TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Dexter77 Archive

View 60 posts and 258 comments by Dexter77 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1673

Dexter77/r/MensRights21/01/14 02:14 PM
441

Dexter77/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:06 PM
376

Dexter77/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:19 PM
339

Dexter77/r/MensRights30/03/13 03:19 PM
327

Dexter77/r/MensRights25/03/13 02:47 PM
317

Dexter77/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:41 PM
315

Dexter77/r/seduction13/05/13 12:27 PM
151

Dexter77/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:41 PM
140

Dexter77/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:39 PM
123

Dexter77/r/MensRights29/05/13 09:54 AM
82

Dexter77/r/MensRights25/11/13 03:00 PM
77

NewsDexter77/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:00 AM
72

Dexter77/r/MensRights03/11/13 08:21 PM
72

Dexter77/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:34 AM
67

Dexter77/r/MensRights12/11/11 03:55 PM
66

Dexter77/r/MensRights01/06/13 10:05 AM
65

Dexter77/r/MensRights03/12/11 05:55 PM
61

Rant/VentingDexter77/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 08:12 AM
59

Dexter77/r/seduction20/11/10 05:28 PM
57

Dexter77/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:10 AM
51

Dexter77/r/seduction15/06/11 05:29 PM
44

Dexter77/r/MensRights23/11/13 01:16 PM
36

Dexter77/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:45 PM
30

Dexter77/r/seduction16/04/11 02:20 PM
28

Dexter77/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:11 AM
24

Dexter77/r/seduction09/06/12 09:12 AM
22

Dexter77/r/seduction26/07/11 01:12 PM
21

Dexter77/r/seduction15/07/12 04:48 PM
20

Dexter77/r/MensRights19/08/13 11:41 AM
19

Dexter77/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:05 PM
17

Dexter77/r/MensRights15/07/12 07:37 AM
15

Dexter77/r/MensRights01/07/12 06:21 PM
14

Dexter77/r/MensRights30/07/11 08:42 PM
13

Dexter77/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:30 PM
12

Dexter77/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:31 PM
11

Dexter77/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:32 PM
8

Dexter77/r/MensRights17/06/12 07:40 AM
6

Dexter77/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:42 AM
6

Dexter77/r/seduction10/07/11 02:01 PM
6

Dexter77/r/seduction30/10/10 01:56 PM
6

Dexter77/r/seduction05/08/13 12:38 PM
5

Dexter77/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:16 PM
4

Dexter77/r/seduction02/02/11 10:38 AM
3

Ask Red PillDexter77/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 11:54 AM
3

Dexter77/r/MensRights29/05/13 02:03 AM
3

Men's RightsDexter77/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 02:33 PM
3

Dexter77/r/seduction22/01/11 02:21 PM
2

Dexter77/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:18 PM
2

Dexter77/r/seduction01/06/11 02:06 PM
1

Dexter77/r/seduction18/09/11 08:32 AM
1

Dexter77/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 07:28 AM
1

Dexter77/r/seduction02/12/11 05:53 PM
1

Dexter77/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:17 AM
1

Dexter77/r/seduction05/02/11 05:30 AM
1

Dexter77/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:38 PM
0

Dexter77/r/seduction09/01/13 12:52 PM
0

Dexter77/r/seduction19/06/11 07:35 AM
0

Dexter77/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:10 PM
0

Dexter77/r/seduction03/03/13 03:59 PM
0

Dexter77/r/seduction26/05/12 02:50 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

No, you should not, but if you did, the reaction should not be gender based.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 10:55 AM
3

More
/r/MensRights16/07/14 07:00 AM
1

Start with what is attraction
/r/seduction14/07/14 08:37 AM
2

I remember reading about this in the early 90's (some BBS). I agreed with it but thought I was fixed to the friend ladder. It took over a decade before I stumbled on the PuA community and finally understood what it all meant.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 09:17 AM
1

Are kidding? Just google keywords: women, overweight and career. Those articles and studies are feminist origin.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 07:20 PM
1

Thanks :-)
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:00 AM
7

For some very sad reason, blue bill women think men validate them on the same principles as they validate men. E.g. that master's degree increases her value while in reality it does the exact opposite.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 11:41 AM
3

Yes, the 10% can choose freely. But does that 90% have any options besides obeying the rules set by women?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 07:27 PM
56

You've noticed an anecdote of a whole 'paradigm shift'. That's the result of women being 'empowered'. Before they had the power to choose the man they want, but due to being 'punished' for sluttiness didn't ride the cock carousel. Now they have gained all the advantages men used to have but in addition kept the ones women already had. The new paradigm is just forming but following changes will be seen: Top 10% of men become the only acceptable form of male appearance Bottom percentage of men bec…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 10:33 AM
5

I wouldn't blame Obama. It's the same here in Europe. Equality isn't reached until every university is women only.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:49 AM
6

Exactly. I would actually generalize this further. In almost every case woman's biggest threath is another woman and they do their best to kill off the competition. If Feminists stopped blaming patriarchy, MRA or anything male related and started to look how to solve their internal problems (i.e. how to get women to get along) they could actually succeed in something other than spreading misandry.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 08:46 AM
1

I foresee a generation of bitter old women
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 01:15 PM
3

Men can't be sexually abused, men enjoy sex, thus this is a male privilege </feminist logic>
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:15 PM
2

Like others already pointed out, the deviation is higher in men. Men are not smarter, but the nature tries to guarantee that at least one of the parents is near average intelligence. That said, it also explains why men dominate both ends of the scale -- Execs, scientists, athletes as well as homeless, jobless, etc. Feminism is fixing the high end by forcing less intelligent women to those positions but doesn't care about the low end.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 06:55 AM
61

Unwanted conversation* *) Creepy guys only
/r/MensRights17/05/14 12:26 PM
7

industrial deaths how many of those are male dominated industries? It's so ironic how the equal pay demand contradicts this logic
/r/MensRights02/05/14 10:02 AM
18

Sounds a lot like the Finnish party called True Finns. They are also anti-euro and uphold the traditional family model (against all Feminist principles). They were also ridiculed and called nazis up until over 20% voted for then.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 09:33 AM
-6

Isn't this more of a blue pill problem? Because you can't fuck around and realize your fantasies, you need to withold orgasm for days to be able to get aroused by the same old pussy you've seen hundreds of times.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 09:54 AM
94

Some Asian women at 5 ‘ 4” are under 100 pounds and healthy. In fact, the current average Chinese woman is 5’ 4” and 125 pounds And they are abundant. Good luck with your fat-is-beautiful attitude local girls.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:51 PM
2

This is why I love this subreddit. While other male-dominated female interaction related subreddits like Theredbill and Mensrights focus on complaining how difficult women are, Seddit takes the control and gives no fucks about it. Reading TRP or MR make you only feel worse and never gets you laid, while Seddit makes you the king of your life with a harem of best of breed women.
/r/seduction11/03/14 01:55 PM
1

Retry
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:31 AM
11

I love here in Scandinavia how we have men who are able to do that and they're married to feminists who in public claim that's exactly how they want their husbands to be. You see in TV programs of their equal marriage where every emotion is shared and how wonderful their life is. Yet, when you have a beer or two with those ladies they're all over you. They long desperately for a real man who takes the charge. And they don't even mind fucking around because 'their husbands would understand'. That…
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 02:42 PM
1

In my case they were customer's (public sector) project managers. You can choose your employer but not the customers :-(
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 03:06 PM
7

Nothing in b is true.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 06:25 PM
15

Even female execs are not able to take responsibility for their fate. So so much easier to blame the men. No wonder female execs are rare and would be even more rare without quotas.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 06:05 PM
6

While it's true that women use psychological abuse more often than men, did you even read the article: Women's Aid, the Sara Charlton Charitable Foundation and stalking advice service Paladin have urged the government to criminalise "coercive control", patterns of abusive behaviour and causing psychological harm, in order to make it easier to prove long-running abuse. "Currently two women a week die at the hands of a partner or ex-partner; the next step to preventing these deaths is reform to al…
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 11:52 AM
14

The father also screwed up big time by telling the daughter details of the case even after signing a non-disclosure agreement. I don't think this is TRP material. Just stupid people doing stupid things.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 11:45 AM
12

They're only comparing monthly salaries. Men e.g. typically put in more hours and have less sick leaves. I.e. women probably in fact earn more than men in tech jobs.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 06:12 PM
42

This 'locker room talk' has been going on since humans learned to speak. Making it criminal is a psychological castration. No wonder women are missing 'the real men'.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 05:59 PM
52

After reading the post about women being like children, these stories are becoming more and more logical.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 05:44 PM
5

They also use it as a weapon. I have been twice in a situation where a female project manager has screwed up big time and when held accountable for the actions, instead of explaining them they have started to cry. At that point all the white knights have jumped to defend her and every mistake have been forgotten.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/14 03:51 PM
7

Considering that higher educated women tend to divorce lower educated husbands, and even more likely if they're the breadwinners, I simply can't see any advantage in having a wife with a phd
/r/TheRedPill27/02/14 03:44 PM
1

I'd really suggest /r/seduction, they are the experts on this subject
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 03:49 PM
1

I think /r/seduction might have more expertise on the topic
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 03:37 PM
2

Maybe I'm stupid but your 'info'graphic really doesn't open up to me
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 03:36 PM
4

Had to check that I wasn't reading /r/seduction. Funny how these subreddits are alike while they could be almost the exact opposites.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 01:13 PM
3

Plenty of girls are sluts like that and there is nothing wrong about it as long as they don't lie about it
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 01:08 PM
4

Good for the guy who was blowed (the video), otherwise she could still play that rape card
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 01:06 PM
10

I fully agree. Sadly, those don't exist.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 05:06 PM
1

Women are becoming the breadwinners. I don't mind getting them a diamond ring if I get a motorcycle in return.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:57 AM
1

It's true. If she finds you attractive, you can say pretty much anything (with a smile) and she will laugh. That's the funny the women mean when they say they like funny guys.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:52 AM
41

If only she had been one of those "I need feminism because" girls, it would've been quite an awakening to the real sisterhood.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:49 AM
15

Sadly, I don't think getting a beta boyfriend early is a good thing. He'll just have to suffer more years of cheating.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 10:40 AM
3

I think it hurts most the white knights. Realizing their whole mission is in vain.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 10:34 AM
21

That's pretty funny until you realize the gender neutrality also applies to police, firemen, etc.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/14 10:24 AM
5

You're correct but HR usually does filter the applicants. The hiring manager often sees only few of the hundreds of the applicants or even their CVs. Hence, HR has a huge effect on who gets hired.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 11:17 AM
1

I have steered? And I thought it was you who brought up that aspect. I hope you realize it's the symbolic message that matters, not what celestiality the characters represent. Where do you think the girls get idea that it's ok to hit men if not movies and tv?
/r/MensRights01/02/14 06:49 PM
-3

Sure, I'm with you as soon as we see a male character punching a female demi-god for fun.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 05:28 PM
8

Caused by him dying. I.e his fault.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:35 PM
2

So called equality at its finest. Man has to spend a fortune to achieve the default level of rights women have.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 05:15 PM
15

And it's a bit ironic since almost all of the name calling in the feminist version is done by women themselves.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 12:38 PM
5

Your first question is so generic that I'd suggest googling. The equivalent to cock carousel is "being a nice guy". Both are repellents to the other gender.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:46 PM
15

That's pretty convenient. For women. Even better than the Nordic equality. Ride the cock carousel your youth and in your thirties just pick a man from the ones you've fucked and if he refuses to marry you, cry rape until he does. If the marriage doesn't work out, you'll get half of his wealth anyway.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:23 AM
-3

While your story certainly is unfortunate, I don't think it relates to this post.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 07:51 AM
1

I guess they haven't read the bible.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 04:32 PM
2

Having been in the community for a decade, I have to say this is one of the best advices I've ever heard. And something I had not read before. Thank you, sir!
/r/seduction09/12/13 08:34 PM
12

Removal of Slut shaming In my experience, it's always women who even use slut shaming. In those rare occasions I've heard men use those words, the shaming has been initiated by women. Immigration laws tightened This is interesting topic. For some strange reason a foreign bride is always a product of human trafficking but when a middle-aged woman brings a third world toyboy home, it's somehow magnificent empowerment of the womanhood.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/13 08:15 AM
3

That must be so difficult for the Feminists to swallow because it indicates that there is a biological difference between genders after all (dah?).
/r/MensRights25/11/13 08:40 PM
4

Sounds perfect, now I know which movies to talk about to annoy Feminists.
/r/TheRedPill22/11/13 04:18 PM
15

The only news here is that in Sweden men are not embarrassed to tell they're victims of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 07:38 AM
22

In large enterprises HR typically filters the applicants because managers don't have time to read hundreds or thousands of applications or interview dozens. I.e. managers only meet the filtered choises.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 05:45 PM
15

Forgot the most important one: She is easy
/r/TheRedPill27/10/13 06:13 AM
4

To be exact, it becomes a rape/sexual assault within the upcoming days, months or years IF she decides she didn't like it or the poor guy dumps her.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 12:59 PM
23

Indeed, in larger perspective
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:06 AM
1

Duh
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 02:51 PM
3

You're right that playing with your hair is not an IOI. There was even a study confirming that girls do it to guys they don't like. You lean in only when you feel comfortable to lean in. Making you comfortable is the key. Yep. Or on her period. No offense.
/r/seduction04/10/13 07:37 AM
8

I remember this happening when I was five. I wish I would've know this then.
/r/seduction04/10/13 07:31 AM
10

Ah yes, that must be the reason why so many young guys refuse to settle down -- they want to support the gender equality by not taking an advantage of the marriage.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:21 PM
15

No, because the article describes a narcissistic extrovert.
/r/seduction03/08/13 06:50 PM
22

I'm a white male living in the Nordics. My ancestors have never participated slave trade nor has there ever been slaves in my country. The only connection to the slave owners I have is my skin color. Though I highly suspect the slave traders were much darker than me. Why the hell am I somehow responsible for the actions of slave traders who have no connection to my people?
/r/MensRights29/07/13 12:51 PM
1

Ok, my bad
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:48 PM
1

In my experience, to catch a cougar (in a night club), all you need is to smile to her. They do all the work for you.
/r/seduction16/07/13 04:28 PM
2

Thanks! Didn't notice, I'll delete
/r/MensRights18/06/13 08:42 AM
3

"Well I, for one, look forward to a female character in The Hobbit, and good on Peter Jackson for realising that something written in 1937 is perhaps a little outdated in it's gender balance." For the * sake, let's also have some some elf-hobbit gay families with adopted orcs raised gender neutrally, and why not metrosexuals, drag queens and transvestites, I'm sure today's Tolkien would've had them in the book. Heck, why do we even need the original books, let's just make a Middle-Earth based SC…
/r/MensRights15/06/13 06:25 PM
1

In this case, does it matter if the result is the same?
/r/MensRights01/06/13 03:11 PM
44

Summary of reasons: Women don't apply to management positions. Women don't believe in themselves. Women don't demand higher salary or better titles. They are satisfied with a job they like to do. When women don't believe they're are fit to be leaders which leads other people to believe so also. Women think putting in lots of hours is the best way to prove their leadership skills -- which is simply incorrect. Women often decline a promotion they're offered.
/r/MensRights29/05/13 10:06 AM
8

You post a nude pic of yourself on a public site and then complain when it becomes public? OMG, misogyny!!!
/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:27 PM
3

It's not a rape obsession, it's the redefined rape by Feminists. They want an absolute control over men's sexual needs by making all of them illegal (calling them rape, abuse or something similar).
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:40 PM
9

"many others pointed out how the men were responsible" Wow! Matriarchy has reached the point of reverse Sharia. Where as in the Sharia upholding countries woman is being blamed for being raped (seducing man etc), we now have criminal women entrapping men and the men are being blamed!
/r/MensRights23/05/13 04:20 PM
11

All the greatest love writers/novelists (e.g. Shakespear) are men. How could they write about something so well if they don't know the feeling.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 09:41 AM
8

Because men are so violent by nature
/r/MensRights17/05/13 08:22 PM
35

Not really. You'd still bang her.
/r/seduction13/05/13 05:35 PM
-1

You can empirically prove the hypothesis yourself without a large scale study
/r/seduction13/05/13 05:33 PM
7

Are you implying the alone forevers know this but choose not to use it?
/r/seduction13/05/13 05:30 PM
2

Who funds these studies? Nice guys (who haven't found Seddit)?-)
/r/seduction13/05/13 03:37 PM
2

Maybe credit the original submitter to /r/worldnews?
/r/MensRights06/05/13 04:51 PM
0

Sorry, mistyped the name, here's one example
/r/MensRights19/04/13 12:34 PM
6

The writer, Malin Holm, is one of the leading Feminists in Sweden and sits in the national board of gender studies. But factually you're correct, it is not the public opinion of MRA in Sweden, it's a view of one of the leading Feminist, accepted by the Feminist movement and not objected by the public.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 08:52 AM
19

"Feminism has fought no wars.. killed no opponents.." Yet, if the men hadn't done that on the behalf of women, we would have no Feminism.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:14 AM
2

A bit out of topic but in the article, any idea what drug makes your eyes look like this?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:52 AM
6

Reminds me of how someone said when I posted this that it could never happen in the States. Seems that it's already happening, just less publicly.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 05:13 PM
7

That bitch is so crazy it scares me. I mean, all she would've needed is some alone time with Michael, and she would've succeeded in destroying him.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:36 AM
4

Yes, you have a valid point, I shouldn't have used word 'never'. There are Feminists who debate, sadly, they are not the ones we mainly encounter (as you can see reading the comments in this thread). It's the SRS type. Maybe they're the loudest or most active or something else, but in any case, they give the public image to the Feminist movement.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 06:19 PM
4

Congrats on finding that one thread. I'd rather refer to the MRM opinion leaders (who keep blogs). Never ever are Feminists agreeing to open debates with them, or inviting them to gender equality forums, or what ever. Heck, did you look at the link in the post? Mainstream Feminists trying to make anti-Feminism illegal, banning MRM, is that the reasonable manner you talk about?
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:30 PM
4

You mean for example like the link about government supported mainstream Feminists trying to make critique against Feminism a criminal offense. Oh wait, which one was that, radical or not.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 05:19 PM
6

Can you be more specific, I tried search but couldn't find any of these comments you referred to.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 04:15 PM
4

While that might be true, their views are 100% aligned with the other loud, aggressive Feminists. Oddly, 'the main stream Feminists' never condemn these views.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 03:39 PM
4

Kudos for linking back to the r/MensRights discussion.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:00 PM
5

Out of curiosity, do you think retarded or handicapped men should live in celibacy? For most of them, the only way to get sex is through prostitution.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 09:22 AM
6

The number one reason for misogyny is hypergamy. The more women exercise it the more angry AFCs there will be. It's much like racism and makes you feel like a victim of racism.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:40 PM
10

Having worked for twenty years in the tech industry, I'd say sexist jokes about women exist because lots of tech guys are treated like shit by women. But it seems that joking about women is far worse than being abused by them.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:26 PM
2

Mentally castrated during the past century
/r/MensRights26/03/13 07:28 AM
6

Masculinist standards means pretty much the patriarchy. I.e. the Masculinist world view has to come down.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:58 PM
9

You seem to be quite confident about the American Feminists..
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:33 PM
11

The report was ordered and paid by the Nordic ministry council, not just Norwegians.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 07:32 PM
15

Please note that the report was ordered and paid by the Nordic ministry council. It was not just 'some proposal'.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:51 PM
22

That's pretty much bullshit. It is NOT female only problem. Lots of bloggers get hate mail, even death threats, regardless of their gender. See for example the Finland's leading men's rights activist (Laasanen) blog comments. He gets hateful replies every day. No one cares because he is a man. This is yet another example of women presenting themselves as (the only) victims.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 06:27 PM
83

For those who are not familiar with the Nordic politics -- this proposal might actually pass. The Nordic countries have an extremely strong Feminist movement that controls also all the main media outlets. And a word of warning -- the same will come to your country. Maybe not tomorrow but in time. Prepare yourselves. We Nordic men got caught unprepared. There was no MRA here until it was already too late. We Nordic men have become underdogs and it's getting worse by the day.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:34 PM
50

Their expert panel's proposal: Anti-feminist harassment and hate speech should be punishable. Low threshold for reporting threats and harassment must be created. Annual national surveys of anti-feminism must be implemented. Research on anti feminism must be prioritized. Increasing equality and anti-discrimination requires the change to Masculinist standards Measures to aid marginalized men and boys should be implemented. Anti-feminism should be part of the Equality officers' activity area. The p…
/r/MensRights25/03/13 03:22 PM
3

It's the same amount of deaths per 100.000 as breast cancer claims. Yet, no campaigns, movements, charities, etc.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 09:10 PM
27

Ah yes, the legendary white male privilege. Unlike gender and minority quotas, it's not visible. You never feel its power but you get blamed using it. No matter how hard you work, the reason you succeed is always the invisible white male privilege. I often wonder how much easier it would be if I wasn't a white male.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 03:53 PM
2

If my wife looked like that, I would also be playing Xbox much rather than her..
/r/MensRights16/03/13 04:54 PM
2

Cherry picking feminism at its finest. My guess is that they are just following the western forerunners without the burden of pleasing the older feminist generations. Like in the west, they are not feminists but egotists who use feminism as a facade.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:01 PM
3

Reminds me of a woman I used to work with. She was a real feminazi in every turn, except when it came to her own benefit. She started at the company as a financial controller but in a few short months got promoted to the chief financial officer position (at the age of 27). All thanks to sleeping with the CEO.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:26 AM
19

I'm curious can the glass ceiling ever be about equality. The higher you go the fewer individuals there are. Hence the competition becomes more individualized. For example board positions, that are under quota discussions in Europe, typically require entrepreneurial background and women almost never build successful corporations from a scratch. So how the heck can you say their lack of experience is caused by discrimination?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 04:17 PM
5

Wow, after reading the project articles, I must say, never before have I discovered such an elaborate source of bullshit. All the myths put together and articles protected by angry women.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 04:01 PM
3

Follows the typical Feministmainstream logic. All women's problems are collective while men's problems are personal.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 03:21 PM
6

Dont wanna sound cynical but in the poor countries the most powerful seduction trick is to speak English and look wealthy.
/r/seduction28/02/13 02:29 PM
5

What they're really saying is that it's men's own fault they don't look like that, and it's also men's fault that women don't look like that either
/r/MensRights28/02/13 09:32 AM
13

Reminds me of how women have always been the primary victims of war
/r/MensRights24/02/13 11:39 AM
7

See my example. The clause creates a negative association between men and rape. The reader thinks "oh, most men don't rape but that still leaves a large portion that does". It's word play, used often by reporters. "Most members of the group are not racist", "most immigrants are not criminals", etc.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 09:39 AM
7

while that might be true, saying "most men are not rapists" certainly is misandry. Or how would it sounds if some man said "most women are not whores". And no, MRAs don't look for badness everyone. Most of us are here because we never knew such existed until it hit our face.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 08:31 AM
1

The gender issue here is that I didn't even know men got attacked. Thanks to the fair and balanced media.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 07:01 AM
2

Not like this didn't happen everyday already. Tip of the ice berg.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:56 AM
7

"Even if one (rightly) assumes that men commit most sexual assaults, the truth is that most men are not rapists." It stopped reading there.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:47 AM
1

This isn't men's rights, it's a woman privilege.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 06:43 AM
1

A male privilege indeed.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:07 PM
16

She gets half of their assets and a normal pension anyway. Why should she get his future income?
/r/MensRights12/01/13 07:12 PM
1

Twice as many looks and flirts from women than normally.
/r/seduction09/01/13 05:27 PM
2

Based on what? Writer's opinion?
/r/seduction05/01/13 07:53 AM
9

We've had this for a while here in the Nordics. The downside is that women still aim for less challenging jobs. For example over 50% of graduating medical doctors are women but on average they do 20-40% less hours than the male countetparts which leads to insufficient services. And no, it's not because of they have children. They simply don't want to work as much. When the sufficient level of income is reached they take off the rest of the hours while the male doctors push for maximum income.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 01:32 PM
1

There's a difference between kino and an intimate touch. You can't do the latter before the girl feels safe with you.
/r/seduction09/12/12 09:53 AM
1

While your respond might've been witty, you cornered yourself with it. To make the woman look bad, you should've asked whether that is the equality women are seeking.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 08:49 AM
1

God's will?
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:12 PM
2

And 40% of the wealth of the world is owned by 1% of the population. That 1% has either inherited it or created it through an entrepreneurship. Is she trying to say we should have gender quotas in inheritance laws or that it's men's fault that women's enterprises don't do well enough?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 02:06 PM
6

It has a point. Paying an alimony is a pain in the ass when you actually know the child is not yours.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 07:02 AM
7

According to the leading Feminist theories, men are to blame for everything. Hence, if they weren't able to find abuse, they didn't look deep enough. If they can close out husband being abusive, in the end, it could've been the general abusive atmosphere caused by the patriarchy. </s>
/r/MensRights03/10/12 01:21 PM
2

My interpretation is that especially the young guys are in trouble. The chart doesn't distinct the difference between age groups but it's quite unlikely that the unemployment in older generations would've dramatically changed. I.e. the downward spiral is caused by young lads not getting work at all.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 05:40 PM
6

I sincerely hope the feminist movement doesn't get as far in the States as it has gotten here in the Nordics before the truth comes out. The recent studies here have shown women actually to be more violent in relationships than men. Additionally they don't feel guilty about it because they never been thought as a child that being violent is wrong -- only boys can be violent.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:47 PM
1

Ah, yes, yet another high priority feminist issue. It certainly reflects the state of the feminist movement.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:42 PM
2

It's actually pretty feminist message. Painting men emotional and then making fun of it. Considering the society still doesn't let (the real) men to have nor express their emotions.
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:20 PM
2

Good for you! Even though your reasoning is different, you admit the Feminist claim that it's patriarchy's fault is incorrect?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:31 AM
26

Sadly, what women always refuse to acknowledge but do admit in anonymous questionnaires, is that enhancing their sexual appearance give them dominance over other women. Even in female only groups the alpha women dress provocatively.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 05:02 PM
1

Thanks! And great job getting these AMAs! You have my utmost respect. (why the heck are you downvoted???)
/r/seduction10/08/12 06:00 AM
7

Just unbelievable how fast he escalates. From hatred to love within seconds. He expresses no interest in them, doesn't even look them in the eyes when talking but at the same time they feel like he is their soulmate. If I got this correctly -- display extreme confidence, talk to her as she was nothing special but talk a lot, show no interest in her but touch her all the time, escalate to hugs and kisses.
/r/seduction09/08/12 05:41 PM
1

If hacking and vandalizing the content of a public webpage is called cyber terrorism, is it less cyber terrorism if hacking is not involved?
/r/MensRights09/08/12 03:36 PM
3

If it was about equality, we would see quotas also in mining, metal, lumber, etc industries. For some reason feminists only worry about women not getting the highest paid jobs and corporate board positions.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:33 PM
2

"When a man was beaten or abused by his wife in 17th and 18th Century England, his community would call upon a traditional intervention. The victim would be ritually humiliated." Back then it was ok to hit back. Today, if you hit back you'll end up in prison, if you don't, you'll be publicly humiliated. I don't see much positive development here.
/r/MensRights08/08/12 12:27 PM
10

How the heck does your link support the argument you made? Your point simply isn't true. Where I live, the leading MRA activists/bloggers (e.g. Henry Laasanen) openly invite feminists to debate. But they never ever take on the offer. They don't want an open debate because the public would immediately see through the false logic. Like what happened in Norway.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:38 PM
9

Exactly. Additionally I found it very offending to bring up this subreddit in the context of violence against women and rapes. Which the article was about.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 07:55 AM
1

I've had the same nick since the eighties (BBSes, IRC, MUDs, etc). Just too lazy to invent a new one. Besides it seems to come back to fashion every decade.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:09 PM
2

Sadly, my username comes from here
/r/MensRights03/08/12 07:03 AM
3

For comparison a man who also killed his newborn baby. Though only one.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:40 AM
1

That seem to apply only to the jobs women don't want. There's plenty of keen ladies for the corporate board quotas that are currently dominated by men.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 05:16 PM
4

How do you mean? Where I live (The Nordics), women are encouraged to those roles. They have quotas at universities, newspapers write positive articles about women in technical jobs almost weekly, those careers are actively marketed to girls, most of the elementary school teachers are women who give girls betters grades at math and physics, etc.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 03:57 PM
6

Exactly. As soon as 50% of the top100 chess players are women, 50% of engineers, 50% mathematicians, etc I might begin to believe women par with men in logical IQ.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 01:24 PM
6

I'm 35 and these seem to apply to me too.
/r/seduction20/07/12 11:42 PM
1

Have you ever read the top selling erotic novels for women? How about erotic movies? That's exactly the rape culture. Women themselves buying books and movies that promote rape.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 10:26 AM
1

If it's a blog entry, how can it be unclear whether he said to kill police officers or not?
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:39 AM
0

Sorry for the typo in the topic, it's Berge.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 08:18 AM
1

You do know he was a professional writer already before the PUA career and worked for example for The New York Times?
/r/seduction16/07/12 08:18 AM
1

Because pure emotion and pure logic never mix well
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:11 AM
1

Why horrible? The Game wasn't the best or most informational PUA book I've read but it certainly was well written. Strauss is a good writer and his texts are easy to ready. Unlike many other PUAs who concentrate on techniques and details, Strauss brings a story which is pleasant to read.
/r/seduction16/07/12 07:08 AM
1

Of course it's also confidence but on the other hand, it's inevitable to have a good confidence when you have a nice body. And no, I don't go around shirtless but do wear slim clothes to enhance the v-shape.
/r/seduction14/07/12 07:24 AM
46

I've been in the scene for a while now. But it wasn't until a year ago I started to focus on my body. That's when I realized the importance of the physique. It triggers some primal instinct in women. After gaining male model muscles and dropping my body fat below 10%, I noticed an apparent change in women's attitudes toward me. I'm not a handsome man otherwise, just an average looking. It didn't seem to matter anymore, after they noticed my body, they just wanted to give it a ride. I'm already 3…
/r/seduction13/07/12 06:24 PM
13

The worst thing is that, that's exactly how the public feels about men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/07/12 04:30 PM
3

Yes, she is not affecting man's body but she is forcing him to a life long financial commitment (if she gets pregnant). Abortion is harsh, no question about it, but woman still has the choice when a man doesn't use a condom. But when a woman doesn't use birth control, man has no say in the consequences. He simply has to support the woman financially if she decides to have the child.
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:40 AM
3

When mothers kill their own children, courts typically reduce the sentence due to tiredness etc. For example where I live, Finland, there's a specific crime called 'child murder by the mother' which holds the maximum penalty of four years while for normal murder it's life. Regarding pedophilia, I don't even begin to.. just read this subreddit. Comparison of women's birth control and condoms you don't seem to get. Let me just ask a simple question, if a man decides not to use a condom and doesn't…
/r/MensRights02/07/12 11:21 AM
27

And they call whoring immoral if not illegal. This is far worse.
/r/MensRights01/07/12 05:34 PM
9

It might already be too late, at least in the Nordics where up to 80% of the teachers are women. School performance of boys has dramatically dropped during the past thirty decades correlating directly with the increment in the amount of female teachers. Instead of adjusting the teaching methods, the female teachers keep blaming the boys for being too wild and inattentive. Usage of feminists teaching methods is only increasing which has created a vicious cycle of boys starting to drop out. E.g. i…
/r/MensRights01/07/12 03:02 PM
1

Ah, yes, a good point! That also explains the missing 25%.
/r/MensRights17/06/12 02:20 PM
1

And even if it did, you could cure it just by raping a child
/r/MensRights09/06/12 06:59 PM
1

Exactly, especially when statistically it's more likely that a woman abuses or kills a child.
/r/MensRights06/06/12 12:17 PM
1

Couple of examples: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/t9361/til_men_should_avoid_doing_something_nice_when_it/ http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/24/mall-security-guard.html?utm_source=feedburner
/r/MensRights06/06/12 07:51 AM
49

Becoming? Just try walking around with a little girl holding her hand
/r/MensRights05/06/12 11:44 AM
15

Typical feminist propaganda. Men's problems are either not real problems or caused by men themselves while all women's problems are an equality issue.
/r/MensRights17/05/12 01:49 PM
11

I fully agree. This is what they mean, not this
/r/seduction15/05/12 11:44 PM
30

It depends what you're offering. In certain mood girls are only looking for fun, no matter whether they're intelligent or not.
/r/seduction15/05/12 11:40 PM
1

There's a lot of debate on the issue. Hence, I would recommend trying what's best for you. There are surprisingly big differences between individuals. What works for me, might not work for you. Though, I could imagine that being too long in hunger might trigger the starvation mode and then losing weight becomes extremely hard.
/r/seduction13/05/12 07:13 AM
2

These back alley circumcisions are exclusive to religion.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 07:02 AM
3

Yup, I know the feeling. Had the same challenge. For the first 50lb I have to thank low carb diet. Unfortunately it ended me up within healthy BMI (22-23) and bodyfat ~15-16%. For four years I tried different ways for carbing from keto to paleo but nothing took me under 14%. Finally I just cut calories. Small portions eaten frequently. No hunger and as a bonus I can eat sugary treats. Caloric restriction put me to ~10%. Probably could go under but visible six pack is enough for me. And before cl…
/r/seduction12/05/12 08:51 PM
19

God's will, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/12 04:12 PM
30

You have a valid point but there are two sides to the coin. Clubs are visual environment because, like you said, music is too loud for talking. Hence, physique, clothing and body language are the keys. I remember also hating clubs when I was younger and fatter. But after losing weight to 10% body fat and gaining some muscle mass, it all turned around. Girls started to approach me in clubs and pick-ups became very easy. Plus, like some already mentioned, escalating is effortless. You might argue …
/r/seduction12/05/12 11:26 AM
1

Yes, that's a normal reaction. But when you overcome it, you have the advantage. These high-value guys are not used to be challenged. If you do, surprisingly often you win. And by winning I mean the women choose you, not the natural.
/r/seduction06/05/12 07:14 PM
1

Being almost the same age he was when they locked him up, I can't even began to imagine the torture he went through. Not to mention the physical one -- how rapists are treated in prison, but losing everything you have. Everyone close to him thought he was a killer and a rapist for sixteen years. It must've been almost like dying. Or even worse, as you see the ones who love you turning to hate you. No matter how much you try to convince them you didn't do it. Just put yourself into his shoes for …
/r/MensRights29/04/12 04:59 PM
9

http://www.reddit.com/r/Economics/comments/se3ag/its_time_that_we_end_the_equal_pay_myth_forbes/
/r/MensRights17/04/12 02:46 PM
1

Just like in any sports, without training, gifted will never be as good as those who train relentlessly. Naturals also apply a small set of skills they've managed to master that work only on a narrow set of women. Hence, if the woman doesn't fall for his looks and 'natural behavior', he is not able to adapt. Typically that leaves them women who actually are untrustworthy.
/r/seduction09/04/12 06:40 AM
-3

It's not about women, it's about you. As your skills increase, eventually there is no woman who can withstand your seduction. I'm a happily married man and trust my wife but also acknowledge that a skilled PUA could make my wife fall for him. At the same time I trust more to fellow PUAs to honor the rule of avoiding married women.
/r/seduction08/04/12 08:07 PM
10

If this happened to a woman, the feminist movement would go batshit crazy
/r/MensRights23/03/12 07:00 PM
2

As simple as it sounds, it just doesn't work like that for men. It's not even the women I mind but the male co-workers. I will lose their respect.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:12 AM
15

Just to remember, this applies only to men. I work with a few dozen nurses and they definitely are not afraid to express their lust. The company parties are the worst but even during normal office hours they may joke about wanting me to sit on their lap or comment how nice my ass is. And they're not the pretty young nurses, but middle aged, fat and ugly ones who I couldn't be less attracted to.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 02:47 PM
3

Start with her left. If she is able to maintain the eye contact, try the right eye.
/r/seduction18/02/12 09:09 PM
0

It definitely does. If you choose the dominant eye, she feels less uncomfortable, but then again, to be able to take control, you need to stare to the weaker eye. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocular_dominance
/r/seduction18/02/12 05:54 PM
10

Unless you're a man offering a sexual favor to female taxi driver. It would give you a sexual harassment charge.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 12:59 PM
13

By these standards I would've been a serial rapist by the age of six
/r/MensRights31/01/12 06:16 PM
2

Indeed it was, and, sadly, that debunking was as useless as any logical argument against feminists.
/r/MensRights21/01/12 09:22 PM
24

That's not entirely true. There are plenty of genuinely funny guys who never get laid. Making her laugh is the fast track in making her feel comfortable with you.
/r/seduction31/12/11 03:40 PM
7

WTF, she got £11.000. No matter whether the allegations were true or not, there should NEVER be financial motivator to accuse anyone!
/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:35 AM
1

Funny certainly, sadly, many of those ending up in the friend zone never realize being there.
/r/seduction20/12/11 10:58 AM
11

"Between 55 to 60 per cent of all new doctors, lawyers and accountants are now female." So, why don't we have male quotas? Ahh, stupid question..
/r/MensRights03/12/11 06:04 PM
1

Yup, I didn't mean to generalize it to every encounter I have, just bad wording. You put it better -- 'when she is attracted'. The signs aren't always there but when they're, I can recognize them within few seconds or let's say in 20-30 seconds to be more realistic. But the latter statement I stand by, you can assess the challenge -- like in any sports -- when you meet your opponent.
/r/seduction02/12/11 09:18 PM
18

You deserve more upvotes. While growing up, some of my best friends were naturals. We went to nightclubs together a lot but they never succeeded to tell me what I was doing wrong. Only after reading PUA guides I understood how to train myself. Now I've been doing my best in passing the knowledge to other AFCs.
/r/seduction17/11/11 05:45 PM
6

Never mind about the no-fap rule, it's the least of your worries. A bit over a decade ago I was also 60lb overweight. I couldn't even imagine a girl being attracted to me. After losing that and gaining additional 30lb of muscle in addition to LASIKing my glasses away, girls in night clubs walk up to me to ask my number. I don't consider my face that attractive but it seems the physique plays a major part in the game.
/r/seduction16/11/11 12:04 PM
6

Yeah, but not in math and it's discrimination towards women. Since it's pretty hard to fix that, maybe we should ban math all together. Who needs it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/11/11 09:11 PM
13

I'm sure systematically adding +10% to women's math scores will fix that problem..
/r/MensRights12/11/11 05:28 PM
11

Like masculinists say, feminism has created a perfect setting for men. Especially for us, PUAs. Why the heck would we commit when we can have all the perks of a relationship and no downsides?
/r/seduction06/11/11 09:26 AM
9

I'm sure they'll drop the charges as soon as feminazis wake up to support her. If not, it won't take long until there's 'evidence' of abusing, molesting or otherwise violent husband.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 01:22 PM
4

Yes, it's not only the brainwashing that all men are evil but also that women are always good. No matter what they do. It encourages women, even your daughter, to act violently. She might even think 'since men are so violent, I better be preemptive and keep him (future boyfriend) down'.
/r/MensRights27/10/11 12:29 PM
3

That's a good definition. Like in any activity -- study the masters and repeat until you're one of them.
/r/seduction21/10/11 05:02 PM
2

Yes, it's like in all sports -- learn the techniques, choose the best fit for yourself and become the best in it. Don't try to be the jack of all trades.
/r/seduction10/10/11 05:37 PM
7

In addition of those actions being punishable, as a tax payer, I think these women should pay the whole process. If you make a false fire alarm for fun or shut down a mall by giving a false bomb threat, you're bound to face financial consequences. Hundreds if not thousands of man hours of policemen, lawyers, clerks and other officials are wasted. And those hours are away from real criminal cases. It's simply not right that my taxes are wasted on s* like this. Make the women pay.
/r/MensRights03/10/11 06:18 PM
4

If you reach his level of fame, you have the right to be picky. So are women.
/r/seduction18/08/11 05:14 PM
2

Wouldn't it be ironic if he had actually raped her after making the video
/r/MensRights08/08/11 09:52 AM
3

Like polyphasic said, it's about outsmarting them, not being right. But of course you need to know the starting point correctly. Perfumes are hard but luxury brand clothes and accessories a lot easier. Recognizing a Gucci handbag or Prada dress will accomplish the same.
/r/seduction10/07/11 03:24 PM
2

Do they rank foreigners all in the same group or are guys from some countries more preferable than others? (both, for girls and their families)
/r/seduction09/07/11 01:20 PM
6

Sounds like a sports review from a guy who is too lazy to exercise.
/r/seduction06/07/11 09:14 AM
1

You have a valid point regarding being slutty or not. But that's a gender equality issue, not related to Seddit at all. Yes, some PUAs are chauvinistic and have double standards. You're free to disagree or even despise them but don't blame the art for it. When it comes to 'the real connection', I find it a bit ironic because that's exactly what women tell me. PUA tricks are not necessary to create that connection, they just make it easier or in some cases possible when it otherwise wouldn't be. …
/r/seduction17/06/11 11:26 PM
1

No offense taken. It was a valid point. Among non-PUA alphas it's more than common to even abuse the innocence of a girl. I wouldn't be a PUA if I did that. The behaviour sickens and saddens me.
/r/seduction17/06/11 10:06 PM
2

The right word is liberating, not corrupting. I'm well aware what I'm doing but the goal is to make the girl feel good. Not dirty. My pleasure comes from opening up their minds, giving them new experiences, a new world to explore.
/r/seduction17/06/11 09:56 PM
1

They're just people like everyone else. Thinking them being famous is only your mindset. Reframe yourself above them. Besides, very few of them have actually learned the alpha way. I.e. they've not been challenged often. You have the advantage.
/r/seduction17/06/11 09:48 PM
1

How come women always disagree with PUA stuff but it still works so efficiently? Yes, I know why normal women disagree with it, but someone who actually reads these forums and sees behind the curtain, how can you disagree with the facts?
/r/seduction17/06/11 09:41 PM
1

Interesting that so many PUAs seem to think the older women are more challenging. I interact a lot with nurses on daily basis. Most of them are in their late 20's or early to mid 30's. I couldn't imagine an easier group to prey on. Most of them understand their attractiveness is in descent and they're desperate to feel wanted. Give them that feeling and they're yours.
/r/seduction16/06/11 01:13 PM
2

Confidence. Escalation. Like always. You just need to set the direction and it'll roll in the right way step by step. When you feel the momentum, keep the discussion theme and it continues naturally. Set the mindset and target before entering the discussion. But if you've problems keeping the conversation going, focus on that first. When you master that and the girl feels relaxed talking to you, it's easy to bring up anything you want. Some points -- Make her feel comfortable. Kino a lot, smile,…
/r/seduction16/06/11 10:49 AM
1

Out of curiosity, how do you lure in three girls at once? I mean getting each one separately can be done easily, but to be able to suggest a threesome, you also need to make the girls feel comfortable around each other. Did they already know each other? Were they openly bi or did you have to convince them?
/r/seduction07/06/11 12:24 PM
6

My fellow PUAs, give your best shot, how would've you reacted to her 'Could you please stop staring at me'?
/r/seduction21/05/11 12:30 PM
7

Out of curiosity, why is rape is common in US prisons? Where I live (Finland), it's almost nonexistent.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 11:52 AM
2

So when you do praise her, how do you do it?
/r/seduction16/04/11 03:30 PM
2

Any good tips on detecting the indicators of her 'falling behind in value'? Of course by a gut feeling but sometimes it's not clear. I actually have this particular case which is the reason for asking the question. She works and hangs around with beta males (nerds -- in positive sense, I used to be one too), thus I assume she doesn't get a lot of compliments. Yet she is probably HB9 or would be if she ever wore any make-up or didn't dress like a guy. Maybe she is just so confident of her value t…
/r/seduction16/04/11 02:56 PM
10

Just like me a decade ago. Now I can't fall in love at all.
/r/seduction15/04/11 04:38 PM
3

At least it gets one thing right, if you turn yourself into an asshole alpha, you will get any woman you want. Unfortunately for your ex, in real life it's not your ex who you want to have after the transformation.
/r/MensRights11/04/11 07:11 AM
6

Learning the art at that age probably means you turned handsome after puberty. Lucky bastard. Getting HB9 to check you out without any PUA tricks means you're HB9 in her eyes as well. But I salute you, most men as handsome as you're don't give a * about the art. When you have both, the skills and the looks, there's no limit what you can get. Good luck, sir!
/r/seduction20/02/11 05:25 PM
1

Nothing bad. Just can't remember much business wise relevant from the trip because instead of concentrating on work, I concentrated on charming the ladies. I can imagine the other fellows thinking I'm an ass for not focusing on the matter in hand, but on entertaining the ladies. Though for some reason the ladies didn't mind ignoring the business topics.
/r/seduction05/02/11 08:07 AM
1

I think the women left were better off. I managed to raise positive emotions in them. It's the men I'm more worried about.
/r/seduction05/02/11 06:04 AM
1

Answer to your simple question is no. Sometimes it's like sport fishing, knowing what you can get without taking it.
/r/seduction03/02/11 02:29 PM
2

My name hints the age, 34. I can tell you one thing, it's not just the hormones. I felt the spark until about a ten years ago when I started to learn the art. The latter point might be on to something. There's a special brand of girls. Call them soulmates or perfect matches, but so rare they are that you almost never get a chance to talk to one. When you see her, it feels like time freezes. And when she vanishes in the crowd, it's already too late to react. I'd say I've seen a half of dozen of t…
/r/seduction22/01/11 05:29 PM
2

Good tips. But the first is wrong. The most masculine, alpha position of hands is in front pockets thumbs outside -- highlighting your genitalia (according to Allan Pease). The described back pockets position is also dominating but 'secretly dominating' as you were trying hide the authority. To the third point I'd also like to add that it depends a lot where you're directing your eye contact. Between eyes is the most neutral. If you want to take a grip of the person, look at her weaker eye. I.e.…
/r/seduction24/12/10 09:05 AM
1

Duplicate, but I don't care, I'll vote this up no matter how many time it's posted.
/r/MensRights12/12/10 10:14 AM
0

Yes, of course, but I don't see that speculation following the actual police report: "According to a police report obtained by the Daily Mail in August, she and Assange had sex, and at some point the condom broke. While she was apparently not happy about the condom breaking, the two were seen the next day at the seminar, and nothing appeared amiss." http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/sex-by-surprise-at-heart-of-julian-assange-criminal-probe/19741444
/r/MensRights07/12/10 06:30 PM
11

They're not lying but broken condom is called a rape only in Sweden. Edit: reference added: "According to a police report obtained by the Daily Mail in August, she and Assange had sex, and at some point the condom broke. While she was apparently not happy about the condom breaking, the two were seen the next day at the seminar, and nothing appeared amiss." http://www.aolnews.com/world/article/sex-by-surprise-at-heart-of-julian-assange-criminal-probe/19741444
/r/MensRights07/12/10 04:18 PM
2

As many have pointed out, confidence is the key. You can easily test whether you have it enough or not. If you dress up to stand out from the crowd, do you feel awkward or enjoy the attention? When you reach the latter, girls will notice you.
/r/seduction21/11/10 09:10 AM
1

You already got a good set of answers regarding why this happens and how to avoid it in future, but here's a bit more extensive guide which allows you to get rid of all fears. http://happybrainstorm.com/index.php/Brave-Conquer-your-fears-and-phobias-Psychological-Inoculation.html
/r/seduction06/11/10 11:29 AM
2

I think that depends more on psychological factors. Some of us are confident to begin with but that confidence has been crushed down (typically) during puberty. The other end of guys never had that confidence. I would go with Freud here and say it depends on your mother relationship (for men). So the ones who gain confidence through learning social skills, don't consider it being really part of themselves but something artificially generated.
/r/seduction06/11/10 11:14 AM
1

Along even further development, I would add as the final stage, disillusionment. Reaction to that varies. Personally I got depressed. I had always thought that humans were something special but in the end, even the most intelligent ones could be manipulated so easily -- like any other animal species. (I'm not referring only to gaming with women but to NLP and other techniques that can be used on anyone)
/r/seduction06/11/10 11:03 AM
2

It certainly was a culture shock after merging with a Swedish company. Four out of my five guy development team took a year off within two years. (secretly I envied them)
/r/MensRights04/11/10 08:23 PM
1

Ok, but is there relation between the harshness of the neg and the HB level you're gaming? Should the neg be in correlation to her self image/confidence or are all negs as effective to all HBs?
/r/seduction30/10/10 04:43 PM
1

Thanks, so what you're saying is that do not crack a nut with a sledgehammer? I.e. the way I did it, should be only used in extreme situations if nothing else works? That certainly sounds logical, as for a newbie in the game it is easy to go overboard. Hopefully with a bit of a training, I'll find the balance.
/r/seduction30/10/10 04:27 PM
4

Sorry, English is not my first language (or even second), hence how I described the situation here does not match the way I acted in real life. I'm quite aware how to talk to a girl in 'cool way'. And yes, disgusted is an insult but it's not the word I used in my mother-tongue. It was a lot less insulting but couldn't find a better match in English.
/r/seduction30/10/10 04:04 PM
4

But they all look so rapeable, I just can't control myself!
/r/MensRights13/10/10 07:13 PM
7

No you don't, the amount of women available to you just decreases exponentially in proportion to distance from being rich.
/r/MensRights19/08/10 12:30 PM
2

A beta male would've panicked, become nervous and apologetic. Instead you kept your cool, stated a rational question and declared a resolution. She interpreted it as self-confidence and assumed you to be an alpha. Btw. Acting like an alpha doesn't make you a douche.
/r/seduction11/08/10 12:57 PM
2

Research has shown that women are at least as aggressive, violent, abusive, dishonest and dangerous as men are, but they're still treated like they were unable to act in negative way. Thanks, feminists, I believe we've finally reached equality?
/r/MensRights04/08/10 10:54 AM
0

Sad bad true.
/r/seduction03/08/10 06:26 AM
7

Of course you're right, but I would guess the amount of testosterone and estrogen produced by your body influences on these traits.
/r/MensRights01/08/10 08:58 AM
4

Dale Carnegie was certainly a pioneer in influencing human behavior. That book changed my life as well. Afterwards I continued to his successors. Eventually to NLP, Neill Strauss etc. I've often wondered why this area of human psychology is so neglected in scientific community. For example what Neil Strauss does/did, is easily verifiable empirically. It's just too much of a taboo ('only animals can be influenced'?). Though that suits me well, better to minimize the amount of people able to under…
/r/seduction22/07/10 04:06 PM
1

Good luck with that!
/r/seduction09/07/10 09:55 AM
5

That's just not possible. We all know only men are evil abusers! <very sad sarcasm, sniff>
/r/MensRights09/01/10 06:08 PM
16

Considering how much women are fighting for equality, it scares me how much they misuse their position. The case described is not unique. I've heard many similar ones. Even a coworker of mine had his kids taken away from him because his ex claimed him beating her. And this was a nerd whose ex was twice as big as him.
/r/MensRights14/11/09 07:40 AM
10

It would be real equality if he could choose to either pay child support or to care for the child (and then receive child support from the ex-wife). Unfortunately men practically never have the latter option.
/r/MensRights02/12/08 12:45 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter