, I knew there was something I missed. Thanks for the addition.
/r/MensRights06/05/23 01:07 AM
47

As usual, feminists have picked the stats they like to throw around. Sure, the vast majority of rape accusations never go anywhere, rape is a crime that takes place without witnesses and whose victims have a reluctance to report to the police in time for evidence to be collected. So ten years later she walks into a police station and is surprised that nothing can be proven. Way too late. Then there's a hell of a lot of false accusations made, normally in divorce cases to support the mothers atte…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:05 PM
7

It couldn't be done. That would require the BBC to recognise that men actually have problems and could use somewhere to talk about them, which would cause a riot in the studios.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 04:39 PM
12

Tbf one hour a day on one channel isn't breaking the bank imo, woman's hour has been going for quite a while now, since 1946. The conceit that somehow the rest of the stuff they put out is solely intended for men is staggering but it does make an easy excuse to push forward.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 02:20 PM
31

Whatever you do, don't look up the UN Womens twitter account. Or consider that there isn't a UN Mens twitter account.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 04:29 AM
13

Just ask them how Big Red is doing. Then when they start to talk make a dive for the fire alarm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/05/23 04:27 AM
2

Got sick of it ten years ago, movies lost a customer. Vote with your feet.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 05:41 PM
7

Which doesn't change the situation at all.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/05/23 05:59 PM
1

Oh, I'm quite happy with it thanks. Missing out the important line is quite the give away.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 05:43 PM
3

A role model? Probably not, that's "do as I do" which wouldn't work out very well. As someone who can hopefully get them to think, sure. He puts young men at the heart of their decision-making process, which seems to be very rare nowadays.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/23 04:05 PM
3

You're just proving your own statement, there's no point in arguing with science deniers but you aren't on the side you think you are.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 03:30 PM
19

Not many tumours have their own pulse.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:19 AM
4

If the child is the patient and the parents have legal responsibilities to support that child, then how does the hospital sever that obligation to inform the parents [plural] of test results?
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:18 AM
11

I understand the automatic ban from subreddit for commenting or posting here There's no good reason for that. The bad reasons include making sure that the problems men face are kept contained and isolated away from the rest of the population. The good news is that they seem to be leaking out across reddit anyway, and getting a moderate amount of support.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 07:26 PM
2

It's funny how often commentators like to label the same action as "deplorable" from men, yet "stunning and brave" from women.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 05:13 PM
6

And today's special word is "HYPERGAMY". Hi, purr, game, eeee. This is not something "succesful" women do, it's something ALL women do, well 95%+.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 09:11 PM
5

"Princess". Every dad who has called his daughter his little princess has pushed them towards this. Mothers too, but I think it's more a dad thing.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 09:06 PM
7

"Oh but the draft will never be used, we don't need to worry about it.." Easy solution, everyone or no one should be eligible to be drafted. Ahh, who am I trying to kid?
/r/MensRights29/04/23 08:45 PM
4

There's issues with not calling it rape, but the real problem is when they [UK government] get called out on the sexism of treating them differently, and they double down and lie about the penalties saying they are the same punishments when we can see they aren't. We've had 2 petitions with over 20k signatures that both got boilerplate responses: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300270 the other was substantially the same. There's systemic sexism talked about by feminists, and then there…
/r/MensRights28/04/23 05:12 PM
3

Psychiatric treatment is not a jail sentence, being restricted to the hospital is for their own benefit. The sentence should only start once they are fit to serve it. She still owes us ten years.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:56 PM
5

Rape kits: well some of them undoubtedly don't get tested because fo funding issues, but the other reason for there to be so many untested piling up is that a rape accusation was withdrawn, proceeded without the test being needed, or a confession obtained, so again not needed. The mere fact of untested kits existing does not indicate that no one is bothered about rape.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:46 PM
14

Something to note, various countries set a different bar to what rape is to the US. The UK mandates rape as needing a penis, so women cannot be accused of rape. When this happens it is called sexual assault, yeah, the same as a man touching a womans backside without her consent. There's an element of controversy about that one.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 11:40 PM
3

That's the thing though, a lot of our laws aren't codified, and presumption of innocence has been in for a few centuries at least, afaik.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 06:29 PM
5

Yup, we're also back to the law not standing for individual citizens but for the ruling classes. Scotland should know better. Iirc last time around it led to a little bit of discontent between the judges and the clans, wonder if that'll happen again?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 06:19 PM
5

Quite a few "it's" in there, not following those, what was codified in UK law in 1998? I'd have said with a presidential system your electoral system seems more French than British, but the legal system came from us, this was before the time of the Napoleonic code [1804 in France] Before that it was a bit of a mess and wouldn't be a good candidate for adoption. I thought the US legal system was put in place before that.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 06:17 PM
7

It's the media as well, jumping on an easy bandwagon "See the pretty girl in distress, don't you want to kill the guy who did this to her?" Against the two it's hard to put forward a sane argument, with all the screaming and BS being thrown around.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:29 PM
12

Twirls moustaches, "Yes, I am, and I'm happy to be a musojjynesquik, I really want to ipress womyn! Who cares about hundreds of thousands of men rotting in jails around the world because they are falsely accused and convicted because "statistics are too low" for a crime that witnesses almost never see?"
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:18 PM
11

Appeal lawyers are going to make a fortune working on no win no fee basis.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:07 PM
11

Unlike in the US, the UK law officially deems the prisoner is guilty until proven innocent. Eh? No we don't. The US system is based on the English one.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 04:03 PM
7

As a verdict it leaves a lot to be desired. If something is not proven then innocence should be assumed, and the benefit of that assumption be applied to everyone where proof is not available. Getting a verdict of "not proven" has meant people being considered "guilty but having got away with it", much better to have not guilty verdicts only.
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:55 PM
28

Sure, until you get a judge who thinks "68% of cases like this are guilty, and the boss is pushing me for more convicitons, so I'd better send this one away". Prosecutors already believe they only have a responsibility to provide a prosecution, if the judge then has the responsibility to convict who then will be looking to see that a trial is fair?
/r/MensRights27/04/23 03:52 PM
15

Says it all really. This was discussed on other subs and the commentary was "well men leave just as often and isn't she brave for running". Nah. She's done something absolutely appalling and now seems to be trying to get her reputation up and spread the word that she's available by this marathon drama. Unfortunately they probably can't get a real reaction out of Jelle because he still hopes something is going to work out. Sorry man, it's not, best to accept that and move on right now. Which incl…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 11:09 PM
2

It's already gone to arbitration via the special master afaik, so we can rule out illegal bias from the judge. Which just leaves legal bias from the judge.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 10:55 PM
5

You believe it to be the truth, doesn't make it actually the truth. You've absolutely no idea what's going on in my area, who the MP is, what their political backing is like, so stop trying to make a drama out of a situation that you're blind about.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 07:18 PM
8

You can think what you want, that's entirely up to you.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 07:00 PM
9

You shouldn't take my distaste for current Labour politicians as a tacit support for the conservatives, it isn't. It's not support for Labour either, neither party deserve my support. Of the two, I'm open to supporting Labour at some future date when they get their head out of their arses, see the harm they are doing, and start to fix it.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:53 PM
11

There are no Labour MPs that support mens rights. There are however a few that actively despise the idea.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:11 PM
1

They did, and 2 elections later the tories are still in charge and still making things worse for everyone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_United_Kingdom_general_election They still don't seem to have got the message, last I heard they were taking about making men respect women more. If you look at the bottom of that second article, you'll see a related article, Emily Atack, whoever she is from the photo op, "I feel like I'm sexually assaulted 100 times a day". This does not bode well.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 01:13 PM
1

It would be very nice to get representation from both ends of the political spectrum. Unfortunately shouting at Labour MPs to get their finger out and give men some support is currently considered anti-women, despite it only being related in statistical matters.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:46 AM
3

Labour haven't been in power for over a decade. The problem is that no one is actually "for men" apart from a small organisation and maybe an MP.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 12:29 AM
14

Scroll down 2 pictures.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 10:49 PM
1

Garbage In, Garbage Out.
/r/MensRights23/04/23 02:26 AM
10

This sub tends to be a landing point for men who are dealing with a crisis with a woman. Either a divorce, or a marriage breakup, or a false accusation, this is the first place they end up while they are very stressed. So we get a few who are very anti-women at the time who really need to vent. They don't hate women, and given a bit of time and sympathy they usually calm down and remember that. Less tolerant posters will often label them as women-haters and misgynists, when a few weeks ago they …
/r/MensRights22/04/23 03:36 PM
25

It's way too obvious, most people should get this.
/r/MensRights21/04/23 09:29 PM
22

One being a woman able to throw boiling oil over someone, the other being a judge able to get involved with a woman whose divorce he was adjudicating. She's much better off with her real dad.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:14 AM
27

I've no problem with them taking rape allegations seriously, and telling people that they do so. I'd be a lot happier if they would tell people who are victims of perjury that they take these equally seriously.
/r/MensRights19/04/23 01:48 PM
35

That boy who defended his sister from a pitbull getting his face ripped up: "if someone was going to die I thought it'd be better if it were me". This shit happens all the time.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 09:56 PM
7

When it comes down to it you're talking about a woman who doesn't believe you have the right to speak. That she has the right to decide when you should be able to talk or not. In my mind it's very difficult to relate this to someone who is loving and compassionate, there's a blind spot here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/04/23 06:37 PM
2

That's a particularly idiotic response from the government. No exemptions for cosmetic surgery, so no operations to fix damaged or congenitally malformed genitalia, and no way to undo the harm of previous fgm. And I assume that the "no plans to amend the legislation specifically to prohibit female genital cosmetic surgery." is a cockup as well, seeing as it is prohibited, and that they meant to say "to allow cosmetic surgery" Unfortunately the line where they say Women who have genital piercings…
/r/MensRights18/04/23 02:28 PM
0

And this is the advice of a clinic? I'm wondering what procedures that clinic carries out. And nothing there refers to the risks involved in circumcision or the harm it causes. However it's irrelevant to the discussion. You were arguing there was a significant difference between female circumcision and male circumcision. Nothing there answers that point.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 01:49 PM
6

Tell us you know nothing about the subject without telling us you know nothing about the subject.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:58 AM
3

Also, in the UK, if an adult women voluntarily goes to a piercing parlour for a few certain piercings, that's technically FGM and some of the statistics actually count it... That's so incredibly fucked up. I'm not trying to be contrary, but would you have a source for future reference?
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:57 AM
8

By all accounts that one is the most common form, while infibulation [the one that ends up sewing up the vulva] is the least common. It really doesn't matter though, anything to do with religion/culture and genitals is automatically suspect, and adding sharp edges to the mix is definitely a "stop right now" situation.
/r/MensRights18/04/23 12:54 AM
5

Yeah, that's pretty much what I was after, the idea that while the left has some great ideas it can also get some things very badly wrong, and it has a certain amount of fantaticism that makes self-correction difficult. Sooner or later I'm probably going to get banned for suggesting that not every right-wingers ideas are spawn of the devil. Looking in the mens rights sub, the majority seem to prefer the right wing if only as opposition to feminism etc, and they do come up with some good ideas. I…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 08:20 PM
7

Oh I'm all for Erin Pizzey to be mentioned, absolutely she is important in this. It's strictly the part that mentions "wife beating" when you're trying to make the point that violence comes from and to everyone, rather than just towards wives. If there's a different cover without that subtitle on it, that'd be great.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 02:12 PM
3

Nothing to do with my view on the subject, but it's an easy point for someone arguing against the post to make.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 02:10 PM
238

When a woman shows you she is a gold-digger and is mostly concerned about "child" support, believe her.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/04/23 01:41 PM
3

Having the first book ever on domestic violence sub-titled "The book breaking the silence about wife battering" might seem to contradict your point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/23 01:22 PM
19

You should realise there's a large part of the population that thinks this is exactly what the left is about, especially after the last decade. Just because something is virulently evil does NOT make that part of the political group you are opposed to. Sometimes it's in the group you support. At that point you have to make a decision, do you continue to support that group, do you support none, do you switch sides, or.. do you try to fix the group you support.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/23 12:02 AM
3

Is there a study asking men the same question? It seems pretty obvious that women will say men being unfaithful is worse. While you're undoubtedly correct in your conclusion, having only half the story in stats makes it easy to dismiss.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 04:48 PM
0

He's done plenty since to show what a psychopath he is, a lot of it during the recent truckers strike or whatever it was called.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 04:36 PM
8

So what? You have to base your buildings/vehicles etc around something, and human average is what that'll be. I suspect the only people who have problems with door sizes etc are adult males who have to duck going into rooms. As for car seat belts, I wonder if your stats take into account that women are more fragile with thinner bones than men, so are more likely to get broken ribs, especially if they have neglected to adjust the seat and belt appropriately? As a left hander, I have been inconven…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 04:33 PM
4

Pity they didn't get the top job. Trudeau is a lunatic. It's never been a patriarchy, except in certain religion-dominated areas of the world. Unless you can point to laws that exclusively benefit all men at the expense of all women?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/23 01:53 PM
19

I thought we were in for an interesting time when he started off saying MRAs produced the film The Red Pill. That was made by Cassie Jaye as a feminist, with the intent of arguing against MRA talking points, but she had the honesty to admit when she realised that the talking points were accurate. Then he started on the "you're not letting women into these jobs" when it doesn't come down to personal preference, it's risking lives in the army combat roles, in firefighting etc. Imo if they can phys…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/23 08:18 PM
3

It comes back, as always, to the media. Men cheat because they want a quick shag. Wlomen cheat because they are emotionally neglected. This is the standard portrayal in movies, so society adopts it and the press follows suit: men are bestial, women are these ethereal beings. It's pathetic and manipulative, but that's the quality of story telling we have nowadays.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 12:01 PM
51

Hit the nail on the head with this imo. The line about 80% of cases report no significant risk of suicide just before an actual suicide shows that the mental health profession is way off the mark when it comes to mens suicide risks, and probably their mental health as well. That would seem to me to be an obvious and important direction for follow up studies for the future, I personally wonder if it might be similar to the problems in teaching boys, women are being used as the standard, and no on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/04/23 05:27 PM
39

Pretty obvious this was going to be the case. Women in general are more social than men, so they are likely to take the perspective that the group should come first. When politics have pushed the line of "needs of the many vs needs of the one" so close to the tipping point, people who feel the group should have precedence will necessarily be on the other side of that tipping point. The concept of free speech should always have been championed by universities, it's a shame that the motivation to …
/r/MensRights11/04/23 12:32 PM
7

Colour me not at all surprised.
/r/MensRights10/04/23 07:57 PM
10

Has there been any response from teachers unions about this?
/r/MensRights10/04/23 03:10 PM
6

Excellent news. Get it rolled out asap.
/r/MensRights09/04/23 09:23 PM
11

Yes, it's a farce. But it does keep up those numbers for the headlines "Violence against women laws charge hundreds within a month".. no mention of whether those hundreds are women or not. It's curious that domestic violence seems to now be considered a gendered act, only against women, whether those women are female or male. I assume the complement is true, that it can only be committed by men, whether those men are male or female. Again, those numbers are going to be spectacular.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/04/23 03:08 PM
8

I don't think menslib is actually a serious sub. It feels much more like an "accepted and controlled opposition", somewhere feminist men can go so they can say that their concerns are addressed, when the reality is that it makes no difference at all. Any views that are not politically correct in nature are banned, except for those that are there to be mocked or argued against. Even if you were able to convince the users that they should change a view, it would be banned as would yourself and the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/23 08:58 AM
3

I bet if the judges name was on that list she'd be inside for 10 years.
/r/MensRights07/04/23 02:56 PM
2

This was the UK.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/23 10:44 AM
2

In order to change the system, you need to disincentivise false accusations. This seems like a logical step, if they haven't reported an accusation to the police then the compensation claim gets put into abeyance until they do. If the accusation occurs after a prosecution is viable then that terminates the claim. Encourage real accusations to ffollow the system, so that we lose this "women don't want to report to the authorities" argument as well.
/r/MensRights06/04/23 10:37 AM
2

Strange that you think the US is the only place that exists, I remember a rally with Tony Benn and Arthur Scargill, so I don't know where you're getting the "can't experience the left wing party" from, unless you're talking only about the US.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:41 PM
1

There could be plenty of reasons for that, the one I think is relevant is that Gen Xers like myself had a left wing party during our younger years and have seen what it has turned into, enough for quite a few of us to walk away. The younger generations haven't had that experience, to them the left has always been the way it is now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 10:27 PM
10

I'm surprised that a victim compensation scheme would consider paying out to someone who refuses to cooperate with the authorities to get a conviction.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 07:36 PM
4

Depends how you do it. Someone pans through your history during a discussion "oh, you post in r-MRA or r-lwma, you must be a freak" If you go off on them like a lunatic all you do is reinforce their opinion. If you turn around and say "well, boys are being left behind, men are disposable, so ofc I'm an advocate." etc, pick one and give a couple of details, they can't laugh that off so easily and you often get a real discussion going. At least you give the impression that the posters in the subs …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/23 09:32 AM
53

It feels like the left has lost a generation of support, especially in the UK. The anti-male narrative has been so toxic that many men have just bowed out of the discussion, while others have gone the full hog and voted for the right. This is likely to continue as long as the left refuses to address the problems men face. The idea that "we can ignore these people and their concerns will disappear" isn't working and will only make things worse in the long run. Expecting men to forgive and forget …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/04/23 03:44 PM
3

And yet even the judge says "go be a good mother", obviously expecting her to get the kids back.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:47 AM
2

I'm not massively concerned about him, he's made his choice and they aren't together anymore. But the next man she goes apeshit on won't know about it.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 09:43 AM
6

I think it's usually the social pressure, "she's a mum, you can't help put a mum in jail" ignoring the massive string of previous offences and that she stabbed him already. He's still an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:57 PM
5

He was responsible for her not being charged with GBH. Bloody idiot.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:49 PM
6

I would so love to be able to hold that judge to account when she escalates. The bizarre part is the guy she stabbed refused to cooperate with the police investigation. But two charges of grievous bodily harm and assault from an earlier incident were dropped after Mr Boscoe declined to give a statement. This is a really stupid thing to do, if you get assaulted you help the prosecution!
/r/MensRights03/04/23 06:44 PM
10

Except it's legit. PDF
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/23 10:05 AM
0

Not touching that one either way. i thought India was the non-Muslim partition? If so, how did they get a strong voice in the legal system?
/r/MensRights01/04/23 02:28 PM
3

Geniuses. I can just imagine someone getting beaten up, the police jumping in to stop it, then, "hang on, he's a xxxxx, sorry for interrupting, carry on.."
/r/MensRights01/04/23 02:25 PM
11

That why the article made a point of mentioning tha the boy wasn't fully developed yet? And who the hell thought having 2 sets of laws for different religions was a good idea?
/r/MensRights01/04/23 02:19 PM
20

The woman, who is now married and is a mother of a two-year-old daughter, said she will challenge the judgement in higher court because the relations were developed with mutual consent. Age of consent is 18 in India, so how she's going to get that to work for her is anyone's guess.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 02:10 PM
2

I was thinking more about classroom styles, and how they've changed schools to fit the female learning system rather than incentives to further education. Biased forms of encouragement could do to be removed, teaching techniques are fine, in a girls school/class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/23 10:14 AM
1

Sure, it's a personal thing. A red flag is "stuff this, I'm out of here". Amber is "ok, that's weird but I can live with it if it doesn't get worse". Some people's amber flags will be red for others, some will not be a problem for others. Like eating toast in bed.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 10:09 AM
7

Yeah, that's just what boys nowadays would need, an extra year's delay in their education built into the system. I wonder if that would help with the wage gap issues, sorry but I'm a little suspicious about things nowadays. It's curious that this doesn't get the "men and women are identical" response, that must be just for when men have a perceived superiority. You may have a potential solution there: During the past 50 years, every change in how we teach has been done to improve girls STEM scor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 07:12 PM
19

The statistics are past the point of debate, obviously schools are failing boys, there's no doubt about it. The big question is what to do about it, do we segregate classes, insist on blind grading [which would imply we need blind tuition], put more money into research into ways to teach boys, put a moratorium on hiring female teachers over males, or something completely different? Of course the real problem will be getting anyone in authority to actually admit that there's a problem in the firs…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/23 05:08 PM
11

Everyone has flags to some degree, maybe amber, maybe red. Some are much more obvious than others though. And some aren't as serious to some people as others.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 03:18 PM
13

Did you reply to the wrong comment there?
/r/MensRights31/03/23 02:40 PM
11

Just go to Boston, say you're helping out the Irish, take a collection and someone will send some guns over for you.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:58 PM
59

That doesn't mean there are never any red flags to see in other relationships. If you see them, gtfo.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 01:55 PM
2

I mean in general, not particularly in this case. I saw a judge give a summary of sentences, added up to over 20 years, but half of them ran concurrently, ended up as 8 years total. How do they decide which run with each other, and which run consecutively?
/r/MensRights29/03/23 09:41 PM
5

See that's what i don't understand. How do you get concurrent sentences, if I murder a guy and get 20 years, but if I murder 10 guys and get 20 years each to be served concurrently it's the exact same time. Where's the justice in that?
/r/MensRights29/03/23 08:39 PM
19

She came to fame by starring in a video topless. I've nothing against that, but I do think it's rather hypocritical to do so then complain about men looking at it.
/r/MensRights29/03/23 02:12 PM
15

There was a couple of serious cases of herpes passed on from rabbis like that in NY iirc. https://www.newsweek.com/rabbi-infant-penis-herpes-1460790
/r/MensRights28/03/23 06:56 PM
7

In a few years time there will be an advert about "helping men who are incels", along the lines of the Gillette ad. It will be another shot at shaming men, and media etc. will refer to it saying how sad it is that no one understood it properly. Used to be that the right cared about money, the left cared about people. Now the left cares about causes and stuff the people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/23 11:09 AM
129

So she made an accusation, but the man was actually in police custody at the time. Then she made a second accusation against him, so they put him in remand for a few weeks? Was no one thinking "hang on, how do we know this accusation is more reliable than the last one?" If not, why not, and how long is it going to take him to get a suit for unlawful imprisonment going?
/r/MensRights26/03/23 10:52 AM
1

I'm unwilling to say why others aren't reporting it,I just wanted to say the mail is bullshit Says it all really. You're bitching about a paper that reports something we need to know about, and you're giving passes away to other papers that don't even touch the story. You do realise that this makes the Mail look better than the rest, don't you? Even if they are biased, at least they are covering the story.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 09:45 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. Why are the 2 biggest, most well known news sources not reporting on this? You can fling shit at the Mail, sure some of it is deserved, but you can't see that you're supporting some of the most toxic reporting in the world. And if you think they don't lie to you, boy, have I got news for you.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 08:33 PM
1

The churches influence and power has been minimal for the last 30? years. Trying to pin the abortion laws in the US on men is pathetic, there were as many women in favour of it as men over there. Funny how some people forget that. While this, along with DV laws based on the Duluth model, is something that's come into being in the last 20 years, you'll see that guidelines for sentencing will have been updated in that time.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:41 PM
3

If it wasn't true there'd be 3 people and a whole bunch of organisations lining up to sue them penniless. Question is, why aren't the Guardian and the BBC reporting on this? The answer is because it doesn't fit their agendas. If you don't want the Mail to be used as a source then get the media to report on everything, not just what makes them feel warm inside. ed: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/victorian-high-school-teacher-sentenced-for-sexual-relationship-with-student/AD6U7Y7AZNFA7K7VYMNYLVM…
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:25 PM
1

They set the law over there, what we're asking for is even-handedness in the way it's applied. If they'd send a man to jail for this then they should send a woman to jail for this. There's a link above of a man doing exactly the same thing, he got 3 years inside. So should she.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:18 PM
3

Which set of laws have we had any effect on, and how many sex offenders have we enabled? You can call MRA whatever you want, and people do, but we haven't setup a framework of laws that actively supports child predation. Feminists are big on "power imbalance" and you can say the same here, they have the political power, and women are the ones committing the crimes with no punishment. Seems like oppression to me.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:11 PM
20

That's why 14 year old you is not on the bench judging it. We're meant to have a legal system that determines guilt, and affords appropriate punishment for it. Not one that goes "Fwoarr, look at them jubblies!!!" and dies of thirst while letting a sex offender free on the streets. Don't forget, most girls who are victims don't consider themselves that either.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:05 PM
40

His victim was 17, hers was 16. He got 3 years, she got 300 hours community service.
/r/MensRights24/03/23 07:01 PM
5

They'll justify it by saying that naming her identifies the daughter.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 11:38 PM
3

Don't know, like I said I used to be a contributor.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 03:53 AM
11

I used to be a contributor to /r/FeMRADebates, where MRA and feminists could discuss various topics. There was always a surplus of MRAs and hardly any feminists because they just couldn't hold their argument up in a fair setting. Eventually the mods took to doing almost anything they could to keep feminists contributing, which took the "fair" element out of place.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:16 AM
3

There's also that final part of the caution, "if you don't say something you later rely on in court". It's much more ambiguous than the US situation. It's interesting that earlier comments imply that police in the UK were enforcing the law even-handedly which caused the feminists to want to re-educate them. Pushing equal treatment along those lines could well be a useful message that gets that advice re-written.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 12:13 AM
3

Best wishes and enjoy your break. Feel free to drop us a line if you want to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/23 07:23 PM
0

We've seen this aplenty in here, almost always from someone who has come to vent, after having a particularly traumatic experience. I think people can forgive that, but not the continued women are evil that a very small minority are pushing. As always, we need to draw the line between women and feminists. They are not the same thing at all, I can discuss the shortcomings of feminism all day without once referring to women as a whole.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:39 AM
9

What, the police are going to start dating some of them?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 06:06 AM
7

Heh, I've just said exactly the same thing elsewhere.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:40 PM
11

Get them sued. Consult a lawyer to see how much you can involve Facebook in it, but definitely go after the women making the comments.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:13 PM
12

They do, they gain protection from being targetted. You can't bitch about someone being a victim of some evil man, and then bitch about that same women being nasty to others, so if you're a public victim then you're safe.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:12 PM
1

What will freak people out is if they wonder why women didn't need to develop high sex drives.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 03:04 AM
57

It's not even to be told they are good, it's just to be shown a slight amount of respect. The other part is that even though they are young, they aren't too stupid, and most can recognise bullshit when they hear it. To be told "being a bigot is wrong", and then to be told "you're evil because you are a man, being a bigot about that is ok" sets off all kinds of bullshit detectors. There's only 1 reason why young men would stick around after hearing that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/23 01:43 PM
12

Best of luck, but delete this post now.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 12:56 AM
7

Google "Big Red". Or take a look at various threads from last time this sort of thing happened. edit: it seems weird for autobot to need to police a link to r -videos, one of the largest default subs around which almost everyone is subscribed to, unless they remove themselves or are banned from, where they couldn't comment anyway.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/23 07:58 PM
7

Oh god, I hope security is solid. Good luck.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/03/23 07:51 PM
3

No, sorry, this is how we want things to be, but not how they are right now. I absolutely love his comments and attitude, but I suspect that this is going to get "put right" on appeal. Even if it does though, that a judge has come out with something like this on a national level has to speak towards changing attitudes across the board. If anyone feels that pushing for equal treatment is a wasted effort, this is the evidence that it isn't, we're having an effect.
/r/MensRights15/03/23 05:01 AM
28

The problem is that it's not an even institution, and everyone knows it. If a marriage breaks down then the income earner [who is male almost always] takes a real hit while the kid nurturer gets a huge benefit. They get the house, the kids and one or two stable incomes, while the income earner gets tossed out on their ear. There's a huge difference in attitudes in marriage. Because of the above a mother is on top of the world, nothing can go wrong. If it does then divorce is an easy way out, and…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/23 02:14 AM
3

Then there's absolutely no excuse for it, or reason except sexism in the classroom, and that should lead to real consequences for those involved. And if they want to do anything at all to try to rebuild the trust of male students, those consequences need to be public. There should be no room for any teachers who discriminate. And I really don't give a toss which direction that discrimination is going, they should be out.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 01:08 AM
6

such activity should be reserved No, there's no justification for this at any point, idgaf how bad you think the target is, you don't do it. The "teachers" who supported this undoubtedly thought they were doing it to evil boys who deserved it.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:51 PM
6

Trying to justify bigotry is always a risky pursuit. This one will probably get clobbered for the ranting.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:03 PM
12

What it will actually do will show them that they are discriminated against. So many men nowadays don't seem to see the obvious, that they are treated as second class citizens just because they are male. These boys have got a heads start on that, so hopefully will be activists from a much younger age.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:00 PM
24

There's quite a few men who have already decided that working with any women closely is asking too much. Of particular concern to feminists are senior lawyers and finance executives who are refusing to mentor women because of the risk to their careers. As you can imagine, this is having an effect on the advancement of women in those professions.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 11:09 PM
4

It's almost impossible to change anyone's point of view if they are vested in it. What you can do is change the minds of onlookers, or forum post readers. Keep your arguments reasonable and consistent, don't lose your cool except under extreme provocation, and be persistent. You can convince a hundred people reading while not convincing the one replying. Conversely, you can alienate a hundred people reading with unreasonable arguments or losing your temper for no good reason. It's tricky to see …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/23 07:17 PM
2

Yeah, I used to have a Scottish girlfriend, and quite a few times up there things got out of the comfort zone. I don't think they are any worse than women anywhere, especially a hen party, but I also don't think they are much if at all better behaved than groups of men. Gendering this law makes no legal sense, it only makes sense from a political perspective.
/r/MensRights11/03/23 03:51 PM
13

It's funny how some people are quite incapable of admitting the truth. The simple fact is that it would take no effort at all to make this law fair to everyone, yet they've gone out of their way to make sure they didn't do that. There may or may not be a "big" problem with women in Scotland being aggressively lewd in public, but it does happen often enough to merit action, and this would have been reasonable. But no, the powers that be can't hold women to account, because of patriarchy. That's w…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 08:22 PM
3

I doubt anyone would seriously believe that it was what she intended, but being able to point out the double standards and hypocrisy in the things they say is always useful.
/r/MensRights10/03/23 12:07 AM
5

Doesn't mean we can't frame it like that though :)
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:51 PM
8

I absolutely agree with her. I'd love to see men achieve gender equality sometime in the new few years.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 07:58 PM
6

Doubling down on her earlier mistakes. Is she that desperate for coverage?
/r/MensRights08/03/23 09:32 PM
2

The £ should have given it away, it's the UK.
/r/MensRights05/03/23 08:01 PM
3

Shhh! If you don't take medicine out of Science then their narrative falls apart. That's patriarchy thinking, that is!
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:35 PM
3

apprentice tradies Previous rate Rate from April 2021 Increase National Living Wage £8.72 £8.91 2.2% 21-22 Year Old Rate £8.20 £8.36 2.0% 18-20 Year Old Rate £6.45 £6.56 1.7% 16-17 Year Old Rate £4.55 £4.62 1.5% Apprentice Rate £4.15 £4.30 3.6% I'd say £4 compared to at least £6 is a hell of a lot less. [note 16-17 year olds are expected to still be at school]
/r/MensRights05/03/23 07:32 PM
18

Poor kid. He's being set up to pay child support in a few years time. This should come with automatic one year custody, and the baby into the foster system.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:56 AM
1

Sure, I was querying whether that was what OP thought based on his title.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 09:47 PM
2

Doh, and there we have someone paying attention. Above edited to make some kind of sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 06:30 PM
2

Ahh yes, that makes more sense, "...from the TERF pov". The way it read it sounded like that was your perspective.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 04:27 PM
2

Are trans-men trans-women, men or women? If you claim they are men then that's going against all trans ideology afaik, if you claim they are women then the trans exclusion that you talk about is not male exclusion. edited: Duh
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 02:01 PM
4

So long as you have the same attitude towards sororities then fair enough.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/03/23 01:57 PM
3

Oh hell no, there's no worse offense. Though again to be fair, the UK police especially the London Met are going through a crisis of respect right now and it isn't pretty for them, so I can understand why senior police would be bothered about it.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 01:05 AM
4

Yeah, as a nurse I have to be careful what things I say, whether it has any relevance to areas I work in or not. Thanks for your reply, it's appreciated especially knowing that even innocuous statements can be twisted by malicious interpretation.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 12:58 AM
3

Possibly, I was curious about the rationale for investigating the guy in the headline.
/r/MensRights03/03/23 12:34 AM
10

Would you get into bother from professional standards for saying that in public?
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:31 PM
-12

It doesn't matter what he believes, it matters how he conducts an inquiry, part of which is a requirement to take an accusation at face value when it's made. Sure there's a ton of false accusations made, but he can't turn round to someone making an accusation and say that. His job is to collect evidence, not deny it exists to the complainant. The problem for me with this article is not that he would be investigated after saying that in a private conversation. He should be, to make sure he is doi…
/r/MensRights02/03/23 06:28 PM
27

The way the wind blows. She gets pushback from her fans, and from other "influencers" who have more followers, and she realises she's in trouble, puts out an apology video. If no one had complained she would not have bothered. She's not showing morals here, just expediency.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/23 01:16 AM
3

Assault is a crime against the person. Perjury is a crime against the system. It's why judges have so much leeway with contempt of court situations.
/r/MensRights01/03/23 03:45 PM
5

Best friends Horseshoe theory does beg one question, everyone talks about the far left becoming far right, not so many about far right becoming far left. If the theory is correct then the switch goes both ways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/23 08:43 PM
12

It's not all women who are coming up with this concept, it's not even most women who support it. They are falling for one of the easiest political traps around "your problems aren't your fault, they are the fault of THOSE PEOPLE, who are responsible for everything wrong with society." Scream and shout about it for a couple of hours, add some hand gestures but they probably don't need to add the mustache, and you have a very familiar situation. Reacting as if it's the whole world against you is a…
/r/MensRights28/02/23 01:37 PM
23

She took a swing and came so close to a hit: Men aren’t naturally stoic: they’re just taught from a young age that feelings and emotions are for girls. They’re taught to lock up their feelings. They’re taught not to put as much value in relationships as women. They’re taught that they’re “less naturally relational .... It’s not porn that’s the problem, it’s patriarchy. ”. And who might be the teachers who teach boys that? The vast majority of people in contact with young boys are women, mothers,…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/02/23 02:14 PM
2

I was with you all the way until that quote from Meghan. I wouldn't trust her as far than I can throw her. As for abortion, I think we've got it just about right in the UK. And yes, feminism certainly hurts women's advocacy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/02/23 01:25 PM
8

Hanlon's razor is responsible for a lot of misconceptions people hold. Never Attribute to Malice That Which is Adequately Explained by Stupidity There's no reason a bad act can't be attributed to malice even if the actor is stupid. A better phrase would be "don't always assume malice for that which can be explained by stupidity".
/r/MensRights25/02/23 01:12 PM
9

So she gave up her studies, didn't want to face a disciplinary panel, and is now dating a russian billionaires son. Should have sent her to jail.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 12:49 AM
14

To solve a social problem the first thing you have to do is get people to agree it's a problem. When you raise these issues in public you often get a strong feminist reaction derailing it or trying to shout it down, rather like the men's conferences in Canada where feminists pulled fire alarms to stop it happening. Women aren't responsible to solve these, but they can help. Feminists generally don't want to solve these problems, the world is pretty much the way they want it now. [note, feminists…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 08:54 PM
1

I'm not sure where I said I'd discriminate against anyone as a group?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/23 12:19 PM
5

Now that's a result. How about doing similar things with some of the more specific issues, like criminal system or family court?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:08 PM
1

That's not actually as bad as I expected. The SPLC reference was expected but unwelcome, perhaps the next question could be "give an overview of bias and corruption in the SPLC". Remember, feminism has been around in different forms for over a century now, men's rights not so much. So the weight of support is correspondingly heavier. It has to take that into account, even if they are just people repeating each other's conclusions. Try "Give me a discussion of the criticisms of feminism with sour…
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:02 PM
0

And do what?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 11:55 PM
0

I've agreed with you on an awful lot of points, but here we diverge. This was someone playing the system to avoid going to a men's prison, and by allowing this put a load of women at risk. The state has a responsibility to protect people, everyone when they are in custody. What would you suggest they do to meet that responsibility?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 11:44 PM
0

Not 100% sure what the comment above this was, but I'm guessing you think I was saying men are rapists. Maybe you should think some time that people are telling the unvarnished truth. No I wasn't having a go at men, I hate that shit as much as you do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 08:20 PM
-1

Not quite, biological women cannot be convicted of rape, except when acting with a man. I suppose it'd be possible with a prosthetic, but very unlikely. Point is though, no matter how much you might be annoyed with women, you wouldn't lock them in with a rapist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 03:48 PM
3

This was more "A plague on both their houses". I'm not interested in supporting Rowling, and I'm not interested in supporting those trying to being her down. They both have a kernel of truth in their arguments, but only that, and they all don't give a fuck about men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 12:10 PM
1

I can understand women being very uncomfortable with the idea of trans-women in refuges/shelters, we've had an issue of a trans-woman convicted rapist being sent to a female prison over here. You can identify as whoever the hell you want to be, but that doesn't mean everyone else has to believe it, and after being abused people in shelters are usually those who are least willing to take anyone at their own word. This does not minimise or exclude the need for shelters for men and trans people, th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 12:03 PM
5

When all the major news sources are shown to be biased to a fairly significant degree, what makes a news source credible?
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:15 AM
3

Oh dear. So it was all politically motivated? What a surprise, I'm so shocked, just like everyone else in here I'm sure.
/r/MensRights22/02/23 11:12 AM
1

There's a poster in the alternative sub to here, /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates who does some fantastic short summaries of issues that men have. His latest one is https://en.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/10yzgdr/when_is_enough_enough/ if you look at his submitted profile you'll see hundreds of sourced, relevant arguments. He's English like both of us. Take a look, you might get some ideas from that.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 12:33 PM
6

Just a nose piercing, foreshadowing really.
/r/MensRights20/02/23 03:55 PM
7

Probably, but screwing around with it like that would make it easier to appeal the decision, all the while keeping the case front and centre in the news embarrassing the hell out of the justice system. It might not sound much but things like that can cause real change.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/23 03:48 PM
9

This needs to go in front of a jury then. I can't imagine the jury that would deny this.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/02/23 03:34 PM
2

I think so, the population of subs like this one are increasing rapidly, and not just because reddit is shutting down alternatives. We'd need to pester the mods to be sure but it feels like there are more varied positive posts about work being done regarding men's circumstances, and there is more positive news about events that highlight men's situations. eg: We've started hearing of fake accusers being sentenced to prison rather than just 2 weeks probation and the whole Johnny Depp thing. The p…
/r/MensRights20/02/23 11:44 AM
3

No no, that's just the BBC and the Guardian pushing that ideal. Men are coming round to the idea that they don't always tell the truth.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:01 PM
1

Iirc there was a report in the 80s saying that both the Soviet Union and the West wouldn't be able to keep up a full on war for longer than 2 weeks before nukes came into play, so it doesn't really matter. Get conscripted, go do training, nukes start flying before you can get shipped out anyway. It might be a good thing to get some basic training and some weapons before the infrastructure goes to shit anyway. Think prepper without needing to do the actual prep.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:00 PM
17

This one does. Shotgun at point blank because she wanted money and to piss the husband off? Evil as fuck.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:30 AM
4

If we're talking about bonds, that sort of bond is fine as a baby but once you want the kids to start developing then it becomes a burden, you want them off the apron strings and looking for independance. Which is more readily obtained from fathers.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:26 AM
10

Article's been removed or deleted. Any mirrors?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:22 AM
26

You have presumably seen the many many times a woman makes an accusation and ends up not being prosecuted or jailed "because it sends the wrong message". The few times it goes further than that they have undisputable proof and are actually being forced to make the case because they can't find any way out of it. Prosecutors and DAs don't want to put women on trial for lying, it messes with their narrative.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:18 PM
2

The UK is exceptionally agressive in pursuing women for lying about rape Like fuck it is. Jemma Beale claimed she had been seriously sexually assaulted by six men and raped by nine, all strangers, in four different incidents over three years. It took 4 years to get her convicted. This was after a man was sentenced to 7 years inside because of her false claims. If "vulnerable women" are concerned about being jailed for making false rape claims then maybe they shouldn't make them.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:14 PM
1

There aren't any limits on sick leave afaik, SSP gets paid as long as you have sick notes from your GP here, at a guess from comments I've seen it's a similar system in Spain. I agree this isn't the best solution but it's difficult to know what that would look like. Spain is reknowned for having a very feminist-orientated government currently, so it's understandable that they would reach out to their supporters leaving men in the cold. But again as I said at the start, there aren't really health…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 03:08 PM
2

Where are you getting the "sick pay at 100%" from? I wouldn't be averse to reducing men's retirement age below women's because of the life expectancy issue, but I think that's a probable non-starter as countries are desperate to fill their pension pots nowadays.
/r/MensRights18/02/23 12:45 PM
2

I've never argued that there's no difference between men and women, that's a politically convenient piece of bullshit. I think people doing the same work should be paid the same. That's fair. As I've argued elsewhere on this thread, if someone is taking advantage of sick time off regularly then that needs addressing by the company. If the obvious differences between men and women cause women to required occasional extra time off then that's acceptable. If this law is put in place to make sure th…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 11:54 AM
1

They don't use the "sick day" system in Spain afaik. I prefer to believe I'm on the side of reality. So Men's rights are required because there's a massive imbalance in the way men and women are treated. In this case there is a significant physical difference between men and women, where women do have the short straw in things that can go wrong. There's a difference between the sexes, so there's an obvious difference between the health requirements of the two. In other words it's already gendere…
/r/MensRights18/02/23 10:21 AM
26

I find that quote from the Swedish minister interesting: “The education system should open doors — not slam them in the face of motivated young women,” That tacitly acknowledges that previous affirmative action had the effect of slamming doors in the faces of motivated young men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/23 05:39 PM
8

Apparently Spain doesn't use the "sick leave" system that's common in the US. Tbh I don't know of any countries that do.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:20 PM
-2

This is one issue that I don't think we get to talk about. It'd be like women butting in on "free prostate checks over 40 for men". That said, if there's significant consideration given to women's health and none to men's then that's a conversation topic.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 04:19 PM
6

That's up to them though, if they go soft on her then other people will want the law to go soft with them as well. Plus, she filmed it, in Dubai. That's got to piss some of their population off, saying it's easy to take drugs over there. There's nothing that the UK can officially do, or should do, to change the outcome of this. It's a reasonable punishment for a crime committed in Dubai.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/23 01:44 PM
9

Why shouldn't she do jail time? She broke the law over there, hell even had a video of it, it'd be sending a bad message if they didn't jail her.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/23 01:26 PM
25

Why do you assume we want her back?
/r/PussyPassDenied17/02/23 10:23 AM
1

I'm happy she got 5 years. It's perjury or perverting the course of justice, not rape she's been convicted of. The important part is that she actually got convicted and she was sentenced to significant jail time. What I'd really like to see is having to sign the sex offenders register, that way people would know the effects of the false accusations.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/02/23 09:26 AM
-5

So a judge saying you aren't getting a bail discount is referred to as refusing bail? I find that hard to believe. You still can get bail, it's just at the original amount.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 10:33 PM
1

Ahh, that's what you meant, ok. I still think that it's a fools errand, instead of putting it on facebook put it to the police, even if they can't do anything immediately it'll help. And if/when it does become actionable then you're able to support the case. Putting it on facebook before you do that is begging for a defence lawyer to call it collusion and get the case dropped.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 05:14 PM
3

Easy, I've been a nurse for over 30 years and spent a fair bit of that time in residences with a whole bunch of other nurses. You'd be amazed at the conversations. A lot of women just don't have any filters at all. Funnily enough, the post above deals with people making all sorts of claims, none of which they can back up. I also refer you to your question above: "how do I obtain clout for lying about rape?" Because it helps you in an argument like this? Note, I'm not saying you are lying here, i…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:46 PM
6

BURN HIM! THE PERVERT!!!!!! Thinking about it, wouldn't that definition cover sex using birth control as well? Or was that what you were talking about?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 04:13 PM
3

Oh come off, we've seen it done. I've seen women do it. And when you talk to other women about it they say the same thing, that they're making up the claim for sympathy and attention. To paraphrase, women have been getting away w this shit bc everyone feels sorry for them [women are wonderful effect]. And the whole world knows it, but no one really wants to tackle it legally just yet. But that's coming. It's like the first accusation made by a woman "you can't get sex so you're lashing out". Wom…
/r/MensRights13/02/23 04:12 PM
6

Yeah, that was the impression I got, sodomy is sex with someone else that's not intending to cause pregnancy.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 03:59 PM
6

Heh, yeah, I'm sure none of you make up shit for the sake of clout, you'd never do that would you? One of the real problems we have is that people spout the shit "Women rarely fabricate stories like this", when police records are full of them. Women lie. Not all of them, probably not most of them, but there's a bunch that do, and if you were being honest with us and yourself you'd accept that. But we know how it's going to play out, so don't worry, no one will come after you for lying here.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:57 PM
40

Strange how the article is trying to frame her topping herself as a bad thing. Love how the article is titled: "... after judge refuses bail" and in the middle of the article says "She had also appealed for bail, however, at the bail hearing earlier this month, a judge refused to lower Ketcham’s bail from $350,000 to $50,000." Journo is desperate to give her the pussypass.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 12:48 PM
11

Sodomy is also the term used to describe oral sex.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/23 12:44 PM
10

This is basically doxxing, along with anti-social comments added. The obvious response is to take a few hundred of the men posted on there, make them aware of it, along with a contact number for a good libel lawyer. When Facebook starts being included in the lawsuits then the whole concept will get shut down really fast.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:42 AM
1

When someone can say "their eye flickered and that's why they are unfit" then that's bloody subjective. Grow up and smell the shit you're peddling.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 09:40 PM
2

Yes, I'm sure that police cars and personal cameras are in full HD able to record the minutest detail, never suffer damage or lose data, and are able to record through obstacles like bodies blocking the view.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 05:07 PM
0

Not really, there are two problems with it. Firstly, the driver may have a health condition that affects any of those tests. Secondly, the interpretation of the results of the tests are subjective. The police officer has to make a determination whether the response is a pass or a fail, and that is subject to the perceptions and the prejudices of the officer. Worse, that can always be questioned in court, so if an officer decides over 2 weeks that 3 black men are over the limit that can be brough…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 05:05 PM
-2

From what I've seen, your field sobriety tests are based on very subjective determinations by an officer, and is only there to supply extra ammunition in court. " Yes, your honour, they failed the field test" "How exactly did they do that?" "Oh, by swinging their foot out a little bit" "Prove it". Get an objective system in place for everyone, it's the only fair way to go.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/02/23 02:48 PM
11

I believe you're trying to force a point that was never implied in the first place. But I might be wrong, if you could post a copy of a marriage contract we could take a look.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 01:05 PM
13

Heh, that's hilarious. Abuse given, and tolerated due to semantics. Try this then: "Witholding sex is considered abuse". That's the official terminology, unless you think they have their semantics wrong as well?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:30 PM
18

That's a very interesting view also, considering denying someone intimacy and sex is considered abuse. I guess the message here is it's ok if a woman does it, not ok if a man does it?
/r/MensRights12/02/23 12:01 PM
8

Almost all students studying psychology are doing it to try to understand themselves, and how they got screwed up that way. That said, the girls a psychopath and as you say, should never be allowed within 100 miles of a career in mental heatlth.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/02/23 12:36 PM
49

UK law: Has there been any recent case law? In 2015, Sir James Munby (as President of the Family Division of the High Court of England and Wales) handed down a judgment in care proceedings relating to two children, a brother and sister, which considered both NTMC and FGM (female genital mutilation). After some consideration in his judgment, Munby concluded that ‘“reasonable” parenting is treated as permitting male circumcision’. He went on to state that ‘although both [FGM and NTMC] involve sign…
/r/MensRights11/02/23 10:14 AM
9

Men generally aren't prone to UTIs. The STI reduction is minimal and very arguable, the evidence was collected in a dubious manner. "Penile problems" are MUCH more likely following a circumcision, especially the chance of death., something parents don't seem to be told about prior to consenting. I'd love to see the stats on penile cancer. Feel free to give a source that quotes figures, your source there reads like a sales brochure.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 10:03 AM
48

Money does seem to be the reason for most vile attitudes being pushed as fine by authorities.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 09:48 AM
6

It's the Guardian, double standards are what it lives on.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/02/23 06:57 PM
2

I wonder how many of the studies that complain about age gaps take into account the person running the study is not of an age where they attract that kind of attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/02/23 06:54 PM
3

It's a shame that this type of thing is coming between men and women, seeing someone struggling is a trigger for some of us, we just want to help out. But the commentor was correct about it, it's going to take a hell of a lot of work from women calling out those who are using the situation to get clicks etc before men will feel at all comfortable helping out. Even in the original video that caused the problem in the first place, you could see the guy debating with himself whether to try to help …
/r/MensRights06/02/23 02:56 PM
2

Single mother? Why am I not surprised.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 12:16 PM
6

I think this is a normal occurence of people having more choices in life. Used to be 99% of women settled down to have kids, now it's not so much and not having so many, so a decline in birthrate is the outcome. I wouldn't be at all concerned about it if it weren't for the ponzi scheme governments have with pensions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 01:20 AM
1

Seriously, why care about anyone calling someone that?
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:07 PM
5

If 75% of the workforce are women, then men have already left their jobs. This means the place is full of people who have just come in, this usually puts a heavy load on experienced staff. If the women have been brought in to make up diversity numbers then they are anecdotally notoriously unskilled making the workload even worse for the regular staff.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 11:20 PM
4

What I find insane is the concept that we live in a democracy, where numbers of votes in favour of a representative matters, and people go all out to try to piss off anyone who isn't on their side. I mean, where do they think the extra votes have to come from? If I were a politician trying to get elected, I'd be down on my hands and knees begging the people who don't really like me much to come on over and talk to me. The last thing I'd want is for someone on my side to piss them off.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 12:40 PM
2

I am, in the context that it's a problem a man has and is his own fault. It's pretty hypocritical for anyone to object to slut shaming a woman yet do effectively exactly the same thing to a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 12:37 PM
6

Of course! It means if men join feminist organisations they will no longer be incels... Does that mean feminists are using sex to recruit men? This might be a popular move.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 03:28 AM
12

"Either you're a feminist, or you're an OTHER! Evil, women-hating OTHERS. Part of the OUT GROUP." That seems to be the emotional argument, either you're with us or against us. The EW version is you're with us whether you like it or not. Which is pretty appalling really, when you think what their opinion of men is. "You are with us, but we do not acknowledge you as an equal". Hints of Anakin there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/02/23 03:25 AM
13

Stanford affirmed gender equality in a statement to The Fix. “We are committed to gender equity and an inclusive learning environment free from discrimination, That's not what their statement said.
/r/MensRights02/02/23 02:04 AM
104

Or she's just fucking stupid and greedy. You don't need to look for reasons beyond those.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/01/23 11:50 AM
2

Now I'm feeling personally attacked :p The idea that we are being manipulated by people who do not have our best interests at heart is an old conspiracy tale, with the added bonus of being relatively accurate. The hard part seems to be identifying who is doing the manipulating, the feminists think it's men somehow, at our weekly patriarchy meeting, the matrix thinks it's AI, some people think it's little grey aliens, but most of us think it's politicians of all stripes and sexes. I can't comment…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/23 09:54 AM
1

https://en.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/10mjxvh/kotaku_put_out_an_article_bashing_the_mens_rights/j6embky/
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:38 AM
1

Don't make the mistake of thinking I'm pro-feminist, feel free to look through my previous posts on here to correct your mistake.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 09:03 PM
1

It's a venn diagram, most SJW are feminists but some aren't, most feminists are SJW but some [a few] aren't.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 08:27 PM
1

So this is the point where you attack the poster rather than the post. Ok. I've detailed my reasons for disliking feminism, none of them have to do with their purported aims, rather than what they actually do. If feminists actually did what they said they would, and were interested in egalitarianism there wouldn't be a problem. I don't know where you got equality is not worth fighting for. If you mean the terrorism? That's a different argument. You do not get to say where I am welcome or not, at…
/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:25 AM
7

A very long reply, but none of your points stand. First wave feminism. I assume you mean the suffragettes. So terrorists for a start, firebombs and such. Also advocating for votes for women when votes for men wasn't a thing. Votes for certain men sure, rich/landlord types, your average coal-miner, not so much. So they were seperate and biased right from the start. As well as being terrorists, let's never forget that. Slide 7 onwards. You seem to miss/ignore the point, feminism, toxic masculinity…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:07 PM
9

So the name, feminism, is all-inclusive which is why they picked a name like that, to show how inclusive they are. Similarly, patriarchy was named because it's something that affect everyone and is a society-caused concern. Come off it. It's blatant the bias and hatred of men that is inherent in feminism. I mean, toxic masculinity?? Where's your concept for toxic feminity, like trying to get a pussy pass, or trying to close women's jails because of reasons, yet having nothing to say about men be…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 07:17 PM
13

Where do you think the majority of issues for men are propogated nowadays? Men have always had problems, but there were things that made up for it, the knowledge that you were providing for a family and that your hard work was respected. Along comes feminism and rather than trying to help women it mutates into a "shit on men" movement. If you actually do follow both sides, you'll have seen the hypocrisy and double standards that are in play here, and understand that the biggest road-block standi…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 05:22 PM
31

K*taku is so appalling with regards to SJW activity that it's got it's own fan sub on reddit which details most of the crap they come up with, and ended up being ground zero for the gamergate saga. Of course, that was described as "an attack on women" rather than "journalists being corrupt as fuck".
/r/MensRights27/01/23 05:06 PM
18

preserving critical funding sources and infrastructure to serve victims That quote should include "to serve victims and PAY those who fight for the paycheck them" Along with everything else, it's a well paid scam, which is why you'll never satisfy them, the moment they acknowledge there's no need for them anymore they're out of a job.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 04:57 PM
2

The Uk is in the process of scaling them up to be equal, but you can't do it just like that, people get upset if all of a sudden they have 2 more years to work before retiring. Even doing it gradually has lead to legal challenges by women's groups, not 100% undeservedly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/23 06:07 AM
9

The important thing is not how much more harm does a man come to during his working life, but how much more does he contribute towards the taxes that pay retirement benefits.* When you take that into account it becomes obvious that there's no way in hell they are going to reduce the retirement age for men, if anything they'll be looking for any way they can to increase it. * according to politicians.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/23 11:08 PM
6

There's a bit of an issue there. Companies don't want to hire younger women who are likely to want to start a family thus taking lots of time off, now you say they don't want to hire older women because of menopausal-related issues. So what's the right age for a woman to go to work? [Yeah, I know the women eventually need to go to work regardless, but this is about the opinion of the company that employs them]
/r/MensRights24/01/23 06:41 PM
10

There already are. Apparently therapists are refusing to accept single mid 30s women as clients in the US North East right now because so many are "traumatised" at not having the husband/kids, and not looking like they are going to.
/r/MensRights22/01/23 10:22 PM
11

Yeah, but it doesn't work.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/01/23 01:12 AM
13

So an alternative would be we could enforce women getting their eggs harvested at 14. Let's get it done, after all, we own the patriarchy so this shouldn't be difficult to do. PS, don't forget the secret meeting Tuesday night.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 12:39 AM
3

Probable cause for a license plate check? Get with the 21st century, it's automatic nowadays.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/23 11:16 PM
2

Upholding the law like needing to have a current valid license before you're allowed to put the public at risk with your driving?
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/23 11:14 PM
5

I'm sure if there was even a sniff of alcohol in all that he'd have done her for being drunk.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/23 11:11 PM
110

From the youtube comments: Nicole has a lengthy record starting in 2007; criminal traffic offenses, at least one battery, and many bail jumping charges. Her jail sentences were always stayed. All of the bail jumping charges were dismissed. Her behavior in the video is because she's learned that she can do whatever she wants and there won't be any consequences. She got out of there with citations for seatbelts and driving while suspended. This isn't PPD.
/r/PussyPassDenied20/01/23 11:08 PM
11

"The Patriarchy" is used as a derailing tactic to either dismiss the topic or change it to something other than men's health, it's there on that page to get rid of that option in a discussion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/23 04:56 PM
10

Think of a scale from 1-10, all femiinists are respresented on that scale with the number relating to how much they support men's rights. Those with a 10 and some with a 9 will be wanting to help men, the rest either aren't bothered or make videos about male tears. Your opinion does not hold true for all feminists or even most of them.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:42 PM
15

Being helpful, being informative, yup, upvotes.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 11:32 PM
3

You ran into the "men's pov vs women's pov" issue. Arguments came from both sides about how they have it worse, but the women supporters outnumber the men supporters on there so the men end up dv to hell. There were a couple of sensible suggestions imo, so if you like you could follow those, but tbh trying to get objective support for any gendered issue nowadays is a non-starter.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 05:15 PM
42

Men are half of society. Helping male victims of domestic abuse helps society by definition.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/23 01:52 PM
4

Time kills all, including ogres. We keep on doing what we're doing now, and eventually we get to stage 3 [we're in 2 right now].
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/01/23 12:20 AM
15

Out of area link
/r/PussyPassDenied12/01/23 08:20 PM
4

Of course it's the mothers, and the elementary school teachers, there's even sayings about it "as the twig is bent so the bough grows", and “Give me a child until he is 7 and I will show you the man”. That last one is from Aristotle 300 BC, so it's not exactly news.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:17 PM
3

Arguing any of this on reddit is a balancing act, you can sometimes get your point of view across but you will usually end up getting massively downvoted. If you go a bit heavy handed you get banned from the sub. That said, there does seem to be some pendulum swing happening over the last six months, I've seen positive commentary in various subs where there wasn't any before. So some of the message is starting to get through.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 05:44 PM
50

Letting it go unopposed is how we got into this mess in the first place. "Being the better person" doesn't always get the result you want, especially when the other person is willing to lie repeatedly to get their result.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 04:24 PM
4

Murder is murder, I don't see one as being any better than the other. No, I wasn't "getting pissy". I think you've confused me with someone else. I've had one UTI in my life, due to a catheter. Other than that, nearly 60 years without. It really is a hygiene thing, and having a circumcision as an alternative to having a wash is crackers. Circumcisions do not prevent STD infections. They might reduce the chance, [note MIGHT, because the study that asserted this was definitely flawed] but they are…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 02:32 PM
3

This isn't the only experiment along those lines. Publishing data has been a problem with the threats of malpractise etc. Take a look at the links at the bottom of the page.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:43 PM
4

Except that's the conclusion that the doctors came to. So you can call it disrespectful if you want, so long as you call it accurate too. And I don't see it as a problem, if someone comes up to you and chops off a part of your body, that's very likely to give you traumatic memories.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:29 PM
6

Not circumcised thank fuck. But did you bother to read the article? PTSD isn't something you "remember" And babies do very little else except eat, shit, sleep and form memories. How the hell do you think you learned to walk?
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:23 PM
-2

I'm sure you're trying to make a point there, but I've no idea what it is. Please elaborate?
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:17 PM
4

Is it bad that girls have their genitals cut? Yes. Is it bad that boys have their genitals cut? Yes. That's all that matters, no one cares about the "surgery type" apart from people trying to say one has it worse than the other, which is a divisive and pointless argument. In this case I mean it divides the community that think kids shouldn't be mutilated. There's no advantage to MGM, that BS has been debunked a while back. I assume there's no advantage to FGM, in this case I'm guessing that no o…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 01:16 PM
8

they can't form memories Acchewally...
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:46 AM
13

It can have a psychological effect as well, even if the circumcision was spot on. It's possible that men with botched circumcisions can have a satisfactory sex life. There's a lot more to the problem than just the effect on your sex life though, this and plenty of other reasons is why it should be left to adult men to decide for themselves if they want to be circumcised.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:41 AM
7

It's possible to remove too much skin, you're talking about a baby penis, missing the optimal point by half a centimetre could mean quite a lot when you consider the effect as an adult. Yet another reason to keep elective circumcisions to adults only.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:38 AM
9

It's really irrelevant who "has it worse". It's violating any concept of body autonomy so it should be illegal until they can consent for themselves.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:28 AM
-10

It doesn't do anything, except limit your sensation during sex.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:22 AM
57

And that one is apparently the most common form by far.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 12:22 AM
2

Oh of course not, it's what they wanted after all. On a similar note, had a bunch of sickos talking about the Andrew Tate issue upvoting that he was probably going to get raped in prison.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 03:31 PM
1

New year, new gf. This one certainly isn't worth the hassle.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 11:33 PM
27

"Affairs". I wonder if they're going to discuss power imbalances here?
/r/MensRights05/01/23 09:03 PM
33

Of course they've failed men and boys. They've spent so long blindly supporting feminism that they've either failed to see the problems they've caused, or they are so far in hock to feminist political support that they can't do anything about it. I'm really angry about it, because I'm another life-long left-winger, and these fuckers have hijacked the political party meant for working men and women away from all of us. We aren't the priority nowadays, we are the enemy. I refuse to vote for the To…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/01/23 09:12 PM
9

Sexual assault carries the max sentence of life also, but the average sentence is a lot lower, as is the starting sentence that they apply modifiers to. Also when people are researching things like rape statistics, sexual assault is not included, leading to the myth that women can't rape men, it's a continual circle.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/01/23 12:02 AM
14

We're in a very antagonistic period for men, I've never seen the anti-male narrative being so hostile. Whether that's an indication of more individual events being reacted to by the media, I don't know. It's certainly being noticed by men in general though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/01/23 12:11 PM
3

This is always to be expected from those sites and accounts "especially for women", a singular contempt for any problems men have. You can see this in the huffpo for women above, the UN women's account, and any newspaper female section, including the Guardian and the Mail. The political stance of the newspaper doesn't seem to make any difference.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 02:16 PM
1

Yeah, improving all people's lives should be the aim, with the proviso that we don't emphasise one group too much over another. That's the real problem with feminism, they are improving women's lives directly at the expense of mens, treating it as a zero-sum game when it doesn't have to be. Imo feminism is the major political influence working against men. There's certainly other problems, conservative views on men are not helpful at best [traditional gender roles etc], but those views are gener…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:49 PM
1

Day 4: Man looking around at utter devastation; Wow honey, I'm sorry we got taken and you have to fight off the alien invasion all by yourselves. It must have been horrendous.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:32 PM
1

I like the way crimes are rated currently, you have a given severity with a sentence reccommended, and then add and subtract various modifiers. Problem is that those modifiers are too generous in crimes that don't result in a 10 year sentence, and then the actual crime being prosecuted can vary so much in a final sentence based on the discretion of the prosecution. Eg, murder of various degrees, manslaughter etc. Often dropping down a level of severity is excused because it makes it more likely …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:27 PM
3

It's hypocrisy like this that's had me wondering about the political parties I support for a while now, and some of the people in them. I saw a thread on Tate earlier and someone was saying that he should look forward to being a bottom in prison. They of course claimed to be left wing. I'm not religious but this phrase always seemed appropriate "You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/12/22 11:59 AM
17

Ooooh, a troll! Not seen one of those since.. yesterday. redditor for 1 hour, -22 karma, I'd trust a Frenchie over you any day.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:49 AM
8

Where is she still a child, she's 19?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:41 AM
23

Heh, go tell any Frenchman that Napoleon had "small dick energy" and you'll come back without your teeth.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:39 AM
20

Oh I got absolutely hammered yesterday because I dared to mention that. Had someone screaming at me for "ableist" insults while doing his level best to ignore the hypocrisy of what she was saying.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:35 AM
3

It's one of those awkward ones, most of the time it was ok, then for a couple of weeks it got really really bad. Imo this was roughly balanced, and marriage then was a partnership. Since then the perils of childbirth have been a priority for medicine, so the balance has shifted. Labour saving devices in the home have made it even more unbalanced. In one way this is good, the idea being that women have taken the lead in having a better life, with the intent to bring men's lives up to match them. …
/r/MensRights30/12/22 12:13 AM
4

I wasn't at all trying to say men don't have issues, of course they do, that's why we are here. I was commenting on this: women were fine doing the easiest job - being a housewife. and pointing out that at that time it was not an easy or safe job at all.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 06:08 PM
4

From a work perspective I agree, but you shouldn't underestimate the issues of having children in a pre-industrial society. Fatalities of both mother and child during childbirth were common, and long-term illnesses related to childbirth were also prevalent. It was no easy road being a mother back then. Nowadays, it might be a different situation.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 04:28 PM
2

I honestly have no idea who that is, except someone with a lot of cars apparently. Don't know and don't care. But I am bothered about her choice of language there, and the way everyone seems to think it's ok.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:30 PM
3

If she wants to have a go at someone she's more than welcome to do so, within the scope of the argument. She could have said anything she wanted about him being a moron about carbon emissions, but she went to "small dick". So screw her, she deserves the backlash.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 02:11 PM
3

I lost interest at the "Feminist website" point. It's been obvious for years that feminism is the enemy of men's rights, so why anyone should be surprised at this diatrabe I don't know. I'd much prefer if we just put them on ignore, I'm sure some of them are seeing this post as a victory, that MRAs are offended enough to post about it so they did good. Why we keep giving them morale boosts I don't know.
/r/MensRights29/12/22 11:24 AM
32

How can it be wild when that is exactly what it is? Are you a woman? Yes? Here have some food. Are you a woman? No? are you in a relationship with a woman? Yes? Here, have some food. Are you a woman? No? are you in a relationship with a woman? No? Sorry, you're going hungry. It wasn't a "notion", it was UN policy. And that is as real misandry as you ever don't want to encounter. Don't try to minimise it, this needs calling out every time the UN wants donations.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/22 11:04 AM
10

"I can't talk because no one is letting me speak!" People saying it's drugs, or pride, imo it's just being really really dumb.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/22 11:57 AM
39

When claiming DV is the first thing you do in a divorce case, and the Aussie legal system says that now takes priority..
/r/PussyPassDenied23/12/22 11:29 AM
7

Baby steps. First things first, this is a surprisingly positive post.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 01:32 PM
14

As long as feminists maintain their support of the concepts of toxic masculinity and patriarchy they are never going to get my respect. It firmly puts me on the other side to them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/12/22 02:52 PM
25

The "we feel your pain" was sarcastic. The article was a load of crap right from the start.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 12:45 PM
3

How are you meant to "be responsible" while you are drunk? Isn't that the definition of "not being able to be responsible"?
/r/MensRights18/12/22 12:58 AM
5

It's as if women's sports never gets shown on TV. They do, at least over here anyway, and the viewing figures are not impressive. Not seeing any efforts to cancel the anchor though?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 04:02 PM
6

I think the people in here don't need convincing that there's a problem with men's issues, it's the people not in here that need showing. So long as an interviewer isn't actively hostile to the concepts and are willing to consider your points at face value it's worth pursuing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/22 01:04 AM
1

Hope she's going to have to pay for cleaning them both.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/12/22 12:13 PM
4

Have they provided the numbers to back up their claims? We'd need to know percentages of race and sex in the general population and the police force. Or is this just a hand-waving exercise?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:21 AM
14

Then there's no problem with women doing exactly the same qualification tests that men face.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 09:00 PM
5

It's a culture problem that needs changing. The problem we have is that no one is interested in men's issues, only in women's. As you've said several times, this was started by a women being killed for not being dressed correctly. Only it wasn't, that was just the most recent event that people paid attention to. It's the erasure of men as having legitimate complaints that's the problem, as you have done a few times in here. One woman died. Many men have died. Who gets talked about?
/r/MensRights14/12/22 03:59 PM
1

https://newatlas.com/medical/ectolife-artifical-womb-facility/ https://www.bizsiziz.com/ectolife-concept-unveiled-for-the-worlds-first-artificial-womb-facility/ Yeah, it's real apparently.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 01:07 PM
3

Heh, I didn't think you were, I was just referring to the idea that men only cry because of misogyny that feminists do seem to have.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/22 12:11 PM
3

I remember crying over a dog that'd died a few years previously.. I'm not sure where the misogyny was in that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/12/22 04:23 AM
1

I don't see it as a competition. I'd go with both are really bad and shouldn't happen to anyone.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:24 AM
1

While I'm a fan of actions coming back to bite you, remember we're talking about rape here, there's never a justification for wishing it on someone and victims of it deserve compassion.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:17 AM
5

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=male%20tears https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/male-tears But if we just took it at face value then what would it be saying to us, "We love seeing men cry, we are happy to cause emotional turmoil to men". Whichever way you take it, they look like awfully shitty people.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 09:01 PM
8

Male tears is slang for semen. So all these feminists drinking mugfulls of male tears... oops.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 08:40 PM
23

Men are much more likely to contribute towards women's shelters than for men. This needs to be a government supported scheme.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:43 PM
7

I'm assuming that the funding that would normally go to these shelters won't be needed so can go towards men's shelters instead?
/r/MensRights12/12/22 02:36 PM
62

When feminists regularly show up with mugs etc saying "male tears" it shows how much they don't value men being open in an emotional sense. Despite the hilarious alternative meaning to the phrase. Men being emotional is a sop to the concept of toxic masculinity: "if you were more emotional women wouldn't get harmed so much" yet the usual consequence to a man being emotional in a relationship is the end of said relationship. So it's a non-starter for fixing problems, it's a scam. The only real op…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/12/22 12:12 PM
16

It's possible to have views from both left and right without becoming an extremist. For example I'd love to see universal healthcare for all in more countries, I'm also a fan of living wages, holiday and sick pay for employees, but do I feel the need to start setting up gulags? Not right now, maybe later. The problems are the public image of MRAs being generally rather poor, and the political forces trying to keep it that way. Now this generally CAN be tied to the left, in the form of feminism, …
/r/MensRights12/12/22 03:49 AM
17

They dont have balls that they have to shave. Neither do you, at least I can't think of a reason why you'd HAVE to shave them? As for "real men", yeah, there's probably a psych term for it, but the intent is to emotionally blackmail you into doing something they want you to do. "A REAL MAN would carry my shopping up 4 flights of stairs for me", "A real man wouldn't dream of telling me his problems, because I'm too selfish and self-absorbed to consider other people's problems are something for me…
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:44 AM
1

Nah, that would have been chopping Reaper peppers into it.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 07:38 AM
10

Just been having an argument with someone who was saying DV numbers don't really matter, it's about how many men or women get killed because of it that matters. It's shifting the goalposts yet again of course, but it's made me curious, are there any stats available on causes of deaths in relationships that cover the whole gamut of issues, including death from suicide because of relationship failure/withholding of affection or lack of family contact post-divorce? I know it's unlikely to be availa…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/12/22 12:30 AM
2

I know it was some celebrity over there but I couldn't tell you which one. This was literally something she did to herself, so I don't see how he can be blamed, I'm pretty sure he didn't encourage her to do it.
/r/MensRights11/12/22 12:20 AM
12

Personally I liked the hot sauce option, spermicidal and notification that the girl you're with is a scammer all in one.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:17 PM
28

Condoms. It's there, just not particularly liked. Just make sure they are your own condoms, and always use and dispose of them.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 12:36 PM
2

Rappers are expected to be mindless thugs, Will Smith was expected to be better than that.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:54 AM
1

Funnily enough I have feminists demanding that I identify the company I work for I glad you told them where to go.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 05:45 PM
6

Basic internet security, keep your real life and your online life seperate. More basic internet security, if you don't feel comfortable talking to certain people, stop talking to them, you don't have to be here. Are you really that enamoured of being a troll that you do shit like this?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 11:17 PM
9

Not 100% sure what you meant, but you said ask you anything so here goes: Why do you use an alt for posting in here instead of your main? Are the majority of your opinions so appalling you don't want anyone to realise?
/r/MensRights08/12/22 10:11 PM
6

Pick-me is an insult used by feminists aimed at women who support men's rights. Not a clue what chameleon is meant to mean though. I expect a certain amount of vitriol on here as it's a place to vent as much as anything. The same can be said about the main feminist subs, which is one reason I don't go on them. The problem comes when it's a non-gender ideology sub where you get harrassed for being a mra. You're a mod. Why don't you suggest either a tag for posts or even a seperate sub for venting…
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:18 PM
16

You are assuming that they intend to be fair, impartial, and wanting to know the facts. News of most sorts nowadays is about pushing an agenda.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:03 PM
2

So what? Accept it and be proud of it. They don't have an answer to that. Don't have a meltdown, don't apologise, you can either say "yeah, I support men's rights, why don't you?" or you can give examples if you like "Sure, I think 80% of homeless people deserve some support", or whichever is your particular bugbear. Almost all of the time they shut up immediately, as they've never considered there might be a good reason for it. Not my proudest example, but I was irritated.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 09:01 PM
1

Treat their involvement with her the same as with any other girl, there's no reason for you to lose friends because of this. If it gets too tense, just tell them "right, we're taking a break for a few months, and I'll give you a call after that, once this is over." Avoid any input from either side about their dating.
/r/MensRights08/12/22 08:43 AM
10

Boys and men are strong and can look after themselves. Girls and women are weak and need help. That's the justification for it, and back in the stone age it might have been accurate. Nowadays in times when virtually everything can be automated it's irrelevant. People who are struggling need our help, whether that be a man or a woman. Yet as you pointed out, there's a ton of help available for women, and virtually nothing for men. Neglecting boys and men is not the sign of a caring person, or a c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/22 11:22 PM
2

I think that might be what you need to tell her, and be prepared to take appropriate steps whatever her response is, but I'm not an expert in this kind of thing. This sounds a fair bit more than feminist raging, she sounds like she needs to see a doctor for her own state of mind.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 06:03 PM
1

I don't know if you're still in therapy but this sounds a bit too complicated to just throw advice at, I'd strongly suggest talk to your therapist. I know they are very reluctant to give advice, but they might be able to offer a range of suggestions that you can look at to see what works for you.
/r/MensRights07/12/22 09:28 AM
1

Jealousy.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:26 PM
6

That's a hell of a stretch. And remember, you can be convicted of a false accusation only if you can't show that it could be true. eg, the accused was in another country at the time. If there's a possibility that the accusation is true then there's no consequence, it gives you reasonable doubt. Meaning if someone were to be assaulted after making a false accusation, there's no likelihood of a real accusation ending the same way.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:15 PM
1

Not bad, that'd be roughly what's being asked for imo. And DA/CPS who won't enforce the law "because it might look bad" are bottom dwellers of the worst kind.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 03:11 PM
39

Why? The sex offenders registry is open so that people can check on people they know to see if they are on it. If you get involved with a girl who has a record of false accusations you should be able to find out in exactly the same way.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:56 AM
19

It's asking for making a false report to the police of sexual assault to be made a specific criminal offence.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:36 AM
55

Add it to the sex offenders registry, seems like the obvious place to put it.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 12:34 AM
3

Not with a patent of nobility it doesn't.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:37 PM
3

Ooooh, ok, that makes them even more daft. Except now it could well be Philip. In which case, add it to the list.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:51 PM
16

I'll keep that one in the "yeah, maybe" category. Not doubting that someone would possibly be daft enough to say something like that to their spouse, but if so how did Meghan get to hear about it? One thing the Royal family isn't is blind to the effect of casual comments. Except Phillip. Phillip was incredible, and I could believe he said this in a second, except he didn't have a husband.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:46 PM
13

If it happened, then sure, but do we have any details of what was claimed?
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:32 PM
14

Diana has had the benefit of "don't speak ill of the dead" and "women are wonderful" and "don't criticise the monarchy without a damn good reason" for so long she's become a national treasure, no matter her part in their divorce, she did seem to have a thing for rugby players. And yes, ironically she definitely did use the press for her own benefit. She certainly knew what to expect, her family dates back to the 1600s.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 06:30 PM
2

Ok, that's a plainly idiotic take. Not impressed Stewart.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 02:48 AM
5

"Think"? You mean you think men get taken seriously when they report sexual assault from a woman? Heh. Just 1 word will do it: "Nice...." Don't believe me? Take a look at the hundreds of personal stories on this sub alone that demonstrate a world-wide lack of empathy for men who've been assaulted or raped.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:22 PM
5

Possibly and warranted in this example, but at least you wouldn't get laughed at or ignored.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 03:03 PM
4

Or you him, that goes both ways. But if you both falsely accused each other of sexual assault, only one of you would be taken seriously. Funny how that works out.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:58 PM
5

Nope, it's self-protection. There's no law saying you have to take private meetings with members of the opposite sex. So you can forget networking, going for a drink after a rough case, or any of that shit. You can have a classroom meet with 10 of your other colleagues, that's all you're getting.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 01:38 PM
67

As written by a law-student. Any minute now she's going to run into the problem that no male lawyer is going to be willing to mentor her, because it puts them too much at risk of MeToo/false accusations. At which point we'll get another dodgy post claiming that's discrimination. Well, you made your bed. Hope it's comfortable.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 02:55 AM
18

Right at the end of all the activism there's going to be one subject left, "mechanical enginnering with respect to nightlights" that still has a greater male than female uptake, and that'll be the justification for all the biases that they throw at women and away from men. These people dgaf about men, only how they can shape the argument to make it sound like women have a raw deal.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:11 PM
1

No, never to hit anyone that hasn't already hit you. Simple.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 03:00 AM
9

It's not a hill to die on, but it is a fantastic example of how child support isn't child support anymore. What court could reasonably suggest that a kid needs $2.4 million a year to survive? Obviously there's other factors involved, which is our argument when someone says "but the courts have only the best interests of the child at heart". We do need a link to back this post up though.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:48 PM
34

A better one might be: society is biased in favour of women. A singular judge is more likely to stray outside the norms of fairness than 12 jurists would be.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/11/22 04:55 PM
0

You are mistaking a stalemate for a victory.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 05:03 PM
2

So you're saying we don't need to worry about laws being unfair or biased, we can just find a fix for each problem that causes? That's treating the symptoms, not the disease. Also it's putting the onus on the victim not to be a victim. Sure, protection is a great idea, but if for some reason the guy trusted the girl and she ends up pregnant, he's still up the creek. And with no legal system change, he can't defend himself.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 04:47 PM
1

It's that second part that everyone is getting exercised about, and there's no way most legal systems would consider it, remembering that even examples of statutory rape aren't exonerated from paying child support.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:56 PM
4

His method might take quite a while, you didn't offer an alternative in either post.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:49 PM
6

If stealthing is considered rape, then lying about BC is the same thing.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 01:42 PM
8

Not at all, he discussed his preferences before and after conception, and he was not given any choice in the matter. Authority = responsibility, she decided she wanted to make the decision to keep the kid alone, so that's her responsibility.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:45 PM
9

It's the same sort of thing as people at work putting someone down, it's intent is to raise themselves up. All it really does is show people how insecure and incompetent they are.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:40 PM
1

Dan Moore writes to the women supporting Men's Rights. Hopefully we can all get behind this.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:21 PM
11

Women can do whatever they choose, but choosing with an ambitious mindset is much more fulfilling Choose what we want you to choose, not what you want to.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:54 PM
2

https://archive.ph/r0CHu for European readers.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:49 PM
6

I love how these predators go onto the sex offenders register for five years, while a man in a similar position would be on it for life. She's mentally capable of arranging and conducting a clandestine sexual relationship with a vulnerable boy, but is too anxious to stand trial? Who's her lawyer, they could get Assagne off.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 12:40 AM
-18

We're talking about it. Ed: fuck me there's a bunch of thick gits in here. The DM is banned from a load of left wing subs as being too right wing, or facsist. It's without doubt a right-leaning paper. It's as close as you can get to an anti-feminist paper that isn't a tabloid. And there's a whole bunch of idiots who have no idea just throwing the votes that way, because they are following the herd.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:43 PM
-33

You're on reddit, you obviously are a neet, obese, live in your moms basement and contribute virtually nothing to the world. Ain't generalisations grand.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:38 PM
-26

It's the Daily Mail. The one thing they definitely aren't is feminist.
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:26 PM
7

Get in there and take your downvotes. Make your point about the most obvious of their comments, keep it straightforward, truthful and respectful, put forward your point of view and take the virulence you get back as a badge of honour. This years IMD has been very much improved from last years. Last year it was almost totally negative outside this sub, this year there's been several very positive discussions and reponses to it. Things are improving, slow and steady, so long as we keep the pressur…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/22 02:23 PM
3

I can't think of a clearer form of hate speech. And she's an idiot. All women already have access to guns, men having access makes no difference to that.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:14 PM
2

There's a hundred excuses, and quite a few justifications, for going along with it. Imo women are in a trap of their own making, they needed to feel independantly strong, so created this massive pressure group to change things. Which is fine, but now they are caught on it's back with virtually no way to get off. I'm not particularly concerned with women's rights, as far as I can tell they have all the rights they can use. But there's one exception to that. They deserve the right to believe whate…
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:05 PM
1

Not a woman, I'll go after men-hating whenever I see it.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:06 AM
6

Thing is, women are more socially-orientated than men. Which is fine when there's a problem, you have an instant group of people willing to help you out with it. But if you're the problem saying something the rest of them dislike, then you find yourself cast out on your own with no safety net. This is why a lot of women find it really difficult to go against the grain without support from other women.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 01:55 PM
6

Troy :) Careful there, or next it'll be "the majority of demi-gods are male"
/r/MensRights20/11/22 10:29 PM
19

God I loathe "apologies" like this. 'I'm sorry you got your feelings hurt by what I did' is not an apology. How about 'I apologise for offending/harming/making a mistake' and leave it at that instead of trying to get cute. edit: now I see why from the rest of your posts, edgy kid trying to get one over on the big bad MRAs. Grow up.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 11:28 AM
14

A lovely poem encouraging us all to strive the hardest, but it sets hellish high standards.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 02:41 PM
11

Strange how that only ever seems to apply one way.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 05:37 AM
15

They just want to shame control us. Shame is part of that process, but the overall aim is control, for us to blindly do whatever we're told, because they know best. The comment from OP exemplifies this, you are told you are evil, women-hating rapists [misogyny etc]. You are also told that you are never to question what they say, so you have to accept that you are evil, women-hating rapists. [believe all women] It's the combination that's meant to leave you with nowhere to turn, just to accept yo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/11/22 05:28 AM
3

No one should be de-platformed. If someone is peddling hate then we need to be able to see it to be able to argue against it. De-platforming is a weapon, one used mostly by one political side against another. And tbh, I'm getting sick and tired of American politics affecting the rest of the world like this.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 12:39 PM
12

I was thinking that, but it really comes down to money in the end. People low on the totem pole get credit by being zealous to the cause, once they get to the point where they're in charge of an organisation that's when the hands go out. Like the BLM head who bought a mansion with donations. Ideology takes a solid back seat to payoffs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 10:28 PM
27

Anyone can turn a blind eye if there's enough money involved.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 09:12 PM
4

Played with a girl for 2 years who used to tank for us, she was solid at it. Stereotyping yourself into one role because you think that is the "feminine" role is possibly the worst way to play a game. Especially if you're just learning the game, it's a vital role while DPS would be less essential.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 03:10 PM
5

Sounds a lot like someone talking about the urban myths. The only issue I have with women in gaming is that they often want to play the healer [which is what I'm doing!!]
/r/MensRights17/11/22 02:47 PM
21

Well that's a huge list of organisations and individuals willing to support a domestic abuser.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/11/22 01:20 PM
1

Not as satisfying though. If you must, they could have a seperate area in the coutroom that has a drop-down noose available? Or take a page out of the Bond movies, and wire the chair up for lights and sound.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 10:43 AM
1

Judge: Mr Foreman, what is your verdict? Foreman: Guilty your Honour, with a sentence of death. Judge: Very well, carry out the sentence Foreman: ChaClick --Boom
/r/PussyPassDenied17/11/22 10:28 AM
2

I'd say she's blown the chance of being a teacher, if OF makes her condition liveable let her stay on that. A teacher needs to be able to demonstrate the benefit of thinking through a decision, she's done the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:22 PM
7

Making it in school classrooms and advertising on school-related websites is a definite no. That's asking for students to be part of her cliientele. Also, these teachers are educating the kids in more than science, in behaviour as well. If you want to see 14 year olds making only fans then this is how to encourage it.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 11:15 PM
2

One of the reasons subs get banned is because people brigade from there. While I generally agree with the point you were making, it's best not to do the back and forth, it just puts this sub in harms way.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 10:14 PM
12

Or to prevent him getting any custody.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 06:08 PM
1

For the second time, it was described as getting into a struggle, which could mean just a shove. Being faceplanted for that would be a massive over-reaction which would not appear out of the ordinary for a crew that left a paralysed guy on a mattress to die. That this is also something that shouldn't have happened would be another of the "delusions" I appear to have. You should not under-estimate women's level of aggression, they are more than capable of taking up fighting for a living. As a gro…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 04:22 PM
1

It's also higher because men are assumed to be more aggressive, and violence from women gets overlooked or handwaved away with excuses left and right that are equally valid for men, yet never get considered. Whatever, that's actually irrelevant. There was no indication that he punched any guards, the only comment being " correctional officers got into a struggle with Ridley" which could mean just about anything. That's on the reporter, not the guards ofc. What IS on the guards is "tackling him t…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 11:35 AM
1

I've not seen statistics about it, but I'd be absolutely willing to bet that violence against men in prison is way higher than violence against women in prison, in exactly the same way women get charged less and convicted less. Remember, most people in prison aren't violent offenders, it's things like drug offences, or money-related, like not being able to pay the child support this month. It could be any of us. I'm not calling for more violence against women in prison, I think a civilised count…
/r/MensRights15/11/22 02:00 AM
2

It's stream of conciousness stuff, but that works really well to get the impressions across, as I do recall similar impressions for when gamergate took off. As in, "why they hell is this an actual issue, it's obvious it's egregious?" The way the games journos kept on coming back with yet more BS to try to shape the narrative, and people were taking them at face value.. "They wouldn't lie, they are journalists!". Tbh at times it felt surreal, dreamlike, or more accurately nightmare fuel. I've see…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/11/22 01:15 AM
1

I'm not sure how any other outside event would have been responsible for gamergate, that seemed to be an organic reaction to a very specific wrong-doing related to the gaming industry. The similarity is the same concept, control of the media after the event, and the framing of the issue being feminist vs the rest in nature. It seemed uncanny how quickly the media latched on to the idea that this was only a hate mob going after women, which was debunked very nicely by the Not Your Shield people l…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 08:16 PM
7

All women criminals have reasons. Men are just naturally criminals. Says it all really. It's the implied loss of agency in their arguments that I find most distasteful: "Women can't possibly be criminals, it's all because they were brought up that way/had a partner who led them astray" etc. Either women are hopeless, needing guide dogs to point them towards the toilets, or women are completely capable of deciding for themselves how they want to be. You can't have it both ways. If I were a woman …
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:09 PM
9

Maybe you should listen to what some of them are saying. It's been on their lists of things to do for a few years now.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:05 PM
12

Feminists think that women's prisons should be closed, no women should go to jail no matter what. It would appear that men being in prison is at least a men's rights issue based on that. I think that men sentenced to prison should serve their time in the way that is intended, not to have to descend to some "might makes right" kind of thinking which will undoubtedly stay with them after release, putting society at greater risk than before. Or to think that society doesn't give a fuck about them, …
/r/MensRights14/11/22 09:42 AM
10

He was in prison for the crimes he had committed and been sentenced for. That sentence didn't include having his neck dislocated or dying on the floor. The appalling treatment of men while incarcerated is absolutely a men's rights issue. This could easily happen to someone accused of a crime and remanded, before the trial.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 09:33 AM
2

It shows how quickly and thoroughly a pressure group can move from a minor fringe group to central authority assuming it can get the propaganda to support it. At the same time, I do feel there's a certain amount of reality behind the claims that this became a convenient stalking horse when the Occupy groups were making an irritation of themselves. I've never even heard those two terms before, but I feel I can describe what happened pretty well. If we're too busy fighting each other we're not goi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/22 09:12 AM
26

So long as there is some balance in how it plays out, I'm not particularly bothered about which concept they promote. It's when it completely favours one and limits the other, that's the problem.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 01:38 PM
13

Sounds like some of those atheists who are desperate to prove that they are better than religious people.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 12:37 PM
9

Just the idea that "these are words you're allowed to insult people with" and "these are words you're not allowed to insult people with" speaks of privilege and discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:43 AM
43

Imo it's an issue with being a mod. After a while they take on the attitude that "I'm right and you're wrong" from the start of a conversation. With some subjects they are unwilling to deviate from that, the idea that women are oppressed and need much more support nowadays seems to be one of them. This conversation never had a chance of going any other way.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:35 AM
5

Yeah, first I heard of them was the Houses of Parliament climb, and it was 20 seconds at the end of a news broadcast. I certainly agree with the effects on people seeing behind the curtain, I can't think of any news services I actually trust nowadays. It used to be the BBC but the fakery they came out with during the immigration crisis put paid to that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 08:18 PM
14

It was the Quinnspiracy to start off, and yes, the Gamers are Dead farce was huge, closely followed by the Not Your Shield tweets. All the way through the journos involved got hammered by the facts of the saga but there was never any consequences for them, as they had all the public news sources tied up. You'd hope that the truth would eventually come out to change the publicised perception. I have this fantasy that one day removing one brick from the facade of lies we have will cause the whole …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 08:00 PM
13

Two of the largest games are DnD and Magic the card game. Both are completely inundated. Star Wars, Star Trek, Lord of the Rings, DC and Marvel comics, I'd be happy to hear of any Western game/film cultures that haven't been corrupted. Japanese anime is apparently still holding out, it's not really my thing though and rumour is that it's starting to crack.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 07:43 PM
7

I'm fully aware that this sub is the main landing point for people who have hardly considered the need for men's rights in the past, who are quite often in distress due to rapidly deteriorating life circumstances and who need to talk it out before things spiral even worse for them. This is an important role for the sub and I would never criticise that. My concern is the continual re-invention of the wheel, when such things are readily apparent given a minutes consideration. Men's rights do not c…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 05:29 PM
3

Thanks for that, interesting reading. I can see elements of it that hit people in here including myself. Something to be on guard against I suppose.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 05:16 PM
56

I'd be wary of assuming that this capture of geek spaces has been a failure. This has been ongoing for at least a decade and very openly since gamergate took off. You'll note the official line on gamergate is still that it was a harrassment campaign and not a reasonable response to journalists geting into bed [literally] with game designers. Doctor Who is slated to go forward with RTD at the helm, who has come out with a rather bizarre discussion on clothes changes at the last regeneration, and …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/11/22 05:10 PM
13

I can see her point, those comments generalise way too much, but yeah, it's not like it's killallmen or anything.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 03:39 PM
11

Yeah, trolling is what we expect, trolling is what we get. Personally, no, you aren't welcome here. At least the sub rules don't ban you automatically, as you would be in the feminist subs.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 02:21 PM
38

Then what are you doing here? On an alt especially created for the sub? Don't bother, we know why you're here.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:04 PM
39

And I'm certain I could go to askfeminists or 2xc right this moment and pull out an equal number of misandrist posts, no need to search the archives there. Or we could take the opinion of a feminist alt who's undoubtedly posting in bad faith, and think that's important? No thanks. if people who actually use this sub feels there's a problem I'm sure they'll mention it. That would include the women who post here.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:33 PM
1

Because she is no longer the only victim in this situation, she's the aqggressor who has just publicly admitted to screwing up, and her lawyer has just admitted that harm was caused. So it doesn't matter how "clued in" you think you are, that's a slam dunk in court. And it doesn't matter that she is "passing on her trauma", that's just doublespeak for harming someone else, like abusers do.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:51 AM
0

Maybe you should read that quote.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:40 AM
127

Does anyone else get absolutely sick and tired of going over old ground time and time again? It feels like we can't get anywhere because we're always having to go back over basics, no, men's rights do not hate women, yes, we're not keen on feminists, but not all women are feminists and not all feminists are women. It's like we should have a popup on entry to the sub saying that entrance is allowed on understanding certain things, this being one of them. We waste so much energy repeating the same…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:39 AM
1

"Your right to throw a punch ends at my nose". I can certainly understand her being traumatised, that doesn't make false or incorrect accusations tolerable. If it had been settled then the question would still be open, as it is this is a complete 180, and with her own lawyer being daft enough to say that the accusation had cause suffering: “I know that Alan Dershowitz has suffered greatly from the allegation of sexual abuse made against him – an allegation that he has consistently, and vehementl…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 11:17 AM
1

If she's emotionally invested in it then it becomes even more important to her to make sure she's got the right person in the frame for it. Otherwise, as we see here, it taints any other accusations she's likely to make.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 10:52 AM
1

12 years then, do we have a higher or lower vote? I think it might be quicker than average, as this was a particularly appalling crime so there won't be as many appeals for clemency.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/22 06:05 PM
5

When the person she accused of rape has proof that they weren't there when she said he was, and is a lawyer who's going to sue her into the ground.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 05:58 PM
3

It's the end of 2022. Whats the over/under of how long it takes for this to be carried out?
/r/PussyPassDenied11/11/22 05:38 PM
10

Think that was a mod locking posts.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 02:53 PM
2

It's more normalised over there so that's not surprising.
/r/MensRights11/11/22 01:14 AM
3

Except that's not at all what was concluded. The abstract When education is in-person, attractive students receive higher grades in non-quantitative subjects, in which teachers tend to interact more with students compared to quantitative courses. This finding holds both for males and females. When instruction moved online during the COVID-19 pandemic, the grades of attractive female students deteriorated in non-quantitative subjects. However, the beauty premium persisted for males, suggesting th…
/r/MensRights10/11/22 11:20 PM
2

I know that I had to have a procedure quite some time ago, and I was offered the option of a circumcision. They gave me time to decide for myself, no pressure either way, and accepted my choice at the end of it. Can't really ask for more than that.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 02:33 PM
1

At the same time they have to seriously clamp down on back street circumcisions, these are the really dangerous practises that can kill boys easily.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:27 PM
0

That might be for cosmetic reasons as well. A dorsal slit is unusual and might cause issues in his sex life while a circumcision would appear relatively normal. Sure I agree with the "least damage done" principle, in this case they might be looking at psychological damage also.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 01:23 PM
11

It's the idea that somehow you can retaliate for something that might have happened a millenia ago by screwing over men nowadays. So to right an imaginary wrong, you're going to do a real wrong to people alive today. It's not "reversing" anything, it's straight up sexism.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 12:35 PM
56

The survey, published by Resume Builder and Pollfish on Wednesday, found that 52% of hiring managers believe their company practices “reverse discrimination” There's no such thing as "reverse discrimination" it's just discrimination, in this case racism sexism. edit: duh.
/r/MensRights10/11/22 08:37 AM
3

That doesn't really matter at all. They come after you for being on an MRA sub, with the intent to shame and silence you. Own it, and give a couple of reasons why you're on here, and it turns into a strength.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:57 PM
5

Never put anything that can identify you in real life into profiles or posts. Stick with that and you are as safe online as anywhere.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:52 PM
78

The study finds that attractive women get a boost due to discrimination in their favour, while attractive men get a boost due to enhanced persistence based on self-confidence from thieir appearance. Not at all a message that feminists will want to have spread around.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:48 PM
-1

"Beauty is in the eye of the beholder". Did I miss it or did they ignore the sex of the person apparently being influenced by attractivemess? Seems to ba a pretty big miss in the survey.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 10:42 PM
-3

Bloody hell, please stop taking what I said out of all proportion. There's much more recent articles to get annoyed at, imo one's that are easily more biased than this one. Yes, you can feel free to get annoyed at this, I'm not saying you shouldn't, but wasting time on a repost seems a bit futile to me. Otherwise we'll see a flood of articles "suffragettes bomb post office" as breaking news.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 09:11 AM
-11

Ofc you can be. Just don't think this is something new.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:45 AM
0

Eh?
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:44 AM
-13

Oh I really doubt that. Just that there's no point getting pissed off about something that may have been the case four years ago.
/r/MensRights07/11/22 08:08 AM
-18

Article is 4 years old
/r/MensRights07/11/22 07:25 AM
6

Knocked another one out of the park. At some point we're going to have to look at some of these global organisations like the UN, universities et al, their influence is becoming very toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/22 06:05 PM
6

There probably is in certain cases. This sub is what I like to think of as a primary sub, ie the first you'll encounter when something has gone very badly wrong in your life and you are looking for some help. So we get men coming in who have just been told they are getting divorced, have no access to their kids and they have to live in a car to be able to afford to eat. Or other situations equally horrendous. This is the first sub they see. You're going to get some ill-feeling under those circum…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 01:31 AM
10

All women hate men? Nope, some do, a large proportion of feminists seem to, but anyone who is interested in true equality is welcome. Your problem is the ridiculous things you say, r/MensLib are truly tolerant. They fight for the male's rights issues without being hateful in the process for example. Regulars on here know exactly the type of environment that pervades menslib, and they certainly aren't fighting for men's rights, and they definitely aren't tolerant. That's why you get downvotes, an…
/r/MensRights06/11/22 01:12 AM
30

hate boner for women and feminism. Don't conflate the two. There are quite a few women who legitimately post on here, not just random drive-by hate posts like yours. Feminists get what they deserve, women are more than welcome.
/r/MensRights05/11/22 06:30 PM
4

The term eco-feminism was coined to capture the sense that because of their biological connection to earth and lunar cycles, women were natural advocates of environmentalism. Just to highlight the poor quality of that article. As it happens I agree with the statement above, but it's very simplistic, ignoring that the suffragettes were a bunch of terrorists and that the women of the movement went on to be incredibly manipulative, taking part in the white feather campaign of WW1. That type of mani…
/r/MensRights05/11/22 04:33 AM
2

I'm not all that bothered, just not all that interested either. The problem isn't the action in those movies, it's just a fantasy movie after all, it's the disparging way they treat men the rest of it.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 01:39 AM
4

"Men should always pay for the first date, because they won't want to come back for a second."
/r/MensRights03/11/22 12:49 PM
1

Go buy a car battery, or cleaning materials. There's almost certainly other sources as well, plumbing supplies possibly.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 05:03 PM
1

I doubt that is actually correct, I suspect a lot of feminists can quite easily see the discrimination and hate being aimed at men in the media and elsewhere and think that it's fair because of how women were treated five thousand years ago. Ignoring that no one alive nowadays was at all responsible for what happened in the past, and their attitude is entirely "the sins of the father", an inherently unjust position to take.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter