TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Usherai Archive

View 0 posts and 656 comments by Usherai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I would agree but they hamster that so long as your sole focus is yourself or your mission or whatever that it still counts.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 09:44 PM
2

Pretty much. Though shortly the chorus of MGTOW will arrive to proclaim how you can totally date, fuck girls, get married, etc and still be a "MGTOW". They're another group that has diluted a definition to the point where it means absolutely nothing.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:50 AM
6

It's at age 15 (in Spanish, quince), but yeah, girls of that age being considered to be suitable for marriage, fucking, having children is historically pretty standard.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:47 AM
7

Feminism hasn't led to the death of millions Unless you consider abortion. Then feminism is worse than Nazis, Stalin, and Mao combined. the stunting of scientific advancement for nearly 1000 years The ONLY possible reason you could hold this opinion of Christianity in particular is sheer ignorance. You are literally an ignorant retard if you think this.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:39 AM
6

Religion will never, ever die. Christianity might in the west, but don't think for a second that it won't be replaced by something else.
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 01:36 AM
7

That's not a legitimate concern if you aren't a pro. In sparring you don't take super hard hits to the head, and it takes a long time of heavy abuse before you're all shaky like Ali was.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 12:59 AM
1

http://www.amazon.com/Climate-Change-Reconsidered-Nongovernmental-International/dp/1934791288 http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/a-world-famous-chemist-tells-the-truth-theres-no-scientist-alive-today-who-understands-macroevolution/
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 07:29 PM
24

I've had 4 relationships and can tell this is a good girl. The hamstering starts here. You want to think she's a good girl, and she may display attributes that good girls have...but that doesn't really mean anything. Putting her in the "good girl" category was the first fatal mistake. I guarantee that you treated her differently because of that. You wanted her approval, to see that you were good for her, whatever. You made her the prize and that fundamental thing has affected everything else you…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:30 AM
1

Generally speaking, yes, though what is considered "honorable" varies. Even gang members are honorable as fuck, and extremely loyal. Their honor and loyalty is to a shit thing, but the fact that honor and loyalty matter to them is an example of male instinct in action.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:14 AM
20

Next her. You can't fix her. In all likelihood she wants to be fucked up so she can use it for attention and validation. These women are toxic.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:11 AM
1

This is both a public service and a good way to enjoy the lulz.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:08 AM
2

For the most part, TRP handles LTRs poorly. I wouldn't say that. I'd say that the majority of TRP focus is in short term things or plates, which doesn't always translate well to LTRs. Heartiste has a wealth of knowledge for LTR game, which mostly amounts to maintaining attraction, giving stability/comfort, and using reward and punishment to mold a girl.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 09:58 AM
1

Egalitarian Christians is basically an oxymoron. The Bible also says that men are to be the leaders of their wives, spiritually and otherwise.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 09:48 AM
1

All women are inherently dishonorable, just like how all women naturally hold that feelings trump logic. Honor simply isn't part of their nature. It can be trained out of them though, via strong male influence.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 09:45 AM
1

Those 3 things summarize the reasoning behind it well. I just ignore it. I might affect a sort of confused, bewildered look and then say "...ok. Anyway. blah blah blah."
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 09:39 AM
8

If it's his he should fight for custody. Spending a shitload on legal fees to make that happen will be cheaper than the alternative.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 07:09 PM
2

He will probably have 18+ years of child support for a brat raised by a spiteful ex.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 06:36 PM
1

Which have all been debunked. Prime mover logic hasn't, nor have many actually been debunked. Argued, but not well. Considering the mountains of evidence for both evolution and climate change, I don't see how that makes sense—unless you're arguing purely from emotions. There is evidence for evolution, although constant revision of the theory is needed whenever they find something that doesn't fit. It's a good start, but it needs a LOT of work before it even comes close to credible. The only reas…
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 06:29 PM
48

I worked as a dishwasher in a restaurant for a bit. I had to clean the bathrooms in the mornings and the women's bathroom was ALWAYS dirtier than the men's.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 08:06 PM
1

No, he could get cute girls. Probably not 8+ but 6s and 7s are easy to get.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:40 PM
1

Where did 5'5 come into it? That had absolutely nothing to do with what I was saying. YOU made that leap. I'm only pointing out that ugly dudes can get girls. Height helps, sure, but if height alone got you pussy then his brother would be getting it. It is not an absolute that if you aren't attractive you can't get laid. Social status and charisma are attainable for even your 5'5 ugly dude, and if he was on point with those he'd get laid too.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:28 PM
1

At its core, every religion requires people to believe in something supernatural that either can't be proven or is blatantly false. This runs counter to intellectual honesty and accepting reality as it is. Considering that a vast majority of the greatest minds in history were devoutly religious, I really don't see how that makes sense. And there are dozens of logical proofs of god that have been made throughout the ages. It's far easier to believe in a god than in something like Darwinian evolut…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:08 PM
1

A guy with really tight game can consistently get one night stands. There are more than enough women to go around for the top level men, whether they're top in looks or game.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 10:10 PM
-1

6'3'', so he's 97.3rd percentile in male height. You start off by disqualifying everything you have to say after that. His little brother is the same height, has a better face, and is a 25 year old virgin, despite being in the top fraternity at his school, because he has a shitty personality. But wait, that must be impossible since being over 6'2 or whatever guarantees you unlimited cute pussy for life. Do looks and height matter? Sure. Are they required to fuck cute girls? No. Don't be one of t…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 09:45 PM
1

There is if you don't think all religion is bullshit. And morality can't even exist in an atheistic worldview, but I get your point.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 09:38 PM
1

asking about my investments and assets, my living situation, what I own and don't The 5 year plan isn't a problem, the above is. Especially on a first date. You can't tell if you like a person enough for an LTR based on their investments and home ownership. Clearly the woman is sizing him up to fill the role of Provider. I respect your perspective, but becoming defensive when another person disagrees reveals your insecurity, weakness, and ignorance Do you even understand what the word "defensive…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 09:36 PM
2

Standards of beauty have some leeway but they're not completely relative. Fat girls will never be beautiful. By fat I mean lacking the .7 waist hip ratio. For the most part beauty is objective and static. Heartiste has covered this on many occasions if you want to look more into it.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 12:46 AM
19

My only objective rule is that I would never LTR a woman if she didn't fuck me faster than any other guy.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 12:43 AM
2

The biggest problem with religious upbringing these days is that for men it makes a virtue out of being a doormat that lets people fuck them. They're all about the "gentle as doves" thing and neglect "wise as serpents". They praise meekness but forget that it is literally impossible to be meek without strength and power. Being nice is not a moral virtue. Religion these days has no balls. That said, I'm no atheist and I think an old school, orthodox style Christianity is the pinnacle of moral beh…
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 12:37 AM
-1

My best friend is tall (6'3), but he's objectively a pretty ugly motherfucker. He gets far more than his fair share of decent pussy (i.e. 7's and even occasional 8's) because he's so absurdly delusional and outgoing that it doesn't matter. I have personally seen him pick up cute girls in bars and heard them fooling around at least 50 times. If he was a loser he'd be fucking 3's and 4's. If he was even moderately attractive he'd be fucking 8's regularly. Point is, even an ugly dude can fuck cute …
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 12:23 AM
2

Well put, and as might be noted, it fits into the TRP framework, just in a different situation. ♂
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 07:48 AM
32

If a 30-something woman asks about your assets and investments on a first date and you DON'T get paranoid...you're a fucking idiot.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 07:37 AM
2

This isn't a moral conundrum. You already know it's morally wrong to fuck your ex. My only practical consideration is that the ex being possessive and semi-stalkerish is sounding like she's getting a little crazy and trying to lock you down, and it's always a bad idea to stick your dick in crazy.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 07:20 PM
2

Good stuff man. Interactions with women are definitely better when there's emotional investment, and it can be hard to not let it get to an unhealthy point, but as you said: Those emotional peaks and valleys are what makes the chaos of human existence worthwhile. Most guys here probably aren't to the point of being able to appreciate, or even manage that properly, but it is something that needs to be kept in mind. ♂
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 05:05 AM
2

So I want her to be the one to ask to reconnect directly. This is problematic. Women don't communicate directly very often. She's wanting to meet so that you can reconnect.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 04:57 AM
5

I joined a fraternity my sophomore year of college because my best friend from middle school did it and talked me into it. I'm glad I did. involve spinning plates, leadership, and focusing on your own goals. Plate spinning the sororities is abundant. If you join and are involved in the fraternity there are a lot of opportunities to practice leadership and management skills that you don't really find too much in college. Being an officer in a fraternity or inter-fraternity council or whatever is …
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 04:43 AM
18

You don't have a meal on the first date at all.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 07:24 AM
6

Moral values instilled in upbringing, combined with proper roles.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 05:48 AM
2

The military doesn't really pay loans off for officers. They do it (to a certain amount) for enlisted.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 05:47 AM
1

The Bible can't give itself authority. That's circular reasoning. There's many factors in play there. Societal norms would be a key factor. Understanding of biology would come into play. Now we know that unused sperm and eggs are destroyed by the body naturally. Spilling seed is not any worse than sperm being destroyed in the testicles. I don't think that's really the issue. It's more that sex is a divine gift and jerking off or using contraceptives etc is a corruption of that. If you just look …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:31 PM
1

Although his sin was not really sexual in nature at its root. I agree. That is still opinion and not mentioned in the bible. What gives the Bible sole authority on what is fact or opinion? Furthermore, the Bible was put together by a council of Christians who also rejected many "gospels" and other writings as being inaccurate or contrary to Christianity. To trust that the Bible is accurate you have to also trust that the early Christians had the authority to say what is and what is not Christian…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 07:11 PM
1

We openly celebrate the millions of dismemberments of human babies that happen every year. How is that celebrating human life? I get your point that we aren't the worst country, but that doesn't mean we aren't utterly corrupt too.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 05:55 PM
1

In secular or religious matters? In secular issues as far as I know the only people she couldn't (rightfully) instruct or teach would be her husband or partents, and elders.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 05:52 PM
1

Since Catholics sort of established the Bible in the first place, I don't see how things that were taught as truth BEFORE the Bible are just "added". "The voluntary spilling of semen outside of intercourse between man and woman is a monstrous thing. Deliberately to withdraw from coitus in order that semen may fall on the ground is doubly monstrous. For this is to extinguish the hope of the race and to kill before he is born the hoped-for offspring." John Calvin "Those sins that dishonor the body…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 05:48 PM
3

And with how utterly corrupt and morally bankrupt our culture is, it's nothing less than we deserve.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:46 AM
1

First, you can't confuse education with intelligence. Some of the more interesting and well rounded people I've known didn't have degrees. Secondly, a woman who claims that these things (education, intelligence, etc) are issues are guaranteed to be fucked up. Lastly, I agree with your overall point, to a degree. However I think disposition is FAR more important that education or intelligence for women. From what I've seen, more intelligent women translates to more acrobatic hamsters, and it's a …
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:44 AM
1

A loose conglomeration of independent bloggers. As far as I know this sub is the first community dedicated purely to Rep Pill ideas, but many independent people have been talking about the same things for a while, and on PUA forums many of these topics have been broached before.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 10:35 AM
1

I didn't say it was limited to that. Certainly women aren't allowed to religiously instruct men, which is what the passage you quoted was about. A woman in that position would be instructing children, younger women, and servants. I doubt that would extend to her telling her husband how to go about his affairs, but if you can make a case for that I'll examine it.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:44 AM
2

As far as I know TRP and PUA (not puahate) sprang out of the same time and were quite overlapping. Basically a bunch of guys wanted to learn women, they started figuring out what works and why. Some of those guys stuck with pure game, some delved into the underlying principles. Many (like heartiste and roosh) do both. TRP would not exist without PUA, because trying to get laid was the initial start to really examining female behavior. I would say that TRP has transcended PUA in that it looks bey…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 09:27 AM
1

Not explicitly, no. It does condemn certain things. However Catholics also use tradition to guide their views. So, if the consensus of the earliest Christians was that contraception was bad, then it's bad. Even as it says in the Bible, not all truth is in the Scripture. So there's a good reasoning that early Christian communities were more fully accurate as to what was and wasn't good.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 06:19 AM
1

The peasants of the same age didnt recite this bullshit, nor do younger people of the same education level. The most educated were the most brainwashed. same. fucking. thing. Exactly. The problem of moderately intelligent people is that they're smart enough to understand it, but not smart enough to see the flaws. Intelligence is extremely important, and is a great quality, but like anything else if you don't use it productively it can be a negative. Just like the people who get brainwashed while…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 05:30 AM
1

Lol. Just ask yourself what range of intelligence is most likely to NOT believe that intelligence matters, and the range of most of the liberal idiots who like to ignore reality in favor of idealism.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 05:04 AM
1

That's a whole different can of worms. I will just say that intelligence isn't always a positive, and most of the people who do the stupidest things are around the 115-130 range.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:55 AM
27

And none of those will ever "intimidate" you.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:46 AM
1

Dominance, strength, power etc are all valued in Christianity (though not in the modernist, liberal churches). Meek, biblically speaking doesn't mean anything close to what you think it means either. King David is a great example. The bible says he was a man after god's own heart. He also killed a giant motherfucker, had tons of women, and even had a chick's husband killed so he could fuck her. This whole passive/weak bullshit is only a product of modern christians.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:45 AM
2

This is the Catholic position The TL;DR is that fucking your wife and using contraception, or even actively not trying to procreate, has been condemned every time it has appeared in the Bible. Furthermore, not only did every Protestant religion forbid contraceptives until the early 1900's, there are numerous writings from the earliest Church fathers, i.e. Bishops from like 100-300 AD who also condemned contraceptives as well as pulling out.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:40 AM
1

Even in the New Testament old, virtuous women are encouraged to instruct young women. Titus 2: 3-5 Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, so that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:33 AM
5

http://www.catholic.org/bible/ If you want a hard copy any bookstore should have one and I'm sure you could go to the local church and get one. Just make sure that it's a Catholic Bible, i.e it contains Tobit Judith Wisdom Sirach Baruch 1 Maccabees 2 Maccabees
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:31 AM
3

I'm sure that adds to the hashtag count, but regardless the fact that they're so defensive about it means that it touched a nerve.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:21 AM
71

True. The exact same thing applies for "career" or "intelligence". Those things generally mean A. She'll never place you or her family as a priority and B. She's an obnoxious cunt who always thinks she knows better than you. It's not intimidation, it's that those traits aren't desirable for a woman in an LTR. Of course, it's so much easier and self-assuaging to just blame men being intimidated, especially with a horde of white knights to validate that idea.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:19 AM
1

I wouldn't suggest they're a magical cure or anything either, and zinc may do absolutely nothing. All I'm saying is that it's something that I strongly believe helped my brother with the same problems, so I offered it as a possible solution. No harm in trying it.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 04:14 AM
1

Really? The U.S. National Research Council recommends 15 milligrams of zinc daily for adult men and women. Zinc deficiency can lead to immune system problems, decreased lean body mass and lower testosterone levels. Stunted growth and cognitive impairment could also result from zinc deficiency. Severe zinc deficiency could lead to alopecia (hair loss), diarrhea, emotional disorders, weight loss, infections, hypogonadism in males and problems with ulcer healing. And testosterone The effect of test…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 08:24 PM
1

He had also started working out some, mostly pullups/pushups etc. I recommended zinc just for the testosterone boost and his anxiety started greatly diminishing not too long after that. Maybe it was exercise or maybe zinc, or maybe a combination. He was still living at home, largely staying in his room when he started being more outgoing.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 08:09 PM
2

Glad you said it dude, because I've always had the same thing when I've worked with women. I worked at a restaurant with a 40ish female boss who was married but liked me, and I spent most of my time flirting with and giving shit to the chicks that worked there. I had two hot high school hostesses having me compare their tits and asses. And pretty much every girl there would turn on any girl who gave me shit. I even fucked a waitress in a booth one morning. I later worked with the same female bos…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 09:02 AM
1

Cool. Regarding your post, I don't think that that's actually the case. I think it's more that the language used is mostly hyperbole and in large part to sort of kick women off their high horse. I'd agree that many women (though I wouldn't go so far as to say a majority) can do very well academically and be pretty knowledgeable about their areas of study. I personally know a few girls who are doctors and lawyers who do know their shit fairly well. Still seen them break down and cry over stupid s…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:01 AM
2

I apologize for being unduly harsh. You're wrong, and your tone irritated me. Nevertheless, I was probably a dick about it. But seriously, before you attack somebody on a factual premise you really ought to make sure you're actually right.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:36 AM
4

It's a statement of fact. Regardless, my argument was not "you're dumb so you're wrong." It's that "basic google abilities show a wealth of studies directly contradicting your point, hence you're both wrong, and stupid enough to post like a faggot when you're wrong." Several meta-studies by Richard Lynn between 1994 and 2005 found mean IQ of men exceeding that of women by a range of 3–5 points.[18][19][20][21] Lynn's findings were debated in a series of articles for Nature.[22][23] Jackson and R…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:26 AM
9

statistically speaking, women have a slightly higher IQ, on average, than men. No they don't, you fucking ignorant moron. Men average a few points higher. More importantly, men have a greater deviation from the mean, so nearly every great mind will be a man. If you're not a retard a cursory google search will verify this.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 05:18 AM
10

How do you inspire yourself to attend the gym if you're the kind of person that's always tired (I do eat healthy) and your only reasoning for the gym is to attract girls ? If you're always tired it's probably because you don't lift. Secondly if that's the ONLY reason you go to the gym then there is your issue. But really, if you actually dedicate yourself to lifting some you'll notice drastic improvements. You'll have more energy and confidence and testosterone; which will help you be less anxio…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 04:42 AM
4

I think it was Heartiste who had a solid response along the lines of "Ok cool I'm glad you said it because I was thinking the same thing".
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 04:28 AM
12

My dad told me the "fucking her" one when I was younger.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 04:24 AM
2

Doctors have also heavily advocated a low fat, high carb diet; something they're now starting to retract like motherfuckers on. Modern medicine is good, but it's by no means the end all be all of knowledge. Even fairly recently they've found that the old folk remedy of chicken soup is the most beneficial thing to eat when you're sick. The basic point I want to make is that often times folk remedies have persisted so long for a reason. Until the 21st century science hadn't picked up fucking chick…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 07:48 PM
1

So they had their women burn themselves so they couldn't fuck their conquerors, basically.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 12:45 AM
7

People also become more set in their ways and jaded over the years. If I want a wife, then as a man (i.e. the leader of the relationship), it's in my best interest to have someone who can better adapt to me and my habits, so a young woman. Plus women are almost always more physically attractive when they're younger, and it fades fast.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 12:39 AM
1

Unless you're shooting up and sharing needles, fucking black chicks in the ass raw, or fucking dudes raw, chances of getting HIV are basically nil.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 12:29 AM
2

The Catholic Pope, for example, recently changed official doctrine to "not believe in a hell anymore." That was a hoax and the Pope did nothing of the sort. Edit: Also until recently, gender and sex were totally different concepts, with gender only being attributed to word endings in languages that have the distinction.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 08:20 PM
6

Life experiences also change your genetic makeup. And what's great about being a man is that if you have the balls to do it you can drag yourself above your position through sheer will and be better off. In fact, this stage of civilization is the absolute best time for a genetically inferior male to raise his stock, because so many men, even more genetically advantaged ones, have been emasculated by culture, society, even the food we eat. Today's reproductive culture is in absolute chaos, and ch…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 08:09 PM
1

Ditch those girls. Start playing a sport or doing martial arts, and hit the gym. It's easier in some ways to learn assertiveness when dealing with men, plus it's good practice with social skills. Growing up around betas will basically mean that you don't know how to communicate with other men in a manly way. This translates into your interactions with women.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 07:58 PM
1

And do yourself a favor and stop trying to argue with the men. In this, you're clearly a mexicaaaan't.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 06:05 AM
1

Well if it was something so obvious and universally true, you'd think it would've been brought up in their peer review process. But you know, only the truest information exists on TRP. Peer review is a complete and utter joke, as shown by the many completely unreproducible findings that have been thrown out. EDIT: And before you try to contest this just to be a little faggot that can't use google, here are a couple sources. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 05:55 AM
2

Really? Because you are contesting a scientific study of what women reported as attractive to them. At least they had the decency to provide their information. Failure to control for wrong answers is flawed science. That's not second, that's the same point as your first. No, it's not. The first point is that the method of "science" is flawed. The second point is that conclusions from a false method will produce unreliable results. The authors of the study wrote extensively about dominance and wh…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 10:49 AM
4

They do send the same signals, which is why it works. This author has no logical consistency at all, and is basically engaging in doublespeak. The tennis player winning most of his matches is dominance, as is being assertive and confident. The author basically says "be dominant, but don't be dominant." This is not any sort of rational advice or understanding of manhood and attraction, and in obfuscating the truth with contradictions and unclear language, the author is opposing truth and TRP prin…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:31 AM
2

Another thing is that guys who he ridicules as being obnoxious alphas consistently and everywhere get hot girls. Granted maybe a "better" alpha could get a more quality hot girl, but you can't deny the results.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 12:01 AM
9

First, women can't be trusted to give accurate feedback about what attracts them. This has been well established both by experience and by science. Second, the basis for this whole article is highly flawed because it's based on the feedback of women, which is observably inaccurate. You can't say "X is most desired by women because they say they like it". You can say that "X is most desired by women because show the strongest attraction to it", but this is not what the article does. Third, anothe…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 11:59 PM
6

Yes, but only as an orbiter, not as a lover.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:02 PM
3

Correlation may not be causation, but it is suggestive. Regardless, there is an abundance of evidence and anecdotes that women respond negatively to things they say they want; e.g. talking about your feelings. The obvious disconnect between what women say they want and what they respond to make any idea predicated on what women say they want to be useless at best.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 09:43 PM
40

This is the major problem of this argument: The researchers then asked women to indicate which of the adjectives used to describe John were ideal for a date as well as for a long-term romantic partner. They found that only 1 woman out of the 50 undergraduates in their sample actually identified “dominant” as one of the traits she sought in either an ideal date or a romantic partner. For the rest of the dominant adjectives, the two big winners were confident (72% sought this trait for an ideal da…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 09:22 PM
1

Most reported rapes don't result in convictions because 90% of them are seen to be bogus based on initial investigation, and the other 8% or so don't have this pesky little thing called "evidence".
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:53 PM
1

Sucks for them, but there's absolutely no way to prove that that is the case without video/audio of the incident. Edit: Additionally, the onus of evidence is on the accuser, for good reason. Maybe women need to start recording their sexual encounters, or even better stop being alone with men. There is absolutely no legal system that could ever be put in place that won't result in: A. Letting some rapists get away; or B. Imprisoning some innocent men Plus the fact that women do often make false r…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:51 PM
1

And did she report it and get a toxicology report? The studies I've seen show that there are statistically zero cases of date rape drugs used in rapes. It was always a mix of a shitload of booze and other drugs, i.e. weed/coke/etc.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 04:49 PM
3

All a woman has to do is physically resist and she'll have the injuries as evidence. If she was drugged (which basically never happens) then she'll have drugs in her system that show up on toxicology reports. Problem solved.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 06:17 PM
2

Physical looks are just markers of genetic and reproductive fitness. Obviously, different things matter for men and women. For women, youth is directly tied to their fertility. This is not true for men. Hence some signs of aging in men don't matter that much.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 07:59 PM
1

I'm not aware of a more precise way to describe these things, so yeah I would say that pretty much everyone shit tests each other. Men do this to each other all of the time in sports, fraternities, among friends, etc. Kids and parents shit test each other all the time. Its function is to establish and shift the social hierarchy. The more abuse someone takes, the lower they are. The motivation for this can vary. Some people just want the be the leaders. Some people are just testing the leadership…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 07:51 PM
9

Mothers absolutely shit test, though it's a different form than plates. If her mother is expressing emotional turmoil at her son's choices, she's doing it out of some genuine conviction that what he is doing it is wrong, even if the way she does it is passive-aggressiveness. Intention or consciousness has nothing to do with a shit test. What it amounts to is that mothers, like all women, want the men in their life to be what they want them to be. Breaking out of the mold your mother puts you in …
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 07:51 PM
5

And yet with all the rationalizations in the world her pussy will still be wetter for the old alphas than it ever will be for her beta bucks. The pussy don't lie.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 04:46 PM
3

Not if she's fulfilling her Christian duties.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 06:54 AM
7

Really only a divorce lawyer could give you a proper answer. This sounds like a good way, but who knows how the legal system in your state is structured? Even then the way a divorce plays out depends not only on the laws but also on precedent set in past cases. Just spend the money to hire the best lawyer you can and go from there.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:24 PM
4

The frequency of rape by the old school definition are probably way lower than that.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 05:44 AM
8

So you're saying that being a woman is a mental illness which diminishes a person's decision making ability compared to if they were a man? The flaw in the argument is that this is truth. The main problem in so many areas is that society forgets that, e.g. women's suffrage.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 05:33 AM
5

Fat girls have worse self-esteem than thin women. They hide it under brashness and bravado.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 07:20 PM
1

Note that RPW has 1/10 of the subscribers that TRP has. I don't doubt that there will be a small movement among women, but that won't result in a cultural shift. And the MRM movement is just asking for a somewhat more fair feminism. MRMs are feminists through and through and their success as a movement would do nothing to improve the situation. I would also venture to guess that nearly every single woman that is a supporter of the MRM has had a close acquaintance get screwed over by the system. …
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 05:39 PM
1

What about a woman who's not in her "prime"? Like 35, 40, 45. I see a lot of guys lusting over "cougars". I was at a cocktail party recently and this 45 year-old smoking hot brunette was being hit on by every red blooded male, including myself. So, I don't see how this has to be a huge stumbling block. Cougars are hit on because they're an easy fuck. Regardless, female development isn't about getting dudes to pump a load into the girl, it's about extracting commitment. How many young guys do you…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 04:58 AM
2

Social skills are the most important thing. Like how to easily converse with people, make them laugh or feel at ease. How to introduce people to other people that are useful for them. Having contacts for various things. Having social standing so that if you hang out with someone it raises their social value. Being knowledgeable. Not just about intellectual things but also things like where the cool stuff going on in your city/college is, where to get drugs, music, etc. Being able to fix things. …
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 02:26 AM
3

This is not how girls operate, 99% of the time she will never even consider it being her fault or her problem really. She will if you play it right. Don't forget how horribly insecure women are.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 10:11 PM
13

True. I think what's important to keep in mind is that "good girls" are under a constant barrage of temptation to slack in that discipline. Take a "good girl" and have her make a couple slutty friends and a couple years later she'll be a stupid slut too.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 08:28 PM
1

From the Wiki article: According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, "in 1600 there was no official Catholic position on the Copernican system, and it was certainly not a heresy. When [...] Bruno [...] was burned at the stake as a heretic, it had nothing to do with his writings in support of Copernican cosmology."[49] Similarly, the Catholic Encyclopedia (1908) asserts that "Bruno was not condemned for his defence of the Copernican system of astronomy, nor for his doctrine of the plurali…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 08:25 PM
1

These are all addressed by my earlier point, that the Catholic Church was an uncontested power historically. There was no secular entity with the size and resources of the Catholic Church. It's like saying the American Constitution is the best constitution America has ever had. Well of course it is, it's the only one. China is fairly secular and has never made a great deal of scientific advancements. Same with the Roman Empire. Looking at the various governments through history, particularly his…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 08:20 PM
16

I think something to keep in mind is that even "good girls" aren't immune to solipsism and hypergamy. They've been raised well so they are good wife material. However, it's an easy thing to fall into, well, mainstream culture. This culture is basically a huge cultural push to bring out the worst in women. A woman who is a good girl at 18 may be an attention whore who will only marry a doctor at 22. Even good girls are infused with feminist thoughts about a lot of things.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 08:01 PM
1

Spanish Inquisition is grossly exaggerated. Crusades, particularly the first three, are completely misrepresented. Galileo's "persecution" I tore apart in a comment just now. Not that the Catholic Church has been perfect, but this idea that they've stifled knowledge and at the same time created and funded Universities (along with many scientific advancements) while priests/monks/friars made hundreds of major scientific advancements is really absurd.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:44 PM
1

Considering that the Catholic Church founded Universities and actively promoted science in many forms, and that hundreds of scientific advances have been made by priests/monks/etc, and that many of the greatest minds of history, such as Newton, Euler, et al. were not only Christian, but devout Christians (Newton wrote more about Christianity than he did physics or mathematics)...I think that there is a strong argument that Christianity as least has been a great boon for scientific advancement. W…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:39 PM
2

False. Galileo was put on house arrest for mocking the Pope and continuing to advance his heliocentric model as fact even after numerous scientists had already proven it wrong. What was wrong about Galileo's model was that he had the planets in circular orbits when in reality they follow elliptical orbits. His theory did not match observable data, and it was absolutely incorrect. The only thing he was actually right about was heliocentrism. But! The heliocentric idea had already been put forth a…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:28 PM
-3

You realize about 90% of the bad things the Catholic Church supposedly did are either complete lies or gross distortions, right?
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:16 AM
6

Galileo's theory was wrong, and it was bad science. The Catholic Church has done 100x more for promoting science than conversely.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 07:15 AM
1

Those views are backed up by empirical evidence and vast amounts of experience, i.e. scientific. If I hold the belief that if I jump off a roof I'll fall to the ground it is not an "ideal" that causes this belief but a knowledge of science and experience. Likewise with TRP, the view that improving your physique will make you more attractive to women in general is no ideal. It's a fact. The view that women have a tendency to process information emotionally rather than logically isn't an ideal. It…
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 11:31 PM
0

Depends on if they're laughing with or at you.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 08:41 PM
2

I got it off the sex subreddit, which should be noted has almost as many women posting about wanting more sex (from fwbs and committed relationships mind you) as there are men. That said, judge a piece by its content, not its author. I'd bet money that nearly all these girls are overweight/unattractive.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 08:15 AM
5

It also explains what they mean when they say they like guys that are funny: They like guys who they are attracted to.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:54 PM
4

♂
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:51 PM
1

Don't forget that increase in "diversity" also ruins feelings of community. SF is a diversity utopia
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 07:26 PM
7

I would think that would only be alpha if you simply had no interest in sex or relationships. Otherwise you're just being a passive bitch and not going after what you want.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 08:20 AM
13

Who says we're for equality?
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:30 PM
1

People over in r/fpua think that for some reason women need to have "game" which is ridiculous beyond the advice of "be interesting, look pretty, do stuff" I don't know. There are a lot of little things a girl can do (of course in addition to those things) to increase a guy's commitment or investment in pursuing her.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 07:23 PM
2

The hamster affects all of us. It doesn't always have to be as extreme as murder or relationships either. It does affect all of us in many ways. I used the murder thing to provide a similarly "shocking and sickening" example. Women's behavior and actions can be pretty appalling in relationships. Men are generally not so bad in this but we're bad in different ways. A little perspective I think helps understanding. I wonder, does the TRP women's community delve into the various foibles of men as w…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 06:06 PM
2

I didn't say that it was the grandfather's choice. Only that it did have an impact on him in many ways. My analogy holds. A 16 year old woman is fully capable of understanding things and making choices. The main point though, was that her actions impact people beyond herself. And the father making the crisis solely about him I think is a leap. I really don't trust anyone, but especially a woman, to remember events accurately. I don't doubt that the father might well have expressed concern for he…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 09:45 AM
7

Dread game.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 08:07 AM
1

That's a good distinction, because verbosity without emotion IS pretty pointless.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 08:06 AM
3

Your analysis is spot on. There is also her hamstering that social stigma dictates male attraction. This is pure projection because this really applies to women.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:34 AM
3

We never see it because we don't want to. We want to hope. We want unicorns to exist, so we blind ourselves to reality.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:30 AM
5

Can you give examples of you failing to maintain frame? Generally speaking though, it takes a while to really internalize new behaviors and thought patterns. Maintaining frame consistently with women requires two things: You naturally have a strong frame, aside from women. If you struggle with maintaining a frame throughout your day with strangers and men, then you can't maintain it with a woman that will turn your emotions against you. You understand women, and accept them for what they are. A …
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:29 AM
7

Realistically the grandparents would've raised the kid if need be, so her youth isn't an issue.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 12:22 AM
1

Lots of loquacious dudes get laid like crazy. Extroverted talkers can dominate social settings through conversation. Bitches cream themselves listening to Obama droning on about things they don't even understand just because he can speak well and hits emotional triggers. Brevity is not the only, or the best option, for all TRP men.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 11:57 PM
1

Have you ever had a conversation with a woman? Substance is irrelevant so long as it evokes emotion. Brevity is fine and all, and the best option for most people, but there are a lot of people that have the ability to speak well and engage people.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 11:53 PM
7

You seem overly sensitive. Her shower comment wasn't especially provocative or something to act butthurt over. Just reframe it into you giving her permission to take a shower so she's fresh and ready for you. There's a time for overtly putting your foot down and a time to simply lead through manipulating conversations. This instance is the latter.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 11:49 PM
1

It's likely that he has, knowingly or not, refused to take the leader role. It's a lot easier to not have the responsibility, and many men simply don't want to and hence allow their wives to pick up their slack.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 10:37 PM
48

Men have been brutally murdering other men, women, and children on large scales throughout history and justifying it. I haven't really given a great deal of consideration to what males rationalize, but I don't at all doubt that we rationalize a lot of things as well.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 10:30 PM
1

I had some successes but got into an LTR before I had used it much.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 10:26 PM
2

No problem. One thing I'll add is regarding the text exchange with the whole loving the wife like Christ loves the church etc. Have him read the Gospels and note just how Jesus treats and talks to his disciples. (It's like they're ignorant children that He has to guide and correct.) The last thing He did was supplicate or kiss their asses, or try to make them happy. He constantly corrects, rebukes, contradicts, instructs, and orders them around. Not as a petty tyrant, but to make them better men…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 10:21 PM
1

Ah that's a bit more understandable. In my area it's 10 minutes of tapping and then after the first day maybe a minute or two at best. But even on dead conversations in general I like to use that as an opportunity to say something absurd or test reactions.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:56 PM
1

I don't know about that. Girls are so socially retarded that even if she is keen she won't do anything about it. And in my area at least there aren't all that many girls on tinder.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:11 PM
1

They are red pill with a lot of girls maybe, but they have their unicorns.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:09 PM
1

Haha if TRP will be hated regardless. We could all come out as huge supporters of the LGBT movement and and still be hated.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 09:08 PM
140

This is a lesson that many redpillers refuse to believe until it cockslaps them in the face.♂
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 08:21 PM
1

No problem.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:47 PM
37

He apparently doesn't understand the science backing the idea that women with high partner counts usually have failed marriages. Or the basic concept that promiscuity is a risk for disease, pregnancies (which if ended in abortion cause physiological damage increasing cancer rates and possible infertility), likely use of birth control pills, with the same risks as abortions, the emotional baggage from being used as a cum dump, or the basic concept of "why buy the cow when you can get the milk for…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:45 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:40 PM
0

I would guess most people find the flaming gays to be obnoxious, the gay rights activists to be obnoxious and hostile to straight men, and other than that don't really care about gays. I personally think gays have a mental defect of some sort. Doesn't mean that I hate or fear them. People have lots of mental defects and I don't see being gay as inherently worse than most others. I think gay marriage is basically a sham. I think the same of most heterosexual marriage too, though it at least can b…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:39 PM
1

Plenty of posts irk me too, but such is a mass forum. Personally I've had some TRP stuff taught to me by my father, but most of it I was too idealistic to believe. Then after a few bad experiences with girls I realized that what I was doing and believed was wrong and started to look to find the answer. Over the years TRP, even before TRP existed, started to become proven in my experiences and then a set belief.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:29 PM
1

Why does it matter? As far as sexual strategy goes I'm sure there's one for homosexuals but here is basically focusing on heterosexual sexual strategy, so gays are a non-issue. Or are you just fishing to see if TRP can be branded as "homophobic"?
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:25 PM
1

Personally I wouldn't bother unless you've run out of matches. Why? I've noticed a lot of guys talking about how they would "next" a girl for practically any reason. I could see how this would be useful for a guy starting out so he can learn to care less, but for a more developed RP man I don't understand. It would take like 2 seconds to send some bullshit text and see how it goes. With such little investment, with the possible return of banging a cute Tinder slut, I don't see why "next" is supe…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:21 PM
10

So the father spending 16 years financially and emotionally raising a child, probably trying to give her a good life, and seemingly tried to instill good values. So when she gets drunk and knocked up, fucking up her life and contradicting everything her father valued and tried to teach her, he's not supposed to be insulted? Can a man not feel pride (and thereby shame) in his family? Can a man not be angered at the murder of his grandchild? Everything people do affects other people too. If I brin…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 07:14 PM
2

I'm an INTP as well, though the past few years I'm trending towards ENTJ. If I had to guess, I would say that since most BP people have idealized views of women and love, for INTPs the idea of a unicorn is pretty much their only real hope for love so they simply are hostile to TRP.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 03:34 PM
2

No problem. I know it's quite a contrarian position. And on a more personal level I value a woman who is capable and smart. I respect it. I also know that you can't base policy on outliers, though a good policy will allow for them. Anyway, Vox Day has better arguments, and if you're interested in checking them out, even if it's simply to better understand an opposing view, I would recommend it.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 03:23 PM
6

8=======D~ ~ ~ ~
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 06:54 AM
5

What teachings has he rejected exactly? I don't think there's a single thing in TRP that is in conflict with the Bible. TRP is just awareness of reality. Spinning plates and such isn't really part of the core idea. Really you could look at TRP as being the examination of the nature of women's sinfulness, and the ways to counter it. It's also an awareness that male/female dynamics work best when what is essentially a Biblical model is followed, i.e. men lead and pursue their goals (such as God) a…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 06:49 AM
5

Handsome? Dude looks goofy.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 05:53 AM
1

So you'd say that if a guy and a girl bang once, then the second time he allegedly "rapes" her, and then later she comes to his house and fucks him AGAIN...well that might just be rape? Where is there any shred of evidence whatsoever that he actually raped her? Her word? That means little when her later actions are in 100000% contradiction to her claims.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 04:44 AM
2

I appreciate your reasonableness. A few clarifications though. I am not sure if it is too entirely fair to say that AWALT when it comes to your voting points, this just goes with people in general. I'm not suggesting that all women are like that, or that all men are ideal. What I am saying is that most women are like that. And that's a large enough portion to be significant. Nor do I think it's fair to say women cannot be better at math and/or science than men can be. I think there will always b…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:22 AM
2

Because men and women are very different in many substantial ways. These differences have sweeping effects that are problematic. Women in the military, for example. Even if they actually passed the same physical requirements as men, there would still be problems with them getting knocked up before deployment, crying rape, sleeping with superiors for preferential treatment, etc. Or women voting. Women are more communal, gullible, susceptible to manipulation by fear, less capable of abstract think…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:41 AM
3

Any girl at just about any church in America.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:25 AM
2

Gender equality is an even stupider position than female superiority.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 01:25 AM
5

Dude this situation is crystal clear. She fucked him, got pissed off at him and cried rape, then he calmed her down and they fucked again. You're a complete fucking idiot for even thinking this is anything other than some crazy bitch's mind games. Girls don't continue to voluntarily fuck their rapists, you dumb fuck.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 08:19 AM
3

Just do what Epicureanist said. I'd add that it's likely she'll use a bunch of emotional bullshit to lure you back in. Don't fall for it. If she really wanted you then she wouldn't have been doing all this bullshit. She's shown that she wants to just manipulate you and use you without investing in you herself. She will use so many seemingly plausible reasons, might pull an abuse card, all sorts of shit. Believe nothing, because even if any of it is true she's still broken as a person and you can…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 04:23 PM
6

Why should I not hold the door for them? Because careerist women are basically putting themselves on a playing field with men. They've abandoned the position of inferiority that was the entire reason women were treated chivalrously. Same with single mothers and the other typed I described. They have, knowingly or not, snubbed the traditional model in favor of being empowered womyn. Doing things like holding open the door for them is letting them have their cake and eat it too.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 04:16 PM
13

There is no "correct" response to any given shit test. There are many possible responses and the "best" one depends on the girl, the guy, and the motivations behind the shit test. All these faggots talking about how GLO is a "self-aggrandizing douche bag" are missing the point of his response. They're also forgetting that calling a girl out on her bullshit is a pretty fucking valid response to a shit test. The goal, especially with a girl that's dealt too much with betas, is not to make yourself…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 04:10 PM
5

Chivalry is reserved for women deserving of it. Chivalry lavished on the unworthy is beta. Treat women like your mother as befits what they in turn do and how they act. Treat carouseling, single mother, careerist, feminists, and/or sluts like trash, because they are.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 12:46 AM
1

I would guess the thinking is that someone who so egregiously violates the law is extremely unlikely to be able to make decisions benefiting the community as a whole. But I'm not really sure why that is the law
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 08:17 PM
1

That's in the data too. And single fathers also have poor numbers, though significantly better than single mothers and still far worse than a two parent household.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 12:37 PM
4

Obviously it's more complex. That doesn't mean that women's suffrage isn't a major part. We are a republic. We aren't democratic. That is a pretty lie told to give people a fucked up idea of our government. The "right" to vote has always been limited for a reason (even in Athens, the founder and pinnacle of your "democracy"). You should think about what those various reasons might be. If you subscribe to TRP theory even a little you should realize that women are easily controlled creatures gover…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 06:19 AM
3

However, I know plenty of people who were raised by single moms/dads that turned out successful. Difference was that their parent wasn't a deadbeat. Having a single parent doesn't automatically make a child fare worse in life. No shit. But the data doesn't lie, and single mothers are far, far worse than a man/wife couple, and even worse than single fathers. Deadbeat or not, one person of one gender simply isn't capable of providing what two people of two genders can. Even good married couples ca…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 06:13 AM
8

People never have, and never, EVER will have a stake in the "system". The stake has always been in future generations. everyone has a right to the democratic process. What about children and felons? Regardless, voting is not a right. We are not a democracy, and if you had any iota of knowledge about your government (assuming you're American) you would know that democracy was seen as a tyranny of the masses by the very founders. Democracy is one of the worst possible forms of government in existe…
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 12:25 AM
-2

It should go without saying that for black people and other racial minorities, the country is much better now than it was back then. We don't have any lynchings or internment camps today. He wasn't simply pointing out the idiocy of people's reasoning, hence my response.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 12:14 AM
-7

You realize that blacks are worse off by nearly any metric now compared to 1960, right? You realize that the increased wealth and technology was ALL created by men, right?
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 05:51 PM
3

As a note, though I largely agree with your post, there has been a massive amount of evolution in calculus since its invention. Our modern calculus would be basically unrecognizable to Newton or Leibniz.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 02:05 PM
15

Wait for male BC. Removing your ability to procreate at the age of 18 is stupid. (Vasectomies aren't always reversible). While it's most common in women, plenty of men have no desire for kids at your age and then later on do want them. Honestly there's too much fucking paranoia about women stealing your sperm. Not that it doesn't happen, but the chance is not so high that you should permanently sabotage your fertility because of it.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 01:57 PM
4

So, evolutionarily speaking, being alone with a strange man and insinuating sex isn't stupid? If anything it's the evolutionary response to their stupidity.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 08:35 AM
0

That would be a more consistent position, but I don't think abortion should even be legal. Even so, yes, women should in no way have sole authority on it. And as Mnemonic said, calling abortion a medical procedure is the epitome of doublespeak.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 04:58 AM
1

Even redpillers believe/recognize, for the most part, that an abortion is a medical procedure performed on a woman's body. Likewise, a vaginal birth or a C-section are medical procedures undergone by a woman. I doubt there's a strong majority who would argue that that abortion or lack thereof shouldn't be a woman's decision. That's clearly the correct result. I hold the exact contrary position.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 02:59 AM
3

It's not supposed to be said on the third date. In the original context it was to be said when you were considering commitment to a seemingly "good" girl that made you wait for sex.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:37 PM
2

The problem is that if, in the conversation, you imply that you view slutty behavior as a negative and will judge the girl for it then it's likely that she will lie or omit things because she doesn't want to be judged or viewed as a whore. So if you want a more honest answer (especially if you do view promiscuous behavior poorly) you have to be indirect.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 08:31 PM
8

You realize there's a "men's right" flair right?
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 01:00 AM
12

I've worked in environments with nearly all women. I loved it. As long as you maintain some neutrality in their petty squabbles you become like the king of your own harem. Women, naturally, all look to men as authority figures and you can set yourself up as the sole source of masculine power. The amount of influence you can wield is incredible. If you're socially savvy enough I wouldn't even worry about HR issues, because if one girl ever tried to pull shit you can just use the group of girls th…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 08:42 PM
16

I used to do the exact same thing (and still do sometimes). Here are my 3 pieces of advice. When out with your friends, go off on your own and pull girls. This will get you used to taking some initiative and making things happen for yourself. It's a crutch in some ways because you can always go back and regroup, but try to not rely on that too much. Find out social plans early and invite people (preferably chicks) to come with your group. This forces you to do some opening but also starts to bui…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 10:26 AM
-2

Yeah the 8% conviction rate of a crime generally committed by a known person suggests heavily that there is little to no evidence in the vast majority of cases, which suggests that there was no crime.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 03:05 PM
-5

The fact that the vast majority of rape claims are false suggests that doubt ought to be the standard position. You're just a white-knighting faggot who believes any bullshit some slut feeds you.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 05:58 AM
-4

Blackout drunk people do lots of shit they don't remember. On a number of occasions I've woken up with some girl and don't really remember fucking her except hazy bits. I've had hours of time spent at bars or parties that I have zero recollection of and the next day my friends tell me about what happened. Jumping to a conclusion of rape based on a drunken memory is absurd. I would bet that they were both drunk as shit and horny, mutually started fucking, and the girl didn't remember her willingl…
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 03:41 PM
8

Anything done by white men is bad. Anything done by another group is ok. This is the mindset.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 04:01 PM
11

And what's funny is that all the special snowflake women crop up talking about how they're totally not like that. Yeah. Right...
/r/TheRedPill26/03/14 03:43 PM
1

More the fact that the populace being armed makes revolt much more likely to be successful.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:59 PM
0

Aside from the example of slaves being liberated due to agricultural innovations, I don't see why an article on RoK is expected to be some full-on dissertation with extensive citations that conclusively proves whatever topic (however banal) they talk about. The point of an article like this isn't to convince people, but to proffer a new idea or viewpoint.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:32 AM
1

Like Fallujah? Additionally the US military would I'm sure have tons of splinters if it ever did come down to a civil war scenario.
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 02:19 AM
2

My response applied to your post as well.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 04:50 PM
1

Bigger guns didn't really matter for us or the Russians in Afghanistan
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 04:50 PM
2

You realize that empty rhetoric doesn't actually give substance right? And that just because you think you sound intelligent doesn't make it so?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 04:18 PM
1

Slaves (or future slaves) in America have guns. Lots of them.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 04:11 PM
2

Sixteen is probably my lower bound. Somewhere around 18 or 19 would be ideal.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 01:38 AM
0

I don't believe there is any indication that white Europeans ever lived in that fashion. That could be why we don't and they still do. Population differences also matter. I would also guess that these people are borderline retarded. Anyway, it's hardly fitting to idolize people living in huts who constantly war with each other over women. No doubt there are certain positives to their lifestyle that can be incorporated into ours, such as more exercise, but some sort of free-love commune idea has …
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 03:24 AM
1

Polyamory was not the standard as far as I know. Harems were. Regardless, societies that don't have single families are shit.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 06:12 PM
9

Follow Heartiste's 2/3 rule. You can do plenty of beta things in a relationship, and should, so long as she's doing more than you. Also, the things you do for her aside from giving her more attention should be masculine. For example I did some minor work on my girl's car, took out trash, etc. Basically follow traditional sex roles. The frame should not be you doing things to placate her, but you taking care of a woman who fills her roles. LTRs are a lot about finding the right balance. Relations…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 07:39 PM
11

This is exactly what should be said. That girl is toxic regardless if she's lying or telling the truth.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 01:52 AM
4

Maybe. That doesn't matter to feminists though.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 08:57 PM
0

It's a fault when 6s demand men with six figure incomes, six packs, and over six feet tall. It's a fault when 35 year old women destroy their families from thinking they can upgrade. Hypergamy in and of itself isn't bad, but irrational, unleashed hypergamy is.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 08:57 PM
22

Good for you man. Recognizing your faults is the first step to fixing them. It's not an easy process, but as long as you keep working on it and breaking out of your comfort zone you'll internalize a good mindset. Also keep in mind that pretty much all men have irrational guilts and fears, conscious or subconscious. Just keep using the logical side of your brain to quell and squash those things, and their affect on you will diminish.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 04:50 PM
50

I'm pretty sure that basic male sexual desire, aka "objectifying women", is the basis of their "men not seeing women as people" concept. It's nothing more than vilification of masculine sexuality and the degradation of feminine beauty.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 02:21 PM
1

Glad to have you.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 12:58 PM
2

I'm a Catholic, though not much of a practicing one in spite of a late conversion. One thing related to TRP I've noticed more and more over the years is that pretty much any time the Bible talks about women it is realistic. Pretty much all of the Biblical, particularly New Testament stuff, regarding how women should act and how they should be treated is pretty much exactly what you would do to keep hamsters, hypergamy, and all the other faults of women in check. Basically, regarding women, the B…
/r/TheRedPill07/03/14 12:50 PM
0

Absolutely a male role model is vital for men as well. As the focus was on women I didn't mention it, but many issues or criticisms of women also applies to men. The difference regarding this is that I think men have the greater capacity, disposition, and responsibility to make themselves strong. Also, I believe women function less well with role models. That is, a man will look up to a role model and try to imitate, a woman won't. A woman will need an active male figure setting limits and guidi…
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 03:47 AM
2

I think this is mostly accurate. I disagree that it is 100% possible for women to be as high achieving as men There are limitations on them because of how much their emotions impact their judgement. Granted many men have this same issue, but overcoming it is easier for men.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 10:00 PM
3

I'm aware men and women are different. My point isn't that women are broken men, it's that they're broken women. And furthermore, that the fix is male guidance.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 07:58 PM
10

Is this the same Marie Curie who was the daughter of a man who was a respected math and physics teacher who brought home lab equipment for her, and then the wife of a renowned male physicist with whom she worked on her famous Nobel prize research? Tell me more about her lack of male guidance in her development...
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 08:07 AM
0

Yeah bro let me just look for a minute and locate this peer-reviewed, published work by a phd researcher where it is conclusively stated that all women are mentally like children. Or you can just notice the mental immaturity, lack of personal responsibility, lack of agency, lack of individual thought, inability to take insult or criticism, naivete, and utter delusion about the world that is transparently obvious in every single girl that hasn't had a strong male influence in her life. Scientific…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 07:58 AM
5

No, women generally ARE children who are limited by their feels. Being governed by emotion and lacking responsibility is why they are children. A man can develop their strengths and rein in their weaknesses by giving them stability to hold on to. Without that they are like a ship with no anchor. Notice that the wife was only able to recognize her problems and address them because her rp husband guided her. Women aren't doomed to remain children, but left to their own devices they will. Even the …
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 03:53 AM
4

Here's the thing. If a girl will fuck you on the first date then she's fucked many men on the first date because she has limited impulse control and caves to immediate gratification. This also means that if there's a weak point in your relationship, such as distance or hardly seeing each other for a little while or whatever, then there's a much greater chance that she'll cheat. Plus, people that lack sufficient impulse control generally have other shitty habits that become problematic eventually…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:37 AM
5

I said the men adament about sex don't want ltrs. You've pretty much just said everything I did. The one thing I disagree with is that an actual good girl won't fuck the first night. Passing up on sex with a "good girl" is only passing up a chance to fuck a slut that maintains appearences. The only good tactical move is to always fuck a girl asap.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:24 AM
6

The amount of initial work and upkeep varies greatly based on the personality and upbringing of different girls. If you have decent raw material to work with it's not a massive amount of energy to keep her in line. Granted that is harder to find with most people being the offspring of single mothers or weak fathers. It's not worth the investment for women who are damaged from feminism and shitty parents. A woman's value aside from sex includes primarily bearing your children and maintaining a go…
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:17 AM
7

If your game is weaker than guys she's fucked before then there will be serious ltr issues just from that, so it's a moot point.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:09 AM
8

100% of women are like this without male guidance. Ideally that starts with their father. I say ruin themselves meaning that since they are so strongly influenced by their emotions they fall into negative patterns of thought and behavior that are reinforced by society, other women, and weak men. They are unable to rectify this on their own without either a proper upbringing or a strong man to steady the storm of their emotions.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 02:08 AM
0

I think there's a definite trend of people not believing the bullshit as much.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:28 PM
0

Amusement. It's actually endearing I think.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 05:27 PM
95

From what I've noticed the men that are adamant about not waiting for sex are not the men going for LTRs. So, for a girl, if she actually wants an LTR she should wait 2-5 dates to have sex. This will weed out a lot of guys that are not interested in an LTR. As for what you want to do, that depends entirely on what you want. Do you want an LTR with a quality girl? If so, wait a couple dates: assuming the girls appears to be LTR material. Do you want to spin plates and bang sluts? Don't wait. Now …
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 03:48 PM
2

I would say that it effectively means a belief in male superiority. The misconception is so prevalent that using it technically is problematic.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 02:53 PM
3

Haha I thought that might be the case. On topic though, I'm actually fine with women given lesser punishments for crimes and all that sort of shit because they are essentially mentally deficient. The issue is that they're also allowed to vote, go to college, divorce their husbands, and are touted as equals.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 02:51 PM
0

Seriously, they're treating this chick like she's a fucking child. Interestingly enough...http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1z64c0/treating_women_like_children/
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 02:45 PM
30

This is a point that is often missed by detractors or left unsaid. I think women are great. They're fun, enticing, exciting, etc etc. I enjoy their company and like to treat them well. But they're fucking children. And just like children they can be spoiled, selfish assholes or they can be well-behaved, cool people. Men leading their women, for me at least, means that when you have to ignore their antics, or tell them to shut the fuck up, or punish them via dread/ignoring/whatever, it's not just…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 12:14 PM
71

For all the accusations of misogyny thrown at TRP, I don't think most guys, even here, go far enough. Women are exactly like children in that without strong male leadership they will ruin themselves by being slaves to their emotions and short-sightedness. Their inability to take responsibility for themselves means that men need to be the ones directing, influencing, and manipulating their emotions into beneficial behaviors and pursuits. This means that the mindset RP men should have in their rel…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 11:43 AM
1

I think Vox says it best. He has a number of articles on the subject. The TL:DR is that smart women will pretty much use their intelligence to hamster and be a pain in the ass, and that the benefit of her intelligence is fairly minimal. I've found the same to be true, that smarter women in general tend to be less pleasing to be around and try to challenge you constantly.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 09:03 AM
1

Yeah there is a lot of that too.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 03:23 PM
3

He did do lots of coke. And tons of his songs are about fucking over women.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 07:43 AM
3

Yeah, it's worked for me. I get laid pretty consistently when single and have also had two LTR's with quality women. TRP can be somewhat justifiably compared to the self-improvement/game hamster. There is the risk of being a keyboard jockey who knows all the theory but can't apply it. Really, TRP is just a logical framework with which to actually understand sexual dynamics. Knowing what women are attracted to, or why they do what they do, or even the fact that they do a lot of horrible things on…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 03:24 PM
90

Because if you care, women totally might have sex with you
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 10:21 AM
12

slap/grab her ass: Like all-the-time. Playful. Hear her giggle and watch her sway her hips just that little bit more as she walks away afterwards I also hump my gf a lot of the time. Like as she's making food I'll just walk up behind her and start humping. Playfully. Maybe I'll whisper "Shhhh. It's not about sex it's about dominance." My current gf is the only one so far that humps me back. It's fun. Give her almost no attention at times If I'm in the middle of reading something or doing whateve…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 10:10 AM
7

My dad and brother are familiar with TRP in general, though not this sub in particular. My friends are fairly naturally red pill. I've shown them some stuff but they aren't interested enough to get too involved, though they do ok without heavy involvement. I've shown it to my LTR. She reads and enjoys Return of Kings.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 05:01 PM
1

You're arguing from a completely different standpoint. Obviously the top tier of men will always challenge themselves when they don't necessarily have to and rise to the top. The vast majority of men will achieve as little as possible. This is a simple fact of human nature. You can't inspire the ~80% of non-naturally alpha men to become alpha of their own accord. It just can't be done on a large scale. So the question arises: What do you do about this? Your suggestion is simply to let nature tak…
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 04:58 PM
5

Yeah it sucks for him that all a girl has to do is pop out a kid and get wifed to make a shitload of money. It also sucks for all the other men that have to pay alimony and child support based on "potential" earnings. It's slavery, basically.
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 05:53 AM
2

Unfortunately
/r/TheRedPill13/01/14 05:51 AM
8

Yeah, but also remember how feminized men have become. Low Testosterone levels and the overall betaness of men will stave off violence for a while. Eventually I think it will likely be clashes among race that initiate the violence long before downtrodden men do.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 11:30 PM
2

If I recall correctly, California has lifelong alimony, and it's likely that a hollywood divorce would have taken place there.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 11:25 PM
23

Yeah the amount of money rich men's wives get is absurd, though probably in line with what poorer men give proportionally. A big difference between McCartney and Frasier is that McCartney is probably still making bank off residual income even though he's not particularly active now. Frasier likely makes much less while not active.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 11:24 PM
5

Yep. Mainstream Christianity is, lamentably, just as ardently feminist and anti-truth as the rest of the country.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 09:06 PM
7

Seems like a toss up between a murder scandal and impoverishment, not having custody, and possible jail time from not being able to pay outrageous alimony/child support. But yeah, this should never even be a conversation.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 09:05 PM
10

And I have the feeling that if this sort of absurd legal situation bankrupts and imprisons more and more men that eventually you will see people pursuing that option more often.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:47 PM
16

As an actor that would essentially mean the end of his career. Though.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:46 PM
69

Seems like hiring a hitman would be cheaper than years of $1,320,000 a year in payment.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/14 08:35 PM
-1

This
/r/askTRP03/01/14 08:32 PM
2

Red pill women might be able to give a better answer on what you personally can do. Aside from that, if he's not working out or being active libido will lower from lower testosterone, or if he's jerking off too much. It could also be that fucking you has started to get boring after 5 months for whatever reason.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 10:32 PM
2

Alcohol and the desire for new pussy, mainly.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 10:26 PM
1

That really depends. First and foremost, you should start training yourself to be responding in the right ways. Giving into a girl's shit tests makes the behavior worse, and training a girl to not do them so much takes some time. That is, if you start passing the tests they may even increase at first since it's new behavior. But, after a couple weeks of consistency, they should decline noticeably. I would say spend a week or two getting used to successfully navigating these things. If her behavi…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 10:17 PM
1

Where men outnumber women 12 to 1. If that's what you want to find then good luck, but it would make sense to examine your motivations and the reality of finding that level of intelligence combined with youth, beauty, etc.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 03:01 PM
16

It appears to me that she did this as relationship bait. I've had that experience a few times where girls wanted more commitment than I was giving so they play at "breaking up" to try to extract commitment. Maybe there's an issue with you not being Chinese or something, but I don't have experience with non-white women. Personally I'd say a soft next is in order, though since you already fucked her 1) is an option too. I'd at least diminish attention somewhat. You can probably ride the tide of ea…
/r/askTRP30/12/13 02:05 PM
1

See http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2012/02/appeal-of-intelligent-women.html Edit: And also http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2013/08/apandopoeia-and-feisty-female.html The irony is that midwitted Gamma males not only value female intelligence, they fetishize it. Unfortunately, they simply cannot provide the intellectual dominance that intelligent women crave, as that can only be provided by those possessing both sufficiently high intelligence and socio-sexual dominance, most of whom are men w…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 12:38 PM
4

I think virginity is actually far underrated. For women, that is. unless you are just trying to pathetically force an inexperienced partner to conform to your sexuality only Nice shaming language, by the way.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 12:32 PM
2

It's an example of lunatic hamstering that this woman is a unicorn. I don't know if that's how OP meant it, but it is a good showcasing of a batshit crazy woman.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 12:05 PM
1

One thing to keep in mind is that being a "dickhead" is really what you OUGHT to do with the shit most women constantly pull. It seems like you're equating being a "dickhead" with being assertive and not putting up with bullshit.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 11:33 AM
1

Make her write out a shopping list before you go to the store. Take shopping list and lead her through getting it.
/r/askTRP30/12/13 10:24 AM
6

1) Don't ever pester a girl about her feelings. If she's being short with you, don't validate that with attention. 2) You shouldn't be so concerned with her minor displeasures, especially in a case like this where it was her fault to begin with. 3) You shouldn't be so concerned with "doing something wrong." That is, don't have this mindset that you need to promptly rectify every single thing that's not perfect. Do what you feel like doing, and if you think that perhaps you did do something you d…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 09:04 AM
2

So in the mind of a woman, a lie is excused if telling the truth would have consequences you don't like....which is the ONLY reason to ever fucking lie... Fucking truth right there.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 12:26 AM
2

Saw a really good response from one of the ROK guys: "How do you post pics/video on facebook?"
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 11:02 PM
10

The neg is such a minor aspect of pickup that it should be way down on your priority list. It's best usage is limited and it is easy to fuck up. Playful teasing is infinitely more useful and applicable than negging.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 05:36 PM
1

Emotion is a good thing. It seems like the problem is that you're too focused on it. I think working towards mastering that part of yourself is a better idea than giving up on it completely.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 05:17 PM
1

I'm curious though, in what sense do you mean "principles of equality?" Equality of outcome, opportunity, before the law, what?
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 07:36 AM
0

Haha I figured that to be the case. Nevertheless, I don't think the community as a whole will, or should, have one unifying dogmatic set of beliefs and aspirations.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/13 07:34 AM
2

1) The is/ought problem isn't really a problem. TRP is still fairly new, and this subreddit is only a part of the overall intellectual group. There are plenty of Christian TRP guys who DO advocate a moral approach to TRP concepts with the end goal in mind of not using people for your own ends and triumphing over darker instincts. Even many non-Christian guys advocate using TRP knowledge to form healthy, meaningful relationships. Regardless, since the whole ideology is fairly new (in the way we s…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 10:01 PM
3

Aside from further internalizing TRP thoughts and behaviors being vigilant about yourself is all you can do. One thing I do is every two weeks or so I try to look at my actions, interactions, and thought patterns in an objective manner. I realize with my current gf that sometimes I'm overly available, so I may make the conscious choice to distance myself or something for a day. Then I see a positive (or negative) reaction to what I did adjust as needed. But honestly, most of the time the situati…
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 12:48 PM
1

It shouldn't bug you, really. It can be taken in a lot of ways. Best response? "Mostly". Spin Hamster, Spin.
/r/TheRedPill13/12/13 08:41 AM
7

If I'm not mistaken, those frat guys actually tend to do better career-wise.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/13 09:15 PM
7

If he doesn't immediately (or right after fucking her ass) dump a bitch sitting there justifying cheating then he deserves everything he gets.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/13 03:22 PM
1

Yeah he's got some pretty solid stuff. His delivery could use some fine tuning but I wish I could find more of his stuff.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 09:00 PM
8

KT Tatara has some pretty good RP stuff about... Hypergamy How women are children and he's got a series entitled The Poon Sensei which is pretty good too.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/13 01:29 AM
2

I'd appreciate that. Would you mind if I x-posted it to /r/PurplePillDebate? Alright, it'll have to be tomorrow though. Yes, and male workers die more often than female workers. I'm failing to see how sex is the determinant of one, but not the other. Why do generalizations hurt my cause, but not yours? Because they're different fields and jobs. If male lawyers died on the job far more than female lawyers you'd have a point, but comparing a logger with a waitress isn't an apt comparison.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:47 AM
3

You've yet to prove that it's natural, unless you define natural in a really nebulous way. If it matters that much I can find a bunch of peer-reviewed articles that suggest it and build a case, but it's a mix of personal experience and some various research I've read. Which is exactly what you did. No, I didn't. Male doctors work more than female doctors. It's an apples to apples comparison. Is that agreement or uncertainty? Just general skepticism.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:37 AM
3

I asked why, not what. Natural differences between the sexes. To be the caretaker? This reads like a self-fulfilling prophecy: women have to be caretakers because they're being pressured into being caretakers because they have to be caretakers. Again, women are biologically programmed to do this. It's not some evil patriarchal scheme. I could say that men are the overwhelming number of deaths in the workplace, thus men can't do their jobs safely, thus women should replace men in the workforce. T…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:17 AM
4

Why do males work longer hours? Women in pretty much every career field work less hours. It's not specific to doctors. Why do females take more leave? To have kids, generally, although some just quit because they don't like the work. They also, in every career field, take more sick days. Does replacing all female students with their less qualified male counterparts really lead to more full-time doctors, or just swapping the sex of the part time ones? I'm inclined to doubt that the men are actual…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:02 AM
3

Who's to say that replacing all female med students with male students wouldn't lead to the same number of part-time/full-time doctors? Men on average work longer hours, see more patients, take less time off, and are more likely to work for a full career duration. Seems to me like a pretty good indicator that only having male doctors would solve the issue, or at least help. Especially given how competitive medical school is to get into, which is in large part because of how limited internships a…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:41 AM
1

Fair enough.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:38 AM
1

There are women, individual women, who are better than men, individual men, in absolutely every field that isn't predominantly a factor of physicality. I don't disagree. This is not an aberration, or a minority. It is, particularly at things that require a +2 sd or higher iq. I'm curious why you're even posting in TRP, since you clearly don't agree with many of the concepts. Why is that?
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:25 AM
2

but they aren't required for women to compete and they aren't being told that they have to go to college any more than men are. Let that last part sink in. Oh I'd say they're very much required for women to be even remotely competitive. What's being pushed for women and men are completely different things. Equity in treatment of men and women isn't exactly something I think is useful or worthwhile. Lack of wage increase has zero to do with immigration or the masses of women working. If you think…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:23 AM
2

Title 9, sexual harassment laws, schools/colleges set up to cater to women specifically, the constant policy and legal pushes liberals harp about when there aren't enough women CEOs or whatever, the neverending message that women NEED to go to college and have a career and maybe start a family eventually, etc. There is massive societal push for women to go the college/career route, effectively trying to force women into it. Not to mention that the mass of women working, combined with immigration…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:57 AM
2

First off, the amount of women that actively have careers in those fields is a fraction of the amount of women that get degrees in those fields, so it's a horrible misuse of resources to encourage women to work in a field they aren't suited for. See here for an example. Secondly, pushing women into such rigorous fields often results in making them genetic failures, which isn't conducive to long term prosperity.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:45 AM
5

And I'm sorry. While you may not like prefer socialism, welfare, abortion and birth control none of those are bad and are hardly decimating families. That is your opinion, a preference, and to claim it as indisputable fact is poor discourse etiquette at best. The fact that everywhere these policies, which, by the way, are straight out of the Marxist handbook (with the explicit purpose of destroying family), are implemented on a large scale have resulted in the very decimation of the role and pre…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:36 AM
6

Do you have anything backing that claim at all? Oh hell, their fucking periods affect their voting. 1) No, it hasn't. Despite this being the case. Really? An epidemic of single mothers, depressed economy, continued educational stagnation, dissolution of family, etc aren't symptoms? Looks like a decline of sorts to me. I'm going to preempt you by reminding you that men can raise children too. For some men, they're better at it than women. Do you seriously want the genius woman scientist who doesn…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:34 AM
1

My problem isn't with letting women have careers or try to be scientists or whatever. It's pushing them to do so and then forcing their inclusion. Encouragement for proper things is always good. For example, we should encourage our sons not to smoke meth and get facial tattoos.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:23 AM
3

Not in an official capacity but on a personal one yes.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 05:21 AM
0

One thing to keep in mind is that this guy is clearly older. If you're college aged you don't take girls to dinner. Just meet for drinks or some other random activity.
/r/askTRP30/09/13 04:09 AM
2

That sounds like a great plan. Best of luck with all that.
/r/askTRP30/09/13 04:00 AM
6

Legally, yes. I don't think that women need to be encouraged in such pursuits as college and careers though.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:56 AM
6

Plenty of women vote rationally all the time. Plenty of men vote irrationally. Most women do not. Most men do. Hence, barring women from voting is a net positive. Society can function just fine with just half society working, sure. But I'd prefer it to be the better half. And if it's 3/4 that's great too. Progress comes all the quicker. Progress isn't some inevitable advancement. It's resultant from a high level of civilization. A stable, advanced civilization will make far more progress than an…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:55 AM
10

Equality, for the purposes of this discussion, I would define as: the belief in the equal capabilities and rights for men and women, and the promotion of the manifestation of that belief. Women and men are different, hence, they cannot be "equal" in any real sense. Men will always and forever dominate STEM fields. Women will always and forever incline to "nurturing" fields, i.e. nursing, teaching, daycare, etc. There can never be, and should never be, "equality" in the workplace. Attempts to do …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:49 AM
3

I have a few very good Indian friends, so I'm familiar with some of these things already. My advice? 1) Go to India and find a bride yourself if possible. Most American Indian girls are like typical American sluts. Your value is infinitely higher in India than in America so you can more likely get the qualities you want in a girl. 2) The whole green card marriage thing is not near as prevalent as most people think. Certainly a concern, but not so huge that it's a dealbreaker. A girl's upbringing…
/r/askTRP30/09/13 03:40 AM
10

Equality is a myth and a detriment to a functioning society.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:12 AM
5

You do not believe women ought to vote Absolutely not. Women, being emotional, fear-based creatures will never vote in a rational manner. Whenever women are allowed to vote, freedom and individualism is replaced by socialism and collectivism. the principle of their opportunity to contribute to society in business or science has been of benefit to society? Their "contribution" has overwhelmingly been more of a burden than a boon. Additionally, in the long term women being active in the profession…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:11 AM
0

Marital rape is a fucking joke.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 01:49 AM
-7

Women never should have been equal in society. Feminists have been damaging and worse than useless for the entirety of their existence.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 01:19 AM
2

What a woman does or doesnt after you voluntarily ejaculated into her is completely irrelevant. It's not irrelevant if you have to become a wage slave for the next 18 years coupled with having no rights to your child when having that child is subject to the whims of a cum receptacle. The situation is fucked. I know it won't change in this fucking country, hence why I plan to get out.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:32 PM
0

Whining that life's not fair and trying to force some kind of whiny "fairness" on biology is stupid. It is exactly what feminists marxists are doing by requiring society to pay for their alpha bastards. That doesn't change the fact that there is unfairness, which is what you were doubting. Men should stop voting for socialists then. No argument there.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:29 PM
-1

Do you seriously not understand that this unfairness is a consequence of the fact that the entire pregnancy happens inside the female body? Do you seriously not understand that this unfairness is a consequence of the fact that the entire labor that finances child support comes from the male body? Why is it "unfair" that a man can not retroactively object to something he already consented to? Because women can. Duh.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 05:33 PM
0

And all that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the debate of post-conception rights and responsibilities. The simple fact is that now a woman who is pregnant has unilateral decision-making power over whether to have a baby. Given that men have no decision making power over the birth of the child, the only equitable thing would be to give men financial power.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 05:19 PM
-1

Feminine nature is not the same thing as having a vagina. Feminists ironically enough push women away from feminine nature and lead them to deriving worth from masculine achievements, while simultaneously boosting their self-esteem just because they have a vagina. It's nonsensical, but bitches be crazy.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 08:05 AM
0

Fish in a fucking barrel.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 07:58 AM
0

Compassion and nurturing is great and all, but as other commenters said strength is the main issue. A woman needs boundaries and expectations of her behavior. Granted, if that authority figure is a complete dick then they'll slut it up out of spite when they get a chance. However, compassion and nurturing without strength is a lost cause.
/r/askTRP29/09/13 07:57 AM
2

Compassionate and nurturing doesn't really work to affect female behavior. Be alpha, "game" her. You don't necessarily have to tell her things flat out, but you can talk about how worthless party sluts are etc in front of her. Just be alpha and make known the sort of female behavior that is acceptable and will garner appreciation. Depending on her personality and your relationship you may just be able to dole out some red pill straight up, but generally that doesn't work.
/r/askTRP27/09/13 05:56 PM
2

Spend a week collecting phone numbers from girls. Preferably on paper. At the end of the week, burn/delete every single one.
/r/askTRP26/09/13 06:13 AM
3

This. Agree and Amplify is the single best go-to response for any shit a girl gives you. Additionally, I'm a fan of a derisive laugh/snort sort of thing followed by changing the topic abruptly.
/r/askTRP25/09/13 08:27 PM
2

The fine lines and nuances are only learned through experience, really. Talking to a 7 at a cafe will be far, far different than approaching her at a bar, and the mood a girl is in will change how she reacts to various things. If you're doing the reading then also try watching some infield approaches to take note of the delivery and such. You can also do this in real life if you know people that are good with women or are observant when approaches happen. And, unlike WilliamShatnersEgo seems to …
/r/askTRP25/09/13 08:24 PM
0

Their advice can be perfectly valid in most cases.
/r/askTRP25/09/13 08:14 PM
3

Don't concern troll. Becoming red pill isn't some instant magical process. Anger, frustration, and negative emotions are part of the acceptance of reality. Of course that should be moved past, but TRP isn't the sole domain of men who have already done that. It's also here for those just taking the pill who WILL feel negative emotions and need to be able to vent and rant about it.
/r/askTRP25/09/13 02:26 PM
5

My issue in my eyes is that I want a woman I can be nice/sweet to that will return this in kind and it seems from what I've read here that this desire is something that is impossible to support long-term because it's something that women don't truly desire. The issue is that being nice and sweet to a woman will not cause her to be nice/sweet to you. She will be nice and sweet because of your dominance and attractiveness. That's the inherent problem many blue pill men have. You nice/sweet != her …
/r/askTRP25/09/13 02:24 PM
1

Could be either, depending on the situation. For the most part it's ultimate beta though.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 01:32 PM
0

If you can bring female friends with you then you can trigger preselection. Additionally, you might want to also think about getting a girl to sit down with you somewhat soon where you'll be above her so it's not cognizant while you build attraction. Furthermore, as was said, own your height. Flip the script. You're not short, they're tall, qualify them blah blah blah.
/r/askTRP24/09/13 02:54 AM
4

I was the best man at my friend's wedding. Parlayed that into fucking his cousin in my hotel room with her friend on the other bed right next to us while my other friend was banging the groom's coworker on a couch.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 02:46 AM
4

This is the original article: http://observer.com/2013/03/the-hebrew-hammer/?show=all There was a thread on the Rooshv forum about it: http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-21493.html
/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 02:43 AM
2

In lieu of the missing list you can check out heartiste's male sexual market value test and use that as a metric.
/r/askTRP22/09/13 03:42 AM
17

"Little spoons don't ask big questions."
/r/askTRP22/09/13 03:40 AM
1

See here Edit: So if you've read this, I'm not sure what you're asking exactly. If you want to hand holding or something just take her hand to lead her somewhere. It doesn't have to make a lot of sense. "Oh hey come check this out" take her hand. Or if you're both going somewhere hold out your arm for her to hold. For this I make it seem like a joking sort of overly formal thing, maybe adding "Milady" or something, depending. Touch her shoulder to emphasize a point you make. In a loud venue talk…
/r/askTRP22/09/13 03:27 AM
0

Some understand that they don't want a male feminist. The ones that do want that seem to think that there exists a male feminist guy that will also make them wet. They really don't seem to realize that the two are generally mutually exclusive and then just bitch about men in general
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 09:15 PM
1

Something else to keep in mind is that you can jump all over the place in conversation with girls, i.e. non-sequitors, abrupt shifts in topic that are vaguely related, jumping back to something from a few minutes ago, etc. I've started doing this more the past few months, and although to some degree it leads to fucking nonsensical conversations I've been getting positive reactions and girls have more fun with it.
/r/askTRP20/09/13 03:57 AM
0

Meh. My dad's uncle is a baker of sweets in Mexico and isn't feminine at all.
/r/askTRP20/09/13 03:50 AM
0

Read the sidebar on the TRP page.
/r/askTRP20/09/13 03:43 AM
0

All the "that's a real man" is logical stuff. It has no bearing whatsoever on what makes their pussy juices ebb and flow. Many women really believe that shit though. That's likely part of the increasing unhappiness with women; the dissonance arising from very firmly holding beliefs that are contrary to their nature.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 03:43 AM
10

If that passes bitches will then post their own pics online just to get their exes in trouble with the state. Terrible, terrible idea all around.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/13 01:29 AM
2

Rumi is actually a fantastic poet.
/r/TheRedPill29/08/13 01:59 AM
1

Relevant and relevant
/r/TheRedPill27/08/13 06:09 PM
-1

At the root, they're all essentially the same.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/13 05:30 PM
0

We got it, your a card-carrying Commie. Doubtlessly everyone has heard the same drivel about a juvenile philosophy coined by a lazy piece of shit moocher that never worked a day in his life. Nobody cares or wants to listen to you spout off rhetoric. This is not the place for it. We can sit here all day while I make strawmen of your positions and you do the same to mine, but we will never agree about anything and the "manosphere" or whatever will largely never accept communist bullshit, because i…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 08:54 PM
0

Ah yes, the feminist utopia of Sweden is such a good example. Regardless, the problem of Marxism is that equality is not a virtue, or even a real idea. It's merely some noble-sounding abstract that is utterly impossible in reality. You speak of bourgeois families being the target, but at the same time you talk about the ending of the "exploitation" of poor children working being ended. Of course, for this to happen you have to force both parents to work while the child becomes a ward of the stat…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 06:15 PM
1

From the Communist Manifesto: Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists. On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution. The bourgeois family will vanish as a m…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/13 01:12 AM
1

That's not really hamstering. It's actually right, albeit in a woman's words. A man would just say that women are so fucking emotional and devoid of logic that you just have to ignore them when they're retarded like that.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/13 04:24 AM
0

I've found the style of writing (which is fucking fantastic) to be present in pretty much every Heartiste post, so I'm fairly certain it's only one guy writing the blog.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 07:56 PM
5

The OP's boyfriend is in his 50s, which would naturally suggest that he's a bit more opinionated about things and I think it's fair to say that men his age are of the last generation that hasn't been tainted by extreme feminism. Yeah that's probably true. At the same time I'm dating this girl and I specifically tell her to wear dresses and she likes it. Thank god for the TRP fight against feminism. Still, I wonder how many people responding to the OP looked at her message, said to themselves "I …
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 05:53 PM
10

Feminism, like Marxism, is really about social outcasts and degenerates trying to make everyone become like them.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 05:39 PM
0

Of course.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 05:38 PM
12

Hard to say, really. My first thought was that the men are so submissive to women that the very thought have having preferences for how women act or dress is foreign to them.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 05:11 PM
10

Yeah that was hilarious. Everything OP said just about is downvoted. That's the thing about feminists of any stripe; they have zero logical consistency. If OP were instead pegging her bf they'd be all about it. However him preferring dresses and OP accommodating that is evil and abusive apparently.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 05:09 PM
0

would replying with a pic of your dick be a good idea? Only if you have a good-sized dick.
/r/askTRP22/08/13 04:53 PM
22

This post has to be filled with the stupidest, most feminized shit I've read in a while. "He likes you wearing dresses? OMG he's a controlling abusive warped sociopathic TRP-reading patriarchal oppressor!" I wish this was exaggeration, but unfortunately it's not... Brb booking a one-way ticket to Eastern Europe.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/13 04:50 PM
0

I live in Mississippi. Most people here don't read at all.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 07:38 PM
1

While true, I also think (going by many comments I've randomly noticed) that a lot of guys subbed here because we speak the uncomfortable truth. Both techniques are probably necessary to some degree. However, too much purple being accepted will start to degrade topics where really red pill shit will get downvoted by nominal TRP members. Ultimately, I think vigilant moderation is about the only thing that will keep that in check, so I'm hopeful.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/13 07:35 AM
0

It's not just saying it that really matters, from my understanding. The issue would be if you said something like "You know there are a lot of really bitter guys here, and it would help spread the TRP message if we tone down the woman bashing." It's one of those things that seems somewhat reasonable abstractly, but in practice amounts to feminist censorship. It's unproductive and another subtle shaming tactic that has no place here.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 11:03 PM
1

Yeah I think it's probably inevitable that there will be a decently sized segment of TRP that is more "purple pill" than just red. As long as it doesn't get too much momentum it hopefully won't be a major issue, but we'll see.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 10:59 PM
1

Cool, will do.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 04:44 PM
5

The thing is that it's not like way blue pill stuff. It's just that lingering hint of betatude and white-knightery so I really don't think it's trolling.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 04:35 PM
49

His best point, and the most dangerous one I think, is the fact that I see plenty of random blue pill shit get upvoted too frequently to just account for brigading.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/13 04:23 PM
6

It's not like subscribing to TRP means you aren't allowed to post anywhere else on reddit. You just don't follow np links.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/13 03:41 AM
4

On the sidebar of the TRP sub are a lot of good links. Heartiste, Roosh, and Vox, i.e. alphagameplan, are my personal favorites, but Heartiste and Roosh blogs, from start to finish, are what I would consider required reading for TRP.
/r/askTRP15/08/13 07:38 AM
6

I think the main divergence from the standard definition is that it's not unconditional and not exactly between equals. Edit: The sidebar actually has a pretty good explanation of the "standard" TRP view of love, which I think is pretty accurate. The posts are titled "Men in love" and "Women in love".
/r/TheRedPill13/08/13 08:40 AM
2

Short answer: Yes.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/13 08:34 AM
5

Troll.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/13 08:29 AM
-3

Yeah, this is true, but I think that the general lack of potential further compounds the lack of interest.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/13 02:24 AM
0

Unless you jerked off before fucking her there won't be any sperm in the precum. So, the most likely scenario is that she's not pregnant and is bullshitting about it, or some other guy knocked her up.
/r/askTRP10/08/13 06:01 AM
6

Opportunity is a complete non-issue as it's far easier for women to get into and advance in STEM careers, because affirmative action. However, I think the issue is primarily motive, though that issue is compounded by means. What I mean is, people in general are less likely to pursue things that are difficult for them. Since most women are in the middling IQ, STEM careers aren't exactly easy for them. This makes them less likely to pursue these. Additionally, and more so the issue, women are most…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/13 05:46 AM
54

I've never heard a 16-24 yo woman say shit like that, which should give you your answer right there.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 02:44 AM
1

Then enlighten me, because my view is that while I could be passive and be dominated by a woman, I would suffer a string of failed relationships until eventually I may chance to happen upon a mentally abnormal girl who can maintain attraction for a man she dominates. Or, I could extend my natural predilection for dominance into the realm of dating and exercise some control over my attraction to women and thereby be able to pick from the many beautiful women out there for pleasurable company.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 08:09 PM
1

Perhaps, but I prefer the route I'm taking.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 07:51 PM
1

It's not like I was completely absent dominance. I was my high school soccer team captain. I just wasn't dominant in my interactions with women. if relationships are never equal, and you somehow ended up in a relationship before "learning dominance", couldn't it be said that you would have been dominated by your woman? and attraction would have been maintained... Before I learned TRP my relationships were all very short-lived. Even if I started off dominant, a couple weeks or so of beta behavior…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 06:08 PM
0

if you consciously need to be aware of keeping up dominance, something must be wrong with you in the head. I've seen dozens of men who are usually pretty alpha get a serious girlfriend and get 'pussy-whipped.' Ideally a man wouldn't have to consciously maintain dominance, because he should just be dominant. However, many men here, myself included, had to learn dominance. Until it's fully ingrained it's still something that you need to consciously be aware of from time to time. wouldn't you consi…
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 05:54 PM
0

It's pretty standard for women to lie about or underplay their sexual history. Especially if she's now looking to settle down with a guy.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 05:47 PM
0

Be that as it may, it's that intelligence that brought us civilized life.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 05:46 PM
0

Ply her with alcohol and start recounting past exciting sexual encounters. It needs to be a fun sort of vibe going on. The question "what's the absolute craziest thing you've done" is always a good one for me. Just general shit like that. Alternatively, there's the fantastic drinking game "never have I ever." The application should be obvious.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 04:50 AM
2

Oh so many slut tells already. Anyway, I generally act extremely non-judgmental, to the point even of mocking her about being too pure if she doesn't say much, and steer the conversation towards sexual stuff, and from there wheedle out a general idea of her sexual history.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 03:09 AM
1

This is fucking truth. Women always do the same shit at any stage in life. The only thing that changes as they age is the particulars, and also their general cynicism and jadedness from being pumped and dumped.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:58 PM
10

Just shit you might normally do. Meet up with them at a football game, go to a park like rdg-pua said, invite them over to watch a movie, invite them to a party, just whatever really. I invited one girl over in high school to help me with a project. You just don't want that whole "date" dynamic going on.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:53 PM
0

I don't do things like this because they "work" in the sense of actually changing opinion. I do it because it's fun to see them flop around doing mental gymnastics, and then I just laugh at them.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:46 PM
34

It's hard to take women seriously when you understand just how utterly helpless and destitute they would be without men. If it were left to women to organize and build civilization we'd still be living in grass huts and foraging.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:44 PM
8

Don't take girls on real dates, first off. Secondly, read the sidebar. There is a wealth of information available to you. High school really doesn't matter all that much so you can just work on being social and interacting with girls in a fun, flirty way even without explicitly gaming them too much. Social interaction is a skill like any other, and it just takes practice. That being said, there are many other things you should be focusing on as well, such as fitness, school, etc. Really, just ta…
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:42 PM
4

I deactivated my facebook for about 6 months and nothing changed. It's not a problem for a lot of people.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:46 PM
0

Yeah simple distractions are a huge waste of time, and a huge source of unrealistic entitlement for women.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:40 PM
2

I will likely expatriate and get married overseas. The laws here suck, but I do want a family and all that eventually.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:34 PM
7

I figured it would be coming soon, and she's enjoyable company. Doesn't even own a cell phone or television.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:32 PM
-1

Yeah causality is extremely hard to determine, for various reasons. A statistical analysis would be very interesting, but still limited absent lifelong data. Even so, a lot could be gleaned from said analysis.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:39 AM
3

Prior number of sexual partners, if you can find it, would probably be a good metric for the men. Sexual partners for the girl, from the statistics I've seen, also has an enormous effect on marriage outcome. Overall, I think marriage is a pretty mixed bag, and the success of marriage will depend on the guy and girl involved, resultant from a host of factors.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 05:14 AM
7

Considering the rampant divorce rates, happiness while married isn't really all that good of a metric. Personally I like the idea of marriage, and plan to get married. Nevertheless, it's a risky proposition. I meant should do in the context of a TRP guy. A guy that can get women easily enough doesn't necessarily need to get married to be happy and fulfilled. I think marriage is, abstractly speaking, a good thing. However it's not a quick route to long term happiness for most men.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:57 AM
4

NAWALT rears its ugly head and that happens.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:35 AM
13

What men do doesn't correlate to what they should do. There's really no reason to marry aside from wanting a family. Also, the fact that men do marry doesn't mean that they ultimately like it. It's sort of just the thing to do for most men. Also keep in mind that rich men, being good providers, will have more women pressuring them into marriage.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:33 AM
10

Finally banged a half Croatian chick after 4 dates. As we were smoking she said "You always look so amused and cute." The power of the smirk.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/13 04:16 AM
0

Sure, if you want to spend all your time safeguarding the "honor" of your woman, and get all the other men to go along with that. You seem to be completely missing my point. I wouldn't even waste my time trying to keep a moderate-to-high N woman faithful. A low N woman is much less likely to cheat. You're trying to make it sound like some religious virgin girl from a traditional family who married an alpha sort of guy will immediately hop on 50 cocks the second she's out of sight. There is a sig…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/13 06:43 PM
0

It an be imposed so thoroughly that it become a dominant factor. Obviously all normal female urges apply, but absent extreme circumstances base urges can be constrained.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/13 03:42 PM
2

I was. Beforehand I had a bad view of fraternities but joined because my best friend was a year ahead of me and talked me into it. Best decision of my college career. I got extremely involved in campus life and was just constantly busy doing things that were social instead of video games. I learned a lot of TRP things and saw them in action. My best friends (6 years later) were from my fraternity. It was a very masculine sort of environment that helped to cut out all the beta, white knighting, p…
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 04:20 PM
0

This is true but things like heavily ingrained traditional values and/or religion can mitigate much of these impulses. Those sorts of things combing with being alpha make a cheating risk pretty low. Women ARE capable of virtue, although it's difficult because our culture glorifies everything bad about women.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/13 04:08 PM
1

Oh it's still an issue. It may be illegal, but it's not like you can instantly legislate away millennia of tradition. You see the same sort of thing in Mexico where it's tacitly known that pure Europeans are at the top of the social hierarchy. I don't think that had anything to do with this white knighting faggotry, but it's absurd to suggest that generally speaking the caste system is dead and gone.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 10:49 PM
2

Vox explains the concept well.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 06:09 PM
2

That'll work for a little while, but eventually that will overload the hamster.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 05:52 PM
-2

I don't go to that degree. I've seen assholes do that, and I know that it works, but most people consider me a pretty nice guy (not in the "nice guy" way, obviously).
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 04:57 PM
-2

I'm sad that it works, but c'est la vie.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 10:37 PM
-7

Oh such passive-aggressiveness. You know nothing about my personality or interactions with women.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 10:37 PM
-18

Fantastic rebuttal.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 03:20 PM
2

Oh yeah?
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 02:50 PM
2

I don't want women here. The odd one is ok, but heaven forbid they become a sizable part of TRP. Women ruin everything.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 02:43 PM
1

One of my good buddies from college is very chill and humble and occasionally self-deprecating. He was also the president of the Inter-fraternity council and routinely had a rotation of women actively pursuing him. He's also 6'3 and very good-looking. Ultimately, there are many ways to be alpha (in the Roissy sense) but the majority of the time humility and self-deprecation just makes guys look beta. I don't think it can be pulled off absent solid social skills/status and other apparent alpha qu…
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 02:37 PM
28

"How many feminists does it take to change a lightbulb? Trick question, feminists can't change anything. "How does a feminist change a lightbulb? She holds the bulb up to the socket and waits for the world to revolve around her.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/13 01:07 PM
1

I just want to know at what point is it rape if a girl is throwing herself at you but she has drank that night Unconsciousness.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 10:51 PM
-1

You already know the answer to this question.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 09:11 PM
3

Mathematics and Philosophy.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 07:12 PM
0

I just run light game on them and never escalate. I've worked in a lot of primarily female jobs and I just do the sort of shameless semi-flirting that one might do with a sociable older lady. I become the "darling" of the office, rarely get shit tested, and it's usually a pretty good time. I get a sort of platonic harem situation going on. The only hard parts are being able to deftly deflect the girls coming on to you (I basically just use women's playbook for that) and then maintaining sympathe…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 04:31 PM
-53

What? Grab the phone? An alpha doesn't give a shit what a girls doing, esp someone you just met. If shes on her fb, just after creating attraction just say "you seem cool we should go for a drink sometime whats your number," take it, and move fuck on. Have you ever actually met an alpha? Serious question. If an alpha is not getting attention from someone on their phone he will straight up just take it and hang up or whatever. Permitting women to facebook whore in your presence is the polar oppos…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 03:55 PM
1

That is good stuff, and it applies in every aspect of life, in addition to sexual strategy that TRP primarily focuses on.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 09:06 AM
1

The Romans also had a dissolution of family values and patriarchy, replaced by essentially hookup culture. Naturally this caused a variety of problems, and men weren't marrying for many of the same reasons as today. To counter this, the Romans instituted bachelor taxes and such to bring back marriage/family, and all attempts failed until their internal corruption was so great that they were to weak to resist foreign invaders.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 09:02 AM
-2

I agree with this part - he needs to bring some alpha, but it's gotta be adapted to the fact that there's a baby on the way. Yeah that does make the situation a bit more complicated. The current consensus on the MMSL forum (and AFAIK AK agrees) is that dread is a weapon of last resort to pull a marriage back from the brink of divorce Perhaps in the most extreme cases of dread. However awareness that he has options and could leave, even if he wouldn't, I think is a softer form of dread that isn't…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 12:21 AM
0

Interesting, I hadn't read about that. By invented, I more meant awareness of it.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 12:18 AM
0

I concede with the strictest definition of "it doesn't matter."
/r/TheRedPill25/07/13 12:17 AM
5

Yeah, the red pill movement hardly invented the idea of hamstering. I see a lot of red pill stuff in some of the great artists throughout history.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 07:32 PM
0

That may be the case with some of them, but I don't really follow most of the dedicated PUA stuff anymore. At the same time, I don't think they're completely wrong in that if you're in the top .0001% or so of fitness, game, looks, or money then that alone will suffice to get laid plenty. However, since most guys can't/won't achieve that then it's stupid to say as a general rule that looks don't matter.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 07:30 PM
0

Yeah, all those things matter in varying degrees to varying women. You can get chicks with just looks or just money or just power or just muscles or just game. Naturally, guys who are successful in one or more of these areas is going to be better off than a guy who's only successful in one or zero areas. When PUAs say "looks don't matter" what they mean is that looks aren't the end-all-be-all of getting girls. You can be ugly and still pull decent chicks. You can be poor and still pull decent gi…
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 07:10 PM
3

I don't know if he's personally red or blue, but it's apparent in his comedy that he understands many of the tenets of TRP. It may very well be that he didn't utilize and extrapolate from there, but he knew what the fuck was up about a lot of things.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 06:20 PM
7

I always considered him semi-red pill since although he comes from a beta viewpoint, he constantly exposes all the bullshit. I can't see how talking about (essentially) solipsism, hypergamy, and preselection is particularly blue pill.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 06:09 PM
12

It won't. The exact same shit already happened 2000 years ago with the Romans. Our society is female controlled and will be until the foundations are shattered. Until then, they'll keep using the stick, however futile it may be.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 06:06 PM
-1

If she's feeling vulnerable and loyalty testing, dread may not be his most effective strategy. True, but I don't think this is the issue. As he said he stopped being alpha, sex got boring, and she holds the power in the relationship. Kay uses the term 'beta' differently than it's often used here. More of the responsible partner type behaviors, rather than submissive mangina behaviors. He states that a balance of alpha and beta works best in a long term relationship. Keeping a stable job would be…
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 06:04 PM
-4

Nah it's not just about sex. It seems that he went too beta in the relationship and now she's getting to the point where the "spark" isn't there so she may leave him. If he wants to maintain his marriage, that "spark" needs to be brought back by many of the various game tactics. Dread is a foundational one that Athol Kay himself utilizes.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:59 PM
-6

And please stop using dread. What? Dread is an integral part of every relationship. Anyway, he said the sex has been shitty for the past 4 years, so it's clearly not a pregnancy-related issue. Athol Kay is good, but the problem is pretty clearly not too much beta which you seem to think. This has been going on longer than the pregnancy.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 04:36 PM
4

They get cats or a beta and desperately try to have kids. Either way, if she waited until the wall was near she's not in the best position. Ideally, a girl would get married in her ~early 20's so she has a husband who will still find her attractive even post wall and kids to give meaning to her life.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 02:04 PM
0

I also see ugly dudes with hot chicks. Looks matter, money matters, just not as much as game.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 01:59 PM
2

I know a ton of girls that have done it, but then again I'm from the midwest which is less feminist.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 01:57 PM
0

So last week I had a drinks date with a girl from okcupid. She was barely in the bangable range from her pics, and I get there and she's ~70lbs heavier: Secret internet fattie. I decided to have a couple drinks just to see what would happen. She rambled on about her long carousel ride while making really sad attempts at dhvs. She was 31, which is way older than I normally work with, so this has been my first time really seeing how pathetic older women can be. It's sad. I'm not even mad about the…
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:59 AM
1

Why does Roosh's stuff not interest you? Day Bang is a classic book for daytime pickup. Anyway, my transformation hasn't been momentous in a lot of ways. In middle school I was accidentally alpha as shit because I was athletic and part of the "cool" group. In high school I always had a lot of girls interested in me (though most of the time I didn't know it), but at the same time I was too beta and idealistic to make anything come of it. I had a few brief girlfriends who all soon dumped me. This …
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 05:48 AM
4

Yeah I've noticed this too, both when I'm picking up a girl and even just in general conversation. I just couch it in female-friendly terminology and the reaction is generally something like "I know! Why can't guys understand that."
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 04:43 AM
0

And here's another
/r/TheRedPill24/07/13 04:08 AM
-1

It's not baseless. Claiming you're smarter than the average does absolutely nothing to disprove the average. This is logic 101.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 03:47 AM
-1

TIL my existence, as well as that of several of my close friends and colleagues, rebuts a Harvard doctoral thesis. You're a fucking idiot. A small pool of data does not rebut a whole thesis about average IQ. Granted, if you can't recognize that, maybe you fit the bill too. He resigned (was not fired) Forced resignation. A self proclaimed scientist writing this is a joke. How is that a joke? Regardless, the liberal bias of academia and the media is hardly a controversial thing to point out. You h…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 03:27 AM
-1

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/10/jason-richwine-resigns-heritage-foundation_n_3254927.html and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satoshi_Kanazawa
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 02:27 AM
2

No, not all women cheat.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 02:14 AM
5

I get along better with my family now. I sort of mentor my brother, my dad already knew this stuff, and I refrain from being overly logical with my mom and sister, which used to cause issues.Your mother doesn't magically not become a woman just because she birthed you. Women all hamster. It's not a big deal, it's just how things are. Accept it and move on.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 02:01 AM
-1

Have you forgotten about the rash of conservatives lately who have been fired for mentioning actual statistics? Pretty much anything un-PC gets shit on or ignored by the media and academia.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 01:39 AM
5

It's true of looks, money, fame, athleticism, everything. There's no one thing that will secure a woman's love. I think that ultimately it's game, i.e. charisma, and alpha/dominance/power that is the only thing that will keep a woman attracted. Just look at Robert Pattinson. Got cheated on by a girl and he's rich, famous, good looking, and lusted over by women all over the planet. All that wasn't enough since he's a beta.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 01:01 AM
1

Wealth isn't a predominant factor either.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 12:45 AM
4

Bullshit. "Game" is alpha status. Looks are important, but women aren't men, and looks aren't the predominant factor in female attraction.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/13 12:41 AM
2

Or in this case, cows.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 05:48 PM
4

It's not much of a reach. All the clues point to weight gain. Additionally, women gaining weight after marriage is extremely common. It's probably more likely that she did gain weight than that she didn't. Given the context clues, the fact that many if not most women gain weight after marriage, and experience recognizing that her story fits the standard model of post-marital weight gain make the assumption that she gained weight very, very reasonable. I'd be surprised if she didn't.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 02:02 PM
0

Personally, I'd be concerned about her getting "accidentally" pregnant to try to lock you down.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 12:58 PM
19

No. he does not help by reminding me I look nothing like I did when we first met. Husband wouldn't say this if it was disfigurement. Also in there is I don't feel sexy.. and Married for 5 years..I've been with my husband for 8. Multiple things she said point to her having become fat. Being disfigured make zero sense as a reasonable assumption. I'd say that her having gained at least 30 lbs since they started dating is near guaranteed. I don't see her not having gained weight as being reasonably …
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 11:40 AM
0

I'd likely wife her. Many guys don't want to get married at all though.
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 11:16 AM
2

Oh damn
/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 01:33 AM
2

I hear that our water supply is also poisoned with estrogen from all the bitches on birth control, though I haven't verified that. But yeah, modern food is responsible for a ton of health issues and betaization of men is probably one of them.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 01:07 AM
1

Women are well aware of their inferiority, hence the drive that they have to dominate men. It's like if they can dominate a man then that makes them better by default. At the same time, they despise men that they can master precisely because they shouldn't be able to do so.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/13 01:04 AM
8

The only guys who are willing to wait that long for sex would be wanting to go the marriage/children route. Your problem is caused because you don't offer anything relevant to any guy. You're basically looking for a guy that's ok with waiting months for sex AND doesn't want marriage. That's a pretty niche market. Ultimately, your best bet would be to go after really beta guys that don't get much attention. A high quality man won't wait for sex unless he's pursuing marriage with a specific girl.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/13 09:04 PM
2

If you're in the normal range then bodybuilding shouldn't be a massively uphill challenge. What legal avenues do I have to increase this safely? Diet, exercise, more sleep and you should be good.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/13 08:58 PM
5

I am offering everything you would want and need from a woman/roomate in exchange for a place to live. It's actually the least delusional craigslist post I've seen in a while.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/13 06:08 PM
1

Nah. When they use betas for emotional hemorrhaging and money the same thing happens.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 11:29 PM
4

There's nothing intimidating about women, especially career women. It simply means that in sacrificing their femininity for a career, they can only lose any value they bring to a man.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 08:03 PM
9

The flip side to using it is seeing how it helps to explain why women grow to despise the betas that they use.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 05:46 PM
2

Oh I'm living in the deep South right now, so I'm well aware of how most church folk are. i also think a key reason people associate christianity with bluepill is that we always talk about redpill being unplugged and focusing on reality. when the only real uniform tenet of christianity is a god, which is unprovable by its nature, that doesn't mesh well with reality. You're correct. What most people don't seem to know is that the biblical observations on humanity and such are pretty straight red …
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 05:43 PM
3

On a side note, people act like Christianity is blue pill, when they dish out (at least in the Bible) so much real talk it's crazy. From that same chapter: Do not look for a wife. 28 But if you do marry, you have not sinned; and if a virgin marries, she has not sinned. But those who marry will face many troubles in this life, and I want to spare you this. But a married man is concerned about the affairs of this world—how he can please his wife
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 11:40 AM
2

That article is completely wrong from a Christian perspective, in every single thing he says. The sole reason for marriage Biblically is because you're too horny not to fuck. Just tell these idiots to read 1st Corinthians ch 7. It says things like: It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” 2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband. The wife does not have authority over her own bo…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/13 11:36 AM
1

More like annoyed at the ever expanding definition of rape in order to lay claim to victim status.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 04:49 PM
1

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/how-to-screw-with-a-cheating-whore/ Read this before you confront her. Also, don't confront her.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 02:21 PM
1

Good point regarding the Aztecs, although I don't exactly know the numbers they were rather callous to their slaves and captives, and totally dehumanized them. The normal estimate seems to be 20,000 per yer. Just to clarify, when I mention religion in terms of wars and deaths, it was more in respect to things like the Protestants vs. Catholics in relation to the monarchs of Europe starting wars and murdering their court-attendees based on fealty, or the invasion of Islam through Spain for exampl…
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 11:27 AM
-1

I think you'd be more comfortable discussing rape over here ---> jezebel.com
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 10:34 AM
1

Next are you going to tell me that if he was drunk when he fucked his wife that he got raped? God damn, feminist propaganda has completely ruined the whole word rape. His not liking it does not make it rape. If he had the slightest shred of resistance it wouldn't happen at all. I had a girl let me fuck her in the ass once. She didn't really want to do it, but I did, and though she didn't like it she did it for me. Apparently that would make me a rapist. Rape requires 1) Sexual penetration and 2)…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 05:06 PM
5

mostly due to religion being a contributing factor to do mass-murder over here. Actually, if you look at actual history you'll see that Christianity was a massive influence in reducing the death toll of wars. Also, if you count, say, the aztecs as native americans then their habitual genocides and mass slaughters were on a larger scale than any in europe. Even the American native americans were incredibly violent. Contra leftist anthropologists who celebrate the noble savage," the Harvard psycho…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:59 PM
1

I agree with that statement.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:46 PM
3

Absent outside aid, a country of women left completely on their own for 50 years would probably be completely dead in 20 years, with corpses rotting amidst their straw huts.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:30 PM
8

Taking a negative view of the book, Harvard University historian Oscar Handlin wrote in a review in The American Scholar: Hence the deranged quality of this fairy tale, in which the incidents are made to fit the legend, no matter how intractable the evidence of American history. It may be unfair to expose to critical scrutiny a work patched together from secondary sources, many used uncritically (Jennings, Williams), others ravaged for material torn out of context (Young, Pike). Any careful read…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:27 PM
2

If it fizzles out now you can also wait a couple months and send a restart text.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:20 PM
3

http://np.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1ig4b6/husbands_of_reddit_did_your_wife_change_after/cb474ay
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:14 PM
2

Is it ever okay to hit a woman? Of course, and for the same reasons I'd hit a man. Obviously I would limit it to a slap outside of extreme cases because women are weak and I'm not a bully. I'd love to slap the shit out of radical feminists until they beg for my patriarchal mercy. And they would deserve it.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 09:28 AM
2

This is a space for men. Men communicate in slang and at times vulgar and juvenile language. It's what we do. If you, and others like you, want to use more academic speech then go for it, but it won't change much. I don't personally use TRP terms when dealing with non-TRP people. I see TRP more as a specialized pursuit of truth and knowledge. Such endeavors ALWAYS end up using slang and lingo that people outside that academic community won't understand. Do you really think that if we use more "a…
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 09:23 AM
1

Well during that time I found game. After the 6 months I started getting laid semi-frequently so then the restlessness came back so I just stopped nofap. I still do it somewhat when I'm in a dry spell or spinning plates. The in-between times just made it a pain in the ass. In all honesty I intellectually realize I should just not do it, but I don't exert the willpower needed.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:24 AM
2

I did it for 6 months years ago. You get over the craziness but it definitely changes your attitudes even after the frenzy fades.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:02 AM
5

Yeah I agree that it doesn't require cultish dedication. Still, the effects of it are certainly real.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 04:01 AM
11

Any man with functional balls who's not masturbated for a week is well aware that it drives you fucking nuts. I don't understand all the anti-nofap stuff here.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:49 AM
5

Would bang.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:33 AM
2

That is correct. Women get abortions because they act like children and want to forego adult responsibility. Well, that and eugenics.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:20 AM
2

Oh we definitely have it better.
/r/TheRedPill17/07/13 03:06 AM
4

Personally I only have one account, but I also pretty much only follow this sub. I don't really care if people find my comments. I stand behind my beliefs and feel no reason to hide behind anonymity. I also don't begrudge people for wanting to maintain their privacy, for whatever reason.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 10:05 PM
2

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/2011/03/nawalt-and-you.html Vox Day sums up the generalization of women pretty well there. The inferiority of women idea has a lot to do with the fact that they are inferior to men in many, many areas. On the other hand, women are more valuable to the species. Heartiste explains it well.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 02:04 PM
1

While most of the acronyms are unnecessary, although good shorthand, a lot of them are quite useful. IOI, for example, is a group of various signs of female attraction. It's simply much easier to say "I saw IOIs" instead of explaining "Well she playfully made eye contact, played with her hair, and then accidentally brushed her tits against me." Every group utilizes acronyms and codewords, not only to shorten typing, but to standardize ideas. There's no intent to obfuscate or be exclusive. Hence …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:41 PM
2

I believe it because it matches my experience. Abstractly, I think that romantic love is predicated on attraction and that men and women are attracted to the feminine and masculine natures of their partners. Would you still love a woman if she gained 150lbs, stopped practicing hygeine, and was verbally abusive constantly? Do you think a woman who fell in love with a take charge sort of man would still love him if he got fat, quit his job, and constantly sought her approval?
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:20 PM
0

People can find love. It's different than the traditional idea though, in that there is no such thing as unconditional love. There are a lot of happily married red pill bloggers who advocate love and marriage. What they don't advocate is a delusional view of the two.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:11 PM
2

Women's smv being based more on looks than men's is pretty standard RPT.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:04 PM
1

ok
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 04:54 AM
0

Hell I'm 27 and have that same reaction with most girls.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 03:54 AM
25

TRP always applies. The fact is that women in that age range are, if they're not disgusting already, on the last legs of being fuckable. They know this, and act accordingly. Furthermore, women who have children are generally not as delusional. Status is always relative. Making 90k a year will impress a minimum wage cashier, while an heiress will think you're basically in poverty. A man in his late 30s is just about at the zenith of his attractiveness. A woman in her late 30's/early 40's is well …
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 03:15 AM
1

That is a deep philosophical debate, probably outside the confines of this thread. I'm of the opinion that morals are absolute, personally, because logically speaking if morals are relative then they don't exist.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:39 AM
1

This is a good point. On the other hand some guys have feelings that are based on lies. I just wanted to clarify that feels aren't necessarily enough to base everything on. In OP's case his feelings were good. It's also backed up by red pill theory.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 01:13 AM
0

And in the US less than 10 per 100,000 people have Hep B. That means that it's a negligible risk. Hep C also has similarly low risks. It's not like I advocated forgoing condoms. I specifically said that if you were worried then you should use condoms. I further suggested to use judgement in fucking even so. Apparently your medical degree didn't require reading comprehension. Using condoms and not fucking street hookers makes std's a statistical non-issue. P.S. In dealing with likelihoods, my mat…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 12:25 AM
-4

Feelings have nothing to do with red pill or not. If a guy "feels" like being a beta orbiter will get him the girl that doesn't make it red pill.
/r/TheRedPill16/07/13 12:17 AM
12

Pretty much every single culture ever has considered adultery to be immoral.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 11:11 PM
-1

You were true to yourself and your feelings, which for me is the only thing meant by "red pill". As far as I can tell, you didn't force yourself to accept the situation. Sounds hamsterish to me. Red pill doesn't care about feelings. It's simply truth.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 11:07 PM
1

RAW DOG FOR LYFE!!!!! Anyway, you'll notice that I recommend, if someone is worried about STDs, to wear a condom AND use judgement. Obviously not every druggie girl will tell you what she is, but an idea can be garnered and if you feel uneasy then don't fuck her. It's not a complicated idea. P.S. Working the medical field doesn't mean you know a god damn thing about HIV. The risk of getting HIV from vaginal intercourse is laughable.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 11:03 PM
1

Oh I wish I knew sooner too, though I did learn in my early 20's.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 09:27 PM
0

Yep, that's the reason I say it's basically zero. Men actually have much lower chances of contraction for all STDs in general compared to women and bottoms.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 09:26 PM
3

No problem. Roissy has good info for practically any situation.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 09:25 PM
4

A lot of hamstering, but still called women out on some shit and this Dudes bear an unfair percentage of the responsibility for flirting in this society, just as we bear an unfair percentage of the responsibility for looking pretty. Let's be sympathetic to one another, how about? was surprising. This may be the most sane article I've seen from there. Granted most of it is still completely insane, but a glimmer of rationality is still an improvement.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 06:11 PM
3

It's a fairly low risk. Even so, most common stds are curable. The risk of HIV is basically zero unless you're banging heroine users in the ass. Herpes is fairly common, but mostly asymptomatic in people. Same thing with hpv, though it's less common. I've never gotten an std and have raw dogged 20+ girls, mostly one night stands. I think if it's something you're concerned about then using condoms and exercising some basic judgement (i.e. don't bang a girl that mentions how much she loves cocaine…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 06:03 PM
1

Alcohol is a social lubricant, and few places have so many women available as bars. Don't get me wrong, I think day game will lead to better quality, and shouldn't be neglected. However, bars and clubs are a mainstay of pickup for a reason. Plus, some guys enjoy banging hot sluts that are worthless in ltrs.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 05:55 PM
7

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2009/10/20/what-to-do-when-a-girl-starts-crying-for-no-reason/
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 02:16 PM
2

I just want to point out that this approach is very similar to communism (if you compare money and pussy in a methaphor). Actually, the current situation where alphas basically pass around sluts is more like communism. Regardless, an actually free sexual market would destroy civilization in a few generations. It's completely unsustainable. Civilization relies on 2 things: Propagation of the citizens and excess wealth. Women suck at creating wealth. Probably 70% or so of women working are basical…
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 01:46 AM
2

Just go get drinks with her and reframe everything she may say about her boyfriend into insecurity and betaness, naturally in contrast with yourself. interested_in_stuff is right, you only have one guy to compete with.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 01:32 AM
2

I can't honestly think of a single girl I've ever met that doesn't occasionally go to a bar.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/13 01:28 AM
10

Both genders shit test, but women tend to do it more. Male shit testing isn't really discussed much because TRP tends to focus on relationships between genders, as opposed to male interaction. Aside from ignoring the wife and such, you can also demonstrate via words and actions that the husband is on your level. She's throwing out IOI's to you because she sees you as more alpha than her husband. If he doesn't increase his own rank, you can basically "wing" for him to bring him more up to your le…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 05:36 PM
1

1) About 8 years now. 2) Found David D from a google search. 3) Roissy. 4) For the first 5 years or so I just learned game and banged women with no real long term goals or plans. Lately I've been working on self-improvement and thinking more long term. What will "Post-Redpill" discourse focus on in 24 months, 60 months? I think that as the manosphere gets more national attention we'll be seeing backlash and attempts to discredit us and force us back into beta provider roles. In response to, or a…
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 02:36 PM
4

Holy manjaw, Batman.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/13 01:00 AM
5

As far as I know it more or less means that she's just rejecting you. I don't know if it's a test that can be passed, but maybe someone can elucidate.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 11:56 PM
8

Now, she said, she and her best friend had changed their romantic goals, from finding boyfriends to finding “hookup buddies,” which she described as “a guy that we don’t actually really like his personality, but we think is really attractive and hot and good in bed.” Best line in there.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 04:23 PM
1

That guy is a beta faggot. Anyway, well done on responding to her shit. There is a world of experiences and knowledge awaiting you.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 01:12 AM
14

I'm stealing the "Atlantis" line. That's good shit. But yeah, welcome to reality. Your game, at least the words, seems pretty solid already.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 01:10 AM
6

She's attractive though. I've never understood that. I don't find her attractive at all.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 05:36 PM
1

Welcome. NAWALT and long term use of game were also things I had issues with in the past, so good to see you're correcting that.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 05:07 PM
3

Studies are pretty inconclusive, actually. The most likely case is that white and black penis lengths are roughly the same on average.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 05:04 PM
1

I agree. I just think it's worse for women.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 04:51 PM
2

Well the 1 in 57 billion was a gross exaggeration. It's still not very likely.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 02:45 PM
3

Nice, more good stuff. From a historical perspective I'd also add The Decline of the West by Oswald Spengler. It's a pretty critical examination of the rise and fall of civilizations. What makes it really good is that it evaluates the world view of cultures. I found that the various works I've reread after reading Spengler made more sense in that they were more contextualized.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 02:22 PM
5

Good selections there. I know there are a whole bunch of other great books out there that I did not mention, so what suggestions do you guys have? The Bible, and various other theological books. --There's a lot of wisdom and food for thought, even for the atheists. The Art of War by Sun Tzu -- For obvious reasons The Prince by Machiavelli -- Pretty keen insights on human nature and how to manipulate it.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 01:06 PM
1

It's not about women and men, it's about good people and bad people. In a way you're right. However, it's important to keep in mind that men and women are bad or good in very different ways. At the same time, Western society encourages women to be bad. Therefore, many women are bad.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 12:54 PM
8

Actually, like 20% of women have herpes. It's extremely common.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 12:48 PM
14

Since that happened to me (and I'm actually grateful it did), I like to think of banging chicks with bfs as just "paying it forward."
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 12:31 PM
2

shit test - passed
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 12:30 PM
7

Actually, I got into TRP (in a general sense) specifically because I found out just after we had broken up that a gf had been cheating on me. I think for a LOT of guys here something similar was a catalyst.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 12:21 PM
19

Only 23? So many dicks by that time. I don't buy her story. At all. Most women, when caught cheating ALWAYS turn it around on you. She wasn't caught cheating. He had no proof, and if she wanted to stay with the guy or save her reputation she'd naturally just try to make a plausible story and play naive. this may actually be a naive girl who doesn't understand how to behave. She works at a bar and was going to smoke weed with musicians. This is no innocent, inexperienced girl. Those things togeth…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 04:20 AM
5

There's a glossary on the sidebar, but this isn't in it. To "Next" a girl just means to be done with her. As in, completely end any investment and pursuit of her. It should be considered permanent. If she happens to come crawling back, then as Desi said, "Bring the movies". "Next" is more of a pop culture term that comes from an old dating show). At any point during a date the chick could just say "next" and the date is immediately over and the next suitor comes out.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/13 01:10 AM
12

This is an ok plan. If it works then you don't have to worry about a possibly messy divorce, if not then you've spent 6 months on self-improvement which would pay dividends in the dating game.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 06:27 PM
4

As far as Machiavellianism goes, it's really just practice. Aside from gaming girls, there are tons of opportunities to practice. It doesn't have to be for anything important, or even beneficial to you. Basically, look for instances where other people are making a choice or acting a certain way, and try to change it to whatever you want. Start getting people to perform simple tasks for you via manipulation. People generally act in very predictable ways. Figure out the way a few people act, and m…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/13 05:16 AM
0

Great minds and all.
/r/RedPillWomen11/07/13 03:05 AM
5

She's definitely cheating, and probably has a number of times in the past. A druggie slut with slutty friends and family is 100% cheating on you. No doubt about it.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 08:03 PM
8

My recommendation to fuck this girl, and you definitely still can, is to pull back a bit, i.e. ignore in hallways, run jealousy game on her next time you see her out (HUGE bonus points if it's with one of her sorority sisters), and then whisk her away when she throws herself at you. Afterwards kick her out of your place.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 07:11 PM
7

"Yep" would also work.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 07:04 PM
1

So, do you think it's possible for her to be telling the truth, or is there a reason why dudes are suspicious of her? It's likely that she believes that she's telling the truth, because rationalization hamster. However, given this limited information, the fact that a guy already dumped her for the exact things you suspect make me figure that your suspicions are probably right. Without more info you can't really say for sure though.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 05:39 PM
10

If you took her virginity and aren't a giant beta this risk of her cheating is extremely low. all the stuff I read on this sub makes me feel like she is going to at some point no matter what. Nah man. If she had already had 20 dicks then it would be guaranteed, but generally taking a girl's virginity bonds them to you very well. Since she was 20 or so before having sex and isn't an attention whore, I'd guess that she actually has impulse control and doesn't validate herself through male attentio…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 05:37 PM
0

The glaring flaw in Vox's socio-sexual hierarchy, where sigma comes from, is that there is no in between from omega to sigma. I find that there are a lot of guys who are in between. People generally confuse the whole idea of sigma all the time, but Vox explains it well here.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 01:18 PM
1

Sweet, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 12:53 PM
3

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-10316-post-157854.html#pid157854 New study: Dick fits perfectly into pussy. Some correlation possible.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:48 AM
8

Her logic is atrocious, but she is acting in self interest.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 03:46 AM
9

Study, observe, implement.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 02:04 AM
11

Woah. You should tell her you snooped and why and what you found. It could be that she is just an asshole, but this sounds more like her boss is manipulating her and putting her in an awful position. Let her know that you support her and will help her deal with them. This is a sexual harassment lawsuit waiting to happen. Not that this is an original wish, but I wish I could punch people through the internet.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 12:12 AM
28

Holy shit. OP of that is retarded as fuck. Apparently his gf also went to Vegas with her boss a couple weeks prior. Basically his girl was going to get gangbanged by her boss. She went to Vegas with him and his gf about 2 weeks prior. She says nothing happens and I believed her. LOLOLOZZLOLZZ What's really sickening is the faggotry in the comments. Instead of recognizing that sluts are gonna be sluts, they somehow turn it into her being a victim. Holy shit I am terrified for your girlfriend. It …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 12:10 AM
3

As a generalization it's not dramatic at all.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 10:41 PM
2

That's fucking hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 10:32 PM
2

Nothing is too controversial here. It's something that happens in silence though for the most part. The reason it's not discussed more, imo, is that generally TRP guys have a basic moral code or honor that lends them to not wanting to force even a beta to raise a child that isn't his. Additionally, we're not animals. The desire to procreate is largely overcome by the massively negative consequences associated with it. I think it mostly amounts to most guys not even wanting kids, and those that d…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 08:09 PM
1

Wow. You really dont like women much. After reading this subreddit, I'm not surprised. There are plenty of women I like. Feminists and fat apologists are not among them. And any upper level biology, anthropology, psychology class during reproduction. While women may primarily be the choosers, the idea that they are the sole ones flies in the face of observable reality. Have you never seen a woman pursue a man?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:51 AM
1

A cultural construct being formed from a biological basis means that there is a biological basis. Obviously.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:38 AM
2

Women are the choosers in biology. Where is your reasoning or evidence for that? Just because women can be forced, does not mean its what is best for the offspring which is what evolutionary biology is about. Women have often been forced to be mens' wives, and in some Amazonian cultures this continues, so clearly that gives lie to the idea that women are the choosers. And an alpha male would procreate with any and all willing females. False. An alpha male is generally more discriminant in procre…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:37 AM
2

No, it said that it being a cultural construct was another possible explanation. Nevertheless, the fact that every single culture that has ever been found has had some form of incest taboo logically implies that it's instinctual, i.e. biological in nature. It's delusional to assert that it's purely a constructed moral issue in the absence of actual scientific proof.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:28 AM
2

Do you know what hair is made of? Its dead cells, melanin, and keratin. Its not a living aspect like an arm. Long hair is notoriously hard to maintain due to this fact. After a certain point natural sebum cannot maintain hair like you believe. Thanks for the 7th grade science lesson. That still doesn't change the fact that hair is an indicator of health. Though in biological terms a wider hip means that the woman's hips have rotated outward. Again, .7 whr is universal and standard. Only a few th…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:22 AM
2

Good point, but it's worth keeping in mind that many of these "attractive" qualities were social and economic in nature. Erection inducing qualities are largely standard and objective though.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:14 AM
1

An explanation for the taboo is that it is due to an instinctual, inborn aversion that would lower the adverse genetic effects of inbreeding such as a higher incidence of congenital birth defects (see article Inbreeding depression). Since the rise of modern genetics, belief in this theory has grown.[11][12][13][14] Are you retarded? One line of explanation sees the incest taboo as a cultural implementation of a biologically evolved preference for sexual partners with whom one is unlikely to shar…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 05:03 AM
1

It's also a big part of dozens of other philosophies. I agree with that aspect of Marxism. That still doesn't make Marxism red pill as a whole.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:55 AM
2

A fat woman would only get a husband if she had a rich father. It's not like men were fighting over marrying fat bitches because they might be wealthy. Regardless, it's never been a beauty standard or male preference, which is the topic at hand.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:53 AM
1

What science is this?
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:49 AM
3

Obese women were never preferred. The whole idea that fat women have ever been beautiful is a complete myth. The .7 waist to hip ratio has always and forever been consistent with ideal beauty. Obese women are physically incapable of that ratio.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:46 AM
1

Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:42 AM
1

This is just so fucking completely wrong it's absurd. Is this TRP or Jizzabel? Jesus Christ. Long hair means nothing. False. Good looking hair signifies health. Long good looking hair signifies years of health. The idea that the majority of men finding long hair more attractive is basic fact. Wide hips does not indicate fertility, it just indicates the hips of a woman can possibly birth children. Depending on how wide you're talking about. Wider than men's hips proportionally are is the key fact…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:35 AM
1

That sounds to me much more like the libertarian ideals of property rights and self-ownership than Marxism.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 04:00 AM
1

What exactly do you mean by a Redpill man wishes to own his means of production. He does not support woman controlling him through child support and alimony.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 03:51 AM
5

I'm not sure if that's even a shit test. That usually means "you're a beta and I'm not attracted to you, but I want you to keep giving me attention and validating me."
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 02:14 AM
2

And the implication that America is even remotely capitalist is absurd. We've essentially had corporatism that is much more akin to fascist economic policy than anything else. While the OP is correct about many of the problems this corporatist system has caused, let's not forget that Marxism and all of its ideological offshoots are a root cause of the social decimation that led this to happen. A goal of Marxism is to utterly destroy the fabric of society and civilization, via the destruction of …
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 01:52 AM
3

Relevant
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 01:29 AM
1

Anyway, when she doesn't have guys to cook for her she eats fucking bread and nutella, and then passed out in the plane one day because she wasn't eating anything nutritious. How stupid can you be not to realize this is bad for you? Haha that's hilarious and sad at the same time. It's almost unfathomable how stupid these girls can be. I mean, I can see women not cooking for men because feminism, but damn. I guess that makes sense though since the byproduct (or goal) of feminism is to make women …
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 01:07 AM
3

Welcome. There's lots of good material to read up on and learn.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/13 01:02 AM
2

This is wrong. The guy who created the sigma classification, and who self-identifies as sigma, i.e. Vox Day, is married. MGTOW has absolutely zero effect on a man's place in the hierarchy.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 11:21 PM
0

I don't think anyone here is under the impression or asserting that women are incapable of cooking. I think everyone here would love it if a woman in their life cooked them hearty meals without reservation. What everyone's saying is that the vast majority of young women, at least in the US, have put forth basically zero effort into learning how to cook either for themselves or others. In other words, it should be (obviously) understood that when we say "women can't cook" we mean that "most women…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 10:57 PM
4

I'd say that if a woman can't cook she's unfit to be a wife, mother, or ltr. A woman who can't (or won't) cook just means that she's lazy, unhealthy, and selfish.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 09:15 PM
0

They're pretty rare. However, my buddy is getting married to a girl who genuinely loves to cook and is great at it. Hell, I would hang out with them back in college when they first started dating and she'd be making 3-5 course meals just about every day.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 09:08 PM
6

I can count on one hand the number of women I've ever met under 30 that are good cooks. A similar number have tried to cook for me but just weren't any good at it. The vast majority just don't cook. Comparing mothers and grandmothers to young American women is apples and oranges. The vast, vast majority of women that we TRP guys will encounter will be absolute shit at cooking, if they even try.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/13 05:11 PM
3

Feminism and all it's supporters are your enemy. Never forget. There are no disagreements, no minor clashes of ideologies, there is no room for debate, they're trying to destroy you regardless of what they say or what you think they believe in. This. Feminism is truly a vile, evil ideology masquerading as righteous.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/13 04:34 PM
0

I think you're still refusing to grasp pirateundies' point regarding shame and how it is not actually a useful emotion. No, I understand it perfectly. Where you fail to understand my point is this. The point here is that the negative consequences involved with shame often PREVENT individuals from actually correcting what causes them to feel ashamed. Oh really? And even in the case that most of the fatties of the world just have shit "self-esteem," which again, they should, then at the very least…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 12:44 AM
2

Yeah that is a more accurate representation of their motives. However in practice they still never push for anything other than the responsibilities of men.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 12:22 AM
1

Yeah his other one delves more deeply into the world at large from a red pill perspective. Personally I find it better than his game site, though that has plenty of good stuff too.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/13 12:21 AM
11

And the problem with Tradcons is that they think if men just keep doing what their grandfathers did then everything will be peachy. They fail to realize that our grandfathers' time is dead and gone, and that it is those very same idealistic notions that feminist society uses to keep men as beasts of burden. I agree that the old patriarchal gender roles are ideal, it's just that, like feminists, tradcons want to keep all the responsibilities of men and none of the benefits.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 07:47 PM
4

http://alphagameplan.blogspot.com/ is his game-related site and is actually on the sidebar. Vox is one of my favorites though. Also in there should be rooshv.com
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 08:58 PM
20

And because they have to, since only ~30% of men are 6ft and over. This is the equivalent of saying 70% of women 'don't stand a chance' if they have smaller than D cups.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 08:54 PM
65

What this fails to take into account is that 100% of women don't actually know what they want.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/13 04:30 PM
0

Simplified: "I made a mistake" vs "I am a mistake". No. The difference is "I acted wrongly" vs "I acted wrongly, and I'm less good of a person because of it." People should feel that acting wrongly lessens their value. You seem to be extrapolating that to mean that acting wrongly forever makes a person worthless. The article then goes on to discuss how pervasive shame can have negative effects on one's ability to form realistic bonds with others. And, for good measure, here's a research article …
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 07:32 PM
2

I disagree. You also don't understand what the word "shame" means, and fixing that solves our talking past each other. a painful emotion caused by consciousness of guilt, shortcoming, or impropriety You go on to say You got that backwards. A big part of the reason men are feminized is because of constant shaming from society. My main issue is that we stopped shaming women and manginas. Had we kept up with the shame then civilized masculinity and femininity wouldn't be getting shamed now. We will…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 05:35 PM
1

Toxic how? Bad behavior should have negative consequences. The issue isn't shaming, it's that men are too feminized and react far too much to shaming.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 01:31 PM
-3

The Bible is straight up the single most red pill book out there. Seriously.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 06:26 AM
6

No problem, and welcome to TRP.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 06:10 AM
9

Shame is a wonderful motivator. We should bring it back.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 06:08 AM
8

I think the "sudden shift" is that there comes a time when you commit to the red pill. It's not meant to imply that all of a sudden you become alpha. All it means is that a man has recognized the lies for what they are and starts to pursue the truth. The quick progress aspect is that once you start learning RPT there's a deluge of revelation. Day to day, though I don't pay all that much attention anymore, there can be hundreds of blue pill lies or blue pill examples you can see. The progress the…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 06:02 AM
4

Well, at least you approached. Still better than most guys. This. As my father is fond of quoting, "A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step."
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 04:15 AM
-1

Here is where I start to have reservations, I can logically understand how acting "Alpha" gets you women, it makes sense biologically. However, the type of women this gets you are what I would consider sub-par at best. I don't want to have to use game to get a woman, I would like to be monogamous if possible. If the only way to pick up chicks is to reinforce their attraction to macho assholes then I don't want to pick up chicks. You have a very, very narrow scope of what game/TRP is about. This …
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 02:15 AM
2

I felt angry, sick, and worst of all... curious. Haha, yeah I know what you mean. Now I have to be extra conscious around my friends' girls because most of the time I talk to a girl I just naturally fall into the mode of flirtation.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 01:35 AM
2

That's exactly my plan as well.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 12:10 AM
0

Alternatively you can just record sound. That should be enough and most of the time it's not wiretapping if you know about it.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 08:27 PM
1

Oh I meant the mother of 4. I just thought it would be hilarious if skinny single-mother-of-four-who-is-also-in-a-relationship > girlfriend who got fat.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:59 PM
3

Yeah no problem. A lot of what I've read here so far seems to be the sort of thing I attribute to "Lucky Bastards" - the guys I assume find dumb women who will put up with it. I never knew it was an actual game plan until I came here a few days ago. Yeah it's definitely a learnable game plan. It's also not something that just works on dumb women. Personally I've used it to date a number of women with post-graduate degrees. I think I need to reevaluate a lot of what I've witnessed in the past Aft…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:57 PM
0

Is she fat?
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:46 PM
17

Congrats man. I'm sure you'll see plenty of other successes. Likewise you'll have a ton of failures, but those are just opportunities to learn.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 05:51 PM
2

Nah you're waking up just in time, actually. Since I was the same way in having an idealized version of love and all that, my only advice would be to keep in mind that the nature of women applies to ALL women. There is no special snowflake that you can be a raging beta with who will not grow to resent you. Other than that, welcome to TRP and good luck.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 05:48 PM
4

what do I need to know? There's a shitload of information. Heartiste, Roosh and Vox Day are my personal favorites, but I'd just recommend reading the shit out of game/red pill blogs. A lot of red pill stuff will not make sense to you, or you may not believe it, but when you learn more and more you see how obvious it's been throughout your life and how it all actually fits together and explains the failures you've had. Welcome to TRP.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 05:39 PM
5

That's unfortunate but a smart move. It sometimes sucks to see "alpha fucks beta bucks" in practice when it comes to your friends.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 05:33 PM
1

Hundreds of thousands of deluded blue-pillers beg to differ. If you would claim that you're better than them, first you'll have to explain where they went wrong. The same way they're wrong about so many other things regarding women. They ask women and believe them. So if she doesn't put out, you'd be willing and able to get sex elsewhere? Would this be hidden or overt? Hidden. Overtly saying that you'll cheat on her if she doesn't put out is borderline retarded. And it's not like you have to act…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 07:54 AM
1

Men have a larger standard deviation in intelligence though. As far as men submitting, all this creates is a larger alpha beta distinction where it's ALPHA > women > BETA.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 07:47 AM
42

After I learned game I was bitter and on a rampage. I ended up fucking 2 engaged girls, a married girl, and a few girls with boyfriends. All had relationships with dudes that were beta as fuck. My experience has been that there's basically no notch easier than a girl with a beta male, and that it's extremely common that they will have sporadic affairs.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 07:17 AM
1

The problem is, women are very good at hiding this side of themselves if they sense you'll judge them for being sexually promiscuous. I mean, how are you going to tell if she's had lots of men? Ask her? And expect an honest answer? Yeah, right. You act non-judgmental and even mock her if she claims to be chaste. Obviously you don't come right out with a list of what you're looking for. Besides, since most guys would want to bang them even if they aren't marriage-worthy, it would be counter-produ…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 07:09 AM
36

Mine's a longer story, but it happened months ago so not really FR material. So I was in Pensacola visiting my buddy who's a Navy pilot. We go out for my birthday to this bar where there's ladies night. Women were everywhere. The rest of the group wanted to eat and talk amongst themselves so I just went off on my own. Chatted up girls, got free drinks, made out with a couple girls but got cockblocked. Then I see a 7 (which in Pensacola is about as good as it gets) smoking on the patio. I chat he…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:43 AM
3

I disagree with some of your premises. 3)a woman may have sex with a man if she feels like it in the moment, regardless of any existing husband or boyfriend. Women also bond more strongly than men, especially to an alpha male. I keep seeing the idea tossed around that a woman will just randomly fuck dudes who game them at the drop of a hat. It's a gross exaggeration. Sluts are the worst cases, but a girl with a very low partner count won't fuck around on her husband unless he fails at maintainin…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 06:18 AM
15

Yeah it's pretty much straight red pill. And it's such a realistic example that it shows the importance of maintaining your identity as a man.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 05:12 AM
0

No, I just go for short, petite girls. I also prefer brunettes and redheads.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 09:46 PM
0

Yeah man, I'm a neckbeard virgin who secretly jerks off to Upton's cellulite and mustache. Anyway, I could see why some guys like her, but she's pretty much the opposite of girls I go for. I can't look at her without seeing this and this.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 09:01 PM
7

Like sticky said, there is far more than advice on his site. There LITERALLY a category of posts called "Science Validates Game." I'm not going to sit here and compile a list of all the information available. You're a big boy and I pointed you in the right direction where you can find articles with the science behind things like faking it until you make it. I don't know of any place that is solely the science behind game/TRP. Most often it's hidden in archives. Heartiste has the most of it that …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:52 PM
1

This has nothing to do with hate. I don't hate women or that women are illogical. This doesn't change the fact that the brains of men and women are very different. This is (or should be) common knowledge. I find that more often than not nurture vs nature comes down to nurture reinforcing nature. The lack of gender differences is feminist propaganda, btw.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 08:43 PM
4

Her body is gross to me. The whole skinnyfat thing coupled with weird proportions. Plus that fucking mustache of hers. I feel like Seinfeld. After seeing this shit she's just ruined for me.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 06:26 PM
1

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-18945.html?highlight=kate+upton Her body is flabby as shit. She is the poster child for skinny-fat.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 06:18 PM
1

http://heartiste.wordpress.com/ Pretty much every week Roissy has multiple scientific studies that back up game/TRP principles. There are dozens upon dozens of them in his archives.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 06:08 PM
7

Kate Upton is disgusting.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:48 PM
1

Even girls I've dated that are fringe cases who tend to avoid most female tropes slip up occasionally and show their programming. The cool thing about these chicks is that they realize and back up a bit when it happens. Yeah a good upbringing and all that stuff can have a huge mitigating effect. But the programming is still there. All girls have this programming, in spite of differing reactions to it. Such is the basic message of NAWALT.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:45 PM
1

Yeah it took me like 8 years to learn because I really wanted to believe it too. Every time I take a small step off route and treat a particular girl like maybe she is different is when she shows me exactly how much she's just another girl. This. So much this. It still sort of boggles my mind how this has been true every single time.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:39 PM
-1

Sheer lack of logic and extreme susceptibility to manipulation because of being governed almost completely by emotions is inherent and unchangeable. This is just the 10 billionth example that women are devoid of logic and critical thinking, especially in the abstract or long term. This is TRP 101.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 04:37 PM
2

They also implemented a bachelor tax to promote marriage. Probably won't be long til those come back around.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 06:25 AM
4

And we let them vote.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 02:19 AM
8

I would say that the differences are in style, not in substance. I didn't think that women were similar at first either. But then you see the same patterns forever repeating. When you hear dozens of women literally say the same thing all the time it starts to sort of blur together.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/13 02:13 AM
6

You're a quick learner. It took me too long to figure things out because I figured that NAWALT.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 11:40 PM
13

How many stories of success on here would you think are real? (I have much cynicism for any truth on reddit) The vast majority of the stories I've read are entirely plausible and match up with expected outcomes. Do you think that you can truly ever trust a woman? Yes. More importantly, you can always trust a woman to be a woman. Is there a point in being a woman's friend? Not for me, I don't think so. Is it bad to be the stay at home dad? Generally speaking, yes. Could you ever see yourself in a…
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 11:26 PM
31

Because she told the bf that she was a cheating whore and he's still with her.
/r/TheRedPill29/06/13 10:07 PM
-3

Yep. And it's bound to swing back eventually.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 02:11 PM
1

Another aspect of the red pill is the understanding that a society that doesn't offer men the expectation of marriage and children loses the labor of it's men and will collapse. It's a great time for game and all, because sluts are everywhere. What won't be great is in 50 years or so when the West as we know it ceases to exist.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 06:17 AM
4

why on earth would a self-proclaimed alpha preach RP to anyone else? Because if this blue pill stuff keeps up our society will collapse and we'll be muslim. Will RP ever come full circle and require men to be superhuman in order to be seen as alpha? Hypergamy seems entirely relative and not defined in absolute terms whatsoever. I think that the current state is as close as it's been to what you're talking about. Men have to live up to fairy-tale ideals AND the unbridled narcissism and delusion m…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 06:11 AM
1

Judeo-Christian though has had a pretty massive influence too.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 09:09 PM
0

Everything themoor said is pretty spot on. Additionally: Woman lying on her stomach with you lying on top with a hand grabbing her hair is always a great one. (This pretty much just nails the g-spot) A hand on the throat (or outright choking, depending on the girl) On occasion just go caveman and have her blow you then bend her over and just fuck her and cum. (Women like to just be used sometimes.)
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 09:05 PM
1

Whichever way you spin it, we're fucked haha. The UK will be fucked because in 50 years the country will be under Sharia law :(
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:51 PM
1

1) You're right. I agree that really, women are emotion based creatures devoid of abstract logic and long term thinking. In the same way you don't blame a rabid dog for biting someone, it's ultimately pointless to blame women for being women. Naturally, regardless of blame, the dog is put down and the women will get pumped and dumped until they become cat ladies all while they're forced to slave away is some shitty job. 2) Also keep in mind that really understanding this takes time. Most new TRP…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:46 PM
1

Haha then replace Republican with "conservatives" and Democrats with "leftists" and the same applies.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:31 PM
17

I keep telling myself to focus on myself and my career in movies, but lately its become difficult to shake this anger I feel. Don't worry about the anger. You should be angry. You should be angry that probably everyone you know fed you a pack of lies. You should be angry that women are often such horrible, vile creatures. Embrace the anger and use it to fuel your pursuits. Anger is good. Anger is healthy. Anger is just. Eventually, though you'll still be angry at how fucked up things are, you'll…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:29 PM
7

Neither Republicans nor Democrats are red pill. The only thing you should worry about is whether or not your political views match up with observable reality and go from there.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 08:20 PM
2

This for scratching. Plus a bit of choking to get the point across. If she bites you then slap her and/or choke her with medium force. Enough to definitely cause pain, but not to the point of bleeding or bruising. I find that for penetration with tight girls it helps to just do it gradually. Like at first just put the head in, tease her with that, then some shaft, tease, then most of it, tease, then all of it. This allows her vagina time to adjust to a cock while at the same time driving her cra…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/13 06:52 PM
2

Sort of, but not to that extreme. It's not like a sigma never ever socializes in group settings. The main aspect (imo) is that they operate outside of traditional social hierarchies.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:23 PM
5

Nah Sigmas don't like the social leadership aspect that Alphas do and actually actively avoid it. Alpha - "Hey, we're going to Bar X tonight." Sigma - "I'm going to X tonight." If asked, of course.
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:20 PM
2

Does anyone know of any good links or general advice for pursuing and embracing this path? The only self-defined sigma I'm aware of in the manosphere is Vox Day. His alphagameplan site has some stuff about sigmas scattered throughout. I'd definitely like to know how I can properly balance myself in the group dynamic as we're out on the town or at social events so that I (a) don't come off as an beta follower or (b) don’t seem like I'm hopelessly trying to out-alpha them. I've generally had super…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/13 05:14 PM
1

Both. Simultaneously.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:14 PM
2

As DaddyMonster said: "I was talking. Please don't interupt." I'd also add in, "Didn't your parents teach you any manners?" or something like that to put her on the defensive instead of being bitchy. Just say no to shaming attempts. Just go honey badger and don't give a shit. I sometimes like to also throw in something alluding to women being just as capable as men or some other feminist tripe to flip the script on them.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/13 06:08 PM
0

What's the confusion here?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 07:19 PM
-1

Bullshit. You're talking about a small subsets of all marriages. Obviously marrying some American quasi-feminist slut in the U.S. is a terrible arrangement. Marrying, hypothetically, a Chinese girl in China is an ok arrangement because if you're halfway smart then she won't get a god damn thing. Russia has pretty solid divorce laws too. I took the OP's question to be more in the abstract.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 07:01 PM
5

No, not necessarily. Marriage is the ideal arrangement to have kids, so it has value for that. Getting married just to lock down a steady (lol) supply of pussy is beta.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:59 AM
8

Shit tests will never end. At the start even if you display high value you'll get shit tested to check your congruence with that displayed value. Eventually they lessen but they're still thrown out from time to time.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 04:57 AM
1

By that logic, being alpha isn't alpha because it gives women what they want, i.e. an alpha male. Like anything else, doing what you want to do solely because you want to do it is alpha. If you like to go to nice restaurants and invite a woman to join you in an alpha manner it's alpha. If you like to go to rallies and do the same it's alpha. A few years ago my roommate invited a couple girls over to hang out and play some beer pong. I was finishing a WoW raid when they got here and basically ign…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 09:05 PM
2

I'd disagree. I'd say that fucking guys to get acceptance etc is the main reason women have historically been sluts. Regardless, the hamsterization used to justify a girl fucking a bunch of guys is irrelevant. A slut is a girl with a lot of sex partners, no matter the reason. While there are potentially reformed sluts and perhaps on occasion a girl that was slutty for reasons that may not lead to her actually being able to bond to you and not fuck around on you, this is not something to be count…
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 06:20 PM
5

This is exactly my view as well.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/13 08:02 AM
6

I accidentally hit save before I finished the post, so there's more to be said about it. I also way over-answered something I don't think you were asking, but I'm going to leave it because it may be potentially helpful. But yeah, it's basically that we have to do stuff to get love, which goes against romanticized notions of unconditional love that many blue pill guys had. I was the same way once.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 12:24 PM
10

I'll take a stab at answering this. It IS a hard question and even after loads of answers it's basically going to have to be something that you decide for yourself. I will attempt to clarify some things and input my opinions. if women really can't love us in the nurturring, protecting, take-care->of-me way that I (and most betas) expect, then, what can we expect >from women companionship? You're misinterpreting that post. Women can absolutely be nurturing and caring and all that. A woman in love…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 11:44 AM
1

I read it once 9 years ago so my memory of specifics is hazy. I've actually decided to reread the books and write up a full article on it, but until then here's a sampling of some quotes. “Be the flame, not the moth.” “As for myself, I always willingly acknowledge my own self as the principal cause of every good and of every evil which may befall me; therefore, I have always found myself capable of being my own pupil, and ready to love my teacher.” “I have loved women even to madness, but I have…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 11:01 AM
3

I'm sometimes a slow learner, so for me it took 3 women before the pedestal was gone completely. Hillary Met her freshman year of college. She had a boyfriend, I attracted her and thought she dumped her boyfriend for me. She told me she loved me etc but was a virgin so we fooled around a bit but I never fucked her. I turned beta. The relationship slowly died. Then I found out from a mutual friend that she had been fooling around with 6 other guys the whole time, including her ex. This was in 200…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/13 10:19 AM
2

I've read them all, but just pre-red pill. It's a great series of books. As you mentioned it's not so much the women, though iirc there's a ton of red pill wisdom in there, it's his general outlook and approach to things. Well worth a read, though it is pretty long. Additionally, it's one of the few surviving works that really shows life in the 1700's in Europe, since many works were lost during the French revolution.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/13 06:32 PM
4

This is old copypasta from /b/
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:18 AM
1

They do get unpaid leave though. And what you also see in other countries is that women will use up all their leave and then immediately quit when they get back. It's all a compromise.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:46 AM
6

The 1 in 4 rape thing is a prime example of a horribly unscientific study that was manipulated and then shouted from on high by feminists. http://www.iwf.org/news/2432517/One-in-Four-Rape-myths-do-injustice-too Edit: I've also heard many more reasonable feminists repeat this, among others. Therein lies the problem. These "straw-feminists" do exist, though they aren't a majority. However, they will make shit up and repeat it often enough that people believe it. As for the equality thing: Some fem…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:33 AM
0

Feminists organizations blatantly lie and manipulate data to perpetuate their lies. The wage gap myth has been so thoroughly debunked it's a joke that anyone still believes it. And when you say equality, do you mean equality of opportunity, or equality of outcome?
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:43 PM
3

I would agree that this is pretty much a frivolous example. Actually, half of what this sub argues for is absurd.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:27 PM
3

I don't think OP is suggesting that in this specific instance there is an issue. Rather, it seems he's suggesting that overall there exists a double standard in consent. I'm fairly certain that if the genders were reversed, you'd have some people claiming that it was rape. And as you say "the crux is consent." In many cases, as in California, consent can literally not be given if one person is asleep. Legally, the husband fingering his wife raped her. While a reverse situation would also technic…
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:15 PM
4

This data is also 12+ years old. More current data shows the wage gap to be virtually non-existent. Hell, in some ranges women actually earn more.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:07 PM
0

I didn't realize the sole goal of men's rights was to pursue a feminist agenda that also happens to include men. Regardless, he is correct.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 11:16 PM
10

Not really. Her words could easily have been construed as asking him to hurry up or something. She never said "no" or "stop" or even tried to physically stop the sex.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:30 AM
1

Yes they are.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:11 PM
1

So keeping her father's name instead of her husband's. Still a man's name regardless.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:10 PM
9

No kidding. Doesn't she know that women are stewardesses?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 10:59 PM
1

So in countries like, say, the US, what need is there for feminism? And I really doubt we'll ever get rid of gender stereotypes because they often exist in reality, so again I can't see the point in fighting that.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:59 PM
1

Women already have more rights than men, so why is feminism still relevant? (Serious question)
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:49 AM
-3

What plights do women (as a group) face? There is literally no facet of life in which they don't have a clear advantage. Schools? Tailored to women, and women are the bulk of college graduates. Work? They have equal pay and general equality of opportunity, plus things like mandated maternity leave and in male dominated areas lowered standards for women. Civil liberties? They have the same rights to voting and such that men do. Plus they don't have to sign up for the draft. Victims of crime? Men …
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:39 AM
1

The very ideological foundation of feminism is anti-male, and the vast, vast majority of feminists are as well. Oh maybe not explicitly, but it's still there.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:25 AM
3

Hahahhahaaha. You think a man's word in court counts compared to a woman's? But seriously, innocent until proven guilty really doesn't exist in most cases sadly.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 09:06 AM
4

TL;DR: Feminism and it's continued existence is solely based on keeping women unhappy regardless of their situation.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 08:56 AM
-4

Honestly dude, it is literally impossible to convince women with logic. Your best bet (if you even bother arguing, which is mostly pointless) is to make emotion-based arguments. However, these are unlikely to work since feminism is so ingrained. My personal strategy is just to utterly dismiss pretty much anything a feminist says with an eyeroll or smirk. Long term, I would just encourage any guys to never marry a feminist, or a girl who is in actuality a feminist without explicitly espousing the…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:53 AM
-4

I'll probably get downvoted but... Your parents are right. I mean part of why feminism is so bad is because it encourages things like girls being sluts, i.e. "true to themselves." And there's a good reason for this as sluts are more likely to get std's, get knocked up, end up old spinsters, etc. Really the worst thing about feminism is that it's trying to remove consequences for bad behavior. I mean I don't really care if you want to paint your nails. Good for you and all. But honestly, and I do…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:46 AM
1

How do you mean cognitive difference specifically? While I don't suggest that there are overall differences in general aptitude between the genders, there is certainly a difference in many areas. For example, this study http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899312011572 shows that both men and women both exhibit impulse control, but their brains go about it differently. There are countless similar findings in the differing brain functions between men and women, even when doing th…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 06:27 AM
1

Respectfully, I think that's simply untrue. While I'm sure many psychological analyses of gender don't work on small scales, I really can't believe that they just simply don't exist until a critical mass, seeing as how more substantial branches of science have found them to exist biologically. Either the method of psychologists is insufficiently advanced, or it rests upon false premises. I would hazard that psychology being a social science, many of its concepts are based, or influenced, heavily…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:17 AM
1

Science has definitively proven time and time again that men and women are, generally, wired very differently. While there are always exceptions, the behavioral differences of men and women are purely biologically based. Society dictates the specifics, such as varying fashion, but Nature >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nurture. And as for advertising, that does change behavior, but let's be realistic; no amount of advertising, no matter how good, will make me buy a Bar…
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:18 AM
6

You're fucked without an attorney. You're possibly fucked even with one. The only real way to win in these situations is to be fully lawyered up, with every proof that she's an unfit mother. You basically have to blindside her with overwhelming force. What specifically that is only a lawyer could really tell you. Good luck man.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 10:18 PM
1

True, but the problem is that the system will never really be perfect and it will always side against men. (Barring major changes)
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:31 AM
1

It seems to me that he had 2 points. It's stupid to go to some guy's hotel room if you didn't want to have sex. The act of willingly going into such a private place where sex happens is sort of suggestive that there was at least some intention to have sex, because otherwise it would be stupid to do so.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 02:21 AM
1

The real point to this though is that women have unilateral power in every possible way after you marry them. Sure, men and women can be psychopathic and try to ruin another person's life, but women have the sole ability to do it legally to such devastating effect. That's the issue.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:48 AM
1

That's what the civil suits are for.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 01:41 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter