TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

abaxeron Archive

View 132 posts and 13,889 comments by abaxeron on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
681

abaxeron/r/MGTOW28/03/18 02:23 PM
233

abaxeron/r/MGTOW05/03/18 05:43 PM
208

abaxeron/r/MGTOW07/02/18 06:24 PM
155

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:37 PM
147

abaxeron/r/MGTOW08/01/18 05:12 AM
87

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/21 01:34 PM
80

abaxeron/r/MGTOW12/01/18 11:35 AM
79

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 01:36 PM
69

abaxeron/r/MGTOW22/11/17 04:43 PM
64

Cash Infernoabaxeron/r/MGTOW14/11/17 12:40 PM
63

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 07:51 PM
58

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 06:15 PM
56

abaxeron/r/MGTOW08/01/18 05:33 PM
42

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 05:49 PM
39

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 08:43 AM
39

Legal Rightsabaxeron/r/MensRights29/09/17 11:18 PM
37

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/21 01:22 PM
34

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 10:43 AM
34

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/19 02:28 PM
32

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/24 11:39 AM
32

abaxeron/r/MGTOW26/09/17 01:18 PM
32

Purge Week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 01:09 PM
31

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/23 06:56 PM
30

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 09:40 AM
30

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/24 12:16 PM
30

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/17 01:24 AM
29

abaxeron/r/MGTOW02/11/17 10:12 PM
28

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 08:10 AM
27

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:36 AM
27

abaxeron/r/MGTOW05/06/18 12:18 PM
26

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 09:31 AM
25

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/20 12:07 PM
24

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/20 12:53 PM
24

abaxeron/r/MGTOW28/10/17 11:06 AM
24

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate22/01/19 03:34 PM
22

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/24 10:16 PM
22

abaxeron/r/MGTOW19/03/18 07:39 PM
22

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 11:48 AM
21

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/21 07:00 PM
19

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 09:10 PM
18

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 09:48 PM
18

abaxeron/r/MGTOW07/04/18 09:09 PM
17

discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/18 10:36 AM
17

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/17 07:14 PM
16

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/23 11:48 PM
16

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 05:36 PM
15

abaxeron/r/MGTOW13/06/18 09:31 AM
15

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 12:37 AM
15

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/24 11:58 AM
14

abaxeron/r/MGTOW28/09/17 12:37 PM
14

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 04:48 PM
14

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 01:07 PM
13

abaxeron/r/MGTOW22/10/17 10:02 PM
13

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 11:06 AM
12

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 07:56 PM
12

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/17 11:22 PM
12

Purge Week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 01:14 PM
11

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/23 06:20 PM
11

abaxeron/r/MGTOW24/10/17 10:53 PM
11

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/23 11:26 AM
11

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 11:22 AM
10

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/24 02:00 PM
10

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/19 01:53 PM
9

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/23 08:04 PM
9

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 10:14 AM
9

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 06:44 PM
9

Purge Question For Women!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/21 01:08 PM
9

Question for Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate20/11/17 02:40 AM
9

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/25 11:19 AM
9

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 12:29 AM
8

Debateabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/21 10:50 AM
8

abaxeron/r/MGTOW14/01/18 09:02 PM
8

abaxeron/r/MGTOW07/12/17 11:15 PM
7

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/23 04:03 PM
7

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 10:35 AM
7

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/19 11:47 AM
7

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/24 11:10 PM
6

abaxeron/r/MGTOW20/10/17 04:31 PM
6

Purge Week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/20 03:31 PM
6

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/20 07:30 PM
5

abaxeron/r/MGTOW10/10/17 03:59 PM
5

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 04:30 PM
5

Question for Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/17 09:40 AM
5

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 09:27 AM
5

abaxeron/r/MGTOW29/09/17 06:42 PM
5

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/18 06:03 AM
5

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 04:40 PM
4

Purge week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 08:33 PM
4

Purge week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/21 07:15 AM
4

abaxeron/r/MGTOW20/11/17 01:08 AM
4

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 01:17 PM
4

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/18 12:47 PM
4

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/20 05:48 PM
3

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/23 09:49 AM
3

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 01:47 AM
3

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/21 02:16 AM
3

PURGE WEEKabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/23 01:32 PM
3

Question for Menabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/17 10:27 PM
3

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/17 11:51 PM
3

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 01:34 PM
3

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/18 07:23 PM
2

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/23 11:48 AM
2

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 05:13 PM
2

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 11:00 AM
2

CMVabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 11:04 AM
2

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 03:26 AM
2

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/20 12:28 PM
2

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/17 07:32 PM
2

Purge Week!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 12:27 AM
2

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 12:46 AM
2

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/22 11:18 AM
2

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/22 06:57 PM
2

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/19 08:22 AM
2

discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/18 02:10 PM
1

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 11:29 AM
1

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/22 10:18 PM
1

Question for BluePillabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/25 03:16 PM
1

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 11:00 AM
1

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/18 08:06 AM
1

Scienceabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/20 12:22 PM
1

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 02:16 PM
1

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/24 06:04 PM
1

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 12:16 PM
1

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/18 10:00 AM
0

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/23 05:24 AM
0

Purge Science!abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/21 07:59 PM
0

abaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/18 12:24 PM
0

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/25 03:10 PM
0

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 09:02 AM
0

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/21 08:50 PM
0

Question For Womenabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/24 10:53 PM
0

Discussionabaxeron/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 11:03 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 13,889 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)

Please quote me saying that. Because most directors are (straight) men, that often means that the camera lingers on things that straight men will find interesting [...] there is a 96% chance have been catapulted into the POV of a dude looking at women, and sometimes women like to instead be in the POV of a woman looking at men, and this is not available to them. Considering that women are estimated to make up at least 8% of top directors, you seem to think that all men and half of women director…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 09:44 PM

Even if I take everything you say as gospel truth, none of it contradicts what I said. Yes we do need to teach formal logic in schools because Yes, what I said does contradict your claim. You said that straight males are basically innately organically unable, incapable, never can even come close to truly comprehend women's perspective, which on the industry's scale is multiplied by their additional stubborn unwillingness to even try. You are entitled to hold onto this belief, I am entitled to po…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 05:20 PM

Women-made films often don't concentrate on men's body parts, on men at all, make men villains, and/or a butt of a joke; the belief that men are innately incapable of making properly straight-women-tailored content is not only sexist, but fails the most surface reality check. Out of 3 ongoing TV shows most popular among women, 2 are run by men (with feature films women are faring even worse: two out of four MCU films (co-)directed by women rank among the five lowest-grossing movies in the franch…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/26 09:20 AM
1

"My habit is terrible" was not the core of my argument. Here's what was: a) Eavesdropware app's algorithmic slop engine feeding you unverified one-sided rage content from one source does not prove anything about any specific demographic, scenario, or life strategy / arrangement. b) "Believing" the most desirable outcome will just happen is un-adult, "fearing" the worst scenario will happen instead to the point of decision paralysis is childish. Everything is "risky". c) Even assuming this woman'…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 08:36 PM
5

You've chosen to identify your thread as a Debate. As such you are expected to actively engage in your own thread with a mind open to being changed. PPD has guidelines for what that involves. OPs author must genuinely hold the position and you must be open to having your view challenged. An unwillingness to debate in good faith may be inferred from one or several of the following: Ignoring the main point of a comment, especially to point out some minor inconsistency; Refusing to make concessions…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 07:40 PM
2

I have a terrible habit of ironically thanking women for their side of the story that we have nothing to check, verify, and compare against. Are the children actually his? Has he one day discovered an STI that appeared as if out of nowhere? Has he granted her a lump sum of bounce-back-from-pregnancy money that she flushed on designer bags? Has her pregnancy drained his savings because she insisted on fanciest hospital and treatment plan and was insisting on doing so again? What this TikTok perso…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 07:26 PM

I have mentioned here that a thing as easy as regular daily pull-ups has increased the amount of random women talking to me from 0 in 5-ish years to 7 in 3 months. Most wanted free money, stuff, or labor from me, but still. Do you also believe you can build attraction? You can make a Chevrolet Spark go as fast as an F1 if you throw it from a plane. But why would you do something like that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/26 06:43 PM
5

There's also the 10% of primary female breadwinners. Guess what? They together make up 16% of marriages, and even lesser share of marriages with more than one child. For comparison, women relying on husbands primary or sole breadwinners make up 55% of marriages, and 48% even if childless. not your garbage "thread within a thread" source American Time Use Survey is the primary source that Pew researches rely on; you can see it in fine print on their figures. So the husband earns $5K more than his…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 05:56 PM
2

I know some men ask women if they think men are the problem. And if they say yes, I want these specific women to stay away from men. But since they share an ideology that 61% of women say describes them "very" or "somewhat well", I want all-male spaces, workplaces, hospitals, dining places, and gyms. If a woman claims women in the U.S. can survive on their own with no males or an extremely small male population (<1%), the first thing men bring up is how women will not be safe because of Cholera.…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 04:23 PM
4

You did not check my source, do you have a "don't lie for 1 minute" mode? Egalitarian women constitute less than a third of married women, and even lesser share of mothers. Sole female breadwinner / SAHD six percent. SAHMs do 14.1 hours of childcare. How the hell do SAHDs only manage to do an extra 2 hours of childcare per week than his wife, when he doesn’t work?! "SAHDs" are (mostly) not a lifestyle choice; it's men recovering from injury or illness before they get back to being a breadwinner,…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 04:20 PM
2

The problem, as usual, is that fathers are lazy douchebags who don't do their fair share of chores or childcare. Fathers do more overall than mothers. Earning for your child's college is care work. You and every person who upvoted you are malicious liars. Your PS5 has seen you for about 25.2 hours this week don't date console peasants. do some childcare for once Take your neuroticism pills - italics to signify argument by analogy, not a serious suggestion. You might be taking too many pills alre…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 03:05 PM
1

I love the glimpses of bygone Peak Woke era in older Black Mirror seasons. "Your cooking smells" does not mean "I hate you an your entire culture". It means your cooking friggin' smells.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 11:19 AM
2

Most owed child support isn't paid. Most owed child support is paid. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/2017/chldsu17.pdf Ctrl+F -> "Percent of aggregate actually received" (62.2 total, and more by mothers than by fathers)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/26 08:50 AM
0

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/ "When husbands are the breadwinner..." section: in sole male breadwinner marriages, women spend 6 hours more on leisure than men per week; while women spend 9.6 hours more on caregiving and 9.1 hours more on housework, men spend 43.9 hours more on paid labor. The rest of the disparity goes to (among other things) "Personal care" general category, which Pew does not ana…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/26 11:15 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rokeby_Venus Velázquez and Rubens actually met. You have no idea what history is. Kek.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 07:09 PM
6

"I believe in Women's Rights and Women's Wrongs" My Googling says "I support women's rights and wrongs". Which is kind of another thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 12:21 PM

Just because a relationship didn’t work out doesn’t mean Using the same theme and vibe, finish this sentence but about the woman from your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 10:42 AM

...Sorry, forgot to answer that paragraph at the end. When I was in my 20s, I would have never french-kissed a woman if I wasn't ready to spend every second next to her until my last breath. It didn't go well as none of them shared this approach. Now, I always hope for the best, but never truly bet everything on it. Because nothing is ever serious anymore, and millions of women celebrate it as their "human right". I cannot blame men for adapting to reality that most of them were born into. And I…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 11:07 PM
2

Some of the black mirror episodes are so dumb it's painful. Arkangel: protecting your own 15yo daughter from hooking up with adult drug dealer is "overbearing parenting". Running away from "overbearing mother" is considered the ultimate karmic punishment. When I was young, it was Tuesday. The mother did two things wrong: spiked the daughter's drink with plan B without telling, and did not send the video feed from the daughter's eye cameras to police.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:55 AM
1

I have no idea what "being serious" means anymore. Dating is not "serious" because people date without "being exclusive", and apparently it's totally normal that "being exclusive" is what you have to discuss and negotiate separately, but exclusive is also not "serious" because well, sex is just sex apparently, like scratching an itch. Marriage is not "serious" as half of marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary. Children are not "serious" because anywhere between 2 and 4% of women get pregnan…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/26 10:11 AM
2

the premature ejaculator's job Sounds like a job for... (cape swoosh) The Premature Ejaculator! (lightning)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/26 11:57 AM
3

The list is overwhelmingly men. The politicians attacking democratic institutions Who invented, made, and enforced democratic institutions in the first place? the tech bros trying to build libertarian tax-haven islands in the ocean What are tech sis'es trying to build? Theranos? Using Red Pill logic, shouldn't we conclude that men are simply less suited to power? Many countries enforce gender quotas in governments to guarantee female representation. Bandgladesh, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Pakista…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 07:10 PM
0

The premise of Snowpiercer: capitalism is so bad that only thanks to capitalists investing into building an ark-train, anyone, no matter how few, is alive at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 04:23 PM
4

most modern men want their female partners to work. They feel quite strongly about this EMPLOYED: men, partnered: 91%; men, unpartnered: 73%; women, partnered: 74%; women, unpartnered: 72%. FINANCIALLY VULNERABLE: men, partnered: 13%; men, unpartnered: 36%; women, partnered: 38%, women, unpartnered: 37%. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/pst_10-05-21_unpartnered_adults-0-3-png/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/26 03:16 PM
5

Of course ideally women would adore it if all men equally courted all women while equally actually romantically pursuing none. The answer is "No. We are not your harem eunuchs."
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/26 06:42 AM
6

Women are right: It's not all men, but it's always a man. Nothing and no-one is holding you from looking up BJS numbers on what percentage of aggravated assaults against women are committed by other women. If it's more than zero, women are wrong. If it's more than ten, women aren't even right approximately. Spoiler, it's around twenty. The same thing happened with generative AI. You can do almost anything with that technology, and one of the first major uses was men creating non-consensual sexua…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/26 07:35 AM
2

I want to go bald! I want to break free from my hair! I'm so self satisfied I don't need hair! I've got to go bald! God knows, God knows I want to go bald!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 08:56 PM

the type of work and the structure in which in was performed. Yes. For example, 350,000 men and 0 women got conscripted into American Civil War. See: Martha Ballard You'll have to be more specific than pointing to 10,000 entries.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:20 PM

Yes, Case closed. "The „trad wife“, who did „not work“ was a blink in time. - And even then only the rich ones." - is false. Right now, 23 percent of married women (regardless of having children) have zero wage income. Nearly upper quartile of married population is hardly "the rich".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:17 PM

Not even in the 1820s. Even Napoleonic code, presumably the patriarchiest of the patriarchiey civil codes, allowed women to have their own bank accounts, make deals, run business, and stand in court by themselves if they had a profession. Inb4 "US is not France" - Louisiana adopted Napoleonic code. You people know less than nothing and dare to throw a fit that someone used a hyperbole.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:17 PM

We can mostly theorize on what division and comparative burden of labor was between genders prior to time use surveys. USA adopted 40-hour work week only in 1938. When women did more stuff than they do now, men did also.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 12:36 PM

women just started coveting the breadwinner role Not really. Have you tried asking women why they clutch onto their "career opportunities" so much and lament "having to" sacrifice them? - "What if relationship ends". This is not "the breadwinner role", this is the "aspiring divorcee role".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:40 AM

In year 1965 an average, average, average, average married woman spent less than 10 hours a week on wage labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:37 AM

By year 1900, ALL US states have adopted Married Women's Property Acts. NO woman alive today was ever denied the right to her wages just because she wasn't a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 11:24 AM

"Ohmaigawd but whatabout women in 1820s?" They are dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 10:23 AM
4

But why not get the cheap test first to even see if this is an issue? I have just spent 366 letters explaining why. Is this you admitting that you post responses from pre-made list and not actually reading the comments and writing responses that are relevant? Why are we pretending like this is in anyway relevant to the endless discussions of paternity fraud? Because you people insist that in cases of paternity fraud we need to establish malicious intent. Maybe women don't know that letting a man…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:28 AM
4

Because if my baby got swapped, I would be very interested to sort the thing out and stop my baby fed by a random woman's breast milk as quickly as possible. Non-court-admissible test -> first court hearing -> court-admissible test ordered -> second court hearing -> decision made -> decision enforced. I am ready to spend $100-200 in advance to skip a couple steps.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:25 AM
4

Court-admissible parentage test requires DNA samples of both parents, regardless of whose parentage is tested (algorithm excludes the specific markers of one parent to check the markers of the other for match). "Peace of mind" cheek swab test kits are not court-admissible. Birds, stone, all that. I don't see how a woman's reputation is injured and emotional suffering happened because she knows her baby was not accidentally swapped at the hospital. My SO got us restaurant pizza when we got our te…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:20 AM
4

Proportional to damages caused, ~$400 or so. I.e. 1-4 times more than the cost of court-admissible paternity test. There also needs to be rigorously court-established that he called her a lying cheating whore. Otherwise we can't eliminate the possibility that he was just concerned for hospital swap. "He asked for paternity test == he automatically called her a lying cheating whore" is a neurotic hysterical fantasy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 03:06 AM

Stop mixing up sole breadwinners and egalitarian relationships. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. Most relationships are not egalitarian. 55% of wives (not wives with children; just wives) rely on their hubands as …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 02:33 AM
1

Where are u getting this data? American Time Use Survey, year 2023, data series TUU10101AA01012103 (wage labor and commute, men), ..25599 (husbands), ..12219 (women), ..25664 (wives), ..43129 (fathers), ..43138 (mothers). how are sports not leisure? Sports are required for men not to drop dead from heart attack, they should have been categorized as personal care.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/26 01:54 AM
1

Stop gaslighting women You've been called out on reposting this nonsense even by people who agree with your position generally. Men work 3.1 more hours than women per week This includes paid and unpaid work; when looking only at paid work, men work ~8.3 hours more than women generally, 9.6 hours more than women when both are married, and 6.44 hours more than women when both have children younger than 18 in the household; the latter statistic is not limited to married couples. That means that 11.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 03:57 PM
1

How many?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 02:22 PM
0

various dating forums Women more often have anti-keyboard nails done and/or can't do blind typing. When a woman is single, she is out there Are we still talking "various dating forums" or do you switch to personal impression/anecdotes here? Single, never-married, childless men have invented 40% of everything that made our current life possible. starting a pottery class, traveling, getting a promotion Last time I checked, all of these are more common for married women. or are we going to have an …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/26 08:08 AM

I live in a western country and everyone works here, men and women What Western country has employment-to-population ratio of men and women exactly the same? In the US, they diverge by 10 percentage points https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf table A-6. Numbers are somewhat different but quite similar in Denmark, Norway, Britain, and France. I literally don't know any woman who would expect to not work and spend her days "swiping her boyfriend/husband's credit card" as you put it. Twe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 02:40 PM

You have never said anything positive about men you (or your fellas) do find attractive (or at least I can't remember a damn thing, and you chose to hide your post and comment history), so apparently such men either don't exist at all, or are so rare that they don't alter the picture in any meaningful way.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/26 12:46 PM
1

My study You did not bring any specific study, just a BBC article rambling all around the topic without ever committing to a specific point, outright confirming most of red pill truths and then cucking out into "but have you considered that all of it is ackshully a good thing?". Yes, I have, and I came to conclusion that tens of thousands of men killing themselves for divorce-related reasons every year cannot under any reasonable definition of good be considered "a good thing". perhaps I do not …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 01:50 PM

No, significantly less than 40% of children get no child support, especially of custodial mothers, since many parents pay partially.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 11:03 AM

You would have spent less time and energy clicking and finding out than asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 10:53 AM

Most child support is being paid. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/2017/chldsu17.pdf Ctrl+F -> "Percent of aggregate actually received" (62.2 total, and more by mothers than by fathers)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 07:23 AM
1

"How Couples Meet and Stay Together Survey", Rosenfeld et al. The question of the survey was "Between you and [spouse], who wanted the [divorce/separation] more?"; not "who filed for divorce?".
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/26 04:45 AM
1

I am not willing to discuss tangents unrelated to my comment or OP. OP asserts that there should be even more financial incentives at men's expense to motivate women to do three things they already do more than men: marry, divorce, and stay jobless. I disagree. I did not say that women file for divorces more.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 11:16 PM
3

Thank for reminding, you and OP both assert another thing without evidence: women make children for men. Women only have children for themselves with 100% decision-making power, the baseline that a current/former SAHM should be compared (and compare herself) to is a never-married single mother. Are former SAHM divorcees having it better or worse poverty-wise than never-married single mothers? I am asking because I don't know. And let's be honest: would OP even make this post if men were the ones…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 06:44 PM
4

Asserted without evidence: women have and give up their "chances for professional success" and "ambitions"; men stuck on the same often shitty job for decades paying mortgage and children's tuition fees don't give up a damn thing. I am not saying this from a progressive point of view. Believing that women have JUST as much (or more) "chances" and "ambitions" in professional sphere as men, that every housewife is a potential CEO who sacrificed her glorious career for family, or that men don't neg…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 11:51 AM
1

If you think women don’t like sex, you are telling on yourself If you think men don't like women, emotional connections, relationships, true intimacy, and "would rather sexually coerce (rape) their wives than leave them", you are telling on yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 09:20 AM

Working hours for men: 44.1 hours. Working hours for women: 41.1 hours. You conflate "women", "wives", and "mothers"; these numbers are only for egalitarian marriages, which constitute 29% of all marriages and even lesser share of marriages with children. 55% of marriages are non-egalitarian with wives relying on husbands as sole or primary breadwinners, and even higher share of marriages with children. From your own source: "Across all opposite-sex marriages in 2022, the median earnings for wiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/26 08:07 AM

So can we claim that 78% of fathers do their fair share of childcare? No, we can't. "Yes, we can. Yes, we can!" (c)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/26 09:37 PM
5

I started working out regularly around half a year ago; within ~3 months, 5 random women spoke to me unprompted for the first time in ~5 years, mostly to compliment my clothes (the clothes are the same they were for years, literally bought in bulk). Am I allowed to trust my own experiences over "gender studies" retold by an anonymous person on the Internet very vaguely? The only three specific things you said were "Henry Cavill", a 40k nerd with a Custodes army, "narrow clothing choices", and "a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 12:05 PM
4

Women initiate 2/3rds of divorces and the majority of breakups in times when men do more chores than ever, and for every extra hour of domestic labor that an average wife still does somewhat more of (because she is at home after her part-time employment while the husband is at a 2-month-long business trip), the average husband brings in an hourly wage of a cybersecurity engineer. 2% of children in intact families are raised by unaware non-fathers. Women are more likely to self-report having chea…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 09:21 AM
8

"Misandry" is not "women don't want to settle for undesirable men". Women do settle for undesirable men all the time despite presumably "earning their own money now" etc. - there are more ever-married women than men, half of marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary, 2/3rds of divorces are demanded by women (not just filed for, that's even higher), women are more likely than men to remarry up until age 45, and the divorce industry is probably chunkier than IT and comparable to energy sector. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 08:32 AM
11

What everyday disadvantages of feminism do you experience? Taxation of income (figure 2)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 11:31 AM
1

I don't; my main focus here is maltreatment of (legal or civil) husbands who are out of the dating scene, and I don't plan to return to dating ever if my current relationship fails. Any woman who would like me to can just come up to me and speedrun the whole thing by saying "I have never loved you" and demanding I buy her a house.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:36 AM
2

I can ask it, right? Yes. Is true that men marry the convenient women they CAN have, while spend their lives secretly obsessing over the women they truly desire but can't have? Yes. Caveat: I and my SO are both lewd fantasy fans; we can't have the partners we "truly desire" because they don't exist in reality and couldn't exist even with alien-tier genetic engineering.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/26 08:33 AM
0

Women no longer need to worry about safety as the population of creeps drop by 80%. Good luck fighting off bears. What percentage of wildlife control services are women? Women also commit much less crime across the board because crimes are defined through actions committed predominantly by men. Breastfeeding while high on drugs is not a crime, for example. Even outright acts of violence against babies get "classified away" as "syndromes" rather than crimes when committed by women. Women are also…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 08:27 PM
2

...You are right, I forgot drug addiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_such_thing_as_a_free_lunch
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 08:10 PM
3

If an 18-year-old girl suddenly started flirting with me today, I would be - not 99% - 100% certain she either takes part in an elaborate scam, has a massive debt, an unwanted pregnancy, an incurable STI, a basket full of super-weird kinks/fetishes, some weird and probably expensive chronic health/physiology stuff, or just brain-bolts so loose that they're about to fall out. I got my share of young sex when I was young. Now I'd like some peace of mind with a side of silence, please.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 06:32 PM
1

shall I make a list of the incel murders? The 2009 Collier Township shooting (Pittsburgh, PA), 2018 Toronto van attack, The 2014 Isla Vista attack, 2020 Toronto Spa Murder, 2021 Plymouth Shooting England, etc. I am talking about things affecting most men (taxes, earning for families, divorces, feminism), you focus on a handful of incidents through a dozen years that affected two handfuls of victims. At least two perpetrators spent their childhoods in therapy that you so enthusiastically recommen…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 06:19 PM
1

Women are not stupid, most don't have babies until they partner up with a beta... better earner. Paying anyone less for the same job done just as well is illegal, regardless of parental status.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 01:41 PM
0

Childless women earn less than childless men, whatever slop algorithm fed you the info to the opposite, I am certain you didn't check it to the primary source. The richest American self-made billionaire woman is the mother of seven.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/26 12:53 AM
1

I'm all for internal locus of control. Maybe women earning less than men are just choosing worse-paying jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 11:25 PM
1

Despte constituting 10 to 15 percent of murder perpetrators, (cis) women made up 0% of the executed since 2021. I usually only discuss things like this with people capable of understanding proportions, odds ratios, and effect sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/26 10:56 PM
0

Send not to know for whom the bell cooms, it cooms for thee.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:37 PM
1

Phewh! Sorry, a busy couple days. What do you mean women 'doing it for me'? "I have lived with men and it is amazing how blind they can be to what women do until there is not one around to do it." - just like many other men, I've spent many years by myself without any women doing anything for me and was fine. More men than women are never married; most men who are married earn the majority of household income; men produce most of goods, support most of critical infrastructure, make up the majori…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 11:30 PM
3

If you’re even showing a hint of capability women will pick you up and seek you out aggressively. "If you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 12:05 PM

You’re making a claim about half the population. OP: Why obsess over women with terrible boyfriends? Me: these women have the right to vote, and will almost always use it to promote taking away even more of my rights, freedoms, and money to solve the consequences of their own shitty life choices You: You’re making a claim about half the population Either you are claiming that all women have terrible boyfriends, or you are wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 08:55 PM
2

I stayed with my dad at the age of 16 after my parents' divorce and applied for my first official job the same year, then spent 8 years in college, university, and postgrad dorms, then military service and a convoy mission. What all those places had in common is complete absence of women "doing it" for me. On money and taxes: 1) taxation is designed to overburden predominantly men breadwinners; 2) breadwinners are forced to share the fruits of their wage labor outside their family; 3) mostly-wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 08:36 PM

You said women took away your rights. "these women have the right to vote, and will almost always use it to promote taking away even more of my rights, freedoms, and money to solve the consequences of their own shitty life choices". let's stick to the claim you made Come back to me when you are ready to do so, spend your time productively in the meantime.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 07:07 PM

That’s not women taking away your rights. Abortion restrictions are not men taking away women's rights. And by this I mean "I am ready to shut up when women are". Except to bear arms is a right, abortion is not. I checked. that still isn’t women “taking your money.” That's women who aren't mothers of my child taking the money from the woman who is. I'm a normal guy, I earn very little for myself. Okay. Then why bring up women at all? Men can't have children on their own (women can since the 1950…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 05:09 PM

What rights and freedoms have women taken away from you, specifically? Some years ago I had to rush buying a shotgun because the specific model was about to fall under certain fresh restrictions... because it looks spoOoOoky to a liberoid mind and because some bastard used an entirely different model to shoot up a school. To buy the gun and some other things without significant impact to family budget, I have to maintain employment that puts me in an oof-taxable bracket: EVERY study on the topic…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 03:17 PM

I am certain I've already answered this question to you, but since you have 4 basically-the-same posts on rotation, it's worth repeating. Two main reasons: 1) these women have the right to vote, and will almost always use it to promote taking away even more of my rights, freedoms, and money to solve the consequences of their own shitty life choices; 2) these women's fecundity is rodent-tier, and their half-psychopathic perma-angry unstable crotch fruits attend the same school as my kid.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 01:44 PM
4

Paragraphs rearranged by order of significance/relevance. Improving maternal mortality does not lessen the need to improve workplace laws and protections. One does not take from the other. This is not a race to the finish using death amounts. You have spent three paragraphs of OP comparing men's and women's deaths, now when faced with objective data that men die more, in all age brackets, for the broadest spectrum of reasons, the gap is expanding, and currently sex mortality ratio in affluent wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/26 11:10 AM
16

Repeating my comment from the last time you made this post when it got removed by mods: Most of what they are told are lies maybe some guys are genuinely kind but I can only imagine how many “kind” men were wolves in sheep clothing. If you believe that most men are some sort, variety, or flavor of rapists, there is nothing to discuss. You should support mandatory gender segregation with men providing women with frozen sperm through automated drones. Inb4 "there's nothing about rape in the OP" - …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 02:46 PM
6

However, 669 women in the US died as a result of pregnancy or childbirth in the same year. Globally, about 260,000 women died from maternal causes in 2023. Gender privilege is usually understood as societal structure maintaining personal circumstnaces resulting in certain outcomes; even feminist theory does not include things like physical strength or ability to reach top shelves into "male privilege" - gender disparities in height and upper body strength are known to be natural and not social. …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 09:44 AM
5

Where are the decent men? Watching p0rn, duh
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:51 PM
1

people should support equal rights because it is the morally right thing to do that's classical liberalism, and it was actually invented by men. Feminism is dogmatic postulation that all men are women's class enemy, including those women's own sons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 10:20 AM

No; I have lost attraction to someone after they opened their mouth and started talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/26 08:31 AM
1

Why do men believe they peak in their 50s? Was going to answer only to this part because the rest looks like an incoherent meandering high BPD mind diarrhea, but I watched a video by Dr. Grande checked out who this fella is; short answer - he doesn't, he drops nuggets of obvious counter-truths to make engagement with his content simmer, and judging by this thread, his approach is successful. Glad for your friends, I never was a "hot, attractive guy with stamina" who fucked older guys' young wive…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 10:49 PM
3

If I am "stepping outside of a committed relationship" I can show normal human decency to the only woman that gave birth to my child by sparing ten seconds to say "I am breaking up with you". Some think it is a fair exchange to put that condition into place in order to accept something they did not want to accept This is perfectly reasonable, but you don't have to be a dick about it. Or Darth Vader from Robot Chicken.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 08:35 PM
1

What women want is the only thing that matters. If a woman wants to have sex with her boss, that's not rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 03:03 PM
3

Most men don't understand what rape is because they think of women as less. No, we actively reject the progressoid notion and concept of "basically-rape". They do understand consent like every woman does. They understand that it can be withdrawn. Consent cannot be withdrawn retroactively, can be given in a state of voluntary mild altered brain chemistry, and is not automatically nullified by social circumstances. A loving married couple having sex after two glasses of wine or a joint is not rape…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 02:45 PM
5

Oh, a flashback grenade :) like a truth bomb, but also hits more personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 01:42 PM
1

Men are much more vulnerable to becoming sex addicts, and widely stupid enough to mistake it for love.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 09:11 AM
2

To both possible interpretations of your question: is marriage a good or a bad thing, and is marriage being Blue Pill (i.e. part of the mainstream comfy lie) a good or a bad thing, my answer is - a kinda pathetic thing, which for me is variation of "bad".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/26 10:35 AM
0

Men: do more chores and baby / child care than ever while still being primary breadwinners in most marriages This thread's friggin' comment section full of psychopaths: did not notice
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 04:15 PM
2

The question was "Do you believe women should cater more to men/be less selective?", so I focused on women. Men have their own stuff; men should not harbor unrequited feelings, and should see and understand sex, arousal, and idealization of women as addictions (less of this nonsense would also mean less unwanted pregnancies). As divorces are uniquely devastating to men, they should either do much better at being financially and mentally prepared for them, or not get married at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 03:45 PM
5

at somepoint we have to use words as they are defined and feminism has objective definitions and a army of researches / authors... a whole hell of a lot of the world that think they are feminist, are not. Give us the list of 5 real feminists with published written works on feminism. If you can't, then feminists basically don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 09:10 AM
8

Do you believe women should cater more to men/be less selective? No, I think women should be more selective. Violent angry psychopathic convict men should not have reproductive advantage and more children with law-abiding women (per capita) than law-abiding men have with anyone. Women should not marry their future ex-husbands. If the guy's kinda fine but you don't see yourself as his life partner, just date like normal people. Women should not have unprotected penetrative sex with non-father-mat…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 08:51 AM
3

The entire situation (assuming it happened at all and you are retelling it somewhat faithfully) sounds like one huge idiot fest on all sides. Starting with "a party between colleagues" even happening in a setting where "a dress that shows a fair amount of cleavage but not in a gross way" even works (I'm ready to bet it was some "internal communications" person's idea and she - of course it's a she - even got paid for coming up with it and keeps working to this day), where you were "open to getti…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 06:06 AM
3

Humanity succeeded in writing, math, nuclear fission, eradicating smallpox, landing on the Moon, sending probes to Pluto. But can't figure out having sex, raising children, and sharing stuff with family members without supervision, management, and intervention by tribal chiefs, religious authorities, and/or family court judges. Pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 07:26 PM
5

Marriage IS blue pill. Marriage IS blue pill. Marriage IS blue pill. On any point of the globe, at any point in history.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 01:59 PM
1

First, I don't believe you for a second that anyone actually said that the way that you are retelling it to us. "Working for a living" is not and has never been a problem, it's very much a human constant since we developed thumbs. The problem for me is not "working for a living", it's working for a living, education, retirement benefits, rent-stabilized housing, etc. of ~100 million other individuals that I don't even personally know who hate me for being too huwhyte-passing, too straight, too m…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/26 08:23 AM
3

Another person who wants a nazi pride rally on Holocaust remembrance day. False equivalence; being straight, faithful in monogamous marriage, or raising children is not advocating genocide (I was also told that being straight is not a choice); the Holocaust actually happened, the only documented case of legal prosecution of lesbians in the US history happened before the war for independence and got them sentenced to basically public apology.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:51 PM
2

If the last moral high grounds to fight for are: THE MONTH JUNE, THE WORD "WOMAN", THE RAINBOW, AND THE FLAG DESIGN, then "LGBTQ+" has won. If they don't want these terrible hateful bigots at their events anyway, there should be no problem with another event existing. Not everything that the majority, the norm, the bland does necessarily has genocidal intent. Most people don't spend 11 months a year celebrating straightness because most normal people work.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 04:15 PM
4

A lot of Red Pill guys say they want marriage, families, stable long-term relationships, less promiscuity, and stronger communities with shared values. Tradcuckery is blue pill. I don't care about these things happening or not happening; I care if I am forced to absorb the costs. If I did care, I know things that work better than threats of painful retribution in afterlife.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 04:06 PM
10

False, Adrienne Cecile Rich's work openly and proudly says that the scope of her essay is all women including self-identified heterosexual and/or women in straight marriages "today" (that is, at the moment of publication, 1980) existing on what she calls a "lesbian continuum", asserting that even simple female friendships are fundamentally of the same nature as women's same-sex romantic or sexual attraction, because they bond and unify women against men trying to forcibly push them into the hete…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 04:25 PM

OP claims to be a man; when asked to elaborate, he said he explained everything in the OP and will not elaborate further. Most of what women (especially attractive women) are told by men are lies - okay, why do those men lie to those women? To get a free place to stay, to make the women absorb the men's student debt, to make those women fix those men's cars? - Let's not fool ourselves, OP is implying that men lie to women to get sex. How is it called when a man obtains sex from a woman by lying …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:28 PM

Uh-huh, also most men have shorter than median dicks. By definition of median.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 03:06 PM
7

RP/blackpill "doods" getting feminist nonsense banned from the sub is even larger win.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:50 PM

Most of what they are told are lies maybe some guys are genuinely kind but I can only imagine how many “kind” men were wolves in sheep clothing. If you believe that most men are some sort, variety, or flavor of rapists, there is nothing to discuss. You should support mandatory gender segregation with men providing women with frozen sperm through automated drones.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 02:31 PM
1

I want to be someone that you can't live without I am not 16, I can live without almost anyone, people I can't live without are interchangeable (doctors, chefs, farmers, ...), and I seriously doubt that you would appreciate someone this emotionally dependent on you; at least most women don't. Would you find a guy attractive if he severely self-harmed after his last breakup? Or would you see it as an immediate red flag?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 01:08 PM
7

(chomp chomp) (sluuuuuuurp) Cool. More feminist nonsense banned. Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:15 PM
1

No idea; I am not most men. What I do know is that some time ago I was sitting in a bus, and a woman with a son came in; I stood up and sat across telling her "Please, have a seat facing forward". What I wanted from her is to make her son sit face-forward next to a window so he doesn't get motion-sick and doesn't throw up all over me, from the perspective of a guy who was always motion-sick as a kid, and who is raising a motion-sick child of his own. Approximately 52% of adult men in the United …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:09 PM

90/10 or so; I have employment and passive income and a side gig; she has some passive income and contributes to the side gig.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/26 03:01 PM
4

This is such a confusing take to me... This applies to women too. Not even close. There are 2x as many married women as married men building careers for their planned future divorced life, 4x bringing zero income into the household, and 3x bringing less than 40%. I think the majority of men would have sex with the majority of women and walk away not giving another thought about them Women initiate the majority of divorces and breakups, and their decisions to do so are very sensitive to financial…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 05:04 PM
3

I am not selling you men because men are not for sale; I will just reiterate what I told previously: you can look outside, and virtually everything you see there was designed, built, repaired, and maintained by men providing for their families. If it doesn't count because ... (checks your notes) men get to date women damn lucky bastards, men like you so much that they want to touch you, and men try to be entertaining and accomodating when on a date with you - your complaint isn't that men aren't…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:27 PM
11

Widows carry almost no negative effects of single moms, my role in such a woman's life would be 100% determined by how much she wants to see me as a permanent family member and not a bailout. If her kid is cool, I can help out with some stuff without us becoming a couple.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 02:24 PM
3

I am frustrated because thanks to screwed up taxation/benefit system I have to support 100 million women instead of four (mother, mother-in-law, sister, wife). A quarter of prime-age women are perfectly fine not being employed. Voting for simps to support women at the expense of men married to someone else is not power nor autonomy. There are consistently more never-married men than never-married women, there are roughly as many never-married women now as there were in 1880, and women are more, …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 09:45 PM
1

"Women appreciate compliments, just not from guys"
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 03:19 PM

iT iS BeTteR To DiE FoR ThE EmPeRoR tHaN LiVe FoR YoUrSeLf
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:22 AM
1

"Women only started demanding the vote for themselves after the threat of men they deem unworthy getting it first became tangible, which proves that they don't actually care; somehow majorly brought up in emancipation debate when the topic is abolition of slavery" Scare-quotes and italics to signify reasoning by analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 05:52 PM
1

men as a whole don't seem to have this mindfulness Who does seem to have this mindfulness then?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 02:13 PM
4

Women sharing this belief not being straight is not "the truth"; it's trivial irrelevancy, none of you is my wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:16 AM

sex usually not pleasant at best, and painful or dangerous I don't want anyone sharing or believing this idiotic lie ever calling themselves straight. I don't care if they are lesbian, or asexual, or whatever. If you don't like the process, don't torture the hardware. Real slow for the people in the back: ANY woman who thinks sex with men is "not pleasant at best" is not straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 11:02 AM
6

https://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-13-13.pdf "The highest peaks [of women never getting married] occurred in 1880 and in 2011 when 31% and 29%, respectively, of women were never married." [Figure 2] I think the premise "Women overwhelmingly partnered with men in the past" is flawed and lacks nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/26 12:34 AM

You may notice it never saying "the majority". "a growing share" being less than a third.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 11:31 PM
3

55% of married men earn at least 60% of family income. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/st_2023-04-13_breadwinner-wives_02-png/ FIFTY-SIX percent of married men do in couples younger than 34. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/st_2023-04-13_breadwinner-wives_03-png/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/26 08:40 AM
7

the gap isn’t that large That's what she said.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:50 PM
3

No woman ever out-competed a man in an open shooting competition with a handgun (predominant weapon of homicide), industrial poisons are deliberately flavoured with additives, tasteless pure ones are regulated. Women kill males as they can do best. In the womb. Half a million annually. "UuUuuUh doesn't count"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:42 AM
4

Don't care. Women are incapable of sufficient violence against adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:28 AM
6

It is simply using the statistics we have on hand to take precautions. Women file the majority of discrimination and harrassment lawsuits, and 80-90+% of those are thrown out as baseless nonsense. I have to take precaution and start a company that doesn't hire women, because I don't have time, nerves, or money to deal with these tangible costly risks. Oh wait, I can't; it's illegal. We think women are less violent because every shred of data we have says...women are less violent. Despite constit…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 09:40 AM
1

AUAT. All Unicorns Are Taken. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/pst_10-05-21_unpartnered_adults-0-3-png/
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 08:51 AM
3

"Church" is not "men"; there is no significant long-term gender difference in pro-life/choice attitudes: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2016/03/22/women-generally-are-more-religious-than-men-but-not-everywhere/ https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2026/03/12/do-abortion-attitudes-differ-by-gender/pp_2026-3-12_abortion_2-01/ women have pretty much made it impossible AI slop machine, in which country have women made routine circumcision of boys pretty much impossible? "There is no country…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:25 AM
0

https://www.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ko138w/mortality_in_relation_to_sex_in_the_affluent/ Roughly 95% of abortions are elective.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 04:54 AM
1

"If feminism asserts that bodily integrity, autonomy, and fundamental human rights are essential components of gender equality, it follows that these must be afforded to all genders without discrimination. Historically, there have been few feminists who have made this connection" From your first link. "...a peculiar reluctance also exists within feminist scholarship to interrogate the practice of male circumcision... Consequently, whereas other interventions... figure prominently in feminist acc…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 08:28 PM
-1

to actual governments Great point. List three countries off the top of your head that banned routine infant circumcision for both genders. Abortion is not a right. I checked.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:42 PM
3

like their ability to study science wasn’t intentionally impeded by those men No, it wasn't, and men to this day keep making women's lives better; their achievements just less often have a single name attached to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 04:00 AM
2

If you mean men acknowledging women for non-sexual attributes, Marie Curie remains to this day the only woman - AND the only PERSON - to win two scientific Nobel prizes in different fields (awarded by presumably ever-sexist boys' club of Nobel Committees in 1903 and 1911); Emmy Noether was praised by Albert Einstein himself for describing and proving conservation laws in general relativity; Margaret Cavendish and Mary Shelley are widely considered mothers of science fiction (recent Del Toro adap…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:58 AM
0

I have many cool dudes. James Young Simpson, Ignaz Philipp Semmelweis, Louis Pasteur, Joseph Lister, Lawson Tait, Ernst von Bergmann, James Blundell, Karl Landsteiner, Sahachiro Hata, Alfred Bertheim, Paul Ehrlich, James Leonard Corning, Robert Andrew Hingson, Waldo B. Edwards, Vincent du Vigneaud, Ferdinand Adolf Kehrer, Max Sänger, and Hermann Johannes Pfannenstiel; all contributed to maternal mortality falling by two orders of magnitude from early-19th century baseline, you are very welcome, …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:34 AM
6

We have equal rights, which is awesome. False; women have more rights than men, but okay, long story for another day. I’ve not seen a single indicator that most men like women for anything unrelated to sex. You can read an interview with the guy that invented HPV vaccine. He just keeps talking how he is thankful for the opportunity, that this task fell on his lap, that he had enough willpower and time to actually see this work completed, and how glad he is that less African women will die of cer…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 03:12 AM
7

The necessity of relying on men https://www.bgsu.edu/content/dam/BGSU/college-of-arts-and-sciences/NCFMR/documents/FP/FP-13-13.pdf "The highest peaks [of women never getting married] occurred in 1880 and in 2011 when 31% and 29%, respectively, of women were never married." [Figure 2] You may look up historical records and make sure that 31% of women in 1880, in fact, did not die of starvation. "Women just had to marry cuz no jerbs" is a myth; staying never married as a woman was always variation…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 06:04 PM
8

I will keep tapping this sign until it sinks in: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/pst_10-05-21_unpartnered_adults-0-3-png/ While your conjecture might also be true, "Women no longer have to depend on men economically, that aspect of society has changed" is a popular myth. Women still appreciate free stuff and ability not to work, and it's well-confirmed by quite recent objective data.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 12:08 PM
2

Lets say you were a woman Depends what type of a woman. If I was among the 61% of women who believe all this nonsense: all the cards are stacked against you: physically weaker, dealing with a monthly cycle, most likely to get murdered and/or raped by your partner, being expected to do most of the household chores, going through pregnancy, giving birth, postpartum, having to deal with misogyny... I'd get everything that makes me bleed or pregnant surgically carved out, order a custom-made chastit…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/26 10:28 AM
0

Is Superman a Jew? I am not fangirling over fictional biographies or lineages of fictional characters (even if Jesus existed, the New Testament version of his life - that became the basis for European law and custom for the next 1000+years - is definitely fictionalized). OP said "the patriarchy... basically coerced women to be submissive to ... (later in life) their adult sons. Women were basically property with no control of their lives." I am waiting on the evidence. This Jesus fella happens t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 06:13 PM
1

Canon law (the closest we have to codified European version of "The Patriarchy") is based on Vulgate, not "actually".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 05:41 PM
-3

the patriarchy, which basically coerced women to be submissive to their fathers, husbands and (later in life) their adult sons Please remind me a book, a chapter, and a verse where Jesus said, "women later in life, submit to your adult sons", it must have slipped my mind. Okay, if you can't, remind me a law or a court decision proclaiming that women later in life should submit to their adult sons. Or are you just making up complete nonsense as you go? Most men are not more intelligent or capable…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:46 PM
1

Red pill's argument is "All women are like that, don't get married, get a vasectomy".
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 08:26 AM
1

False analogy. (NotAll) women's argument is "bad men should not exist". (NotAll) men's argument is "bad things women do should not be legal or come with enforceable bonuses". Would have been the right analogy if anyone who matters unironically argued that since red flags are easy to spot, there is no need for criminal laws against rape and abuse. The only adjacent argument I encountered, supported, and made, is that rape should be strictly criminal and unsettlable.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/26 02:46 AM
4

Holding hands, eye contact, cuddling, discussing unsolved problems of theoretical physics while naked in bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/26 09:17 AM
4

Historically "traditional" men didn't want their wives to work because they didn't want them to be financially independent. What kind of "historically" (area, time period, community), how do you know exactly what those people wanted, and how do you extrapolate it so freely on current realities? I mean, I know the answer to the latter two: because you believe men to be innately universally morally inferior, but without these details there is nothing to debate. "Historically traditional" pre-Civil…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/26 09:40 AM
4

In the past when having resources was seen as the most important goal for a woman looking for a husband sure. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/pst_10-05-21_unpartnered_adults-0-3-png/ "In the past". Yes, feminism gave women the opportunity to seek and choose men out of genuine sympathy, attraction, and connection. No, women have not taken this opportunity. Your idealistic worldview is directly contradicted by o…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 01:53 PM

In the past when having resources was seen as the most important goal for a woman looking for a husband sure. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-partner/pst_10-05-21_unpartnered_adults-0-3-png/ "In the past"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/26 08:51 AM

Attention from people who think you are subhuman is not a thing because NSDAP got disbanded in 1945. Inb4 "Uuuh TRP says women are children!" - so? Children are human, not subhuman. The attention men get--- even if small is genuine and respectful for the most part. Out of maybe 20 women approaching me randomly in my lifetime, 18 demanded free labor or money. Out of ... maybe five? people to randomly compliment my appearance, three were men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 08:22 PM
3

marriage is becoming more about choosing a life partner Last time I checked, ~49% of women's first marriages did not survive to 20th anniversary (vs ~45% for men; Census). Last time I checked, an average woman's life lasts more than 20 years even when limited to adulthood. than duty Millions of men died as conscripts on the world's front lines. You are being gross and dishonest using the same word for some chick's mom nagging her for grandsons. and financial reasons being the main motivator. Unl…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 03:54 PM

Metal - No. Hip-hop - Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 08:33 PM

She is free to help with the parents, we can hang out, but I am not letting her enter my house or see me asleep.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 04:57 PM

Boys AGED 1 TO 6 die more often than girls because "smoking drinking not seeing the doctor". Fascinating_Spock.png. You forgot reckless driving. Have you seen what those boys do on the roads amirite.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 10:06 PM

This response addresses a source other than mine. I repeat: if the link did not work, you could have just said so. Now I am certain that you are just wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 10:02 PM

Not really My top comment contains a link to a sourced infographic supporting my argument. If for some reason the link does not work for you, just say so. If you refuse to debate evidence-based response to an evidence-based post, then you are wasting my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 09:45 PM

going by men on here, suffer primarily due to not getting hookups and casual sex This is a dating and relationships debate subreddit; when we (men) discuss something else, our posts get removed for off topic. Not yours tho. I have provided evidence not relevant to dating or relationships, you have ignored it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 09:36 PM

If you came here to argue that womanhood is a kind of disability, I'm pretty sure it's TOS violation for hate speech. All the numbers you have listed count only the living. Your argument only works under assumption that being alive with anxiety, depression, period cramps, or complicated pregnancy is worse than being dead.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 09:08 PM

The question was "acceptable", not "primary". Almost all guys I know can play at least one musical instrument, some can play several.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:38 AM

"Artists in 18 Major US Museums Are 85% White and 87% Male, Study Says" Art seems pretty emotionally expressive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:32 AM

Thought for the day: if someone only sees men "openly expressing their emotions" when men cry, this person is probably a psychopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 12:20 AM
18

Be alone. From your answers to other people: "she loves you with all her heart. She just doesn’t want sex." --- she can do it from across the street. We can barbecue every other saturday, she brings meat, I bring coal, desserts, and booze. "She wants to marry you. She wants to build a life with you. She just doesn’t want to have sex with you." --- ...half of everything I make (actually more but who counts), PLUS $18,000 for IVF. Please remind me what upsides were supposed to be. Does she do laun…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:45 PM
1

No because I'm not into anal. Yes if I was. ...This is insanely simple, huh.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 09:04 AM

large age gaps represent a tiny minority of relationships Depends on your definitions of large and tiny (Ba-Dum-Tsssssss) Women cannot date poorer men ON AVERAGE Yes they can; your assumption only works if everyone is obliged to be in a relationship (except 2-5% of men who exceed their female age-matches by raw numbers - there are slightly more boys born). Who is more likely to not be in a relationship among men and women? Which factors predict not being in a relationship the best for either?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 10:25 PM

It will take eternity to list literally everything, it will take way less time to list examples to the contrary, so I will focus on the fact most relevant to this discussion. Okay, the very few and in-between young women associating with older men do so out of material interest, litmus test evidence is that it's usually poorer younger women going after well-off older men. Are younger women pursuing younger men massively getting into relationships and marrying the guys who earn LESS than them ins…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 09:07 PM
3

Almost all - ALMOST ALL - relationships women have with men of their own age are also "not genuine attraction".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 08:20 AM
2

we are our bodies. That our personalities and character aren’t us. The notion that there is a part of you that isn't your body is not even supported by christianity (spiritism is a recognized heresy; resurrection of the dead is prophesized in their bodies in all Abrahamic religions; an intangible faint thingy flying out of a recently deceased is a cartoon trope). Brain is part of the body; if it gets poked at or gets sick, your personality and character will change, and usually to the worse. If …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 10:56 PM
7

Criminal women are more likely to have more kids, just like criminal men. LESS than criminal men. People are more likely to be reproductively successful when criminal; for men the effect is much higher (x1.65 for men; x1.31 for women). Both men and women are more likely to get prescribed anti-STI drugs when criminal; for men the effect is higher (despite commonly held assumption that women catch STIs from men easier than men from women; x1.4 for men, x1.3 for women). People are more likely to be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 06:05 AM
22

when you actually listen to how they define “asshole behavior,” it often just sounds like basic self respect, boundaries, and independence. I usually support this argument (women are attracted to assholes) by, for the sake of it, defining an asshole as a guy who is a convicted criminal. In the most feminist country on Earth, a person with 4 (half-)siblings is more likely than not to be fathered by a convict, and there are more babies an average convict man makes with non-convict women than a non…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 03:43 PM

A lot of guys with “no options” have a self-inflicted problem. And a lot also don't. A lot of women in abusive relationships have a self-inflicted problem. And a lot also don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/26 07:28 AM
2

I was pointing out that by this rough estimate, AI is advancing 3.6 thousand times faster than humans, which means Achilles will inevitably overtake the tortoise. Yes, GPT-4 and alike had internal process tokenized and completely detached from the written structure of the word; calling it "to fail at a basic thing" is like laughing at a congenitally blind person for not knowing "obvious" stuff about color.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 09:45 PM
3

Most humans think the universe is ruled by one or several gods, and have been since at least 11,000 years ago (40,000 by some estimates). The "strawberry test" is already fixed in some models. Took three years since its earliest reports, and less than two since it became viral.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 11:39 PM
5

Hm. I thank you for this question because it made me admit... I don't actually know. There is nothing-nothing-nothing I could point at in a random woman and say "This makes her a wife material". Even if she never shuts up about wanting to start a family and have kids and spend every free second in her first-and-only-love husband's embrace, who the hell knows, she can change her mind tomorrow. I knew borderline "Amish wife" cosplayers who turned out to be lying cheating whores, and tattooed punk …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 02:15 PM

We are discussing women choosing assholes. Red flag laws don't exist to protect school kids; they exist to let any random woman make the state take away her fuckbuddy's guns without court hearing because she said he might be abusive. This is not even derailing, it's dismounting the entire tracks. "Butbutbut those laws were made to protect schools!" - FIRST, EVERY fascist claims they protect something; second, No. "In 1999, Connecticut became the first state to enact a red flag law,[12] after a r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 09:07 AM
3

Why do men complain about women choosing assholes Because their solution to inevitable negative outcomes is always to limit all men in their rights (ban guns, red flag laws, prohibition, ...) and force those very same men to absorb the costs (more taxes). simultaneously shame men who are simps and treat women with kindness? Because when those women demand (essentially) more fascism, those simps respond with "Yes, darlings". "Uuuuh women also pay ta.." - Shut. Up.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 10:33 PM
-1

Married men spend more time than their wives doing wage work and house chores / child care combined in all years since 2004 and in most years since time use surveys were invented. Just like the myth of single unmarried women being the happiest sprouted out of a "scientist" unable to read definitions of a survey, the myth of women's "the second shift" sprouted out of a feminist "scientist"'s inability to read and understand definitions of "Personal care" and "Leisure". "I'd say anyone who denies …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 08:46 PM
2

you did bring up weapons And you apparently did not click the link or did not scroll down to my responses. women could've done it on a same level No they could'ven't. Women only perform close to men's level with PCPs and low-power bows; if they were lethal "on a same level" as actual firearms, you'd see them used by the military. With actual gunpowder-powered pistols (most popular in homicides) women are not even close. There are many women who stop doing harmful things to make their fetus healt…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 02:11 PM
3

"Checkmate, atheists". ONE. HUNDRED. PERCENT. of fetal poisoning and addiction are caused by women. I repeat my question, this time simultaneously more and less ironically: how do YOU plead? You could probably say here that it's logistically much harder for a man to induce opioid addiction into a fetus than for a woman. ...Yeees? Come on, you are this || close, continue and conclude the thought. Okay, don't, I'll do it for you. Most men could kill most women on the spot with bare fists. Men util…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 10:02 AM
4

Valid criticism of "men" would be alcoholism, smoking, reckless nutrient intake. Point at a random man on a street and he probably could do better in these departments. Violence, rape, abuse, murder, etc. are not "patterns in men’s behavior". Men invented pacifism, criminal justice system, and non-aggression principle. If you go around blaming men as a demographic for things that only a very small subset of very specific men do, "not all men" is a valid response. Back to women getting high on dr…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 09:25 AM
4

If I say “men do X,” the response is “not all men.” This cliché emerged out of women's insistence that exceptionally rare tragedies, such as husbands killing their wives, are ingrained systemic parts of the patriarchal fabric of society by design. In reality, while roughly 3-4 times a day a man kills his female intimate partner in the US, a woman has an abortion every 30 seconds, or gives birth to a newborn with opioid withdrawal every 25 minutes. If "the fabric of society" was truly "patriarcha…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 09:19 PM

Could your stance towards fashion ... be part of the reason people you want aren't drawn to you? Most people I adore don't hang out with me either because I have permanent scarcity of free time, or because they have it as well. One of my buddies is currently busy getting a second higher education in psychology so she can better raise her three children with autism, the other is raising her granddaughter to catch the time window before she hits teen crisis and decides that hanging out with granny…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 08:47 PM

What does your ideal woman dress like? I don't rate a woman's "idealness" by what color or shape of a mass-produced piece of fabric she chose to cover herself from chilly wind and scorching sun, but I respect a woman who moves around in something that she doesn't need to change out of if she suddenly urgently needs to climb (no rings), run 100 yards (no high heels), safely dodge a rapidly moving whatever (no piercing), etc. Bonus points for not wearing bunion inducers on her feet. What values do…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 05:44 PM
10

There’s that AI generated pic going around where a man is walking down the street with a robot woman laughing and holding hands while a (human) woman sits on the street like a homeless person crying about being “replaced.” Went to look up out of morbid curiosity; the woman "sitting like a homeless person" has a sign at her feet: "6ft tall 6 pack abs 6 figures". How is this supposed to work? A home date is cheaper; a wedding is some woman coercing a guy to automatically assume legal responsibilit…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 01:13 AM

Census, 2011: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/2011/chldsu11.pdf Percent of aggregate due [child support] actually received: Custodial fathers: 54.6%; custodial mothers: 63.2%. Amount received: None: Custodial fathers: 32%; custodial mothers: 25%. Same stuff in year 2013. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/2013/chldsu13.pdf In year 2015. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/demo/tables/families/2015/chldsu15.pdf In year 2017. https://ww…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/26 09:11 PM
2

Went to my home town to visit buddies and relatives when I was... 25 I think? We're having dinner, telling stories, having fun; at some point one of them looks around and says, "Fellas, look, all divorcees here!" Everyone laughed. I laughed the least and then started thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 03:08 PM
3

Social taxes are non-deductible, non-custodial mothers are worse at paying child support than non-custodial fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/26 12:32 AM
6

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1sxhl6q/men_and_society_want_tangible_value_from_women/oippy6x/ Not repeating myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:06 AM
4

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257644181_Marriage_and_the_Economic_Well-Being_at_Older_Ages You can start here. "among continuously married men, about 60 percent of total wealth, including Social Security, pension and housing and non-housing wealth, comes from future claims on Social Security and pension wealth. For unmarried males (after one divorce) this percentage is 65 and is 67 for unmarried (after one divorce) females. Social Security and pension wealth is 74 percent of total wea…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 10:04 AM
6

I said nothing about providing value to kids, my only point relevant to kids was presumption of paternity, it's a different thing, look up my other comment explaining it to other confused woman who sees absolutely anything and starts getting a knee-jerk "maelz dont wanna feed their own sprogs" reaction. Also, women are worse than men at paying child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:16 AM
6

Instead of thinking of it like "providing tangible value to woman's kids" Who are you quoting? Responding to a wrong comment?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:11 AM
4

The ones "having to use help" are NOT the ones having done the "unpaid labour". The disproportionate demographic relying on unearned retirement benefits are not housewives; it's single, never-married, childless women who "sacrificed family for career" and failed at both, having spent decades at some entry-level nonsense job with entry-level nonsense salary (Google "PIA bend points" for details). Housewives are often not qualified for workers' retirement benefits at all because they don't have su…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 09:10 AM

The answer was that women are kinda doing fine at the Olympics in PCP rifles at 10m distance, but the current Olympic world record by points in finals is held by a man. Oh oh oh and sorry to burst the bubble, but PCPs are definitionally not firearms.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:59 AM
-1

None of this is relevant to anything in my comment; the majority of "social support" is retirement benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:24 AM
13

Everyone is forced to pay taxes and at the end of the day Between 1/4 and 1/5 of prime-age women don't work, vs ~10% of prime-age married men. Slightly short of 2 women work part-time per 1 man working part-time. it would be unkind to essentially kick them while they're down Social security OASDI contributions are capped and non-deductible, everyone making $184,500 or above pays exactly the same sum, be it a father of 7 working three jobs or a childless CEO. In divorce, it's often 50/50 in terms…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 01:03 AM
18

are mad that women want tangible value too Hard disagree. I'm highly displeased that the demographic of women most reliant on state assistance are the never-married and the divorcees, while the absolute champion taxpayer demographic is married men. Thus, men are forced at the state's gun point to provide tangible value to women who don't provide tangible value to them, at the expense of themselves and women who do. Similar injustice happens in things like division of assets in divorce or presump…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:28 PM
2

AI slop machine, give me the list of first names of the best American shooters by different ratings in the last 5 years. USPSA: Christian, Christian, Aaron, Christian, Christian. Steel Challenge: Jesse, KC, KC, KC, KC. Precision Rifle: Morgun, Ben, Austin, Other Austin, Austin. Olympic Skeet: Vincent, Vincent, Vincent, Vincent, Conner, Austen. Olympic Trap: William, Derrick Olympic Rifle: Sagen, Mary, William 13 men, 3 women. Edit: forgot - NRA: Nils, Greg, Tim. 16 men, 3 women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 09:51 PM
3

To all the people believing that women are just as capable of using firearms, but housework is a terrible disproportionate burden, a humble reminder: there are 15 Olympic medal events for shooting, but only one for mopping.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 11:04 AM
2

Family history of clinical insanity also isn't much of a choice. Say 1% chance it was a medical necessity. Say 2ish% chance he got it done as a personal preference for whatever reason. Leaves 97% chance that his parents think this is either normal, or necessary thing to do to infants. Do I want my sister risking pregnancy with these people's grandchild? - Not really.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 04:28 PM
1

Imagine it's your sister asking that advice or something If she was relatively attractive, I'd thank her for asking me and tell her to shuffle around her orbiters and pick the one that cooks better. After "What? I don't have any orbiters!" I'd start to list them by names, and then she'd laugh in my face and never bother me with this question again. In astronomically impossible case she actually listens and doesn't laugh and politely says that unfortunately these guys are really just friends and …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/26 09:22 AM
3

Why do so many men have a victim mentality when it comes to romance and dating? Cuz we got victimized through betrayal by people who said they loved us, simple, next? I don't blame women for not desiring me. Same here; I blame two specific women who cheated on me. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it happened twice. get bitter and withdraw and I don't understand why Because I'd rather have it never happen to me again, obviously, simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 01:19 PM

https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/u8ok2w/oc_the_gender_gap_in_us_sat_scores_over_the_years/ https://np.reddit.com/r/ACT/comments/8tfnun/average_high_school_gpa_and_act_scores_sorted_by/ Looks like reality and data to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 12:57 PM

A glorious comment; rarely do we perceive so many screeching lips and burned butts at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 12:48 PM

I don't want "female treatment", I want equality. Constitution and international law say equality is a given by the fact of one's creation, not bestowed upon for agreeableness, non-disruptiveness, social tact, and therapy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 12:12 PM
4

Getting old is awesome. I am no longer judged for sleeping with socks half-on.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/26 09:35 AM

and even this latter difference is not statistically significant Again, send a paper with the data bc i dont take your word for it. "Never-married men and women have similar views on this question: 55% of men and 50% of women say they would like to get married someday. (The difference is not statistically significant.)" - Put this sentence into Google and click the first link. Kids don't happen without sex/intercourse They do since 1953, but okay, why are women so bad at paying child support? Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 05:34 PM

Look at the study showing that single unmarried women are the happiest dynamic. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/11ecaky/the_widespread_research_declaring_that_women_are/ https://archive.is/2025.05.16-120645/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2019/6/4/18650969/married-women-miserable-fake-paul-dolan-happiness Also, men don't dump wives with cancer at x8 rate, intimate partner homicide is not the leading cause of death for pregnant women, and older men dump their wives with worse…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 03:43 PM

women initiate >70% of divorces Men stay single, women marry and then divorce. Women younger than 44 are also more, not less, likely than their male counterparts to remarry. Men prefer to marry and have a family eventually more than women do Never-married men and women have similar views on this question: 55% of men and 50% of women say they would like to get married someday. (The difference is not statistically significant.) - Pew Research Center, emphasis mine. Men outnumber women by a large m…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 01:38 PM
2

If every civilization is also a patriarchy, how these two are not synonyms? A household patriarchy or an Orthodox Christian ruling body called "patriarchy" is not "civilization", but these are not what feminists mean when they say "the patriarchy".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:31 AM
2

Cool; show me a civilization that isn't also a patriarchy. Should be easy. "LawL"
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 11:19 AM
0

I am not selling you marriage, I am watching over facts. First: no primary sources. "Comparatively, the highest rate of infidelity is found among men in their 70s (26%), and it is still prevalent in men 80 and beyond (24%)." Second, no. The General Social Survey's question reflected in these numbers is “Have you EVER had sex with someone other than your husband or wife while you were married?” (emphasis mine.) Marriage just seems like a trap to being an unpaid domestic slave for a man and kids F…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:36 AM
5

For most men, women's attraction as a contributing factor to their lives is a rounding error at 20, 30, 40, or 50. Trying to put a rounding error on a timeline will give you a rounding error on a timeline. You can as well tune an old car's radio to a vacant frequency and try to hear an alien message there. Noise has no meaning.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 08:56 AM

single life is more beneficial... your statistic is useless since it excludes a lot. There are more never-married men than women, there are more ever-married women than men. I am thankful to every never-married woman for saving her potential future ex-husband from going through divorce, but realistically men do it themselves even better. take care of the kids - another task men should be able to do but are usually worthless for. Men do more child care than ever. Women did not notice. There is st…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 07:57 AM

Yes. And couples divide labor the way they do NOT because they claim or try to prove the opposite. So telling them "Um guys, you know wage income is a survival skill, right?" is irrelevant and redundant. Same goes for chores. Men do less of them in marriage because they already disproportionately sleep less and die of exhaustion and neurosis. Not because god told them it's women's job.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 09:57 PM

4/4 in 1982 (women sole/primary). Peaked in 2012 (7/10).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 09:49 PM

In childless couples, men are still 2.4 times more likely to be breadwinners. Just World Fallacy is a fallacy for a reason. If women spend more time at home, it only makes sense for them to do the majority of chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:56 PM

Women under 30 are now outearning men in major cities. No they are not. What was the number of female bread winners in 1980 compared to today? In most years since the records began, men poured more hours into wage labor and unpaid labor combined than their wives. Today, 6% of marriages have sole, and 10% more have primary female breadwinner. So it's rounding error then, rounding error now.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:07 PM

You mean 55% of marriages have a male who makes more. No; 55% of marriages have a husband who earns more than 60% of household income. In 23% of marriages, it's 100% of income. You also know this includes older people right? No; this specific number is limited to 25-64 age bracket. When all ages are included, it's closer to 40% of men bringing in 100% of household income. So for the 45% of marriages where there is equal pay or she makes more It's not 45%.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:03 PM
-3

The constant obsession in the manosphere and red pill space with finding a woman to cook and clean etc for you is honestly non-existent. As an adult you should be able to cook and clean for yourself. As an adult you also should be able to earn for yourself, yet 55% of marriages have a male breadwinner. Imagine how stupid it would look if I came here saying that wage income is a survival skill not a gender role. It's been more than 2 centuries since Adam Smith explained like everyone is 5 why div…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 07:43 PM
2

I wrote an honest response and it got "removed by Reddit" in less than a minute. The topic is undebatable. Either Reddit's bot brigade will snipe anything that steps out of The Dogma, or some simp is standing watch over the thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 08:32 AM
2

so it's highly likely More like a coin toss. Men die early enough that many (if not most) still can wipe their own ass on the day of their death. Plus, it's been what... oh, FOREVER since a woman can just get up and leave, it's not a crime. She will not "end up"; she will choose to help him if he needs it, or choose not to.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:30 PM
3

To 22%, only for women (to 35% for men).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:12 AM
3

What do you even mean by "women's marriages"? Failure rate for women and men is somewhat different (due to age bracketing); a woman's first marriage is when she is not remarrying but her fiancé may be. You may ask AI slop machine for details and primary sources; I am somewhat in a rush. Feminism didn't promise anything to men. False. For details, you may open Mary Wollstonecraft's "Vindication" ("Would men but generously snap our chains, and be content with rational fellowship instead of slavish…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:06 PM
3

ask AI slop machine what the chance of a woman's first marriage not surviving to 20th anniversary is in your country. The average is around 16 years ...chances are not measured in years. If you have many very short marriages and many very long ones, the average would still be in the middle even though most marriages are either much longer or shorter. "Half not surviving to 20th anniversary" is NOT "average" marriage, it's average women's, FIRST marriage in the US among women aged 15-44 (i.e. wid…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 12:41 PM
0

it does not mean they weren't in love Yes. Maybe it's because I live outside the US Be a darling and ask AI slop machine what the chance of a woman's first marriage not surviving to 20th anniversary is in your country. Ireland, India, and Malta are exceptions. 30-40% is OECD average.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 10:23 AM
6

Half of women's first marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary; it's your choice if you stop being friends with guys whose wives dumped them, and you don't have a superpower allowing to scan for sincerity of someone's feelings. Sorry to burst the bubble.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:32 AM
17

Maybe 1 in 10 men will ever meet a woman "who actually loves" him. Let's even be generous and assume it's 1 in 3. Out of those, ~2/3rds will filter out due to logistics (moving to another city, etc.) ~2/3rds of the remainder will just "flicker out" and lose interest for whatever reason (the list of icks is infinite). So yes, for 1 in 27 men who will actually meet their one true lasting love, losing her because he wanted to roleplay having a harem is dumb as Hell.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 09:41 PM
3

https://np.reddit.com/r/copypasta/comments/huk5kf/why_are_you_gay_interview_copypasta_found_in/
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:50 PM

"this page is intentionally left blank" is a self-refuting statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 08:38 PM

I actually talked to a therapist to tell how my family history could make a solid basis for a family curse myth and to ask if I even should risk propagating them further (the "curse" and the history).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/26 06:48 PM
4

It was historically recognized that a husband can plea insanity if he beat his wife caught in the act with another man on their conjugal bed. This is what Justinian's code was about, and this is where the feminist myth of "it was legal for husbands to beat wives" originates from. As a general rule, no civilized system of law or ethics justifies violence in revenge. I do not unequivocally condemn, denounce, or boycott anyone based on one-sided hearsay.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 05:31 PM
1

"40% is as much as or more than 60%" is wrong, not technically inaccurate. I am not holding some sort of a grudge, but I am also not wasting time debating genetics with a person incapable of admitting an honest arithmetic mistake caused by not reading their own source. Also don't "bro" me, boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 02:18 PM
-1

Only after 45. Used to be after 25 in the 1960s. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2014/11/14/chapter-2-the-demographics-of-remarriage/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 11:41 AM
2

your number quibble is wrong on top of being irrelevant No it isn't. The 45% is 29% egalitarian (each spouse earns 40-60% of household income) plus 16% breadwinner-wife (wife earns more than 60%). Therefore, in 45% of US marriages, wives DO NOT earn as much as or more than husbands, by definitions of "as much as" and "more than". Until you understand this simple truth, that you have made a very simple rudimentary mistake in your wording, discussing genetics is pointless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/26 08:34 AM
5

In 45% of current U.S. marriages, the wife earns as much as or more than her husband False; in 45% of current US marriages, the wife earns at least 40% of income by both spouses, not "as much as or more". Same PRC points out that a) even among childless married couples, men are 2.4 times more likely than women to be primary or sole breadwinner, b) financial vulnerability is among the strongest predictors that a man, but not a woman, is single, and median income of partnered men is almost twice a…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 09:55 PM

All you hear online is men complaining about dating and women. Not really, unless you stick to RP spaces and ignore literally anything else. With all the stuff women have to go through in dating... Men go into the dating market offering nothing Women don't have to go through anything. Stay single. men's biggest complaint is women rejecting them Not really, my biggest complaint is 2% of children raised by oblivious non-fathers. Within this day, 200 US women will allow a man other than their husba…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 11:45 AM

to be aloone loooks (her loooks match) Treat yoourself tooo a new keyboooooard!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 07:58 AM
1

Women make no moral choices when following their female nature within the system that denies existence of said nature. I agree with the rest; TRP should have been more "feminist" in its application of language. TRP should have had its own bell hooks to throw at critics as a shut-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 01:45 PM
11

Why do you think men should change anything about wider society when presumably they are its primary beneficiaries?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 11:33 AM
3

Out of every male comment (which are the majority) you were the only two who said something happened to you Men are not the protected group, our post histories can be cross-matched with mentions of events on other social media to deperson us for wrongthink. It's a mental load to maintain an index of stuff we have already mentioned here on Reddit but haven't on other platforms. I had a random woman demand I help her pay rent because shes ay mothah. I said "No," she asked, "Why," I did not want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:25 AM
18

You're making a good point, and I mean it sincerely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:23 PM
7

The full argument is, "Not all men are rapists/abusers/..., therefore your (feminists') initiative to take away men's rights and institute mass profiling, surveillance, social engineering, and pre-justice on the basis of sex would be unjust, anti-equality, and regressive". Feminists mockingly saying "Hahahahah, he said Not All Men!" means "Shut up, we are taking away your rights, freedoms, and toys anyway." Of course, we have moved forward since then and know that women are comparatively almost …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 04:22 PM

"being VERY physically fit" cannot be "the bare minimum" by definition of "very" and "minimum". FIRST sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/26 11:01 AM
2

individualality is veryry importatant.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 04:35 PM
3

Polyamory, as in “men should have multiple wives and cheat as they please” ... So why advocate for a system that would make that problem even worse? Accelerationism, and "Simps Must Suffer"; this assumption only works if those women don't sleep with anyone else. About two percent of children are raised by men who mistakenly believe themselves to be the fathers; an average child takes 32 nuts to conceive, and if any sort of worst-ever condom is used, the number jumps to 3200 (add another zero if …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/26 01:53 PM
10

generally leads to women filing for divorce. Most cheaters reconcile, most men dumped by women are not cheaters. Women lose sex drive for their partners due to familiarity faster than men for theirs due to aging. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Factors-modifying-the-relation-between-sex-partnership-duration-and-sexual-motivation_fig1_247161055?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19 The same holds true for college-aged couples. https://www.researc…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 08:32 AM
5

Mermaids are just a fantasy. 10+y age gap marriages are 7 times more common than gay marriages. I'm all for making it illegal for people to get intimate outside +-6months of their own age; most women's legal dating pools would collapse and dry out, and it would be both hilarious to observe and good for understanding that the state has no place in bedroom. And age of consent to 24, age of marriage to 26 while we're at it. Almost all women don't like almost all men; almost everything you said appl…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 01:56 AM
3

I can't take this post seriously or give a serious answer, so I offer a hypothetical for a hypothetical. A young man in the days before everyone had a GPS navigator in their pocket approached a cute young woman and asked her for directions in a quite crowded place. "I AM NOT HAVING SEX WITH YOU, EVER!!!" the girl shouted angrily for everyone to hear. The guy shook his head in confusion, and the girl continued: "Excuse me, I am majoring in psychology, and my assignment was to journal people's rea…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/26 08:17 AM
3

Actual, tangible discrimination of schoolchildren resulting in lower college enrollment is more important than imaginary discrimination of adults. Discrimination is already illegal; you generally can't make it twice-illegal, ne bis in idem. By some estimates 90-95% of discrimination lawsuits filed by women are thrown out as completely baseless; even a won court case costs employers money; if women stop creating additional costs and risks for employers by filing so many bullshit discrimination la…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:45 PM
3

Among the age bracket most likely to divorce? - Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 08:32 AM
4

If a woman exchanges her exclusivity and commitment for performance, that's settling and tolerance, not desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:00 PM
10

This post is the perfect opportunity for you to clash with those who insist that men were hoarding all the rights for themselves for the last 6,000 years. Of course, the reality is that men invented civil rights and then human rights as a solid, humane, and god-fearing (let's be honest, religion played a huge part in this) argument why there should be no special interest groups (in historical context, no aristocracy). Since feminists want women to be the new aristocracy, opposing them aligns per…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 08:26 AM
8

I was so hoping that this post would finally address enormous explosive breeding rates of male violent criminals...
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:50 AM
6

There is a persistent blue pill myth that women file for divorces at higher rates than men just because men are lazy slobs who delegate all the paperwork to their wives. No, women demand more divorces even when you survey them directly, not just follow a paper trail. By paper trail, women filed for the majority of divorces at least since 1860s.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:49 AM
3

Neither. Women just don't like guns. There is no actual connection between a terrible ex and women not liking guns, and taking away guns will not solve anything, or stop women from complaining. Many countries did exactly that, and women are still complaining about terrible exes. In Japan you can be thrown in jail for riding a bicycle with a kitchen knife in its basket, even if you are a woman. And women are still complaining.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 07:47 AM
5

Half of women's first marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary, and 68% of divorces are demanded by women (no, not just filed for). Which means that among men preselected into marriage by women, among men SPECIFICALLY preselected by INDIVIDUAL women into marriage WITH THEM, 1 in 3 is some sort of insufferable. The NECESSARY conclusion is either "Something is wrong with men", or "Something is wrong with women's preselection". If a man has a bad relationship, the take away is “see how horrid wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 10:21 PM
4

A woman's appearance/physicality has more to do with PeRsOnAlItY than a man's wallet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:38 PM
0

An average prime-age woman on an average day has 15%-25% chance of being on her period. If she isn't, this damn thing starts quite randomly. BUT. societal pressure, stress and responsibilities, dating and relationship, emotional support etc Pre-menopausal women consistently score higher on neuroticism. So anything that happens with them objectively can be multiplied at least by 2 to account for how they perceive and process it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 08:09 AM
1

That’s why it always stands out to me when some men talk about how easy it is for women to “vet better.” It sounds very book smart. Like someone who understands the theory, but hasn’t really been in those situations. My classmate had an entire elite school full of athletic and educated and full of hobbies future businessmen and top-tier specialists and maybe even politicians to choose from, she still chose to knowingly give her virginity to a neo-Nazi. My mother let a known former criminal autho…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 09:25 PM
2

Before the manosphere /TRP, it was christianity, and politicians, and husbands, and fathers, and traditions, and Lord Blackstone's Commentary on English Common Law prescribing beating one's wife with a rod no thicker than one's thumb (which literally never happened), and Jus Primae Noctis (which also most likely literally never happened). We have literal centuries of detailed self-confessed "Men Aint Shit" declarations by women made centuries before "the red pill" and "the manosphere" became a t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:46 PM

Water is wet; more news after ad break
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 11:12 AM

I wanted to make a post based on "The Feminine Mystique", how this is a bad book, how it falls in line quite well with the rest of feminist dogma that men are the class enemy of women, and how none of its predictions came true, some came sideways, and almost all came backwards; is Betty Friedan, the founder of NOW and the godmother of American second-wave feminism, feminist enough for you? Or is it only bell hooks because while being exceptionally stupid, she was also kinda pro-men, so shut up d…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 07:46 AM
3

Expectation and variance are two different things, when you notice a pattern you are observing an expectation; people who don't understand the difference or think one excludes the other should not vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/26 01:28 PM
9

I don't know how you could live with yourself just letting it happen. Simple, you pretend it's all their own fault. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ko138w/mortality_in_relation_to_sex_in_the_affluent/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/26 03:52 PM
1

Well-maintained car is visible, husbands do more housework and child care than ever, and for every extra hour of housework they necessarily delegate to their wives not to die of exhaustion, they bring home triple its market value. Nurses are basically not-doctors artificially forced into having medical benefits while their male patients get worse outcomes than women, teachers consistently release boys into the world with lower grades than girls, non-custodial fathers are better than mothers at p…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 03:20 PM
-4

Women have done a lot of necessary, invisible work If the work is invisible then it does not exist. the idea that men are natural protectors doesn’t really match what we actually see in behavior Last time I checked, despite constituting only 2/3rds of US gun owners, men were 12 to 14 times more likely to commit justifiable homicide with a firearm. You don't see it everyday because gladly, it doesn't happen every day. But that's probably higher share of men than share of women is among nurses. It…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:16 PM

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 02:03 PM

I am against Sharia in all forms; just don't cosplay a clicky fruity traffic light at my workplace. I try to work there.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 08:07 AM
9

Observe who attracts the most women? The ultra-rich and violent criminals. women have rich lives wit different goals and hobbies and commitment to art and literature, and rich inner universes Retired women way out of dating game attend stupid crafts and hobbies workshops much more often; "Artists in 18 Major US Museums Are 85% White and 87% Male, Study Says"; "Between 1901 and 2024, the Nobel Prize in Literature has been awarded to 121 individuals, consisting of 103 men and 18 women". they have …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/26 07:09 AM
1

Not yet, but confirmed at risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:57 PM
2

This is no secret, but I happened to learn it the hard way. No more kebab for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:46 PM

Viking burials long assumed to be male warriors have repeatedly turned out to be female on DNA analysis. ~5 burial sites containing ~10 remains that were previously... well, misgendered. Out of tens of thousands of known viking remains. Roughly as many as men mistaken for women because they were buried with keys and utensils. More risk-taking, more competitive drive, more dominance-seeking Louis Pasteur pioneered lab-produced vaccines, inventing both attenuated and inactivated variants; 17 years…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 10:42 PM
4

No worldbuilding spreadsheet, sorry, I hoped you'd appreciate theory of machines and mechanisms more, and I come up with these things by just looking at latest legal initiatives and thinking could they be either just less cucked, or cucked the other way. Federal government intervenes to force employers to provide private, lockable, non-bathroom breast pumping rooms to women workers - this is clearly something that requires intervention of people with power to declare wars, and will not at all ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 09:16 PM
5

Food is sold at a discount to women if rich in micro-elements and to men if rich in protein and slow carbs; oversalted, overstarched, and over-oxalated food is banned; pull-up bars in sedentary workplaces and resting couches in physically demanding ones are mandatory; in non-time-sensitive occupations employers are obliged to allow employees begin their work day at time of their choice within at least 4-hour fork (say, anywhere between 7 and 11AM); public boys' schools are available, start class…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:36 PM
0

Her input to the household is compensated by his input to the household, "SHE is compensated" is your assumption that I debunked in my top comment. Which means you are arguing with yourself and I dare not to distract; have a nice day.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 07:42 PM
0

No, I just explained why, and people disagreeing with me are counting chores as service to the husband, and not as taking care of the wife's own house.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 06:08 PM
0

Hours they're compensated for, yes? No, hours total, compensated and uncompensated. Husbands earn almost exactly 2/3rds of median family budget and do slightly more than 1/3rd of unpaid labor. At a higher rate than the wives, on average? Yes, on average women don't marry men who are weaker, dumber, or less ambitious than themselves. the (unpaid) extra labor of wives is actually compensated at a higher rate than they make at their actual jobs?? No; that wives' contribution to the household in for…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 05:11 PM
0

"Women don't earn for families, they occupy positions of employment provided by force from the state to get allowance on divorce lawyers." Scare-quotes and italics to signify that I am responding to an absurd claim with an absurd claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:11 PM
1

Your non-knowledge of "all the other behavior" and "facets of life" is entirely fine-sculpted by propaganda from ministry of oil-rich invasions. If I were to be mind-swapped with a random person from Iran or Yemen, I'd pray to Allah that it's a married woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 04:00 PM
0

I have several people in the comments already losing their collective shit over the word "compensated"; read their comment chains. Obviously both are contributing to the household. Husbands work more hours total in every year since 2003.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 03:58 PM
2

"Theocratic" countries are still gynocentric. Yemen is still gynocentric. Iran has literal network of state-sponsored girls' schools that raised the first woman to win Fields medal. Similarly, if the US or British or Canadian or Australian women think these are terrible patriarchies, why don't they move to Iceland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, or Finland?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 02:32 PM
-1

And yes, wives are providing services to their husbands. If wives are providing services to their husbands by looking after the house that they co-own and are primary heirs to, then the husbands are earning for the wives. I am glad that the word "compensated" is the only part that seems to cause disagreement. till isn't as much work as housewives If men did as much house work as housewives on top of breadwinning they would die of exhaustion.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/26 08:09 AM
-1

61% of women who see men as the class enemy (feminists) spread and repeat the false notion that basically all married women bring in half of the household's income (minus patriarchal penalties for women in workforce) and also do "the second shift" while the husband relaxes on a couch watching sports on TV and drinking beer. As this notion consists of two parts (time spent and "the pricing work"), it's only adequate to make a collective response to it with both parts addressed. Such men exist, bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 09:28 PM
2

I believe the conclusion should be "'Men Ain't Shit' is actually false; they're doing kinda fine, all things considered". Couples are doing surprisingly well in terms of division of labor, with average total workload discrepancy between married men and women being less than 1/10th of an hour in 3 years out of the last 6 with data.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:57 PM
1

I don't know where you're getting 1.21 hours per day from. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1en2rvj/american_time_use_survey_workload_vs_metime/ Here's the spreadsheet, source in the comment. 2023 Household activities / day, married, men/women: 1.81 / 2.73 Household member care: 0.60 / 0.92 Non-household member care: 0.22 / 0.15. (2.73 - 1.81) + (0.92 - 0.60) + (0.22 - 0.15) == 1.31 Oh thanks, I actually made a mistake; it's 1.31 and not 1.21. Important detail: ATUS surveys all indiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:32 PM
-4

You can't claim housewives are highly compensated when they aren't actually paid. Wives also aren't providing services to husbands. Both contribute to the household. And why do these threads always have an air of Neuroticism and seeing men as class enemy despite men doing more housework and child care than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:27 PM
1

You're trolling, I'm not biting. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1en2rvj/american_time_use_survey_workload_vs_metime/ Married people have higher workload (both genders), family is a sacrifice that both parties make. Average wife's sacrifice is not larger than average husband's, and men do more housework and child care than ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 07:18 PM
1

BLS Time Use Survey One-Screen Data Finder for American Time Use Survey, here's the spreadsheet although it goes only to 2023: https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1en2rvj/american_time_use_survey_workload_vs_metime/ I made it myself by requesting these data sets (codes in the table). For this post I recalculated domestic activities by combining household activities, care for household members, and non-household members for married only. The "Total workload" in the spreadsheet includes p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 04:48 PM
2

The difference is 3.9 hrs a week. His big sacrifice for her is less than half of the time she spends on the portion of domestic labor he generates? More like 4.6 (RichmondFed); the difference with wives is 1.38 hours per day (ATUS); while married men are at work, they don't generate domestic labor. You framed the compensation as monetary Comparison is crude and made for perspective and not rigorous accuracy. Hydrogen atom from your school textbook is also a lie; the electron is not a ball and it…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 04:30 PM
6

Being married does not mean stepping out of the workforce. Married women step out of the workforce because they choose so, they can afford it, and consider any corresponding risk adequate. They are not forced by their husbands. If you know a woman who is, you can call police on him for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:48 PM
2

I clicked the link but it just goes to your main post, which talks about averages. It should have gone to comment; sorry, old/new interface links may mismatch. Here's that comment's full text: The closest non-AI-slop estimate I know of that is already calculated is Pew report from 2023 (although it operates on older data): "Across all opposite-sex marriages in 2022, the median earnings for wives were $35,000 while husbands earned a median of $65,000." https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploa…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:09 PM
1

Lmao y'all love to act like single men don't have jobs. Nowhere near as much as married men. Not if you're gonna say some stupid shit, no. "Children that he decided to have out of his own free will" is "some stupid shit", you beat me to it, rude person. Still nothing to support the statement that domestic labor isn't unpaid. It's compensated. Wife's contribution to household (not service to husband) is compensated by husband's contribution to household.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 03:06 PM
2

Using an average Median non-AI-estimated here https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1sadrz2/the_average_hour_of_an_american_wifes_extra/odvozkh/ including people unemployed makes no sense 23% of wives have zero income; around 15% more work part time. This is not "the crazy edge".
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:33 PM
3

What tune? Married men already work more than married women (total, paid+unpaid)
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:31 PM
3

there is a guaranteed loss of hers https://np.reddit.com/r/EconomyCharts/comments/1n2itmv/the_gender_wage_gap_is_mostly_about_married_men/ There is some evidence that when employed, married women actually earn more than their single counterparts, but to be completely fair with you, last time I investigated its primary sources and methodology things were weird and shady. But yeh, this is the best I got; there's also a study on never-married women retirees actually being more reliant on state assi…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:29 PM
1

Dangerous jobs don't pay as well these days (on average; maritime salvage is still a goldmine), and despite constituting the majority of dangerous-job-doers, married men are actually somewhat less likely to apply for them than their single counterparts. An average breadwinner Joe's job is not necessarily physically dangerous, but almost always mentally taxing. No-one is paying anyone for nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:18 PM
4

Why isn't he looking after his house Because he is at work to pay mortgage so the house doesn't become bank's. children that he decided to have out of his own free will You don't want to go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 02:10 PM
5

He's being paid. She isn't receiving his pay. She is looking after her house and children that she decided to have out of her own free will. Yes. married men outpace single men in leisure https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1en2rvj/american_time_use_survey_workload_vs_metime/ False in all years at least since 2003.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:35 PM
2

The closest non-AI-slop estimate I know of that is already calculated is Pew report from 2023 (although it operates on older data): "Across all opposite-sex marriages in 2022, the median earnings for wives were $35,000 while husbands earned a median of $65,000." https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2023/04/Breadwinner-wives-full-report-FINAL.pdf (p.11) (65,000-35,000)/365 == $82 per day, $68 per wife-hour full, $48 per wife-hour prime-age. I relied on slop machine numbers beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:27 PM
3

Mean income (skewed by top earners), including non-working wives, then dividing by a time-use gap from a different group. If you use medians or compare like-for-like couples, that “cybersecurity wage” drops fast. "the estimate of excess wage brought by husband drops to $71 per day, or $59 per hour-general-pop, or $42 per hour-prime-age. Business analyst instead of senior software project manager." (from response to other user) There’s no actual transfer, no defined rate, no guarantee she even se…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 01:14 PM
4

"A service" is provided by trained professionals according to agreed upon quality standards. Men also do childcare and housekeeping, and more than ever. Retirement and investment funds are marital assets, inheritable and divisible in divorce. Lots of women waive their right to share of retirement plan in exchange for full ownership of the house.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:57 PM
11

The wives don't get the money as a wage, the husbands don't get child care and housekeeping as a service. But this is how gendered contributions of husbands and wives stack up against each other on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:28 PM
4

My queries to Google AI asisstant were: ""On average, what is the mean and median personal income for prime-age married American men and women? Please include the unemployed / not in labor force in the calculation. What is the source of this data?" After it gave me ranges, my next question was: "That’s a lot of numbers. I need clear, concise, and exact average values, down to the dollar." Here's the full list of links that the machine listed as its sources: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/202…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:19 PM
8

There is no time use survey category "time spent for your husband". It's different because if you get a hired professional and pay them for work, you get to sue them for underperformance, they don't stay in your house, and can't sue you for custody of your children.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:11 PM
7

Tell me you didn't bother to click without telling. No, they work more total.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:07 PM
1

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 12:07 PM
16

They are not truly working as housekeepers or childcare providers for random strangers as well, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:43 AM
8

Yes! For median income (if AI slop machine is to be believed - I'm too old and lazy to fact-check every number manually), the estimate of excess wage brought by husband drops to $71 per day, or $59 per hour-general-pop, or $42 per hour-prime-age. Business analyst instead of senior software project manager.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:42 AM
7

She is not "let in", the vast majority of family houses are marital property. She is a co-owner.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:35 AM
8

you will be expected to do more work for less money Husbands work more than wives. Not by much, but on average and consistently. women should definitely stop being in relationships with men "men outnumber women by a large margin among never-married adults (125 men for every 100 women), but men are outnumbered by women among previously married adults (71 men for every 100 women)." We're waiting.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 11:16 AM
4

And I've never heard of a man with full control of the house that his wife cleans but doesn't use.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:53 AM
2

While some men spend their excess earnings on themselves, almost all wives take care of their own house and children. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 10:41 AM

People don't get it but back then you had nobody. There were not many handymen to help fix your house, your husband had to do that. There was no Doordash, no Uber. Especially not in the countryside..People needed their families to survive in their day-to-day life. In context, I am rightfully assuming that you are not talking about parents, siblings, and cousins. "At 31.5% the percentage of women who were never married in 2022 was nearly equivalent to the rate seen in 1900 (31.3%)." https://www.b…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/26 06:59 AM
1

Men earn more AND take care of the kids already. You are complaining that men don't make all the money and change all the diapers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 08:16 PM
0

Men already change diapers. An average wife brings in extra ~80 minutes of "household activities" and extra ~20-30 minutes of "caring for household members" per day. An average husband, around $100 pre taxes. Which makes an average wife's "second" "shift" "unpaid" labor worth roughly as much as services of a cybersecurity engineer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 07:57 PM
6

where women aren't free to choose their husband and where the husband is not allowed to beat his wife but is entitled to have sex with her whenever he wishes it Feminists believe that it's this universe, plus-minus three percent. Not single, thus responding here.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/26 05:28 PM
-4

Yes, women don't want a friggin smelly manbaby in their personal space... that is built and maintained by men. Similarly, while I train to build and maintain more and better spaces and then apply these skills, I don't want a gaggle of yapping harpies nagging for feminist extracurriculars and period leave and promotion gender quotas. Only women's want is seen as 100% justified and fair. men who did weren’t doing it as a gift to women Read the interview with HPV vaccine inventor.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 09:12 PM
2

you initially brought up taxes You could apologize for lying; otherwise you are still wasting my time. Well, trying to. Goodbye.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:00 PM
2

that’s more dangerous than being a construction worker Only from the pov of friggin' VEGETABLES who compare mortality per childbirth with mortality per year of work and don't understand the difference. but it’s still irrelevant It is relevant to my top point that earning money for men is deadlier than having sex for women, and this is why women pursuing men for money is worse than men pursuing women for sex. No you initially brought up taxes "There are millions of men forced to pay women money a…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 04:13 PM
2

But women can also die on the job in addition to dying from pregnancy "nationwide annual excess male workplace mortality is higher at 4 to 1 rate" For every 4 men dying at work above women's baseline, 1 woman dies in childbirth. Majority of those men married, btw. What does that have to do with taxes? Nothing; you were the one who brought up taxes. Women aren’t getting married Men. "men outnumber women by a large margin among never-married adults (125 men for every 100 women), but men are outnum…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 03:16 PM
5

Exactly. NO-ONE made it so that women "can't work" or can't earn as much. It was decided by market forces. Then women screeched at simps with guns until they started forcing employers to hire women on positions they never deserved, against the market forces. The problem with this system is that it is never sustainable and only manageable until you run out of simps. Women rely on men naturally. Which is why if you look outside for me, right now, 95% of visible, tangible footprints of human civili…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:52 AM
3

This is why in the past they had to make women rely on men Who "they"? Show me a federal law from any point in history saying women can't work or can only work if they are paid less. I will not wait, you can't.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:09 AM
6

Last time I checked, "unfairness" of dating for autistic men was based on "equality of outcome" framework: autistic men are more likely to stay single, childless, never married, and virginal for life or into advanced age; autistic women, no matter what hurdles they have to jump through, still eventually land at something we can call some measure of successful personal/family life. If "equality of outcome" framework is false, then women should shut up forever about wage gap, CEOs, Nobel prize win…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 11:00 AM
3

Assume everything else is perfect in the relationship I can't. I am with arguably the best person for me that took thousands of miles through several large cities to find. Everything is still NOT perfect in our relationship. But everything is workable. If I could imagine "everything (except this one tiny detail) perfect", I would never let a real woman at two arms' lenghts to me. Also, have an upvote; this is a weird yet decent question, I have no idea who is downvoting you.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 08:14 AM
0

Like I have no idea how this is being quantified There were actual cases of women dying from (ordinary, vanilla, non-BDSM) sex, ridiculously rare. Even with all pregnancy-related mortality added, nationwide annual excess male workplace mortality is higher at 4 to 1 rate. everyone earning wages in the paid labor market pays taxes ~90-98% of ordered to pay alimony, arrested for failure to pay child support, or having to share their pension savings in divorce are men. The situation is slightly bett…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/26 06:27 AM
-8

Somehow men, treat this as worse? Why More men die earning money than women having sex. There are millions of men forced to pay women money at the state's gun point. There are zero women forced to have sex. Men did not spend the last 200 years saying that if not for the Matriarchy, they'd have their own sex and never bother women for it and would finally be allowed to choose women out of genuine love / sympathy and not for T&A; the government did not spend these 200 years passing new laws in res…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 06:57 PM
3

"THIRTEEN...PERCENT... SIXTY-NINE... PERCENT... PER CAPITA... PER CAPITA..." - "Oh fuck, they got Hatemonger" Being female correlates with 1.62 times higher risk of initiating a divorce (no, not just paperwork, stop repeating this dead horse's fart), half of women's first marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary (Census), and the vast majority of women outlive their husbands, despite large age gap couples being a minority. By your post's logic, all marriage is a bad deal for men. Edit: all he…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:30 PM
2

"If men complain about divorces, it means they deserved them." No. If women feel the need to come up with excuses for divorces, it means women know a lot of divorces are initiated for unjust and unjustifiable reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 08:48 AM
2

We're belaboring the same points, so this will be my last reply. Okay, then I'm not wasting time reading it What does this even mean? or replying to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 07:33 AM
2

Can you prove that these men aren't getting married by choice? No; can you prove it for women? Women getting married at all is strong evidence that marriage is NOT some kind of super-awful deal for women that they are massively opting out of as we speak and only entered before because they were brainwashed. The first, the most on-the-surface litmus test would be to see if women truly stay single. The answer is "Eh". More than in the 1950s, combarable to 1900s, less than men. my argument is that …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 05:49 AM
2

I don't buy that. Some struggle, some choose. Same as women. I was mostly referring to the polling data on younger men and women that shows that women are deprioritizing marriage Actually not getting married seems more like "bowing out of the game" to me than "deprioritizing in polling data". you don't believe that domestic labor and motherhood are worth anything "Domestic labor" is objectively worth less than staying in the place. Otherwise, rent would have been either zero, or negative. There …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 04:15 AM
2

Well yes, it's closer to question of fidelity than childbearing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:50 AM
0

men can get married and not acquire assets TRUE. From cost/benefit point of view, the most beneficial thing to himself a married man can do is earn money and immediately flush it all on himself. I don't know how often it happens; I know how often women divorce men. It's true that questions of sexual fidelity, childbearing, and housework are not covered in the legal structure of marriage FALSE. Presumption of paternity is question of childbearing covered in the legal structure of marriage and sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:45 AM
2

Historically, it wasn’t a choice "At 31.5% the percentage of women who were never married in 2022 was nearly equivalent to the rate seen in 1900 (31.3%)." https://www.bgsu.edu/ncfmr/resources/data/family-profiles/FP-24-10.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 03:06 AM
2

Start bowing out of the game like many women are. There are consistenly more never-married men than never-married women in (afaik) EVERY year we have reliable data on, and lately more than ever. She did stay and keep the home... Her labor in that scenario still enabled his breadwinning. By the same logic house owners should just let random women in rent-free. You may look outside and notice it not happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:04 AM
1

or am I missing something? Yes. By law, wives do not have children or "maintain a home" for husbands. Husbands, by law, acquire assets for wives. Women can have children out of wedlock. Women can get married and have no children. Women can get married to one man, and have children with another. Women can promise not to do any of the above and change their mind any second. Women can get married and do no or almost no chores. None of this is a crime, none of this is a misdemeanor, and none of this…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/26 04:01 PM
1

It's definitively obvious that girls and women have been throughly pushed aside There is no rule that every pro-male point has to open with obligatory rimjob to feminist nonsense. However, people also don't admit the other issue, where boys have been sidelined unintentionally by environmental factors. Yes!!! start with that largest ever randomized experiment on single-sex education conducted in Seoul how it has shown better... Its been known since the early 2010s that plastic additives like BPA …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/26 08:13 AM
3

Intersectional feminism is the official policy of European Union. https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/gender-equality/gender-equality-strategy_en This is unfortunately not the case of "Internet is not real life". Actual money, $trillions by some estimates, are poured into finding some way to make more women geniuses/ politicians/ military officers/ whatever. Meanwhile, zero countries mandate pull-up bars at workplaces so that guys don't die of…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 11:08 PM
5

Most graphic designers are women, but also most people with anxiety and depression. For saying that men are naturally more likely to be geniuses, most subs will permaban you on sight. AFTER TWO HUNDRED YEARS of flooding women with "rooms of their own" and "glass ceiling ladders" at the expense of male taxpayers, you are proposing to just stop and take or investigate no measures to make less men criminal, homeless, or autistic, because these things are just natural. Okay, out of curiosity - what …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 10:43 PM
0

I don't see how having a personal living retirement plan, debt-sponge, and work-related negative health outcomes absorber, with state-enforced guarantee of shared opportunity for prosperity, is "the opposite" of a vested interest. Women are and always have been 100% free to pursue men who are worse earners than themselves. There are more never-married men than never-married women; either "marriage is a bad deal for women" is a lie, or women are stupid and flock to a bad deal. Pick whatever. Edit…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 08:39 AM
4

Men are the natural dice "Women and babies are the natural dice of humanity through which evolution occurs. In natural environments, up to 1% of weakest, sickest women died in an average childbirth, and anywhere up to 25-40% of weakest babies never survived to their 1st birthday." There will be a lot of men with genetic mutations Mutations occur in DNA randomly and more-or-less evenly-spread, male or female. There is one small piece of one chromosome out of forty-friggin-six in men that does not…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 08:24 AM
3

(a tear of joy rolling down my cheek) Hello, pure soul. No. No, this is not a serious statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/26 07:52 AM
3

Did you really not know what I meant by “it was a gendered focused study?” "Gender" means "women". No-no-no, I know it actually doesn't but you also know: the UN uses "gender-sensitive language" when they write "she or he" and "women and men" (in French because alphabetical order, in English because fuck you). "Violence is a gendered issue" in feminist "studies" and official UN reports means "men die, women most affected". I meant it was a study focused on how one gender responds to “no.” False;…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 07:56 PM
0

"WAGE GAP" is men earning for wives and daughters - So you're saying men earn nothing for themselves? ...Go masturbate, or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:50 PM
7

It was a gender focused study "Men" is also a gender, I know it's news for many, but it's also truth to all. then you should be really upset at the fact that the vast majority of scientific studies have historically been conducted only on men Why? Red pill cites such studies ALL the time Which ones?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 03:42 PM
1

as the overworked mother Married men work more than married women with chores and child care included, and sacrifice more me-time to marriage than women. Yet it can often feel like a prison sentence of housework There is less housework than ever. forgetting birthdays and anniversaries "Exactly N years since you insisted to invite the government into our bedroom" is not a celebratory occasion. It's better to be the mistress than the wife ))IT IS BETTER TO DIE FOR THE EMPEROR THAN LIVE FOR YOURSEL…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 11:10 AM

I'm a plumber and need to call her to make sure she's home when I arrive.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/26 08:30 AM
2

I think it is a bit pathetic how men nowadays get upset at the thought of having to pay for dinner. My area's police uncovered an organized food digging trap a couple years ago; all the "dates" were hired actresses and the restaurant itself was fake. It's a bit pathetic that men still go on dates at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 02:06 PM
4

why should men interact with women? Because women made it illegal for men to associate among themselves outside of dedicated bathrooms, but especially for anything involving any economic activity. Women stuffed themselves into civil rights laws under false premise that being a wife or a woman generally is kinda like being a slave, so they deserve their fair share of reparations. And let's not fool ourselves, this reform was not aimed at granting men access to work as nurses or attend women's col…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 09:45 AM
5

And they make more money for it. Married men. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/12zoyxy/technical_image_hosting_post/ They don't work and earn for themselves. To my knowledge, it's completely un-investigated if this effect is due to employers' preferential treatment of married men, or if married men just work harder. But this is what "Muh Wage Gap" has always been. Married men earning for their wives and daughters.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 07:25 AM

Like what the ratio is. I don't know. AI slop machine has only recommended me one paper ( https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22015873/ ), it's from 15 years ago, and it vaguely says that "45.3% of pregnancy-associated homicides were associated with intimate-partner violence" Not necessarily committed by intimate partners; STILL less than half. Extrapolating this rate to these numbers, we land at ... (checks notes) 269. Less than suicides. We found another thing that women are better at than men. Ki…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 09:34 PM

Please provide source. Bobbie Jo Stinnett got killed by not an intimate partner. Therefore, "homicide" and "homicide by intimate partner" are two different categories. The second leading cause or another leading cause of death is homicide. "Violence", not "homicide", and "homicide" is still not the same as "homicide by intimate partner". Almost any cause is "A leading" depending on how many you declare "leading", which is an arbitrary choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:56 PM

Homicides are not homicides by intimate partners. These are two overlapping but separate categories. This is easier than "A" vs "THE". Come on. It's 2/3rds of VIOLENCE, not 2/3rds of DEATH. THE leading cause of DEATH is drug overdose.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:30 PM

If you have a study with actual non-paywalled numbers for how many of those homicides are by intimate partner, then 10 minutes ago is the perfect moment to post it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:24 PM

Everything except the least likely cause is a leading cause depending on how many causes you declare "leading". 2/3 is "homicide", not "intimate partner homicide".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 08:21 PM

As only 2/3rds of "violence" is "homicide" (including by people other than intimate partners), it actually ranks lower than cardiovascular or infections with COVID included. "Intimate partner homicide" is even narrower category than "homicide", which is narrower than "violence".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:50 PM

(Tips fedora) Glad to hear this from your flair. American women are not stupid; if the US had the highest maternal mortality in the developed world, and even higher intimate partner homicide during pregnancy, they would have been fleeing in dinghies.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 06:53 PM
7

Why do men constantly complain about the ‘male loneliness epidemic’? They are curious, horny, and sad. Yes, this is pathetic. Some like muscular men, but some like them chubbier. That is also okay. Some like them tall, some like them short. Again, thats also okay. Some women like men who are very quiet snd reserved, while some like very loud and outgoing men. Its okay. Women have different preferences. I would love to see a forum or a board where women share fanarts of short, chubby, reserved me…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 06:25 PM
24

Study Confirms Most Men Do Not Understand The Word 'No' The most telling statistic in the study for me was this: What was the rate for men? I checked for you: men were not surveyed at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 05:58 PM
3

You lasted FOUR words before saying an obvious bullshit; this is not a record, you can do worse. Spoonfeeding complete.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 05:42 PM
2

FOUR words before an obvious bullshit; not a record, do worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 05:36 PM
1

No shooting/stabbing/slicing scars, no piercing, no dyed hair, no alcohol in his fridge, no tattoos, uncircumcised, not a head-bashing athlete and especially not with head-bashing athletic scholarship, no drugs, no family history of clinical insanity. I can work with the rest. And I can make the rest work.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:16 PM
1

Maybe if I report you for ad hominem every time you drag any topic out of adult metrics of odds ratios and effect sizes and into absolutes, anecdotes, and personal attacks, mods will finally decide to ban you permanently, but I am not willing to check; you are too goddamn funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 04:11 PM
1

Women: reward boundary-pushing with spread legs You: "so YOU'RE trying to justify sexual coercion" I thank you for indirectly reminding me to take my pills and recommend you do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 03:51 PM
6

Good men don't push boundaries and stay single
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 02:11 PM
3

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268228333_Life_Paths_and_Accomplishments_of_Mathematically_Precocious_Males_and_Females_Four_Decades_Later https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Annual-incomes-of-participants-and-their-spouses-The-graph-in-a-shows-median-annual_fig3_268228333 At around $400k/y, average salary of the wife of male primary breadwinner drops to basically zero and stays there. Even at $150k/y, the wife's salary is basically insignificant. Twenty-three percent of American marrie…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 10:24 AM
1

If you didn't already know, recently in Ozoro, the male population there have chosen for there to be a 'rape festival' to happen. Right from the start, I think it's bullshit, thank you very much. "Ozoro has vast amount of crude oil and natural gas deposits which are yet to be developed to their full potentials. Shell Petroleum Development Company and the Nigeria National Petroleum Company were the main developers of the oil wells and oil platforms bla bla bla bla bla bla bla" Yeah, I think it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/26 11:24 PM
-1

No-one has to have babies, no-one denied you a job because you are a woman. If I can handle women's separate workplace bathroom because men == rapey (offensive and costs me money), then you can handle the guy asking if you plan to waste 9 months of his time and money to get sweeter deal with maternity leave benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 11:41 PM
6

anyone would choose working hard over being unemployed. Anyone would choose affording not to be in labor force over working hard. Your complaint is that you were asked uncomfortable, but VERY relevant question. A LOT of women never return from maternity leave; employers have to plan ahead, this is how they are still in business. When I filed for life insurance as mandatory part of mortgage, they asked me if I have cancer. Because this is relevant information.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:50 PM
3

at least 4,600% Old data, it's more like 6,000+% or so now.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 09:21 PM
1

I asked AI slop machine for you. I know you will repeat the lie anyway, as I said I'm doing it for the benefit of everyone you are trying to scare. The Leading Cause (Definite Article) Rank: This refers specifically to the number one most frequent or significant factor. Exclusivity: It implies there is only one cause at the very top of the list. Example: "Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States" (meaning it is ranked #1). A Leading Cause (Indefinite Article) Rank: This i…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:54 PM
0

It's not "my source"; it's the article that your source lists as primary, and it NEVER mentions THE leading cause. If you don't understand the difference, ask AI slop machine.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:42 PM
0

"THE leading" - 0 matches; "A leading" - 2 matches. Primary source - "A leading cause". It's a linguistic trick; most women's brains are so fine-tuned to "men aint shit" that they swallow it without chewing, and of course without thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:30 PM
24

Nobody wants to hire a woman who is about to have children. This has been documented, I think they gave the author the nobel price. Everyone wants to hire men with two children and mortgage. These guys will literally grind until their hearts stop... privileged bastards.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:02 PM
3

the most common "A", not "THE". Deliberately misleading rage-fuel headline that people keep mis-repeating just like authors intended. I don't care and not debating this point (you are wrong, there is nothing to debate, I am certain that you know you are wrong); just posting for the benefit of women that you are trying to fearmonger.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 06:25 PM
2

Red Pill never declared itself representative of all men. "If women wanted to have sex with men, lesbians wouldn't exist".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 04:08 PM
2

"Checkmate, atheists"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:49 PM
2

I am not getting into "If you don't fuck a guy, you are not his girlfriend", since I consider this simple truth to be self-evident.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:35 PM
2

why are yall concerned Weall aint. More men than ever are happily single.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:34 PM
5

no side effects I know you aren't serious, so just responding for anyone who might think you're serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:14 PM
-2

I will come up with something that reduces the rights of women the least Everything else I can think of will be disqualified as reduction of women's rights even faster. I could propose sending literally all men to therapy, and women would still complain that it took too much of their resources to accomplish.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 03:10 PM
-2

Time management. And, you can take pills openly in public.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:55 PM
0

There is nothing contradictory in people doing charity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:50 PM
-2

without reducing the rights of women No. Literally everything is rights of women, including harming children that are already born and destroying lives of men. So, I will come up with something that reduces the rights of women the least (they will still complain anyway). I challenge you to come up with a pro autonomy, ethical way to make dating ‘fair’ If there were two buttons but you can press only one: Button 1 - Men get perfect birth control option with only side effect that it actually also …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:49 PM
1

You can have intimacy without anything sexual. You can't have friendship and demand sexual exclusivity. I have no idea what that means. "304" upside-down looks like "hoε". Red herring Not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 02:34 PM
4

A relationship is not trading commitment for sex Agreeing for the wrong reason. A relationship is a charity, it's trading effort, attention, care, and time for nothing; the vast majority of men get absolutely nothing positive from the vast majority of relationships. The point of a relationship is not just for the man to get sex The point of an intimate relationship is to get (ideally, exchange) intimacy; relationships without intimacy are called friendships. It is also not right to get into a re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 01:22 PM
4

"[Adjusted] Poisson regression coefficients were calculated adjusting for birth year, immigration status, childhood [socioeconomic index], number of siblings (full and half-siblings), psychiatric disorder (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, substance misuse, ADHD and personality disorder) and accidents requiring inpatient care." The only result that got mitigated FULLY when adjusted is "offenders more likely to be ever married if convicted once".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:56 AM
3

Would agree if this excerpt was the only piece of evidence available. It is not. "Criminal offending as part of an alternative reproductive strategy: investigating evolutionary hypotheses using Swedish total population data" (Yao et al., 2014) operated with nationwide registry paper trail spanning decades and concluded: offender men are a) more likely to have children, b) more likely to have more children if any, c) more likely to be in more consecutive marriages if ever married, d) more likely …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 08:36 AM
2

How to measure "assholery" and sexual success other than by self-reports? of fucking course the men that self-declare to fuck more are more likely to self-declare to pressure more I don't see how this is a given either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:54 AM
7

Sexually successful men aren't assholes https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1rucglr/men_falsely_claim_that_women_lie_about_their/oan3lio/ I think we can put this topic to rest. Any subgroup of men other than assholes are not assholes (since assholes are rare), yet, assholes are more clustered among sexually successful men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:27 AM
1

When those women turn 35 and get disabled from regular abuse, their solution for themselves and all future generations of women is to vote for more ridiculous red flag laws and take away my gun. That ain't me. But that ain't "doesn't affect me" either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/26 07:23 AM

So you refuse to engage with criticism of your titular claim under your own debate post?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:45 PM

Dating isn't fair How is dating unfair to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 12:13 PM
2

If patriarchy == paying attention to genitals, then trans-exclusionary feminism is patriarchy. I'm just saying, "paying attention to genitals" is a very poor definition of "patriarchy"; it should be either other word for this phenomenon, or other definition for this word. Colloquial feminist understanding of patriarchy is men oppressing women. No amount of prancing around will change it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/26 10:29 AM
-2

I mean something closer to what bell hooks described: a system of interlocking cultural assumptions, carried and enforced by both men and women, that assigns rigid roles based on gender, punishes deviation from those roles, and convinces its carriers that these arrangements are natural rather than inherited. By this definition, matriarchy/gynarchy is patriarchy. If this is the extent of bell hooks' definition, I double down on my point that she is stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:29 PM

Women don't owe men "sexual equality" Yes. she therefore owes you the same sort of sex No. But I don't owe her "relationship equality" either. As an example, if her expectation is decades of sexual exclusivity, I would rather grant it to someone who can and want to actually use her tongue.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 06:27 PM
2

Switzerland and Lichtenstein gave women the right to vote in '71 and '84. Soviet Union did before the US. Singapore is among top 3 richest countries per capita, criminalized marital rape in 2020. You're just salty because (1) now women can tell you no I am displeased with feminism because it takes away from my SO, child, and mother-in-law and gives to useless eaters just because they have pussies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/26 07:35 AM
0

More like almost one in four, but it's close.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 11:02 PM
4

How many men in western society do you know who are the sole providers for their household and who's wives do not work at all? Twenty-three percent.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 10:46 PM
-4

I don't care. I care where the claim comes from. Thus far, the answer is "ArsepullGuesstimate".
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 10:35 PM
-2

I'd like to read the details on the source that "both people working full time jobs" comes from. The closest (besides this BLS report) I know of is Pew report made in 2015, except a) it focuses on parents (families with children), and b) it shows that in most families both spouses do not work full time. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2015/11/04/raising-kids-and-running-a-household-how-working-parents-share-the-load/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 08:33 PM
-4

Most couples these days habe both people working full time jobs "In 2024, both spouses were employed in 49.6 percent of married-couple families" BLS
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 07:56 PM
1

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Multivariate-analyses-of-variances_tbl1_7782473 Canada, 2003, N = 261+150. Out of 14 investigated intelligence categories, sex offenders scored lower than non-sex offenders in all, the difference was significant at 5% in 5, at 1% in 2, and at 0.1% in two more. The difference was not significant in 5 more categories. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11065-023-09628-w Intimate partner violence perpetrators, meta-study (N(total)=50...300+, depending on …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 04:17 PM
1

I have said nothing denying that abusers exist; you are derailing into irrelevant point that no-one made. The fact that men ARE smarter than women on average by approximately 1/6th of a standard deviation at adulthood does not mean that all men are equally smart and equally smarter than all women. Smart men don't abuse. High-IQ serial rapists/killers make it into news reels and fictionalized books because of how insanely uncommon they are. Given that a) most men are not abusers; b) men who are a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:47 PM
1

THE VAST majority of men are smart enough not to be evil. Yet, almost every woman has an ex horror story. What part of "the vast majority" is confusing?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 03:29 PM
3

THE VAST majority of men are smart enough not to be evil. Yet, almost every woman has an ex horror story.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 02:59 PM
8

I love how the option "Men are nowhere near as abusive as your feminist rage-machine made you believe" is out of the picture.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/26 12:44 PM
6

Which raises the question of what those men mean by being good Not a rapey scumbag would be a great start, IF women truly have to start somewhere, and IF your post is truly not "Men Ain't Shit, the Thread". You don't know what happens in chat 1-1 on a dating app, or what happens behind closed doors. If men are perfect manipulators, then this IS the "Men Ain't Shit, the Thread". In a sample of 156 heterosexual young adult men, Lalumiere and his colleagues measured rape proclivity with items such …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/26 09:26 PM
0

This guy fucks
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/26 08:47 PM

most males hate us Women Females aren't important enough for such a strong emotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:33 PM
2

"end of the dating age" is 20 wrinkly washed-out old trash, a 25-year-old single man ...Hate to burst the bubble, but lots of people postpone all this cringey dating nonsense to even later out of their own free will. Your favorite Whatever-PErson you mentioned what, 2 or 3 times in one post, is 33. To the topic: AI "dating" is a waste of perfectly fine energy-thirsty toy on a weak half-measure. It's unhealthy in a sense that you are taking a capable technology and using it to 1% of its potential…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:21 AM
4

Men should just pursue asexual and demisexual women if attraction is such an issue. "All the downsides of having a φόιδ at home with none of the benefits" (ad music playing)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:39 PM
2

No, there was no obstacles, "emotional cheating" is not a thing (it's what cheating women made up to justify letting another man nut inside them because their bfs/husbands have female friends that sometimes hold their hands or peck them), and I'm old and tired and somewhat germaphobic and don't even want to have sex with my SO as much as she likes and deserves.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 03:04 PM
2

Um. This is not the law of equivalent exchange. In scenario one, her feefs for me are 100% and hots are 50%. If a woman considers me fairly average, it means I'm at least above 8 out of 10 men. In scenario 2, hots are at 100%, but feefs are absent (zero).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:00 AM
5

Don't know. I tend to skew Yes, but I've seen too many people calling it infatuation and lust and accusing me of lacking emotional intelligence for not being able to tell the difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:05 AM
10

Question For Men There was a nice post asking women Why are you downvoting I have not even clicked on that post.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:43 AM
3

People have even called Margot Robbie or Sydney Sweeney “mid.” Women have probs spent a million times more collectively mentioning that one guy than he spent writing that tweet. "0/10 would not bang" became a meme because it's absurd.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 09:36 PM
2

Wohooo kink thread. I am curious of your thoughts on this. Joseph Bédier did compilation of Tristan and Iseult narrative into a single book, and "magical bond" was its most boring part. The book is awesome tho. Are there any equivalent prominent male fantasies "Clingy / inseparable" or ultra submissive prostrating herself and squealing "Oh Mǝin KnöÖög!" is a niche taste. Men are simple creatures, our main and primary and most common fantasy is to be loved and appreciated for who we are.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/26 12:27 PM
2

Men have three "natural defaults". Childhood well before puberty, when girls are a mild annoyance and (almost) no-one wants to play with them. The "hormonal phase" that lasts roughly until 30, when "playing with girls" is basically the only thing a guy really wants to think of. Then past 30, a peace of mind should take over venerating the fairer sex, but it depends on the guy's family status and if he has daughters (and how many). So with men it's like three different natures vs nurture, and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 03:57 PM
6

Humans are the only species where the males kill females Absolutely no. Every other mammal species do not attack their females No again; Google AI slop machine is free, you can just put nonsense there for fact-checking if Googling "the old way" is too much. Male birds are the ones with colorful feathers to impress female birds etc. Birds have literally different set of sex chromosomes than mammals. Don't make me tap that Oglaf comic with anglerfish.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/26 02:33 PM
2

Inducing FAS(D) or opiate withdrawal in newborns, breastfeeding while drunk / high.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:52 PM
2

If you mean How Couples Meet and Stay Together Survey, raw estimate of women leaving relationships was higher than men for non-marital non-cohabiting, non-marital cohabiting, and marital relationships, but only with the latter the difference reached statistical significance. Since this isn't clickbaitey enough, the press reported it as "Women leave marriages but not relationships more often". There's a meta-analysis by Iris Warhing showing that women initiate breakups more often, but its full te…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:05 PM
2

I am just back from checking. Sex between caretaker and special needs person is generally legal. Things are only "highly unethical" within Californian eggshell thought-bubble stuffed with neurotics obsessed with oppression dynamics and power differentials. Apparently 18% of the surveyed Gen Zers and millenials also admit to having banged their boss. But in general, Yes, please accelerate the societal collapse. Start with smaller things, like making sex a no-no in couples with one breadwinner, co…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 07:53 PM
4

I talked about outcome. You said outcome doesn't matter ("you only see outcomes, not the reasons behind them"). I say outcome is the only thing that matters. Men who claim to know "the truth" about female attraction mean another thing by "attraction" than you do in your OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 12:24 PM
16

"Attraction" in terms of "understanding the truth" describes what makes a woman spread her legs, not her heart skip a beat. Outcome is the only thing that matters. If you cause a genocide, nobody cares you had good intentions in mind. If you invent a cancer cure, nobody cares that you were actually working on a new chemical warfare agent. If you hate-fuck a drug-dealing felon and let him knock you up, nobody cares that at that very moment you imagined your high-school sweetheart that you left be…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 11:31 AM
2

"Porn, hentai, etc..." - known staples of conservative policies... if by "conservatives" you mean "literally anyone short of anti-porn SWERF radfems". which is why they hate feminism : because feminist women I hold feminism to account for its promises because feminism made those promises. "American women lately have been living much longer than men—walking through their leftover lives like living dead women. Perhaps men may live longer in America when women carry more of the burden of the battle…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/26 10:07 AM
3

There are few places (if any) one could go where you go confidently with the idea that you won't encounter a single man. Women made such places illegal. Martha Griffiths, Patsy Mink, and Betty Friedan, to be specific in the US context. Unlike a bad area, where you generally get attacked to get any valuables stolen We should probably make mugging legal, they only do it to survive amirite. Aggravated assaults account for 71.3% of all violent crimes, whereas robberies (which include muggings) accou…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/26 02:51 AM
6

"Gooooombaaaaaaaa! Go, Goomba! Join the Goombas!"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:13 PM
2

Its a starting point and women still didn't occupy any structural positions of power ONLY when FUKKEN MAELZ give every last bit of executive, legislative, and judicial power entirely to women... You're talking out you arse with this point and I'm not going to entertain someone this clueless on this topic a minute longer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 10:28 AM
3

What are yall's thoughts on this? Sex does not matter. You are a perfectly normal human being. To "leave the progeny", statistically speaking, you need about 60 nuts. 64 if you want to be pedantic (Yes, an average conception takes 32 unprotected intercourses). For comparison, living even a short 70-year life from 18 to 70 as an adult man will take: 56,940 meals, 37,960 times brushing your teeth, 13,052 times going to work and back, 624 times paying bills. "Butbutbut look at this study showing th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 06:04 AM
2

The Sovereign of the world's most powerful empire is the greatest power a single individual can have. I am sorry that it's not enough for women to enact meaningful positive change. A great irony that after 3 centuries of feminist bitching about male heads of the state, once it is a woman and something Oopsie happens on her watch, suddenly head of the state does not matter at all. "Anti-gay amendment" got passed in 1885, when queen Victoria enjoyed immense respect, authority, and influence. Appar…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:53 PM
2

Women are more homophobic No; yet, homophobic laws that specifically target men but not women were NOT because "men were the ones in power", we have quite unambiguous counter-examples. Britain was one of only three major European powers that prosecuted strictly and only male homosexuality; also, under Elizabeth II's rule, in 2003, a law was passed that defined rape as penetration with a penis, making women effectively immune to this charge. British monarch has Royal Prerogative of Mercy; ironica…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 08:46 AM
8

I have. [Feminist writer and critic] Elaine Showalter, in her study on Victorian women and insanity, has noted that women were incarcerated more than men in nineteenth-century English asylums. Her explanation for this was the fact that women, compared to men, stayed in asylums longer, that they experienced a lower death rate, and that their relative poverty put them at risk. https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/cbmh.4.2.99 Men die, women most affected.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 12:19 AM

DISCUSSION🗨️ ABOUT MAIN PPD POSTS📮, LOOKS👀, AND N-COUNT🔢 ARE RESTRICTED🚫 FROM THE DAILY🌞 MEGATHREAD🧵 ??? What have I missed?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 11:58 PM
4

Irrelevant AND factually false; Alan Turing got sentenced during the rule of Elizabeth II (a week short of two months after ascension), according to the law passed during the rule of Queen Victoria.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 10:19 PM
9

Austria Sentenced roughly 10-20 men per 1 woman to roughly twice as long. Much of Europe by 1950 consisted of Germany, Britain, and USSR (most of European continent's land mass and roughly half of population); all three prosecuted male but not female homosexuality. Post-Napoleonic regimes, Italy, and Greece refused to criminalize homosexuality at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 09:32 PM
2

Rádo se stalo! Shorter than "my brother in Flying Spaghetti Monster".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:48 PM
7

Lesbianism was considered a crime throughout history. Even where it was (quite few and irrelevant places), it was a lesser offense than male homosexuality. Britain never had a single woman sentenced to prison strictly for homosexuality. Most documented cases of "persecution" of lesbians revolve around stupid publicity stunts (such as cross-dressing, impersonating a man, and marrying a woman in church). AI is telling me that there is one documented case of a lesbian couple sentenced strictly for …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:39 PM
9

That’s even worse? It happened It was not a prescriptive punishment. And being sent to an asylum for life isn’t better than being imprisoned. Gay men were also sent to asylum for life. They gave lesbian women lobotomies and electroshock therapy. They gave gay men the same thing and insulin comas as a bonus.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:26 PM
3

Yes it's not; since being a lesbian was not a crime, mental illness "treatment" was not used as alternative to prison time; "corrective rape" is absent from any criminal code I'm aware of from 18th century to today. If you want to talk anecdotes, then just go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:20 PM
16

Gay men historically faced equal or greater social stigma The only part of the post I have a problem with. It was never "equal". When lesbians "couldn't marry", gay men were thrown in prison and chemically castrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 08:04 PM
2

to strive to know the difference between healthy​ externalizing and hatred. We already know it, healthy externalizing IS hatred because anything is hatred. I have seen women saying that the word "lady" is misogynist. One theme that commonly came up was "you can blame your parents and even be mad at them without hating them". This was for people reluctant to acknowledge some of the severity of the mistreatment of their parents and their effects. "They were doing their best". I know how much it co…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 05:54 PM
2

GTA is arguably the biggest game of all time targeted for male gamers and the cover art is a stacked woman in a bikini Maybe in artist's headcanon that woman posed for the cover just for money and then went to empower herself three times in a row to cleanse the patriarchal aftertaste./s
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 03:13 PM
6

Genetics and one's past are roughly similar as the best available predictors of one's future behavior. It does not mean that they predict the future perfectly. But yes, everyone's past matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:12 PM
0

Video games - call of duty is completely non sexual My brother in Cthulhu got banned from Steam's adult section and Itchio.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/26 01:10 PM

manosphere retards Cool; scrolled down to conclusion, saved myself 10 minutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 08:58 PM

That your and top commenter's imaginary scenario is imaginary. Legal presumption of paternity usually starts at 300 days before birth. Pro-abortionists insist that children don't know, feel, think, or understand anything at this stage.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 02:33 PM
2

American Time Use Survey; I did a whole-ass post. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1en4f2o/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_husbands_are_not/
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:46 PM

If a man is willing to litigate paternity he is most probably already divorced, denied full custody, and slapped with child support that he found unreasonable, long before his biological relation to the child came into picture. Misattributed paternity can be established by hundreds of other means.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 01:20 PM

Do you think the men who are trying to prove paternity fraud are the type to stick around if they find out they’re not the fathers? I don't know. Under current family court system, proven misattributed paternity is basically automatic full custody to the mother. Acknowledging that a man could choose to leave Top commenter assumed that they will ALL "choose to leave". "Not only have they lost who they thought was their father"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:50 PM
-1

The US has three official definitions of "full-time". Most men work more extra paid hours that women do extra unpaid hours.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:46 PM

To assume that ALL men will abandon children that they spent years raising just because it turned out they aren't related is to assume that men are not human. Lots of men willingly raise children that aren't theirs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 12:35 PM

Not only have they lost who they thought was their father OP said nothing about this, it's not a given, it's only a given if you think men are not human, and these children still have biological fathers. All women need is to name them. Think of the upsides. Stacy's doorstep. A court-appointed social worker and half a dozen Chadlets. "Hello, is mr Thundercock home?" but his mother is now being treated like she deserves.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 11:43 AM

You can't take away precious years of a man's life, use his resources and time on another man's child and then pay some money and be done with it. Women: "Ackshully i can and I won't even need to pay shit, watch me teehee" (runs to a voting booth to vote for another explicitly anti-male rabid feminist or cuck white knight)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/26 10:42 AM
3

Oh cool, greentext thread. Fukken maelz, amirite.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/26 01:25 PM
1

you can only pick two of them A+C. I'm an adult, I know how to handle things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 06:14 PM
0

/r/shittyaskscience I'm in love
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 05:04 PM
2

Women no longer need men financially or socially... the bad old days when women had no autonomy Women still preselect men who earn better than them both for marital and non-marital romantic relationships, and women always had as much autonomy as they were willing to work for. "At 31.5%, the percentage of women who were never married in 2022 was nearly equivalent to the rate seen in 1900 (31.3%)." These are established truths that I will not elaborate on or debate. you’re only besties with someon…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 04:58 PM
1

My SO is my greatest fan here. 10+ years together and raising a child.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/26 01:20 PM
2

"Structures occur naturally; even pet fish owners will confirm." What is meant is that humans will confirm even sooner, and I have provided several examples of human dominance behavior from children fighting over a bottom bunk all the way to voters choosing a taller presidential candidate. The point is not that people should act like pet fish, it's that they already do, just with more ballot-dropping and less tail-biting. Better strategies require: equal trust in each others' opinions / judgemen…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 03:19 AM
7

harem anime, and/or dating sims No matter how much you grind, your wife will never have fully-articulated hypersensitive tentacles 😐
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/26 02:50 AM
2

Humans arrange into hierarchies not because they put effort into imitating pet fish (who are literally not in a "survival-based hierarchy in nature"). Wanting mutual energy shrinks dating pool because "exact-the-sameness" is rare: rolling six dice twice gives around 4% probability that both results will have the same sum. Even initially-matching partners can diverge with age. A woman who is fine with "no hierarchy" statistically exists and would make a great romantic partner, but she is taken. M…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 12:19 AM
4

"It's just one guy's opinion"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 07:40 AM
15

it was framed that women for the exact same job same qualifications I don’t think it was ever framed like that. Obama did frame it like that. Several times actually. "Women still earn just 70 cents for every dollar a man earns. It's worse for African American women and Latinas. Over the course of her career a woman with a college degree is going to earn hundreds of thousands of dollars less than a man who is doing the same work." "Women are the breadwinners for a lot of families, and if they're …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 10:57 PM

https://np.reddit.com/r/shittymoviedetails/comments/1n8boph/in_the_wuthering_heights_2026_this_scene_is/ncegxuh/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 09:10 AM
0

Structures occur naturally; even pet fish owners will confirm. Dominance is a natural mechanism allowing animals NOT fight to death over every little disagreement. Finding a partner who matches your energy exactly makes as much sense as finding someone of the same height: you shrink your own dating pool, but especially as a straight woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 06:45 PM

Find someone who believes in you as much as movie studios believe in Jared Leto. And then Tron all over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:48 AM
3

What are your values? Categorical imperative is pretty close. What achievements are you working towards? Finish drawing a comic, patent an actual in-demand invention (or several), help reforest my nearest wilderness areas with something more valuable and beautiful than shitty degenerate pines and birches and firs, read as much as I can of what survived since before 500AD. There was more but this is what I can actually do in time while I'm still alive and in good health. Do you meet a lot of wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 09:49 AM
2

10 years of spraying a country on the other side of the Pacific with napalm and carcinogenic defoliants in response to an attack that never actually happened is not "last resort". "Draft is unfair" - "But have you considered the dishes?" Have you considered actually using the damn dishwasher when it's full and not neurotically twice a day?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/26 03:18 PM
2

Terribly by trial and error; would have stayed out of dating entirely until age 23ish or so if given a second chance at life. How I am certain I'm with the right person: 1) Healthy sense of harmony and skillful de-escalation: she derives no pleasure ever from making me nervous. She does not assume malice if I do something not up to her standard and does not hold grudges. This is rare, I can count people like this on one hand. 2) Engineering education and work experience. 3) Gratefulness: 10 year…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 06:46 PM
2

which was about the use of the term "deal" being an incentivized opportunity. Then this is trivial and there is nothing to discuss; we know for absolute certain which incentives work and which don't. I am just back from checking; among Nordic countries, super feminist, super-women-friendly, cosmic-tier free obstetric hospitals, every single one has fertility rate lower than the US by latest data. Super-brief nitpicks and clarifications: Your entire OP is trying to argue that women unequivocally …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/26 04:20 AM
2

Yes. Women should be accomodated with entire workplace just for them. Vegan salads in break room, AC perma-set to "Hell", essential oils and "Live Love Laugh" posters mandatory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 07:03 PM
1

Women have suffered a lot and do suffer a lot still. I don't think it's any of us is gonna argue with that. I am gonna argue that it's irrelevant to feminism. Suffering is natural. Feminism is the belief that women's suffering is artificial and caused by men. Not all, not always, but too often for bad reasons (such as enforcement and maintenance of the gender hierarchy).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 06:52 PM
3

So why wouldn’t a woman “withhold sex” Because she calls herself heterosexual and screams at men for suggesting she might not be, if she only sees sex with men as a cost of being in a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 05:24 PM
6

Mmmm! Ragebait rush!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 12:18 PM
1

Fascinating how when it comes to the topic of male behavior, "incentives" are screamed from the tops of mountains Not from me; behavior is 40% genetic. Although treating men decently is one thing that no-one has ever tried. Isn't that convenient for men, and for society at large? Society gets their worker bees and men don't have to put forth any additional effort There are 4 men dying supporting their families per 1 woman dying working OR for "pregnancy-related reasons" combined (by CDC definiti…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/26 10:11 AM

There is no inalienable right to vote. You can acknowledge something that isn't but that's called religion. NJ wrote women's vote into state constitution; this is as good acknowledgement as it gets below federal level. The Declaration of Sentiments talks about permission, not acknowledgement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 10:23 PM
2

Water is wet
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 07:45 PM
1

As TRP has largely coalesced in response to feminist madness, it's fitting to describe it in terms borrowed from feminism. Truth 1: Men and women are not the same. Men are not women, women are not men. (and we have reached the insanity point where even this statement might land you in hot water) Truth 2: Men and women are not equivalent; they are different in stimuli / reactions, needs, and performances. Consequences: There is no such thing as a woman "doing exactly the same work" as a man, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/26 03:11 PM

"Why can't you just be normal?" - [screams]
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/26 10:35 PM
2

Abaxeron's passive heuristic: with each additional usage of passive voice, the probability of the claim being nonsense gets closer to 100%. "Mothers get" "she's blamed" "she's the one looked down upon" "she is specifically still the one blamed" "Mothers get" "a lone woman is expected" "is expected" "she's expected" "Mothers get" "Mothers are treated" "mothers are not compensated" "any attempt to leverage that labor is mocked and dismissed" "get gaslit" 13 Now add "By/from her (woman's) own hyste…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 10:48 PM

All relationships in this day and age are temporary unless proven otherwise; not permanent unless proven otherwise. No woman is some old man's caretaker unless she either chose to stick by a guy for another day, or to apply for a job as a nurse.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 06:12 PM

Who is meant by "A COUPLE DOZEN"? No-one has so many pregnancies in this day and age.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 12:47 PM

Now a lone woman is expected to provide the socialization of a couple dozen people by herself, and is expected to navigate multiple generations worth of contradictory advice without any help. And she's expected to do it while working full-time on top of it. provide the socialization of a couple dozen people by herself working full-time on top of it. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/26 11:17 AM

Women: outconsume ~150billion of men's money You: this guy noticed, he just wants to hurt women!! Yes, this is simping. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:08 AM

(Clap, clap, clap) this takes the cake as the least relevant comment in quite some time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 10:04 AM

nobody should have objected to opening them to women Open your front door to the homeless. Now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 08:08 AM
2

Feminism is based on selfish lies from its inception. Declaration of Sentiments opens the list with a falsehood: "He has not ever permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise." In reality, New Jersey allowed women to vote between 1790 and 1807, which in 1848 was within living memory. While Yes, it was not all women, not everywhere, etc., it is a notable case of men giving women the right two vote TWO FULL YEARS before Wollstonecraft wrote Vindication. Which kicks the…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/26 03:09 AM
16

I am become Automod substitute, destroyer of worlds "Women could literally wake up one day and abort all the men on earth, women have 0 reason to be upset at men's behaviors." ???
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/26 12:23 AM
2

Then don't. Or do and feel weird. I am also buddies with a no-nonsense lovely green-haired feminist lady who is a Nature-published scientist (first in the list, not in the back; i.e. [her name] et al.).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 06:28 PM
0

Not OP, but: define "stay in a relationship."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 09:25 AM
6

Responding to this comment because it will drop you a notification. There was a German(if memory serves) study showing that women are actually more likely than men to donate organs to their sick opposite-sex spouses. Too lazy to google, but if I ever saw a counter-edivence to bitter truths, this was it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 07:49 AM
2

I paid for more than half Very conscientious. Where I work. Like most women... Do none of the women you know work ever? Most married women are not breadwinners; most married men are. Unless you were an emancipated orphan, wardollies with your summer break income (while your necessities were covered by your parents) is a commendable formative experience, but poor proxy (badumtss) for balancing hobby expenses with adult and family responsibilities. You are still not being serious. I applied for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 08:23 AM
3

I had to plan how to pay for well in advance and which many people besides myself wanted The unbearable mental load of spending money relative to earning it is why we have negative taxes./s Event for the bride's female social matrix is still event for the bride. You are not being serious. It does not take a lot of planning to afford wardollies (done it when I was 15 Obviously "affording" at someone else's expense does not count. You are not being serious. it doesn't take planning to go to work e…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 09:41 PM
2

Ma'am this is a Wendy's We are discussing the merit of "men as planners"; the best relevant thing you can squeeze here is blame men for unplanned pregnancies.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 08:32 PM
3

Like a breadwinner but I meant time scale: to disprove "men as planners" you bring up one day of entirely optional expensive party very often held only because the woman insisted on it - no offense, not saying it was your case; speaking generally. I'm sticking with the wardollies fellas. To earn enough to afford them and then still have time to paint takes some serious time management.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 08:00 PM
2

Throughout the last 7.5 years I have been paying the mortgage, I told my SO to cut down on spending exactly zero times, including during COVID. Men are architects of society and planners, you are welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:07 PM

Tell me you didn't read to the last two sentences without telling.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 10:26 AM
2

Do you think women should start committing more crimes to reduce the amount of non-felon - felon matches? As long as men commit significantly more crimes than men, these matches unlikely to go away. If there is no way to match with a non-felon, just have a talk and use donor sperm. Violent convicts have 2 times more babies by crude estimate and 5 times by adjusted relative to non-violent criminals, and it's because they have more baby mamas. No, the problem is not misreported side hustle income …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 10:09 AM
1

For your top point are you meaning women 20+ in general should be with their highschool sweetheart or their damaged goods, I mean being happily with their first love for life is the optimal scenario for both sexes. Imagine never feeling heartbroken - and never breaking the heart of anyone else. Yes, relationships fail. Yes, an average (median) person has... what was it, 4-6 partners, but around 15-20% are still with their first. Yes, half of first marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 09:33 AM
-3

If you are older than 19 and not together with your first and only high school sweetheart possibly pregnant with his twins or at least planning to be, you are as much a lost cause as I am; everything from this point is mostly just damage control. Here is how to control damage as a woman: If the hots for a bad boy who is a literal convict are unbearable, use contraception, and I mean really use it. Before you jump in, estimated 1 in 4 children born in Sweden, arguably the most feminist nation on …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 01:29 AM
2

Reminds me a post asking men what would they recommend to their daughters in complicated dating scenarios. I am afraid my answer stays the same. "Go ask your mother." In a vacuum, I could share some bland insights on how I dealt with unrequited crushes, but we are living in reality where men are patronizing scumbags if they tell women to bump uglies less, and player scumbags if more. Seriously, you women supposedly fought for the supposed right to sort these things out by yourselves. Wanna know …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 06:03 PM
8

But I digress. A lot, can you TL;DR in the OP? I've read the post three times in a row and still don't get what we're supposed to debate. You start with a title and then contradict it as a closing point. Other than physical contact, there is no difference between a friendship and relationship relationships are even emotionally closer than a best friend would be
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 02:28 PM
5

Do men underestimate how often women are optimizing for risk reduction rather than attraction? 1 in 4 children in the most feminist nation on Earth is born to a felon father and a non-felon mother. I don't estimate how often, I know for certain: not enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/26 07:12 AM
5

An industrial water treatment conference; one company brought a blonde buxom harpist, the other slender twins in evening gowns. We aren't buying anything anyway you idiots, we are here to scope out and rip off.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 09:41 PM
1

They'll move in, do all of the wifely duties (cooking, cleaning, caring, sex), and commit to a man fully This is as common as men expecting wives to do 100% of chores, work full time as primary or sole breadwinners, and still have enough libido for daily sex. Which itself is as common as terrorist attacks on skyscrapers using passenger jets. Which has happened a couple times, decades ago. I sort-of agree with the sentiment but not with the dramatic "men are scum women have it worse" layer of pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 11:48 PM
3

Thor daughter Black clouds on the horizon Great thunder and burning rain Her chariot pounding I heard the Heavens scream her name I watched as she shouted To the giants who died that day She held up her hammer high And called to Odin for a sign
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 05:49 PM
2

The "brain focused on sex/relationship/family" hormonal shock wave lasts roughly between 18 and 30. Then it becomes a "Meh" nagging buzz at the back of one's mind. To "leave the progeny", statistically speaking, you need about 60 nuts. 64 if you want to be pedantic (Yes, an average conception takes 32 intercourses). For comparison, living even a short, 70-year life from 18 to 70 as a man will take: 56,940 food intakes, 37,960 teeth brushings, 13,052 times going to work and back, 624 times paying…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 08:54 AM

I still appreciate when she is happy to have my hands on hers. Which is almost every time. On this story, Yes, the story is most likely real, schtweaty u r not entoitled, you can't negotiate attraction, go to therapy, "the relationshipeth hath deterioratedth", all that nonsense. I have more things to say but I am sure I am not allowed to by the rules. Let's put it this way: yes, nature takes no hostages, genetics is a lottery, meet her mother first.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/26 08:39 AM

Question is built on false premises. 40% of births are out of wedlock, half of marriages don't survive to 20th anniversary, a quarter of married women have zero wage income, and the majority of autistic and low-IQ children are born to parents of reasonably young age. I agree that fathering a child at such an advanced age is not a sound life strategy, but I hate to remind that pregnancies and childbirths usually happen with some involvement of women and their decision-making. It's not for childre…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 04:51 PM

Meanwhile, men of all ages openly admit that they’re most attracted to 18-22 women - and betcha they don't mean fat ones! - which is an incredibly tiny slice of the female population. They are still attracted to other women. For women, when they mentally place a man into a "No" box, his attractiveness falls below zero. And broadly, there is no way back out, and this can happen 15 years into marriage. It's alien to me as well that women initiate 68% of divorces and are maliciously responsible for…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 01:38 PM
2

the patriarchy has long upheld heterosexuality as being the “default” for all people, including women. This is simply false; "the patriarchy" upheld heterosexuality as the "default" for MEN. Which is why even in regimes where homosexuality was a crime for both sexes, men got harsher punishments (lashes vs death penalty), while in the West lesbian relationships were not criminalized at all, while male homosexuality was punishable from prison and "depersoning" (fired from job, stripped of awards, …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 10:24 AM
3

This post is up for 22 hours, and I spent this time thinking over it in the back of my mind. The Blue Pill is gendered locus of control. Everything bad or undesirable happening to women MUST be externally and almost always maliciously imposed onto them. Even if it is imposed undeniably by other women, they MUST be working under men's control or influence. Same or similar or worse things happening to men MUST somehow be either their own fault, or strictly fault of other men. Everything good happe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 09:37 AM
1

Hard disagree on technicality: look up world's richest women, and see how many of them are heiresses. Look up SSA report on "distribution of zero-earning years by gender"; women are three times more likely than men to spend more than 25 years earning nothing. If you look outside for me, like, right now, you will notice these women not dying of starvation on the streets. They managed to pull this off. Yes, their lives might be slightly worse than their highest expectations, but not at the level o…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/26 08:44 AM
2

Like I treat any other figment of my imagination. Sex makes babies. Contraceptives fail. STIs can permanently alter your life. Once you reach the moment of touching other person's intimate parts, "non-temporary" things can happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/26 02:58 PM
3

https://theweek.com/articles/446503/elliot-rodger-secret You don't want to go there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:02 PM

When this disparity arises, I notice a lot of men react with “80% of homicide victims are male!” This argument is perfectly in-place if "the disparity arises" in women's attempt to hoard and monopolize victimhood; it's reasonable to remind: modern Western women are the safest known demographic in entire known documented and fossilized history of our entire genus. These women's lives still being not perfect - is not evidence that they are systemically artificially worsened to keep them at the bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 04:18 PM
4

No-no, it's "RADICalization"; I'm talking RACIalization. It's a belief that following certain culture, observing customs, following a religion, wearing certain clothes, hairstyles, listening to certain music, talking with an accent/dialect, etc. - are all kind of a racial identity, therefore prejudice against these things are kind of racism - like (for example) saying out loud "Melania Trump has thick accent". Yes, it's that stupid.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:40 AM
5

It already has; look up "cultural racialization".
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 11:28 AM
9

The word "misogyny" has lost its impact and meaning to attrition. Within the last 15ish years, it got applied to basically everything, including feminist ideas and initiatives deemed not feminist enough. We had people here on PPD unironically arguing that looking in a woman's general direction for far too long is misogyny. If you have been on the Internet since #MeToo and have not spent this time under a rock, you know what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 09:01 AM
4

Everything is misogyny, including things mutually exclusive (such as "talking to women" and "not talking to women"). To any person using the word "misogyny" unironically in 2026, the answer to "Is X misogyny" should always be "Yes, move on." The difference between RP and non-RP self-improvement boils down to this: a non-RP man improves in order to attract a woman and make her see his inner beauty, form a personal bond and connection, and hopefully stay as his partner for life out of mutual respe…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:37 AM
3

"but women do emphasise financial prospects stronger in their dating choices on average" - Understatement of the year; "We found that ratings of attractiveness were around 1000 times more sensitive to salary for females rating males, compared to males rating females." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381730315X
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/26 08:06 AM
3

I wanted to suggest moving to Britain that planned to make it a crime to call a woman "hag" on twiXter, but apparently England decided against it in 2022, and Scotland in 2025. Such cases; I'm afraid we all will just have to deal with people sometimes being dicks.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 06:04 PM
2

feel free to downvote this comment too I have not downvoted any of your comments. Went back to check if by some miracle I did it by accident; No, I have not downvoted any of your comments or OP post. i’m not saying women are still forced to marry anybody or that it was common in recent times. i’m asking WHY it happened in the FIRST PLACE. Same reason it happened to men; unlike laws, customs are not designed rationally, they form through terrible wobbly chaotic process of cultural evolution. Goog…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 05:43 PM
0

Why were women not allowed to choose who they married for the longest?... Did they just decide to give all this up and wait for men to decide when we should get it back? Loaded question; none of this is true. Don't try to drown me in "feminist" "sources": part of your list is simply not a thing ("women couldn't have bank accounts"), other part is badly misinterpreted, and the remainder only existed locally, and anyone who disliked these norms could come up to mayors/governors and punch them in t…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 04:54 PM
1

so men never restricted woman choices on what to do with their bodies? like the right to abortion or when they can tie their tubes Women are the majority of voters, roughly the same share of men and women are pro-life. Trying to portray abortion as men restricting women is simply false. i can keep going. I have no doubt in you. i’m confused on the correlation of the homeless person and women. also what if off rip im to allow that person into my home, then what’s the argument ? The argument is th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 01:45 PM
1

i mean men were able to vote before women There has never been a single second since declaration of independence of the US when women were banned from voting by federal law, or when all men could vote while all women couldn't. Puerto Rican men don't participate in elections of presidents to this day, despite having been conscripted into four military conflicts. What's wrong? Are you insecure? Are you afraid that their superior Puerto Rican equality will hit your prejudices like a tidal wave and …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 11:18 AM
2

why did they also restrict women’s education and autonomy? They didn't. Not any more than you restrict access to shelter for the homeless by keeping your front dòor locked. Historically men built more schools and workplaces for women than women did for men. If by "autonomy" you mean men didn't make it so that women rule the world, it's disingeunous and a very petty thing to be salty over. In other news, FIDE banned transwomen from women's tournaments. Chess tournaments. Men's FIDE chess tourname…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/26 07:43 AM
1

Women make LOTS of awesome RP (other "RP", not "red pill") audio content around sleep aid and anxiety relief, and post it online for free.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 09:49 AM
1

ogres are like onions
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/26 06:21 AM
1

a more passive responsive libido as opposed to a more compulsive libido. I vaguely remember some ancient Asian philosopher saying basically the same thing, and women calling him a misogynist over it. I believe that his name unironically was Dong.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 09:16 AM
2

How do you test if a thing is magnetic and where its poles are? - You take a compass and see if its arrow is attracted/repulsed by it, and if attraction/repulsion is stronger with shorter distance. What are costly, hard to fake signals that you tested right? - This attraction/repulsion pattern stays the same and consistent no matter the environment, and no matter how long you test. Lots of flirty (even if non-sexual) physical contact; very little to no Eww disgust reactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/26 08:27 AM
1

trad women in the past gave bjs (which are considered sinful by Christians) Apparently there was a case of a guy convicted under sodomy laws for getting a consensual BJ from his wife. In the US, in 1988. https://www.upi.com/Archives/1989/07/25/ACLU-will-test-sodomy-law-in-heterosexual-case/9972617342400/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 08:52 PM
1

Food is there so people don't LITERALLY DIE OF STARVATION; tampons became mandatory in 2018 in NY state schools; food in 2025. Men don't have "shitty eating habits"; processed food is produced with the female norm in mind; most women don't pay enough in taxes to cover their own school education and retirement, they never pay anything in healthcare or climate change costs. Holy fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:52 AM
1

Most workplaces have unisex bathrooms anyway, ... Breast pumping rooms are not necessary, "Workplaces with more than 15 employees are traditionally required to provide gender-segregated facilities. OSHA guidance allows unisex options if they are either: Single-occupancy rooms with a locking door. [or] Multi-occupancy facilities with lockable, floor-to-ceiling single-occupant stalls that ensure full privacy... All unisex restrooms must meet Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards" "The PU…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/26 12:48 AM
0

I don't get it. You think providing accomodation for people with different needs than you is bad? Men require more protein-rich food and more calories and fibers but stricter, careful consumption of carbohydrates and oxalates to stay alive, healthy, and active; also, men consume more of all vitamins and all micro-elements except calcium within the same activity level. Show me one workplace that provides men with these things at the expense of women. You can't. I looked. And in my experience free…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 07:03 PM
2

chance to get screwed for life is basically zero: Like honestly most of the time you're not gonna get abused You supposedly fought for the right to leave at any moment for any reason, and won. No woman alive today is dependent on a man against her will.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 04:52 PM
1

All that women ask is to fuse the two so that they may be able to work alongside you And a separate bathroom with free pads and tampons, a locker/changing room, a handful of strictly-female drugs (including contraceptives) and specialists included in workplace's insurance plan, a personal schedule and food/bathroom break privileges if she gets pregnant, keeping her workplace after her while she is busy giving birth and recovering, even if she never comes back; another, necessary separate breast …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 04:46 PM
1

you ARE gonna get blackmailed a ton if you 100% depend on another person I was supposed to do this a ton as a family provider? Damn, no-one told me.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 03:00 PM
-1

On one hand, I thank you sincerely for actually referencing an actual Red Pill primary source. On the other, there is nothing you are asking that has not already been answered in that article. Including right before the list you are quoting and right after it. they encourage women to submit to men and neglect their careers and basically do almost all of the housework with the assumption that the man will step up and be a good leader. But isn't this a covert contract? "He has to be the guy you wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 02:30 PM
1

but what struck me and somewhat shocked me is who these women were, they were single moms, "post wall" women over 30, and obese women. Wait, I thought they were all inexperienced immature young women whose frontal lobes aren't done developing yet At least this is what I was told when I brought up the study "Life With (or Without) Father: The Benefits of Living With Two Biological Parents Depend on the Father's Antisocial Behavior", Jaffe et al., 2003, showing 10% most antisocial men fathering 27…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 11:25 AM
-3

you will end up taking their space without noticing. If I took a shot each time I saw self-awareness crash into the negative like this, I would have died within two hours. There were 281 women's colleges in the US in the 1960s, 26 today; 1,500 men's colleges, 4 today. Women lost 91% of theirs to coeducation; men, 99.7% of theirs. When RB Ginsburg, Lich Queen of Feminism, delivered court decision forcing VMI (Virginia Military Institute) to open to women, she said: "Virginia's plan to create the …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/26 10:42 AM
1

A really old red pill article once said that women count niceties on fingers: a basket of roses, a dinner out, a theater night, fully absorbing her student debt - one, two, three, four.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 04:20 PM
10

We don't have weird ideas about what constitutes "nice". We have empirical evidence of what women mean when they say "you are a really nice guy". I can't make the point any more clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 12:10 AM
21

Analogy. "smile more" / "age gracefully" / "healthy weight" / "ladylike". You can still find opinion pieces from 10-12 years ago of women categorizing these words as basically enslavement spells, that never truly mean what they mean, and are never used with benevolence - at least not by men. I believe they called these "microaggressions". After 4 decades on this cursed Earth, I can say with confidence that in womanspeak, "You are a really nice guy, ..." always means "brace for impact".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 10:01 PM
0

Woohoo, our favorite Water is Wet Man!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 08:49 PM

Option 2, accelerate into relativistics. "Emotional equilibrium" is for singles. Also, this is almost a plot of Misfits episode. "Any idea why I've got the number 46 on my head?" - "Yes, because you are a fucking Viking."
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 01:15 PM
1

Yes. And why?? Less paperwork. Also "change last name" thing was not transfer of ownership from father to groom, but of privilege from husband to wife. Pussana(,daughter of black)Smith upon marriage with Duke of Bullshire became Lady Pussania, Duchess of Bullshire. None of my ancestors were nobles.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 12:33 PM
1

The way I think about a lot of men at this point https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ejrblm/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_fathers_are_not/ https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1en4f2o/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_husbands_are_not/ is either entirely wrong, or unrepresentative. Men do more chores and child care than ever, carry greater overall workload in hours than their wives or mothers of their children, and assume greater workload relative to their single/chil…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/26 09:35 AM

You did not say anything deserving a proper refutation; just a word diarrhea. I never said that propositional logic is flawed. You hallucinated me saying this and then called me a midwit. This is my last response to you here; you are clearly just in to waste my time.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 04:37 PM
0

Do you think the patriarchy was a more balanced system than what we have today? According to feminist theory, what we have today is the patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 10:21 AM
1

Do you mean that office coffee funds are not consensual, or that you don't believe that groups of ppl should benefit mutually from cooperation, in general? I mean that if you accidentally forget to donate into office coffee fund, or refuse to donate on condition that you will not use coffee machine, or ask your boss to allow you to skip one donation since you are saving money for an expensive purchase, hunks in riot gear will not break into your house, beat the shit out of you, and throw you in …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 02:28 AM
1

Consent. Not how laws work. Neither is "office coffee fund". Sounds like the leading reason men give for not voting, thus voluntarily giving up their right to representation... Men are catching up in life expectancy. Things will balance out as they always do, until the next 'uge habbening.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 01:09 AM
1

I don't understand what the problem is... Like a potluck. Or putting $5 into the office coffee fund. Or dropping something into the church donation plate. It makes the community a nicer place to live. Consent. An easy concept to understand, I was told. It's been centuries since the last guy got thrown in jail for not donating to church. Women register more, and vote more. Even if everyone registers and votes, there are more voting-age women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:23 AM
1

60+% of abortions are done with abortion pill prescribed by ob-gyn (85% female) without any involvement of abortionist surgeon (or however the hell they are called). An average woman's global probability of getting killed is estimated at 2.2 per 100k per year. My probability of paying taxes that I never consented to is 100%. I started working at 16, 2 years before I even had any opportunity to vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:18 AM

all men are liars. this isn't possible because some men are so disabled from birth that they cannot understand or speak language. therefore, they cannot lie to you even as adults. all women want rich men - some women have married and spent their lives with poor men. without ever divorcing. You go, “if I’m driving the speed limit and don’t have expired tags or an open warrant, I’ll [most likely] be fine.” Some cops are mentally unstable, violent, or simply having a bad time, and will ruin your da…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/26 12:05 AM
2

It doesn't seem like you navigate the world as if men and women have an equal chance of killing you without outside intervention. Yes; my mom kinda missed the opportunity while I was in the womb... or fresh out of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 03:43 PM
2

Where in the table does it show dollar-for-dollar benefit overcontribution by men? First link: Third to last column: "OASDI contributions (thousands of dollars) / Total". Lines 2 and 3: "Men / Women". Men's contributions (511,711,811) minus women's contributions (356,007,202) equals 155,704,609 thousand, or $155.7 billion - men's contributions above women's baseline. Second link Table 5.A1, take average benefit, multiply by number of beneficiaries, and multiply by 12 to convert monthly numbers i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 03:00 PM
2

Even GENEROUSLY ignoring that fake history is never relevant, I don't see how any of this justifies holding men in indentured servitude by threats of legal action, and their own wives and daughters hostage under threat of poverty.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 01:36 PM
3

What unit are you using? As a rough estimate, we can assume all assets as worthless and concentrate on money redistributed away from its earners without their consent. Quoting from my older post: 2017 annual, USA: men's overcontribution into American social security system for the first time ever exceeds women's baseline by $150 billion (18% of all contributions); same year, men received only around 4% more benefits. The vast majority of this disparity got redistributed as ordinary retirement be…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 05:48 AM
1

It's like debating which ice cream flavor is the best while trying to be objective... There are many ways to frame women being just as bad or worse because there is no one measurable standard. I am not forced at state's gun point to buy certain flavors of ice cream to balance out warehouse stocks that no-one wants to buy otherwise. If I was, it would by itself indicate that the flavor requiring "motivated demand" is probably worse and uncompetitive. I am forced to share workplaces, public servic…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/01/26 05:09 AM
4

this_is_bait.gif my question is: name something that you can say about everyone of YOUR gender. There is nothing; "actual smart people" grew out of propositional logic in antiquity and syllogisms in medieval times, and moved on to odds ratios and effect sizes in the 1940s. The closest we have to real-life objects truly having universal properties are atoms of the same chemical element. Even at level of molecules things get wobbly. No, I don't think I will "behold, a man".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:38 PM
3

Guys with motorized vibrating fleshlights == Android users (badumtssssss)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 12:52 PM
4

pleasant, peaceful, friendly / a godly woman There are no plastic surgeries for these.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 12:36 PM
0

I can think of only three other signs that a woman is genuinely desired and not just settled for. 1) She is not a neurotic mess keeping her partner walking on eggshells. 2) Her partner is not a fuckboy with N-count in the hundreds and ability to pair-bond pulverized (by friction, badumtss). 3) She maintains an extant waistline.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 12:22 PM
2

that doesn’t mean most women think it applies to them Then they are inconsistent in their beliefs. According to feminism, the patriarchy is universal force that cannot be avoided or dodged or deflected individually.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:49 AM
-2

Women self-report wanting divorce more in 2/3rds of divorced couples; women have been initiating the majority of divorces by paper trail since year 1867. We do not accept constructive criticism.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 11:47 AM
3

I know for certain that most women believe the label "Feminist" describes them either very well, or somewhat well. Compulsory heterosexuality is part of feminist theory. I think on the scale of 0 to 10, very few women (especially young) would rate this theory's merit at 0.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:15 AM
2

Google -> "Compulsory heterosexuality".
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 06:03 AM
1

They are both living in a country with legalized same-sex marriage, yet the guy still chooses to date women. Most women are genuinely desired by most men. Most women's complaints about "placeholders", "starter wives", etc., are that a certain woman is not the most desired by a certain man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 03:21 AM
2

Does society pressure men into relationships with women they do not truly want to be with? Yes but not in ways you are mentioning. Men are typically seen as losers \ There is also pressure Could not care less. However, the US's married tax deduction is effectively a bachelor tax, while spousal retirement benefits paid to divorcees is effectively an incentive not to stay married. Other countries have similar but no less messed up practices. Also the only "muh wage gap" that truly exists is betwee…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:16 AM
2

Young men are not institutionally trained to see their mothers as class enemy, their fathers as brainwashed collaborators of class enemy, and their own sexuality and desires as artificial induced effect of psychological warfare. Underestimating the effects of feminism on women, and painting feminism as "just the right to vote, drive, and hold a job", are either errors, or lies. Take all the anti-parent rebellious angst a guy might have towards his parents' opinions on his dating choices, and mul…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/26 02:04 AM
3

Gender similarity analogy falls apart at these points: one, women are on a timer in ways that men are not (men have their own timer, but it's incomparably less relevant); nobody cares how well her views have evolved by the moment she runs out of eggs. Two, most young women are feminists, and there is no male equivalent to it. If a 22 year old "Chad or an average guy" starts making nonsense decisions, and his own mother tells him "Dude, slow down", he will not accuse her of trying to matriarchall…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/26 08:50 AM
-1

My opinion is, why not admit that the standards for women have to be lower and set lower standards for women and let them fight in an all-female army? If women asked the government to give them their own army, the government would ask if they want it tied, wrapped, or in a box, and instantly introduce a new tax on mostly married men in order to cover the expenses. You can't just set lower standards because a cartridge with a bullet capable of piercing enemy combatant's standard body armor - befo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 09:38 PM
1

I answered. You answered with just world fallacy, not evidence. I don't have time to explain fallacies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 05:35 PM
1

I am not asking what anything is proving, I am asking what is YOUR evidence, and what are its confidence levels, odds ratios, and effect sizes. If you can't answer, then the answer is "I have none, I'm talking out of arse." usually act like he does. Not a metric. a karen Not a metric. Well, she’s a felon or helps out felon 64% if male felons' children are mothered by non-felons. At least. He’s a druggie? She’s most likely a druggie? Source? Confidence level? Odds ratios? Effect sizes?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:49 PM
2

No; YOU answer the damn question. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1qf42f1/you_cant_trust_a_mans_observational_skill_on/o042vaw/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 04:13 PM
2

that convicted felons reproduce at a higher rate than the average man, and the most violent reproduce even more? No; that effect is consistently higher for convicted felon men than for convicted felon women across every measured axis (more anti-STI drug prescription, more children, more marriages if ever married, more reproductive partners, higher effect of violence than of theft conviction; also, more likely to be married by raw estimate for men convicted once than for any other category, inclu…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:30 PM
2

It is every parent's problem that their child has to attend school together with violent unstable children fathered by violent unstable men just because their moms found those men kinda cute.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 03:22 PM
1

Good, with strawmen (that NO-ONE made) out of the way, we're still waiting on the evidence. The claim is: “Men see so many times women dating and sleeping with absolute scum” but they never question: What is SHE like? Is she also scum? Could she not be stable? Okay, and what is she like, how is she a scum, and what are effect sizes and odds ratios?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:51 PM
0

They are free to leave at any moment. Instead, they spent the last 60+ years inserting themselves into every men's space and making it illegal to create new ones. This is not the behavior of people reasonably cautious for their safety. They could have (scare-quotes) "harassment-free" workplaces today if they wanted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:47 PM
1

No; OP is making a positive claim right here: The claim is: “Men see so many times women dating and sleeping with absolute scum” but they never question: What is SHE like? Is she also scum? Could she not be stable? Last thread I brought her evidence that convicted felons are more reproducing, and convicted felon men even more so, and among them violent convicts are also twice as successful as property criminals by raw estimate, and 5+ by adjusted. She said well basically it's only very specific …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:45 PM
0

only the men women have sex with, right? No. But enough for it to be everyone's problem. Adults have switched to odds ratios and effect sizes in the 1940s.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 01:30 PM
6

No study ever has shown that all men are rapists or murderers either.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 05:48 AM
10

If you have reliable, statistically significant, peer-reviewed evidence that only certain subtypes of women are "like that", you had literal years to bring it to our attention and inform us of its odds ratios and effect sizes.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 05:26 AM
1

https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ko138w/mortality_in_relation_to_sex_in_the_affluent/ This image from 8 months ago shows how recently relative mortality rate between men and women was almost identical, and how quickly it diverged; I thought it was only in early-mid 19th century and diverged slowly. Source in comment. Please note diagonal "cold stripes": people born in certain short time periods got and maintained lower mortality rate throughout their lives (reverse for "hot stripes"…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 02:39 AM
-2

My SO who is also mother of my child is my biggest fan. Everything I believe is formed by and derived from combination of research and experience of being responsible adult loyal risk-averse family breadwinner. Since my SO is not a psychopath, she does not find my beliefs disagreeable.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/26 01:14 AM
2

Because women are not "heterosexual" in the same sense men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 06:56 AM
1

If you actually bothered to read the paper that I linked so many times, you would know that it referenced earlier papers operating on metrics of "badness" other than felony conviction, and the vast majority of them landed at positive result with some statistical significance for both sexes, and higher effect for chasing bad boys than chasing bad girls, which means that Yes, while men as a demographic have their own blind spots, women are not the ones they should be taking criticism from, especia…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 06:12 AM
22

the causes are never considered and the man leaving these women are never considered. The child could have been conceived with donor sperm. Or in a one-night stand. Or she could have dumped him. Or he could have dumped her after finding out that the baby is from an affair with another guy. The immediate, knee-jerk assumption that "no dad in the picture" == "he's an asshole who dumped her and his own baby through NO FAULT of her own" is one of those "subconscious drivers" that can and should be u…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/26 03:30 AM
1

Voight-Kampff for the win.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 08:47 PM
1

"What do you think, Space King?"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 08:41 PM
1

not all women want to fuck felons NO-ONE says that ALL women want to fuck felons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 07:54 PM
3

"Here is objective nationwide data spanning three decades" "Lol this is why you can't get laid with a normal chick" Totally adult behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 06:01 PM
4

Redpill men complain about women “choosing wrong,” but they can’t even detect wrong unless it comes with a mugshot. While women can't EVEN when it comes with a mugshot. Redpill moral reasoning is not felony-based. Felony is just the ultimate uncontestable marker. Not all assholes are violent felons. Basically all violent felons are assholes. Syllogisms should be taught in school; I am not getting paid for explaining this. This problem might also related to the types of women they know. Or it mig…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 05:32 PM
1

Their definition of “good man” often means “not a criminal.” Stopped reading here; make the same post, get the same response: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1q6b5gu/men_stop_expecting_praiserewards_for_not/ny6qnpl/
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:54 PM
1

No gender targets other gender for their sex and gender, but women's track record is marginally worse: when committing ANY type of violence, women are more likely than men to target a person of the opposite sex - violence generally, against a stranger, a relative, an intimate partner, or a child. Women do less violence generally, but last time I checked, wobbly weak-ass upper body, being a bad shot, and making IEDs with shitty dysfunctional fuses were not among religious or secular virtues.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 04:13 PM
1

And what does that have to do with anything we are discussing? EXACTLY. Circumcision predates writing, and thus, predates feminism by millenia. "Circumcision is not exactly feminist invention" is as irrelevant as it can get. I'll have to quote myself. I have only so much time to waste proving that water is wet, and the statement "The worst the average woman does is ignore men" is false. I have touched only on three things - abortion, neonaticide, and circumcision, leaving everything related to d…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:38 PM
0

simular hateful rhetoric by men is found all over the Internet Internet is a large place, but most public platforms ban such men on sight. But not women. And men build movements around taking away women's rights. No. As example, the right to vote for president in the US is not and never has been universal, is directly enjoyed ONLY by 538 persons, and is denied entirely to citizens of territories (despite their MEN being subject to draft). Thus, women's constant whining that they couldn't even vo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:11 PM
0

"Kill all women", "all women are disgusting", "all mothers are disgusting child abusers", ... "woohoo women are going extinct, finally, mother nature knows best!!!" - I forgive you if you aren't aware, but all of these are gender-swapped somewhat paraphrased actual viral social media posts, comments, and snippets of op-eds made in the last 10-15 years. Someone gave this content its hundreds of thousands of reposts and likes. And it were not men. So, No, OP post does not suggest that ignoring men…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 01:54 PM
3

The worst the average woman does is ignore men. No matter how many times this lie gets repeated, it stays the funniest joke Reddit-wide. It's like a 4chan meme on steroids. Stupid, obviously wrong, but squeezes a chuckle out anyway every time.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 01:04 PM
0

No you dishonest liar; I said absolutely nothing about women making money or not at any specific point in time, but this is also a lie. Also, even if OP is in her 40s, she was born in the 80s - the time of historically all-time-high divorces, abortions, and births out of wedlock. Statistically, her peers did not "see their mothers trapped in violent marriages"; a huge chunk of them simply never knew dads or saw their faces.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 11:16 AM
-1

.I.R.R.E.L.E.V.A.N.T. ALL objective data on the topic we have indicate that women DO NOT stay out of marriages. They marry and then divorce once equitable division of assets laws kick in, and the assets themselves reach the size of a decent house. Not all, not always, but this narrative that women used to get trapped totes against their will in unwanted marriages, and now when they finally got the ability not to, they massively stay single, is pure fiction, to the last word (women initiate the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:53 AM
1

Yes, which again speaks AGAINST OP's point that women supposedly stay out of marriage. Family-oriented men, even if their marriage fails, still have someone to marry - not just "someone" but also someone at least 6 years younger in 38% of cases.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 03:37 AM
1

THERE. ARE. MORE. NEVER. MARRIED. MEN. THAN. WOMEN. Consistently. In. All. Reliably. Recorded. Years.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/26 02:34 AM
1

Most reasonable men past 30 understand that women aren't that into men in general, so it does not matter what women like or prefer; only what they consent to. No; this is the bottom line.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/26 12:58 AM
1

But demanding to see your tampons on the first date would still be a dick move. Same as demanding 100k as entry-level condition to even be considered for a relationship. Except men's income often grows with experience, while women's fertility always falls with age. My late dad used to say that a real woman doesn't seek an accomplished man, but makes one. He was an idiot. All women are real women.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 04:24 PM
2

"To be clear, openly expecting a partner to fund luxury trips, expensive homes, or shopping trips is understandably off-putting, and that’s not what’s being defended here. A $100,000 salary does not buy that lifestyle anyway. In today’s economy, it typically supports a fairly standard middle-class life." - To be clear, openly expecting a full football team of sons and full cheerleader team of daughters is understandably off-putting, and that's not what's being defended here. A woman having her p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 03:17 PM
2

Anyone who wants to own a home, raise children, Great point. Scenario: you go on a first date with a guy; he meets you in a modest but tasteful coffee place, and after 10 minutes of small talk, asks you to open your purse and show him your tampons. After your perfectly reasonable "WHAT~?!!!!!!!111", he calmly offers his spermogram in return and explains that with all the chemicals in the water, microplastics in the soil, and radioisotopes in the air, he is too family-oriented to waste time on wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 02:49 PM
1

Putting aside personal biases (yes, a self-declared blue pill man probably "sees" mostly guys and girls that confirm his biases - that is, hivemind oppressor class-enemy monsters who are also pathetic losers at the same time, and their victims that rightfully see them as such), I think it's still apt analogy. Wine still spoils. It's risky to put any beverage within you if it spent more than 20 years in a bottle (among other reasons, because glass toxicity standards were softer). However, with wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 12:00 PM
2

Google - "The Longhouse". Women. The power of the Demons, spirits I command Always by my side to serve the master's plan... Powaaah (Powah Powah Powah) Powaaah??? (Powah Powah Powah) Pawaaah! - Pawaaaaaa~ah!?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/01/26 09:17 AM
1

and dress like its 2015 still. Unacceptable. Real men dress like it's still World War I.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/26 09:59 PM
3

Don't know. Never was in this situation and never will be.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:48 PM
44

"I don't like your tone", the thread
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 06:46 PM
3

The source does not confirm your claim, its details are paywalled, and it relied (successfully) on average nurse's inability to tell "A leading cause" and "THE leading cause" apart. Any cause can be "A leading cause" depending on how you define "leading". Another very similar paper compared pregnancy-related deaths in 12 months to homicide mortality in 21 months. No; American pregnant women's main threats to their own lives stay the same: their own age, fat, and history.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/01/26 05:00 PM
5

and murder by your partner or ex is the most common death for pregnant women in the us It isn't. So your evidence all these people is simply that “their lying” You are either lying right now, or quoting lying "midwives". No the nurses will continue to help those women Scaring pregnant women with politicized nonsense is not "helping", it's terrorism.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:37 PM
2

Men in reality: https://xkcd.com/3172/
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 08:13 PM
5

The largest effect observed by this study is silver split when man is depressed; figure 3 page 17. They had to use conjunction of three different math-e-magical models to justify not mentioning it in the abstract.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 07:54 PM
2

Because they're human I suppose. (rag'n'bone man voice) "OoOoOoOooh!~" It might help for someone to get some money together... and can't cause very much harm Someone "getting together" some "escape money" instead of spending it on treatment can cause very much harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 07:06 PM
1

This: https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ko138w/mortality_in_relation_to_sex_in_the_affluent/ In case it's hard to digest: around year 2000 excess male mortality in peaceful, affluent countries exceeded what it was during WW2, in all age groups, including those when men can't yet guzzle booze, drive recklessly, or chain-smoke. Gaming "on easy mode" means your virtual character is less likely to die. Yes, your character is also rewarded more for completing most trivial tasks, but this …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:14 PM
1

"Captain Falcon Kick rightfully diagnosed that people only commit violence because the state isn't big enough" - The Little Platoon, on "The Falcon and the Winter Soldier".
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:14 PM
1

Men, stop expecting praise/rewards for not committing crimes nor cheating. Never did. They only see assholes as dangerous felons or cheaters. False. I see dangerous felons as reference assholes, high-purity and crystallized. Therefore, when women say that No, women don't chase assholes ackshully, I bring statistics on sexual and reproductive success of felons as evidence that even these, most assholeish of assholes, get laid more than an average chump. Thus, I accept a higher burden of proof - I…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/01/26 12:12 PM
2

/u/sublimemongrel Replying here because I can't reply to a comment chain with a user abusing block function. What does that even mean in a mutual trade with men of different skill sets where you aren’t relying on men to provide/protect like she was saying? You are arguing your tax burden makes you equivalent to those men doing the hard labor? So your reliance on bigger and stronger men who make your life easier and safer and provide the goods you want to buy is somehow different from women in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/26 12:03 PM
0

None of this refutes anything I've said. Each of my points refutes everything you've said. If you are not completely self-sufficient I am equivalently self-sufficient, most women are not. I provide enough of my value to farmers and apparel workers and builders for them to provide me with food and clothes and housing. On top of that, ~40% of my income is taken away by the state to redistribute in favor of women other than the ones that love me. on bigger stronger men No, I am in mutual trade with…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 11:49 PM
0

Most men perform hard, manual, ungrateful, dangerous, essential but low-paying labor at some point in their lives, until their skill set makes it a waste to keep them doing it, and they start performing labor of value exceeding that of subsistence; while most employed full-time women also reach this milestone, they spend way less time in it before they start over-relying on state assistance. As for police, last time I checked, men were 12 times more likely than women to defend themselves with le…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 11:13 PM
-3

Very few males depend on better stronger males for provision and protection, have "women" (plural), and would make good slaves at the same time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 10:53 PM
4

since females no longer depend on males for provision or protection Females do depend on males for provision and protection; simps in power made it so that they get them for free. Assumtion that this is fair and forever is baseless.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 08:42 PM
1

No one talked about being raped though "when daddy subjects mommy to his special hugs, she has no way to prevent pregnancy" equating family cohesion to high fertility is weird Hard disagree. All other things equal (including chosen methods of contraception), cohesive couples have more sex, and couples that have more sex have more children. Individual results may vary, but things smooth out and stack up on population scale. Besides after having read the study, it doesn’t even say that that phones…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 08:39 PM
1

If you believe that all Amish women are raped, go to court. A phone is not contraceptive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 08:08 PM
1

Because when mommy and daddy love each other very much, they share a special hug, and because the Amish do not recognize divorce that we could use as a better indicator.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 07:03 PM
1

"Household phone" or "phone on a farm". Paper is here: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/26/52-26.pdf , although you or someone else can already start skreeching that I dishonestly equate fertility rate to family cohesion. Whatever; hope whoever downvoted my previous comment got motivated to put the cake down.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 06:36 PM
5

If all men seem like shit, and all women seem like queens, the person observing is probably a lesbian.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/26 12:58 PM
1

Sort-of. I develop new kinks, and not randomly. Don't know / don't care, but I think the answer is asymmetrical: women might not choose to be attracted, but choose to be un-attracted. Social media waves of women complaining how men are gross, how male baldness is awful, how men smell terrible, seem to come and go with bursts of social trends and conditioning. There was a study that Amish family cohesion deteriorates after getting a phone. Stay non-obese. Adipose tissue is endocrinally active and…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 07:32 PM

Now let's make bets if Maduro's drug operations were bigger or roughly the same as Hussein's bioweapons stockpile. Also, JD probably: "No! 'Have you considered Vuvuzuela' is a breadtube meme, you boomer!"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/26 04:09 AM

Yes. I don't know for certain when (or if) it was definitely easier as a man; I have not dated as both in every decade of the last 1.5 centuries. I know that my granddad, at 36 and after 11 years in prison, found a wife who gave him 2 sons and stayed with him until the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:21 PM

Depends who you ask. I've seen women here on PPD insisting that women had no choice but to be with men they don't like merely 10-20 years ago or so, in the US. On a more serious note and in more realistic history, time around WW2 (shortly before and a decade or so after) was accompanied by very quick and pronounced trend on widespread early (early-20s) marriages. When people insist that "marrying early was a way of life back then", they usually mean this brief period, as if there was no history …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/26 09:00 PM

what do you think happens when you had the most likely biggest medical event in your life? Early-term abortion is not "the most likely biggest medical event in your life". "There were 5,486 fatal work injuries recorded in the United States in 2022" [commute deaths excluded] "women made up 8.1 percent (445 [cases])" "In 2022, 817 women died of maternal causes in the United States" [abortion complications included] Women, maternal causes + fatal work injuries == 1262 Men, all fatal work injuries -…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 06:46 AM
-1

I implore you to learn what per capita means I implore you to learn what "per year" and "per pregnancy" means. Men work every year, often well into retirement age. Women give birth 1.6 times total. American pregnancy-related death numbers include women dying of cancer or heart attack within 41 days after early-term abortion. Workplace death numbers EXclude deaths in commute. And we didn’t even speak about femizides Femizides don't exist. but 3.7 deaths through workplace injury per 100.000 worker…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 03:34 AM

You need to post your source. On share of employed/unemployed spouses, I already have, but let's repeat - article: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/ graph: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2023/04/13/in-a-growing-share-of-u-s-marriages-husbands-and-wives-earn-about-the-same/st_2023-04-13_breadwinner-wives_02-png/ Twenty-three percent of prime-age married women have zero income, versus six perc…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/26 01:27 AM

So no, 84% of women aren't SAHMs. Does not follow. 84% is share of general population women employed full time among general population women who are employed. The share of SAHM/Ws is known, and it is 23% of married couples. Among the remaining 77% of prime-age married women, around a third are not employed full-time. There are some more errors in your reasoning of various levels of offensiveness, but I picked this as the most obvious; your inability or unwillingness to put a minute of thought i…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/26 04:44 PM
2

"Look at that subtle off-white coloring. The tasteful thickness of it. Oh, my God. It even has a watermark."
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 11:47 PM
-1

23% of families are sole [male] breadwinners ... 16% are sole female breadwinners who work 46 hours No. Six percent are sole female breadwinners; 16% are sole or primary female breadwinners. The same estimate for men - 55%. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/18q2oiu/antimemoryhole_image_hosting_in_year_2022_men_are/ How the fuck do men contribute more? This is how the fuck. Most married women rely on their husbands as primary or sole breadwinners; and 48% do even in childless couples (…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 06:49 AM
-2

If men contribute more because his partner carries the child and goes through child birth and does most of the childcare Men contribute more because men either do so, or stay single, long before children come into picture, or regardless if they do. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/12l5b2u/male_vs_female_income_in_childless_couples/
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/25 06:32 AM
-1

Yes (10+ years together, raising a child), and Yes. Imagining an opponent as smelly virginal neckbearded (and therefore, irrelevant) soyjack is very common here, but most guys who disagree with feminist / mainstream dogma are much better than some people would like to believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:49 PM
1

I can't just walk past "stole masculinity" without remembering Gill-Man and his Coat of Stars. https://np.reddit.com/r/40kLore/comments/9aru46/do_most_imperial_citizens_know_about_the_siege_of/e4xvrdz/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 12:42 PM
5

Dating market follows boom-bust cycles just as any other system with positive feedback loop on delay. When humanity goes through transition to new modes of production, or ways of trade, or financial reforms, or literally anything that creates opportunity, men grab this opportunity to create wealth. Most fail, but as "nouveau riche" men emerge in any tangible quantity, making old hierarchies almost irrelevant, women drop their pursuits of education and career, remove their (metaphorical or physic…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/12/25 07:24 AM
2

Imagine being an adult, moving the goalpost, and expecting everyone not to notice. No, good for everyone. Good. This is what the post is about. Good men doing good things.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 12:24 PM
7

Any woman who thinks that a man must meet eight thresholds to fit her understaning of "good" ("kind, considerate, funny"...), better also have eight things to offer in exchange. Something like "No bad habits, 25% body fat, mint condition pussy, full of fresh eggs, no body modifications, a beast in bed with orgasms on full auto, swan loyalty, a smile to die for". Virtually everything around you that makes your royal lifestyle possible is produced by men trying to support their families... and a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/25 01:01 AM
2

Different strokes, different folks. Some do, some don't. after lurking on this sub and reading some stuff about how men get better sex from women who were virgins Lower chances of divorce, not better sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 09:58 AM
-3

So please tell me what that secret solution is. Healthy weight, not ridiculously early or advanced age, abstaining from bad habits, regular and accurately done medical tests and checkups through whole duration of pregnancy, reasonable pause between pregnancies. huge effects on a person's body, biology, health, whatever, for the rest of their life, and certainly not to the point that some people end up disabled from it, yes...? ... It's hard to listen to y'all when what you're saying is basically…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/25 12:53 AM
4

(chuckle) Speedrun marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/25 08:17 AM

Assuming she is NOT a surrogate, No, because the basis for child support is custodial parent filing for it, not gender or fulness of custody. By your conditions, a woman completed her role in reproduction, and the father has full custody. These two conditions are not sufficient for her to have to pay child support. Men rarely file for child support even when having primary or full custody because men can work and earn normally by themselves, don't like bothering the state with petty stuff, and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 06:25 PM

"Question for RedPill: Checkmate, Atheists" Okay. Assumptions made in the OP: The only argument for "walk away" rights is abortion - it isn't Women never get pregnant by raping men - they do Giving babies up for adoption by mothers is not a thing - it is Mothers giving babies up for adoption are as liable for child support as fathers abandoning their babies - they aren't Baby Moses laws don't exist - they do Okay baby Moses laws do exist but for good reasons - the reason is if you don't allow wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/25 11:19 AM
3

What is your ideal partner like? Abilities: Superhuman strength, speed, durability, agility, balance and reflexes | Telekinesis | Flight | Telepathy | Precognition | Reality Selection | Future life power acquisition | Portal manipulation | Pocket dimension | Reality manipulation | Matter and energy manipulation | Transmutation | Power blasts | Time manipulation
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:50 PM
1

ADDENDUM Several things you seem to have missed "on your side" of the argument. On demographic level: there is much stronger evidence that women might be better surgeons than men than your sources indicate. Women are much more likely than men to donate organs to their spouses, and constitute close to or slightly over half of industrial pharmaceutical production staff in the West (probably the most crucial involvement in workforce than all others combined). This does not change my stance fundamen…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:27 PM
1

Condensing responses to multiple points into shorter paragraphs: PRODUCE AND SACRIFICE: What is a freeloader: one who does nothing, or whose value input is a net negative? - I go with the latter. Question is, how do we measure value (we will get to "is it fair" later). SI lists seven fundamental quantities: time, mass, length, current, temperature, amount of substance, and luminous intensity. Taking them as "value", every year, men produce more physical commodities by an OOOOFF margin, above a) …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/25 09:23 PM
1

I am working on the reply; your efforts are appreciated; I just found how to solve a problem that I was stuck on at work for several weeks and had to redirect and focus the efforts there.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 09:32 AM

Red Pillers have a shallow view of attraction and women should be more than just young and hot Ideally, women should be loving, loyal, compassionate, trustworthy; someone a man can unclench and exhale next to. Since we can't have any of those, because such women are non-existent, lesbian, or taken, young and hot is what remains. This idea that there is a huge cohort of men that is outright repulsed by professional women is delusional. If anything high-status men are more likely to choose a succe…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/25 12:06 PM
1

No; there is no point in "dating" without sex, and there is no point in sex if she doesn't like it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 09:01 PM
1

Send me the source on that first claim. [higher share of women among farmland owners impacts national food security negatively] Women have been important historically Share of women farm owners here, food security here, remove records where less than both data points are known. Correl and Pearson give -0.21. Not an iron proof, but nice reality check. My older analysis was on larger and older data set, and used net food exports as proxy of food security; the result was basically the same. I agree…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 05:03 PM
1

Decorating is what women do We're on different wavelengths from the start if you begin with taking a metaphor literally. collecting food, working on fields ... And nowadays, women are dentists Last time I ran numbers, higher share of women among farmland owners impacts national food security negatively, with exception of countries that are mostly deserts. The "women make up 51% of farmers" non-stat is a myth based on including non-commercial backyard cucumbers. Argiculture as we know it today wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/25 02:18 AM
1

For abuse, cheating, and slobbery to justify women initiating twice as many divorces as men, some combination of the following MUST be true: Up to 43% of men are cheaters, abusers, or slobs (28% dumped by their wives + 15ish% never married); Men cheaters, abusers, and/or slobs outnumber their female counterparts anywhere up to 2:1 (going by divorce initiators); 6% of male population are never married above female baseline; 14% of male population are dumped by their spouses above female baseline …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 04:03 PM
1

Since we're going by vibes and perceptions here rather than numbers, the best analogy I heard in RP circles was "Men build, women decorate". Decorators are not freeloaders. But, you can live in an undecorated house; you can't decorate a house that does not exist. One detail that very, VERY often gets lost in details (pardon the tautology), is that "the biggest freeloaders" among women are single, never married, and childless. Not necessarily most consooming, but statistically most reliant on sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 09:18 AM
3

So, you have no sources other than "trust me brah". When there was scandal that Foxconn exploits poor women to suicidal ideation, I got arsed, grabbed a leaked photo of their lunch break, and counted male and female faces. Men outnumbered women 3:1.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 09:14 AM
4

I am 100% certain these numbers are false. Not even 99%. Edit: what did I tell ya. Bullshoite. https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1accvcl/gender_racial_diversity_of_usa_employees_at/
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 08:48 AM
-1

Sure, we all know that women never ever ever stay with inconsiderate slobbish effortless cheaters or abusers. I can only repeat my top comment. "These women would have done less damage if they stayed single". And if men are as "ain't shit" as you all here insist, women should.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/25 08:45 AM
3

Friggin reddit saw me posting from another device, yeeted my account, and now refuses to show my comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 10:40 PM
2

Men are dumb No. and vote However the Hell they choose and desire, which is the entire point. Women (thus far) still have the majority of votes, and could out-vote men on literally anything. Are women also dumb since they didn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/25 03:33 PM
1

The precise wording of the survey is, "between you and [partner], who wanted the [divorce/separation] more?" Neither the word "initiate", nor "paperwork", get any mention in the survey's questionnaire. I call it "who initiated" for brevity.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 09:28 PM
5

"Two-thirds" estimate comes from HCMST survey, not "who filed the paperwork". By "who filed the paperwork", it's even higher.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:18 AM
3

It does not excuse him; it also does not justify healing and befriending a murderous, torturous, blood-thirsty monster out of egg solidarity and unleashing it onto a castle full of non-accomplice service personnel. If I had a problem with men dying in films, I would have nothing to watch.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 11:15 AM
2

I have no "feelings" towards "women" as a whole. Single/married/divorced, mothers/childless - these two criteria already create six sub-groups of women with very different... basically everything. However! I consider prevalence of divorces among the worst damages to society at large. So, with half of first marriages ending in divorce before 20th anniversary, and two-thirds of divorces initiated by women, I do have a problem with these particular women. Divorces create a massive ripple effect tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/25 10:10 AM
18

My brief Googling tells that Meta Platforms, video games, and alcohol, each, generate significantly more revenue than filmed tiddies worldwide, with alcohol leading by a factor of 24. Most "actresses" of adult genre are not quite "professional"; they treat their roles as quick easy side gig money, don't stay in the industry for long, mostly painfully average in looks, and their makeup usually looks like they did it themselves. So, my CYV is that No, social media and dating sites don't have "the …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 05:33 PM
2

2 is potential DickeDex of STIs. Dick isn't a paired organ (neither is blood, or immune system); I don't have a spare. Buddies, roomies, and co-parents with 1 (IVF is still allowed, right?), because this is what relationship without sex is, and since I can make her "play whatever role I want her to play", I want her to know her place in this relationship. She is not a girlfriend, not a wife, not a lover; she can keep her "non-sexual affection" to herself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 03:18 PM

an asylum for the criminally insane is not much better than prison Which is why no person ever has pleaded insanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 02:03 PM
0

disallowed from wielding theirs (physical strength) over women Men's power is the male brain. Physical strength is what slaves were valued for.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 11:56 AM

ThEeEeEeEeN: A father can kill his children (often, honor killings, daughter is murdered) and he can pardon himself. NoOoOoOoW: a father in Iran who commits an “honor killing” of his own child is immune from the death penalty under current law. sentenced to a few years in prison Good; not only you lied; you admitted to lying knowingly.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 11:46 AM

Postpartum psychosis and depression are not the same thing (high comorbidity rate tho) Iran punishes honor killings with prison sentences; and, of course, the defendant cannot just "pardon himself". Glad we both learned something new today.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/25 08:22 AM
-1

Not allowing women to travel abroad for international chess events would be a precaution to make sure that women stay oppressed. Iran allows them. Afghanistan banned chess entirely. Amish fertility rates are high because they eschew birth control. Presence of a phone impacts fertility rate negatively. UMC people generally prefer quality over quantity https://np.reddit.com/r/Natalism/comments/1bwxsuj/total_us_fertility_rate_by_family_income/ It's more complex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:34 PM
-1

Iran maintains state-sponsored program and school network for exceptionally talented girls. Maryam Mirzakhani attended and graduated one. You know less than nothing and can't even get arsed to Google things.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 01:15 PM
1

"Religious families having and enforcing their own rules of life have nothing to do with the state oppressing women." Sharif University of Technology is not private.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 12:27 PM
-2

Then Iran is a terrible example; the country with strong international presence of female chess players and which raised the first woman to win Fields medal doesn't strike me as "taking every precaution to make sure that women stay oppressed". In the US, you don't need to cross the Atlantic; there are examples of things working at hand. https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol52/26/52-26.pdf I actually heard of this research years ago, but didn't bother to look into it until now. A curio…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 10:37 AM
-3

You brought up Iran as proof that laws have very little to do with divorce and fertility rates... and yet, Iran has stricter laws on women than the US, and higher fertility rates, and lower rates of divorce. I am not as well-versed in Islamic law as in Christian one. Feminists lied about Christian marriage (you can read Gratian's decree for details), there is no reason for me to believe they are honest about Islamic one. Almost everything invented by American Ministry of Invasion about the Islam…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 10:14 AM
1

Girls can be married at 9. "Marriageable age is defined at 13 years for girls and 15 years for boys" - Wikipedia Singing is forbidden for women. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG2id5Md-lk This one actually moved to the US; congrats; one of your points stands. A father can kill his children (often, honor killings, daughter is murdered) and he can pardon himself. A US woman can kill her entire family and get diagnosed with depression. with the capital Tehran leading the way, where around 30% of m…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 09:12 AM
5

The doctrine is not laid out unambiguously; it is published, and only then takes effect. You are pissing on the manosphere for not reacting to an event that has not happened. When the text of new doctrine is available, when it prescribes higher casualties, you will have a point. Until then, casualties of entire Afghan war are eclipsed by civilian male suicide every year. "The manosphere" does not owe you shared hysteria over a showman delivering a speech.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 12:35 AM
5

I have; the doctrine has not been updated since '23. So your itch to draw attention to the part where you outright lied is misplaced.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/25 12:25 AM
2

the vast majority of women and a good chunk of men will be kicked out of the military more men... being maimed and killed Does not follow. And No, "the manosphere' is not "we want more women to die".
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 10:26 PM
0

Men want women to settle for them And they also don't want women to "settle" for their "looksmatch" or whatever, they want "Chad treatment". Contents of the post contradict its title. Dzeb00nkedth.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 07:12 PM
-2

...You know what, No. If I was a single 35+yo man, exposing myself to STI risk for what is potentially a dead-end relationship with already a ton of baggage sounds like not a plan.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 12:55 PM
4

Nothing says unbiased impartial observation like using "dudes" and "women" in the same sentence, twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/25 11:50 AM
9

Dance classes may not be functional alternatives to dating apps, but they sure as Hell are powerful red pill dispensers. There could be 20 women per 4 men in a class, and all those women still would drool over the chance to work with the same one guy, and do unmistakable Eww faces when they have to dance with any other.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 11:02 AM

Men in reality: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ejVO15YR8JQ
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 09:04 AM
2

If men are as successful as you say they there is zero reason they should be making their children support payments nor zero leniency to those who can't. All I hear is "I don't understant consent". You are not alone. Women are actually worse at paying child support than men: around 30% of custodial parent women receive no child support of the amount awarded or agreed upon, versus 40% of custodial parent men; meanwhile, 46% of custodial parent women receive full amount, versus 43% of custodial pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 12:28 AM
2

There are millions of deadbeat fathers who owe billions in un paid child suppot each and every year. Men overcontribute into social security system 14 times more than both men and women underpay in child support, or roughly 1.8 times more than child support deficit and cost of all prisons combined. Women are actually worse at paying child support than men: around 30% of custodial parent women receive no child support of the amount awarded or agreed upon, versus 40% of custodial parent men; meanw…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/25 12:12 AM
4

the vast, vast majority of the most crazy, horrible, evil shit that happens is entirely done by men Women commit 100% of deliberate terminations of pregnancy for no medical or moral reason (~1m.), of paternity frauds (~100k), of taking addictive drugs while in late stages of pregnancy (~25k), of taking addictive drugs while breastfeeding (unknown), and of inducing fetal alcohol syndrome (~1k). Every year, only in the US. We just kinda-sorta arbitrarily decided that these things don't count, arou…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 11:12 PM
1

Fantasy and sci-fi mostly.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/25 08:46 AM

How do we explain all the native tribes that were matriarchal, before colonization? 90ish percent of "sources" on these tribes either parrot "Ancient Society" by Lewis H. Morgan, or parrot biases formed under this book's influence. The book is written by a guy adopted into a Native American tribe, predates rigorous scientific method by a full century, and is unfortunately popularized way above its merit by Engels.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:53 PM
3

There were 336 confirmed attacks involving chemical weapons in Syria between 23 December 2012 and 18 January 2019. European NATO armed forces proudly have lower entry standards for women, and the US, where such practice would be unconstitutional, have seen zero women successfully completing Navy SEAL training in eight years. A female soldier is better than nothing, the problem remains that there are zero mass-produced automatic weapons designed by women - EVER; so, going back to your original co…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 09:14 PM
4

Yes, they look gorgeous on photos. With that long hair that definitely never gets in the way in close-quarters, never gets infested with bugs in the field, and never hinders their ability to put an insulating gas mask on in case of chemical warfare agent attack. What I'm saying is that they never do any of these thigs, and many others.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:51 PM
2

Undeniable evidence of clear labor statistics and data show that women take upon themselves the majority of time load of raising children, not wholly. You cannot kick the goalpost half a mile away and expect me not to notice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:16 PM
4

I can't stress this enough, THE ONLY PEOPLE viewing women as wholly responsible for the physical and mental load of raising children... are man-hating feminists. In reality, https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ejrblm/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_fathers_are_not/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 08:09 PM
2

Under generous assumption that women can design automatic weapons, create and maintain the supply/production chain of parts and materials for them, and for the ammo (which is arguably harder), and for the cleaning/maintenance chemicals, that "good" women can and will shoot them with efficiency to neutralize "the bad ones", and through it all, stay beautiful, calm, friendly, and clean, your argument collapses into a circle. "Women are superior humans because women are superhuman." In raw, unvarni…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 07:11 PM
12

What am I missing? TB, smallpox, polio, cholera, 16-hour-long work days, 80% of income spent on bare necessities, bed bugs. "Missing", get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 05:37 PM
1

Have you had sexual thoughts of other people whilst in a committed relationship? Of other real people, No. But I'm a huge fan of erotic fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 01:48 PM
2

Other things "it's hard to imagine believing in and building a socially and emotionally fulfilling life": personal death without reincarnation/resurrection, second law of thermodynamics/heat death of the Universe, karmic-less Universe where there is no justice except the one that people make and enforce, the government not having your best interests in mind, recognition that fortune-telling / crystal-healing / MLMs are scams. Indeed, SO many people seem to be living just fine while not having ac…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/25 11:16 AM

https://explosm.net/comics/still-like-you#comic "i'm in this photo and i don't like it"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 05:36 PM
1

What do you think is the biggest hurdle toward empathy for men? Biology. We are programmed to be empathetic to children. Women are more neotenous than men for the most of their lives. As for social factors, the biggest (I believe) is women making up the majority of voters; we can almost perfectly track "rises and falls" of feminism (the "malez aint shit" type feminism) with how much women outnumbered men. However, things are shifting; there are more boys than girls born, and men are catching up …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 09:05 AM
-1

"Under capitalism, man exploits man; while under socialism just the reverse is true."
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 08:49 AM
3

Marriage and weddings are social engineering, did you know ? And very very lucrative and powerful ones Cool; now show how women are pressured into marriage, while men are not. You can't. I’m confused — which is it that causes lower fertility, female knowledge or men being better fathers? You are the only one who made a claim of causation. I'm simply pointing out that it describes reality backwards. The factor keeping fertility rates low is not women happily staying single and childless cuz menz …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 09:46 PM
2

Yeah, social engineering built upon the idea of "Men Ain't Shit", what a novel approach, has never been tried before. We know across time and space that the better, "more appealing" men become as husbands and fathers, the less children women have. I'm afraid there may not be any spare time left to test brain-dead ideas. We know why women don't have babies. And it's not "men ain't shit". https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1n4vb8a/the_fertility_rate_is_inextricably_linked_to/
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 05:14 PM
2

I beleive after all this nonsense is over women will just outright become a matatriachly society. How are Womyn's Lands doing? no matter what form of diplomacy women bring out More gibs, more money, more free shit, all at the expense of men and women who love them, and for the benefit of women who don't. All these forms of diplomacy tried, what do men even want. the burden of moving civilization forward is entirely dependent on womens actions and choices Enjoy your smallpox-free existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:50 AM
2

do you think most men are raising children with other men or something? Do you think most children are raised by women alone? Compensate for less marriage and kids between straight people, obviously There are more never-married men than women. The share of single-parent households has peaked and is falling, Census.Gov has the numbers. "Female partnerships for raising kids" are not and have never been illegal, platonic or otherwhise. Worst-case scenario (depending on the country), the coparenting…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/25 07:34 AM
0

Less appealing to who, than what, and what is "female family sharing"? Compensate who? Men already work more, earn more, sleep less, and get more injuries, disabilities, and fatalities while supporting families than women working and giving birth, combined.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 07:30 PM
0

https://www.pew.org/en/research-and-analysis/articles/2019/07/08/modern-parenthood As of 2016, fathers' estimated contribution into child care in intact families was slightly above one-third of total child care. Meanwhile, same fathers did slightly less than two-thirds of paid labor. Both in 1965, and 2016, estimated total amount of work (paid and unpaid) was on average higher for men than for women; the gap in 2016 was higher than in 1965. Have my upvote for effort, but I'm afraid there is noth…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 04:57 PM
1

After taking a nap, I reconsider my take on this post. Please. For the love of flying spaghetti monster. Can you elaborate on the chain of reasoning from "I don't have social skills to deal with my in-laws", to "Men ain't shit"?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 12:56 PM
2

Out of school plus five years, whatever "school" attended last - no matter if it's high school, college, trade school, postgrad program, or whatever.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/25 09:22 AM
10

90+% of women would not pass medical screening for becoming a market-level surrogate. Alcohol/drugs within the last year (and Yes, weed counts)? 30+ years of age? Smoker? On anti-depressants? Fat? - Disqualified. Women already consoom more unearned wealth than ever in history, while giving birth to fewer children than ever in history. Half of married women (vs 8% of men) don't work full time. Quarter have zero income. I don't have any "alternative solutions", except absolute, rock-solid certaint…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 04:58 PM
5

I guess she feels that he was just hanging around her with the hopes of one day being with her. Can't blame them. Most women sort most men into "No" and "Maybe" boxes within a minute after meeting them. When women talk about "developing feelings [for a guy] over time", they mean like, three weeks. What if he develops feelings somewhere down the line, months or even years later, but just decides he needs to step away after being rejected? Since this never happens to (almost all) women, this must …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/25 04:49 PM
4

okay. I elaborated because I don't define a woman as "funny" "the wrong way"; just saying, in my relationship, I'm the funny one, and I love it this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:19 PM
3

has a woman ever won you over by being funny, By making me laugh, not so much. By laughing at my jokes, Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 05:01 PM
5

Name me any empire, any tyranny, any satrapy, where the enslaved, the subjugated, the second-class constituted 2/3 of tax collectors, 3/5 of highly educated, the majority of voters, and the minority of the disenfranchised. You can't. I meant more of "all of the above"; not every point separately. It may very well be that tax collection was entrusted to the "underclass", but brief Googling tells me that Jews were most often employed to collect taxes from other Jews, not from everyone (with except…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 08:18 AM
5

In what world is getting education a privilege and imply a position of power?? In every one if the Multiverse exists, except the upside-down land. Even not-so-educated rulers often invite highly-educated individuals as advisors. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_trust If equality of outcome is irrelevant, then women should FOREVER shut up about wage gap. Higher earning jobs are merit based, you don't even have to go there. Survival-level jobs are accessible to everyone. Is there anything that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/25 07:58 AM
27

Women are two-thirds of tax collectors, 3/5 of college graduates, ~52% of voters; one needs to actively and forcibly keep one's brain in a continuous state of switched-off to not notice that these things are positions of power and privilege. Name me any empire, any tyranny, any satrapy, where the enslaved, the subjugated, the second-class constituted 2/3 of tax collectors, 3/5 of highly educated, the majority of voters, and the minority of the disenfranchised. You can't. "In the medical system, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 11:13 PM

I’ve seen lots of other studies that suggest assortative mating is the norm even among higher income people. Previously in the OP: "high status individuals", "the world of real business, not drop shipping and crypto", "extremely accomplished", "graduating from top schools and earning real money", "with actual connections, skills, and competencies". My paper's sample: Two cohorts of intellectually talented 13-year-olds were identified in the 1970s (1972-1974 and 1976-1978) as being in the top 1% …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 07:28 PM
2

The businessman from a wealthy family who graduated from a top school is not going to go for a submissive and deferential woman with no career prospects or prominent background as his first choice. He is going to prioritize a woman with prospects, passions, and background. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268228333_Life_Paths_and_Accomplishments_of_Mathematically_Precocious_Males_and_Females_Four_Decades_Later Point of interest: Figure 2. The higher up in ability you go, the more pronoun…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/25 08:41 AM

Do you think you could go back to being blue pilled? YES. It would be stupid to latch onto a hypothesis that is unfalsifiable. Let me stylize my criteria as an AI slop response: 1. Majority of divorce initiators. Hottest, sootiest, smelliest smoking gun of The Red Pill is the fact that in every country we have data on, the better women are treated, a) the more they dump their husbands; b) the higher share of people dumping their spouses are women (both by paper trail, and self-reports). Since mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 06:51 PM
1

How many men do you think are settling for their girlfriends / wives? Very few relative to women, regardless of what threshold you set. It's like asking how many women are tall. Among themselves, roughly half (by definition). Relative to men, not many. When a woman settles and when a man "settles" are two entirely different scenarios. When women complain about men "settling", it's when those men's attraction to their wives/girlfriends is not absolute. When women settle, their attraction to their…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 04:43 PM
1

"improover" "Senpai, if you keep coaching like this, I'm gonna IMPROOooOOV!" Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 03:25 PM
0

It's 2025, it's totally fine not to be straight. Just stop messing with guys' hearts, some of the poor simps still think you're serious.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 08:28 AM
2

The question is why should women be interested? Because many of them insist on being categorized as straight. Straight, or heterosexual, means you are irrationally drawn towards having sex with a person of the opposite sex. If every time a woman sees a man, her mind process is "Initiating risk/cost/benefit analysis", rather than "WOULD", then women are not straight.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/25 07:27 AM
3

They are targeting women who fall under their definition of women as a whole. ALL women who fall out of TRP definition of women as a whole are either taken, or autistic lesbians.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/25 01:31 PM
1

senseless gun violence “school shootings” “domestic terrorism” style mass shootings assassinations ideological violence “The Joker” style maniacal violence a suburban kid from a Christian two parent well-to-do household to behave as if he’s an ironic Gotham villain All of these are different things, and you are jumping between them like a kangaroo on drugs, while accusing me of dishonesty. I’m acutely aware that inner city violence and other violence exists. But the motivations and reasons for w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 04:16 PM
1

I am saying why a person committing an act of ideological violence might be (taking your word for it) more conservative-leaning. Conservatives (largely) know how to shoot. Liberals (largely) don't. A liberal having an urge to commit ideological violence may throw a pebble at their target (because throwing a heavier stone requires exposure to toxic right-wing gym culture), and will either get slapped with misdemeanor, or institutionalized for insanity. Incompetence of liberals is not a virtue, no…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 03:28 PM
7

1) fewer college graduations Good; less debt. 2) less income than young female peers in big cities False. - "in 22 of 250 U.S. metropolitan areas, women under the age of 30 earn the same amount as or more than their male counterparts" - What do you think is happening in the remaining 228? 3) less employment False, table 1 - employment-to-population ratio between young men and women were exactly the same in April and higher in men up until and including July. Women are more likely to self-report …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/25 09:24 AM
0

Gun violence perpetrated by low socioeconomic males Now show me where I mentioned them or where they are mentioned in my source. You either accidentally responded to a wrong comment, or trolling.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 10:51 PM
0

That cultural linkage is leading to a pretty significant divide as related to male/female dating dynamics. Sweet. On the topic: conservative men might just be better shooters. It pays off when dad takes you on a shooting range instead of a... whatever the hell liberals subject their children to these days. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2017/06/22/the-demographics-of-gun-ownership/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 10:21 PM
1

Red pill is taking this rule ("ether have the appeal, or compensate for its absence") and bending it. You may not "have the appeal"; it's enough that you project it. You may not "compensate" for its absence; it's enough that you dangle the possibility that you may. Noob level: spend money on a woman. Mid level: let a woman know you have money. Pro level: make a woman guess wrong how much money you have. Is bending rules wrong? - You tell me; women have been doing it for the last century.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 10:08 PM
1

Probably yes; most papers I have seen on this topic land at gender-neutral result. Why the double standard then? - Because I don't date men, don't plan to date men, and mate copying behavior is less of a problem among men (although still a thing sometimes; there are some men that seduce married women basically for sport).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:54 PM
3

"Either be a natural Chad or make peace with being a beta" is blue pill logic; the vast majority of goodies women get for / by using their sex appeal has nothing to do with "sex work".
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:28 AM
3

That’s the options you have. No; that's what the blue pill tries to convince men their options are. It's harder to pull, to dangle the wealth in front of women and make them have sex without actually spending. Same as it's harder to monetize boobs without showing them. But any ridiculously attractive woman knows that she can get free stuff from men without actually touching or marrying them (or letting them see her naked).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:20 AM
4

A woman can use her boobs to get money in three ways. By rubbing them onto someone (a prostitute), by showing them (a stripper), or by just having them gracefully (an actress). Similarly, the highest utility of a man's wealth is when he gets sex because of it, without actually spending it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 08:07 AM
3

Agreed; both (bonding issues and cheating / unstable marriages) could be caused by genetics. Which would mean that women who want to sleep around are free to sleep around, because they'll crave it anyway, and men who want their future wife not to sleep around are still free and well-advised to stay away from these women.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:48 AM
2

So why one of the main complains is that you're expected to pay on the date? Answer: There is no "main complaint" that men are expected to pay on dates. It's just one of 10,000 pieces of evidence that women don't believe and have never believed in equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:37 AM
1

It's wild to me how redpillers use divorce data to justify this Divorce and cheating. Question, why does bonding with people damage your bonding abilities? This is not what I said, and even to the right question (why does rampantly UNbonding with people damage their bonding abilities) my answer is "the hell if I know, I'm a specialist in behavior of machines, not humans". You can look up other comments here, people have brought nice scientific recepits. "But they show high-N men are also..." - I…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:35 AM
4

Re-read the OP (or at least the title); I am just answering OP's question, not taking anyone on $500 date.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/25 07:16 AM
3

I would say this is most likely to happen among upper or upper-middle class, educated people in a western country In these cases, how does the couple not end up with a significant disparity in savings over time? Even assuming that the date is 3x better than "upper-limit average" and costs $500, a woman saves $250 relative to 50/50 split baseline. How many dates a year does she need to make a meaningful addition to her upper-middle class income?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:35 PM
7

Sex does not damage a woman's capacity to pair-bond. Sex does not damage a woman's capacity to pair-bond. A woman who married her high school sweetheart and then became a widow, has pair-bonding capacity in basically mint condition, even if both she and her late husband were ultra-high libido and enjoyed every second of it. What damages a woman's capacity to pair-bond are flings and breakups.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 05:58 PM

That’s why I think gender essentialism is dangerous TRP is not a political party offering to write "gender essentialism" into constitution. It's a simple self-evident fact of life: if you treat a woman exactly as you would a man in her stead, she will despise you for it. when you deny the role of socialization, you erase the possibility of change. Women are free to experiment with change at the expense of their own wages and savings. To this day, they have not produced any confirmed algorithm of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 05:40 PM
2

I would challenge you to consider all of the medical and emotional complexities of childbirth and how it affects women's bodies, many times, in ways that do not go as well as you might think. When I visited my SO in hospital after she gave birth, she looked like a victim of a botched reanimation. She recently said she wants to have another child. Kindly, Shoo.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:58 PM
3

Are we discussing my opinion, or the opinion of religious doctrine? If the latter, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_abortion If mine, I have no problem with any one specific case of abortion, including one done for convenience. I have a problem with one million.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:57 PM
3

They do. People who get injured, even after treatment, still suffer from long-lasting side effects. There is no time machine, no Department of Precrimes, and no cloning someone's personhood into a new body to fix their injuries. Accountability is not liberating victims from consequences of these events; it's investigating if these events happened because someone broke the rules, and punishing them accordingly. All of this is still completely irrelevant; OP's point is that abortions are perfectly…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:38 PM
1

I have. Pregnancy is not a disease; it's an unpleasant biological process. Termination of a human life, no matter how nascent, is not "cure". Most women know where babies come from, there are no medically confirmed cases of immaculate conception, ever. None of this is relevant to the fact that OP's analogy between a fetus and a felon breaking and entering into someone's house is false.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 12:00 PM
3

I am ready to provide free abortions myself to women who were so stupid that they reached adulthood, allowed a guy to cum inside them 30 times (on average), and then were like "Hey, why am I feeling like shit? Must be the flu."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 11:49 AM
3

The vast majority of terminated pregnancies have absolutely nothing to do with anyone breaking and entering into women's vaginas, and do not pose any abnormally high risk to a woman's life. Genesis lists two cases of god instructing humans to "be fruitful and reproduce" (one to Adam, one to Noah). "Risk to sanity" is too vague; people in the 80s considered metal music a threat to sanity of their children, but still could not (legally or biblically) shoot musicians on sight.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:53 AM
26

Women do just that tho... They just found that it’s a net negative to marry just any man There are consistently more never-married men than never-married women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 10:02 PM
0

The short answer to "Why doesn't the red pill try to fix the world?" is "Because trp is enjoying the decline of the world that is already irreversibly broken, not trying to fix it." Even though, if you are actually pilled, you know intuitively how that age gap dynamic is very likely to fail and that girl is very likely to end up older, baggage, and single (sound familiar?). ALL relationships are likely to fail; there is no magic formula that allows TRP to unconvince women of 100 years of feminis…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 07:01 AM
1

To what extent is the contention that men are falling behind in life accurate? To this extent. There is no more reliable measure of "falling behind in life" than losing it. Around year 2000, men were "falling behind in life" harder than during WW2 (relative to women; not in absolute numbers). Things somewhat stabilized since then, but not by a huge margin.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 05:16 PM
1

This is not what I said; I said "throw politicians in prison until the problem is solved". If you want to talk to yourself, do it in front of a mirror.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/25 02:47 PM
1

Girls: EWWW MaeLZ and their... stuff! Boys: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/rg36r5OplTw
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:10 PM
2

I'm gonna end this by asking this, why is this manosphere mindset so attractive to you ? It isn't. Other things that aren't attractive to me are ultimate fate of the Universe, second law of thermodynamics, existence of pathogens, and scarcity of resources. Which is not an excuse to believe that the world will be reborn in Ragnarok, to try to create machine of perpetual motion, to believe that diseases are caused by sin, or that abundance of food and good weather and caused by prayer. Truth is no…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:25 PM
3

TILL HOW LONG WILL U BRING BACK STUFF WHICH HAPPENED IN TNE PAST? For as long as people like you keep enabling them. No, "the past" was not worse for a woman in general than for a man in general. When women "couldn't get credit cards" (which is also a lie, but let's roll w it), men were sent to die in foreign jungle showered by friendly dose of carcinogenic defoliants. There was no point in history when men gathered together and said, "You know what, screw them bitches, let's benefit at their ex…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 10:10 PM

Bigotry is good and right, ackshully Okay!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 09:13 PM
3

Awesome; superimposed text: "This is what women actually believe". I appreciate if you put so much effort sarcastically in order to prove OP right. If men’s default wasn’t “subjugate and dominate people when they don’t do exactly what IIIIIII want” then there would be no issue to begin with. Let’s start there. Cool. Then there should be no issue to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:50 PM
2

No reason. If I was in their circumstances, I would also prefer to stay single. External circumstances, such as their demographic making up the majority of voters but the minority of net taxpayers, and internal circumstances, that if I get into, I'll get suspended.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 06:48 PM
1

So again I ask you, why would they, the women not in relationships the women that do want to be independant, work, no matter how hard it may be, not cut the middle man? Why would women not in relationships, not cut the middle man who is their relationship partner... ...because he is not there by given conditions? If you meant "Why would they not stay single", my only answer is "I don't know". What I do know is that there are more never-married men than women, by a solid margin.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 01:17 PM
1

Why didn't medieval lords just cut the middle man and toil their lands themselves? In the US, there are ~4 times more men dying at work supporting their families than women working and giving birth combined. Once you jump above median income, working is hard. Above ~2.5, it's exhausting. Employers are not idiots; they don't pay workers for being there and just existing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 11:22 AM
1

I agree in principle; women who wasted colleges' time and resources on training them should just be forced to get a normal job and earn themselves a normal retirement.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 12:41 AM
2

Men not living as long on average is irrelevant and was mentioned by no-one. You are talking to someone who is not here. Feminists protested against equal retirement age, not against earlier retirement for men (which is not a thing anywhere).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 09:45 PM
14

Do men believe that nice guys finish last ? Generally. Like you are gonna punish a woman who likes you because of your insecurity and past traumas ? And as we all know, only women are supposed to have insecurities and be affected by past traumas, because only women have souls. Being rejected is not "punishment"; you are not entitled to a relationship; "No." is a complete sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 04:22 PM
2

(suppressed chuckle) ... cuz... THE SQUOOZE ISN'T WORTH THE JIZZ!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:37 PM
2

There's a growing concern about the falling birthrates in the develped world and lots of subreddits, this one included, like to paint femenism and women liberation as the bad guy here. If feminism is irrelevant coffe-drinking self-help club, then it had nothing to do with women's vote. If feminism changed the constitution of the US twice before women were even able to vote, then it's a tangible political force. You can't have it both ways. For details on how feminism is linked to lower birth rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:22 PM
-2

This is a lot of far-reaching rhetoric that somehow still avoids the specific questions I asked. I wrote this all as direct responses to your questions or claims, then removed the questions themselves and points that ended up as duplicates for brevity. Example - your words vs mine : Leaving aside the extremely contradictory complaints about women being gold-diggers and beta-bucking and on welfare and wanting to remove all social safety nets, - Complaints are only contradictory if you don't think…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 11:05 PM
-1

Lots of questions, I'll try to condense. Complaints are only contradictory if you don't think. The demographic most reliant on state-provided safety nets are single and divorced women, mostly at the expense of married men. "Safety nets" is most often a code for "Women with no husband taking money away from other women's husbands (and therefore, from those women and their children as well, as their husbands don't earn just for themselves)". Women are worse at paying child support than men. There …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 10:46 PM
1

You probs responded to a wrong comment; not a single thing is relevant to what I was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 06:16 PM
-1

Threatening that you aren't going to marry isn't as scary as you think to women Who are you talking to? How do you know what they think? Why is this comment's point score keeps changing in a chainsaw pattern roughly every 6 hours?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 07:04 PM
2

Most men are not rapists, not abusers, not murderers, not gamblers, not alcoholics, not drug addicts, not cheaters, not unemployed, and not manbabies. Not everything is a problem only if/when it's the majority. There are enough women with the hots for bad boys for an average bad boy dick not to stay dry for longer than he wants to. And when a man's dick gets moisturized so often and enthusiastically, he gets ideas and decides that he must be doing something right. In short, look the Hell up what…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 02:42 PM
1

Atwood maintained that Gilead was extrapolation of existing trends. https://www.penguin.co.uk/discover/articles/margaret-atwood-handmaids-tale-testaments-real-life-inspiration Of course, in reality she took several artistic liberties. Communist Romania was ruled not by an absolute dictator, but by a couple, and its first lady remains the most decorated woman in human history. Prison labor in handling nuclear materials was used, but it was male. "Male infertility" was "glossed over", and yet the …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 10:04 AM
1

"The Handmaid's Tale" predates the red pill by 20 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/09/25 12:48 AM
1

There are 18.6 maternal death per 100k births. Per N births. As per your statistic there is 5041 workplace deaths per 163.1 million workers in the USA. Per 1 year. Do you give birth every year? I work every year. Within 26ish years of childbearing window, an average US woman gives 0.062 births per year.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 11:35 PM
1

Iliza Schlesinger Judging by the name and the topic, I expected to see a professor in Google results. I think I remember watching clips of her on Youtube, and I had a brief moment of joy that it's not a painfully mid chubby neurotic talking and laughing hysterically about her endometriosis or whatever. To the point, wether or not sexual selection is part/type of natural selection is the problem of classification, and classification is not science. She is free to see women as part of natural envi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 09:37 PM
14

https://nadja.co/2022/09/26/hundreds-protest-vote-to-raise-womens-retirement-age-in-switzerland/ "opponents to the plan say the reform is unfair to women as they face significant discrimination" - You can't make this stuff up; Switzerland has male compulsory military service.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 05:36 PM
10

we rarely see women this entitled to stranger mens money Look up feminist protests against equal retirement age.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 04:43 PM
0

Men are statistically less likely to die in their lifetime from a job related injury than a woman is die from childbirth in her lifetime like 10 fold. No. "There were 5,486 fatal work injuries recorded in the United States in 2022" "women made up 8.1 percent (445 [cases])" "In 2022, 817 women died of maternal causes in the United States" Women, maternal causes + fatal work injuries == 1262 Men, all fatal work injuries - women fatal work injuries == 5041 Almost exactly 4 dead men per dead woman. …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 04:07 PM
2

Women don't die from every childbirth.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:30 PM
1

You're 10x more likely to die from child birth than a workplace injury? You are more likely to die from one childbirth, than a workplace injury within a year. Women don't give birth every year. Men have shorter lifespans when they're single. For women, the effect is stronger.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 03:23 PM
2

Force[d] proximity In male adult kinky fantasy, it's "abduction/kidnapping". and power imbalance If workplace boss is too bossy, just quit. When authors write power imbalance for male audience, the dominant female is either unnaturally strong (genetically modified supersoldier, etc.), or has magical powers.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 01:56 PM
1

I don't know TRP sidebar by heart, let me know if it is. What I do know is that TRP theory advises men not to offer monogamy to women because it is not reciprocated.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 03:03 PM
1

Rollo is on TRP sidebar, Tate isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 10:21 AM
1

"Nine defendants were exonerated of sexual offenses; four in cases where the principal crime was sexual assault of an adult, and five where the principal crime was child sexual abuse." - The National Registry of Exonerations 2024 report.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/25 08:39 AM
3

"Many" is an imprecise quantifier. Estimated 2% of children in intact families are raised by oblivious non-fathers; even the lowest estimates are at around 0.6%. How "many" men maintain young harems on rotation? Inb4 "Well maybe not many-many, but many want to!" - Well maybe not many-many women cuck their husbands, but many want to.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:49 PM
7

OP's condition is not "marriage falling apart", but "you can exchange your wife/gf for a new younger one".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 03:20 PM
9

See my "Men are not slobs" posts. One: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1en4f2o/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_husbands_are_not/ and two: https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1ejrblm/short_version_men_are_not_slobs_fathers_are_not/ Men work more, sleep less, and die and develop disabilities from supporting their families at higher rates than women are from working and giving birth. https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/widget 1/4 prime-age women (25-54, versus only …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 02:36 PM
45

I can't magic an extra decade of lifespan to get used to a new person and learn each other's preferences and kinks. Out of 4 billion women on the planet, only one agreed to have my child. In my eyes this automatically puts her above everyone else, forever. The child hasn't grown up yet, and I don't want to drag them through custody battle. What supposed positive was I getting in this scenario, again? - Ah, "prettier", "young", "her body is not damaged by age/pregnancy" - all falling under the um…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 11:46 AM
1

If the poorer spouses is older than a certain age( lets say 50 years old) or have some kind of disability like autism( I have) they should receive alimony for life; Standard of living of the disabled should not be dependent on marital history. The compulsory alimony payments would be also a way to punish the abuser and compensate the victim and help to decrease this kind of crime Punishment for crimes and compensation for victims should not be be dependent on marital history, or decided outside …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 03:53 PM
2

Q4M: be honest.. do you use the same lines to get laid as you do to win over someone you actually want to date? YES, to my shameful shame. If I dig into my chat history, there's a message I sent my buddy years ago: "Can't hang out tomorrow, I'm about to get some benefits without commitment." "Without commitment" turned into 10+ years together and raising a child. I'm terrible at hookups.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:40 PM
5

The demographic that is going to benefit from artificial wombs are going to be women who struggle to conceive or keep the pregnancy and same sex couples.... artificial wombs wont raise the birthrates Does not follow. If infertile women and same-sex couples use AWs to have babies, this will raise the birthrates. And even when the children are there, fathers usually spend as little time as they possibly can with their kids. They avoid all responsibilities associated with their pregnant partners an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 02:00 PM
1

I'm feeling like we aren't even arguing opposing views here. Yes, men who think that pregnancy is like 20 push-ups are wrong; I personally know a woman who had to spend a month with her ass in a vice-like binder. Yes, women who think that pregnancy is automatic death sentence for sex life, are also wrong. Antinatalist feminist discourse is a thing; I used to follow radfem spaces out of morbid curiosity, and conspiracies around 'childbirth as male patriarchal weapon of dominance and subjugation' …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 01:47 PM

Theres no point being with a man if youre over 35 as a women Most women are probably oblivious to this, but it becomes very clear what guys like when they arent faced by societal judgement- hence studies and anonymous platforms like reddit Evidence level ESTABLISHED: REDDIT Google: site:reddit.com "AITA" "my husband" "YTA" "AITA for stopping my husband from traveling?" - This woman finds the point in stopping her man from traveling and threatening him with court. "AITA for asking my husband to j…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:34 PM
1

those of you who think we should make this more fair - or those who know what those people think - how do you propose we change this? Robotics. Not more icky than using punching bags and paper targets instead of someone's face or live animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 10:05 AM
3

Heterosexuality is constructed from a dominance-submissive script wherein women are socialized to be passive, submissive, and receptive of advances from their male partner. I'm pretty sure that a dominant, enthustiastic, assertive woman having sex with her boyfriend still counts as heterosexual. Correct me if I'm wrong. Guys, is it gay if she's on top? Still. Upvote for a chuckle.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 09:29 AM
3

It doesn’t make pregnancy the fucking trivial cakewalk you guys like to pretend it is You "have no interest in wasting your time", yet you produced four paragraphs arguing with imaginary opponent. On behalf of men, sorry that as men provided you with everything that makes your lifestyle possible, artificial wombs haven't made the list 100 years ago. Were too busy preventing cholera in babies. No, wait, not sorry; this is normal and healthy set and sequence of priorities. We will get there. Come …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 08:28 AM
-4

Like women centuries and millennia ago watching their sisters and mothers and cousins bleed to death And then men noticed that "midwife magick" is actually bullshit, and developed obstetrics. Like, the idea that feminism is why women fear childbirth and pregnancy is honestly one of the stupidest things I’ve heard in a while. Try reading feminists. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2006.14.9.21799
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:49 AM
4

old people were still taken care of Yes. https://np.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/tzkgqq/life_expectancy_in_the_us_1900_2021_oc/ I’m sorry, did you even read Picketty!? No; I meant another person by "their prophet". “Endless [rapid] growth” is absolutely a hangover from the Industrial Revolution that we, as a species, are going to have to move past. I am aware of zero countries where 'endless growth' is written in constitution as official state policy on economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 12:00 AM
5

I know the common rebuttal, fewer births means fewer taxpayers, which supposedly puts strain on social services and causes societal issues. But that “problem” exists only because our entire economic system is built on the assumption of endless growth. If you have 1 worker per 10 non-work-capable old farts, either this worker feeds them, or they die. If he does, he has no time and strength to feed his family. So, tomorrow you have 1 worker per 100 non-work-capable old farts. "Our entire economic …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 10:24 PM
1

I brought up tattoos because anger issues and stabbings are ACTUAL red flags "Stop calling tattoos a red flag! I am not obsessed with defending tattoos and insisting they are not a red flag!" You’re sounding actual crazy right now Right back at you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 02:44 PM
1

a very weird agenda against this one specific thing "If women can't tell that anger issues, tattoos, stabbing/gunshot scars, etc. are red flags," These are more than "one specific thing". But you are totally not obsessed with this one specific thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 02:04 PM
1

"Litmus test I really like on this sub is how enthusiastically women defend tattoos on a potential partner, despite it being bloody obvious that impulsive, high time preference individuals are more likely to subject their bodies to irreversible painful augmentations with lasting side effects." Thank you for proving my point!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 01:51 PM
1

but the problem is there are always women with extremely low self esteem, high "pick me" energy and an insatiable/desperate need for male approval who are willing to entertain and try to please these males. Hot take, but Not really. "Low self-esteem" for women is very often (not always, but VERY often) aesthetic choice, not an actually held belief/position. Wear minimal makeup, baggy clothes, simple hairstyles, minimalist accessories, etc., but once a truly average guy shows interest in her, she…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 01:45 PM
1

Close to three in 10 Gen Z women, 28.5%, identify as LGBTQ+... So, gen z women are queer at rates more than 2.5 times that of gen z men. Most women "identifying as blablabla" still date men. Women love to point out that "lesbians with history of intimate partner abuse" actually often report that the abusive ex was a man. and never going to give an equitable amount of domestic work Men work more than women. Men who are husbands work even more, and more than their partners. Men who are fathers as …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 12:05 PM
1

Dating landscape sucks, I am not single. Um, checkmate, atheists?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 11:45 AM
1

If women date, sleep with, get knocked up by, and marry men they aren't attracted to, and don't do any of these with men they are attracted to, then feminism is pointless. If women can't tell that anger issues, tattoos, stabbing/gunshot scars, etc. are red flags, then feminism is wrong. Litmus test I really like on this sub is how enthusiastically women defend tattoos on a potential partner, despite it being bloody obvious that impulsive, high time preference individuals are more likely to subje…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 09:36 AM
2

You bring up bad behavior specifically because I don't want psychopathy genes to dominate the future to the point that my great-grandchildren will have nobody to befriend except each other. Women are free to have sex with bad men if the tingles are so overwhelming, but is it really so much to ask to use a condom. "Uuuh why don't you tell this to men" - Because by given conditions, they are bad men, and they don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 03:16 PM
2

you don’t care that 99% of convicted rapists are men I care how skewed the justice system and the law itself against the male sex are, I don't care that you brandish it as proof of men's moral failure. By all means, enjoy your smallpox-free existence, and stop trying to justify your disdain for male plebs, you really don't have to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 11:31 PM
2

99% of people who commit actual rape are men This is not what you said one comment ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 09:59 PM
2

ah yes, comfort women are women’s sick BDSM fantasy. Feminist interpretation of comfort women is women's sick BDSM fantasy. 99% of convicted rapists are men I don't care. but women bad for having fantasies LMFAOO Have all the fantasies, don't call them history.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 08:24 PM
4

Not a single conscript in human history got "sedated by promise of power over women"; he was threatened by prison labor and forcible needle-stamp-tattooing if he tries to dodge the draft. Conscription got instituted in late 18th century; recruitment in previous years/centuries worked in slightly other ways, but the main motivation to join the armed forces was the chance of ennoblement and the right to pass the title to your descendants. I never responded to a claim "wartime rape existed". it sti…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 08:03 PM
9

The rulers would often force men into drafts and conscription; sedating them by promising them that when they get to where they’re going they can take all the women and gold they want. Again, promising them power over women in exchange for doing their bidding. This is the majority of human history. Ruling men and abiding men did all of this without being provoked by “misandry” or feminism. It wasn’t until the early 20th century and that first wave feminism pushed the idea that men treating women…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/25 12:46 PM
15

We also know that men's romantic/mate procurement drive goes down in monogamy as well. I don't, because I don't see "less flowers, more mortgage" as "less effort".
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:25 PM
15

This is nice but unfalsifiable. We can as well pretend that people who get sick just don't pray sincerely enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:14 PM
1

A man locked in a dead bedroom with unmotivated wife is worse off than a woman whose husband (who is still loyal, sexually active attentive lover) occasionally watches adult entertainment with someone younger. Even if said unmotivated wife still considers him hot ay eff. But yes, philosophically, thermometer reading (sexual motivation) and ambient temperature (sexual attraction) are two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 09:03 PM
8

The 2002 paper is limited to college students. Same effect. The 60yo sample is listed by the paper itself as least reliable, so you can ignore it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:21 PM
15

At 30? Or even among college students (in 2002 paper)? The decline slope vs relationship duration is almost the same for 30yos and 45yos.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:20 PM
9

I don't believe what they say about wanting to be tender is false; I believeD the question is vague, now I'm certain that it's even more so: From the paper: the wording of the survey (listed in table 4) is "I just want to be tender — more than or same as my partner". I'd say it's well established that men are "less cuddly" in general; this is one of the things that tells us absolutely nothing.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 08:10 PM
5

The study operates on time scale of years, not minutes/hours; I also never felt like "Omg what have I done" after busting a nut.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:58 PM
9

Assuming "Living apart means meetups are predetermined" doesn't explain why women are quite motivated to have sex at the beginning of a relationship even when living together. Women who don't live together with partner, still experience reduction in sexual motivation, just not as steep. Add to that Killewald's finding that men experience increase in divorce risk after losing full-time employment, irrespective of its impact on household income (what changed? - Hubby started spending more time at …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:55 PM
11

No; it really just proves that in women, familiarity breeds contempt, and more familiarity breeds more contempt.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:39 PM
2

Only under assumption "Men are horny animals that will gladly hate-fuck anything with a pulse". Otherwise, they're quite causally linked.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:33 PM
14

You can ignore any differences between men and women in this paper, and just concentrate on how women's sexual motivation changes relative to their own former selves. Can its steep fall be slowed down? - Yes! The paper discovered two very handy factors to achieve exactly this, and neither has anything to do with doing dishes, massage, or romantic dating. The factors are, living separately, and man is more educated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:24 PM
9

I believe it depends what we define as "monogamy". Technically these women might not be having sex with anyone else.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:05 PM
6

So what you're saying it's not exclusive to women. Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:02 PM
19

I am not wasting time on debating the claim "sexual attraction is not sexual attraction". It is, by the first law of propositional logic, the law of identity.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 07:01 PM
18

This is not a conclusion we can meaningfully make from this paper, because it didn't interview participants for their cheating history, and even if it did, reports on cheating history made at home, often in presence of a spouse, would not be reliable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 06:55 PM
1

I believe the key phrase is "women are worse" (bracing for impact)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:21 PM
3

Talking about good things that men can do but women can't is a punishable offense on Reddit, and apparently comments like this are auto-searched by bots now (judging by swiftness of countermeasures).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 04:16 PM

Did your previous girlfriends, or your current ones offer gifts? Yes, and I refuse, usually in advance not to hurt anyone's feelings. Things I actually want - such as my assets to increase in value - cannot be given as a gift. Very few things that I want that can also be given to me as a gift - such as enough money to cover the remainder of mortgage - are too expensive. So, I thank anyone in advance if they don't clog my place with useless nonsense that will end up in a trash bin within a month.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 03:13 PM

extreme patriarchies Value judgement. I've heard women say with a straight face that current-day US and UK are "extreme patriarchies". in those past patriarchal societies Which ones? De Beauvoir's "The Second Sex" describes an entire small town whose only produce was brothel services. Around ~1800, 0.5% of entire population of Paris were prostitutes. If that were true we'd expect to see an increase in non-reproducing men not a decrease. There is an increase in non-reproducing men, although to my…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 01:43 PM
7

Reddit's terms of service only allow to talk about women's unique values; last time I brought up an argument about how not well women are built for wage labor compared to men, I got a suspension; so, sorry not sorry, this is the limit of my input.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 02:43 AM
8

Women do not make children for men. It is a criminal offense to impregnate a woman without her consent, even if it's one's wife. It is a criminal offense to spike her food or drink with contraceptives, even if it's one's wife. It is NOT illegal for a woman to get pregnant by a man of her choice, even if she is married to someone else. Children is not the value that women bring into their relationship with men; it's a decision they make out of their own free will and choice. Children cannot be a …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 12:47 AM
1

It's a thingy that keeps the hubby busy and satisfied when the wifey isn't in the mood (which is basically almost always), that also does the dishes/laundry and can take the kids to and from school.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 11:10 PM
1

No, because I'm assuming you mean two things: 1) I can get only one synthetic; 2) if I choose a synthetic, I am obliged to leave my human partner. These two things defeat the whole purpose. I have predicted multiple times right here on PPD that if synthetics as you describe them appear on the market, their primary consumers will be married couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 09:26 PM
2

Men: how do you feel about traditional gender norms? The same way I feel about condoms. Uncomfy, but the best effect for its price, and overdesigned to near-perfection. Except condoms are needed to prevent things from happening; gender norms are needed to prevent scarcity. Early societies that stuck to what we call "traditional gender norms" had abundance of crops for trade, better navigation, sturdier houses, sharper speartips, and stronger warriors. Societies that didn't, had scarcity of some …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 08:48 PM
1

Note: I'm not saying all women would make good mothers, but I am saying, anecdotally, I observe far more good mothers than I do good fathers. You recognize that this part is your anecdotal observation; I believe the rest is so obviously true that there's nothing to debate. Yes. Yes, most people would not make good parents. We can only hope that there's correlation between "good with children" and "wants children", and that contraceptive usage will slowly flush "bad parent genes" into non-existen…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:48 PM
2

There are more never-married adult men than never-married adult women; the gap is increasing. Serious part ends here. Has the Purge been announced, but flairs don't work? Women grow up with a romantic view of a happy marriage and kids. Yeah, every time I wanted to watch something romantic with male protag, like Disney's Alladdin, my parents gave me Conan VHS instead, because I was a boy. "...And hear the lamentations of their women."
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:27 PM

"You shouldn't depend on sports, therefore, you should dedicate your 20s to the most batshit insane drug-fueled orgy parties available in your area instead, and switch to healthy lifestyle and gym at 30" does not actually work for me as logical, but you do you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 07:06 PM

your sex is the majority of voters All I can say is "Whatevs"; I have no opinion here because I have never cheated on anyone and not planning to.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:40 PM
1

You can claim it’s women’s job to do this or that. It's adult human's job to wipe their own ass and keep their own place of residence in order. Men expect that from women Men expect nothing from women, and if women operate solely on other people's expectations, they don't have agency - I don't believe so because I am not a misogynist. Mentally healthy adults negotiate division of labor in relationships; men do what they must, women do what they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:39 PM
1

more household chores You spend more time at home, you make most of the mess, you do most of the cleaning. HALF of married women do not work full time. and child care duty Women make 100% of reproductive decisions, within or out of wedlock. Coercing a woman to have or not to have children is a crime, even if she's one's wife. Having a child with a man other than husband is not a crime. Women do not have children for men or at men's request or out of obligation to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 06:17 PM
1

I’d argue the stats for younger generations have the man as the sole provider at much lower rates as the percentage of egalitarian households and households with a woman as the primary earner has been steadily rising over the years, why would it stop. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/18q2oiu/antimemoryhole_image_hosting_in_year_2022_men_are/ Wage gap has stagnated in early 1990s. Women are more likely to be family providers in older couples. But he’ll stay anyway because he “values” …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:57 PM

https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1mvkbjy/sperm_competition_and_female_procurement_of_male/ Men are so not attracted to their aging wives that 60+% of men in their 60s still report wanting sex often after 36 years in relationship with the same person... versus 20% of women. Most of whom by statistical necessity are married/partnered to average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:43 PM

https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1mvkbjy/sperm_competition_and_female_procurement_of_male/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:52 PM

Which ones? Most men are more attracted to their aging wives than most women are to average men. This? - Don't have any. Same as women arguing that men "aren't attracted to their aging wives" have never produced any proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:35 PM

If a woman is attracted to her partner initially, she will be as he ages. The first part is a huge If, the second is not a given.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 04:33 PM

It's not a slip. When a woman accidentally admits that she considers her partner average, it's usually a slip. I realistically simp hard I don't care; you are one anonymous person arguing on the Internet. I have zero means to fact-check your personal anecdotes, but even if all of them are 100% true, I still expect you to be a real person, not an LLM bot, and thus, to exist in reality. In reality, ~50% of marriages fail by 20 years, and 68% of divorces are desired by women - desired, not just fil…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:58 PM

I'm attracted to my aging partner despite him having exactly zero tentacles. Good for you both. Why do I need to be attracted to anyone but my partner? You don't "need" to be attracted to anyone. Why do women need to be attracted to the average man? They don't "need" to be attracted to anyone. Would any woman describe her partner as an average man? Yes, and I appreciate the honesty every time something like this slips. Would a man want that? No. This is the problem. Simps and their delusions are…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 03:15 PM

It's "peek", not "peak"; now go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 02:55 PM

And men want women to be attracted to men, not to tiny subset of best approximations of women's sick bdsm fantasies. You can't have everything. Most men are more attracted to their aging wives than most women are to average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 01:34 PM

If you want to "lock someone down", vote to make divorces illegal; your sex is the majority of voters. If instead you want to be an adult and build a relationship with someone, it is progressively harder with every passing year, but also the slope is steeper for women (even if they "land" at a higher level in the end, thanks to online dating and vast pool of divorcees).
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 01:20 PM

If women "hit a wall" then why should we bother with marriage? Exactly because this. You are asking why should anyone bother with window of opportunity if it's limited. Why do sports if you get weaker at older ages anyway? - Um, because older ages suck less if you do sports in advance. still ascribes to the idea that a woman's value is tied to her youth and perceived fertility... If you luck out and find an honourable man, then great. More power to you. But to me that is more the exception than …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 01:06 PM

Have you been to therapy before? How did it go? Yes; it was fine but too expensive; I came once to have a professional's opinion on three very specific questions that I had, I got my answers, accepted them for consideration, and went on to live my life. I’m not going to tell you it’s freakish to rant over 80/20, n counts, western women, the true nature of women, and all of that, but it is odd because I’m kind of a nutcase, and still feel like most of you are probably not sane. So... you are not …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/25 04:04 PM
1

I have a Parker O-Ring Handbook opened in the next tab. Every line, every picture, every table, every footnote is more interesting than this question. They just aren't. Just like I am just not sexually attracted to, I don't know, cinderblocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/25 02:28 PM
2

Why do men assume gorgeous women will have a bad personality ? Why judge a woman unfairly and harsh ? Why are loaded questions and rant posts allowed now? They don't; read literally anything on halo effect.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 08:27 AM
4

It's not something that can be measured. Solved; op's conjecture "Women rarely settle as much as men" is an ass-pull.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/25 12:45 AM
7

"Wives have consistently reported lower marital satisfaction than husbands since the earliest available data from the 1970s." Among those who stay married, women report lower marital satisfaction.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 09:13 PM
24

Women rarely settle as much as men Wives have predominated (USA) in wanting divorce since the earliest available data on who wanted divorce from the 1940s. Wives have consistently reported lower marital satisfaction than husbands since the earliest available data from the 1970s. Women have been the majority of divorce plaintiffs by paper trail since at least 1867.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/25 05:41 PM

One of my kids is into horror 2-d/3–d. Liam Vickers for the win! We have a set of Murder Drones plushies for the little one. Find the Ozempic one. "I'm finally healthy!" Oh my god. Yes. Yes. Thank you. I needed just a dose of this today. Or two.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 04:09 PM

Hey, thanks! Haven't heard of them before.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 02:26 PM
3

What traditional roles or habits from the opposite gender (or any) do you just fully accept without trying to rationalize anymore Women naturally possess higher long-term stress tolerance, better short-term memory, better sensation of taste and smell, better body balance, better muscle & joint flexibility, slower metabolism and consequently lower consumption of nutrients, proteins, micro-elements, and vitamins with exception of calcium; these things naturally dictate their gravitation towards ce…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 12:00 PM

I hate that JoJo Siwa is polluting my JJBA search results. That is all. Everything else, my SO knows of.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 09:49 AM
8

Do You Think Women Are Lying About Their Safety Concerns? Yes. I just want to know if enough of you actually believe this is the case and if so why? Even if we assume that "Chad" doesn't exist, just look how aggressively women inject themselves into traditionally male spaces. This is not what you do with the demographic that you're afraid of. If I have a safety concern about ... I dunno, people with a certain haircut, I will not make it illegal for them to work among themselves away from me.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 07:37 PM
1

what’s wrong with my comparison? are they not equally as SELFISH? because that’s what i actually said... either that or you gained it through luck or inheritance, which would mean you are loved for the same reason a woman is loved: something you inherited from your parents and luck (of good genes) No, they are not equally selfish. There is no such thing as equitable division of boobs in divorce, boob support, or boobimony. Depriving one's wife of access to money is considered financial abuse; de…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 10:26 PM
0

if it’s not a thing then what was the point of saying it, i feel like you were trying to make a comparison but i don’t see what you’re making a comparison to. You made a comparison, and it was terrible: "it’s equally as selfish for a woman to “love” a man because he is rich as it is for a man to “love” a woman because she has big tits." Tits are part of you. Money is not. The vast majority of men in love with women usually also like what those women do with those tits, not just their shape or si…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 09:46 PM
0

It's not a thing. You can't enjoy someone's body without dealing with their personhood. Souls have never been demonstrated; your body is the only part of you that is proven to exist, and that other people can meaningfully observe, comprehend, and interact with. Loving a woman "for her body" is very much loving her for her. Yes, a horrible accident might ruin someone's facial symmetry. Guess what, a stroke or a really nasty flu can ruin someone's sense of humor. Bank account, on the other hand, c…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 09:11 PM
0

Not "completely", but men don't date women with intent of taking their bodies away.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:57 PM
1

What's up with I want the same treatment as Chad? "Who?... WHO?... WHO ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?! Not every man is your ex boyfriend!" (c) Shoe0nHead
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:37 PM
-5

Men don't date women with intent of taking their bodies away. Men date women with intent of making these bodies feel good.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/25 08:32 PM
2

some TRPers The posts I linked are taken from "Top", under condition that they are at least 7 years old. All are at least 1,600 points and at least 82% upvoted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:29 PM
5

Relace "np" at the beginning of URL with "old". TRP is quarantined, not banned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:29 PM
3

It was a tool to help you become a better man, not to sit in self-loathe and self-pity but to realize that nobody is coming to save you. That your life is your own. I watched men on the path to divorce win back their marriage and families because of the RedPill, in real time, I seriously miss those days, I will never understand why Reddit banned it. Now it's been turned into anti-feminism, hatred, selfishness, etc Only the people who were there on the RedPill sub 2013-2019 can tell you, this isn…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:07 PM
1

how do you talk to women about these things? Women tell everything themselves, I often have nothing to add. I knew an aged woman (her grandson was 10 at that point) who used to work in navy communications in her youth; she got a service call from a submarine crew member, and (after they were done with job/service topics) he said he really liked her voice, and asked her out on a date. They met, he brought flowers, she laughed in his face, and refused any romantic advances beyond buying her dinner…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 12:55 AM
0

If you were an average woman, If I magically swapped minds with my alternate-universe female self, I would absolutely be better than women at vetting guys, because I know superficial nonsense like arm shape and chin protrusion have zero impact on how well a guy can do oral. If I was reborn as an average woman with my memory erased, I would be just as bad as an average woman. Do you really think that women have some defect that just manifests like this? Both men and women have specific maladaptat…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 05:29 PM
1

"Not smoking is stupid because there's still chance to develop lung cancer" If you want additional lesson on risk management, we can discuss additional price.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 04:52 PM

Women got the power to redistribute their specific risks on male bank clients around the same time as when men were drafted into overseas war. There was never a federal law in the US saying that women can't have bank accounts. There was and is a federal law in the US saying the government can send men to war against their will. It's in your heads.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 04:50 PM
1

If pangolins aren't purple inside, why don't they fuck upside-down? Checkmate, atheists! If you want probability theory lesson from me, we can discuss the price.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 04:43 PM
1

Thats a lie because the complaint is that women dont go for them and thats why they end up hurt. No-one ever said that introverted nerds CANNOT be assholes. You are confusing absolute statements with probabilistic ones. Introverted nerds are significantly less likely to be assholes than tattooed convicts.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:02 PM
2

Introverted nerds can also be assholes, regardless of looks. No-one ever claimed the opposite. STILL not an excuse to get knocked up by a tattooed convict.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 11:10 PM
0

and if they didnt, they still had to almost always be financially controlled by their fathers You have not provided any evidence in support of this claim. Op-eds by deranged feminists don't count. I read NC last time in its entirety when I was researching de Beauvoir's "The second sex" reference that it "holds out the promise of jury's leniency to husband who punished his unfaithful wife"; so I went in looking how exactly could civil code hold out a promise of jury's behavior to a man accused of…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 10:24 PM
-1

no idea what point your even trying to make Napoleonic era was shit for everyone; if women didn't like conditions of marriage, they could refuse to marry ("There can be no marriage where consent is wanting" - article 146). Men could not refuse conscription on the basis of lack of consent. twin you told me not to swear thats why i fuckin swore No; I told you to wash your mouth.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:41 PM
6

Women are choosing to be single. "among those ages 25 to 64, men outnumber women by a large margin among never-married adults (125 men for every 100 women), but men are outnumbered by women among previously married adults (71 men for every 100 women)." Pew Research Center. You are grossly underestimating women's unwillingness to earn for themselves. Women aren't into men and that's a good thing Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:28 PM

"If pangolins aren't purple inside, why don't they fuck upside-down? Checkmate, atheists!" - "Excuse me... could you elaborate?" - "That doesn't answer my question." Okay.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:26 PM
0

i admit i was wrong fuck no and fuck you. well_that_escalated_quickly.png whereas men didnt need the permission of anyone ONLY women who were public traders being allowed financial autonomy is still awful https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lev%C3%A9e_en_masse#/media/File:Louis-L%C3%A9opold_Boilly_-_Departure_of_the_Conscripts_in_1807_-_WGA02349.jpg - Men under Napoleon, artist's rendition.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:20 PM

"If the husband refuse to authorize his wife to plead in her own name, the judge may give her authority." Chapter VI, article 218. "The wife, if she is a public trader, may, without the authority of her husband, bind herself for that which concerns her trade; and in the said case she binds also her husband, if there be a community between them. She is not reputed a public trader, if she merely retail goods in tier husband's trade, but only when she carries on a separate business." article 220. "…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:38 AM
9

Are there stats about how women could actually "stop whining and do shit themselves" before feminism ? Yes. The premise is essentially that in "the good old days", women had nothing to complain about An oversimplification (life was shit for everyone before eradication of smallpox; estimated 400 million dead in 20th century alone, mostly children), but way closer to truth than "women could never do anything ever 6000 years of rape and domestic slavery blahblah" I wanna know about women back then …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 08:15 AM
5

So the question is, where are all these men in the wake of "Are We Dating The Same Guy" and the Tea app? Tea App is available for iOS and Android; the only threat to its existence is a dozen women suing the app's creators for data breach. What do you expect us to do in defense of speech that is not being suppressed?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 11:10 PM

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 09:29 PM

read some Marx Engels for the win.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 09:10 PM

Is finding love possible for an average guy? My personal estimate: yes, after twenty-seven years of searching, a failed marriage, and getting cheated on twice.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 09:09 PM
1

Hey man some of us are still waiting on sources for your claim beyond "I did some math and drew some conclusions". I was on a business trip at a production site where I deliberately ordered to limit internet access to improve cybersecurity. Spent the night there, because we got shipped some new and improved chips that turned out to be only nominally backwards-compatible, so I had to dig through reserves to find the proper ones and solder them myself, because it would be faster and less headache …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 08:55 PM
-3

I am happy for you both; just saying, it's not an argument, it's a "Shup-Up" conversation-terminator; while you might be one of these (few) women, you're still living in the real world. Imagine how unproductive a discussion about sexual violence against women would be if 300 men jumped in and said "Okay, but hear me out, I'm a man and I have never raped anyone!" - ...okay, do you... want a star-shaped lollipop, or what?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:49 PM
-17

Extrapolating from non-paternity events and assuming contraception use, an average married mother of two commits 120 acts of infidelity during her reproductive window. Estimated 2% of children are non-paternity events that fathers don't suspect of. Average child requires ~30 unprotected intercourses per conception. Even the worst contraceptives have only 1% chance of failure. Two children, times 2%/100 chance of NPA, times 30 intercourses per conception, times 100 intercourses per contraceptive …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 12:34 PM

Yes. Also, the majority of men are not rapists. However, enough men are rapists for women to complain about it being a problem. Enough married mothers are NOT employed full time for me to call out the baseless man-hatred and deliberate potraying of men as careless, disinterested non-participants in their childrens' lives. I say it as a person who finished teaching his child to ride a bicycle 4 days ago. The child's mom took part in the process a grand total of zero times. I don't hold it against…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 06:48 AM
1

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/data/widget As of right friggin now, 1/4 prime-age women (25-54, versus only 1 in 7 men) are not employed (not "unemployed" tho, because these are two different things for reasons). Google the definition of "workforce". 23% of married women contribute a total zero to household income; 55% rely on their husbands as primary or sole providers; only 52% of married mothers (vs 92% fathers) are employed full time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 09:57 PM
1

i still don’t understand what women dumping men during covid has to do with you waiting For the third time: the time I am willing to wait for sex is longer than an ordinary woman's. No matter if at the beginning of dating, or in an established relationship. If all men you know are fuckboys expecting anal on the third date, it's a good moment for introspection.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 07:23 PM
1

most people probably can’t even remember their childhood friend or former classmates names "Nearly six in 10 young adults live within 10 miles of where they grew up" - Census. It's hard to forget the names of people you constantly meet in grocery store. i don’t see how your covid example is a counter argument, what does that have to do with the friend zone. The question was "so how long would you be willing to wait to have sex with a woman?" The rates and eagerness of women dumping men during CO…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 06:33 PM
2

7 months Exactly. I, too, don't know any women dating or marrying their childhood friends, or former classmates, or staying loyal to men if they get separated for logistical reasons (such as COVID restrictions). And your best counter-example is also shorter than a healthy pregnancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:51 PM
1

Longer than an average woman is willing to ponder dating me before stuffing me in a friendzone No-box forever, especially earler in life, before I learned about this box's existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 05:29 PM
1

So... Tea App proves NOTHING. Thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:20 PM
20

“Girls demand commitment from ugly guys but fine giving hot guys casual sex” has the similar issue. The complainers just want casual sex, not consistency. False; I don't want casual sex, too afraid of HIV. For the same reason I don't want a partner who used to have lots of casual sex with men who also had lots of casual sex. Dzeb00nkedz.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:19 PM
1

This part also didn't demonstrate how Tea App proves anything. If its mere existence is a proof of something, then women could have made one themselves, 15 years ago, with better cyber-security. The fact that they didn't proves a lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:16 PM
1

Nothing of what you said demonstrated how Tea App proves anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:11 PM
1

Their husbands work two jobs. Half of married women with children don't work full time.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 11:28 AM
2

They don't, "90% of OF subs are married men" is a myth; solved.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 09:05 PM
-1

"When seven years were passed and the time had come to take the child from the women, Rohalt put Tristan under a good master, the Squire Gorvenal, and Gorvenal taught him in a few years the arts that go with barony." The Romance of Tristan & Iseult Drawn from the best French Sources and Retold by J. Bédier Rendered into English by H. Belloc. Joseph Bédier was a medievalist historian, by the way. For the most of human history, women only looked after children who were either very young, or female…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/25 05:29 AM
3

Why is it held over our heads and used as a threat? Women got threatened by men developing substitutes for them long before men started pointing it out. Let's not project so hard and confuse cause and effect so deliberately. If they can make a female bot why wouldnt they make the same thing for their female costumers? Don't know, don't care. Personally I think it would be great to have relations with something that customized to look the way you want or is attractive in general and is programmed…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 02:39 PM

All of them, my SO is my most dedicated fan.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 03:00 PM
1

Male thirst is men's greatest enemy A joke is somewhere there to be made, about Israel being men's greatest ally. (I am going straight to Hell)
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:33 PM
0

I recently made a post about OF and how it basically confirms men are sharing top tier attractive women and how that's hypergamy. Men were malding as expected, You said a stupid thing, OF is not a dating site. Buying factory-made bread is not "romantically sharing the same attractive baker." People who date OF models don't pay to see their boobs. Men were malding as expected, but the most common response was that dating up in attractiveness "is not hypergamy." The most common response was that b…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:17 PM
2

Men are fundamentally unsuitable for long term relationships A half-truth. More generally, men are incompatible and non-complementary with women. Women insisted on inserting themselves in every male space; women should leave men alone. C. Most men are not contribute equally to the household. Yes; most men contribute more, both when married, and when parents, in most years we have recorded evidence for, including years 1965 and 2015. Men only "not contribute to the household" if you pretend that …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 11:25 AM
2

Proceeds to dox these women. The app's developer who doxed the women by putting zero effort into cyber-security was indeed a man; it's almost like there are natural observable gender differences in ability to code. Man made a bad app that women used anyway. Women did not make a better app. Update: men's faces also were leaked; men ranked by women as "least red-flaggy" all look the same. Understanding perfectly that the guy in the video is a red flag. We've been through this; the guy in the video…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 11:15 AM
8

If you define "good" as "perfect", then Yes, they are just not there. Almost all single men (past certain age) are traumatized in some way by previous relationships, exhausted by burdens of life, were made fun of and mocked for seeking help at the moment of weakness, had to get actual employable professional training instead of spending years learning how to be perfect gentlemen with PhD-level knowledge of female anatomy and psychology, and/or invested most of their money into savings and few ho…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 05:16 PM
0

Dude, look at the military now and you can plainly see women doing the same jobs as men. ...First, it's "Sergeant-Sir"; second, your level of competence in this question is made clear, thanks for your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:55 PM
2

I was not asking when; you already answered that, and your previous answer was different (during WW1 and WW2, which is before invention of hormonal contraceptives). I was asking how. Were women during WWs producing as many tanks as men, per person? Because last time I checked, the answer was No; most factories during wars were still employing men, because even a man unfit for or injured in combat was a valuable worker. To my knowledge, reliable data on women's work ethic and productivity during …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 01:44 PM
0

"Western Europe, started the nhs, better education for the masses etc after the Second World War. During this war, they also recognised the importance of women, not only did women keep the economy working while most if the men worked in WW1, but women started contributing more and fighting in WW2 as well. It became clear then when women weren’t held back by laws, they were just as capable as men." If instead of having careers women were (and are) having babies, then to who, and how, and in what …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 12:12 PM
1

childcare is predominantly still dumped on women Passive voice == "I have no argument". No-one decided for women to dump their loving husbands and/or have children out of wedlock; if anything, society actively discourages them from these choices. Men have higher total workload than women in intact families with children. You know this, because I made two posts on this topic and you commented under both of them. By some estimates, these men's unpaid labor workload is more than third of total (whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 11:32 AM
1

It became clear then when women weren’t held back by laws, they were just as capable as men. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/personal-incomes-statistics-for-the-tax-year-2022-to-2023 Table 3.12: Income and tax for individuals of pension age (note 1), by sex, region and country, tax year 2022 to 2023: Total income tax, male: 18900 £mil. Total income tax, female: 8320 £mil. Women earned 58% of what men earned (including dividends from inherited assets and retirement benefits; women's empl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:13 AM
4

Women are the majority of voters. p.s. even if you agree with me, there is nothing women should do about this because the price for a better society cannot be the erasure of women's autonomy. Women should stop voting for erasure of men's autonomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 09:36 AM

I’m not able to take it seriously. If I see it ... You all consistently seem like you make up things about women out of thin air... I can’t picture the terrible, wonderful, or average women in my life, and come up with the same conclusions as the rants you people come up with. To take what seriously? See what? What things? What rants? I’d probably just say stuff like “sorry, I drank too much. I love the music by the way”, not go on rants about the “true nature of women”. There have been a couple…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 11:31 PM
1

(90% of users are married men). No they aren't. a permanent roomate who pays half the bills No she doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 10:29 PM
1

“Oh no, some women make terrible decisions, We have statistics. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ib9lnc/the_bad_boy_tingles/ But last time I brought them up, I was told that all those women making all these decisions are hood rats. Well... thanks to your own example, we know that no, not all. And that was the one she picked. And? Liar, she did not pick him to be a sperm donor. He is co-parenting. She chose him to be an involved father to her son.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:13 PM
2

There are millions of cute potential sperm donors whose baby wouldn't be a grandson of rapist-murderer. Chloe could afford any of them; not only she chose Meeks, but he also has shared custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:01 PM
1

Yes, if women stop going after "meeks" it would not be a 100% solution. But stopping going after "meeks" would be a good start.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:55 PM
3

An heiress of 0.9B isn't necessarily a person with good mental health or a good situation at home or even just a sane or practical person - we've seen a lot of examples of kids with a "golden spoon" going completely sideways. Yes, but she still has more options than a trailer park girl, and it was OP's conscious choice to bring up the specific case (Meeks) that disproves her own point. There's a noticeable number of both men and women who go for unfit partners and/or stay with their partners who…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 01:39 PM
1

as if women solely go after badboys like Jeremy Meeks Meeks has two children with two different women, one is an heiress of $0.9B fortune. An heiress of 0.9B fortune could not find a better guy than a tattooed felon son of a rapist-murderer. Sure. Yes, if women stop going after "meeks" it would not be a 100% solution. But stopping going after "meeks" would be a good start. There is no fourth option. Either the problem stays unsolved, women solve it themselves, or men solve it for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 11:32 AM
2

Social power my ass. Financial power is everything. Women had nothing. "By 1800 in most states, sons and daughters received equal shares in real and personal property; there was no longer any meaningful distinction for purposes of children's inheritances." C. Shammas, M. Salmon & M. Dahlin, Inheritance in America from Colonial Times to the Present, 1987.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 07:39 AM

Since it's a CMV, I'll point out to one piece of evidence that contradicts this hypothesis: "among those ages 25 to 64, men outnumber women by a large margin among never-married adults (125 men for every 100 women), but men are outnumbered by women among previously married adults (71 men for every 100 women)." Pew Research Center. So guess what fades? That conditional attraction. You are seriously underestimating women's unwillingness to earn for themselves even when given every opportunity unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:41 PM

The Innernet: Tea App Reeeee! Me: Google, give me Pedro Pascal Anxiety memes.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 05:13 PM
2

They figured out nothing; they also followed the script and got paid for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 06:28 PM
2

I can't detect good or bad person in a paid actor based on 10-second clip of their performance in a single role. And it has nothing to do with gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 06:21 PM
2

followed the script
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 04:32 PM
2

I was talking about the video you posted, with balloons.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 03:47 PM
2

"A paid actor followed the script of an outrage TV slop factory, therefore he's probably a serial rapist" is an astonishing performance in the olympic reach. Please continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 03:31 PM
2

We get banned when we look at the actual context. Reddit made it clear and unambiguous that only the widely accepted dogma is appropriate context to look at: men only succeed when and because they keep women out and down because of teir own insecurity, fear, and thirst for power; women only fail for the same reason (that is, men's insecurity, fear, and thirst for power). You are not adding anything new by encouraging us to repeat this religious belief; it's been mainstream for 50+ years.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/25 09:23 AM

There are countries where women still have no rights The last country to give women the right to vote did so in 2011. The only place in the world where women don't vote, is city state of Vatican. If "universally unacceptable" is a stretch, so is "no rights".
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:51 AM
5

Thanks, I approve of every one of these. I mean of considering them as factors.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 12:08 PM
6

Meanwhile, all the other factors that increase divorce likelihood are conveniently neglected. Like what? Forcibly dragging one's wife away from lottery kiosks? Other factors are there, they're just more trivial and even worse.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 10:21 AM
1

Having so much adult entertainment content made for my sex is kinda nice. This is the only one that I can unambiguously say actually happened and benefitted me. I mean out of this checklist: https://nomas.org/male-privilege-checklist/
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 08:17 AM
2

https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1996
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 09:58 PM
1

Fuck one, marry the other, kill no-one.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 05:59 PM
2

"in early childhood, some studies suggest that the time girl children spend around the home might give them an advantage in the attention they receive from parents and increased access to food during food preparation [75]. Male children, on the other hand, might spend more time out of the house, playing with other male children, resulting in greater energy expenditure and exposure to environmental risks and sources of infection [73,75,76]." "For example, our personal communication with practitio…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 08:06 AM
-1

Bro. A sugary sweet is not a mercury-laced cookie. Sugar and salt are added in amounts detrimental to men's health more than to women's into virtually all of processed foods. Sometimes, not to call them "sugars", they're addressed by more neutral pronounames, such as "dextrose", for example in "Tesco Finest British Cumberland Sausages" (Walmart site doesn't work for me atm). Negotiating some me-time with your wife is not a societal responsibility Totally agreed; it is societal responsibility not…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 06:52 PM
1

Yes, women would also benefit from segregated hospitals.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 05:41 PM
-1

Men should not adapt to the imperfect system; the imperfect system should accomodate men. a lot of men seem to have decided that eating less red meat and more vegetables and such is feminine behavior and have stigmatized it. And yo, how y'all define masculinity is... weird? But your thing. 40% of boys are born out of wedlock. Because men consume more red meat and processed food. Red meat - either unlikely, or insignificantly. Processed food - yes, abstaining from processed food is a privilege th…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 05:32 PM
0

1-teach men how to cook and to not eat processed food. Okay. This is not really a gendered issue, I think. 3-if you know a way how to get rid of waiting times In what way is society preventing men from going on a stroll in the woods or somtehing? 55% of married men are responsible for 60%+ of household income; it is proven that if/when they stop being responsible, they also stop being married. I would say it puts certain logistical constraints on spending many hours a day strolling in the woods …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:48 PM
1

I don't know. I do know that cardiovascular disease is primary contributor to gender gap in mortality, and it's also linked to insufficient sleep. As a (recent) body weight control enthusiast, I can also say from personal experience that longer sleep makes it enormously easier to stay in shape.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:18 PM
5

Oof. I've seen this before. First of all, I approve of midnight_blue77 - we don't need alternatives to astrology or tarot reading. But here are some crucial steps society as a whole could take to make men's lives better: Food and drinks - most processed food available in an average grocery store is oversugared and oversalted. It doesn't make you feel sated, you eat more of it, you get fat, you turn into a whiny bitch, you put extra pressure on your heart, and you die of heart attack. ALL of avai…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 09:11 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissolution_of_the_Holy_Roman_Empire#/media/File:Wien-khm-kunstkammer-francis1-0.jpg This guy looks like a young skinny deliberately uglified actor playing Zuckerberg.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 05:15 PM
1

I detect a shift happening in the modern dating landscape, especially in real-life social settings. "I feel it in the water. I feel it in the earth. Also, what's that smell?"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 05:10 PM

"among those ages 25 to 64, men outnumber women by a large margin among never-married adults (125 men for every 100 women), but men are outnumbered by women among previously married adults (71 men for every 100 women)." Pew Research Center. I'm using "marriage" as proxy for "commitment" because the latter (same as "exclusivity") aren't available in surveys. But please keep telling us how "women are pressured" by some mystical invisible force to marry, while men aren't. I am not going to try to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 08:26 AM
1

Re-read your own comment for better context. "Women weren’t allowed in them" is false. Make your own places and allow yourselves in however you like. Women never "had to" force their way in; they chose to pretend they don't understand consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:15 PM
1

Most children make peace with the fact that other kids may have better toys by the first grade. In the US, women had their own bank in 1919. It operated for 7 years until its founder and president resigned, and no-one of her colleagues agreed to replace her. Or in other words, 'Not men's problem' happened, and then it was made men's problem, which by total coincidence of course was followed by a massive mortgage rate increase. It costs zero dollars not to be an evil little shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 06:42 PM
2

But from where I sit, women are carrying both loads — and men are the ones with the wider behavioral range. On average, married men in intact families with children carried greater total workload than their female counterparts in year 2016, just as they did in year 1965. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/06/12/fathers-day-facts/ Earlier Pew report from 2011 (claiming dads worked less back in 1965) apparently contained an error, estimating dads' paid workload down by 4 hours. Of course…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 03:15 PM
2

That’s not a circular argument If you dismiss anyone who isn't a perpetually online basement dweller "as not real manosphere", then "manosphere is perpetually online basement dwellers" is circular. Angelucci was manosphere enough for Cassie Jaye's documentary. If Angelucci isn't wasn't manosphere (sit tibi terra levis), then those who gave women the right to vote weren't feminists. Literally the suffrage movement "Those are not real Scotsmen." Here's scan of 19th amendment resolution signed by F…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:36 PM
3

I don't engage in circular arguments; it's lazy, waste of my time, and anyone can do it: "not a single person who actually gave women the right to vote was a feminist; they just took credit for it after."
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 01:13 PM
2

You can fast-forward to the point where you dismiss me for being an irrelevant foreigner; no need to retell the entirety of Narcissist's Prayer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 12:35 PM
2

Not a single real world example yet. Woods v. Horton, 2008.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 08:47 AM
2

Female extremists and male extremists mutually push each other away And loving every second of it (raises a fine china cup of tea)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 07:06 PM
2

Two questions. One, what is "expensive tech"? "Tech" is about making things cheap. Steam engine did more for elimination of slavery than any war or revolution. With technology, things become progressively cheaper; many pieces of tech are functionally free just because they're obsolete. What was the estimate, half a billion? One billion? of perfectly functional cellphones get thrown away every year just because their owners wanted to upgrade. When my last motherboard died, I gave away surviving s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 03:58 PM
2

A felon is someone that got caught. Yes. In the world where telepathy doesn't exist, we kinda have to rely on proxies and markers when collecting statistical data. There's also at least one longitudinal study showing that 10% of men scoring the highest on antisociality tests also father 27% of children, but it had its limitations. That means he's either stupid or did something actually bad (child molester, rapist, murderer). None of that is desirable. Felons convicted of non-sexual violence, exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:29 PM
2

That is irrelevant to what I said though. I don't care if it's "more than most women believe," my point is about it being at equal rates to men. Okay, sorry for wasting your time then.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 02:10 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbHPDYTyLQg Is Age of Ugly really over, or is she being over-optimistic?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 11:49 AM
1

If a woman desires “bad boy” traits from a guy in order to be attracted to him she doesn’t truly like him I don't care. Felons marry at higher rates than non-felons, and effect for men is also higher. Felons have more children than non-felons, and effect for men is higher. This is bad enough. I don't care if all these marriages were hate-unions, and all those conceptions were from hate-fucking. I don't advise men to imitate bad boy behavior in order to "get women", because that's just pedestaliz…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 10:12 AM
8

Cool; I love studies, and I will surely take your word for these studies existing, being well-conducted, and saying exactly what you claim they're saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:50 PM
7

All the articles I read say women were the main victims. Same. "Meteorite hits Earth, women most affected". After looking through about 10 articles on the subject I found one entire man reported as being stabbed I also looked through probably the same 10 articles and eventually through the original article they all referenced. This original article mentioned 2 female victims and 1 male victim in details, and just mentioned that there were more. That's a third. What men also were the third of, fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:40 PM
13

Oh really where did I say only women? "Words matter France on June 21st, (During a nationwide music festival) 145 women and teenage girls were attacked with needles across multiple cities. This wasn’t a random event it was a coordinated act of violence, and at least 12 suspects have been arrested. These were deliberate attacks targeting females. This was not some isolated incident, it was a country wide misogynistic assault involving a lot of people to pull off." https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePi…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 05:34 PM
12

mostly young women A couple weeks ago it was "only women". coordinated attack was linked to manosphere Source?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 04:48 PM
5

Tactful respect is not a right when you are invader. Men's spaces existed for centuries with no problem, until women one day got compulsive desire to destroy them for no reason, and started spreading this idea among themselves and each other like a plague.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 04:41 PM
5

We should take the things they say online as factual. Do. This is me, online, begging you and all your sisterhooders to. Leave. Men. Alone. The men I see on here everyday justifying rape and pedophilia You can't see it "on here"; mods yeet such commenters or posters instantly, and Reddit (I'm pretty certain) uses automated bots to locate mentions of certain topics and ban their posters. If you surf through darknet forums out of your own free will, that's on you. fantasizing about enslaving women…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/25 02:58 PM
1

In order to prove your point, the number of female offenders should be close to the number of male ones. This shouldn't need any additional qualifiers, much less based on the sexual orientation of the victim. You are right; I am actually misquoting the paper here; it says nothing about sexual orientation. Didn't fact-check this part when posted, and didn't recheck until now. Either you have the data that directly supports your narrative of women committing these crimes at the same rates of men o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 11:50 PM
2

Where's your data we do all of these things anywhere close as much as men do? Last time I posted it on PPD, the post got removed by mods. Here's text of that post, look up the links yourself: National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, United States, 2011: estimated 1.6 million women and 1.7 million men - were "raped or made to penetrate" in the last 12 months (the survey administrator, feminist writer and academic Mary P. Koss, refused to categorize men who experienced unwanted sexual…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:44 PM
1

At the same time, any time the other side of that non-conformity is stated - like men over-indexing in deviancy, the very opposite of conformity - men rush to explain and equivocate how women are just as bad. Women sexually assault and rape as much as men do, or more. Women cheat as much as men do, or more. Women abuse as much as men do, or more. Women rape, assault, cheat, and abuse much more than most women believe. And as a guy with memory spanning longer than that of a goldfish, I remember t…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 10:01 AM
0

RPers often argue that going for prolonged periods without sex is comparitively much worse for their mental health than an hour or two in a place of worship each weekend and a lessening of certain recreational activities. Either you bring the source for this claim, or there is nothing to discuss. After all, if "RPers" argue this "often", it shouldn't be a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/25 09:44 AM
2

what am i supposed to do about some woman i don’t know having a baby from a felon? Recognize that her behavior will affect your wallet; I am not expecting you personally to single-handedly solve everything. More babies predisposed to crime == more criminals (adjusted for however little you can fix with more "better schools"; except better schools turn to crap when there are too many children predisposed to crime in class, therefore - less better schools, and even more criminals). More criminals …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 08:48 AM
2

what is even the point of your first paragraph? it has nothing to do with what i said. Okay, let me rephrase it as a response. "don’t you think it’s likely male offenders and the women they fuck are less likely to use protection? people nowadays have lower fertility rates because they actually care about their potential children. anyone could have a high fertility rate if they plan on abandoning the kid afterwards." - So what, therefore it's not a problem and shouldn't be solved? Or therefore me…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 12:42 AM
2

The problem of "explosive breeding pattern" of convict men can be dealt with in three ways. One, it is left unsolved and declared not a problem. Two, women solve it with their decision-making power over reproduction. Three, men solve it for women, and women will nag and whine and complain for the next millenium that men's solution was cruel and unusual. your beautiful classmate is probably also a neo nazi. I am 100% certain she wasn't. Maybe she is now, we haven't been in touch for years, but to…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 10:20 PM
3

This is most likely not the case for the reasons I outlined in my overview of this paper. Fertility rate of men offenders EXCLUDING ALL children mothered by women offenders (assuming that all their fathers were offenders): 0.778 - STILL higher than reported fertility rate of non-offender men of 0.74. I repeat: fertility rate of criminal men solely with non-criminal baby mamas is higher than fertility [rate] of non-criminal men... Finally, table 7 investigates if reproductive advantage persists a…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 06:20 PM
3

Let's take a number - 5,000. How many of those do you think would be ruled out by the specific criteria you're focusing on for the average woman? Violent men with criminal records? We don't have to guess. In the paper I'm referencing, out of the nationwide sample of 2,483,243 resident men born and living in the country within the chosen time frame, 158,227 were convicted of "Any non-sexual violent crime". This is 1 out of every 16. Only 3,358 (1 in 740) were convicted of rape or sexual coercion …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 12:28 AM
3

So basically don't be sexually attracted to bad men? Be attracted to each and every one of them if you want, or don't. Just don't give birth to their children. When a woman willingly increases the chances that her future son will grow up with things like anger issues, everyone suffers. Not just her, or her son, or the man she is having the son with (assuming he is in the picture), not just grandparents, or school teachers, or juvie officers; everyone. We had two threads in a row last week(?) jus…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 11:02 PM
3

That doesn't answer how to filter for the guys "Regardless of the means." I don't know, run his name through newspaper and court archives; interview his childhood friends and relatives; construct a timeline of his life and see if there's a weird gap of 3 years between the ages of 24 and 27; take a couple cuddly close-up selfies with him and ask strangers on the Internet what those tattoos mean (because apparently just choosing a guy without tattoos is too much to ask); notice if for some weird r…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:24 PM
-1

They just frame it as “I dominate, you submit” “man meant to lead woman meant to follow.” One other thing they're saying is "heterosexual marriage is a captain/first mate dynamic". One needs to be even further than brain-dead to sincerely think that THE FIRST MATE is the BOTTOM of the ship's chain of command (or the bottom half). And if this is how women choose to misinterpret the message of the Manosphere, I can only repeat its other message. "Women's only proof of oppression is that they don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:03 PM
7

I have said it many times, and I will say it again. Not explosively breeding with violent convicts in the most feminist nation on Earth would be a great start. Regardless of the means. Not a particularly high bar either. https://np.reddit.com/user/abaxeron/comments/1ib9lnc/the_bad_boy_tingles/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:54 PM
3

She’s saying something that men say. No; she is saying something that Carol Gilligan says. https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/1lxs7kk/modern_relationships_dont_fail_because_of_one/n2phhq9/
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:50 PM
3

My main points of reference are "The Second Sex" and "The Feminine Mystique"; both notoriously un-systemic, meandering, emotionally charged ramblings arriving at conclusions experimentally proven false based on premises historically proven false. Both are written in style and manner of "pop feminism" but for some ungodly reason considered works of philosophy. TSS was the most insane one, as after turning the last page and scratching the back of my head, I went on to look at overviews and college…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:22 PM
6

That does not reflect modern-day realities. Nothing reflects modern-day realities; I've had women on PPD claiming that women had no rights 20 years ago. I had to remind them that "20 years ago" was after 9/11. Yet, I will insist that it is valid to cite Plato when discussing Platonism, to cite Marx when discussing Marxism, and to cite Mary Wollstonecraft when discussing feminism. Read bell hooks No; she is stupid; I am not sacrificing my IQ points on this slop. Carol Gilligan "Patriarchy is an o…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 10:46 AM
1

"Hierarchy on the basis of sex" means that one sex is the oppressor class, and the other is the oppressed class. Mary Wollstonecraft and Decalration of Sentiments are not "pop feminism".
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:45 AM
4

I’ve noticed that both feminist movements and men’s groups (Redpill, Goldpill, Blackpill, and all those “pills”) seem to believe that the problem with society is entirely the other gender. Some say: if all men abandoned toxic masculinity, the world would be fixed. Others say: if all women stopped being independent feminists, we’d live in peace. Hard disagree. Unlike feminism, broader manosphere does not view the opposite sex as the oppressor class. It views "gender struggle", for lack of a bette…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 08:37 AM
2

Feminism views men as the oppressor class; anyone having doubts about it can just read feminist books.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 07:33 AM
1

Men protect and provide because if they don't then you men may as well not even exsist, it's that simple. If this is you admitting that women are not heterosexual, then No, I am not surprised at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/25 12:01 AM
1

I see guys saying all the time how, because sex is a need for males, then women should at least give them that I_see_dead_people.png I am not a person who ever argued that women should give sex to strangers, and I wouldn't want to give one. However, if my "girl-bro" in such a parallel reality approached me and asked to help out with the itch, I can offer gloved manual therapy and mechanized massage, like in good ol' Victorian times. Then also some cuddles and a small cup of ice cream. Abaxie Jr.…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:49 PM
1

Yes; and the man of the house encouraging his woman to stay slim and therefore less stressed in this scenario is not a villain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 10:37 PM
2

There's plenty of men on welfare and disability that hate women after all but they don't receive the same amount of ire outside of the types who think all welfare is wrong. when OP is... was talking of society as a whole, and the feminist movement spent the last... 15? 20? years talking about "male privilege", it's obvious that we all speak of statistical realities, not individual ones. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Life-expectancy-with-and-without-disability-by-gender-and-age_fig2_3089860…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:51 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter