TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

alclarkey Archive

View 53 posts and 4,109 comments by alclarkey on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1089

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights17/12/24 10:14 AM
803

False Accusationalclarkey/r/MensRights13/12/24 03:13 AM
291

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights18/12/24 01:50 AM
254

Humouralclarkey/r/MensRights13/03/21 07:20 PM
227

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights12/11/17 01:05 AM
199

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights06/07/23 02:41 PM
199

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights25/02/25 09:38 PM
174

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights05/03/21 10:55 PM
136

Marriage/Childrenalclarkey/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:28 PM
131

Discriminationalclarkey/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:04 AM
131

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights13/05/26 12:45 AM
115

Humouralclarkey/r/MensRights19/04/25 02:29 PM
113

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights05/02/21 02:41 PM
90

alclarkey/r/MensRights01/04/17 12:49 PM
61

Legal Rightsalclarkey/r/MensRights18/11/21 11:20 PM
60

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights29/04/26 01:47 AM
47

False Accusationalclarkey/r/MensRights13/01/19 12:26 PM
47

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights23/08/15 03:51 AM
41

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights20/07/17 10:20 PM
41

Activism/Supportalclarkey/r/MensRights21/03/21 01:42 PM
34

Activism/Supportalclarkey/r/MensRights18/07/25 07:38 PM
33

Humouralclarkey/r/MensRights14/05/24 12:32 AM
30

Red Pill Examplealclarkey/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 01:26 AM
26

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights22/09/18 01:30 PM
26

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:22 AM
25

Progressalclarkey/r/MensRights02/12/18 03:59 PM
23

Progressalclarkey/r/MensRights21/12/20 10:32 PM
20

Fathers/Custodyalclarkey/r/MensRights02/11/15 09:21 PM
18

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights26/11/22 04:36 PM
10

False Accusationalclarkey/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:45 PM
10

Discriminationalclarkey/r/MensRights05/01/19 06:51 PM
10

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:07 PM
9

alclarkey/r/MensRights17/02/20 12:14 AM
8

alclarkey/r/askTRP15/05/14 08:48 PM
8

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights14/10/15 12:39 AM
7

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights03/08/17 09:15 PM
7

alclarkey/r/MensRights30/10/16 02:54 PM
7

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:26 PM
6

alclarkey/r/MensRights11/07/16 07:57 PM
6

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights07/09/18 08:51 PM
5

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights19/04/18 09:08 PM
5

alclarkey/r/askTRP21/09/18 05:36 PM
2

Humouralclarkey/r/MensRights18/03/18 09:34 PM
1

alclarkey/r/MensRights06/09/15 10:40 PM
1

Questionsalclarkey/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:21 AM
1

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights01/11/17 08:43 PM
1

Activism/Supportalclarkey/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:07 AM
0

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights13/12/22 12:46 AM
0

Feminismalclarkey/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:14 PM
0

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights16/12/22 01:58 AM
0

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights11/03/21 10:11 PM
0

Social Issuesalclarkey/r/MensRights27/05/18 09:00 PM
0

Generalalclarkey/r/MensRights08/03/23 03:23 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,109 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Not sure you have a point, there are plenty of women who were abused by a men, or multiple men, who didn't turn into raging man-haters. In fact most of these women who post this man bashing crap probably have not been abused, they're just fucking bigots.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 08:10 PM
6

I was talking about the hashtag in the title. And like I said, it was more just a joke than anything. It was too convenient not to use.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:48 PM
7

No. It was tongue in cheek. If I want anything, it's to get the pendulum to zero. And the only place you'll ever see me use that hashtag is on a manbashing post. So if you're not bashing men, you won't see it.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:28 PM
6

LMAO, Where do you think I got it from?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:20 PM
6

It's not all feminists, but it's always a feminist.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:17 PM
3

No. But the lectures are feminist in nature.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:14 PM
10

The whole thing is absurd. The only evidence we have that a person feels like the opposite gender is in their head, where we can't go. Maybe in a couple hundred years when we've perfected mind reading technology. And another thing, how does a trans person know that what they feel like is the opposite gender? They've only ever been what they are, they have no frame of reference to judge by. I'm not sure if using their system against them counts as being conservative, or just pro-male.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 08:31 PM
3

She was dropping off his doordash order, noticed the door was slightly ajar and decided to do a little snooping. Opened the door to find a man 3 sheets to the wind passed out on his couch with no trousers on. Took a video of the situation, posted it to tiktok claiming she had been sexually assaulted by seeing the man naked. Original video shows her pushing the door open, but she claimed it was wide open, trying to make the claim that the man was purposefully trying to get her to see him naked. I…
/r/MensRights24/11/25 09:53 PM
2

Regardless, CR is most certainly not the first female MRA.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 07:58 PM
1

Don't know.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 07:58 PM
29

No doubt. Though part of that incompetence is always assuming guilt in a man, even in the most absurd circumstances, like this.
/r/MensRights19/04/25 03:05 PM
7

That I don't know.
/r/MensRights25/02/25 10:41 PM
1

I didn't say that. Only thing I'm asking for is that not everything a man does or doesn't do is judged as malicious.
/r/MensRights23/12/24 10:20 AM
1

Fair enough. Hard to tell these days.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 11:31 AM
1

Woman proves MRAs right by using "mansplaining" as catchall cudgel against her opponents.
/r/MensRights20/12/24 11:24 AM
0

I'm not sure where you can pull that I have a problem with veterans from what I've posted.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 04:15 AM
2

You do realize though the second amendment had nothing to do with hunting? You also realize that rifle murders (AR-15 is a rifle) are only 2.6%? Edit: Another thing to note, I'm a 2nd amendment advocate, but I'm not necessarily ok with sport hunting. I've been convinced (for now) that it's about conservation. Deer are some horney MFers, and the more of them there are, the more car/deer accidents there are, the more gardens get detroyed, better dead by rifle shot than in the grill of some car. Bu…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 03:23 AM
2

For sure. Not interested in banning guns though. Because the founders of this country stated "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." And I believe them. Besides, I doubt it would help. There are portions of America where every home in a particular neighboorhood has guns in it, but haven't seen a murder with any weapon in their town for decades. So if you have other ideas on how to stop these tragedies (including gang…
/r/MensRights19/12/24 02:57 AM
2

Well, if you're including gang violence, then it may be the 488th. But it certainly isn't the 488th episode of "random senseless act of multiple murder"
/r/MensRights19/12/24 02:43 AM
-1

It's all true. I did mention that he is going through depression, which we're all trying to take care of him. But did you happen to notice the name of the post was about mansplaining? If it was about male suicide, I would have said that in the post title.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 01:24 AM
0

Look, dude, the post wasn't about male suicide. It was about the automatic assumption of malice in actions men take. As far as supporting my uncle goes, the whole family is already doing it. I wasn't looking for advice in that area.
/r/MensRights19/12/24 12:50 AM
2

The point was that the need for men to feel useful is powerful enough to drive us to suicide.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 09:08 PM
1

My uncle is not the focus of story. It was only to point of that his lack of being needed is part of what is driving him to it.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 09:07 PM
2

I did say it was about mansplaining didn't I?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 07:34 PM
3

I've researched the phenomenon. I know what feminists think it is, and yes that would frustrating if true. The thing I am challenging is the notion that everything men do that frustrates women about men is due to malice.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:26 PM
3

I'm well aware of what feminists think mansplaining is about.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 05:24 PM
7

No, it has nothing to with requiring a woman to fix my uncle. It was intended to make the point that men very strongly need to feel useful, and the assumption when they "mansplain" is that they are doing out of malice, which is offensive.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 10:28 AM
4

Hey asshole, what exactly do you find funny. There's some kind of reason for men to kill themselves 3x as often. Depression is a big one. Do you really think men don't want to feel useful?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 04:59 AM
1

And they fight about a bunch of other bullshit too. The Rwandan genocide? Racism. Black people killing other black people who looked a little different.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 03:19 AM
2

https://www.google.com/search?q=reasons+for+war+percentage&sca_esv=edcd41b4d17ba481&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS926US926&sxsrf=ADLYWIIln3SurMvdmJ44uYo0mWGWxLrXDA%3A1734491602448&ei=0j1iZ4KKG7qlptQP1ovcyQc&ved=0ahUKEwiCu9HerLCKAxW6kokEHdYFN3kQ4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=reasons+for+war+percentage&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiGnJlYXNvbnMgZm9yIHdhciBwZXJjZW50YWdlMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUi2K1CVBljVKHADeAGQAQCYAZABoAHECaoBBDEwLjO4AQPIAQD4AQGYAhCgAuoJwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICDRAAGIAEGLADGEMYigXCAgsQABiABBiRAhiKBcICBRA…
/r/MensRights18/12/24 03:16 AM
1

Which chapter and verse of the bible talks about eradicating all men?
/r/MensRights18/12/24 03:09 AM
46

I thought about paying to take care of my yard. There's about a 1/2 acre of yard that needs taking care of.
/r/MensRights18/12/24 02:17 AM
12

How exactly does wanting to eradicate men make it far right?
/r/MensRights17/12/24 02:21 PM
1

Well someone pointed out somewhere that they got a 20 million dollar settlement from the University, so I guess they can wipe their tears with $100 bills. But that isn't true justice unless this woman gets at least 10 more years tacked onto her sentence for it.
/r/MensRights14/12/24 08:18 PM
2

It would cost them thousands in lawyer fees to get absolutely nothing. She's already in prison, and has zero assets and no money.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 02:12 PM
2

She's a stripper. That's her stripper name.
/r/MensRights13/12/24 01:37 PM
1

Probably fewer diseases too.
/r/MensRights10/11/24 05:06 AM
6

I'm sorry, but I've gone down the Diddy rabbit hole. Turns out he had a whole ass child sex trafficking ring going on, and a good portion of the people accusing him of wrongdoing are men, including Bieber and Usher. In fact, Diddy is currently paying a complete nobody, a guy sitting in prison for 16 counts of sexual assault himself, $10 million/month for RAPING HIM WHILE HE WAS UNCONSCIOUS. I'm as big of a men's rights supporter as you will find, but I ask you, please don't defend Diddy. The lev…
/r/MensRights25/09/24 01:40 PM
2

Just remember Matt Damon got into hot water when he suggested that there sexual harassment/assault/rape was on a spectrum of seriousness. Though he wasn't wrong, staring at a good looking woman for too long, while creepy and wrong is certainly not the same thing as holding her down and penetrating her against her will. Which just makes me loath feminists all the more. You can't clown on my man Jason Bourne like that.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 09:14 PM
1

There is definitely such a thing as sexual harassment. If you watch that episode, Charlie, a very naive, sheltered 17 year old boy slapped yeoman Janice Rand on the bottom. No, they're not dating, no she showed no interest in him beforehand, he just did it. In case you didn't know, you're not allowed to do that.
/r/MensRights14/05/24 07:45 PM
-1

👏👏👏
/r/MensRights14/05/24 01:10 AM
-3

Shouldn't the name "Kirk" tell you where it came from?
/r/MensRights14/05/24 12:55 AM
6

Just to add, most rapists are Chads. And the psychology makes sense. How do people used to getting what they want react when someone finally says no?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:08 AM
-1

Get in touch with her, maybe go on a few dates and see if you can make a relationship work with her. If not you should at least make every effort to be in your child's life. Study, after study has shown greater outcomes for adults who's father was around while they were growing up.
/r/MensRights06/02/24 02:04 AM
9

"Weed induced frenzy"? The judge actually bought that shit?
/r/MensRights25/01/24 12:07 AM
5

See if you can get the generic version of it. I got a whole course for $4. If your doctor won't prescribe the generic version of it, it's likely he's getting kickbacks from the drug company. Find a new one if that's the case.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 02:49 AM
3

I know the medication for it, and yes the name brand costs $250, but I got the generic for $4 and it made my toenail fungus go away, that and I was also soaking my toes in apple cider vinegar which might have had something to do with it.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 02:47 AM
4

What's there to think about? It's just raw unadulterated sexism/tribalism.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 08:03 PM
3

Unpaid labor has value for the household. But it really isn't unpaid is it? If your wife is a SAHW, her unpaid labor is paid by not having to pay rent, utilities, groceries, her husband does that. The real debate comes when trying to figure out how much that labor is worth, and for the well paid man, lawyers and whatnot it's only a fraction of what he brings in. However, most men don't care about that. We only started caring about it when feminists made a thing about it.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 10:46 PM
17

I would give them the danger of being accused of sexual harassment if you touch someone on the shoulder reassuringly or any other non-offensive touching. It amazes me how free women are to just touch and get absolutely no consequences for it.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 03:39 PM
1

That's like saying "I walked outside and found a rock on the ground". Plenty of moronic dudes out there to simp for feminism.
/r/MensRights18/08/23 12:15 AM
5

Just throw Hitchen's Razor at them: "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
/r/MensRights15/08/23 10:52 PM
6

I imagine that if it does jam you up, you have a case for a lawsuit against the military, and your false accuser.
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:34 PM
4

Sounds like a lot of bullets dodged.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:30 PM
3

This dynamic was particularly pronounced at my old job at a foundry. The foundry floor was about as close to actual hell on earth as you can get. You walk in, it's loud, smoky, dusty, dirty, dark, hot and there's red hot metal being poured, and the floor looks straight out of one of Saruman's factories. The work is hard, lots of heavy lifting, sharp edges, etc. I once had my boots start on fire. And then of course there's the stress put on you to meet production quotas which were made when the m…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:06 PM
1

I'm gonna go with American Beauty.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:02 PM
3

I have a concealed carry license. I'll defend myself from the woman with my hands. White knights will have to make the choice of taking one step closer, and not getting shot.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:10 PM
3

I would imagine whatever argument was happening faded away when her boyfriend did that.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:08 PM
3

If I defend myself from a woman, and a white knight decides to avenge m'lady, well, I guess I'm defending myself from him too, without pulling my punches.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:07 PM
3

Until the fact that she has bruises on her arms from where you grabbed her is used against you in court. And women do bruise fairly easily.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:19 PM
2

In my state we have castle doctrine which says you are allowed to meet force with force, women are not immune, you can hit back if it's for the purpose of stopping her from hitting you.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 09:19 PM
3

Which doesn't make sense to me. John Wick murdering a guy with a pencil takes a whole hell of a lot more raw aggression and malice than the guy who calls in a drone strike on some poor schmuck. If anything, murder with an implement ill-suited to the task should be regarded as an even more heinous crime.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:45 AM
1

Sure.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:43 PM
1

Half/third? You mean per year, every month?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:50 PM
6

So it's not murder if you don't use a gun or knife?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 07:41 PM
1

The problem is there are people in our lives that we do care about spouting feminist shaming bullshit. My sister is a prime example. When they repeat it, it's bound to hurt.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 06:47 PM
1

Like I said to the guy above, this was a great line from Tywin, but it ultimately falls flat. You're lying to yourself if you say the shaming doesn't hurt at least a little.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:13 PM
3

For someone's opinion to effect me I have to respect the holder of said opinion. As much as I like the sentiment, I'm gonna have to disagree. You're fooling yourself if you think those little digs and shaming doesn't hurt to some degree. It's a fantasy.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:11 PM
2

Well affirmative action has already been struck down in college admissions, I suspect a lot of companies are going to see the writing on the wall that affirmative action hiring practices are next, and will back off from them to avoid lawsuits enabled by the next SC decisions, and for those companies that don't..... Let the lawsuits commence. 😈
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:35 PM
2

Start recording, and if the harassment continues start a Title IX case against her.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 10:20 PM
9

Looks like the "right track" leads right into a KKK bonfire. Got any evidence to back up trying to label 20 million people as the worst possible thing a human can be?
/r/MensRights25/07/23 03:11 AM
6

Great illustration of the apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 02:34 PM
5

But what exactly were they trying to accomplish, I'd like to know. Did they just decide it was fuck-over-some-random-dude day?
/r/MensRights11/07/23 09:33 PM
0

LAWSUIT.
/r/MensRights09/07/23 01:19 AM
5

Clearly to who? Both concepts, me getting pissed off over the accusatory stink eye when I forget something, and being accused of literal weaponized incompetence, both involve accusing me of some sort of malice. That's the connection I made.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 03:42 AM
3

disingenuous. How?
/r/MensRights07/07/23 02:27 AM
4

I'm talking about being accused of it.
/r/MensRights06/07/23 11:01 PM
1

"Enjoy being single" is just a dumb line. I hope she seriously doesn't think that women are capable of sensing malice in man and will avoid the bad ones....
/r/MensRights06/07/23 03:03 AM
0

Unequal outcomes is never sufficient reason for discrimination and unequal application of the law. And frankly I'm not in support of eliminating child support any way. People should support their own offspring, not the taxpayer. The real problem with the child support system IMO is excessive child support orders.
/r/MensRights05/07/23 01:48 PM
1

Depends where you live. Seriously laws are different by country, but attitudes towards men and divorce and custody also very wildly by individual counties and even neighborhoods. It helps to know where you are.
/r/MensRights03/07/23 07:02 PM
1

There's no need to be rational, as a person trying to kidnap someone's child because they deemed with little or no evidence that that child was in danger, is not acting with heaps of rationality themselves. Kick, punch, scream, shoot, whatever you have to protect your child.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 07:56 PM
2

It has happened to other people. Just gotta exercise that google muscle a little.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 07:38 PM
1

Allowing? No. Make no mistake, they approved of her actions in that crime.
/r/MensRights27/06/23 07:27 PM
3

Caring about the race and sex of cyclists is racist and sexist. Just let people be for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights23/06/23 09:18 PM
21

"Went FTM trans cuz men have such a great gig, and figured I'd scoop up some of that sweet, sweet male privilege" seems almost too trite to be the correct answer, but it sure would explain some things.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 07:06 PM
3

There might be a good reason you were his only friend.
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:10 PM
16

It's almost like incel hate is based in almost complete ignorance of what an incel actually is. Not to mention they haven't taken the time to understand an incel's pain, because incels are mostly men. And who gives a fuck about them amirite?
/r/MensRights15/06/23 08:07 PM
1

Well, apparently pedophilia is halal under Islam, so.....
/r/MensRights15/06/23 07:05 PM
1

In r/mensrights? #sobrave
/r/MensRights15/06/23 01:32 AM
3

Is this the same U.N. that declared that children can consent to sex? I wouldn't take anything they have to say or report seriously. In fact, can we like, stop sending them money, right fucking now?
/r/MensRights13/06/23 07:19 PM
3

Well now they have the opportunity, where are the inventions?
/r/MensRights09/06/23 09:35 PM
2

You are right on the money. The feminist movement had jumped the shark. The only things they have left to complain about are made up.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 11:32 PM
3

I don't live there, but from what I've been hearing about it, it sounds like you can say that again.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:02 PM
1

after i said i had a laywer ready ( i dont) If you absolutely had no sexual contact of any kind with this person consensual or otherwise, I feel like bluffing like this is actually a good idea, it seems to work. My state is a two-party consent state when it comes to video recording, so technically recording a sexual liaison surreptitiously would be illegal. But I seriously doubt many women know that, so if one does decide to falsely accuse you of rape, you can tell her, you got her on video. I m…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:59 PM
1

Crimson Tide? They did make it a point to show us that Denzel's character (And his friend for that matter) were consummate good fathers. Just a damn good movie whatever way you slice it. Favorite scene: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GB2SDmV9oDs&t=305s
/r/MensRights29/05/23 02:52 PM
1

Applied for my state's temporary rental assistance program. Denied. Reason given? The rent on my apartment was unaffordable. The rent on my $300/mo apartment was unaffordable. You fill in the blanks as to the real reason I was denied.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:21 AM
1

Glad to have you. Personally, I think we need people observing family court proceedings. What we need right now to move forward is cold hard data. Lots of data. Small sample sizes won't cut it to convince society to make changes. Our data has to be ironclad.
/r/MensRights28/05/23 02:14 AM
2

men are getting tired of being constantly discriminated against, gaslit, ignored, and insulted. Don't get me wrong, I wasn't advocating this situation as acceptable, just understandable. And this quote right here resonates with me, I agree 100.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:31 PM
3

The problem is, that there is a massive cult of mediocrity affecting the world of late. And this is just one facet of this major problem.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 07:28 PM
-8

Well, the way our reproduction cycles work it kind of makes this sort of inevitable. Men are not valued because you could kill off most of the male population, and still be able to easily repopulate the planet.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 01:20 AM
30

Straight white male here. It's ok to be that.
/r/MensRights23/05/23 01:02 AM
1

"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin." -Ronald Reagan
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:28 AM
-1

Capitalism may hurt women and minorities, but communism starves them.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:25 AM
3

That is idiotic. Bromances aren't taught, they just happen.
/r/MensRights21/05/23 04:08 AM
1

It sounds like she's getting her ducks in a row and divorce you, and then use the things as allegations against you in court. Crazy? Not so much.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:07 PM
29

There's no surviving a rape in charge is Aus then. If you do get charged, prolly better prepare to change your name and flee the country.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:01 PM
1

It kind of seems like a slow replacement style coup.
/r/MensRights10/05/23 07:51 PM
4

idk why as I’m not as good looking now as I was. IDK, I would think extremely handsome men are somehow untouchable to them, so maybe you just seem more accessible, now that you're older?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:05 PM
3

You wasted 2 whole hours? You poor child.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 09:00 PM
2

Preaching to choir, brother.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 01:49 AM
2

If anyone calls the police it should be him, but if you do, make sure you make it very clear that you think HE'S the victim, we don't need the police showing up, and further victimizing him.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:32 PM
6

To this person, listen not.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:28 PM
3

Mensrights doesn't gatekeep, welcome aboard!
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:27 PM
1

IDK, I would think being found "not guilty" is preferable to "not proven".
/r/MensRights03/05/23 11:04 PM
1

With men, maybe.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 11:51 PM
26

Without a jury is massive human rights violation, and Scotland should be fucking ashamed of themselves.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 06:14 PM
1

When this is your complaint, you should know that your movement has jumped the shark.
/r/MensRights29/04/23 04:49 PM
-6

Getting rid of the "Not proven" may actually be a benefit to the rape accused. Hear me out. Rape is already a hard to prove crime, if the only thing left is guilty or not guilty, most of them will be found not guilty, which IMO is actually a stronger verdict than "Not proven".
/r/MensRights28/04/23 03:51 AM
2

Well, by the time she's a mother she should have been able to lock a guy down. Short guys don't get that option. They're short and they're stuck with it. Also there's no workout, no calorie plan that can make a short guy taller, so you ragging on short men is far worse than me ragging on fat women. And FTR, I'm OK with women with a little extra from just normal living, it's the obese ones I don't much care for, the ones who only got that way through gluttony. And there are plenty of them with so…
/r/MensRights27/04/23 01:05 AM
0

Women are socialized to think shorter men are less desirable Do you have any evidence at all to back up this statement?
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:17 PM
4

Except you can choose to not be fat, it takes work and discipline but it's doable. No amount of work and discipline can make a short man tall.
/r/MensRights24/04/23 11:13 PM
1

Man up, IE grit is an important trait for men to have. However there's a caveat, you can't man up to a freight train, and people who use this term need to be careful how they apply it.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 09:36 PM
2

The answer is in the title. It's just flat out sexism. If it weren't for double standards, feminists would have none.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 09:29 PM
2

Being trans is not a disease, No it's a mental disorder. What else would you diagnose someone with who thinks they're the opposite gender from the one they were born with?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 09:14 PM
5

The answer is: actually, yes you can be racist and sexist against white men, and that is exactly what this bitch was doing.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 09:00 PM
2

Nothing especially weird, just your garden variety isms. Unfortunately humanity gravitates towards these fairly easily.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 08:59 PM
6

CPS and the family courts and their counterparts in the rest of the world are absolutely anti-male to the point of absurdity sometimes. This is probably where the biggest MRA fight is TBH.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 09:41 PM
1

The ACA was the biggest sexist piece of trash I have ever seen. It was a take from men and give to women bill.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:04 AM
21

The cheaters themselves. Which is understandable. But in this case, our complaint is with the outside observers. And it is a quite common refrain "well what did he do?"
/r/MensRights14/03/23 01:00 AM
8

I just finished having this argument on reddit the other day with a redditor who is apparently an other guy. I finally got fed up and told him, dude, you're a homewrecker, you have no credit.
/r/MensRights14/03/23 12:59 AM
13

I would say 11% MEANS THEY'RE NOT TARGETING WOMEN JOURNALISTS YOU RUBES.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 11:52 PM
2

That's giving in.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 08:25 PM
43

to make it clear that there is still often inequality between men and women. You sure did that all right.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 02:37 PM
28

You know what you do? You sit your ass down, and when your teachers says something, you glare at em and say "make me".
/r/MensRights12/03/23 02:06 PM
8

Well consider that feminists need men to be misogynists to justify their continued existence.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 01:26 PM
4

The best way to stop discrimination on the basis of sex is... to.... stop discriminating on the basis of sex.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 11:42 PM
1

Happy to help.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 12:20 AM
-8

I wonder if that wasn't maybe factored in to the calculation. Because £180,000 for 25 years is actually pretty reasonable. It calculates out to £7,000/yr.
/r/MensRights08/03/23 01:19 AM
2

There are some things that some people do, that might be legitimately classified as toxic masculinity. However a good portion of masculine things have been deemed toxic arbitrarily. And when people start throwing around the term "Toxic Feminitity" and it becomes normalized, then I might consider looking into the idea of toxic masculinity a little deeper.
/r/MensRights04/03/23 12:41 AM
1

I'm veritably bursting at the seams with feelings I'd love to talk to someone nonjudgemental about, but to all outside observers, I'm pretty much Data.
/r/MensRights02/03/23 01:55 AM
3

My extremely autistic brother decided to grab a woman's boob once. He got in major hot water with everyone, including us. But we also understand that he did it because he doesn't understand social rules well at all. Is it not possible for both conditions to be true? That he gets in trouble for it, but we also understand?
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:28 PM
2

Because nobody looks at their cause critically. They may not even know that the outcomes have changed, and if they do, then they're just female supremacists.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 07:03 PM
7

What can can I do more for men? I guess, the best thing anyone can do, is speak up for men's rights whenever you see the opportunity, but do it so, that you don't get yourself kicked out of your social circles, one because I don't want that for you, and two, you can't do much good from being a wallflower.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 06:59 PM
1

Because that's always easy....
/r/MensRights25/02/23 06:45 PM
3

My niece is about 1/3 my size. She likes to play hit me a little too hard. Believe me, if fuckin' hurts. Nobody should be hitting anyone.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 06:44 PM
1

You know what I mean.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 05:50 PM
4

The banning of r/Mensrights is just around the corner everyone says, then the corner comes, and still here. It's like cold fusion, just around the corner, and it always will be.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 12:35 AM
6

I mean, we're not all Jesus, mistakes can be made.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 12:14 AM
2

What does being anti-racist entail?
/r/MensRights23/02/23 08:51 PM
5

"Racist". How the left cries wolf.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 08:50 PM
5

Providing scholarships and funding based on sex has absolutely nothing to do with what you are talking about. Oh no, you're right. That kinda shit needs to stop. Maybe if the vast majority weren't female only, I might think differently.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:32 AM
-3

I mean this is good on one hand to correct the imbalance. But I don't particularly care for the outcome that we can't sex specific organizations. I think we need them, there are some things men can't enjoy in the presence of women, and vice versa.
/r/MensRights23/02/23 12:01 AM
51

Think you meant to say "Financier".
/r/MensRights22/02/23 08:01 PM
8

I would like for people to stop assuming the worst possible interpretation/motivation of men's words or actions.
/r/MensRights21/02/23 01:34 AM
20

Talk about an overreaction, holy fuck.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:23 PM
2

My guess is, that the guy is somewhat attractive, and the women are getting mad because he's not paying them any attention.
/r/MensRights16/02/23 08:32 PM
2

I applied for rental assistance. Was told $300/month was unaffordable, so I was denied. I'm a white male, btw.
/r/MensRights15/02/23 01:35 AM
1

I don't swear when trying to flirt. In fact, I'm doing pretty well in that regard lately. My point is, is that it is a massive injustice to fire a man over a little flirting.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:45 PM
1

I think maybe we're getting confused on the level of flirtation. I get the feeling you think I'm saying something like "You tryna fuck?" When in reality, it's more of a "Hi". You don't pursue someone without knowing who they are. I unfortunately have lost out on some dates because the girl was gone before I got a chance to know her.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:34 PM
3

Yep. I have noticed it. My sister pulls this shit on me all the time. A thing I say is interpreted in the worst way that I didn't mean for it to be taken.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:28 PM
1

I was talking figuratively. If a workplace has a problem with you making an attempt to procure a date, then they have the right to ban that, but doing so is not the crime many people make it out to be.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:19 PM
1

Maybe not touching. But being fired for doing so, is a holy shit overreaction. It could very well ruin his life.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 10:18 PM
6

I completely disagree. Men have a right to make the attempt, shoot our shot. It only becomes harassment when you continue to try after she made it clear she had no interest.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 09:26 PM
4

There's playful sexism that both men and women engage in against each other. "Women, always cold, amirite?", "Lol, men always make a big deal about having a cold" This is something else. Men are lazy? Women don't care about disposing urine? Like are they trying to say men are squeamish? This isn't right.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 11:57 PM
1

Well, crap. Gonna have to rely on prison justice then.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 03:08 AM
2

Of course! I mean who'd fake a psychotic break as a ploy to get out of some jail time? It's just silly. He deserves execution.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:04 AM
2

I didn't say that. I was predicting that it would be said.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 02:02 AM
0

If you weren't one of the jurors, you don't have a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:48 AM
0

Note usage the phrase "stereotypical" stereotypes are bad, remember? I believe society's impression of Incels is horribly wrong. Maybe I should have bolded it?
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:43 AM
-6

This was an incredibly violent, and brutal murder of an innocent girl. And I hate to say this, but this guy looks like your stereotypical Incel (as the general public understands it.) And they'll be associating this with Men's Rights activism, manosphere influence. It needs to be made very clear, that we do not condone, or support this boy's actions in any way, may he be punished to fullest extent of the law. Which would be execution. Love Florida.
/r/MensRights07/02/23 01:13 AM
1

You are not allowed to gaze upon m'lady's visage.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 08:47 PM
1

$900 bucks a month to take care of your kid? Sounds about fair.
/r/MensRights04/02/23 01:38 AM
10

Then you're a moron.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 01:40 AM
12

There isn’t discrimination…there is a washroom for everyone And there is one that men can't use. I wonder what you would say if there was one women couldn't use. Or blacks. It's discrimination. can’t scream discrimination whenever you please… Of course you're right, but we are allowed to scream discrimination when it's actually there. And it is.
/r/MensRights03/02/23 12:33 AM
2

just as it would be for a woman I would say more so. How emasculating is that though?
/r/MensRights29/01/23 10:26 PM
3

it’s not fair to say that all men are horrible. It's not even fair to say most men are horrible.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 10:44 PM
5

No you didn't mess up. "Teach men not to rape", has the same bigoted spiritual energy as teach blacks not steal is racist. People being excessively bigoted need to be called out, and that's what that is.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 10:28 PM
4

He should have crossed the street. Why would any sane person humiliate themselves like that? Cross the street so I don't offend m'lady? You can fuck right off with that.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 01:48 AM
1

I'm not sure that liar applies to them. Crippling ignorance? Sure. They're so buried in their ideology, that they don't challenge a study that favors their position.
/r/MensRights12/01/23 02:26 AM
1

That's attempted murder right there. You don't just go hitting people in the head with bowling balls.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 11:17 PM
2

To attack marriage itself. We live in a time where there is not an insignificant size faction of people who think the world is overpopulated and something must be done about it. Our birthrates are plummeting because of what a particular group of people have done to relations between people. They have set black people against white people, women against men, gays vs straights, trans vs cis, married vs single.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 07:55 PM
-15

Meh, 23 likes isn't that bad.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:30 PM
2

The first thing you do is call the fucking cops. She destroyed your shit and HIT you. She needs to be in jail. Then, you break up with her. Stick your guns, she's gonna scream, and then cry, and maybe even threaten to kill herself. You don't need a person who acts like this in your life.
/r/MensRights05/01/23 10:27 PM
1

Women start shitting on men in front of me, they learn real fast that that shit is not ok.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 05:04 PM
2

That's heartening to hear.
/r/MensRights01/01/23 01:55 AM
1

I have an alternate opinion. Rates that are equal between the sexes is actually preferable. I also prefer to get there by reducing male suicide, so this rate increase for both sexes is pretty concerning.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:39 PM
11

It is a huge rise? I would say a 23% increase is cause for concern. 35% for women. Or are men's rights just complaining anytime a headline about an issue with women comes up? Surely you've hear of the social phenomenon whereby a news article says something like "Large asteroid on collision course with the planet, all life on earth will end, women most affected."? Obviously that's an exaggeration, but the phenomenon is there regardless. Anyway, while the sexist phenomenon continues to exist, we'l…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:36 PM
4

Actually, it's true: https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/suicide#part_10459 Ran the calcs. Male suicide rate increased by 23%, female rate by 35%. Regardless men still kill themselves at 3-4x the rate of women.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:28 PM
6

Of moderate interest, the suicide rate for black men has decreased.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 04:18 PM
11

Kidnappings are real. And rare. I asked a cop buddy of mine who spent 17 years on the force how many kidnappings he had to deal with. I was careful to specify legit kidnappings, not cases of a dad not returning his kids on time to their mother, and he said a grand total of ONE. It was prostitute who had been stabbed by a John.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 11:10 PM
8

I chose a different path. Instead of pretending to be something I'm not, I simply tried to actually be more attractive to women, and it seems to have worked.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:29 PM
8

you have literal pick up artists teaching men to mask their misogyny in order to fuck And how many men have actually consumed PUA material? you have men treating dating like a battleground Women have made it this way. Have you seen the 3 page long lists of virtues a man must have? Ever been on a date with a woman? It's like a police interview. Don't make any mistakes, or she's gone, regardless of what else you have going for you. Unless you're hot of course. and women are there to strategize to …
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:24 PM
12

They're the ones that chose to sleep with those men. They know full well that those men are assholes, and they choose to sleep with them anyway (or because of it) because those men are hot. Women like to have sex too, you know.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:05 PM
15

"Can't get pussy? Misogynist." Except, I know of ton of outright misogynists, who get laid like rockstars, so....
/r/MensRights23/12/22 01:52 PM
1

I will say this till I'm blue in the face: YOU CAN NOT MAKE SOMETHING A HUMAN RIGHT, THAT SOMEONE ELSE MUST LABOR TO PRODUCE.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 01:10 AM
3

Misandry and racism.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 01:58 PM
0

Positive masculinity, which is in far higher abundance.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:38 AM
0

Come on, guy wanted to look fucking mean, and you know it.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:21 AM
-2

Everything he did was a grossly exaggerated version of normal male behavior. Which is probably a combination of a very low IQ, and a MEGA dose of testosterone. Don't @ me, I'm a fan of testosterone, but like everything else in the world, it can become toxic in extremely high doses. Case in point.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:06 AM
1

because otherwise they would choose chastity. Gonna have to disagree with you on that one. We have a strip joint in my small town, and oddly, a lot of the girls that work there, do it to get laid. Women do enjoy sex, you know. And you just being in there gives you a little bit of bad boy cred.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 12:57 AM
1

Male sexuality is often seen as dirty, or evil. Have you ever heard someone say to woman "Oh, you just want sex"? Why should that be a shame? You're not taking anything from women (Assuming you don't get her pregnant), and you usually aren't harming them, so why should there be any shame to my sex drive? And like you said, bad boys don't care about the shame, they do what they want anyway.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 11:18 PM
1

How would he do that?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 10:22 PM
3

Good fucking grief. No shit assholes.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 04:21 AM
2

It's an old internet saying. Said jokingly, I don't actually think of women like that.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:06 PM
4

Yes. Not once did I blame women for this. I blamed society, so yeah, no misogyny, really.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 03:54 PM
6

Confidence doesn't happen in a vacuum. It usually comes from having some success. I have had some personal successes recently, regarding women. And my confidence is through the roof. Do you think nice guys would have a confidence problem, if they had enough women tell them they were cute or funny, the light arm touches, the look of hunger when they look at you... If they had had any of that, they would ooze confidence.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 01:27 AM
2

Well, why wouldn't he have status, being covered in bitches and all.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 01:18 AM
6

Except the POSes (I know them) that I see with not just a GF, but a smokin' hot one, kind of casts a shadow of doubt on your theory. Besides, I already acknowledged in my OP that I knew that there plenty of good women out there. Like I said, I just want to see a few less ner'do'wells with hot girls.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 01:11 AM
1

Not just a police officer, but by any white man.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 07:45 PM
4

You bet your bottom dollar it does. Here's a twofer for you, they're both women and black https://twitter.com/buzzfeeduk/status/601719259333414912?lang=en
/r/MensRights10/12/22 04:15 AM
3

You got it.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:07 AM
4

I out grumped them. That's why I won.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 02:03 AM
12

I mean, I commented that the actress that was playing the smokin' hot girlfriend of the protagonist of my favorite book series, wasn't very smokin' or hot. Of course some blue pill weirdo is gonna come out of the woodwork to defend m'lady. But, none of the people I was arguing with were women. I was arguing with a horde of white knights.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:39 AM
10

I mean, I made a comment on the attractiveness of a particular actress, it wasn't women I was arguing with....
/r/MensRights06/12/22 01:34 AM
11

We want equal rights, but it seems feminism has festered beyond that into female supremacy.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 08:54 PM
3

All I did when I was younger was try to overanalyze everything. It lead to analysis paralysis, I couldn't get anything accomplished because I never thought I was ready to try. This is where a little more testosterone would have helped me when I was younger, a little less rumination, and a little more do.
/r/MensRights05/12/22 01:32 AM
3

We say fuck him we're not seeing avatar now, not because of our testosterone, but because we know testosterone is good for us.
/r/MensRights04/12/22 09:54 PM
5

Get her order in writing with her signature on it before you do anything else. Then when you have to turn down a male candidate for that reason, slip him a note or something telling him why, maybe one of them will sue for discrimination. I'd tell you to, but you aren't actually the agrieved party, it's the candidates you've had to turn down, they're the ones with the standing. Obligatory NAL. I welcome correction from one if we have any here.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:36 PM
2

Excellent answer brother.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:52 AM
3

The vast majority of incels suffer in silence. And when I hear people use the word incel as a slur, I tend to get angry. I'm not incel myself, but I have a hard time understanding why anyone would make fun of such an unfortunate person. It seems wicked to me.
/r/MensRights02/12/22 12:51 AM
1

Better than you can imagine, I promise.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 08:43 PM
1

The opposite is that women hold a monopoly on bad behavior. I'll rephrase that. I don't want the opposite, I want neutral. I want neither men nor women to be regarded as having a monopoly on bad behavior. But why would sharing these stories in a group that already dislikes women make any difference? They aren't for the group members. They're for the everyone else. And no the group does not dislike women.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:33 PM
1

We think the opposite, and we want the world to as well. The point here isn't to tear women down, it's to stop tearing men down.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 07:24 PM
2

Yes. They show that men don't hold a monopoly on bad behavior.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:41 PM
4

Ghost her.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:20 AM
2

If you get all of your impressions about men from dating Kanye, then she's a fucking idiot.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 02:43 PM
3

Reminds me of a father-son duo of retards I know in my area. Both of them spend oodles of hours in the hospital over infected feet. Both of them have had to their foot removed to stop the infection. Anyways, turns out they did it to themselves, for disability, and because it makes you look more sympathetic when you're panhandling the off ramp to Apple Ave with a cardboard sign. No, really.
/r/MensRights23/11/22 05:47 AM
9

It's just raw bigotry. There's nothing wrong with appreciating the female form. But of course like anything there's going too far with it. If you stare for an incredibly long time, that's kinda creepy.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 04:15 PM
1

Fear doesn't care about likelihood. And my life shouldn't revolve around someone else's irrational fears. I'm sorry you fear men. But since your fears are overstated, it's not my problem. Stats also don't matter when you're the one dead or tied up in some psycho's basement. "Stats don't matter when when you have a steering column through your chest, so maybe we should ban Asians from driving." Do you see how that shit sounds? It's exactly what you're saying and it is bigoted AF. The vast, vast m…
/r/MensRights18/11/22 10:20 PM
6

Sounds like you have a revengeporn case.
/r/MensRights18/11/22 01:05 AM
11

"MEn doN't Have To worRY AbOUT BeINg murdERed liKe WoMen Do."
/r/MensRights17/11/22 04:42 PM
15

Based MRA bro. Tell your buddy to make sure he enjoys the fuck outta that money.
/r/MensRights16/11/22 06:16 PM
9

No they don't just make fun of hateful virgins. That's a lie. Ever been trying to woo a woman into bed and let her know you're a virgin? You can kiss that lay goodbye.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 08:14 PM
2

Yes, yes I have. And it's one the reasons why I loath them.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 08:13 PM
10

Feminism is the raging fire that must be put out.
/r/MensRights15/11/22 08:06 PM
1

Unless he was sentenced to death, this is a tragedy. And considering this hits home for me I find it a little cruel. I had friend die in police custody in a similar fashion, and he hadn't even been convicted of a crime yet. He was innocent, and they refused to give him his meds and he died from it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQsYCb7zLVA
/r/MensRights14/11/22 10:30 PM
3

That's what I thought. The likelihood of any man being a murderer is about as likely as Jessica Alba showing up at my house in lingerie wanting to bang my brains out.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 06:23 AM
3

I'm done here. I'm not going to sit here and have a tedious semantics debate with you. Good bye.
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:40 AM
2

Uh… Well, not screaming in fear at all times over it, but yes? The fact sexual assaults happen often, are dismissed in the way you just have, and they’re literally someone feeling like they are entitled to just grab and claw at your body if they want to- regardless of how you feel about it. I'm not dismissing it. What I am doing is challenging you on your deceptive/disingenuous argument techniques. No you don't have free reign to just grab at a woman, and if you do she has every right to slap yo…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:07 AM
2

Women absolutely terrified of having their but grabbed? There's a reason why you keep using weasel phrasing like "sexual violence" for your stat, because you know damn well 1/4 women aren't raped. Maybe 1/4 women have a had a bottom pinched, or a boob fondled groped (Changed to satisfy the pedantic asshole below). It doesn't explain the terror they go on about.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:26 PM
2

They are such a small percentage of the population, it's not worth worrying about. (Serial killers, or just murderers in general). Besides, serial killers kill men too.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:38 PM
1

Except when asked what their fear was with online dating, the overwhelming response was "Serial Killers". They didn't say sexual violence, you're still alive after "Sexual violence". No, they're afraid of serial killers. Which doesn't make sense, since serial killers are only a fraction, of a fraction, of a fraction, of a fraction of a percent of the male population. But it does make sense when you consider the stories they choose to consume are filled with serial killers.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 09:11 PM
3

Women are more likely to be victim of domestic abuse than men. This is just pure wrong. https://archive.ph/AlnIs
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:12 PM
3

Why?
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:11 PM
2

Who was saying they want to be murdered? Where did that come from. No they just like watching the stories, which leads them to starting to see their fictional serial killers in every man.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 08:10 PM
1

No shit.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 04:39 AM
3

Not mad at them for featuring women. Mad at them for targeting women. Also, what does it matter? We can walk and chew bubblegum at the same.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 11:01 PM
0

There is a silver lining. If they aren't targeting men with their advertisements, they can't browbeat them into taking a worthless degree. So there's that.
/r/MensRights03/11/22 10:59 PM
2

It's not true. It's also not, not true. Meaning they may have in one state, but we've got people all over the world as members on r/mensrights, so it's not exactly relevant.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:21 AM
1

We aren't talking about what a person is in relation to another. We're talking about people being perceived as property as someone else. Again, anyone just needs to take a trip through the last 100-150 years to see the evolution of outright "you belong to me" to a more subtle version of this. Again, you're being reductive. I was responding to the way you worded it. "On trans people in bathrooms “think of all the gross creepy men assaulting our women!”" is what you said. You were definitely tryin…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 11:00 PM
3

No argument here.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 08:12 PM
2

Generally speaking male attitudes towards women are that of ownership. On trans people in bathrooms “think of all the gross creepy men assaulting our women!” Are seriously kidding me? People express ownership of other people all the fucking time in multiple ways. My grandfather. Her husband. Their children. His employees. Come on man get real. On immigrants or other non-white races; “rapists coming for women” this one’s a paraphrase but the same attitude on full display. If the shoe fits: https:…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 07:39 PM
3

For example - many men who cause physical harm to women act as if they’re entitled to do so. That's how crime works. Most people will justify their crime in their minds somehow. "I beat her, because she nagged me", "I stole his car because he doesn't deserve it", "I murdered that guy, because he disrespected me"..... the patriarchal system did and it reinforced it. How the fuck is domestic violence "reinforced"? Any time anyone even gets a whiff of a man being violent with his woman, the torches…
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:08 PM
2

We're supposed to unite with the group that has done so much damage to men's lives? And has a very large contingent that actually hate men?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 04:00 PM
3

Yep. But what they don't say, is that every man fantasizes about being that guy that stops a rape from occurring and kicks the shit out of the attempted rapist.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:54 PM
4

Hot guys get women. Some of them are assholes and women are willing to ignore that because they're hot. There are hot nice guys too and they also get women.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:43 PM
2

The solution lies in egalitarianism. The current regime/society/system whatever you want to call it is anything but, in favor of women. Therefore, I say a move toward egalitarianism, is a move toward men's rights.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 03:41 PM
2

You've seen endless cases of men killing their dates? Really? Because I haven't.
/r/MensRights30/10/22 12:43 PM
3

IDK about civillian life, but women do perpetrate as much (Or more) domestic violence as men. https://archive.ph/AlnIs
/r/MensRights30/10/22 12:41 PM
3

Frankly the whole thing is idiotic. Why on this earth do straight women want to hang out in gay bars?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 12:34 PM
1

No, but the implication in the post was there. When there is a discrepancy in judicial treatment between men and women, there are 2 direct ways to solve it, either by punishing fewer men, or more women.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:31 PM
3

IDK, a lot of men are in prison for rape/murder/theft/assault. I gotta tell you, I'm not itching to repeal any of those.
/r/MensRights27/10/22 10:02 PM
9

Well, since the trend has been to screw over men, and coddle women, a pro human ruling is a pro-male ruling.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 10:12 PM
25

Wait, is Haley's comet passing over head? A pro-male ruling? In India?
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:07 PM
2

TBH, the thing I want the most is for the rampant misandry to go away. If you've already exorcised yours, then there really isn't anything else you need to do.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:47 PM
23

I believe OP is a woman.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 06:41 PM
3

You must know you don't speak for all women, right?
/r/MensRights24/10/22 01:51 PM
3

You may not have a choice. Men really do start looking far more attractive to women as a marriage prospect at around 40.
/r/MensRights22/10/22 03:01 PM
2

I see 20 year old chicks a lot of times, won't even look in the direction of a guy their age. This is really a nothingburger, hell I'd wager that half the complainers in the comments are silver fox chasers themselves.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 02:25 AM
1

Yes really. Why not?
/r/MensRights19/10/22 10:11 PM
2

Your only option is to go live in the wild.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 01:18 AM
2

www.thereligionofpeace.com
/r/MensRights17/10/22 10:28 PM
14

A lot them are. But you know those same chicks would melt in their panties if Hcav even looked in their direction, so...
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:22 PM
3

Mohamed's lieutenant, murdered a man, then raped his widow in his blood. Mohamed could have stopped the blood feud between the Suni and Shia, but never did anything about it before he died, and left two factions at each others throats for the next 1300 years. Mohamed married a 6 year old girl, but she was sick, so he couldn't consummate the marriage until she was 9, what a swell guy! And religious freedom? That's good one. He moved into a city where they had their own religions, tried to get the…
/r/MensRights16/10/22 05:06 PM
2

^ What he said.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 01:41 AM
45

Islamophobia is a real and legitimate feeling to have, considering the vile things their holy texts are filled with.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:22 PM
2

It just goes to show you, the bible is right, all people are assholes.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 10:01 PM
2

Man flirting with of age women? To the stocks with him!
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:35 PM
1

Doing the important work I see.
/r/MensRights14/10/22 10:29 PM
3

The answer is: that's bullshit. The law is enforced when they want to get rid of somebody but they don't have anything legitimate to fire/arrest them over.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 09:29 PM
6

You haven't been paying attention.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 08:12 PM
2

I've said this countless times. Your odds of meeting a serial killer are incredibly rare. My odds of meeting a fat woman, are incredibly likely.
/r/MensRights09/10/22 06:25 PM
2

Thinking is fine. Too much thinking brings around all kinds of wild stupid crazy crap. Communism, and men can get pregnant kind of crazy crap.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:34 PM
3

That's right. Tax men more so their families can suffer more. FFS.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 11:32 PM
2

No, if he's paying child support and they mutually agreed he would not be in the children's lives, then that's fine.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 09:32 PM
4

There are actual deadbeat dads out there, but the label is applied to far, far too many men, and oxymoronically (or just moronically) to men trying to be in their kids lives and support them.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 08:42 PM
3

Sue your fucking lawyer for malpractice. Also, should've known this was Canada. Seriously, men who still live in Canada, why?
/r/MensRights06/10/22 07:55 PM
4

The other thing about masculine energy is that men can cash the checks they write. IE they have the physical strength to back it up, women don't.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 07:24 PM
3

Wait, men who hate women hate women they're taking control of their own lives? It couldn't possibly be that every woman he dated has cheated on him. It couldn't possibly be that every woman he dated has made his life a living hell by starting knock down drag out fights over nothing all the time. It couldn't possibly be that his ex-wife falsely accused of abuse and molesting the kids, and got alimony, child support, and full custody so he can't see his kids. No none of that.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:34 PM
47

Because it's raw nonsense. Nobody consciously or otherwise acts incompetently on purpose. Being considered incompetent is fucking humiliating. Who the fuck would do that?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:29 AM
5

Here's an interesting thought. Would it be possible to sue the child's bio dad for the child support you have to pay? Any lawyers in here got an opinion?
/r/MensRights02/10/22 01:04 AM
31

But you take it to the point of absurdity. The man is turning the weapon in, is he really a threat to society? Does he really deserve 5 years in jail?
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:48 PM
86

Hindsight is 20/20 eh? The poor guy was under the false impression that his government was there to help him. But it wasn't the police that ultimately did him in, it was judge who actually sentenced him to 5 years.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:40 PM
11

Yeah, it's a pretty old story, and I'm having trouble finding it.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:37 PM
161

Your police in the UK just suck in general. There was a story a while ago about a man who found a shotgun in his garden, decided to do the right thing and turn it into the police there, only for them to arrest him for being possession of a deadly weapon.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 03:18 PM
1

It's unquantifiable.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:21 AM
3

Feminism has a case in Iran.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 12:22 AM
2

It's really not that complex. As men we are constantly judged for being single. It's used in slurs against our character and credibility. Single women on the other hand are encouraged, "You go girl", "I need a man like a fish needs a bicycle", etc. For men being single is a scarlet letter, for women a badge of honor. It's no wonder men hate it and women enjoy it.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 10:59 PM
7

how does such preposterous law continue to exist? It's called gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights22/09/22 12:03 AM
1

Don't wear the title on your sleeve. Just advocate for men's rights when with tact when the topics come up.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 06:11 AM
1

Of course it's unfair. And it's totally up to you whether or not you decide to play ball. Just know your job and livelihood are on the line. And who knows if you fake it, you might end actually enjoying it.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 04:31 PM
-3

You'll also note I addressed that in my OP. I said it may not be fair or right. But, it is what it is. It's something we have to live with.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:46 AM
-13

I can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. Meaning I can do both.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 09:00 PM
4

Fuck treading lightly around these people. Talk how you want to talk, if they get offended at something you said, just laugh, shake your head and walk away.
/r/MensRights13/09/22 08:30 PM
-16

That's the whole problem though. Not saying it's fair or right, but people who keep to themselves tend to creep other people out. It was the keeping to yourself that got you targeted, sorry to say. Just learn how to have small talk, "How was your weekend?", "How's the dog?", "You get the jet ski you've been wanting yet?
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:47 PM
5

Men's rights to what in relation to being effeminate? Right now there's no law against it. Are you looking for societal acceptance? In which case no, it's pretty weird.
/r/MensRights11/09/22 02:27 PM
3

It's anecdotal. They also seem to use it like we don't also have lived experiences.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 04:01 PM
9

There's a reason the law enforcement profession is male dominated.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 01:27 AM
1

I've got my ducks in a row, and I'm pretty sure I've done enough research that I'll be prepared to handle most situations that occur.
/r/MensRights08/09/22 08:17 PM
1

I'm not a small guy, short, but strong and there aren't too many guys who I find intimidating. But that's a poor gauge on whether or not someone is a threat. Someone's 90 yr grandmother using her walker may not be intimidating to even a yorkie, but if she's packing a .38 she can kill you. Multiple beligerent men on the other hand, who may or may not be hiding knives somewhere on em are a threat, whether they're MMA fighters, or one of Michael Cera's characters.
/r/MensRights07/09/22 07:55 PM
1

Let me give some examples: 1. You are attacked by a man who is roughly the same size as you. He is not using any weapons. If you shoot him, you will spend the rest of your life in prison. Unarmed, doesn't mean unlethal. And that's even more true the more unarmed assailants I have. Besides, if he gets close enough to me he can attempt to take my gun from me. You want to not get shot? Don't run at me shouting invective, and being nasty. You are attacked by the same man. He comes at you with a base…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:06 PM
3

This shit needs to stop now, otherwise it's only going to get worse. What message about men do you think that kid is receiving when his/her mother is berating and talking down to a man like that?
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:55 PM
5

The gun isn't for the women, it's for her white knights who are seeking to avenge m'lady. Or in other words, with multiple men shouting profanities and running at me, I'm shooting.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:14 PM
9

The gun is for the white knights, and if they're attacking you, you have every right (legal included) to shoot, to stop the attack.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 03:48 PM
5

Complaints of racism in an intersectional feminist space?
/r/MensRights05/09/22 04:16 AM
1

Ah yes, the church of diversity.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 01:07 AM
2

Anecdotally, this tracks. I was molested, one time.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 10:56 PM
-1

Your homosexuality may be a primal affront to them. You've taken yourself out of their dating pool.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:58 PM
25

I've seen this a couple times, and they always get shredded in the comments.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 12:32 AM
1

And he still might. He never said he was against the idea. He just didn't sign it this time around for who knows what reason. Regardless, given a bill worded correctly he'd be willing to sign.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:36 PM
-2

He said it was because he thought it would invalidate alimony judgements already in place. A lame reason, but it does indicate it is still on the table with the right construction.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 09:34 PM
3

I hate astrology because it means nothing. The date of your birth and the constellation it signifies have no bearing on your personality or what happens to you in your life. Besides who decided what birthdates the constellations match up to anyways? And what was their reasoning?
/r/MensRights22/08/22 08:22 PM
10

Realize why they are doing it. They don't actually give 2 fucks if you fuck or not, the label is meant to hurt you, not convince you of anything. Best way to respond is "If all you have left in your arsenal is juvenile insults, it's clear that I've won, good day."
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:25 PM
2

https://youtu.be/rksKvZoUCPQ?t=675
/r/MensRights20/08/22 08:21 PM
5

Partiarchy suggests some conspiracy taking place. Gynocentrism is simply an observation of people's behavior toward women.
/r/MensRights16/08/22 01:33 AM
1

The fuck are you talking about? Mute myself? Why?
/r/MensRights13/08/22 11:25 PM
5

Along with investigated by every law enforcement agency with jurisdiction.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:30 PM
1

This is exactly why when people ask other people if they are attractive or not, I recommend they tell the unvarnished truth, but without being mean about. Knowing for certain that you're unattractive can be incredibly freeing.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 11:07 PM
5

They don't care whether or not you get laid, it's the argument tactic of a desperate opponent. They use it because they think it will hurt you, not because they think it will convince you. Best way to respond is to figure out what their anxiety is and stick your salt covered finger, right into that wound.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 09:49 PM
4

And less and less people will be in them because of this classist shit, and the money you can earn doing them will skyrocket.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:23 PM
11

Fix your own goddamned sink, little girl. But I'll also take solace in the fact that I know she paid out the fucking nose for the "little man" to fix her sink. Beating the patriarchy indeed.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 10:20 PM
29

Once a week is actually pretty reasonable.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 02:04 PM
46

I've encountered this argument before, it usually winds it's way around to, well "white men can't experience racism, but you can be prejudiced against them" which makes no fucking logical sense, like that's somehow better? No the argument is simply one of convenience they recognize that racism is awful, so this argument allows them to be all the things racists are, without having the label applied to them.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:25 PM
1

Because we're secure in our cause. We're not threatened by opposing opinions as they're easily debunked.
/r/MensRights29/07/22 12:19 AM
1

Why doesn't he want a son is the real question. Is it because boys are bad, or is there some other reason?
/r/MensRights23/07/22 12:59 AM
6

I wouldn't get too worked up about this. If you're not really having trouble with wait times to use the toilet, I wouldn't kick up too much of a fuss. However, if you're having an episode and need to use a commode right now, do not hesitate to use the women's restroom, or a nearby trash can, stink the place up, maybe they'll consider swapping some of those rooms then.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 11:13 PM
1

He's hilarious.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 11:13 PM
3

Falling Down, American Beauty.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 03:37 AM
1

It's a simple revenge fantasy. They read about things done to other women in the past and feel somebody should pay. Doesn't matter that the people who committed the crime are long dead, she needs someone to pay now. It's selfish, vindictive, and evil.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:27 PM
2

the government would conscript them to give birth whenever it needed more tax payers slaves. FTFY.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 10:25 PM
1

Northern Bros, this is not your battle. You've got far bigger fish to fry. Starting with radical misandry permeating your judicial system.
/r/MensRights16/07/22 02:42 AM
1

Not against it.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:38 AM
2

I mean you could look to NC and their governors race for evidence and how they gerrymandered their districts Why would I do that? Both sides gerrymander like it's going out of style. I don't like it. But it kind of goes with winning the majority of a legislature. The only real question of bad faith is whether or not the maps provided were gerrymandered by racial lines. If there's any proof that they were doing it, I'd like to see it. Besides it would be incredibly counter-productive to your camp…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:59 AM
4

It's what SCOTUS is going to rule in favor of in October and it's going to give unchecked power to state lawmakers on how they conduct federal elections This is a complicated case and I need to read and digest it more to make a response, except to say that wouldn't this apply in both red and blue states? It's going to be how the GOP steals the 2024 Presidential Election. They'll reject ballots and send their own electors to vote red no matter what The People say And you have evidence that this i…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 12:14 AM
9

This is exactly the point. While they punish their poor husbands who had nothing to do with the ruling, they are also pro-creating less, contrast that with the mormons who are having 10-13 kids... The conservatives will take complete power in a generation or two.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:11 PM
2

What are you talking about?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:06 PM
2

So some women will start producing less mouths for the welfare state to feed, and this is somehow supposed to make me rise up against the ruling?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:05 PM
1

I know it's unlikely. I don't agree that it's impossible.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:03 PM
1

I don't know anything of the sort. I do know it will be very difficult to get a jury to believe a man can be trafficked by a woman, but it's not impossible.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 10:14 PM
4

I love when people respond to posts here all snarky with information that has been debunked a thousand times, resurrected, then debunked again a thousand times. Yes. There is an earnings gap. The average earnings of all men is about 22% more than average earnings of all women. This does not factor in, hours worked, job title, or experience. You're comparing the salaries of engineers to that of secretaries and going "This isn't fair!"
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:22 AM
1

Even in the service sector jobs? Hard to pay less than minimum wage.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:10 AM
1

Did you read the whole post? Or are you just here to push your feminist lies? There was no salary difference, it was the exact same resume, only a female name on it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:09 AM
2

I already responded to this earlier but another thought crossed my mind. You wonder how this would go down had it been a man on the other side? Well, this is the same county that tried everything under the sun to try and convict Kyle Rittenhouse even though they had video clearly showing him innocent.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 10:29 PM
2

Yes. He would, if he can prove that he had been trafficked by her.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 10:27 PM
1

Her case wasn't proved yet. The only thing the Wisconsin SC decided was that she was allowed to try that defense.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 06:01 PM
2

There's another angle too. What if some actual murderers get let go because people are willing to accept sparse evidence that the victim was a sex trafficker?
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:59 PM
1

Well, yeah, the ruling didn't specify that she wasn't guilty, only that she could use the affirmative defense for murder, it's up to a lower court judge/jury whether they buy it.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:56 PM
2

I knew for the last 2 years about this data, and I still support her. Yes what she did was murder. But then I think murdering a sex trafficker is justified, especially your own sex trafficker.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:37 PM
1

Yes, I knew this since for last couple of years. Yes it technically was murder, but then to me murdering a sex trafficker is justified. Even more so your own sex trafficker.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 05:35 PM
1

The vast majority of alleged "sex trafficking" is some form of adult prostitution. I don't disagree, but you'd have to agree that a legit victim of sex trafficking should have a little bit of latitude when it comes to defending herself. But every bad law and bad precedent has a sympathetic victim at its head. If this is applied indiscriminately to "sex trafficking" cases, we already have a long history of extending that to adult prostitution. It's murder. The courts tend to take that a little mo…
/r/MensRights09/07/22 12:19 AM
4

Well technically, if before you had zero cases, and now 2, they are indeed becoming more common.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:58 PM
-3

TBF, if you're not a banking exec, lawyer, doctor, etc and you're running around in a trenchcoat that's pretty strange.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:57 PM
0

I'm interested to see your thought path that brought you to this idiotic conclusion.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 10:48 PM
17

Not men's rights related, unless you're suggesting men have the right to rape young girls repeatedly and force them to do porn without consequence, in which case GTFO of here, we don't want you here.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:10 PM
4

You're right this has nothing to do with Men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:08 PM
2

You're right, and I've been aware of this case and on the side of the girl the whole time. And I am ecstatic at this outcome.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:07 PM
1

Being a parent is the worst thing tbh and no one should be forced into it if they don’t want it. Being a parent is the worst thing tbh First off I take issue with this. It can be the worst thing, or it can be the best thing. The situations are highly variable. no one should be forced into it if they don’t want it. So that leaves us with a choice, either we let the children starve, or the government taxes us so they can feed the abandoned children. I'm not a big fan of either option, so I propose…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 08:03 PM
3

I recognize that, but he just looks like another dude to me, so my headcannon says he's white, and this DA probably sees it the same way. It's another indication of a phenomenon I've seen from the left. Latinos, Asians, and Jews seem to have their race changed based on the particular narrative that is trying to be pushed. Need to show how diverse you are? All the people in your business/group/club all have the correct race assigned to them. Need to try and push the narrative of white on black ra…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:55 PM
4

I don't know how much time you get out in the world, but here's a little nugget for you, black people, and Latino people hate each other.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:34 PM
11

This thing is an absolute travesty. This DA is a piece of shit who lets actual criminals run free while bringing the hammer down on this man who dared to defend himself. And yes, letting the woman go without any charges is certainly a problem here, but there's an elephant in the room. This was a white man, who killed a black man and this DA is a liberal black man.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:26 PM
1

I'm not particularly interested in footing the bill for someone else's children. Of which he seems to have multiple. Kids are expensive, being leftover with $700 on $16/hr is actually somewhat decent. The big takeaway here, though his life would be more bearable for him, if he could live in the house he's paying for with his children.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:37 AM
-3

Even with a more severe case of promiscuity, there could be one guy she's repulsed by, or she could be going through something and is not interested in sex atm, and end up getting raped. I'm not sure any amount of promiscuity on the woman's part is a mitigating factor in the prosecution of a rape. If she said no, and he went ahead anyways, that's rape. But I suppose it could be used as evidence that she likely didn't say no... you'd have to be very careful about how you play that...
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:51 PM
41

There are things women can say in their private communications that can be relevant to the current charges. Like if they have a history of falsely accusing men, and those communications can show that, that can be very relevant to the current case.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:24 PM
1

That's fair, and I agree, if a man tries to rape you, you should put 2 in his head for sure.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:11 PM
8

"That tries anything with you" what, like ask for date? Seduce you? What does this mean?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:59 PM
19

and that men get custody most of the time. They said that? Really? Because that's hilariously false.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:34 PM
1

Which is why I said, "But I take your point".
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:10 AM
23

Great. I get to pay to support children whose mother I didn't get to sleep with.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 11:03 PM
5

Well, it's physically impossible to give a woman a vasectomy, but I take your point.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:42 PM
3

It's a bit like jokingly pointing a loaded gun at your friend. You may have absolutely no intention of killing your friend, but you're also a gigantic idiot.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:39 PM
2

You guys do realize this is just another stunt to try and make some idiotic point about abortion/the demise of Roe V Wade right?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:35 PM
21

"To the funny farm, where life is beautiful every day." No I'm not crazy, it's line from a song.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:58 PM
2

This is very similar to the other phenomenon that this ruling will expose: On June 24th, 2022 every leftist everywhere, suddenly and inexplicably forgot what precedent means, scientists baffled.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:50 AM
2

I don't know if I agree or not. I'd have to see your logic behind this opinion.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:09 PM
0

Big brain plays. Not in your case, apparently, since he never said "women" he said "women who said 'no uterus, no opinion'".
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:05 PM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about here. He didn't say "women can go shove it" he said "women who said 'no uterus, no opinion' can go shove it". BTW, "no uterus, no opinion" was incredibly offensive before the latest SCOTUS ruling.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 09:03 PM
1

Well, no shit. But then that isn't the point of them talking about it. They don't actually believe in mandatory vasectomies, they're just trying to make some idiotic statement about controlling women's bodies or some such.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:54 PM
4

You're a lunatic. How the fuck do you get from "minding his own business" to "Beating the fuck out of her"?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 11:18 PM
3

It does no such thing.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:55 PM
3

That's not minding his own business. Also, who wouldn't call the cops on someone who is beating the fuck out of someone else?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:37 PM
2

You'll call the cops on a man minding his own business?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:13 PM
2

In any other case that distinction would not be present. "It" only becomes only a fetus when you want to murder it.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:59 PM
1

Nice.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:12 PM
1

Apparently the human rights of the unborn infant don't apply here...
/r/MensRights24/06/22 08:11 PM
2

That would be a case of lies in television, real women who have to pay alimony are furious beyond belief about it.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:14 AM
2

Because Misogyny is already a hate crime, making misandry one as well would just balance the scales.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 01:10 AM
8

Realize that your spouse is not a representative of men. We still have to have due process. You do realize how absurd a notion it is that you can't live in a house that you own? If you're going to commit that crime against a person, you'd better be sure they deserve it.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:52 AM
5

I kind of think an enjoyable experience would be one where I do my thing, and you do your thing, but in the same house. I don't expect you to want to watch my sci-fi with me, and I would hope you don't expect me to get into dancing with the stars, if there's something we both like, then great, we can do it together.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:46 AM
4

This isn't so much to point out a systemic flaw in the justice system, but shut down feminist claptrap about how rape and pedophilia is accepted. If it was accepted, this clerical error wouldn't have caused his whole fucking social circle to come down on him like a bag of hammers. "Oh, pedophilia? That's all? Lol, here lemme buy you a drink..." Give me a break feminists.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:17 AM
1

It is the Babylon Bee, a well know Christian satire site. Hell, the name of the site Babylon Bee, should have clued you in.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 11:44 PM
1

I have a hard time accepting any of these 20 years after the fact allegations.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:27 PM
8

"Not like the other men"-ing himself. He's a MUSer. Mus: Male Unicorn Syndrome. Just remember, "All men are sexist, raping, selfish pigs." Except for him, of course, he's the unicorn, the only good one.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 05:45 PM
2

Ooh, that's an interesting take. So since men tend to abuse alcohol and drugs more often than women, do we get to use her logic and say that there's actually more sexism against men?
/r/MensRights18/06/22 10:52 PM
0

Are we sure this book isn't satire?
/r/MensRights17/06/22 03:39 AM
3

Right back acha pal.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 12:17 AM
2

Good grief, the Indian legal code needs a serious re-work.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 11:17 PM
1

Good grief asshole. Nobody is dodging anything. I simply think that intentionally causing the death of an innocent is murder. Yes there are problems and complications that come from outlawing it. Just like there was with slavery, and just like slavery, it's such a horrible institution, that you ban it first, then work through the problems afterward. Yes, there should be exceptions in case the mother will die. And if there are places where doctors are refusing to care for women having a miscarria…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 07:36 PM
0

And life threatening complications can happen long after any definition of 'fetal heartbeat' Arguing with you is like arguing with a toddler. The law allows both, but both conditions do not have to be met. If life threatening complications come up after a heartbeat is detected, you're still allowed to take extraordinary steps to save the mother's life
/r/MensRights12/06/22 06:51 PM
1

that those doctors can be sued into the gutter under those state's laws, so thank you for being so dishonest and evasive like your type ALWAYS is. Talk about ignorance. Abortions are allowed up until a fetal heartbeat is detected, or in the case of medical emergencies. Ectopic pregnancies and miscarriages are certainly emergencies. superior knowledge like myself. Lol. Ok. So, now you have to choose between saying that accidentally causing the death of another human being isn't manslaughter, OR, …
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:27 AM
1

You and those like you are already causing doctors to turn away miscarrying women Then that's on those doctors. Especially since abortion is currently legal, why should they have any problems there? I bet you're SO ignorant you don't know ~70% of fertilized eggs don't implant and thus you must think that's manslaughter, or you're a hypocrite and you don't. Why the fuck would I think a fertilized egg that doesn't implant would be manslaughter? What do I think the woman somehow has conscious contr…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 03:44 AM
1

Only willful ignorance of biology allows one to continue to be pro-birth, which is really what that position is. The hell it is. If that were the case, we'd looking for laws that penalize women for not getting pregnant. We just think abortion is murder.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:39 AM
1

That tells me you actually don't. If you really understood them, you'd still be one.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:58 AM
1

I personally never considered this. I was against abortion because I view it as murder. Full stop.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:13 AM
1

they automatically go to hell if they aren’t properly born and saved. What does that have to do with the morality of abortion?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:02 AM
1

Perhaps you don't understand pro-lifers.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:58 PM
1

Do you have to be christian to be against the murder of children?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:56 PM
4

Abortion really is not a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 11:55 PM
3

On defending yourself from a woman, I will do what I gotta do. If a crowd of white knights decide they want to defend m'lady's honor, they'll have to get past my legally carried .380 pistol first.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 12:06 AM
7

I'm sorry, is this supposed to help end misogyny? Because all it seems to do is make women look like murderers. Though I will challenge her assertion that the murders of husbands have dropped. What data is she basing this on?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:50 AM
4

Who is this person, and why do any of us here give two flying fucks about what she has to say?
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:14 AM
3

(if I'm thinking of the right person) You are.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:59 PM
3

Even if she was opposed to BLM? Suppose it was Candace Owens out there with the rifle instead of Kyle.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:47 PM
5

I suppose an interesting case study would be to see how the media would react to a black woman doing the exact same thing. IE standing against BLM thugs, and defending herself.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 11:33 PM
4

I never did subscribe to her, and I will never watch another one of her videos.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:45 PM
10

Rittenhouse isn't related to mens rights. You're right on this part. But here's the kicker. I can support men's rights, and I can support Rittenhouse. I don't support Rittenhouse for the MRA angle. I support him for the self-defense angle, which I may even support more strongly than men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 10:44 PM
1

But it's also unfair that my parents paid my tuition, and you (and so many others) had to take out loans. Why would that be unfair? Did your parents not earn their money?
/r/MensRights05/06/22 03:23 AM
1

You assume everyone was just irresponsible No I don't. I just find it incredibly unfair that other people can get their loans forgiven, while I still paid mine, it's pretty insulting.
/r/MensRights05/06/22 02:31 AM
2

I have mixed emotions about this, because if women are legally allowed to sleep with their boss for promotions, then they won't be managers because of their managerial capability, they'll be managers because they spread their legs. And if you think people don't listen to em' now because they're women, wait until they know that's how they got the position. Nobody will do anything they ask, and the organization will fall apart.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:32 PM
1

Lets go ahead and bail out people who were irresponsible with their career and school choices, and fuck everyone else who paid off their loans. Do I get my 25K back too?
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:26 PM
1

Says the person who didn't pay off their students loans and watch other people have theirs wiped.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:24 PM
2

I don't even GAF if it does mostly help women. It could go to all men and I would still be royally pissed off. Do I get my $25k back from paying off my student loans? Let's go Brandon Fuck Joe Biden, and the democrats.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 11:23 PM
1

They get divorced for all kinds of other stupid/selfish reasons, why should cancer be off limits? Maybe they felt like their husband was doing enough to support them, or maybe they somehow blame him for it. Who knows? But what I did see throughout the report, was weasel phrasing like: "more likely to be separated or divorced soon" It doesn't say "Abandoned" "Left" or "the more likely her partnership would end." not "The more likely her husband would seek divorce". None of the data suggested that…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 09:48 PM
6

This doesn't say anything about who initiated the divorce. Realize, women are the initiators of the divorce the majority of the time, and it puts your little study in perspective.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 02:02 AM
3

A problem that the rest of us are somehow responsible for?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 11:19 PM
7

Point remains. The vast majority of men do not commit these crimes, so any time feminists want to start shaming the rest of men for them, well they can get called out as bigots for it.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 03:02 PM
7

Except that we do actually say "Not all men" and rightfully so. When Sarah Everard was murdered. One woman was murdered. Feminists in England wasted no time in demanding curfews for men. Based on the murder of one woman. You'll hear women say something like "Women are getting murdered!" So yes, "not all men" is an appropriate, if lackluster response. I posted a thread here a while ago asking for ideas for a response with more power behind it because "not all men" suggests there may be a signific…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 11:23 PM
4

IDK, I like to be a little dominant myself, and I spent about 2 minutes there and I'm done for life. That place is extreme.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 04:36 AM
2

No feminists didn't invent the term "incel", they just pumped a whole bunch of extra meaning into it. We all know by now that incel is a big tent term, it can include anything from "No women will sleep with me" to "I've had my dick cut off, therefore as much as I would like to have sex, I am physically incapable".
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 04:29 AM
1

If male lives were more value, why we allowed to slaughter men en masse in video games, and nobody blinks an eye?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 04:24 AM
1

Your mistake was not dropping the info anonymously.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 04:18 AM
3

y'all forgot you've always been able to vote. You're not 130 years old are you? In which case, so have you. Is your movement about getting revenge for wrongs done to other women in the past? Because that's a pretty shitty basis for one. And petty AF.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 04:13 AM
0

Was this woman so in the moment, that she couldn't tell that the "man" she opened her legs for wasn't really a man? What'd she do, close her eyes, spread her legs, and say "go to town stud"?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:01 PM
2

What the heck are "MaGes?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 04:46 PM
3

I've done that at my job. Because the people who run my shop are a bunch of assholes, so who cares. But to my SO? Not a chance.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 12:58 AM
2

I will say this there should be a reasonable minimum child support paid, based off of what is reasonably required to raise your child in a decent home in a decent neighborhood, with decent food, decent clothing, decent medical attention, and some recreation. After that it should be a reasonable percentage of your income, say 20% per child with enough left over for you to live a decent life. But aside from that, these judges "imputing" income that you "should" be earning is a crock of shit, and n…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 05:56 PM
-3

America bitches are trying to make women have babies Nobody is trying to "make" women have babies. We just don't want you to murder them. They bring on the pregnancies themselves. and at the same time keep men from making them. No, we aren't. This is just some idiotic democrat trying to make a snarky point about abortions, without any understanding of the opposing side's position on the matter.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:52 PM
1

Another democrat making a stupid point about abortion by comparing apples to oranges.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:49 PM
5

He predicted someone would try to kill him.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 08:14 PM
125

I'd file this one under "progress'. For once the police were awesome.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 10:57 PM
2

Again, I believe you, but to convince someone else who might be on the fence, when you make your claims you need to provide some sort of evidence. A study, video, testimonials from laymen and professionals, etc
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:58 PM
2

Not that I disagree, but I how would you back up statements 2, 4, 5, and six? What evidence would you present?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 03:03 AM
9

Comments turned off, naturally.
/r/MensRights11/05/22 01:17 AM
12

Well, let's just analyze this phenomenon. Pro-lifers have been out there preaching abstinence, and the respond to Roe being overturned... with abstinence. It's like a circular firing squad giving your enemy exactly what they wanted.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 01:19 AM
1

That was implied.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 08:32 PM
1

What are organized feminism spending all it's money on? Lobbying our government to pay for abortions in Africa. Because making sure WOC can kill their offspring is very important to them.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:43 AM
2

But they are very on top of making sure we pay for abortions in 3rd world countries. Gotta make sure those undesirables stop pro-creating amirite ladies?
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:42 AM
1

Best way to handle these situations is to just roll your eyes, and if you wanted to keep throwing darts, then fuckin' keep throwing darts. By stopping you gave credence to idea.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 12:34 AM
2

How should I elaborate it? I was never in real support of financial abortion. It was more of an "eye for an eye" thing. If women have a "get out of jail free card" then men should too. They no longer have that, so the 1 justification I had in my mind for financial abortion has gone poof.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:53 AM
1

its not fair to subject the uninterested father to 18 years of parental responsibility It's not fair to the rest of us to make us support a child that is not ours. I'm not a prude, but if you want the fun, you have to take responsibility for the consequences.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:11 AM
1

Well since access to traditional abortion is no longer guaranteed for women, I no longer support financial abortion. You squirted the kid into her belly, don't make the rest of us pay for it.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:07 AM
2

You can't extrapolate your personal experiences to the whole world. Ask anyone outside your community and they'll tell you without question women prefer tall men. As a shortish man, I don't hold it against them, it's in their nature. I have to live in the world I've got, and not the one I wish I had. What I do hold against them, is when they feel it necessary to put us down/make fun of us over an immutable feature of our biology.
/r/MensRights02/05/22 04:07 AM
2

Yes, it is: https://www.businessinsider.com/height-difference-in-couples-what-is-best-2018-4
/r/MensRights02/05/22 03:03 AM
25

Thank fuck I don't have kids and an ex. With my situation, my income is based on working 8 hours of overtime and more every goddamned week. So to even maintain my income I would have to continue working OT every week for 18 years. Never minding I get some female-chauvinist judge to impute me a higher income.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 10:48 PM
4

Stealing a mobile phone is not even a 3 1/2 year worthy sentence much less 10 years. And what the hell is this license crap? What he's now a permanent ward of the state because he stole a phone? All this crap needs to be cut out, this licensing, and therapy, and anger management classes and whatever they put these guys through, and just go back to flogging. 10 strokes with a leather wrapped stick, on the back, from a person qualified to do this, and end it. No record, no parole boards, no callin…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:15 PM
3

Who's assertion. It's a stupid one. Sitting down to pee is a messy proposition, our pee vector isn't the same as women's.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 11:38 PM
6

TIL men can't be genuine refugees.
/r/MensRights16/04/22 06:33 PM
5

The real question is why is male flirting being negativized? How else are we supposed to find companionship? Just say no and move on, no need to turn the guy into a monster because he had the audacity to flirt with m'lady.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 10:19 PM
2

Then I would suggest finding an adult willing to help you navigate the school/legal system.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 08:29 PM
6

IDK if that counts as pedophilia. Could be. Just don't know. But what it really stinks of, is sexism, with the meter maxed out. Imagine making only the black students in class change in front of the teacher who was filming them "because she didn't trust them". See how fucked up that sounds? It's no less so because the subject is boys instead of black people.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 08:27 PM
2

Oh no! Anna Nicole Smith might not be able to marry some 90 year old geezer billionaire who can't even get out of his chair, much less get it up and then have the easy life when he passes 2 days later! The horror!
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:19 AM
6

Did nobody else notice that ending permanent alimony is also on the governor's desk? Is it possible to get 2 huge wins for Men's Rights in the same year? https://floridapolitics.com/archives/506391-fundamentally-unfair-legislature-approves-bill-ending-permanent-alimony/
/r/MensRights10/04/22 03:48 AM
1

I think we're more interested in our women having our backs, but if it's a battle we can win, we prefer to do it ourselves. Likewise, I'm pretty sure women would prefer to handle their confrontations themselves whenever possible.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:24 AM
3

Sounds like one of those made up titles to puff people up. In my late teenage years when I had a job at McDonalds, they hired someone who's only job was to clean and stock the lobby, and they called him the "Lobby Manager".
/r/MensRights09/04/22 11:16 PM
3

Yet one more reason to continue to not watch football.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 11:15 PM
1

for a much lesser crime. Or no crime at all. His case was an overzealous prosecutor building his name. Nailing a pedophile is a pretty powerful thing to put on your resume.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:46 PM
1

I'm sorry, but no. Your histrionics are not warranted. The whole term "Statutory rape" is incredibly misleading. It's not rape if it happens to a boy, and it's not rape when it happens to a girl. It's the double standard that is the problem.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:45 PM
2

A friend of mine is dead because his minor Ex-GF sent him an inappropriate photo (Which he never opened) apparently having an explicit picture of a minor is a worse crime than actually having sex with a minor, as the age of consent is 16, and she was 17. They sent an entire police squad to his house, confiscated all of his electronic equipment, and then threw him in jail. While he was in there, the criminal jail nurses neglected to give him his medications and he died.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:11 PM
3

This is UK, but same difference.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:06 PM
2

What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Had the roles been reversed, had this been an attractive male teacher sleeping with a 15 year old female student, you know very well that all the talking heads and feminists would have been calling for his head.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:06 PM
2

"Attractive woman getting off easy for statutory rape of minor boy" isn't exactly newsworthy.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 11:05 PM
3

Right because women apparently get nothing from ICE technology.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:13 AM
2

Yeah. Ok. Expecting people to not assume the absolute worst intentions for everything you do is Narcissism? Where did you get your Psychology degree? Montana U? 'fuck out of here.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:21 AM
5

Only a psychopath sexist would regard expecting neutral behavior from women as "expecting them to fawn over you". I just don't want to be shamed 6 ways from Sunday for being born a man, is that too much to ask?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:17 AM
7

On the contrary. I love women, which is why it breaks my heart that they must treat us this way. You stop shitting all over me for the original sin of having been born with a penis, and I'll simp so hard (and it'll be genuine) your head will spin.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:21 AM
239

They lost their claim to chivalry long ago when they initiated an almost gender wide fishing expedition for ways in which men are wrong, bad, and evil.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:39 AM
2

Muslims or Arabs?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:33 AM
15

“People say, ‘Oh he’s a boy, let him hit you’” Who on earth says this? Ever? And there's this: all the camouflage Again, what camouflage? I don't see tons of guys running around in camo. and guns. We don't buy guns to fight women, we buy guns to fight other men. If we were intent on hurting women, we won't need guns to do so. Our testosterone and fists are sufficient.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 12:32 AM
1

Men in women's sports is patently unfair, regardless of any other abuses happening to men. And this is not coming from a woman worshipper, it's simple logic. We don't allow heavyweights into lightweight boxing for a reason. This is no different.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 11:23 PM
1

"real masculinity" is all about being useful to the woman And other men. Many men focus on being masculine instead of actually looking good The two aren't mutually exclusive. because their traditional roles(anything that relates to masculinity) are not really needed in modern society They may not be needed, but they are still sexually attractive to women. man is still nothing more than someone who takes care of the woman and the woman isn't really attracted to him regardless of how much sex she …
/r/MensRights27/03/22 11:22 PM
-1

Women like real masculinity. Those "Macho men" that women don't like are tryhards.
/r/MensRights27/03/22 10:12 PM
1

Nope. Disagree. You expel malcontents, you don't punish everyone else. Also imagine if the subject in this was black people instead of boys. Imagine there are still separate bathrooms, and black people had to get them unlocked before they could use them. Why are people so willing to bend over backwards to defend discriminatory (Bigoted) policy when the subject is men?
/r/MensRights26/03/22 11:36 PM
1

Did the tampons you speak of kick the toilet off the floor causing hundreds of dollars in damages? Regardless, it's just as much of a reason to lock the girls bathroom. And you may not have experienced it, but if you ask a plumber they'll tell you all about. Ignorant women do flush tampons, and condoms. (That last I know from experience.) Listen, I get it, I'm a chick so anything I say is going to be down voted. I had no idea you were a chick. I'm not on the school board so I don't understand wh…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:37 AM
3

So, because of some assholes, all boys have to suffer? What if one of them is having an IBS session? Do the teachers just hop to when a boy asks to be let in? No, it's discrimination. And BTW I wonder how many times a bathroom has been flooded by girls flushing tampons?
/r/MensRights26/03/22 12:10 AM
2

Innocent until proven guilty seems to be out of style these days, regarding sexual assault, at least.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 11:08 PM
3

There's a difference between telling boys not to cry when they don't get their way, which I think is actually a positive message that girls should also receive, and don't cry at your grandfather's funeral, which I'm pretty sure nobody is actually saying.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 03:42 AM
1

As it gets bigger it's no longer a gap. Nope, a gap can be any size you want it. There is a 4 lightyear gap between earth and alpha centauri, but it's still a gap.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 04:21 AM
0

Not trying to be a dick, but you're the first person I've seen to suggest that a gap suggests small.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 03:11 AM
1

Nah, a gap can be pretty much any size. Don't know where you got the idea it had to be small.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 11:56 PM
6

Yup. Your money is her money, and her money is her money.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 11:54 PM
1

Someone still have to carry those rifles, and sometimes bombs. But isn't just physical strength that men have over women, men are also faster, and we have more grit than women. The stuff that makes you walk barefoot over 50 feet of hot coals because if nobody does it, the bomb goes off and everyone dies. The stuff that makes you keep going when you're cold and can barely keep your eyes open from not having slept for 42 hours.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 11:22 PM
4

The message is the solution.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 10:33 PM
3

I don't care if it was a purple space alien with 6 sets of eyes, and 3 sets of arms who made the laws, they're fucking men over, and it has to stop.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 01:37 AM
4

I don't rally against capitalism because while capitalism has it's flaws, the alternative is far, far, worse.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 12:36 AM
-9

I don't know why, but for some reason whenever someone uses the term "scrote" I always think of the word testicle.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:24 AM
2

She doesn't pretend racism doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 12:34 AM
9

If there was phrase in the dictionary called "Ugly to the very core of their soul", this woman's picture would be next to it.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 03:17 AM
27

Watching the left eating the left is always entertaining.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 02:44 AM
2

Why are we even bothering with FDS? FDS is the very definition of low-hanging fruit.
/r/MensRights04/03/22 10:09 PM
0

I will grant that being hit on constantly while walking down the street can be pretty tiresome, and even more so when the idiot has no social intelligence and can't take no for answer, and can't tell when a woman is most definitely not interested.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 09:39 PM
1

Well, when they write articles claiming that even when men focus on women's pleasure during sex, he's still only doing it for himself, the answer to your question is, yes. There's no pleasing these hags, don't bother making the attempt.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 09:01 PM
5

Don't let those suspensions scare you brothers. It's more important to do the right thing.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:04 AM
2

discharge Don't think so. If they know that was your game, why would you put it past em to make up some other crime and come up with an actual punishment? Discharging someone you conscripted isn't exactly a punishment. Militaries worldwide have been known to use physical punishment (Whipping/flogging), and in some cases execution. There are plenty that are still doing it. Also, I've been arguing in bad faith. I agree with conscription in this case.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:46 AM
4

You don't think they won't make up a crime to punish you for doing that?
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:23 AM
7

Military trial. For crimes against military law while serving.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:20 AM
11

I would imagine during war time if you pull those shenanigans you might find yourself facing a court martial.
/r/MensRights25/02/22 12:15 AM
23

Dating preferences for taller men are fine. But complete unpersoning of someone for their height most certainly isn't.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:05 AM
3

It's not a tit for tat. Whether or not someone says thank you for a meal that I paid for is an indication what type of person they are and how they are going to treat me in the relationship.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:34 AM
2

If you're just dating for fun, then women not saying thank you at the end, is not fun. So I'd stop doing it. If you're trying to find "The one" then keep kickin' em' to the curb until one does treat you right.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:32 AM
98

You forgot young, vulnerable and attractive.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 02:15 AM
11

They don't necessarily do it because they're homophobic, they do it because they think it will hurt you. Which just goes more to their shady character, that they're more interested in "beating" you than they are in winning you over.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 04:06 AM
6

Hence, why he rejected her.
/r/MensRights09/02/22 01:21 AM
1

But due to flaws in the system, it's already been done. So what should we do? Nothing. There isn't a problem. The system for the most part is working fine. These billionaires are not making that money by gouging people (mostly). I looked up the profit margins, the highest profit margin is thrift store operators at about a 100% (Don't think there are any thrift store billionaire tycoons). Then it was the pharmaceutical companies at 20%, then oil and gas at about 10%. They're billionaires, because…
/r/MensRights06/02/22 06:48 AM
1

Well, yeah, technically to be universal they'd have to be sending those checks to babies too. But I think we can let that slide...
/r/MensRights05/02/22 09:28 AM
-6

It’s redistributing resources from people who should never have been able to make billions in the first place Who the fuck gives you the right to make this distinction? If you've got evidence that a particular billionaire has committed criminal acts to make those billions, I'm all ears. Otherwise kindly piss off you judgmental fuck. to people who have 2 jobs and can’t afford rent. The billionaires didn't create that situation for them. It’s also going to become more and more important as we stru…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 05:44 AM
1

So why should the 15% of self-harming, suicidal men with BPD not receive treatment? Nope, you're right. They should get treatment.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 04:23 AM
11

No real UBI should be the government just sends all individuals over the age of 18 a check.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 03:09 AM
-4

I very much support a UBI as an economic stimulus. I don't. It's far from being a stimulus. What it really is, is "We take money from people we don't like and give it to people we do". Also the idea of "stimulus" is a faulty one. It's like running out warm water for your bath, scooping some out of the right side and dumping in the left, thinking you're going to create more warm water. Or there's an old Native American proverb that says "Only the government thinks it can cut one foot of the botto…
/r/MensRights05/02/22 03:08 AM
1

Never to mention that these UBI tests are a joke anyway. They are far from scientific, and as this article points out, they are never universal.
/r/MensRights05/02/22 03:04 AM
0

Well, I'm not against sex selective therapies if there is sound science behind it. IE, generally speaking you only treat men for prostate cancer right?
/r/MensRights05/02/22 01:42 AM
1

:Yawn:
/r/MensRights04/02/22 02:11 PM
1

I've been nothing but calm and collected this whole exchange, but if you must fantasize that you've ruffled my feathers in even the slightest, who am I to stop you?
/r/MensRights04/02/22 12:57 AM
1

Projecting much? You're the who has had nothing but insults to offer.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 07:53 PM
1

What do you have reddit notifications turned on or something? Probably a bad idea considering how much shit you talk. But you're right, I'm getting bored of this. Peace.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 01:20 AM
1

also, i was making fun of YOU not men. Really? You used the word "babes". Plural. You're full of shit.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:47 AM
1

afterall, theres clearly not very much going on up there You're not making fun of anyone, but you continue to make statements like this? Also, you talk like a 12 year old who just go their first phone.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:44 AM
1

Then what the hell was this? sorry babes the world doesn’t revolve around u! pack it in dick cheese What are you? 13?
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:36 AM
1

Very mature.
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:35 AM
1

You'll find the law to very hostile to you abdicating your child support responsibilities. You were lied to, but rape-by-deception isn't a thing, man-on-woman, or woman-on-man. And even if you were raped the old fashioned way, IE rape via force or threat of force, or coercion, the law would still want you to pay CS, you might have a case for suing her to get it back, but you'll have 18 years of having to give part of your paycheck to the courts, and hope and pray she'll comply with a civil court…
/r/MensRights03/02/22 12:00 AM
1

Better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
/r/MensRights02/02/22 11:06 PM
1

I find that those who cry loudest for the end of competition, are those that can not compete. I don't care for sports myself, but a lot of people get a whole lot of enjoyment from them. Leave them alone.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 04:00 AM
2

Yet more masculine women don't have a competitive advantage anyway? Somewhat, but I'd wager a birth-male vs a butch woman any day of the week. I myself am no real specimen of masculinity, and I have wrestled women (all in fun on both sides) and found very little, to no resistance, it was trivial. Maybe, just maybe a more butch woman could provide somewhat of a challenge, but considering the strength level of the women I tussled with, she'd have to be VERY butch. The whole idea of competition thr…
/r/MensRights01/02/22 02:25 AM
3

My opinion is thus: First? Besides being a murder victim, who is Sarah Everard? Why should I give any more thought to her death than any other person, male or female? Two, her murder is horrible, no doubt, however one murder does not indicate a trend of any kind, and using it as a shame bludgeon to bash all men over the head with is just hateful sexist bigotry, even if the reason for her death was misogyny (Which I am not convinced of)- it was one man, not all men.
/r/MensRights01/02/22 12:42 AM
1

They were getting ready to leave? They weren't just shooting the shit? Then she was definitely in the wrong.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:33 PM
3

I guess, but at that point it starts getting pedantic. If you're gay, are you only attracted to members of your sex if they were born members or your sex? Or are those who have transitioned to your sex also acceptable? And does it have to be a full on transition with surgeries? Or will someone claiming to be your sex do? But then you're just having straight sex. And blah, blah, blah and on and on....
/r/MensRights31/01/22 10:04 PM
2

That said, the law in question is that any person can declare their own gender without a diagnosis and I am 100 percent for that. Then you're an idiot. If you have a penis, no amount of feeling and thinking like a woman will make it disappear. Doctors don't know what gender you are better than you do. You don't have to be a doctor. Anyone who sees your unmentionable bits can tell what you are. Just thinking and feeling a certain way won't change your plumbing.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:49 PM
2

How are gay men affected by the trans women in sports debate?
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:46 PM
5

Well, this one kinda really is about women though. The trans rights crusade that has spilled over into sports is really a huge disadvantage for women. IDK what you feel like on the inside, if you spend your puberty growing up as a boy, for the purposes of sports, you're a man. You have an unfair advantage over women, and the only people who will ever win championships in women's sports will be trans.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:45 PM
2

Men don't get a pass for that. A guy goes around sleeping with all the women in his social circle, when they find out, he loses all his opportunity there. Also, guys that sleep with tons of women are gross.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 09:25 PM
51

It sounds like they just need a reminder that you don't need them. I would more characterize it as a reminder that they can lose you. I don't really relish living in a world where spouses don't need each other.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 12:00 AM
1

but it’s wrong to force people to go Not entirely sure I agree with you. You live in the country and gain the benefits of it's services, if the country is in need, such as a hostile nation is invading, it would be wrong of you to expect others to fight them off without your help.
/r/MensRights29/01/22 02:26 AM
60

because they are underrepresented when it comes to women. Maybe if you can show me the case where qualified women are being turned down for positions simply because they are women, then I can care about this. But since you do, maybe you can start solving the problem, by seeing to it that women become qualified for the positions they're not getting. Simply shoehorning women into positions they are not qualified for with these diversity agendas is not the way.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 10:31 AM
1

Maybe we’re getting through to them about proper reporting. The NYT? Fat chance. They still haven't fired that racist bitch Sarah Jeong. The NYT is a lost cause.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 07:42 AM
7

Why wouldn't it? Are the only men that exist white men?
/r/MensRights28/01/22 07:18 AM
2

Military draft, USA.
/r/MensRights28/01/22 05:56 AM
1

I'm getting pretty tired of the combative nature of this exchange. Society at large.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 11:36 PM
1

You know, who gets to decide what is or isn't 'creepy behaviour'... The individual affected. If they're reasonable.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 10:43 PM
0

Because creepy behavior does exist?
/r/MensRights25/01/22 04:05 PM
0

Why do you condone that sort of (mostly female/feminist) behaviour?? I condone it to an extent. What I don't condone is the extreme use against men who aren't even looking in their direction, and for behaviors that are benign.
/r/MensRights25/01/22 03:43 AM
0

And here's the other question. Are you suggesting that there is no such thing as creepy behavior?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 10:05 PM
-1

Well, that's where a little social intelligence/intuition comes in. How it would it make you feel if someone were staring at you in that way for that amount of time, regardless of how attractive they were? The difference between sexual harassment and flirting is how attractive the guy or girl is. For a lot of it, yes, but it is still possible for the chads to come off creepy.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 09:29 PM
2

I knew a girl who was working as a store manager for the local gas station. She was being paid a salary, but the owners required her to be there so much, she was earning less than minimum wage. They were incredibly hard to please, and the store was robbed twice while she was there. At that point I decided that I would rather sleep under an overpass before I put myself through that kind of abuse. You've never really known what life is like outside of the abuse, you may find that any amount of pov…
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:11 PM
3

If a child is troubled, a parent gets help for him, not beating him. To add to this, there is no acceptable method of correction that involves BITING a child.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 03:04 PM
3

The problem with the idea behind the male gaze is that it is a feminist over analysis of two simple phenomena, 1. Men like looking at attractive women. 2. Filmmakers are in the business of selling things for people to look at. Put A and B together, and you come up with the answer: filmmakers put sexy women in films, to sell films. Did you also happen to notice that most of the men in these films aren't particularly unattractive either?
/r/MensRights24/01/22 02:40 PM
-2

Just like you said, it's ok to look. Staring creepily however is inappropriate.
/r/MensRights24/01/22 02:33 PM
3

I don't even need to read the article to answer this question. Increase in uneducated men? Increase in crime.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:09 AM
9

He was probably just fantasizing like many of us have in response to these videos of feminists going around confronting men for their menspreading. Honestly I would really have no idea since I don't take public transport, and rarely find myself sitting in public for an extended period of time.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:58 AM
15

And this is some kind of epidemic taking place? Men sitting with their legs open unnaturally far just to fuck with people?
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:51 AM
12

Feminists confront men over manspreading who are just naturally spreading their legs. If you pay attention, you'll notice pretty much all men sit with their legs open. We don't want to crush our testicles, and our hips are built different than women's, even without testicles, sitting with our legs closed takes conscious effort.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:37 AM
12

I've had these conversations with feminists here. It's not a made up argument.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 01:33 AM
6

Unfortunately your message will never get out. The news stories will focus on the act, and then journalists will wring their hands together and say things like "The motive is unclear", and will hide your side if the story.
/r/MensRights16/01/22 11:17 PM
1

We're here to discuss the problems that men face. I'm pretty sure none of us are saying the world revolves around us. In fact we're quite aware that it doesn't. In fact, we recognize that world actually seems to revolve around women. Do you go around to fat people and go "Haha, you're fat"? Do you go to disabled people and say "sucks to be you loser"? Why would you come to a men's rights group and make fun of them? There are men here with real pain, are you some kind of psychopath? We don't want…
/r/MensRights13/01/22 12:20 AM
7

I'm sorry, but I kind of agree with her. And she's being pretty reasonable. Crying, or probably more accurately whining in front of women is and always will be an arousal killer.
/r/MensRights12/01/22 12:52 AM
6

You're in r/mensrights, the fuck did you think we were going to talk about here? Dancing with the stars?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:04 PM
1

700 Mass shootings eh? Next you're going to tell me Santa Clause isn't real.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:38 PM
3

I kid though. You need to play your favorite music, stuff that you know well so you can focus on not crashing the car.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:25 PM
7

Death metal. Or maybe the most misogynistic rap you can find. I kid. Play your favorite music.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:23 PM
8

If you didn't immediately tell them to GTFO of your car, then you weren't stern enough. Pulling the steering wheel while someone is driving is a monumentally stupid move, and at that point a person who thinks it's an acceptable move is a lost cause.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:22 PM
2

If it is trend and you have asked her to stop repeatedly, then time to go to HR. If it's in public, call the police on her for harassment.
/r/MensRights09/01/22 05:18 PM
4

and say that I assaulted them and think it'll work in their favor despite the store being covered in cameras and microphones
/r/MensRights07/01/22 05:08 AM
2

Kenosha only proved that antifa is filled with animals. Kenosha was a fringe case. The vast majority of people faced with AR-15 would back down. Even in Kenosha, remember Kyle only ended up shooting 3 people, and at a 4th person (Jump Kick Man) before the situation was over, while there were hundreds there.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 12:23 AM
2

I prefer the Bill Burr theory: https://youtu.be/QHqB2t-DGb8?t=103 Or I just hope the presence of an object that can hurl hot metal at 1300 ft/second will make them rethink their choices.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 10:23 PM
12

Did you get convicted of anything?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:59 PM
26

I legally carry a pistol. If I defend myself from a woman, and I find a horde of white knights bearing down on me, they're going to be looking down the barrel of a gun.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:58 PM
4

Yeah. She absolutely was wrong. "Because she didn't want to argue with him", that was a personal frustration for her, and not a valid reason to keep him out of your life. She was being selfish. She could have worked it out, she didn't want to try. And he should have fought harder for you, but I can't necessarily blame him completely, given the propaganda around mother/father dynamics.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:18 PM
5

Well, that one stayed up. So, not exactly evidence of sexism at r/askreddit
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:42 PM
6

It got removed because there was already one there: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/rss9n4/what_are_signs_a_woman_hasnt_matured/
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:39 PM
1

Sure for hostile workplace.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:36 PM
28

This isn't even a benefit to them. It isn't like pumping gas is some physically/mentally demanding thing. This was just raw symbolic sexism.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:55 PM
2

No idea where the downvotes are coming from, this is spot on.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:18 AM
7

The answer to ALL these, by the vast majority of men, is going to be that they try to get some regardless of what i say, do, or feel. You know most men, do you? And this is my personal experience with many men over the years, just as it is for almost every other woman. How many men is "many"? Is it 3.5 billion? I doubt it's even close to 3500. Your experience isn't typical.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 02:17 AM
2

Facebook wants to kick someone off for vile speech then they should have to wave all government granted monopolies... Definitely agreed. Now while I'm pretty devoted to my principles, Facebook, Twitter, etc have sort of added confounding factors, and while I loath to say it, I think they need to be reigned in.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 02:07 AM
1

You have to be clear when talking about free speech. Which principle are you referring to? The one that says the government may not restrict speech, or the one that says no one may restrict it? I'm for the former. As far as the cultural impact of free speech, I do believe in some consequences for harmful speech. However a lot of the consequences that are currently being applied are far, far too excessive. If you say something foul, you shouldn't be punished for it, for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 01:28 AM
2

Right, because my white maleness has gotten me so much shit in my life.
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:54 AM
2

So you'd rather be a book burner than be wrongly perceived as evil. This is one of the fundamental misunderstandings of the right to free speech. It is not a right to free speech in all circumstances. It applies only to the government as a restriction on governmental power. If you're a guest in my house and start spouting anti-Semitic Nazi garbage, I have every right to toss your ass to the curb. The other fundamental misunderstanding of it is that it is not a blank check to do whatever fucked u…
/r/MensRights30/12/21 12:47 AM
9

Except, if something like that isn't taken down, it can pointed to as evidence that we are an evil sub, however loosely it may be connected to us. "See what I found on r/menrights?!?"
/r/MensRights29/12/21 11:55 PM
12

What sub was it though? I would assume you would be ok with censorship if it involved child pornography?
/r/MensRights29/12/21 09:19 PM
1

Men don't have lived experiences, duh.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 04:41 AM
1

So it's not a delusion, it's a real problem affirmed by scientists. "Scientists"? Which ones? Also Scientists: "We're going to drain you of blood to let out the bad humors" Aside from that I can reply the same. It has been affirmed by "Scientists" to be a delusion. And it fits the definition of the word "Delusion": "an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of menta…
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:57 AM
2

It's a condition that causes a delusion. Either way, they need help, not enablement.
/r/MensRights25/12/21 02:13 PM
2

They're treating that woman This is what we are talking about. How we treat transgender people in a personal setting. In any setting, personal or otherwise, I refuse to refer someone as anything other than what nature made them. To that end, and to avoid confrontations, I will do what I can to avoid having any sort of encounter with a person who is clearly confused about their gender. Besides, I don't think it's helpful/healthy for that person to have other people support and enable their delusi…
/r/MensRights25/12/21 12:09 AM
-1

Except when such a person makes it my business by freaking out on me when I accidentally call them sir. But in reality, if I saw this person in public, I would simply do my utmost to avoid them.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 11:06 PM
1

What about women that look like men? Should they be called men too and expecting otherwise of you is absurd? I have encountered this. I had a new androgynous looking co-worker and I mistook her for a man. But it wasn't obvious maleness, she just seemed like your typical low-t boy. She explained that she was a biological female, and just naturally looked that way. I apologized profusely for the mistake. This is not the same situation. This is not an androgynous person. This is very obviously a ma…
/r/MensRights24/12/21 10:45 PM
1

No. It isn't. Expecting me to call that person a woman, when he clearly still looks like a man, and is still in possession of his penis is absurd and Orwellian. To expect that of me is to expect me to have massive cognitive dissonance. Now I'm not going to abuse this person or make fun of them, or deny them the necessities of life, but expecting me to call him a her is beyond the pale.
/r/MensRights24/12/21 09:42 PM
1

There are multiple reports of men getting into women's prisons by claiming to be women and then proceeding to rape their female cell mates. I'm all for men's rights, but men claiming to be women, so they can go to women's prisons, and play in women's sports, is completely out of the question.
/r/MensRights23/12/21 05:38 PM
1

The dumb thing about this is that all those movies she's watching? The reason they're interesting? Because the scenarios in those movies ARE NOT COMMON. Does she also think that we can fight like Bourne/Wick? THEY'RE MOVIES. THEY'RE FANTASY.
/r/MensRights21/12/21 02:01 AM
9

that gives better life quality Most definitely debatable.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:31 AM
1

You need to win the hearts and minds of the people to make this happen. You're going to be trying to convince pretty much majority of world-wide population who have been performing circumcisions on their sons with nary a thought to the ethics, since pretty much the beginning of humanity. And it's something you as a parent, can't take back, so you're going to face insurmountable resistance, as people don't want to be guilty of having maimed their sons. I don't forsee circumcision going anywhere f…
/r/MensRights16/12/21 04:30 AM
89

People make fun of other people for the stupidest of reasons. Wearing white socks, nerd. Wearing your watch on your right hand? Must be gay. Do what you want to do, wear what you want to wear, and all those assholes can go piss up a rope. Especially since the only people whose opinions you should care about are those of your family.
/r/MensRights16/12/21 01:15 AM
1

Northeasterner here. I get called hun frequently. It has never bothered me.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 11:16 AM
6

I've been called that. Never had a problem with it.
/r/MensRights15/12/21 11:13 AM
6

Because that's what sex traffickers do right? They walk through stores holding their victims hands?
/r/MensRights14/12/21 11:55 PM
23

Yeah, I find the idea of protected groups revolting. That leaves the non-protected groups which you are free to abuse, and discriminate against at will?
/r/MensRights14/12/21 01:45 AM
3

Knowledge. Warren Farrell, a feminist turned MRA wanted to give talk on male suicide and a bunch of nasty feminists showed up and screamed at and blocked anybody who wanted to attend: https://www.joshuakennon.com/the-warren-farrell-protest-at-the-university-of-toronto/ There was a video. I've seen it. It was revolting. It's gone now, can't find it. Strange that. Errin Pizzey, the founder of Britain's first women's shelter found out that men suffer domestic abuse as much as women and also tried t…
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:56 AM
2

Registering, no. Running one is when the fun starts.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 09:22 AM
2

And honestly, that’s a huge indictment of the men’s rights movement. No. It's an indictment of the feminist movement. Since every time a man steps out of line and tries to create a male centric charity, the feminists come out of the woodwork, and terrorize and bully the man who started into submission, and men who start these types of charities get no support at all from society at large when the feminists attack.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 04:59 AM
2

No. There aren't.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:27 AM
1

The problem with talking openly about your salaries is that a lot of people don't understand. You may be able to justify your higher salary, but that's no guarantee that your co-worker is going to agree with it. Talking about your salary would create a lot of strife in your life.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 01:21 AM
1

Don't be so sure of that.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 11:52 PM
2

A simp is a person who worships women, and jumps to their defense even if they are the one in the wrong. Wanting cuddles, doesn't make you a simp, nor does it make you a loser.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 11:47 PM
2

So, ya gotta shit your pants then? Human rights violation.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 11:36 PM
8

They have a bad case of MUS (Male Unicorn Syndrome). "See, all the rest of you men are god awful. (except for me of course, I'm one of the good ones)"
/r/MensRights08/12/21 02:20 AM
11

This is how we get judges with MUS (Male Unicorn Syndrome) who harshly sentence men for their crimes. All other men are awful, but not them, they're one of the good ones.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 01:01 AM
3

There are many reasons to need to get someone's attention, asking for a favor is only one of them.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 11:15 AM
1

No. You are not.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 11:13 AM
2

If you're in a school where you may very well have signage saying don't touch another person without their consent, it's arguable. I haven't stepped foot inside a school for 22 years. Out in the real world, if you're unable to hear me, or I can't get your attention verbally, it is generally acceptable to tap someone on the shoulder for that purpose. but you asked if there was law Yeah, I didn't believe there was a law against tapping someone on the shoulder (at least in western countries), if th…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 03:04 AM
8

Texas Penal Code § 22.01. Intentionally or knowingly causes physical contact with another when the person knows or should reasonably believe that the other will regard the contact as offensive or provocation. As a human being, I would assume that the vast majority of people are OK with being tapped on the shoulder. As far as should know? Most of us are quite aware it's not OK to put your hand on someone's back intimately or touch someone else on one of their erroneous zones, IE breasts, butt, in…
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:29 AM
4

Really? I'd like to see that law. I wouldn't bother trying to produce it if I were you, I'm relatively certain it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:04 AM
4

Eh, my brother was paying about that much for his daughter. For reference he's never had a good job, so he's poor as fuck.
/r/MensRights07/12/21 01:03 AM
23

I'm a male who also hates being touched You live in the human world. Sometimes people need to touch you on the shoulder to get your attention. This is something you need to get over. and also I would never loan my personal affects out like that either And that is your prerogative, and when they ask, a simple no would be sufficient, no need to be a dick about it.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:30 PM
13

You're allowed to tap someone on the shoulder to get their attention.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:28 PM
19

How about trying a constant barrage of "#killallmen" and "#menaretrash", and general man hate on social media turning modern women into man haters, and making these types of encounters far more common than they should be.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 09:28 PM
1

This is what the big push to get women careers, and affirmative action brings.
/r/MensRights06/12/21 02:16 AM
3

Stargate SG1, Episode "The Fourth Horseman" (Think it was part 2) has a very powerful emotional scene where Dr. Lam reconciles with her father General Landry, saying she realizes now that her father wasn't the awful man she thought he was.
/r/MensRights02/12/21 01:35 AM
5

I realize that, but it looks like my comment is being misunderstood. As in when the feminist complains that "some men" take it as a green light to start hitting women, she's misrepresenting "some men" as representing this sub.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 09:36 PM
7

Dude, knock it off. He's not a TrollX shill either. He's coming into this after months and months of wokesters who want to limit free speech by proclaiming "Hate speech is violence" which allows them to proclaim any speech they don't like, IE, debunking their idiotic delusions as "hate speech" so they can ban it. Which is clearly not the same thing as what we're talking about here. Words are not violence if they are meant to convey a political message, but women can indeed do a lot of damage wit…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:51 PM
6

IDK what you're talking about. I've been posting in r/mensrights for years as an MRA, look through my post history. Maybe people just aren't understanding what I was saying.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 08:33 PM
-13

The "some men" part of that quote is all you need to read. "Some" tells us nothing about prevalence of men who wish to beat on women. And it doesn't represent all or even most of mankind.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 05:28 PM
1

Why don't you cut me some slack? I saw "Kyle" and "2A leader " and since the Rittenhouse case has been all over the news, so my brain filled it in.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:22 AM
5

Wait, I don't get it. Now white people don't have rights either?
/r/MensRights28/11/21 12:28 AM
3

This is unhelpful claptrap. Do you have any source for this claim?
/r/MensRights25/11/21 01:18 PM
0

You seem pro-vigilantism, and No, not vigilantism, vengeance. A la "A time to kill" Or the Gary Plauche story. Gary Plauche finds out that his son's karate instructor had been molesting him for over a year. The police arrest the karate instructor. Then Plauce find the route the police will be taking KS. Plauche does a minor disguise. Pretends he's on one of the payphones. Waits until the police are walking by, pulls out a revolver and one taps the creep. Right in front of the police and news cam…
/r/MensRights23/11/21 02:41 AM
1

Except the guy that she killed had done the same thing to about a dozen other girls (Remember rapists are actually quite rare and most rapists do so repeatedly) and filmed his sexual assaults. The police were about to arrest the guy for his assaults. Guy was an absolute POS and had it coming.
/r/MensRights23/11/21 01:25 AM
4

I wonder if taking that turn too hard was really an accident. It's possible, but unlikely. Taking a turn too hard is an easy trap for motorcyclists. You get cocky, and misjudge the tightness of the curve and over the side you go. I would know I've taken a few turns too fast, but I was able to brake and recover in time. I mean, if you wanted to kill yourself you could just drive straight off the road.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:45 PM
1

I already have considered it. Still not sure about it. I've been trying to get my brother to move in.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:41 PM
11

It's just one of the many illogicities of the left. Opposed to people looting and burning innocent businesses? Racist. Want to own a gun for self-defense? What about the children? Opposing mandating anything being done? What you don't think people should do that? You post on r/mensrights? Why do you hate women?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 11:33 PM
1

Try it, fill it with memes about the silly but adorable things women do.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 10:12 PM
29

Hey CNN, the term "Thug" has been used for centuries, maybe even millenia, long before any white people had ever met a black man. It applies to all races/sexes/creeds/sexual orientations and gender identities. You run around threatening people, throwing molotov cocktails, boss people around whom you have no authority over I'm going to call you a thug.
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:29 PM
2

Except, we've seen plenty of cases the child that was murdered by the perp was a girl, and they still get a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:13 AM
4

It's a stock reply. What do you do when you're a woman and accused of some heinous crime? Why, blame the man, of course.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:00 AM
2

Holy uncalled for. This is r/MensRights, not r/WeHateWomenInc.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 02:24 AM
7

Sorry guys, looks like screwed up the title. It should say "10 month old daughter" instead of "10 year old daughter."
/r/MensRights19/11/21 01:31 AM
1

You can't walk and chew bubblegum at the same time?
/r/MensRights15/11/21 10:22 PM
10

Let nobody ever tell you that women can't ever be as dangerous as men.
/r/MensRights14/11/21 07:05 PM
1

If your people are being slaughtered and tortured by a foreign country and you go to war to stop it, it's a justified war. To that point: In the 20th century the estimated war dead is 108 million Compared to- In the 20th century, people simply murdered by a government not through warfare is 262 million IDK, I'd think if those people were armed and went to war with the government that was killing them, that number might be significantly smaller. Now hear me- I don't worship warfare any more than …
/r/MensRights14/11/21 12:39 AM
1

I will amend. If it's a just war, and helps everyone, everyone should pay.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 07:32 PM
1

That’s why I mentioned arms dealers. The military industrial complex should pay. Without arms dealers, we would not have been able to stop Hitler. The military industrial complex should pay. No, everyone should pay, because everyone benefits from a war that we win. Our cause being just or unjust is immaterial.
/r/MensRights13/11/21 03:56 AM
-1

You want to go to war with all woman kind?
/r/MensRights12/11/21 12:32 AM
3

Women do have legitimate claims to some societal injustices. But so do men. In face I would wager that in this age (perhaps all ages), men have far more, and far more potent ones. I'm game for fixing both gender's issues.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 11:34 PM
1

RECORD.
/r/MensRights11/11/21 11:30 PM
1

What country then? I'd like to look up the recording law.
/r/MensRights10/11/21 10:43 PM
1

May I ask what state you're in?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 10:22 PM
2

She was already reported to the police. Did you not see where I said she just got out of prison for arson?
/r/MensRights10/11/21 01:47 PM
93

A woman I was working with (Who was also making passes at me) admitted to just coming out of prison for arson. She admits that she did it. While her ex boyfriend was sleeping inside. How she was not charged with attempted murder, I do not know.
/r/MensRights09/11/21 12:58 AM
3

Only in the deluded zero sum mind of a radical feminist can loving a man be the same as hating women.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 12:53 AM
2

I would reply, "Why, yes, it is disrespectful. And you earned it by being an unrespectable sexist."
/r/MensRights01/11/21 11:28 PM
7

Just learn the stock phrase: "Do you have a source for that?" and you'll be all set.
/r/MensRights31/10/21 04:37 PM
8

Go away Nazi.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 11:08 PM
1

The least you could do is be honest and say you're defending singular case of justifiable sexism. Well, yes. I didn't think I was concealing that fact. Hitherto: Higher car insurance premiums for men, and higher health insurance premiums for women are justified.
/r/MensRights30/10/21 01:13 AM
1

No, and just the same estrogen doesn't make every woman crazy. And I'm not defending sexism, I'm defending profit motive.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 11:53 PM
1

It's based on statistics. Testosterone makes us take greater risks than women, a fundamental nature of humanity. Makes us a greater risk to insure. So, I'm on board with the higher rates. What I'm not on board for is the double standard. Women use medical services more often than men, but if you suggest that women pay higher premiums, you will be pilloried and burned at the stake socially and professionally.
/r/MensRights29/10/21 10:37 PM
3

This female manager :"I saw this thing that is totally not any sort of real offense, but since I'm a sexist, I assumed a man did it, and proceeded to shit all over him, even though he didn't do it, and even if he did, it wouldn't have made him a criminal" But I've heard multiple women say the reason they freak out over the toilet seat being up, is because they sometimes go to the bathroom in the dark and fall in. And they said it dead seriously too. And don't feel like I'm shitting on only women…
/r/MensRights28/10/21 10:51 PM
10

Do you also roll through the downtown Detroit slums in your Dodge Viper, and shouting at all the poor people, why don't you have this much money, I do!?
/r/MensRights25/10/21 12:01 AM
14

Be Channing Tatum.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:24 PM
26

Be Channing Tatum.
/r/MensRights24/10/21 11:12 PM
4

Well according to another poster, the bare breasts belonged to a 19 year old.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 01:04 AM
4

Ok, just looked it up and yeah, you're right. The movie is now slightly less exploitative of minor girls.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 01:03 AM
0

From what I understand, there were actual underage naked breasts in that movie. Which is one of the many reasons I have avoided watching it, even to give it an honest try.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 11:40 PM
1

Don't remember exactly, something about breaking the woman's jaw or something.
/r/MensRights19/10/21 07:54 PM
1

My views formed in reaction to the left and its radicalism. I have noticed that pretty much every viewpoint held by the left seems to be the exact inverse of what the right believes, even on things that should be universal, if a conservative is for it, then the left has to be against it.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 11:21 PM
0

WTF? No.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 10:02 PM
2

There are some whiny losers here. But, to the original point: This woman is being one herself. She's complaining about being asked out (politely) by an unattractive male, and calling it oppression, which is absurd. Do you not agree that it is absurd? Why would you argue that it isn't?
/r/MensRights14/10/21 10:37 PM
3

You: "Hey bros, I'm totally a bro like you, and I think as bros we can do better..."
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:31 PM
6

As to the "maybe only white women make false accusations" thing... One the most egregious examples of a man suffering the results of a false accusation was that of a black man who spent 28 years in jail over a false accusation of rape. The testimony he was convicted of? She dreamed he raped her. It was a black woman, who got an innocent black man sent to jail for 28 years because she dreamed it.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 08:19 PM
3

She's a cute comedian. Her stuff is so-so, and she seems to be somewhat self aware.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:33 AM
6

Go away concern troll.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 12:06 AM
5

Don't agree. I mean, yeah, the ignoring men thing is a problem, but women could literally spend their lives sleeping on a cloud with everything they ever wanted hand fed to them, and some feminist would still write an article with something to complain about.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 11:02 PM
3

Yeah, that was utter crap. Almost every business ever was considered essential. I worked the entire shutdown.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 11:00 PM
2

Not sure why you're being downvoted. This is objectively true.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 10:57 PM
1

I'm not exactly sure this is a hill worth fighting on.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 10:56 PM
22

Did we forget that one of the chosen speakers at the woman's march in DC was a convicted murderer who along with a couple of accomplices kidnapped a man and tortured him for weeks before they murdered him? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donna_Hylton The capacity for feminists to be deranged sociopaths no longer surprises me.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 11:41 PM
1

Hey, she's at least self aware.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 07:52 PM
2

Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 07:51 PM
3

Or if you have deep rooted issues with women. I don't, I'm not the one who made the comment. I'm just telling you how I took it. Yeah it was worded badly, but I took it as frustration about the situation, and not any real animus toward the girl in question.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 07:35 PM
17

I really don't think there's any evidence that feminists are okay with stabbing children to death. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/she-the-people/post/after-birth-abortion-can-they-be-serious/2012/03/03/gIQADgiOsR_blog.html
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:52 PM
5

She was probably a sweetheart. However when you're in the middle of a rant, it just kind of rolls off the tongue.
/r/MensRights09/10/21 02:49 PM
1

Illinois is basically the polar opposite of Texas. It's a heavy leftist/democrat leaning state, and hosts the city of Chicago, one of, if not the most corrupt cities in the US. Maybe on the planet.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:08 PM
1

I'm guessing we have someone fairly young here.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 10:07 PM
2

Sure, and I will delete my comment.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 10:37 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQglZPVmoo8
/r/MensRights03/10/21 04:10 PM
1

People who make reports would have to provide ID or we'd have to verify the legitimacy of the report some other way. Definitely will have to vet every one before posting it. But the report that shows up on the site wouldn't have their name attached to it.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 08:42 PM
3

I guess child support isn't sufficient punishment?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:55 PM
1

I'm ok with this, but how do you deal with false reports?
/r/MensRights30/09/21 09:54 PM
1

I was going to suggest this. How much do you wanna bet that that group of men she described as "unsavory" were a group of our more melanin endowed brethren?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 10:52 PM
2

Men with these illnesses use it as an excuse to abuse women First off, put the broad brush away, and second women don't do this?
/r/MensRights27/09/21 08:38 PM
1

Wasn't suggesting that.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 11:35 PM
10

There is some justification for using motive to determine the severity of a sentence, if there is a sentence. If you kill another person who was trying to kill you, that's self defense. You're not a murderer.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:49 PM
2

Because apparently a murder charge is not sufficient.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:45 PM
1

It took probably less than 2 minutes to post it, and it is relevant.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 10:11 PM
1

The virus was created in a lab in Wuhan, funded with US taxpayer money, secured by the infinitely corrupt Dr. Fauci.
/r/MensRights23/09/21 09:31 PM
2

If it's legalized, they'll have to pay tax.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:01 PM
1

Nobody is obligated to prove they're not something. If someone is accusing you of being something evil, it is their obligation to prove you are.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 09:31 PM
7

they aren't willing to communicate What you can't read minds? Such a n00b.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 05:31 PM
6

I'm pretty sure it was Esme Bianco, the chick who played the prostitute "Roz" in game of thrones.
/r/MensRights16/09/21 10:11 PM
3

Where is this where the police are taking action against you? Like is this in the US?
/r/MensRights16/09/21 09:35 PM
1

Don't agree. I'm not paying for your failure to pull out.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 10:36 PM
4

Eh, I blame this one on the EW and her paramour poisoning their minds.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:31 PM
1

As much of fucking brats that they were, they're still his kids. In his shoes I would have taken them in, under the caveat that they would be working hard to find themselves decent jobs, and if that means more schooling then so be it. But they have to be absolute angels while they're there, any attitude at all and they can find their way to the door.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:30 PM
6

You were drinking and partying with another girl while you had a GF? Not the smoothest of moves bro.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 08:25 PM
2

Some of it is. Simping is more like coming to the defense of some woman when she's being called out, even when she's definitely objectively in the wrong. There was this pretty girl at my old job and I had to work next to her, and she was being insufferable. I was venting about it to another dude, and the dude wanted to fight me! Because I how dare I say anything bad about m'lady?
/r/MensRights14/09/21 07:47 PM
2

They're the male version of a basic bitch.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 07:45 PM
7

Guess who won't be buying an Ola scooter.
/r/MensRights13/09/21 10:00 PM
1

Expulsion is a pretty severe punishment, and that would depend on what exactly was done. If it was a butt slap/grab, or a boob grab, some kind of punishment is warranted, but not expulsion. If it is something more severe like penetration with a finger or object or ongoing harassment, then definitely expulsion and/or criminal charges are warranted.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:18 PM
0

Where the hell did you get that from?
/r/MensRights12/09/21 08:15 PM
-1

So you're saying sexually molesting someone else against their will or without consent is NOT deviancy? No it isn't. A crime yes. Deviancy, no. As I said, people want to grope each other. Just like people want other people's things. There isn't something mentally wrong with people who steal, but we still regard it as a crime. There isn't something mentally wrong with people grope either. Otherwise, there are about 12 different women I have met in my life who should have criminal records. But the…
/r/MensRights12/09/21 05:23 PM
0

Groping is not sexual deviancy. People want to grope each other. Groping without consent is a sign of lack of self control, but not deviancy.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 04:37 PM
2

Just remember, peasant, you are not allowed to touch M'lady. For this crime, you shall suffer 100 days in the stocks. But in all seriousness, yes, groping a girl without her permission is a offense, and some sort of punishment is warranted. But to suggest that it should be expulsion and a criminal record can only come from a mind saturated with misandry.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 04:34 PM
2

Let's go a little deeper then. The justification for this move is the quest for equality. But not equality as you or I might understand it, they're going for equity, IE, everyone has the same amount of wealth, there's 50/50 representation of men and women, et. I'm not against it per se, but in my mind the ends do not justify the means. IE discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/09/21 02:08 PM
2

Well, if you bang high class hookers frequently, you'll spend enough to buy a house.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 11:13 PM
5

You have a hard time understanding why discriminating against half the population is a problem?
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:28 PM
1

Biblical morality is irrelevant to atheists. I have encountered quite a few Atheists who were quite militant in their Atheism, and who defined themselves in opposition to christians. They were more like Anti-Theists than atheists, not so much that they didn't believe in God, but that they hated christians.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 06:52 PM
1

In which case, shouldn't that make christians pro-choice? And make it an even easier case for atheists to be pro-life? Nobody is choosing their abortion stance because of the bible.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 06:18 PM
1

Well, ok. Still doesn't say anything on the morality of it. And even if it did, atheists can still hold some of the same moral positions as the bible.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 06:03 PM
2

The official name for North Korea is "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". There is nothing democratic or republican about NK. It is a monarchy. The names of things really mean nothing.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 04:43 PM
2

But if men and women are the same, how were men able to have control of the food?
/r/MensRights06/09/21 01:27 AM
1

I get it. I don't agree with it.
/r/MensRights06/09/21 12:33 AM
3

So she's a power tripping narcissist. Aint no fixing that. I would just get out of there.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 11:02 PM
2

What probably makes them worse is they're probably incredibly unproductive.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:48 PM
3

Being pro something can also be quite negative. Think being pro-slavery. Would you find anyone opposed to someone calling themselves anti-slavery?
/r/MensRights05/09/21 10:36 PM
11

Because it's easier to keep beating that "old white men are the devil" drum, than to actually face your opposition truly.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:42 PM
1

It does appear to be the one where most pro-lifers come from though.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 01:35 PM
6

The existence of the Teacher's Union kind takes away from your assertion.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 01:47 AM
2

that didn't sound like a limp feminist excuse My favorite is when they bang on about "reproductive health". I'm sorry, is there a movement of people out there trying to stop you from seeing a gynecologist? Are they trying to ban drugs and treatments that heal your ovaries?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:31 PM
1

I've been saying this for quite some time. The bible doesn't actually say anything about abortion. You don't need to be a Christian to be pro-life.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 09:27 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m9wyvd/notallmen_isnt_a_strong_enough_statement_need/
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:37 PM
1

Not a slam dunk either way.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 06:31 PM
2

Oh, I'm sure that wasn't the reason given. A modern factory environment has so many rules and regulations that it's hard not to be in violation of some of them. They probably made up some BS about his performance, or quality or some such.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 02:25 PM
1

Well, that's the point isn't? If this were an anti male movie like all of you keep wanting to push, the men wouldn't be portrayed as "innocent".
/r/MensRights04/09/21 12:55 PM
1

All women who sleep with hot men because they’re hot… lie about that being the reason? And it's not women per say I got the dumb messages from, I would say it came from feminist inspired media. I can't count the number of times the ham handed casanova trope has been used. But to see the "lame pickup attempts" work on actual women caused me a fair degree of cognitive dissonance. To see it work when I tried it... All that shit women say about having to be funny, intellectual, good conversationalis…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:48 PM
1

Sorry, do men not sleep with women just because they’re hot? Of course we do. We just don't lie about it. You’re allowed to sleep with someone if both adults consent. No problem with this. Doesn’t have to be about gender. When men start making up all kinds of syrupy sounding reasons for not sleeping with ugly women, we can say that. You sound bitter and jealous. Bitter, yes. Jealous not so much. I'm a good looking guy that missed out on a lot of opportunities because I internalized the male-sham…
/r/MensRights03/09/21 10:27 PM
1

Oh come on, there are plenty of serial killer movies featuring a charming male antagonist.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 02:58 PM
3

My dad had a tenant who dropped the fact that she had been raped into almost every conversation. Maybe it's just me, but I imagine if a woman had actually been raped, it's not something they want to talk about all the time.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:14 PM
5

I just moved my remote 6 inches. It caused a puff of wind which made something else happen, and yadda yadda yadda, it caused a boulder to fall and kill someone's kid somewhere across the world.... Yeah, I'm ok with indirectly.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:17 AM
3

I'm pretty sure purposefully infecting you with aids HARMS you, which is what I said. So yeah, that can be banned.
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:14 AM
1

Come on guys, this isn't where the fight is. The women doing this are portrayed as villains.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:05 PM
0

Again, plenty of top tier actors have played murderous villains with a penchant for killing women, and their careers continued on unabated.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:04 PM
1

According to the Wikipedia article, the women are the villains.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:03 PM
1

This isn't what you think it is. From the Wikipedia article: "Disgusted, she turns against them and vows to stop with men and soldiers’ help." The women in this movie are indeed villains, and the main protagonist, another woman, stops them. And yes, there are movies and TV shows all the time about crazed men killing women.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 11:02 PM
0

I don't particularly care for effeminate men myself. However, as a rule I'm against banning anything that doesn't actually directly harm another person.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 09:58 PM
1

It just feels patronizing is all. You want to sell me a razor? Tell me how close it's going to cut. Tell me how smooth my skin will feel after. Tell me how much less likely I am to nick myself. Don't put Macho Man Randy Savage in the ad shaving with it to prove how manly your razor is. Likewise, using big boobed models to sell it won't win me over either. I like big boobs. I don't like being patronized. That having been said, this Manscaped commercial is comedy gold: https://www.youtube.com/watc…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 08:36 PM
1

Why bother impressing women, when they sleep with incredibly unimpressive men all the time, because the man was hot?
/r/MensRights02/09/21 08:30 PM
9

There's a fallacy named after this phenomenon, it's the "Apex Fallacy". https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Apex_fallacy
/r/MensRights01/09/21 11:27 PM
7

All kings were men, therefore all men are kings. That's a good one, I like that one.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:20 PM
13

Becoming?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:19 PM
1

Let me guess, you got accused of Islamophobia too?
/r/MensRights01/09/21 07:42 PM
57

Well, to start with, and I think I can speak for all of us, we're not looking for special treatment. We're looking for fair treatment.
/r/MensRights30/08/21 10:13 PM
31

Having never really been kicked hard in the balls, nor given childbirth, I will submit that I can't say for sure which is worse. However, the logic still fails. If you lose your leg, let's say to an IED attack while serving, you're not going to blow someone else's leg off for the fun of it, because hey, you lost your leg too, fair's fair.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:06 PM
12

I don't necessarily believe it would be insincere. I believe some people can be shocked into realizing that what they have done was incredibly wrong. A lot of men are quite meek when arguing for fear of having their Anger Management moment, and many people will completely ignore them. But in order to get across how hurt we are, we need to lose it a little bit.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:00 PM
24

Bruce lee isn't going to tell a girl he can't defend himself, That was the whole point you jackass. Most of us aren't Bruce Lee.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 07:12 PM
31

Only Bruce Lee has the possibility of defending himself against a surprise attack like that. The rest of us have to live on planet earth. The guy got struck in the balls, hard. He wasn't acting like a wuss, he was acting like someone who just go sucker kicked hard in the most sensitive place on a man's body. Take your judgementalism somewhere else.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:52 PM
132

A strike to the testes is more painful than childbirth. You need to get mad and tell her, "no, I'm not going to fucking get over it, you need to apologize."
/r/MensRights29/08/21 06:49 PM
2

Canada.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 09:17 PM
1

You are saying that men are the reason No he didn't. I'll repost what he wrote: Universally, man-haters have a legitimate grievance with an individual male. Though I do take issue with his use of the word "universally". I think it's quite possible to become a raging misandrist without having been done wrong by any man. I'm going to grant that a good portion of them have been fucked over by some dude. Then they become a misandrist, while completely forgetting the women that have fucked them over …
/r/MensRights26/08/21 10:29 PM
12

Which is why I generally don't watch anything produced by Netflix. I'm a huge fan of the Jurassic Park franchise, and I thought the Camp Jurassic show would be fun, right up until a female camp counselor felt the need to mock a male counselor who had done nor said anything wrong by accusing him of "mansplaining". I turned it off immediately. If you unironically use sexist feminists buzzwords that put adjective "man" in front of a derogatory term, you're a piece of shit and I'm done with your sho…
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:22 PM
1

Where and when was this?
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:49 PM
43

LAWSUIT.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:38 PM
1

Then go on a night that's not a lady's night.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:19 PM
1

I'm ok with it. The objective isn't to be discriminatory, it's not done out of hatred for men, it is as you say sound business strategy. But what's the alternative? Women get no free drinks, and no discounts on entry fees, and we get bars and clubs with very few women in them? I think I'll keep the current paradigm.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 11:15 PM
4

I don't hate the police, I just have my eyes open regarding the misconduct of some of their numbers.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 09:38 PM
8

I'm some 'woman who's brought here by a rich man'. Well, even if that were true, it's none of their business.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 09:01 PM
6

I wonder what the statute of limitations on this sort of abuse is. Because the police need either a warrant, or probable cause to pull you over, and no having a minor female in your car is not probable cause.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:59 PM
22

I remember a while ago there was a post here about a woman who posted this phrase to FB and had her BF immediately break up with her, something she was not expecting.
/r/MensRights23/08/21 08:08 PM
9

From one conversation with one of the girls I really like it turns out she thinks it's weird men are so horny. Perfectly natural thing, it IS weird and can create awkward situations or even worse. It most certainly is not "weird", it is what it is. And women who think this way are doing immense damage to male/female relations. So... What am I supposed to do? Move on. There are 3,499,999,999 other women in the world, some of whom do understand the sexual impulses of men, and who do want cuddling.…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 10:18 PM
2

"You're a man, you wouldn't understand" "I'd never leave my kid with a man" Went to her facebook page, sure enough the feminist fist symbol proudly displayed in the background.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 10:26 PM
4

BelieveMen when they say they didn't do it.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:58 PM
1

If I was capable of autofellatio, I can promise I wouldn't stop.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:35 PM
10

I wonder if people in other countries think election fraud only happens in the US. Because I would not be surprised if he got there that way.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:25 PM
1

TBH, I'd rather have the Megalomaniac.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 10:24 PM
1

It's more than that. Even the bridge trolls seem to get the pussy pass, but not quite as much.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:17 PM
1

I have an unshakeable religious faith in it.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:16 PM
0

Being sexist against women by only buying from male employees will not help the cause. We don't need that shit here. I'm actually debating reporting you to the mods for it, that's how much it disturbs me.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 08:20 PM
1

We, MRAs. If what you want is Handmaid's Tale brought to life, then GTFO of here, you're not one of us.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 10:20 AM
5

No actually I haven't. For pretty much all of human history the pendulum has been on the woman's side. I'm not a vindictive person, so I'd rather not see the world go all Handmaid's tale. Which means it is of utmost important that we try to remain as rational and objective as we can.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:47 PM
3

Then they are discriminating.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 10:02 PM
-1

Young and naive, and just wanting some party money? Nah.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 10:01 PM
3

I worked at such a shop. IDK if they didn't hire women (for the shop floor, the office was all women) or if women just took one look at the place and noped out, but there wasn't any women on the shop floor.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:59 PM
11

That's wrong. We want the pendulum to stop in the middle, not all the way our way.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 09:57 PM
1

False equivalencies are false. Correct me if I'm wrong, but women do have all of their organs at the end of a pregnancy.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:20 PM
2

Failing to see how this trumps RIGHT TO LIFE.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:50 PM
1

Failing to see how this trumps RIGHT TO LIFE.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 10:50 PM
2

But he just wanted a drink of water! /s
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:40 PM
2

Like I said, if the 6'5 dude isn't doing anything threatening, and just being in a place he shouldn't be, you can't do anything to him, except call the police to have him removed. Even damaging property you're not allowed to shoot him. You're only allowed to shoot if he's threating innocent life.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:34 PM
2

Isn't that still legal? Not sure. But all signs point to this being a bad idea. So far the only way I've found to get a trespasser off your property is to call the police.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:22 PM
2

Sorry pal, it isn't. Heck, you're not even allowed to physically force someone off your property. If someone is trespassing and you want them gone, you have to call the police. You're only allowed to shoot if your life, the lives of your family members, or of an innocent stranger is in immediate jeopardy.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:17 PM
2

Maybe it's time men simply learn the art of the bluff. If you know you're innocent of the crime you're being accused of, simply tell the bitch you have video.
/r/MensRights15/08/21 08:14 PM
3

That's not the equivalent of pregnancy.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 10:00 PM
-3

There are plenty of things we force people to do. And when the choice is between killing someone's child, or making someone go through 9 months of uncomfortableness, well...
/r/MensRights14/08/21 07:54 PM
6

The hard time of a pregnancy does not mitigate the fact that is still half his.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:38 PM
13

Women going through the hard time of a pregnancy is not nothing I will grant you that, but the point still remains. It is still half his child, and I would think you would want a say in whether or not someone ends your son's/daughter's life.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:37 PM
17

Feminism is the fire that must be put out before we can rebuild the house (Fair treatment and justice for men)
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:33 PM
3

Well, to be fair, we are trying to cancel Amber Heard.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:23 PM
1

Let's go ahead and consider the infuriating fact that the nursing home murders aren't a thing big enough to take the man down, but a little grabass, is.
/r/MensRights14/08/21 06:13 PM
17

If she can say that, you can be rest assured that she's never been actually raped.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 09:53 PM
3

If only...
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:32 PM
6

Except there was this: "Men don't "support" their wives..." It was reductive. And the rest of that comment was inflating women's contributions. Don't get me wrong, their contributions to the family unit are valuable, but that whole comment stunk of "Men are just career obsessed buffoons who just want to drink beer and watch monday night football while the poor wife scrubs the floors on her knees."
/r/MensRights10/08/21 11:07 PM
10

Regardless, the response to whatever the comment was, was incredibly reductive of the man's contribution to the family. Which is what I took issue with.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:40 PM
6

The very first thing on the list was feminist clap trap. Men don't "support" their wives who stay at home to raise their children. Women support men's careers by providing unpaid childcare, housework, meals, and overall family life management services. Let's unpack that shall we? Women support men's careers Let's be real. Most men don't have "Careers". They have jobs, that they hold down to support their families. And frankly it's this kind of bullshit wording that judges worldwide use to justif…
/r/MensRights10/08/21 10:32 PM
1

Too late, it's already Wednesday. Well that's what I would say if I were a level 3 wizard.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 09:12 PM
1

Jason Momoa, and Chris Hemsworth would get a pass, naturally.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 11:18 PM
1

It would be lost time. One second it would Tuesday, and the next Wednesday.
/r/MensRights09/08/21 11:14 PM
18

We don’t make apologies for the robber and say we should be glad to help them out. Well, ackually...
/r/MensRights09/08/21 08:28 PM
1

You're lost if you have to ask this question.
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:57 PM
1

Stopped reading after: "First, it ignores trans women and assumes that only men can have penises."
/r/MensRights08/08/21 02:47 PM
1

It's from Shakespeare. The full quote is "Methinks he doth protest too much", which basically means overcompensating, being defensive, etc.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 09:18 AM
1

Ah, so we're into "Doth protest too much" territory then.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:30 PM
29

I have one gay friend who for all intents and purposes is a regular guy. No stereotypical exaggerated effeminate gestures, no style sense, nothing. Kicked my ass in UT2004. The thing that made him gay? Quote "I just like cock".
/r/MensRights04/08/21 10:04 PM
-1

Fuck protected classes. It's what assholes say when called out on their bigotry.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 09:13 AM
9

I see bigotry is still alive and well.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 11:53 PM
2

Point being, you being from out of state had nothing to do with why you targeted. People like the person who called the fuzz on you exist everywhere. And maybe the original guidance wasn't necessarily directed at you, but at any man who might experience a similar situation.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:35 PM
2

You don't have nosy morons in your home state?
/r/MensRights02/08/21 09:31 PM
3

You have the right to face your accuser. Insist on it next time and give the idiot a good tongue lashing for being such a bigot.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:54 PM
6

Well there was that one African woman who was ready to go to war with white people because she believed she could call lightning.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:08 PM
3

single mothers And you do realize that most of them single by their own choice? And the rest of don't particularly enjoy supporting other people's children. Women have choices. They can 1: Be more discriminating in who they open their legs for. 2: Don't kick your child's father out of your's and your child's lives. 3. Have an abortion. (Though I personally don't particularly care for that option.) 4. Give the child up for adoption. 5. Find a captain save-a-ho. 6. Abstinence 7. Birth Control. 8. …
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:05 PM
15

Obvious troll is obvious.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:50 PM
0

Gotta love that fallacy. Not all sexual assaults are equal, and some are less severe. Butt slapping is one of the less severe.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:46 PM
0

Did you miss the part where I said it was rude? It's still a crime, but it seems to me like you want to see guys drawn and quartered for it.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:27 PM
0

I didn't say they should. I did, because it didn't really bother me that much. But if you're offended, sure say something or dump a drink on her.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 07:26 PM
-7

Then maybe not slap someone's butt without their consent?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:21 PM
1

I tip my hat to you sir.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:39 AM
1

So I have no problem with posts suggesting men are trying to be more understanding and willing to help with female issues. Except they're asking for our help with female non-issues.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:00 AM
-20

And that's ok. But grounds for wasting taxpayer dollars and the court's time and energy? Nah.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:39 PM
-33

A guy slaps a girl's butt, he should get a drink in the face. I got my butt slapped, and I laughed it off. It didn't really bother me.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:27 PM
2

Karl Marx seemed to think feminism was a part of socialism: "Anyone who knows anything of history knows that great social changes are impossible without feminine upheaval. Social progress can be measured exactly by the social position of the fair sex, the ugly ones included," Karl Marx.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:11 PM
1

I despise both feminism, and socialism. Where does that leave me?
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:07 PM
26

I'm gonna disagree with you. A butt slap, while rude, when done to either sex just doesn't seem like something that needs the courts involved. If you slap someone's butt and end up with a drink poured on you, justice served, end of story.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 11:00 PM
3

I'll never forget the time Dr. Laura told some lady to feel on her husbands dong while he was sleeping, if he was hard, he wasn't cheating, "because every 90 minutes while sleeping men become erect, and women lubricate".
/r/MensRights29/07/21 11:18 PM
1

That moment when I don't know if someone is a male/female, it has nothing to do with transgenderism.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 08:04 PM
6

Men shouldn't have to pay maintenance, and since I believe in equality, neither should women. So no, I don't believe she should have to pay this.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:32 PM
18

He/she doesn't agree with the maintenance order, even with the new information that it won't put her in the poor house.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:30 PM
4

If I were a misogynist like the feminists believe I am, I would be cheering this. But I'm not. Bad for the gander, bad for the goose. It's just as much of an injustice what happened Clarkson.
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:28 PM
1

Ah, I see. My job is 22 miles away. I could drive 8 hours and probably not leave the state.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 11:20 PM
0

No. The circumstances behind his release doesn't vindicate him. It was because of a deal he made, not any actual innocence on his part.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 10:54 PM
2

Your country is that small? I go travel daily from between two counties for work and I regularly reach speeds of 80mph.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 08:59 PM
1

As an apparently attractive guy, I seem to get more compliments from women than the average guy. That having been said, all the compliments I have gotten, were years apart.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 09:37 PM
2

Common law marriage is actually quite rare in the US, thank god.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 09:21 PM
7

A YouTuber named "ExploreWithIndia" did a reaction to this Forest Gump. She's no MRA (Well maybe she is and just doesn't know it), but she really did not like Jenny. Some people do notice.
/r/MensRights24/07/21 02:20 AM
1

Divorce over that? Maybe he's better off, she sounds like a nutcase.
/r/MensRights19/07/21 10:02 PM
2

Well, if she didn't have her fun job she could stay home and contribute by keeping the house clean. But no. That way she can go have her fun job, expect you to cover the household finances, and on top of that since she "works" as well you're also expected to take on a portion of the household chores.
/r/MensRights18/07/21 06:17 PM
1

There's all sorts of scientific discoveries that never see mass usage/production. I wouldn't worry about it.
/r/MensRights17/07/21 08:37 PM
9

Sure. There's a reason the bible mentions whoremongers (Pimps, traffickers) specifically as being hellbound. Me personally, a pimp would hope to never offer me a trafficked woman/girl. They'd never find the body. (of the pimp for clarification) Why do you think the movie "Taken" was so successful? People experienced a whole heck of a lot of satisfaction watching Liam Neeson destroy sex traffickers.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:59 PM
2

Most of us have seen and consumed plenty of media where a "rape" is indeed violent forceful penetration. That is what we think of. The word "rape" has a very dark and negative connotation, expanding that word to cover sex by manipulation waters it down, saps it of it's power to disturb us. Maybe sex by manipulation is wrong, but maybe it's not. I mean, a good portion of normal sexual interactions are manipulative. Women can manipulate men by wearing tight jeans and a low cut top. Men can manipul…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:57 PM
2

Really, I have yet to see any of those comments.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:48 PM
2

Rape culture is this: When the responsibility exists to NOT be raped. WTF kind of logic is this? If women don't protect themselves, then nobody will unless they make sure they're with someone who can protect them. We good men do not have clairvoyance, and we can't fly/teleport. We can't protect a woman from a rapist if we aren't there. No one says “Well… that murder victim must have wanted it otherwise they wouldn’t have been walking in that neighborhood alone” Who is saying this about rape vict…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:47 PM
12

They choose it. Bullshit. They don't "choose" it anymore than a trafficked woman in LA who doesn't know anyone, or any English, and has no skills "chooses" prostitution. They do what they have to to feed their families, and sometimes the only job that pays enough is the dirty dangerous one.
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:08 PM
2

I'd be pissed. I can pay child support, but I can't have my child have my last name?
/r/MensRights12/07/21 08:52 PM
0

I'm not a feminist, nor will I willingly come down to a feminist level. I do not understand how one, justifies their actions and what their saying by "it's fine because they're doing it as well". Well, I wasn't actually trying to justify it. I was more pointing out that complaining about minor sexist offenses, isn't worth it. For it to be sexist, it would have to imply one gender is better than the other. Not necessarily. Sexism without malice is still sexism. Edit: first time hearing the saying…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 08:04 PM
3

We aren't a big evil hive mind. Ironically feminists seem to think you are. They seem to think being a woman also defaults you into being a feminist, hence why the anti-feminism you find lots of here gets twisted into being anti-woman.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 11:49 PM
0

You do realize the irony in this right? Feminists will drone on and on about all the petty sexist things men do, and even unironically called it "microagressions", which I find hysterical. So yes, it is sexist, and no it's not worth getting your panties in a bunch over. And yes that was sexist too. Not worth getting your boxers in a twist over.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 10:53 PM
5

The man hate wasn't the part that failed, it was the justification for it that did.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 09:38 PM
2

Yet more "Life ending asteroid approaches earth, women most affected"
/r/MensRights07/07/21 08:42 PM
1

Yes. It happens. Sitting down at G&L getting ready to dive face first into a juicy doublecheeser, and play with new tablet when this older woman with her son (?) in tow struck up the most awkward convo you can imagine and offered to buy my burger for me. I wasn't interested, but I did find it adorable.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 01:58 AM
3

My problem with cancel culture is the severity of it. Maybe if you were cancelling actual racists/sexists etc. it might be different. But you're out there ruining people's lives who may have made a mistake in the past.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 12:01 AM
-13

Yes, I would.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 01:00 AM
-21

Fairly? Yes, they usually get away with a couple months probation, but 64 to 102 years? Seems like a massive overcorrection to me.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:14 AM
-13

IDK, 64 to 102 years seems pretty extreme. Certainly she should spend some time, but come on, can we have some moderation and common sense?
/r/MensRights01/07/21 12:12 AM
0

Most guys who last, are having sex multiple times a day. I would go back to the pre-game nut.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 10:10 PM
7

Be legit busy, every time she texts.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 10:03 PM
2

Don't do online dating. It's a shark tank. You're better off meeting chicks in person where you can charm them with your personality.
/r/askTRP21/06/21 10:01 PM
3

Given the way he spells "programme" I'm gonna say he's not in the US.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:57 PM
1

"Nephew" is a male child of your sibling. "Niece" is female child of sibling. "Cousin" is an either sex child of your parent's sibling.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:57 PM
17

Is that really a pertinent question? If you don't have a father, then just treat it like any other day. But odds are you at least are friends with someone who is a father, so celebrate it for them.
/r/MensRights20/06/21 09:52 PM
1

Then reply in kind. "No flat chested sorry."
/r/MensRights18/06/21 11:39 PM
2

This is part of the cult of mediocrity. They're threatened by women who keep themselves in shape, so they push that off onto men and declare we're pedophiles for liking them.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:34 PM
2

We aren't talking about those men though.
/r/MensRights18/06/21 03:32 PM
4

Losing an argument with a man? Just kick him in the crotch, it's totally OK, doesn't matter if he deserves it or not. Everyone will be laughing so hard they forget what an asshole you are.
/r/MensRights17/06/21 09:36 PM
6

Women are truly trash. No. Modern society is trash. There are plenty of women who don't make jokes like this. Stop using the broad brush.
/r/MensRights16/06/21 11:01 PM
1

Had a drunk women I was unattracted to put my hand on her breast.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 08:50 PM
1

Replicators.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 05:03 PM
1

The stupid thing is, the vast majority of us actually don't want to get our one night stands pregnant. So much so that it became a running joke in popular media. So for them to push this as something only males do, but not women, is balls out, explicit misandry.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 09:14 PM
1

Without modern society, there would be far more work to be done. Sun up to sun down, feeding the animals, chopping wood for the winter, harvesting the grain....
/r/MensRights14/06/21 08:01 PM
1

What don't you understand? Job says you have to work this day, and if you don't you lose your job.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 07:28 PM
1

Who said it was 17th century Salem? Every day here there's someone posting about some female teacher sleeping with a male student, and raging about the lenient punishments they are getting. Taking advantage of your station Is that what it is? Are you suggesting that they are blackmailing these boys somehow? Because I highly doubt that. And the punishment should be much more than an apparent stern talking to. Sure, but not the 15 year prison sentences being floated. 90 days in jail would be accep…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:59 PM
1

People who sleep with minors are assholes who should be punished some kind of way, but this isn't 17th century Salem. The punishment should fit the crime, and in this case the crime isn't rape, whether the perp is male or female.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:44 PM
2

You don't have to remind me. 😒
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:43 PM
2

I realize that, but scientific studies have been done and found out that most rape is indeed about getting sex.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 06:29 PM
0

That's bullshit. Just because someone is good-looking doesn't mean they can't be scum. I didn't say that. What I did say was, being good looking decreases the likelihood they need to rape to get laid. They're still capable of it, and given they could probably get sex with decent looking women, and still choose to rape, would them even worse. And I know people who are very good looking but are very rotten inside. We all do. And there plenty of other awful things they can do that are not rape.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:37 PM
0

Then we're talking in two different dimensions. When I say a woman is to ugly to rape, the rape that I am talking about is the legit, visceral definition of rape, where he used his physical strength to overpower her and have vaginal intercourse with her against her will. What you're talking about is the legal/technical pedant's definition of rape. Whereby an attractive teacher says "Hey let's fuck" to a post pubescent teenage boy, and he says "sure" like any post pubescent teenage boy would. Is …
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:13 PM
-5

raping kids You're talking about the teachers sleeping with their adolescent students? Calling what happened there "rape" is a stretch.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:06 PM
4

Because generally speaking, if she's ugly, you'd think nobody would want to touch her. And if he's attractive, he wouldn't need to rape.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:17 PM
6

I've seen wording like "They can" all throughout the article. And I've seen movie after, after TV show where the husband is lambasted for being a "workaholic". And there are the countless women who divorce their husbands because he works too much.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 03:15 PM
2

To feminists, be "tough" means to be anti-man, and you must be constantly challenging the men around you. Real "tough" women stand up to whoever, gender notwithstanding, and don't feel the need to challenge men everyday, only the bad ones who are actually being assholes.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 10:41 PM
0

That sounds an awful lot like "N**s, gonna be n**s".
/r/MensRights12/06/21 10:35 PM
191

"Have more time to focus on their jobs" Dear god the way they twist wording. They work long hours and these assholes act like that's what they wanted, that their bosses gave them a choice. Do these assholes think I feel fortunate that I "get to" work every fucking weekend? Do they not understand the concept of mandatory overtime?
/r/MensRights12/06/21 10:11 PM
1

IDK what you're talking about. There are millions of arrests every year of young men acting up, the vast majority of them do not get shot. Police are not "very quick" to the pull the trigger. And they won't be when all you're doing is trying to buy some fucking milk.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 09:14 AM
12

Feminism is left wing. Find a feminist, start a discussion about something not related to gender issues, IE guns, taxes, welfare, etc. You will find clear left wing biases. In fact, I challenge you to find any feminist that supports firearm ownership, the one thing that does actually level the playing field between men and women, even firearm ownership for women only they are against.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:52 PM
23

Hey, Vice, the words "feminism" and "women" are not interchangeable. Therefore loathing of feminism =/= loathing of women. The title of your article is cancer. And apparently the content.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:45 PM
3

Societal demonization of masculinity.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:42 PM
5

In this country we take possession of CP incredibly seriously, for good damn reason. Actual children are hurt in the process, and possessing it increases the demand for it and causes more children to be hurt. It doesn't matter why you possess it, whether for your own personal consumption 🤮, or to use against your enemies, you are absolute scum for it. These people should be in jail.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 11:01 PM
5

So why aren't they banned? Hell, why aren't they wearing orange? THEY ARE IN POSESSION OF CP.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:57 PM
1

Chalk up another one for the Streisand Effect.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 10:56 PM
1

so in the case that this policy becomes institutional the government wouldn't hesitate to use lethal force to stop civil disobedience. What government are you talking about? It would hesitate. Especially considering the anti-police environment we are currently in.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 08:12 PM
1

That part did not escape me. I still say it's not men's right related.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 09:49 PM
5

Not men's rights related.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 07:46 PM
1

They can then say all stores are closed to single males unaccompanied without women They can try, and I tell you, I'm resolved to civil disobedience in this case, and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone. You tell me I can't shop without a female chaperone? Fucking stop me.
/r/MensRights09/06/21 07:41 PM
9

Does a clinic geared towards women hurt men in any way? Does the concept of discrimination give a fuck? Hoot and holler and carry on about discrimination against minorities, then turn around and engage that very practice. Not very mensch of you.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 10:01 PM
20

This is completely asinine. They are talking about this vaccination center like it's some kind of club. It will offer a private space for women to have their vaccination among other women from their own communities. Why does it matter if there are other women (or men) from your community or not? Are you going to have tea and crumpets afterward? You go in get your shot and go. Never minding that it's actually racist. What if white women wanted a safe space for white women? You'd call that racist.…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 09:55 PM
13

I take the opposite side to this. I've had "inappropriate" interactions with lots of different women, and I never found any of it to be particularly traumatic. For a woman to be traumatized by some of the more petty actions, she would have to already view the world through misandry colored glasses.
/r/MensRights08/06/21 08:36 PM
1

I do not need to butter up my wife for anything. Well, I was referring to BJs specifically. I suppose the act can be arousing for some of the women who perform it, but from my research, most would rather not. Sex on the other hand, women can get something out of it. It is the prostitute's decision to charge money that makes otherwise legal sex into a crime. Yes, but would the sex have occurred without the bill? How can you criminalize someone receiving a bill they did not want for an otherwise l…
/r/MensRights08/06/21 12:38 AM
2

Do you, or do you not support the "Punish the buyer only" paradigm? It's a yes or no question.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:26 PM
2

Am I correct in assuming you support "punish the buyer only" paradigm, "Because innocent women gets forced into prostitution".
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:19 PM
1

Because innocent women gets forced into prostitution, and punishing victims is simply braindead. Is it your position then, that all prostitutes are victims of trafficking?
/r/MensRights07/06/21 08:05 PM
2

Sex for free is legal. "Free" sex still has strings attached, even when they say there aren't, there still are. Who is demanding to be charged for it? Why? Well, I assume if they made getting free sex a lot less of a hassle, the demand for pay to play would plummet. However, the effort it takes to seduce some bar slut + risking the pain of rejection, straight up paying would be the more tenable option. Like, are there women out there trying to give men they love blowjobs for free If your name is…
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:59 PM
1

If you listen to what actual sex workers have to say, they hate the "punish the buyer" model as much or more so than the buyers.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:46 PM
2

So I'm assuming you have evidence to the contrary then?
/r/MensRights07/06/21 07:34 PM
1

When they start kicking girls off campus because they look like some other girl's high school bully, then I can agree with you. Women are horrible to each other, but strangely they only seem to get triggered by men.
/r/MensRights07/06/21 01:12 PM
4

Considering that a Canadian court ordered a man to pay his ex-girlfriend that he had no children with, and never lived with $50,000/yr, the court may not see it that way.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 11:22 PM
1

We have to even have this conversation?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:40 PM
1

So he can get a coercive control charge tacked on?
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:27 PM
3

Except you know that won't work. The court will tack on some kind of coercive control charge if he gets the utilities shut off, that's assuming he can if it's not included in the rent.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:25 PM
6

Having you been living under a rock? This shit has been happening for decades, it's a well known phenomenon. Couple ends up in big fight for whatever reason, woman is hitting man, man calls police, woman summons crocodile tears, tells police false narrative, police haul man away without listening to a word he has to say. Judge grants restraining order without any evidence, only the strength of the woman's word. Man is not allowed in his own house. Man finally vindicated at not having been an abu…
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:21 PM
10

Not "no reason", the reason is in your statement. They're taking her side. That's what cops and the courts do.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 10:08 PM
8

Though, you know full well, if it was your girl pulling this idiotic prank while you were the one mopping, and you wacked her with a mop, nobody would be laughing. Your ass would be sitting in a jail cell.
/r/MensRights06/06/21 03:59 PM
1

I'm sorry for their loss, but that's idiotic over-sensitivity. Like the time they barred a student from certain of classes, not because he did anything wrong, but because he looked like the man who had raped one of the female students there.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:56 PM
2

but then i saw a girl making a shitfuck on the tv bcoz her grandfather did similar things to her and she considered it to be sexual harassment. And that makes her an uptight bitch. Two wrongs don't make a right. It's also one of the mainstays of men's rights, we're tired of women turning every little petty infraction men do into "muh sexual harassment." Don't be the male version of this.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 08:07 PM
3

If it's not sexual in nature, then it's something you need to get over. One of the most important things in the life of humans is physical contact with other humans. When you can get over it, and learn to enjoy platonic touching, you'll find your mental health improves greatly.
/r/MensRights03/06/21 08:11 PM
3

I'm willing to bet, however, that she's referring to abortion, I'm 99% sure that's exactly what they are referring to. They are worried about their "Reproductive health" or their "feminine rights", is just weasel wording for abortion. And her guy friend is wrong. Abortion is very, very close to being on the chopping block.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 07:40 PM
7

Never forget that feminists project. That is not a problem for me. Feminists are the masters of projection.
/r/MensRights02/06/21 12:18 AM
3

I mean, the OP most of those would in fact acceptable examples of misogyny. Now the real question is, how many of us are guilty of any of them? And then of course there's the picking the speck from your neighbor's eye while you have a plank sticking from your own. All of the things on that list can be flipped and applied to misandrists as well.
/r/MensRights01/06/21 10:02 PM
4

And your teacher exposed her anti-male bias. The real reason girls do so much better than boys in school? Is because they're propped up by their teachers. Peer reviewed study found that teachers, when the grading was subjective gave higher marks to girls, for the same quality of work. Give artificially higher marks to girls, then tell boys they're stupid. Tell me that isn't wicked.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 01:37 AM
5

For a while in my state, we had something called "Driver responsibility fees" where the state would tack on another $200-$2000 depending on what your offense was. And being behind on those fees meant having your licenses suspended. Needless to say, that was ended after about 10 years being on the books.
/r/MensRights29/05/21 10:45 PM
3

If rape was legal and accepted by society, and women quietly accepted their fate, most men would rape. Bullshit. Men still have empathy. Men do not want to harm other people, and if rape was legal, most of us still wouldn't do it. Now sure, rape rates would skyrocket, but that would only be because the few of us who are inclined to rape would do it a lot more often.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 08:26 PM
-1

Depends on the context. If you're giving a scientific lecture using the word "female" is appropriate. However, if you're just an average guy ranting about women, saying stuff like "These females out here be triflin'" It is a little disrespectful. And frankly, I don't understand why we can't just say "women", to me pronouncing the word "female" takes more effort.
/r/MensRights27/05/21 01:41 AM
6

A member of the legacy media doing something shady? Say it aint so!
/r/MensRights21/05/21 08:04 PM
2

I hate to say this, but it's possible your brother is guilty. 1 accuser, could be a false, but your brother has 2. Are his ex's friends with each other? If so, that could explain why 2 of them are accusing him, if they are collaborating.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 11:44 PM
9

Oh right, now its "equity" Except, that isn't even the case anymore. In the places where they have reached this magical equity, they're still pushing favoritism of women.
/r/MensRights20/05/21 12:38 AM
13

Especially when actual pedophiles are rare.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 08:41 PM
3

Start an anti-woke publishing company.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 08:33 PM
3

including cross-examinations Yeah, I'm not exactly sure how that's supposed to take pressure off the victim. It is the opposing attorney asking these questions, correct? This person is still going to be quite intimidating.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 03:34 AM
1

I know there was a bunch of talk about misogyny being a hate crime in Great Britain, but not here in the states. It would run afoul with most of the civil rights lined out in the constitution, so not even the stupidest congress member would try it. And believe me, that's a pretty low bar.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 11:44 PM
1

It does happen from time to time that judges will order an ex to communicate with you in regards to your child.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 10:56 PM
2

Although some people might claim that a woman withholding sex might be selfish, I'm not one of them. However, both men and women have needs, and if their needs (sexual) aren't being met by their partner, they have a right to leave (within reason). It doesn't have to be a dig on the underperforming partner, they just had mismatched libidos.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 10:34 PM
1

Well, you should have been calling her exgf in this post. Dump the bitch immediately not only is she crazy jealous, she's abusing you, time to move on.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:31 PM
1

Ask them if they like what they see, and are just recording for fap material.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 11:24 PM
2

You're an idiot. If someone calls you a creep when you're not one, it's far worse.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:18 PM
3

You can't see how being called a creep can be hurtful?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 08:06 PM
5

I'm not attacked by women being harassed by creeps. I'm attacked by the term being thrown around willy nilly over every slight grievance. And do I get to use your logic about women being sluts? They don't like the term slut being thrown around willy nilly, so they must be one, right?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:59 PM
2

There is nothing in that statement that sounds like a creep. You can go away now.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:34 PM
13

Where did you get the idea that I can't get a partner? I never said I was unattractive. I'm just a realist who hates dated cliches, especially ones that do nothing to help my less genetically blessed brothers.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:29 PM
6

I'm not, and have never been considered one. Course that might have something to do with my good looks.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:22 PM
6

You didn't choose to be autistic, so no. You can stop being an MUS anytime.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:13 PM
9

No the cliche is that being a good person is what attracts women. It might be the difference between two good looking men, but surprise, surprise being attractive is what attracts women.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 06:12 PM
7

Syndrome. IE not something to be proud of. IE, you're an asshole.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:21 PM
5

See, what you have is what I call Male Unicorn Syndrome. IE you think "I'm the only good one, the rest of you are animals".
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:13 PM
8

So, you can't be a misandrist?
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:01 PM
3

It does tend to get thrown around a lot, at inappropriate times. It does have a valid usage. But just saying you find a particular female youtuber attractive is enough to get some retard to use it.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 05:00 PM
17

Downvoted for the Disney fantasy cliche.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:55 PM
5

Except that doesn't always work. I've had it happen multiple times where girls completely ignore me, don't even look my way, but when I said hi to them (Not to hit on them, just being friendly), I got an overwhelmingly positive response. Welcoming body language, big smiles. A lot of women are plenty interested, but don't show it.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:53 PM
16

It's stalkerhysteria. Actual stalkers are rare, but try and get them to realize this.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:28 PM
3

I can't remember the last time I heard any guy call a woman he finds unattractive, or any woman for that matter, "creepy".
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:22 PM
5

Let’s just pretend, for a moment, that the men and women guilty of this behavior aren’t programmed from birth to believe that beauty=integrity. There's no pretending. People don't have to be taught how to be assholes, they can figure that shit out all on their own.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:10 PM
12

Sounds like something a misandrist would say.
/r/MensRights16/05/21 04:09 PM
2

If I love her and care about her, and if she tends to forget those things, I fuckin will. But your smarmy tone is not lost on me, so go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 10:11 PM
2

Adults never forget things? And they never do things for other adults? Good god, I'd hate to be an adult in your world, with those expectations.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:42 PM
1

I think you already know the answer to your question. You're a great BF, don't the haters gaslight you into believing otherwise.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:39 PM
3

Top left is kind of "woof", bottom right is fairly attractive, the other 2 are kinda "meh".
/r/MensRights15/05/21 09:00 PM
4

Fair treatment in divorce/family courts. Ending the constant demonization of men, and the automatic assumption of ill intent. Less discrimination against men all around. IE affirmative action that grants some lesser qualified women positions vs qualified men, breast cancer and prostate cancer kill about even numbers of women and men respectively, yet breast cancer research funding receives 5x gov funding, etc.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:36 PM
2

Can someone elaborate for me? How does being a gang member grant you more phone access in prison? Is it because gangs have phones?
/r/MensRights15/05/21 08:07 PM
3

Whatever it was, it was very "Has anyone ever been as far..."
/r/MensRights14/05/21 02:09 AM
6

Dude, are you off your rocker? "I'm confused". Well that much I understand, you are definitely confused. I'm not sure who you are arguing with. Nobody suggested shooting feminists. Remind me of why all the guns? Honest question, and I've lived in the USA. Remind me. For self-defense. For defense of the innocent. For defense against possible foreign invasion. So we can't be herded into gas chambers. For target practice. For hunting.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:24 AM
10

Not a good image in the UK. US here. It's simply good fashion not to be shot, dear Chap. Or I'll knock you teeth out. What? What are you saying? Are you drunk? Your statement makes no sense. "Or you'll knock my teeth out" what? For shooting you? For shooting someone else? For carrying a gun? I don't understand.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:20 AM
1

The whole ironic thing about it is that if he had stood up to his wife, and said "no, i'll put the fucking cups where I please" she probably wouldn't have divorced him.
/r/MensRights14/05/21 12:12 AM
13

Not a huge fan, but I do like my Glock 42.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:57 PM
19

Well, there are plenty of non-feminists who would properly train them in gun safety.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 10:14 PM
18

Not surprised.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 09:25 PM
32

Or we could, you know let women arm themselves. The one thing that is proven to reduce rape rates, and that suggestion makes feminists recoil like a vampire in sunlight. I don't think they actually care about women's safety so much as they hate men.
/r/MensRights13/05/21 08:27 PM
1

Yet again, you're talking about the minority who post about it
/r/MensRights13/05/21 02:09 PM
1

But to every sex less male, there is going to be a sex less female who is a bit awkward etc. If you had any understanding of gender dynamics, you would realize how absurd this statement is. No, there is not a sexless female for every sexless male. No one hates people purely because they are virgins. I think it's more to do with how they feel about themselves. The massive number of people online who use the term "Virgin" as a slur would seem to say otherwise.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 09:07 PM
2

Well for one thing, prostitution is illegal in the US, so going to see one is a huge risk, risk of getting caught, STDs, getting robbed, or scammed. And then it isn't only about the sex, they also need to feel loved, you don't get that from prostitutes. You're acutely aware that any affection they show you is tainted by the fact that you paid them. Then of course there's the social taboo of being caught as a John. And they themselves may just have their own compunction against it, they may feel …
/r/MensRights12/05/21 05:11 PM
2

A friend of mine died in jail because of a false accusation of possessing child porn.
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:50 AM
3

Because the people that get falsely accused are all billionaire presidential/supreme court candidates, right?
/r/MensRights12/05/21 01:49 AM
2

so i’d love for that to be less normalized. If it were, there would be something to fight. Unfortunately it isn't, some men just act like pigs, society doesn't teach them to what they do, they just do it. So you end up with a situation where the only men who would listen to a lecture about bad behavior, are the ones who don't behave badly anyways. And they get frustrated and insulted. Especially when they see those badly behaving men getting the women they want. Part of the problem with badly be…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 11:33 PM
5

And there a whole lot more out there who don't blog on the internet, who suffer quietly, and then often commit suicide. They don't deserve to have their misery turned into a slur.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:54 PM
7

Incels actively blame women All incels? In the philosophy world, that's what's called a hasty generalization. Incel is not a club with a secret handshake and pointy hat and cloak. And incel is simply a person (male or female) who for whatever reason can not find a sexual partner. They are at their core a downtrodden group. And it's quite disgusting of you to use their descriptor as slur because a few of them lash out at the world. Can't get laid? Let's use the term that describes them as a slur,…
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:26 PM
3

Totally respect that. Out of curiosity, what aspects of feminism do you still support?
/r/MensRights10/05/21 10:18 PM
15

Because most of them don't have anything else going on in their lives, while guys on the other hand have hobbies that are not related to women or attracting them in any way.
/r/askTRP07/05/21 11:44 PM
1

Do you have any evidence for this?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 11:17 PM
2

You have to realize that the majority of people, both men and women are not abusers. If you find a GF, she's probably going to treat you alright. However, the proportion of people who do abuse, is unfortunately large, and the MRA angle is that women have resources to deal with it, while men who are victims often get revictimized by the police in assuming they were the perp. Having a GF can fill a hole in your life, but watch for red flags, have a spine and ditch the abusers before they get their…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 04:05 AM
2

Your neighbor represents Men's Rights?
/r/MensRights06/05/21 04:02 AM
21

... for a few billion dollars. Chump change amirite?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:45 PM
10

You notice the lack of upvotes on the original comment? Don't put that shit on "This sub". He doesn't speak for us.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:16 PM
4

If men could get pregnant, would they suddenly be for it? This is very similar to the anti-gunners who full of smugness post this bullshit: If black people started buying guns, they'd have gun control passed the next day!
/r/MensRights05/05/21 09:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter