TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

noafrochamplusamurai Archive

View 27 posts and 3,351 comments by noafrochamplusamurai on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
128

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/23 04:22 PM
61

Debatenoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:23 AM
41

Debatenoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:58 PM
19

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/21 10:38 PM
16

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/22 01:51 AM
14

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:43 PM
14

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/22 06:53 PM
14

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 01:00 AM
9

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 09:13 PM
8

Question For Womennoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/23 05:11 PM
8

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 07:36 PM
7

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:31 PM
5

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 06:27 PM
5

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/23 12:10 AM
5

noafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 09:42 PM
3

Question For Womennoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:23 PM
2

CMVnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/22 10:23 PM
2

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/21 07:13 PM
2

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 01:13 AM
1

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:01 AM
1

CMVnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate21/01/21 04:25 PM
0

Discussionnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/22 06:20 PM
0

CMVnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/21 10:57 PM
0

Debatenoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 05:22 PM
0

CMVnoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/23 05:51 PM
0

Debatenoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:55 AM
0

Debatenoafrochamplusamurai/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:48 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 3,351 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Nope, only 27% start on apps https://www.theknot.com/content/online-dating-most-popular-way-to-meet-spouse
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 12:48 AM
1

No they haven't,offline has a plurality. https://www.theknot.com/content/online-dating-most-popular-way-to-meet-spouse You're mistaking the largest single vector which is dating apps, accounting for 27% of relationships. Which means 73% meet through offline interactions. Peer Group, which a plurality of friends in common,school,work, and social setting,and social network. Account for 55% Dating apps will never be the way that most people meet, in fact dating apps usage is in decline. The reality…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 02:20 PM
-1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 06:37 AM
0

You guys always pick the wrong places. Dive bars are where the women go after they reach 22. The issue you're going to run into,is that you have to be interesting, and that requires the "P" word you all hate so much. I know it works because I've been able to de- incel a guy. He didn't change his looks, nor his style. The only thing he changed was his approach to his personality, which he improved, and then started getting attention from women. It wasn't easy for him, and it took him over a year,…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:54 AM
6

1 million is a lot, but there's around 4.5 billion women on the planet. Compared to that, 1 million is a less than negligible number. The amount of women that prefer to be alone isn't significant enough to cause a difference in the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:40 AM
5

Most relationships start from peer groups, not from apps, so that proves offline is the better avenue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/26 04:36 AM
2

It's also largely driven algorithm primed to increase response bias. Meaning that it purposefully pushes content to people that disagree with something the most.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 07:51 PM
5

I don't even tell women what I do, it's not on any of my dating profiles, or even in real life until after I know them a bit. I use a very generic statement " I work in Healthcare " or "community advocate". I have a great job that other people would most likely brag about. The particular Healthcare sector I work in is lucrative, and has a lot of respect/prestige. I don't want the hero worship ( no im not a doctor) that comes instantly when people find out what I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 07:37 PM
1

You just described arrogance.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/26 12:16 PM
1

You spend too much time thinking about the theory of dating, than being in the field and dating. Being successful with women is easy, you just overthink it. The guys you're referring to, aren't spending that much energy on being a player. The other population of guys that are successful with women aren't either. It's an easy formula, don't be a dick, and know how to communicate with people. I've mentored incels into being able to get attention from women. The biggest obstacle was overcoming thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:09 AM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 09:03 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:28 PM
1

Ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:28 PM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:17 PM
1

You're on a board that is essentially the losers bracket for men. Most men already know this, that's why most men are married, or will be married in their lifetime. The fallacy you have,is the byproduct of falling for the same psyop that they did. Most men aren't angry at women, or blame women for anything. This is overwhelmingly an online social media phenomenon. In public spaces, where people actually interact, men and women get along fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:08 PM
1

Yeah,no. In the last year about 1% of men have paid for sex. That's not plenty of men, that's a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 08:02 PM
3

Yes, and they don't like me because of it. I go even further, because the male loneliness thing is a purposeful lie, it's not real, and not even scientifically possible. It was doctored specifically to trend on SM. Reddit isn't real, most people have never used it. Social media algorithms are tuned for response bias, optimized to push divisive content because it drives engagement which increases ad revenue. Men hate women, as much as women hate men. Which is to say, that the perceived hate doesn…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 07:55 PM
2

Hey, social media is not indicative of real life. The loud minority of men that screech about pair bonding, and hypergamy on here are a subset of a subset of the population. Something to think about, if you're in the U.S. Most adult men are married, of the ones that aren't married, they will be by the time they're 30. This board isn't real life. Their opinions are about as heavy as the air in your lungs. They aren't real, they're NPC's that you can't even interact with in game.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 06:43 PM
5

You still think in binary terms, casual sex still has intimacy. It's a different kind of intimacy than that of one born from long term building, but in its way, can also fill your cup. Real life example: I walked into a local bar for a last call drink. Ordered my drink, chatted with a guy I knew that decided to buy a round of shots for the people he was with, wanted me to join in. Had a brief conversation exchanged numbers with a woman. Then left to go home , got a call basically as I was walkin…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 06:32 PM
1

The guys that complain about betabuxxin, are the same guys that got skipped over in their 20s. Like the older women that don't change, there are men that also get stuck in the same feedback loop.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 06:12 PM
3

As a middle aged man I can tell you that it's not a majority share of young women chasing after players. Despite the lip service. Women, just like men, do not really change that much as they get older. 2 things happen. Women become more commitment phobic as they're older. Despite what the vocal minority of men on this board believe, women become more desired as they get older, so they have more options. Of those options, they still fall victim to the trends of men they chased in their 20s. Most …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:48 PM
2

Preach! Social media isn't indicative of real life. Especially on a niche subreddit that's algorithm boosted for response bias.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:38 PM
12

A person that has done internal questioning of their beliefs. Then authentically derived a new synthesis of thought reflective of a change in mindset, and living. Is truly a better being than they were before I will also add that what we know now is that there was a decade long psyop run on vulnerable men, especially young men to get them to embrace far right wing ideology to save the GOP. Yeah....it was in the Epstein files leak. Epstein,Bannon et al were pushing this content. He was on 4chan, …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:36 PM
7

Common misconception, you believe that men are sex driven. We are not,we are intimacy driven. The way that we commonly express that intimacy is through sex. I'm not the demographic on this sub that you're used to dealing with. In fact, most of the men that peruse this board are not the caricature strawman that women on here complain about. We're usually just silent, because we don't have anything to complain about. Unlike the loud minority who believe that if they had Elon's wealth, or Clavicula…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 05:21 PM
1

The information literally came out in the Epstein files release. It was a deliberate misinformation campaign by Bannon, and Epstein. Being deceived is painful, and deeply unsettling, but this now in the historical record. The male loneliness epidemic was a lie used to weaponize American politics to get a far right wing agenda in place. It worked initially, but is currently falling apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/26 12:24 PM
1

Women have always, except for a brief period post ww2. Had more degrees than men have. This isn't a new phenomenon, men were still getting married .
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 04:19 PM
4

Men are not significantly more lonely than women in their same age cohort. That was another deception in the story. Female loneliness got minimized, even though the same doctored study showed that most young women were also lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 03:22 AM
13

Hi, old head checking in. I was in the dating market of the late 90s, early 2000s. Got married,then divorced, back in the current market. My dating age range is 25-55. Now that we got the specs out of the way. Dating now, and back then are equivalent. Women today, have the same standards,hangup, and overall opinions of women back when I was in my early 20s. The same can be said of women in my parents generation. Young women liked men with cars,and money. They have always liked edgy dangerous men…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 03:19 AM
0

There is no male loneliness epidemic, it was a psyop run by Bannon,Epstein, and Heritage foundation to get young men to vote for right wing candidates. Bannon, and Epstein had 4 chan accounts and were moderators on the boards, pulling the strings to push content,and ideas that furthered their agenda. They also had reddit accounts. The landmark PEW study that pushed male loneliness to the front was littered with data that was obviously cooked to get an outcome, not collected for actual research. …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 02:47 AM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/26 12:12 AM
5

Something that I think most women overlook: Men are deeply romantic, it will look different than romance in a the minds eye of a woman. We still crave the love story, and the manic pixie dream girl is intoxicating.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:34 PM
0

No, because you narrow your field you increase the amount of quality options. If you have a field of 10 guys, but only 1 quality. Compared to a field of 5 guys, but 2 quality. You've increased your realistic options.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:23 PM
4

It does apply to all, men do the same thing. We date a manic pixie dream girl, then act stunned when she has a manic episode.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 10:07 PM
1

You miss understand the heuristic. The choices aren't less in quality, because there are less numerically, you increase your discernment in making that choice. At 30 yr old. You're going to have a longer list of requirements than you did at 20. So you're going to become picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:55 PM
6

But they aren't good at what they do. Your other female friends will see it, yet women go full steam into it anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:50 PM
5

That's not how it goes, the signs are present in the beginning, they just get ignored because love blinds people. Women will look dumb struck when they leave a relationship because of mental, or physical abuse. The relationship started off as love bombing, and sweet little gestures like showing up when she was out for a girl's night because " I just missed you so much". The personality traits were on display from day Zero. They just fed the ego of the woman that they wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:47 PM
1

Sure, but then you have to add in choice heuristic. The more choices a person has, the more likely they are to make a poorer choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/26 09:35 PM
1

Women have made fake social media profiles as an experiment. The algorithm immediately started sending them women making thirst traps,and women that make sexualized content. Algorithms aren't sorting by themselves. They are programmed to optimize response bias. Think about it, you probably didn't out of your way to find content of Andrew Tate, or any of the other manosphere grifters. Yet you got their content on your feed. People respond to things they dislike. The algorithm isn't passive, if a …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/26 08:11 PM
1

One of the things you really solidifies adulthood, is realizing that drugs are everywhere, and so many people are doing them. Your high school history teach, probably does lines of cocaine on the weekends. If you ever go to a dance club, or EDM festival, there's drugs all around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 03:51 PM
1

Narco trafficking is definitely common in Germany.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/26 12:45 AM
1

It's not just black men, I'm in the U.S, the same thing applies to white guys that are in motorcycle gangs. Italians in the Mafia, Latino men that are into narcotic trafficking. " Bad boy" is a real dating demographic in the U.S, it's one of the leading genres of romance novels.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:53 PM
1

Lol,you make stats mean whatever you want them to mean. Especially when you misquote data, from a poorly done study that was commissioned as a psyop. Show me where, in that poorly done study it says that 60%of men are single,or approach women. Drop the link, I'll wait patiently for you to do so. Spoiler alert: you can't because even though it's a junk study, it does not make the claim you're saying it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 10:13 PM
5

We get more practice than less attractive men, that creates confidence and skill. Would you rather get surgery from a doctor with 1 yr of experience, or 10 years of experience?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 09:29 PM
1

The act of selling ilicit substances is harm.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 09:26 PM
1

No they won't, there is no male loneliness epidemic. That was a psyop to get young men into the alt right pipeline. Kinda like you're doing, except they weren't so obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 08:38 PM
1

No...... where do you think that stuff is coming from? It's still organized crime. Just because Peter picks up from his buddy John doesn't make it less harmful. Whoever John got it from, is connected to a guy that uses a gun to enforce, or secures his territory. The vast majority of illicit substances are connected to a criminal organization that kills people. Peter may not be pulling the trigger, but he's definitely loading the gun that going to be used.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 07:09 PM
1

It's not extremely rare, it's pretty common. So common that as a black guy one of the first things you learn is how to sort out women. One of the quirks of interracial dating, is learning how to filter which women are actually interested in dating a black man, or are they interested in dating their schema of a black man. I'm not an incel, or blackpill. I'm tall, with an athletic build, and conventionally attractive. Getting women has never been a problem, selecting them is. I present as educated…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 07:02 PM
1

Hey, as someone that was born into a criminal family that was about that life. Those things aren't very different, they are the same. They know that it ruins lives, and causes physical harm. What do you think happens when someone owes you money? If they're deep in your pockets, you have to go collect it. How do you think that money gets collected? Selling drugs, is engaging in harm towards people.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:42 PM
2

Quit your bs, 68% of all adult men are married.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:33 PM
7

Good looking men get more practice to be good in bed. Op is completely wrong, the only women that stay with men that aren't good in bad. Are indoctrinated fundamentalists that don't they're allowed to enjoy it, or women that are cheating on their men that are bad bed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/26 06:06 PM
1

In that particular type of crime, you are correct. In all other categories they get a more lenient sentence. This even happen in schools. The discipline gap is a well documented thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 10:34 PM
0

Karla Homulka, she helped her husband rape women, including her own younger sister. They also were a serial killer team. She got a slap on the wrist because a woman couldn't be that evil, and was under the influence of a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 10:31 PM

No it isn't, I've been a parent for 24 years, it has always been expensive. In 2006 I was paying 1500/month for an after-school program that my kids were in for 3 hours a day. Run the inflation adjusted numbers to see what the equivalent is. This idea that it was easier, or better for previous generations to have kids is complete revisionism, and probably a psyop. We currently live in the safest, most secure time in history. Crime is the lowest it has ever been, poverty rates are lower as well. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/11/25 10:30 PM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 01:18 PM
4

My point is that dad's have always been happily participating. The idea of the stoic father that didn't participate in household, and family life was a purposeful lie. A Hollywood fiction that the CIA openly admits that they funded as an Eastern bloc psyop. To show off how much more wealth we had, that women didn't have to work, and men were lord of the manor. The reality is that a large percentage of women worked outside of the home. That's why the term " Latchkey kids" became a thing. We were …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:43 PM
5

Neither, you're operating on outdated pop culture thats never been true https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr071.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 07:00 PM
1

Hey, the modern man doesn't have that expectation, and that was never a reality for men outside of the nobles. People got sold a reality that never existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:45 PM
3

Frugality is a function of means. As your means shift, so does your window of Frugality. If you're making 1k/ week, spending 200 on a TV is frugal. If you make 2k/week, spending 400 on a TV is frugal. Another thing to consider, is that life is about experiences. Subsidizing your kid's passions and core memories is worth the costs. As long as the purpose is for their life enrichment, and not what you perceive to be what they value as life enrichment.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:35 PM
-1

At what point in time were men just check providers, and women were just domestic units? Outside of the nobles? That was never a reality except for for a small portion of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:15 PM
2

More people need to understand this, everything begins and ends with socioeconomic status. For 70 years the CIA ran a psyop on the Eastern bloc nations, which painted the U.S as land of milk, and honey. Overflowing with so much prosperity that only 1 person in the home had to work. They did that by having funding sitcoms, and movies. Shows like The Brady Bunch, Leave it to Beaver, The Cosby Show. It becomes a part of the American identity, so the populace also fell for the psyop. Young women thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 05:05 PM
1

I do not believe that most men blame the actions done by a subset of women, on all women. My statement was unambiguous, the manosphere is an outlier group that represents less than 2% of the male population in the U.S. Statistically, they represent a rounding error.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 10:31 PM
1

So it's a comprehension issue
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:55 PM
2

So you didn't read the entire comment
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 09:16 PM
3

They also associate with millionaires, and average Joe's. They know, and socially interact with more of the latter. I've lived around a lot of wealthy, and ultra wealthy people. Most of the billionaires in the U.S are people you've never heard of.. They're usually nice people, and hang out at local dive bars moreso than ultra lux lounges.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 07:06 PM
3

Couple things, response bias is real. Secondly, do you live in Australia, or Germany?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:56 PM
4

The desire to be a SAHM is in my opinion a black flag. Situations happen where that's appropriate. First few years after childbirth, Illness, taking care of friends or family. If we win the lottery or are born millionaires. In the last 2, I wholly would expect my wife to be active in the community, volunteering, pursuing politics, actively trying to make the world a better place. I want a full partner, not a tax dependent. I'd be doing all those listed, I'd want my partner doing it right alongsi…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:51 PM
2

Here's the difference, women complain about men and blame the whole gender. Men complain about that one woman in particular. Men don't attribute the actions of bad women to the entire population. Caveat applies, the angry person complains more than the happy person brags. So in a niche sub like this, and in manosphere SM. The interactions are going to be coming from upset men, which are fringe. The same applies for the femalesphere. The women listening to Shera 7, and Drew are the upset ones, th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:38 PM
2

Male loneliness isn't real, the groundbreaking study that put the lie of male loneliness was a right wing psyop to get young men into the alt right pipeline. If you read the study you'll quickly see the errors, and how they cooked the stats. I love PEW research, but sometimes they'll have a weird social conservative study that seems to have an Agenda. That's because PEW has ties to the Heritage Foundation, the people who wrote Project 2025. It was a lie that worked. The real world reality is tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:25 PM
5

They don't,because there aren't a lot of billionaires. In reality, most men do get into multiple long term relationships that are gratifying, and they have lots of quality sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:11 PM
4

That's not the reality of most men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 06:08 PM
1

Despite what too many people on here believe,social skills are king. They harp on about wealth and status. Without acknowledging that the overwhelming majority of people with status, got there because of of their social skills. Sure, a gold digger, or clout chaser will go after a status only guy, but that's not the norm. I know guys that have status,and very little social skills. They are struggling to get women,Alternatively all the broke guys I know that have game are in relationships whenever…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:41 PM
1

The existence of hobosexuals nullified your statement
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:28 PM
2

Moves to a new city where he doesn't know anyone. Or, for various reasons no longer able to interact with the friend group that they cultivated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:26 PM
14

Well, there's a large subset of women that like assholes. To those that don't know the difference, and this is pretty common amongst women. Arrogance looks a lot like confidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 05:35 PM
1

Probably did, the difference between you and I, is that I don't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:53 PM
4

So did your mom, and your grandma, we don't care, but you're over here self cucking to the idea that your grandma had a train run on her by The Parliament Funkadellic on there tour in '75.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 05:48 PM
3

2 things I advocate for, going out to make friends, not pickup women. The other is to have platonic female friends. If you go out with intent to catch a vibe, and meet cool people, instead of trying to find your forever person. You'll actually connect with people, and expand your social circle, making new real friends. As an unintended side effect of that, you'll meet some really great dating options. This happens because people get to see a relaxed version of you, and connect with you on a deep…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/25 01:18 AM
1

Im not trying to force anyone to not be in those relationships. It's something I disagree with, and I would never date someone that wanted to be a SAHM, under most circumstances. It doesn't align with my values, but it's ok that you and I have different values. Every person lives their lives to the dictates of their own conscience. Im not trying to convince you to change your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 12:16 PM
1

Absolutely, you're allowed to do whatever you want. Which includes supporting patriarchal standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 11:48 AM
6

Yeah.....so, no. There are still plenty of women that play "damsel in distress". They will downplay their intellect to appeal to men. Tradwife, sprinkle-sprinkle movement are very popular. The largest, and most influential voting bloc in the U.S. White women voted in favor of Donald Trump, and the heritage project at 59% a near super majority. They voted in favor of Gilead because they want to be Serena Joy, when in reality they're going to be Martha's. The cast a vote to be submissive wives, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/25 03:39 AM
1

Settling is a rare occurrence
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/25 03:31 PM
2

The same applies to women as well. Man or woman, we are the common denominator in our dating failures.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 07:51 PM
0

Yep, blame the market, instead of the product that they're putting on the market.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 06:22 PM
6

Nope, 67% of adult men are married, that means that women are picking very average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 04:18 PM
7

Reddit in general, and this sub in particular are not indicative of real life. Asking this sub what X gender prefers. Is like asking a lion why they didn't choose to be a whale. Most of the interaction you're going to get will come from the people that are in the losers bracket in the dating tournament.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:19 PM
3

To be honest, a lot of guys aren't open to accepting advice, or admitting that they are the limiting factor in their dating life.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 03:12 PM
4

You're making a bold assumption that most men don't read the profiles. I hold the opposite view, most of us do read them. If we didn't, then women on the apps wouldn't complain so much about not being able to get the men they want. Out of 100 swipes, with a 45 mile radius, age range of 25-54, I only swipes right about 5 times.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 02:38 PM
1

When definitions shift over time, we use the modern definitions in context to the new time. A faggot originally was a bundle of stick, I bet you don't go around asking people burn a faggot on the fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 02:28 AM
1

Just because they didn't live in multi generational households, doesn't mean it was a nuclear family. They still lived very close to their extended families, and placed a higher value on the extended family, instead of the individual home in which they lived. To go even further, the occupation of the sons, was generally the same as the fathers. If you want to know the European family model was, it was very similar to the Amish.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 01:49 AM
1

No......no it wasn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 12:20 AM
3

Nah, I'm good, you aren't here for discussion. You're here to rage bait.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:11 PM
2

I forgot, you don't participate in good faith on this board. You've contradicted yourself from your earlier rebuttal to my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 04:02 PM
2

That's not in your submission statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:58 PM
1

And the submission statement explaining the thesis goes on to talk about dating someone with a red flag, it never talks about purposefully dating people with asshole character traits. Titles are for click bait to get engagement. The thesis statement, and explanation are more important than the title.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:37 PM
2

Nope, everyone does something that someone else may consider to be a red flag. One of the things I consider as a red flag are women that make a body part the bulk of their personality. Some may consider that as just a woman maximizing her traits. I'm also aware that for a lot of women, me having a lot of female friends is seen as a red flag. While for other women, this is seen as a green flag. These things aren't universal, they're all relative, and based on nuances in lived experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:31 PM
0

That's not what the OP says, it simply states that if you date someone with a red flag, you're morally deficit. It does not say " If you look for specifically, or are drawn to". Which I would agree with. There isn't a person alive that doesn't have a red flag,by the OP logic, we're all bad people.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 03:22 PM
5

Everyone has red flags, so is everyone unfit for partnership?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 02:20 PM
1

One day they'll figure out that it's actually religion that targets redpill men. Particularly evangelical sects.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 02:17 PM
1

There's a fallacy people believe about history. That people were isolated and disconnected. Copper from mines in the great lakes was being traded in Scandinavia. South American gems were being traded in the markets of the Ohio Valley before Europeans knew either continent existed. Alexander the Great had heard about India before he went on his conquest, and was defeated by the king of the Ganges. Chinese farmers taught East Africans how to cultivate rice. The spread of ideas was constant, becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 07:11 PM
0

I have sugar daddy money, and that meme of Sugar you want/ Sugar daddy you get. I'm the first half of that. Beta buxx is the worst thing you can do. If you have to pay for love/sex. Both the product, and the buyer are subpar usually( caveats apply). Do you know what kind of loyalty it's get you? None, because she's still going to fuck the guys she thinks are attractive while you're paying all the bills.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:59 PM
1

It was founded to insure inheritance rights. Throughout history, has inheritance been mostly matrlineal, or patrilineal? How many cultures gave women equal decision rights at a national level historically? How many cultures allowed women to be involved in banking?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 06:36 PM
1

Every system has rules that define them. Patriarchy is basically property/inheritance rights. That's why last names are from the father. Rules also have necessary conditions with consequences. Because your wife has your last name, any children born during that marriage are automatically assumed to be the husband's. If the husband thinks otherwise, he has to prove that it isn't, the mother doesn't have to prove that it is. Even though the system is slanted toward men, there are binding terms that…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 04:09 PM
1

The justification in your comment that you used was that society is used to male violence, and not used to women committing violence towards children. That's very untrue, as mothers are the most likely killers of their children. It's fathers that are less likely to be violent towards their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:31 AM
1

Yes, there's data you're not familiar with. As far as a bias goes, I have none. There's just certain assumptions that we as a society hold, and also lots of junk science, and just bad science that exists in pop culture( ex: the myth of the male loneliness gap is very bad data manipulation) there's also just knowledge gap. As for rates of child abuse/neglect, their are some things that run counter to popular belief, and some things that are misinterpreted. There's the study which found a highly p…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/25 12:14 AM
3

Nice cherry pick of data, men commit more of that sub category. However, who commits more filicides by percentage, total volume, and egregiousness, even when parenting time is considered.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:28 PM
1

Wait until you find out why, spoiler alert: A necessary condition of Patriarchy is infantilizing women. Which takes away their agency, and places them as weaker. That's why in many places the legal wording of laws makes it hard to prosecute a woman for rape. As it is defined as penetration.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 02:08 PM
-1

The same applies for mothers , especially if the child is a daughter.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/25 01:51 PM
1

You've assumed that I don't value character, and that I only go after women that haven't been married. All of those things are not true, and I didn't say any of these women are insane. I stated that their maturity level isn't that different, and the same issues in dating a mid twenties woman, will be the same issues in dating a mid forties woman. It also goes beyond that, I have multiple friend groups of women that have very different Socioeconomic demographics. It's interesting how even though …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 06:37 PM
0

It's not confirmation bias because I'm including the entire data set. I have the same filter for older women, and most of them fail to get to the minimal standards also.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/25 07:18 AM
4

Age and wisdom/maturity aren't coefficients. Here's a conversation that most people aren't ready to have. Most people lock in their maturity during college, and don't change much after that for the rest of their lives. That's why you see people in their 40s that still dress like the early 2000s fashion trends. As someone that has a dating range of 25-55, average maturity of that cluster doesn't deviate much. The difference is usually socioeconomic, the older women have more economic resources to…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:55 PM
2

You and I speaking different languages at this point, there's no longer a reason to continue. We aren't going to agree, and that's OK. If you feel like you need to" win" this exchange, fine I'll let you have the last response.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:43 PM
2

You're somehow still missing the point, everyone can provide insight, but not in the way a friend can. I think this might be a problem for you to understand because maybe you've never had a true friend. You don't seem to be able separate utility, and companionship from men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:20 PM
2

Yes I did specifically in terms of male issues. A random stranger can't provide insights like a man that knows you on a personal level. A woman can't provide that for you
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 07:04 PM
8

Yes, men absolutely need male friendships. No one else can relate to male specific problems. You worry about paternity fraud, are you going to ask a woman about that? They can't understand that issue in the same way another man can. You need to have both male, and female friends. In the order of operations, same gender friendships are more important.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 06:31 PM
1

Monkey branching is never acceptable, and it's a sign that someone isn't emotionally suitable for a relationship. If you need to be in a relationship to feel "whole", you'll never be capable of truly holding up your "half" of the relationship. Relationships aren't always 50/50, sometimes theyre 60/40, or 75/25. If you can't be 100% with yourself, you can't even be counted on to do the 25 in the 75/25 portions of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/25 12:19 AM
5

Honestly, I think lack of promiscuity increases the odds of infidelity. We'll know for sure because people aren't honest about infidelity, which shouldn't be surprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:38 PM
3

The thing is, all the suggestions in this thread are readily available and here right now. Someone suggested " Something like boy scouts".....Boy scouts is here right now, and is losing numbers because people aren't participating in it. The problem isn't lack of institutions, it's lack of not wanting to participate in those institutions. Akin to those saying there's no third spaces anymore. Meanwhile every 3rd place has had a decrease in use because people aren't going to them anymore. I underst…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 08:11 PM
1

Women are socialized within, and also partake in patriarchy. We( all humans) shape patriarchal systems, and they shape us. One of the downsides men face in patriarchy is the necessity for us to always be assumed the aggressor, and ruled by primal instincts. Thus, women are called the "fairer sex". This is done to place a burden of protection for women on men. To serve the overall system in place. As such, the overall default setting is " he did something to deserve that". That infantilizes women…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/01/25 07:57 PM
1

Auto correct hates me
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 10:54 PM
8

No, that hasn't happened, and masculinity isn't demonized. The men that display performative masculinity are still valued and sought after, it's just that you don't understand what traditional male value masculinity really was. I'll give you a hint, it was more Bob Ross, than it was Myron Gaines.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 05:35 PM
2

That's the opposite of my position. My advice is to chase quality, because when you do that the quantity sorts itself out. Your success increases when you go after people that you're invested in. You just need to make sure that you have the qualifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:50 PM
1

That's not how it works, being single doesn't reduce your attractiveness. Pre selection is a covalent to attraction, not a condition of. The second part of your statement defines the differential between success and failure. Lack of self-awareness to identify that the dating market isn't broken, but instead you're offering a sub par product that the consumer doesn't want to buy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/01/25 04:29 PM
1

You actually can, barring some anatomical reasons that may apply. Even some of those might be eased through communication. Have you consulted a gyno, or pelvic floor specialist. Has he been checked for any abnormalities of his penile structure. There are also sex therapists that specialize in these matters. There could also be a psychological issue at play. Most of this can be overcome with communication, that caveat being that both(all) parties involved need to invested in the communication.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 06:00 PM
1

This is a communication issue, not a skill issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 05:32 PM
1

Left leaning women that cheat make sure you have a condom. Right leaning women that cheat are gonna grab your dick and put it in for you. Let's just keep going down the line: Women in relationships are easier to pull than single women. Married men get hit on more than single men. Lastly, and more damning than anything else. Statistically, you're more likely to cheat on your SO, than your SO is likely to cheat on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:58 PM
2

The same applies for the ardent man haters. I'm heavily left leaning in political, and moral thought. However my friend group is politically diverse. It's gotten to the point that I expect every " Girl boss, men are trash, death to patriarchy " performative feminist( heavy on the performative descriptor) to end up dating, or fucking a conservative dude.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:51 PM
2

The couples that choose poly after their relationship started, have a high amount of one of the partners being emotionally manipulated because they're afraid to lose their partner. I know that ethical non monogamy successfully exists, but I've never seen it in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:46 PM
2

Thanks, I love kids and all the things that come with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 04:29 PM
2

Always act from an understanding that pussy is in abundance, never from desperation. Men need to start dating like women. You'll never have as many options as women will, but you still should be just as selective. Pre selection is real, chase quality and quantity will follow.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:51 PM
4

Not the hobby that matters, it the idea that you have a passion for something isn't career related, it shows that you aren't a colony drone bee. I'll put it in context, I have a vibrant social life, with a diverse network of people. My social media footprint is very small, so most people aren't aware of my daily life through that typical lens. Almost 2 years ago I had a surprise son. Just like with my previous children, I deeply believed in connecting them with nature. So him and I would take lo…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:45 PM
1

But not enough to do something about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/25 03:24 PM
6

Each person is responsible for their orgasm. Male or female, if you're not communicating directly what you want, lack of orgasm is on you. For the most part neither side is better at addressing the gap than the other. Men thinking the jackhammer method is top tier sex maneuver. Women thinking that all vaginas are the same, and that men have telepathy. I have literally had the following conversation with an adult female that had at least 10 sexual partners, as we were in a pre coitus make out ses…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:31 PM
2

2 things redux: I'm very familiar with the definition. fag is a bundle of sticks, stick was a slang word for cigarettes. Cheeky Brit humor morphed stick into fag. It wasn't a slur, and wasn't used as one. That definition was never part of American culture. American English,and Brit English frequently diverge due to cultural differences. #2 I literally copy pasted from the Canon of Woke ideology, one of intellectuals that came up with the idea, look at birth date.....it's 1901, and he wrote the p…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:56 PM
2

2 things, in the country of origin. They still refer to cigarettes as a fag, in the U.S. that reference to cigarettes was never a part of the culture. Which brings us to #2, cultural norms dictate social context. As someone from the culture that coined the concept of "Woke" it has always been a term referencing the ability to see the truth behind the ruling powers lies. As referenced in a poem by Langston Hughes: Langston Hughes 1901 – 1967 That Justice is a blind goddess Is a thing to which we …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:27 PM
-1

I was part of a very conservative religious group, I've known plenty of other people from other conservative groups. Game is game, religious ideology doesn't stop women from getting wet.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 10:13 PM
2

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-mating-game/202004/gender-differences-in-casual-sex%3famp According to this study, 78% of adults admitted to it. Another 12% declined to answer.....I think we can extrapolate why that 12% declined to answer. The study also goes on to say that men exaggerate the number up, and women exaggerate the number they have down. Obviously it's because of societal norms, women don't want to be perceived as being easy, so they have more reas…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 07:42 PM
0

Traditional countries is where " Poophole loophole" originated.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 07:25 PM
6

The adoption part isn't bad, not telling me about prior to marriage is bad. It doesn't rise to level of consulting a lawyer to look at divorce options. It moreso speaks to trust. It's the lie of omission, not telling someone a life detail because you don't want to lose moral standing. Is still an actual lie because the truth in totality cannot be discerned. I'm not without understanding, withholding this information is bad, but sometimes lies have a purpose. I would need to know why the adoption…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 07:24 PM
0

I have some bad news for you.....nearly every woman has a casual sex past. The ones that say they do not, are just lying about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 07:04 PM
1

Paralysis by analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 01:16 AM
2

Men aren't hiding there conservative views, women are blinded by love, and aren't paying attention. I live in purplish area, where dating across ideological viewpoints is common. What people say they do, and what people actually do are very different things. Most people are centrists, so being a conservative Republican isn't going to be an automatic disqualifer for most liberal women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 02:49 PM
0

What you're saying is 90% true, you're dead on about Korean 4B, it's unique due to the country's culture, and can't be replicated in the U.S. because women here aren't living under the same kind of duress as they are. The 10% you got wrong is the part about men they aren't sleeping with. There was a call to cancel out their bf/husband's vote. That's because there is a very sizeable population of leftist women that knowingly chose conservative men. We're not going to see a rash of divorces over t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 04:42 AM
5

That's not a tin foil hat, That's literally how they got rid of Roe. Also, in the early 2000s they lost the anti Gay marriage battle because of the Full Faith and Credit clause, and it's been in their crosshairs since.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 02:50 AM
4

Do you know how they took down Roe? It started with Tea party wing nuts submitting bills they knew would get bounced. They kept at it, until the got enough seats. Then once that was achieved, they purposefully passed a state bill that was unconstitutional because they knew it would get challenged, but they also knew they had placed enough justices on SCOTUS to get the win they wanted. This is exactly how they'll do the marriage ban. Here's the other part that you aren't considering. In order to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/24 12:23 AM

Black are not consistently telling other black women to de-center men. Source: I've been black my whole life. The message hasn't been de-center men. It's been make sure you're solid first, and don't be dependent on a man. This isn't a unique phenomenon, patriarchy makes women compete with one another for resources, blk women are not immune to patriarchy, and will thusly kneecap each other for the male attention. If this wasn't true, there'd be no side pieces.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:50 PM

Women are meaner to each other than men will ever be. Social media isn't indicative of real life, women over 30 aren't having a hard time finding men that want to marry them. Stop living your life through Instagram, and instead live in the real world.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:40 PM

Here's the thing, every male minority in the U.S. could've voted for Harris. That still would not have been more votes than the amount of women that voted for Trump. If you look at the numbers between 2016-2024, and look at how they voted. There was a shift, white women voted for Clinton, and Biden, but decided to not vote for Harris. This is definitely on brand if you take history into consideration ( the black codes came into effect after the Civil War largely because white women were afraid o…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:36 PM

You're welcome, I studied polisci in college, and this is something that is widely known amongst that circle. Yet the idea persists that Americans are apathetic about voting. This idea that we don't vote, is a psyop to get us to not vote.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:03 PM

OK, I never said that women need to coddle Trumpers. The entire premise of this post is the opposite of that........
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 09:01 PM

Yeah, if white women would've voted for Harris at the same rate that Latino men voted for Trump, the election would've been very different. Instead they're blaming minorities for a problem that cannot be fixed by minorities. Which is ironically on brand for American politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:59 PM

Okay, so how does that change my argument that identity politics isn't a left only phenomenon?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:49 PM

That's incorrect, the idea that most people in the U.S. don't vote is untrue. In total 66% of the population vote. When you look at only the female population, it rises to 69%, so most women actually vote https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/voters/gender-differences-voter-turnout#GGN
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:47 PM

I didn't change the subject, you just don't have a cogent argument. Women handed Trump his victory,blk men came out in force to support Harris. This is the difference between social media and real life. Paid podcast dudes, do not represent the philosophy of blk men, as evidenced by the way we voted.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:44 PM

No, I stated that the only demographic that voted for Harris at a higher rate were blk women,82% vs 92%.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:40 PM

You claim to not liking identity politics, while MAGA is exactly that. Replacement theory, conservative values, and blue collar working man are the tent poles that have upheld the GOP, the right wing invented identity politics back in the 80s.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:39 PM

Thanks for the clarification
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:33 PM

If every woman voted for Harris, she would be president, but in swing states, most of the women voted for Trump. I don't want a mommy, I want yall to vote in your own best interests, and last night, women did not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:30 PM

https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/voters/gender-differences-voter-turnout#GGN More women vote than men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:27 PM

Nope, that's the scapegoat that they are giving. Sure 60% of Latino men voted for Trump. There are a total of 20 million Latino men in the U.S. Meaning that if all of them voted, it would be 16 million of them would've voted for Trump. There are 110 million white women in the U.S. they are the single largest voting demographic in the U.S. 15% of that demographic would neutralize the Latino vote. In reality, while people are trying to blame minorities( weird, where have we seen thus before) There…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:20 PM

Nope, if I were a woman right now, I would hold a hard line on dating based on how a person voted. If you don't want to protect women's rights, you shouldn't have access to women's hearts. I also believe women should divorce themselves from male validation, and being single should be normalized, not demonized. I'm a 3/4th wave intersectional feminist, and vote accordingly. I also have no problem in my dating life, I don't date conservative women, and that's a hard stop for me. I'm not lacking fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 08:04 PM

Doing the bare minimum......if there were no civil rights movement which was lead primarily by black men, there wouldn't have been a feminist movement. Who supported women at every rung on the ladder? A higher percentage of blk men voted for Harris, than women did. Do yourself a favor, there's a version of man vs. Bear for black women. You should check it out.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:47 PM

If you think an anti dating movement is really going to take hold in the U.S., you haven't been paying attention. Women treat other women that are single like they have some kind of moral failure for not being in a relationship. Most women desire male validation. If you look at the numbers, most women in the 2 largest population zones in the U.S. voted for Trump. Meaning that those voting for Harris were the minority. Personally, I would never date MAGA voter, but pretending like they're the out…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:39 PM

Lol, there was a higher percentage of blk men that voted for Harris, than there were of women that voted for her. In fact, most white women voted to give away their rights. So, which demographic is really deserving of your ew?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:29 PM

Women weren't widely motivated. The largest voting demographic in the U.S. is white women, guess which way they voted? For context, there are more white women in the U.S., than there are BIPOC people combined. If she wanted to, she will
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 07:06 PM
1

Most men are not without love. That Pew study reporting that is hot garbage, they manipulated the data.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 06:58 PM

That would make sense, except for the largest voting demographic in the U.S., mostly voted for Trump.That demographic was white women, who mostly voted to take away their own rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 12:53 PM

Europe already has a problem with fascism, and started going further to the right before the U.S. did.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/24 12:47 PM
3

Guys do approach women IRL. You're living a your life in a user curated echo chamber that tells you women hate men, and that most men are without love. Those things aren't true, neither is this reductionist argument that shy girls have more dating success. The reality is that the extroverted confident women are the ones that have more short,and long term daring success.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 05:49 AM

The Virgin is also going to be easier to pull by a guy out a bar. Also, I'm a fucking adult. I don't want a beginner that gives dry cat tongue blowjobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 03:48 AM
8

Our voter turnout is higher than most countries in the world, this includes countries in the EU. Amongst nations with a high amount of ethnic diversity, the U.S. comes in 2nd place. A couple things to note within your comparison to a civics test. Most classes grade on a curve. With most nations coming in at under 50%, that would push the U.S. firmly into the 80th percentile, which is a B. Also, civics touches on demographics, which would explain why having 66% in an ethnically diverse nation is …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 03:44 AM
20

Most eligible people vote, 66% actually https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/07/12/voter-turnout-2018-2022/ The idea that Americans are apathetic is a psyop to convince you to become apathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/24 06:37 PM
3

Memo from every science class ever: correlation doesn't mean causation. Low T guys can still be in shape physically Some of the biggest simps around are guys with High T.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/24 05:53 PM
1

A single woman at any age still has her pick of the litter within her age cohort. So yeah, a 35 yr old still has the same options as a 20 yr old woman. Men prefer women that are also in their same age cohort. Some of y'all really need to stop listening to podcasts,and actually go experience real life. Older women aren't struggling in the dating market for the attention of marriage minded men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 12:39 AM
1

Make up your mind, are they hypergamous or do they settle? Settling is the opposite of hypergamy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 12:06 AM
-1

Just because you don't understand the relevance, doesn't mean there is no relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 12:04 AM
-2

Nope, water sets its own level. Average women desire average men, and the inverse applies as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 08:36 PM
0

Binary polemics don't exist in real life, you don't have to be red or blue. Most of us live in that area that is neither of the camps, but a milieux of both. The thing about patterns, is that sometimes we train our brain on a curated algorithm that confirms our own biases. My favorite color is red, so my brain draws my attention to things that are shades of red, moreso than things are shades of green. You might be misinterpreting the science,evolution,and logic you seek because of this. I have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 07:52 PM
3

I have more experience with women than the average 10 men combined have. It hasn't led me to Red pill philosophy, in fact I have more success with women than red pill guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/24 12:06 PM
3

Good thing I'm not blue pill. I don't base my opinion on poorly conceived stats, that are used to shape an agenda. I actually read the studies, and check the obvious flaws. I also pay attention to the world around me. As in that I actually go out, and have a social life. Out in the real world, most of the average guys have a a significant other.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 06:00 PM
2

I just watched two women haul asphalt pavers, unload them and got to work on 92° day. It's almost as if when the market pays a premium. People shift to meet that demand. I live in a small rust belt town, we have 5 female officers, so maybe you should question your assumptions, because the rest of us know that female cops are fairly common.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:40 PM
4

Your hypothetical will never happen, the guys checking out of dating, will forever be an extreme minority.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:28 PM
4

There's a lot of women that are becoming heavy equipment operators, and working sweaty,dirty construction jobs. My own daughter is going to start an electrician apprenticeship soon. So yeah, there's women that are willing to take those jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/24 03:27 PM

Again, if you can do it easily, you don't need to pay for it. The A-list celebrities that pay for sex, are usually not great people.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 12:28 AM

Not really, either you can or you can't. If you don't feel like putting forth the effort, then your still not worthy of being someone that teaches others how to. If you can't get reproduce your own results, there's a flaw in your theorem.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/24 12:25 AM

Absolutely, if you have to pay for something that most people can get for free. That means you're not good at what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/24 10:02 PM
1

Those numbers apply to recently graduates, except they make less money than a man 30+. Most short guys are married as well, what I'm saying to you is that you're competing with mostly average men. Those guys are having success in dating, even though tall handsome guys exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 01:52 PM
2

The problem is that the average guy is married. The average guy is around 5'8-5'9, overweight, making less than 55k/ year, and will probably never make more than 60k, and has very middling looks. This is your competition. Do you believe that the man described above has a significant advantage over you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 11:02 AM
4

Getting divorced after 15 yrs is rare, which invalidates your premise. Thus ending the debate you're having with yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/24 10:53 AM
1

It was one year, just look up 50% divorce rate study.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/24 10:50 PM

I met a woman last night, she was smart, tall, in great shape, gorgeous woman. We were vibing, then a subject came up in which we disagreed. I will never lower myself for the affections of a woman no matter how attractive she is. I knew disagreeing with her would end my chances, and I could've salvaged it. Vagina is not worth my values, and personal integrity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 10:22 PM

Yeah, most guys are already sexually successful. The thing is, they just don't want to fuck a lot of the women that desire them. Men are picky more than people think they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 07:00 PM
5

That's been proven wrong repeatedly, the dads are normally involved. We need to clarify the terminology. Being a single mom is rare,being a mom that is single is not. That's a fine distinction between the two.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 06:42 PM
4

There's a recent cdc study that proves you wrong. Most dads actively participate in childcare, and daily household chores. Outside of the data which shows this, in my personal life it's rare that I've come across a dad that doesn't enjoy being with their kids, and are willing to do what's necessary for them to thrive. Happily putting their children before themselves. I take daily walks with my son, on those walks I see dads at the park playing with their children, men doing lawn/housework after …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 01:27 PM
2

The most successful guys in dating are hobosexuals, and broke fuckboys. They invalidate your premise because they aren't embracing patriarchy, and are losing in our capitalist market.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 12:58 PM

When you were born, marital rape was legal. Sexual Harassment wasn't taken very seriously. Bill Cosby just got away with drugging women, and Harvey Weinstein's NY case got overturned. The stated goal of Heritage foundation, which drafts the GOP. Is to take away bodily autonomy, and force women to be SAHM's. A presidential nominee just lost a sexual assault case, and could still win the presidency. These things aren't from the 1800s, they're not even from the 1960s. They have all occurred in your…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:58 AM

The right to not be pregnant if you want to terminate it, even for healthcare concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/24 07:45 AM
1

I have dated gen Z women, and my kids are gen Z. So I get to interact with gen Z frequently. They aren't glued to their phones significantly more than millenials, or gen X.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 11:25 PM
2

Again, another example how you've been influenced. Most women aren't glued to their phones.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 09:12 PM
2

They're still apart of the dating landscape, and their toxic ideas will sour a segment of your preferred dating gender, against you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 09:08 PM
1

It's not that simplistic, I understand that even though I know respect bias exists. My social media that is mostly balanced ideas,and nuanced opinions. Is still not immune to response bias. I had to purposefully curate my algorithm, but in doing so I got sent rage bait pushed to me. You have to go into a discussion with the willingness to accept that you might be wrong, and open to receiving new information.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 07:18 PM
1

I chose those 2 videos because they illustrated the SM bias, I could've chosen 1000 more about the gender wars if I wanted. It's a curated SM, do you not understand how response bias works?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 06:19 PM
1

Yes, actually interacting with people shows that most people are reasonable, and don't hold extreme opinions, and they have nuanced ideas.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 06:14 PM
1

Response bias works heaviest on those that agree the most, and disagree the most. The middle usually doesn't respond.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 06:09 PM
3

You're illustrating my point. r/teachers is a shit show, and the comments on that sub illustrate how many people shouldn't be teachers, and they're really bad at their jobs. That's just the first side of the issue, the other is that home rule creates wildly different standards. I went to a public school that was national merit awarded. My senior year of high school, I had 3 teachers with Dr. In front of their name. The town 15 minutes away were using 20 year old text books. The people on teacher…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 06:06 PM
1

It is taught in school, but response bias, and lived experience resonates more. Feelings matter just as much as facts. We need to address the feelings that shape the narrative.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/24 05:34 PM
1

Too many guys on here interpret game as: slick pickup lines, and obfuscation of truth. Real game is active listening, and empathy. Real game is being able state your clear intentions, and her buying in with a full understanding. That's why a guy like Future, can fuck the wife of someone with more fame and money than him.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/24 01:28 AM
13

You buffed Zoe's traits, and nerfed everyone elses.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/24 09:06 AM
3

Livestock is the way to go, people will pay 3-4k for beef that has a ribbon, or a trophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 02:23 AM
3

Yeah, do you raise large livestock? Maybe it's a regional thing because 4H, and FFA are big deals around here
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 01:00 AM
5

I'm a true purple pill man that isn't an outright misogynist like so many guys here, the hivemind " woman bad" on here is gross. However that does not preclude women from having equally problematic issues, and gendered blindspots. The covert homophobia is one of those items. Anytime I make a comment about it, the responses I get either demonstrate their homophobia, or they twist a convoluted kind of logic that upholds the patriarchal standard of performative masculinity being defined as penetrat…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/24 12:22 AM
2

Disguising homophobia as allyship, and purposefully using benevolent sexism to disguise DV as " reactive abuse". Gathering gays and theys like 4H trophies to show off in your social media menagerie isn't allyship. It's the equivalent of starting a sentence with " I'm not racist but" Slapping, punching,or hitting your bf because he's a ( insert whatever misinterpreted psych 101 level definition that's trending in pop culture) isn't reactive abuse, it's domestic violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 08:55 PM

The problem is that both sides exaggerate the effect. I'm a 40+ guy that still gets attention from women that are in their early, and mid 20's. I understand that most men my age can't do that ( they can definitely get early 30s women). I also understand that that I'm not a unicorn, and in every metro area there are 1000s of guys like me out there. We aren't the majority, we are representative of the average 40 yr old men, but there's more of us, than the otherside thinks. Like most posts on this…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:00 PM
2

Many to women that worship their existence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 02:23 PM
3

Those subs you listed are not representative of the average male experience. Social media, especially reddit isn't indicative of real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:29 PM
1

You're right, that's why I didn't include prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:25 PM
1

Most guys are able to get casual sex
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 01:13 PM
6

68% of men are married
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 12:50 PM
1

Nope, I'm not focused on the outliers, because outliers will always exist. The isolation bubble was created by the pandemic, like all bubbles that have existed. There will be a regression toward the mean. Social isolation will become less prevalent, not more prevalent. Homo sapiens have been social creatures for a few hundred thousand years. A 2 year blip isn't going to change that trend. You're also assuming that the 10% of those that are less active, represents the sum total of incels. The inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:48 AM
6

Not really, because functioning is still too nebulous. If you're 18, and hold a job, and don't deviate from social norms because you blindly follow the codex of your parental figures. Is that really functional, considering that you don't have your own fully formed moral compass. In oppose to someone that had maybe made a few mistakes along the way, and questioned their instilled belief structure, and formatted something that is new, and unique to their own personhood, and autonomous belief struc…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 07:17 AM
5

The legal definition of adulthood, is age of majority. Because people that reach that age, are entitled to all the rights, and freedoms afforded under the constitution. That's what the government considers an adult, and I will not take that away from them. That being said, maturity of thought and action, is independent of legal adulthood. Some have it at 18, some don't get it until 50.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:51 AM
8

Being an adult only requires surviving until you're 18. The other requires taking responsibility, and ownership of your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:36 AM
1

It's the highest it has ever been, it's not even close. The Greeks launched a dynastic war over Helen of Troy. If the Russian kidnapped Charli d'melio( or however you spell her name) all we'd do is send an envoy, and an free an old Russian mafia oligarch. We wouldn't launch an invasion of the Crimean Peninsula. Amanda Knox is being tried for the same crime a 4th time in Italy, we aren't threatening to bomb Salerno. Y'all have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/07/24 06:32 AM
1

18-21 isn't the entire zoomer demographic, but if you want to parse that down to just that narrow subset, that's not representative of the entire generation, we can do that . https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.statista.com/chart/amp/7031/americans-are-tying-the-knot-older-than-ever/ In 1970 when the bulk of boomers were just entering adulthood. The age of first marriage for a male was 23. So by those standards, most men would've still been unmarried at 21.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:35 PM
1

1 in 10 is an outlier, if you can't attain the same level as almost everyone else can, that make you and outlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:25 PM
2

I'm not the one having trouble with nuance here
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:22 PM
2

I addressed every question you asked
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:21 PM
1

No it didn't, 5'10 wasn't tall, 6 ft has been the tall cutoff since the 40s
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:16 PM
1

Yeah I know, it was harder
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:14 PM
1

Zoomers aren't the only demographic that are in this market. The youngest millenials were born in 96, the oldest Zoomers were born in 97. That makes them 28, and 27 respectively. With age of first marriage for women being 28, and men at 30. Both of these generations are just now entering the statistical norms of previous generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:14 PM
1

68 % of all adult men are married, 50 % of all men are married by 30. What's your excuse for not being able to achieve a D+ in basic life success? If you can't replicate the work of 68 % of the male populace, you're be low average. It your job to figure out why you can't achieve the same status as a 5'8, average looking overweight dude that's making 54k/year, how is that guy beating you out on the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:36 PM
2

Your existence isn't proof that dating was easier back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:30 PM
1

Yeah, of course it didn't, I guess tall ,dark, and handsome wasn't a saying in the 60's.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:27 PM
2

https://10best.usatoday.com/awards/travel/best-music-festival-2024/ Don't take my word for it
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:24 PM
1

95% of men aren't incels, most men aren't virgins, or celibate.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:03 PM
1

Art Prize isn't well known, Electric forest isn't one of the main stops on the music festival circuit? Someone should tell that to all the Europeans catching international flights to attend that Electric forest isn't a big deal. There's no money in Grand Rapids at all. For the record I don't even think Grand Rapids is all that great. I can also recognize that it has more to offer than most metropolitan areas in the country.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:01 PM
2

There were lots of bad marriages under the Patriarchy, look what happened in the early 80's divorce rate was nearly 23 in 1000 compared to our current 6.9 in 1000. Which one of those Stat lines would you rather live under?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:49 PM
2

That's countered with men having more options just like women do. Most guys that are statistically similar to you are married, or will be married. What are they doing to get success that you aren't? What makes these very average guys stand out more than you?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:31 PM
2

The thing is, most guys are successful in this current market. Which kinda points out that maybe the market isn't the problem, but rather the product that you're introducing to the market is sub standard, and no one wants to buy a low quality good.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:28 PM
1

The marriage vs divorce rates, the societal norms, and expectations of gender roles. It is less rigid with a wider bandwidth of participants.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:24 PM
0

Follow the thread, there's plenty of links, prove me wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:21 PM
1

That's right, social influence wasn't a thing before smart phones. It wasn't like people subscribed to weekly magazine that were about cultural trends. It wasn't like women fainted when Michael Jackson walked on stage. Drake was the first male entertainer that had women throwing their bras on stage, it wasn't guys like kiss, and Jodeci that had a rabid fan base that more depraved than now. Their were no lifestyle shows like MTV, or lifestyles of the rich and famous. Paparazzi never followed Mado…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 04:18 PM
2

I smoke grass, as in go touch grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 03:57 PM
1

Why are these men genetic dead ends? What makes less likely to mate than average guy in the U.S. that's overweight, unremarkable in looks, and is making 54k/year. What's the great advantage that those guys have over those that can't get a date?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 03:56 PM
1

Each generation was harder to date in as you go backwards into time. As far as my experience being anecdotal, it dovetails with the empirical data.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 03:25 PM
4

She's all that, and can't hardly wait were dramatic retelling of the typical American high-school experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 02:11 PM
5

I know, how could it have been more difficult. As black guy born in the 80's, went to an overwhelmingly white high-school in the 90's, then to rural land grant college that was even whiter in the 2000s, before interracial dating was socially acceptable, and people still used the word "colored". What could I possibly know of dating market struggles in comparison. I had life on easy street.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 02:05 PM
0

I was talking about all previous generations, not just the 90's. Also, the rules was a very popular dating book. I'm not a young man, I've have experience from the 90's to current.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 01:58 PM
5

Nope, didn't call you an incel, but your entitled attitude wouldn't have worked with women of previous generations.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:47 PM
2

Good thing we're talking about data that's been updated since 2021 https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2023/07/marriage-divorce-rates.html
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:46 PM
3

Except no virgin is going to marry you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:34 PM
5

Lol, there expectations were higher, and were more openly encouraged to marry moreso for money, and security than they are now. Everyone thinks that would've slayed during the good old days. Chances are, that if you can't women in this market, you would've failed in previous ones.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:22 PM
3

While the odds of finding a virgin are higher, the odds of finding one of those that wanted to have sex with you are significantly lower.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:19 PM
3

That awkward moment when you find out free love gained momentum under the beatniks, which was a 1950s movement, and the precursor to the hippies. All those men that had fought in ww2, most of them in their 20's, having spent the war years fucking their way through Europe, Africa, and southeast Asia. I'm sure they just returned home and lead good clean Christian lives. Spoiler alert, they did not https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.scroll.in/article/1063230/history-of-sex-how-sexually-liberated-atti…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 12:17 PM
2

Let's talk about our parents, who wouldn't have entered the dating/marriage market until the late 60's, or early 70s, oh wait that's what I've been doing this whole time.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:42 AM
3

I was just trying to get them to say the quiet part out loud. The reason to marry is having a wife for breeding stock, they've already dog whistled "declining birth rate" at every turn. I'm willing to bet that if I dug through their comment history, there's some pro eugenics comments floating around.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:39 AM
4

What's your point with this graph? You're showing marriage rates with divorce rates. From 1980 to now, the marriage rate has only dropped from 10.9 to 6.2. During that same time span. The divorce rate dropped from 22 to 6.9. That's a divorce rate 3x higher, with a marriage rate about 1.3x higher. Which data set indicates greater stability for marriages?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:32 AM
0

What's your point with this graph? You're showing marriage rates with divorce rates. From 1980 to now, the marriage rate has only dropped from 10.9 to 6.2. During that same time span. The divorce rate dropped from 22 to 6.9. That's a divorce rate 3x higher, with a marriage rate about 1.3x higher. Which data set indicates greater stability for marriages?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:31 AM
1

You are blatantly wrong about that, I was a teenager in the mid 90's, hookup culture was alive and well. What is now labeled as a situanship, my older siblings called the talking phase. If you actually listen to the lyrics of popular songs at the time, it was all about hooking up. Even the music we listened to was significantly more vulgar, and in your face than current music https://genius.com/Eazy-e-gimmie-that-nutt-lyrics This was a song from 1993, and every kid my age knew this song verbatim…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:23 AM
1

The data doesn't back up your claim, you're going to just ignore that divorce rates were higher than they are now. More marriages yes, but with a significantly higher divorce rate that outpaces the difference in lower marriage currently. Divorce rate in the early 80's was 22.6, divorce rate for 2023 was 6.9. Marriage rate in 1980 was 10.6, marriage rate for 2023 was 6.2. Which one of those seems like a better market to be married in?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 11:04 AM
3

https://children.worldea.org/percentage-of-children-living-with-2-parents-reaches-highest-level-in-decades-report/#:~:text=While%2087.7%25%20of%20children%20younger,the%20highest%20share%20since%201990. The numbers weren't as dramatically different as you think. The data just gets cloudy because of the way the information is gathered. If you Google " how many children are born to single moms" the result would be 40%, as they count cohabitation without marriage as still being a single mom ( Nixon…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:52 AM
7

Mediocre dudes are still procreating. The next you go out, take note of the men that have a wedding ring, or a gf. You notice how unremarkable these guys are.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:32 AM
1

Hooking up, and getting away with it was easier back then. No social media trail for plausible deniability. Men were more just as desperate for female companionship as they are now.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:30 AM
1

Marriage rates doesn't equate to a better dating market. If your options are limited, or socially constrained. Is that a better market. Divorce rates were higher back then, so maybe that speaks to the quality of the market. Birth rates and dating market are correlates, but correlation doesn't show causation. So they can be independent variables. Interesting that you bring up sexual partners. Gen X, and Millenials have more sex partners than Gen Z at their respective ages. Hate to let facts get i…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:16 AM
2

I'm saying that the percentage of promiscuous women is roughly the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:08 AM
2

Where I currently live, median income is 42k, and median home price is 205k, but there are 88 listings that are 100k or less.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:06 AM
3

So marriage is invalidated if it doesn't produce children?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:01 AM
2

Yup, we agree completely. Leave or date women from a different area. Of course most of them aren't going to date those men. That's because it sets off an alarm for LBH- loser back home. Which is the problem that passport bros face.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 10:00 AM
1

10% is still an outlier
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:56 AM
2

And yet the majority of women marry these unattractive men. I'm willing to bet that the majority of men, do not find the majority of women to be attractive. I personally don't, most women are very average looking, and not attractive. Average women have a hard time dating, and getting commitment.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:50 AM
0

https://theeverygirl.com/i-read-this-90s-dating-bible-so-you-dont-have-to/ The rules were a popular guideline on how to get a husband. Would you marry a woman that followed these rules. I wouldn't, she wouldn't even make it through the whole first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:46 AM
2

Leave, or date women from a different area.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:38 AM
2

I'm from the tramp stamp generation. There's another data point to add to the validity. Those tattoos were called tramp stamps. I'm literally from the generation that made that trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:33 AM
1

It's just as relevant as your point about 80/20. You don't get to have it both ways
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:31 AM
5

So it won't count if the marry at 55, are those people not important?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:29 AM
3

We've known that hymen test could be countered since the 1500s. In the 70s, most cultures didn't enforce the hymen test. You keep insisting that misogyny is clouding my historical view, when it was those misogyny based standards that women had to lie about, which was original statement. On top of that you keep on using benevolent sexism as a way to " expose" my misogyny.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:27 AM
3

Studies show that more people got married younger, that doesn't mean that more got married over a lifetime.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:20 AM
4

I'm 44 right now, and have no problem getting attention from women 22-55. This is the easiest market to date in, if you have anything approaching a reasonable personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:17 AM
5

Again I'll state, just because you weren't aware of the promiscuity of women back then, doesn't mean the rest of us weren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:14 AM
1

Yet the average is married.......but that would mean other factors than just looks are important in mate selection. Thanks for advocating the importance of men working on their personalities, and other intangible qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:12 AM
2

Being more sociable was absolutely a thing back then, but so was having more stringent standards, and dating prejudices that were highly enforced without repercussions.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:09 AM
2

If 2% of men in the past were loners, and now 6% of men are. That's a 300% increase, but would still count as statistically rare,and abnormal.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:07 AM
1

Lol, so if you actually had sex education. You'd know that the hymen test isn't reliable. Also, the hymen standard hasn't been important in most places since the the late 70s. Somehow I'm the misogynist, even though I'm the one advocating female sexual freedom, and you don't realize that hymen standard went out in the 70s, or how easy it was to have a cover story to counter hymen standard( ex: bikes, and horseback riding) go off though.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 09:04 AM
7

Hoeflation was always there, just because you didn't know about, doesn't mean the rest of us weren't taking advantage of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:57 AM
8

Most women aren't stripper now, even women that are on onlyfans are still statistically rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:50 AM
2

I do have sex education, both formally, and informally. Part of that education, is knowing that social stigmas are attached to female sexuality. So women would have to lie in order to placate male fragility, and older social standards. It's interesting that you try to point out that I'm being misogynist, by using benevolent sexism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:48 AM
2

They got those tattoos on their lower back because they wanted guys to enjoy the view while they were giving backshots.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:42 AM
5

Nope, it was just hidden back then. A woman could go work as a stripper in a town 15 miles away, and none would be the wiser. Now, everyone would know about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:41 AM
1

Your reply, actually confirms what I was saying. Of course they'll lie about sexual escapades to avoid cultural ramifications.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:38 AM
3

The singleness/loneliness study isn't reliable because of the methodology flaws. But even within that study they found that the age of marriage for women was 28, and 30 for men. So that isn't a huge difference between the 2. I'll call bs on the idea that most women think most men are below average. The average man is married, so the average woman, is picking the average man to marry. Your points about birth decline have the same root problem. It's not that men are suddenly deficient in the abili…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:34 AM
1

I have dated in both markets, this one is easy than the market of the late 90's.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:24 AM
2

Median income in the area I mentioned is 68k, so it's definitely possible
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:22 AM
4

Look at the source I linked, it's been widening since 1979, this isn't a new trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:18 AM
-4

Anecdotal evidence is only confirmation of your lived experience. That doesn't mean it applies to the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:14 AM
3

Lol, you sweet summer child. Your mom, and aunts lied to you about their chastity, and grandma jerked off enough dudes to start a regional sperm bank. They just didn't broadcast it, but everyone knew what it meant when a couple went to the drive in together.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:12 AM
6

Candace Owen's doesn't believe a single thing she says. She was leftist when she started, then recognized there was a niche she could fill in the right wing. Saw the dollar signs and took them. She says that racism is non existent in America. Even though her family sued her school district and won a large settlement because she was she was racially discriminated. If you pay attention, she's moving more center right, and away from the far right she was entrenched with. This is all to position her…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 08:07 AM
0

Women and men both had stricter standards, and higher expectations. More importantly, they had more anonymity. Everyone moved in silence, a good example of this has rippled through the African American community earlier this year when Hulu aired the Freaknik documentary. It was nationally known music festival that reached its height in the 90's. Documentarians got their hands on archival footage. Parents were calling their adult children and asking them not to watch it until after they viewed it…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:59 AM
4

Historically, women have outpaced men in college since 1979https://www.bestcolleges.com/research/women-in-higher-education-facts-statistics/#:~:text=Back%20then%2C%20roughly%201.7%20million,trend%20has%20never%20reversed%20since. If by local market, you mean 60 mile radius. We've always been in competition with men from other cities. Bruh, women in the past were more shallow than they are now. Political affiliation was gender neutral, because politics was about centrist, not it's about owning th…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:45 AM
4

You disagreed with me on your first comment, then agreed with my submission post in the second comment. I'm saying that now is a better time than the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:35 AM
3

None of that is true, and if you actually celibacy is on the rise. I have some real estate to sale you on the flat earth ice wall. If you can't tell a statistically cooked Stat study when you see one. You'll love the seaside vistas in our planned HOA at Firmament Terrace Gardens. 1/2 plots featuring mid century modern homes, with a modern twist of sustainable building materials. Homes starting at 120k.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:32 AM
-1

How old are you? Where did you get your historical expertise on relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:21 AM
2

The people that are likely to self isolate in today's era, wouldn't have participated in couch co-op back then. Introverts have always existed, we used to call them loners. They have really grown in population percentage, they just have a bigger voice thanks to social media, which creates the irony of them not being loners anymore, because they have an introvert community, and interact with other introverts online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:20 AM
-1

The 80/20 Stat is misleading, but even if we take it as fact. That's limited to online dating, and most people today, are not meeting their partners online.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:13 AM
6

I wasn't specific about men, or women. On social media both complain about "modern dating" in equal number. You don't have to except your lot in life, it's your responsibility to change the self sabotaging things that hold you back.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 07:11 AM
3

Look at the last sentence of my comment, we're saying the same things.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:59 AM
1

Even then, men weren't treated like liege lord of the manor. When they got home from work, they had to participate household affairs. Lawns didn't mow themselves, kids still needed help with homework, diapers didn't change themselves, and like I mentioned previously. Dad's loved their children, and wanted to spend time with them. The idea of the distant father that did nothing in the house,and barely interacted with the children outside of discipline is not a reality for most households at that …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:30 AM
2

You have to be very specific when using averages, including median when you're talking about class, work, or homeownership. Population centers will pull both average, and median up. More than half the U.S. population live in places that have decent homes for 150k or less. Even in desirable population centers there's variance. National median home price is 480k, in Kent County MI, home to the 2 million people in the Grand Rapids metro area. The median home price is 368k, with some suburbs as low …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 06:14 AM
4

He wasn't redpill if you listen to his early content, he was pragmatic. He just saw an angle to grift angry men,and shallow women. While I appreciate a good grift, I don't respect them because they're being honest,and reflecting their real selves. He's the relationship version of Bill Maher,and Candace Owens.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:47 AM
5

I can't wait for the day when we find out all that money Umar got for the school that's unfinished. Was spent on snow bunnies, and femboys. He definitely gives off " Thou doth protest too much" energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:42 AM
1

No he didn't advocate for violence, or physical punishment for women. Kevin Samuels is an excellent case study on grifting, and response bias. Samuels was a wealthy guy that had made some savvy business moves, and helped uplift some others privately. He found out that there was a niche self help market for black men that could be lucrative. His original platform was focusing on young black professional men, and how they can get the women that they wanted. These men would call in, or submit quest…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:38 AM
7

Sounds like you're speaking for yourself. With a misogynist binary worldview. For the rest of us, we operate with a different, simpler philosophy. We date those that interest us, and those that we are compatible with. That's it, that's the whole formula. We aren't running chaos maths to plot out game theory algorithms to attain procreation and increase our familial genetic seed. Y'all overthink this shit too much, before you make a post, or ask some excessively niche guestion that applies to onl…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/24 05:19 AM
1

You're using old out dated stuff that has been debunked.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 11:14 PM
1

The penis scooping out semen was debunked years ago. If you take 1.5 seconds to think about the way a penis is shaped, you'd realize that it would actually push more semen in, than scoop semen out.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:48 PM
1

It would be easier to just say that you don't get any pussy bruh.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:43 PM
2

On top of all that, the life portrayed in 60's 70s, and 80's sitcoms wasn't really indicative of the avg marital relationship. Men weren't lords of the manor in their homes, and wives weren't glorified domestic servants. Latchkey kids were common because both kids worked. Dads were expected to, and happily participated in household chores and child rearing. As someone from the Xennial micro generation. I didn't know a single boomer dad that couldn't cook,clean, or iron clothes. They also seemed …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:38 PM
-1

That's because you're talking about 2 different demographics( caveat for the closeted porn viewers,but they're an extreme minority)for the most part, those that watch porn, adore the actresses. They would date, and marry them if the women would have them. The otherside to that, it's possible to like porn, respect the actress as a person, but still not want to date an actress not because she fucks on cam, but rather the associated lifestyle. I would even extend this to mainstream Hollywood actres…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 10:07 PM
2

Effective communication will get results. It goes beyond communicating that you want sex, you need to communicate to them that it's in their best interests to have sex with you. That's what I mean by effective communication. For your question about women alone, the answer is yes, they are failing to communicate with themselves. Orgasms have a mental component that is often ignored. If the woman is ignoring her mental state, or there is a mental block that is not allowing her to connect. Then it …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 09:42 AM
7

Male sexlessness, and orgasm gap suffer from the same problem. They both are results of a failure to communicate. If you are long term sexless, it's because you don't know how to effectively communicate what you want to the gender of your choice. If everyone you have sex with can't help you achieve an orgasm, it's because you don't know how to effectively communicate what you want to the gender of your choice. Too many men assume that women can discern between good guys, and bad guys. They also …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 09:12 AM
1

That's what I'm saying, voting doesn't always align with morals.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 04:38 AM
0

It's a bad criteria because that's a single snapshot in time at that particular 90 day window, that isn't representative of the entire year, which is the way the resulted are represented. The vast majority of people aren't stressing about not having a committed relationship for a fiscal quarter. I would go so far as to say that it's abnormal, and a red flag to be in a committed relationship within 90 days of breaking up with someone. At the least they could've done a graduated scale of 30,90,180…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/24 02:04 AM
1

Go look up the flaws in that study, and the methodology. That 63% is derived by cooking the numbers. They used a really low bar for single/lonely. It was set at 90 days without a committed relationship. So a person could've been dating the previous 9 months, but because they were single in the 90 day window, they are counted as single, and lonely for that statistical year. Fuck buddies, and situationships do not count as not lonely.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:22 PM
3

The rare acknowledgement that an idea could be wrong. Thanks for having an open mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:13 PM
2

I understand why you hold this view, because of the way media portrays the U.S. as red vs. blue( conservative vs liberal) as living in enclaves with diametrically opposed views. That's not the reality on the ground. As a function of our voting system, it makes it look like we have 2 parties, and officially we do only have 2 major parties, because monetarily the minor parties are locked out. However, in each of the 2 major parties, there are 3-4 factions vying that represent the scope of each par…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 11:11 PM
6

Ethically you're wrong, as Hobbes,Locke et al have previously surmised. All persons are born with natural rights, those natural rights are the bedrock of our moral/ethical understanding. Amongst those natural rights listed is liberty. A key function of liberty is autonomy, or the freedom of choice. Thus we can conclude that a woman's right to deny a physical,and psychological need like sex. Is still very ethical, because it is grounded in the natural rights that we are all born with.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 10:36 PM
1

You're over estimating the shape most young women are in.I live in a college town, most of the young women in college already have a "mom bod", coupled with the surge of mommy makeovers, and 30s ,and 40s women hitting the gym at a higher rate than their younger counterparts. The playing field has become less slanted towards younger women. There's also the fact that older women are much more likely to make the first move than younger women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/24 07:34 AM
1

Like I stated, socioeconomic pressures will cause short term turbulence, but won't radically effect the long term trend. Delay in marriage, doesn't equal abandonment of marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 10:42 PM
1

Yes, they had higher divorce rates, it's public knowledge, you can look it up. As far as why those older generations matter. They are a clue as to what our future will look like. Despite what people think, very little has changed in marriage demographics over the past 100 years. There are a few differences, but it's still very predictable. It's interesting that you highlight the family formation band, while ignoring one of the things that has changed, which would effect, and apply to why the 54+…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 08:13 PM
1

Context applies, in my statement I wasn't referring to a specific individual, but rather a goal of attainment,or concept of attainment. In the abstract, no one ( men or women) knows what they're going to find. They have a nebulous schema of what they want, it's a "target" audience from which they select their person.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 07:56 PM
1

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/thing There are several instances in which "Thing" is the appropriate usage for a human.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 01:49 PM
2

Not the kind of woman that will marry a ppb, the entire thing is a financial transaction. Their "love", and loyalty extends as far as his wallet can afford.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 03:22 AM
1

Keep reading, that is only for people 16 to 54. That excludes the largest part of the population, or are we going to ignore those marriages.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 02:56 AM
-1

Financial stability is the most important trait for a PPB. What they're doing is basically long term prostitution. If they can't hold up that end of it, they have no value.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/24 02:50 AM
2

He has his shit together, I don't agree with pbb, but if you're going to do it. You should at least have something definitive to offer the target.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 09:00 PM
1

You're doing the math wrong, that's not how you calculate divorce percentage. Americans divorce at about 33%.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:22 PM
2

You aren't wrong, they calculated divorce percentage wrong. 6 in 1000 married, divided by 2.5 in 1000 divorced isn't how you calculate divorce percentage. The only way to properly get the number. Is to track all marriages over a lifetime, and find the ones that divorced. By the way, that number is about 33%.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/24 05:18 PM
3

No.....no its not, let me explain the flaw, and how it's different. Let's say that 100 couples get married in 2024. In that same year 50 get divorced. If you just put them together it looks like 50% divorce. The problem is that in 2024, including the 100 newlywed couples, there were a total of 250 married couples. Out of which, 50 got divorced. When you subtract divorces in a year, from marriages in a year. You're ignoring the total number of marriages that did not divorce in that year. The only…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 04:24 PM
2

Lol, are you serious right now? Wow, I thought you were going to at least link something different. You made the same error as 50% divorce study made. Marriages in a year, divided by divorces in a year. Isn't the same as totality of all couples getting a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 04:07 PM
3

It's not relative to marriages, you all just have a pastoral view of yesteryear, and don't know what it was like. By every way that you could tabulate it, divorce rate was higher. You've gone for the double whammy,do you know what retracted means? A retraction occurs when a flaw in a study is pointed out. This is different than debunked,because the author(s) of the research look at the paper again and realize that they made an egregious error. They then release a statement,withdrawing theirs fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/24 02:39 PM
6

The divorce rate isn't high, it's lower now than it was 50 years ago. The 50% divorce Stat was retracted 10 years, because it was shitty math( number of marriages in a year, divided by divorces in a year, doesn't tell you how many marriages end in divorce.) Most couples that are married are happy, despite what pop culture social media state, however it isn't static. Happiness varies through times with ups, and downs. Most people expect, and understand that unpaid labor is part of the package.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 09:03 PM
3

That's why I only do fun dates in the beginning. Coffee shops, or park meet-up.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 02:21 AM
13

If you money to seduce a woman, neither the buyer, nor product are worth having.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/24 01:23 AM
3

Prenuptial are not iron clad, it's just the opening Salvo of the divorce battle.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/24 06:38 PM
1

The only one that's shallow is #9 maybe #11. The rest are all reasonable standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 04:02 PM
1

But are they worse than Ferret people?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 02:35 PM
2

I've never seen a bleached one
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:13 AM
2

I've never seen a bleached one
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:12 AM
1

The ones that say no hookups, fuck on the first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 11:25 PM
0

Or a more reasonable answer is that people have different tastes. Here's an unpopular opinion amongst men on this very board. I think Sidney Sweeney is very average looking( I do like her acting, and she seems to have range, so I look forward to her career) we aren't all going g to agree?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 09:06 PM
2

I bought my ticket when I a girl gave me sloppy top in church, at this point I'm just trying get the high score.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 08:17 PM
3

Grilled with blackening seasoning. Garnished with a Dijon lime compound butter, and granny Smith apple, mango, and blueberry Pico de Gallo. Pair it with a Malbec, a red blend that features a petit syrah.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 08:13 PM
3

Best example so far
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:24 PM
1

I don't even really care about the external validation part, all women need it, that's just a feature written into the code. It just shouldn't be your entire personality. The titties are being highlighted by them, because that's all they have to offer.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:23 PM
3

I get it 🙄💥👍
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:19 PM
2

Yep
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:18 PM
5

I do love fresh fish,and wild game. My former father in law go bush fishing in a remote area in Canada. They get flown in because a seaplane is the easiest way to get there. They get a sat phone and a radio because there are no cell towers. The salmon he brings back is God tier.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:18 PM
1

You're probably more conservative than I am, but I still see the vision. If all or most of her pictures are from the books and up. That's her whole personality, I don't mind being scantily clad, but big titties isn't a trait to base your personality off of.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:14 PM
1

Lol, mouth masher,like when toddlers are first learning how give kisses. They just open their mouths and ram their drooly lips on your cheek.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:10 PM
3

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10355296/ The science suggests it's ambiguous, and no one has a clear answer. One of the things women associated with beards was that it made men seem more stable, and reliable for children, because it reminded women of their dads......Freud has this pesky habit of being right, even though we reject his psychological thoughts.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 07:07 PM
2

Beta fish is a standard aquatic pet I didn't like Titantic, but I love Scarface. My love for scarface is for the complete depiction of the subculture, and the trap that it is. I was born into that kind of subculture so I understand it, a lot of people that like it didn't get the message , or understand the point of the movie. That's why I laugh at Alpha male guys that worship scarface. They clearly don't understand that this is a classic tale of caution, about a guy that didn't listen and flew t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:57 PM
4

Fully on board with immediate swipe left to women demanding performative masculinity traits, and telling me how to be a man through their lens.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:46 PM
3

Neither of those seem superficial, they seem like good vetting .
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:43 PM
1

You will be surprised by how many women are into that. I'm not a hunter, or Angler so it doesn't affect me. But I do know that a lot of women are into that. I think it's because it reminds them of their dad's, and its one of those performative masculinity traits that women look for in men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:40 PM
1

No, don't need to because I know a lot of what we are taught as history is actually ahistorical. So what you're saying isn't a shock to me. Homeboy was definitely super inbred, and had a lisp that's a fact which isn't disputed. Being an origin of the accent is. There's one thing that outrank American Arrogance, and that's European elitism. I was fortunate enough to go to school in a wealthy suburb. In which one of the largest companies in the world had their headquarters, and teachers were well …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:36 PM
6

Allergies isn't a superficial reason, you could never be around them because pet dander is on their clothes. You're just prioritizing your health.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:15 PM
0

Cool, but say Demasiado in castillan, then New world Spanish, and you'll hear the lisp.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:13 PM
1

Rules are rules,stick your standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:10 PM
0

Ok, say this word with a Castillan Accent demasiado, then in a new world Spanish accent.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:09 PM
12

Giving " Try that in a small town" vibes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:07 PM
1

That's the thing, you had an evolutionary response to a smell. The olfactory bulb is the largest part of the brain that exposed to nature, and is right next to the memory cortex. It's the reason that smelling cinnamon reminds of the time that your grandma made snickerdoodles and read to you at sunset. Smell is integral to survival, so being off put by a smell isn't superficial. Was he a fish kisser, those are the worst.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:05 PM
1

Do you know what the crazy part is? Apps do an algorithm assessment that orders your pictures by how much women like them. Which means that women are the ones that are pushing the fish pictures to the front of the line.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 06:00 PM
1

I don't that's superficial, that's an evolutionary response that has been honed from 100k generations of breeding. We have a visceral response to smells because they warn us of danger. Don't let rotten meat put its " meat" inside of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:56 PM
-2

You must really hate our current timeliness right now, because most men have beards.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:52 PM
0

That's the devils work, stay toxic king
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:51 PM
2

A lisp, thath really Thuperfithial of you. On another note, the origin of the Castillan Spanish accent is because the king at that time was so inbred, that he was physically deformed, and his tongue was too big for his mouth, so he had a lisp. However, he was still king of a hegemonic power, so people started talking like him to emulate his nobility.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/24 05:50 PM
2

Grade A example of what I'm talking about , and he also married one of the most beautiful women alive at the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 04:29 AM
2

Is that not still an option? Y'all will contort yourselves into knots to justify a bad opinion. The average woman isn't special, and isn't beautiful. She's overweight, and doesn't spend a lot of time, if any on her looks. Yet she still finds a husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:36 AM
1

30 and unmarried doesn't mean loser. She still has options, she just doesn't explore them.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:15 AM
2

All that disappears when she finds someone with a better deal than you. You set that as the limit to the strength of your relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:04 AM
-1

I'm glad you chose Pearl, because she actually disproves your thesis. Pearl isn't virginal loser woman that can't get men. She's had several long term relationships, she just isn't attracting the " provider man" because those men ironically want the liberal leftist woman, despite saying the opposite. The avg man is married to the average woman. The average woman is overweight, middling looks, and very unremarkable. Think, women Walmart shoppers, not whole foods shoppers. That's the average woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 03:01 AM
1

Welcome to the world of being a future cuck. Your reasoning is going to be why you get cheated on. It makes sense, most cucks are red pill types anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:52 AM
1

I respect the people that I see at the grocery store, I'd help them out if there was a mass shooting at the store. I'd run into a burning building to if there was a chance to save someone. I'd use the Geneva Convention as a bingo card for someone I love.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:48 AM
8

The reasoning is more important than the action. Staying with you because it's better than being alone, isn't really better than cheating.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:41 AM
3

And on this day I shook hands with the devil, because we both agree on something.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:38 AM
9

Le sigh......y'all gotta really stop dog whistling your way out of pussy. Back when America had real men, with real values. The 70s, and 80's when androgyny was a popular style for men. Back when men formed metal bands and did concerts, and videos with long hair, and contoured cheek bones, and eye shadow. Wearing leather so tight that you could trace the vein pattern on their dicks. Ahhh, those good Ole days.......that never existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/24 02:23 AM
-1

There's definitely some truth to this, but personality/character can boost your attractiveness. I have experienced this going in both directions. Someone that I originally wasn't sexually attracted to, after viking with them, the appeal went up. I've also had the experience of seeing a woman so sexy, that I would club a baby seal if she asked. Transform into an abomination of nature because her attitude was so stank.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:30 PM
0

The sisterhood is a myth, and being a girl's girl is only applicable to scenarios in without competition. Women's friendships are often toxic, and parasitic.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 06:03 PM
1

Everything, you need to be interesting. The person needs to be attracted to your mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 08:51 PM
1

It has helped to stabilize, and grow the tribes population. Think about it, if one tribal member has the income to buy a house and car, imagine what two tribal members could afford together? It's also common that the children stay in their parents home for a few years after into adulthood. They can save up money, college tuition is covered by the government under treaty rights, and there's a large college in our town. So they can really get a leg up if they want to take advantage of it. Obviousl…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 07:57 PM
1

It's done as a joke
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 04:02 PM
1

Most of my state is flat, except for a section in the north known for its ski resorts, there's nothing there during the rest if the year. During the winter it turns into a tourist trap for the wealthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 03:02 AM
2

There are many countries that have winter highlands, but for my example I'm referring to an area in my state that has several ski resorts, one of which hosts Olympic trials, and is expensive to go to. I made the mistake of forgetting my gloves once. I had to spend $200 just to get some basic winter gloves.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 11:52 PM
5

Personality max, and be careful because you're going to get women that see dollar signs. To them you're a concept, a part of their future aesthetic, and not a real person. Work on the personality, so that you attract the women that are in for more than the lifestyle. When you have a conversation, look for the ones that use active listening, or disagree with you while providing a solid argument. The ones that challenge you the real deal. Go on fun dates, or low key dates before you hit them with …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 08:51 PM
2

That's the thing, the American citizens aren't telling other countries that there food is poisonous, and ours is superior, that's the European arrogance. Yeah, the U.K banned red 40. However they still allow Allura for industrial food ( restaurants, cafeterias) Allura is the trade name for......Red 40. The E.U. has banned 4 food additives that are used in the U.S.we have banned 16 food additives that the E.U. allows. The best part of the whole situation, is that U.S. food companies helped to wri…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:16 PM
0

Well....that's not true at all. This perception that America is behind on education, is similar to the idea that American food is unhealthy compared to European food. Both of those are misconceptions based on not understanding the regulations, and ways that data is kept. We do a more thorough, and complete evaluation than other nations. Our testing data includes all students, even the ones in special needs classes. That isn't how other nations do it, they exclude special needs students from thei…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 01:57 PM

Playing with numbers to try to make a point, and failing. 18% of total population, not percent of adults that are married.https://www.statista.com/statistics/242030/marital-status-of-the-us-population-by-sex/ As of 2022 175 million adults are, or were married, out 268 a possible 268 million adults. Your data is still bad, and your data manipulation got worse https://psychcentral.com/health/the-myth-of-the-high-rate-of-divorce#divorce-statistics Divorce is really 100 out of every 300. See how I u…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 04:31 AM
1

So you also don't know how active listening, and empathy could improve your chances.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:28 AM

68% of men are married by age 35. Only 1/3 marriages end in divorce. Nice try though
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 03:19 AM
3

None of those things you wrote are true, If you thought only weirdo men watched porn in the 1980s, you are wildly misinformed.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:50 AM
33

The problem is that some guy lacking the skills to attract a woman. Has a bad take opinion, with access to the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:47 AM

Most men get married, most men reproduce. The blackpill is as irrelevant as MGOTW
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:43 AM
1

Yeah, it's the pet theory NATO
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 11:10 PM
1

You're thinking in terms of present tense, Governments think in terms of future tense. If you want until your economy is in crisis from population decline, you've already lost the country. The U.S. is producing more oil right now than any other country, yet we still care about keeping the suez open. It's not just about how much oil you produce, it's also about how much oil you control. Another non Russian oil source in the region can decrease demand, which lowers oil price, and causes Russia to …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:57 PM
2

Wait, you're telling me that a 6 could pull a 7. Next thing you'll tell me is that a 10 would date a 9. So she found a looks matched group, which is not what OP was saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:31 PM
3

Counterpoint: If men understood that operating from a stance of abundance will eliminate the same amount of grievances. There are more women than there are men, remember that. Don't lower yourself just to get some lackluster head, and 20 minutes of starfish sex. Demand your worth, and don't settle. The tricky part is actually being what you think you're worth. Some of you want queens, but you have no crown to offer.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:22 PM
1

6 out of 10 is still above average, and I doubt your 5 buddies were Olympic athletes, or celebrities like the OP stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:09 PM
0

Population decline in Russia isn't because of inherent violence,or political instability. The current Population decline is the political reason. They have 1.7 deaths per birth, that is not a sustainable population number. With such a huge landmass that requires the infrastructure costs of 180 million people, on the budget of 130 million people. They can't afford to keep the lights on essentially. The solution: get Europe to pay for it while they figure out how to stabilize the population number…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:00 PM
2

Empathy isn't manipulation, and neither is active listening.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:36 PM
3

In the U.S, no we are not. We are actually having a population increase due to immigration. It's a problem in Europe, and certain parts of Asia. There's also a bit of a sticky spot to this discussion. The quiet part people don't say. Is that the population decline is occurring amongst their preferred race, and the races that they don't prefer are growing in number, or immigrating to their country.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:35 PM
3

You just don't understand how to apply those skills in a social setting. An important part of retention is understanding the "pain " point, then addressing it directly with empathy, and steer the conversation in the direction that you want. In a social setting that would translate to active listening, and connecting with the person you're trying to attract.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:28 PM
-1

Ok, so why did Russia invade?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:23 PM
-3

Population decline always leads to widespread warfare. It's the underlying reason why Russia invaded Ukraine,and it's going to cause more wars across the globe as Population loss will destabilize regions.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:18 PM
4

And you think those skills can't help you in social settings?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:14 PM
6

What kind of sales were you in, that didn't require good social skills? Even when I did telecom sales, talking to autist IT staff required social skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 07:04 PM
9

You're grossly overestimating the sexual power of the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:26 PM

I know, someone replied " What does riot police have to do with a good party scene" .......that let me know everything I needed to know .
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 05:13 PM

Except.....comediennes make fun of others in their routines. Also, in real life women make fun of other women. The sisterhood is a lie, and very few women are actually " A Girls girl"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:23 PM

Love languages was popularized before wokeness was a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:18 PM

Most of them came from lecherous men that were knee deep in pussy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:17 PM
9

You shouldn't have given him the Game of Thrones treatment. Followed him around the gym ringing a bell, and rhythmically shouting "SHAME". He was a brazen hussy that was trying to corrupt the youth with his lascivious behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 03:04 PM
1

The same thing applies to casual sex, they do it with average guys also. Y'all really are clueless to what female sexuality is really like. Avg guys get casual hooks up.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 07:20 PM
2

I saw a tiktok the other day from a "Girls Girl". She chose public social media to reach out to a woman that now former bff was sleeping with her husband, and talking about leaving his family. That sounds noble on the surface, until you think about critically for a few seconds. In her tiktok she mentioned that her friend had been sleeping with this guy for over a year. So why wait that long to end the friendship, and reach out to the wife? If you're morally opposed that much, you should've done …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 07:18 PM
1

The avg woman dates and marries the avg man. When you go outside and interact with people. You'll see that most couples and looks matched. The plain Jane dates a John Doe. Average women are attracted to average men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 06:52 PM

It's not really contradictory, love doesn't mean forever. Sometimes you fall out of love, or love isn't always enough. That's why no fault divorce is a good thing, being trapped in a loveless marriage does more harm than good.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:27 PM

It's more than that, it gives legal protections beyond that of next of kin. It also offers financial protections. Family law is basically just a codex to insure that the government doesn't have to provide welfare for individuals. Once you understand that, then you understand why welfare regulations are so messed up, and often regressive to the people that need it, and why child support is structured the way it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:19 PM
4

No, open any poli sci textbook and it's defined as the allocation of resources. The study of the allocation of resources within society being a definition of economics. Does not exclude the allocation of resources defining politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 01:33 PM
7

How do I explain those women, simple. They upheld the rules of patriarchy for the ruling class to gain perceived benefit. Money,power, revenge, or all 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:07 AM

You're doing the thing that men on this board get chastised for, if it don't apply let it fly. Then you did the thing, that's weak sauce. If someone in a very public place confronted you and called you home wrecker for sleeping with their husband. I bet you'd just smile and accept it because you're not a homewrecker. I don't care that some random woman tried to insult me by labeling me with a slur. I'll never see her again, it's disheartening that women feel it's okay to use a homophobic slur in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 05:03 AM
10

The same cabal of male dominance that penned things like the magna Carta, or the constitution. Which only gave rights to certain classes of men. We don't call it a conspiracy theory, we call it Politics. What is the definition of Politics: The allocation of resources. Let's follow the money now, who controls the resources? Is it overwhelmingly men, or women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:49 AM
2

Nope, they struggle from choice heuristics because of abundance. People are attractive to their same age cohorts, and most people, including men . Date and marry within a 5 year range. So a 40 yr old woman will still be attractive to men 35+ and she'll be attracted mostly to men 35-45. There will also be a sizeable portion of men that in their 20's that will pursue a 40 yr old woman for a committed relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:44 AM
6

That's so meaningless it's nebulous Does the average woman make less than the average man still? Is there currently an attempt to takeaway bodily autonomy for women? I'm going to head you off at the pass, yes women don't go after the same jobs as men, and yes women don't take the high paying physical labor, or dangerous jobs And yes, men don't have bodily autonomy. We can get drafted, and need to have a signed and notarized paper of our wives signing off on vasectomy. But what if I told you that…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:38 AM
3

Pick better milf's, recently divorced ones, or ones that have just sent their children off to college.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:30 AM
2

Patriarchal structure that we all have to live by. Patriarchy dictates the rules of the game. We have to figure out the best way to play it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:27 AM

Congratulations, you won the award for virtue signaling unicorn. When people use terms like Men, or women in discourse. They aren't referring to every person in that group. It's a reference to how the average person in that group believes. If it don't apply, let it fly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 04:26 AM

Or.....if you needle down the reasoning, and get past the curated PC answers that people give. At the base its because they view men that sleep with men as less than. The thing about covert phobia/ism is that person doing it, doesn't always recognize that they are. As for lesbians, they don't view bi women as less than. They still interact with, and treat them like women, are still have an attraction to them even though they reject them,nice try though.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:55 AM
-1

Excellent breakdown of the " Talking Points" that are used to bash women, instead of having an honest critique of social dynamics and their root cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:44 AM

Cool write up, but 63% of women 18-44 won't date a man that has ever had sex with another man. They dress it up with lame excuses, but what it boils down to, is that they don't view them as real men. As men, we have to come to terms with our collective shortfalls. Do some time navel gazing, and do better. This is one of those times when you should do less talking, and more introspection, because women are rightfully being called to the carpet because of your emotional blindness that won't let yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:37 AM

2 things, the actual survey was done by Cornell University. The other is that a generational magazine geared toward women, would be an ideal source to pull that data. Playboy magazine used to publish groundbreaking groundbreaking articles about politics, and culture. I even used their article that they published about the Mafia as the centerpiece of a research paper on organized crime in a high level sociology class. They had they had the most extensive research, and best layout of how LA Cosa N…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:31 AM

Yeah, most women are homophobic 63% of women to be exact. https://www.yahoo.com/news/why-many-women-unwilling-date-172100681.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAC3201NCO9yJnB2z-T2sn_mRcoj-8hdNmGPsGmvejrGzzU-i1PFtb1L4VuLSDRd8KX_flaFxVBGTCHwVCL3XYsk_luVQ-9jMj_9dJXrOowkJZtagLTMTgXZze9Zd_VOq60Pt89-SBtN4svonJ0zncli8dqf6kR90pWB0sH5dbj5D
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:17 AM

It's the cognition that every heteronormative man has sexual interest. A gay man is not heteronormative, therefore not a "real" man. It's a concept called " othering" that's the academic level of describing it. The colloquial way to describe it. Is how common it is for women to refer to their gay male friends as "sis" or treat them as feminine when they are male presenting and not Trans, or non-binary.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:13 AM

If it don't apply let it fly. Real allies to any cause is better than ally with an asterisk.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 03:07 AM

Well, the average woman wouldn't date a bi man, so I associate with the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:49 AM

That theory actually proves my point when you look at the reasoning. Covert homophobia is still homophobia.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:48 AM

Yeah, and women have helped to uphold that part of patriarchy the entire time. This isn't anti feminist, because women are clearly the greatest victims of patriarchy system, however there are some features of it that they uphold because of perceived benefit. Even though in the end its not really a benefit. It's evident in the way that the average woman doesn't understand that benevolent sexism is detrimental, instead they seek out those traits. You want a man to make you his passenger Princess, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:21 AM

I'm going to spill some real tea right now. Ladies, I'm going to hold your hand while I say this. The parasitic relationship you have with gay men, is because you're homophobic. You don't view gay/bi men as real men, you view them as "less than" . You fawn over effeminate gay men that use black female affectation like a 21st century minstrel show. As entertainment, you love the caricatures that they do, while not considering them the same as heteronormative men. You love them in the same way tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/24 02:05 AM
0

Lol, one of our schools was a noted party school by places like Playboy, and U.S. news, the other went to a commuter school. Also, I wasn't in a frat, frat parties were open to everyone on campus, I'll up your mile of crowd with 4 square blocks of parties, and open container drinking being allowed on city sidewalks.Until 2 am when the riot squad came in.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 11:00 PM

Both of those things are very indicative of Prison. The south still has prison farms, and road crews. Prison labor is the new slavery, as many industries depend on prison as part of their manufacturing https://www.aclu.org/news/human-rights/captive-labor-exploitation-of-incarcerated-workers#:~:text=Our%20nation%20incarcerates%20more%20than,people%20working%20on%20the%20outside. Also, have you ever seen a person detox, or go through withdrawals. They puke,shit,and pass on themselves, especially h…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:57 PM
1

https://www.ladbible.com/news/pornhub-year-in-review-2023-106791-20231218 I'll just leave this here, draw your own conclusions
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:47 PM
4

Confirmed, you went to school that had an average college party scene, which is lame. Our party scene involved riot squads, police on horseback, lighting police cars on fire. Frat parties that hosted 400 people, at each house on Greek row, with a $5 all you can drink admission charge. Our local meat market bar had Deadmaus as the house DJ. The infamous porn studio Girl gone wild would come to our campus several times a year to film at bars,and frat parties. Schools in the Midwest go harder than …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:19 PM

Requiem for a dream does a great job depicting addiction, and the ways in which it can manifest, and how all the players involved interact with each other. On a personal level,one of the things that I took from my wild days of seeing the dope game from the inside. It has created a hard rule for me: Women that use coke, even casually a few times a year, are not to be dated. They cannot be trusted under any circumstances. Cocaine does something different to women than it does men. It flips a switc…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 07:43 PM
5

You went to a boring college, I went to a noted party school that was ranked in the top ten Playboy party school for over 20 years. In most places around the country, women in their 20's 30s go to the same bars. So they were available to flirt with college aged men, and we definitely picked the fruit off that tree.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 07:29 PM
11

Nah, I'm the Stacy's Mom https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dZLfasMPOU4&pp=ygULc3RhY3kncyBtb20%3D And the American Pie generation. It was such a cultural moment that college aged women glammed up by dressing business casual to go clubbing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 07:20 PM
42

I have a near 30 year dating history, so that gives me a longer view of dating than most people on this board, because of that I can offer the following: not much has changed,contrary to popular belief women and men today aren't vastly different, than they used to be. When I was 19, everybody wanted a MILF. This hasn't changed at all. I have a friend that just celebrated her 50th birthday. There are men in their 30s trying to go on dates with her, and she's shooting them down. My 42 yr old ex wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 02:13 PM

Cool, but all the traits that were listed about what black women in Europe like, are the exact same traits that black women in America like.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 09:15 AM

I look at the thread above this one. There's a comment about black women, in which one is listed as an ideal beauty. He commented specifically that she wasn't. Sometimes they just can't help but expose themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 09:12 AM

It might be the racial equivalent to gay panic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 09:05 AM

Everything he mentioned about the black women in Europe, can be copy pasted unto the CV of African American Women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/06/24 08:59 AM
1

Next time Just say that you have no game, we'll understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 02:20 PM
0

I'm fortunate enough to have an abundance of women around me, and I know my worth, I'm the end men get to dictate the final circumstances. Just because you don't have the ability to attract jlhigher tier women, doesn't mean the rest of us don't. It isn't even that hard to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/24 07:04 AM
0

Conservative tradwife, and redpill wife aren't necessarily the same thing. She was a conservative trad wife that pipelined through some alt conservative circles.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 08:33 PM
0

You don't understand male sexuality if you believe this board is how men think.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:30 PM
1

Yeah, the sex doesn't make the person boring, their personality is why they get ghosted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:21 PM
1

This subreddit isn't indicative of real life, if that's all it took then women wouldn't have a problem finding men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:17 PM
0

No it won't
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:15 PM
1

I reject the idea of women being less horny than men. Y'all just express it differently than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:11 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:55 AM
2

Porn is also abstract
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:55 AM
5

Female on male sexual assault is swept under the rug on the basis of " men would sleep with anything "
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:43 AM
8

Thanks for the clarification
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:41 AM
1

I get the nuance of primary attraction v emotional connection, I would counter that for most people visual attraction is like an abstract sexual attraction. It's more of a concept than a real actionable mental cognitive state. It only becomes real after a mental connection is made.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:40 AM
0

Clearly from my example I haven't turned down a woman that had a 10 personality. This is centered on the idea that men will fuck anything. Yes, I have turned down a woman that was physically a 10, but her personality was sub standard. Also, unicorns aren't rare mythological beasts. People just didn't know what they were looking at. Which is a good analogy to illustrate your misunderstanding of this debate, and what constitutes a 10.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:33 AM
-1

Porn and strippers aren't seen as "real" in the same sense as one sees a relationship partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:27 AM
2

Women want the opportunity to reject your sexual advances, without that they assume you're not really into them. I learned this when I switched my dating styles because I wasn't having long term success. I got less 2nd dates when I stopped trying to advance on the first date. I will add this caveat, I would normally talk to women for 4-6 weeks prior to having a 1st date, so that could've played into it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:11 AM
1

Women that are demisexual watch porn also. Demisexual doesn't mean that they lack sexual desire. They just need a mental connection to have sexual desire for a real person.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 04:04 AM
2

Yes, I have actually turned down a woman that did model internationally. She wasn't on a Giselle level, but she did have regular steady employment from some of the big fashion houses. I will counter that there are a lot of 10s that are not well known people, they are just regular people born genetically blessed, but have a normal existence. I do live in a college town so maybe the population is skewed toward higher beauty representation.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:51 AM
0

Demisexual doesn't mean that you are devoid of basic sexual urges. Demisexuals watch porn, even go to strip clubs. Wait until you find out how many strippers, and escorts are demisexual. Also in the U.S, only about 2 million men per year pay for sex, that's just Slightly over 1% of men per year.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:46 AM
-1

I have all the normal social media people in the U.S. have. I just understand that it's not real. The median income in the U.S. is 68k, the average person is slightly overweight, and has no savings, and is also in debt at some level. So the jetsetting young people that are taking trips to Tulum, and burning man. While living in spacious homes on the coast doing yoga, and pilates in the morning after eating a breakfast of chicory , and foraged wild berries is not a normal existence. I will admit …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:42 AM
5

Pump and dump is often a misnomer. It should be titled trial and error. The reason they get dumped, is because often their personality can't hold the attention of the pumper, y'all just don't wanna hear that. You're also wrong about the hoe/housewife. Most "hoes" end up happily married, a lot of times to conservative redpill types. A common theme I notice on this board is that people don't question pop culture/social media. Pop culture is a myth designed to give the masses a superiority complex,…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:27 AM
3

The parking lot of a bar that's just recently closed tells a very different story. Ladybits tingle just like men's do,they look to get the kitty fed. The difference is that women move in silence, whereas men brag about their conquests.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:19 AM
2

They don't want to hear that part, and they usually ignore the part of the redpill that tells them to work on themselves first, so that they can improve their options.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:16 AM
4

Sometimes these guys just out themselves, fully dry snitching on themselves that they have zero game, or human realistic sexual values. Humping a tree, versus having a connection to a woman? That's not a hard choice for the overwhelming bulk of humanity.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:13 AM
0

I would argue that's not really not true as well. If you have women as friends, you'll start to see the reality of how dating works for them. They just have the luxury of being the ones that get pursued moreso than men. So of the melted popsicle looking looking dudes that my very pretty friends have dated proves that the threshold is actually a sub basement. Those guys just had the confidence to approach them, and the game to match.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:09 AM
5

Yup, and law of averages generally plays out. Couples are usually looks matched.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:02 AM
5

Say it louder for the red pill larpers in the back.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 03:00 AM
1

Yeah I have, and I still do. I operate from a stance of abundance, I won't lower myself just because a person was born genetically blessed. Pulling a 10 isn't even that hard if you have any semblance of game.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:59 AM
16

I 100% agree with you, but pop culture has always tried to paint male sexuality as simplistic as possible. We're just beast looking for a hole to fill. Which is not even a correct assertion for wild animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:51 AM
10

Most of us are not down as bad as you are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:46 AM
5

Hobosexuals do have greater visibility in public due to them usually having more sex partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/24 02:44 AM
1

It matters, lower class skips Dental work, which can affect face shape. If you're a sickly child, and your patents can't afford health care costs, that can also affect your physical appearance. That's just the physical looks, the lack of mental health support can ruin a genetically blessed person, rendering them undateable.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/24 02:37 AM
1

It goes deeper than that, the parents of a nation willfully starve if it means their kids will not. If the children of a nation are starving. The parents will do whatever is necessary to feed their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/24 12:30 AM
0

You go to the wrong barbershops. The ones I usually go to are clean, and nicely decorated. The ones that aren't as nice, are usually start ups run as a small business, of course they have to level up to attain the higher standard. I've also seen hair salons that were a pit of squalor before they were able to level up. Be careful, your socioeconomic elitism is starting to show. That's not very intersectional of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 08:52 PM
30

Modern heads of state that have been women, matched their historic counterparts. On a macro level like nation states, the decisions are the same. You have to look out for the best interests of your nation. If your people need a resource, and the other nation has it, but is not willing to share, or will only do so at a cost that will break your country. You're going to take their resources because you want your country to survive, and the other nation is going to demand a high price for those res…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:54 PM

And that's OK, use it as a filter. If they can't empathize with your situation, they aren't for you anyways. There are enough women out there that will. Men need to start dating like women, know your worth and stick to it. If you live in a town that has 1,000 available women, but you're only compatible with 1% because of your dyspraxia. That still leaves you with 10 women that are willing to make you a Passenger Prince, go pick up that crown king!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:40 PM
1

Some matriarchies have been egalitarian. However, that egalitarianism is only shared within their borders. Out side of their borders, matriarchies have fought with one another. You're passing moral judgement on people without considering the socioeconomic context of why they made those choices. If you were in their position because of socioeconomic you might have made the same choice they did, but I digress. Yes men commit more violent crimes, but that's because crime itself is still very much a…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:34 PM
0

No.......none of that is true, and yes I have the data to prove what I'm saying. Single mother is a misnomer that was intentionally done by the Nixon administration to vilify black, and other minority men. The way they tabulate single mother in research is by marital status. So a child born in a home with long term unmarried cohabitation couples is still marked as having a single mom. On top of that here's the breakdowns on demographics. 77% of Children in the U.S. live in 2 parent homes https:/…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 07:17 PM

That won't really make a difference. It's one of those weird vestigial hangovers. Women have their own houses, cars, and freedom to do as they please. They still want the man to drive, and expect him to know how to fix things. I'm not knocking them for their preferences, it is what it is. Feminist movement was about egaul access,opportunity, and autonomy of choice. They choose men that remind them of their fathers, in the same way that men choose women that remind them of their mothers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 06:45 PM
3

Everyone complains about something, because we're human and no one is perfect. Married women complain a lot less than single women. The view is just obscured because happily married women don't brag, and why would they, the same thing applies to married men. If you have a partner that does most, or all of the things that you need to be happy. That stops being exceptional after the first few years, and becomes the standard that you expect. In the U.S. KFC is just another fast food place, in Japan…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 06:36 PM

I think the dyspraxia is going to be a bigger hurdle for him than you think. Passenger Princess is a real thing, it's a holdover of masculine associated roles. Women still expect men to drive all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 06:25 PM
0

5k per year is based on the parenting time, and income of both parents. So that means the split time, and income of each parent is very close. Also as someone that is divorced, with joint custody of children. That 5k number is just the baseline support. That doesn't include the monthly health insurance that we pay, or the complete responsibility for any healthcare expenses incurred. That doesn't include the dental expenses we pay. That doesn't include buying clothes throughout the year. That doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:59 PM
2

Bruh......most women that are single aren't going on multiple dates per week, they aren't talking to a dozen guys at a time. The average woman doesn't a reverse harem of orbiters. The most common way that women meet their partners is real life, not online. They still prefer the time consuming approach of vetting a person face to face.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 02:36 PM
2

It's more competitive than the Rennaissance era, but not more competitive than the telegraph era in any appreciable way. Actually even before then, in the 1600s they advertised for women to get free passage to the colonies. So you could stay in Europe and be a destitute peat bog harvester. Or go to the Americas and live out your romantic fantasy, where land was plentiful and cheap, and fortunes were being made by swashbuckling rugged handsome men. So since the colonization of the Americas, datin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:56 PM
2

So you want the same dating prospects as people that didn't have basic human rights, and you would've had less dating options, and less control over who you were allowed to marry? Good luck with that, there's a reason that we as a society chose something different.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:27 PM
8

I'm a xennial, with Gen X siblings, silent gen/boomer patents, Depression era grand parents. My family was mostly women that were part of the Great migration. They've always been like this. The biggest difference is that the veil has been lifted, and we can see behind the curtain. You just didn't know that you were competing with guys from other cities, because the women you were interacting with didn't tell you about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 05:25 AM
1

https://www.divorcewizards.com/Child-Support-Statistics-2002.html#:~:text=76%25%20of%20Fathers%20with%20at,do%20not%20contribute%20at%20all. My bad, it was 15% not 10%
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 04:08 AM
20

No, women were always like this. Women have never wanted low effort,low aspiration men with no personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:13 AM
0

That's not what I said, and it runs counter to what mainstream feminist thought is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 03:09 AM
3

It was the American version of 4B, which actually tracks if you look at the structures endemic to S.Korea that caused the 4B movement. In the 1970s we had those same issues, and women fought to overcome them. The movement was also about as popular as 4B is now. It didn't have mass appeal amongst women, and it proportionally an outlier. It did work though, and 4B will also work. As much as we internally complain about the state of our socioeconomic structures in the U.S, and rightfully so. We do …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 01:15 AM
1

No, female prison hierarchy is matriarchal. There aren't men making rules on their structure, or how they administer it. Female prisons, and prisons in general show us what it would look like if we only had one sex. People would still gravitate toward power, and use any means to get it. Violence would still occur at a slightly lower rate, but other crime continue, and if the prison rate is indicative, sexual violence actually increases. Human nature doesn't differentiate between sex/gender in th…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:13 AM
1

Dead beat dads represent only 10% of non custodial fathers. Dads love their kids, so they pay child support and love spending time with them. Here's something that goes against the common narrative. 57% of non custodial mothers are dead beats.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 03:14 PM
1

I also think that's going to happen, but on the other end. It will drive up the market for authentic verified leaks. Amateur porn will become even more popular than it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:51 PM
2

Yeah, I did the math on that for you. The 1% is the amount of compatible women out of 1,000. Compatible also means that they are considered attractive to you, and you to them. 1% isn't a hard threshold to achieve, and most places have more than 1,000 available women.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:39 AM
4

30% of women do not identify as childfree, as previously mentioned. Only 18 percent of the population identify as childfree. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/02/15/among-young-adults-without-children-men-are-more-likely-than-women-to-say-they-want-to-be-parents-someday/#:~:text=Three%2Din%2Dten%20say%20they,45%25)%20say%20the%20same.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:35 AM
1

It's not tougher being childfree, it's just another pro/con trait like anything else. Your dating pool is going to be smaller than most men, but it's not the end of the world. If you live in a town with 1000 single women, and you're only compatible with 1% of them. That's still 10 women that you have to choose from.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:26 AM
4

You've got that backwards, the childfree movement is for people that don't ever want to have children. That's different from people that just don't have children. As for the childfree wave, only 18% of people are absolutely certain that they don't want children, while 30% are unsure. Something to note, as women get into their 30s. The biological drive to have children increases exponentially. Most of the undecided are going to have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:23 AM
-1

Depopulation is a very bad thing, it's basically colony collapse, and also having the hive attacked by wasps. Depopulation always leads to widespread resource wars. Case in point: The invasion of Ukraine is because of population decline in Russia. They wanted natural gad, and oil deposits Ukraine had. As a way to fund the future infrastructure costs of a depleted populace. Even though population is less, you still have the same infrastructure costs of the vast territory you occupy, except now wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:16 AM
2

Child free, and not a mother yet are vastly different things. OP never wants to have children, there aren't very many women that are currently childless that share his views. The 30% number you reference is predominantly in the not a mother yet category.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 07:04 AM
2

No
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 02:00 AM
2

The Prisoner dynamics, systems,and structures that are endemic to male prisons. Mirror in female prisons, amongst prisoners. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793850/ Inmate on inmate sexual violence is actually higher in female prisons than male prisons. There's also a weird thing that they do when researching female prisons. I think they do it because if they talk about the inhumane treatment of women, then they'll actually have to take prison reform seriously across the board. Wha…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 12:41 AM
-4

It's a common experience for both men, and women. One of the roots for mother daughter problems is usually resentment over the affection that dads give to their daughters. Coming from the other angle as a dad, many women will not date a man with kids ( especially daughters) because they want to be the center of the man's life, and don't want to share attention with children.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 05:21 PM
1

It's not a few, they all can. Most just don't choose to, in the same way that most men don't choose to be able to bench press 200 lbs. The reason that trades pay well, is because most people don't want to do them, not because they can't. Female slaves did hard field hand work on farms. In emergent countries women do agriculture work with a 25lbs baby strapped to them. During WW2 when the men were off fighting in the war. Women in the 1940s were doing factory work. Miniaturization, and advanced a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 03:06 PM
1

Just because it's rare, doesn't mean that they can't do trades . They don't have to surpass the strength of the strongest male, they just need to attain the strength of the avg male. Which isn't hard, considering that most guys aren't very strong.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 12:56 PM
6

Having female friends, it allowed me to see "How the other half lived" being able to intimately see thru their eyes has shaped my relationship worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 08:08 AM
2

No, none of this is true.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 07:55 AM
2

That was never enough, we need to abandon this retconned history of the past. There was never a time in which men were expected to just be a provider, and the wife was happy. Dad's have always cooked,cleaned, and taken care of children. They did it because they loved their families, and wanted to be involved.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 07:54 AM
8

Yeah....life is semantics, but more importantly. Given the option of a young attractive woman, versus an older attractive woman. The older woman is going to get picked more often.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 01:04 AM
6

Physically attractive, and sexually attractive aren't the same thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 12:42 AM
4

Physically attractive maybe, but that's not all, or even the most important part of attraction
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/24 12:31 AM
7

Most men at 45 already have children, or don't really care if they have them or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 11:26 PM
2

Female prisons disprove your idea. As long as power exists, there will be someone that takes it. Just remember, that klansmen had somebody at home starching their robes. The greatest pirate ever was a Chinese woman that had her own navy that rivaled nation states.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:36 PM
1

Shh, don't hurt his ego like that. He doesn't understand that biologically women can gain muscle mass with exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:33 PM
2

Teans Atlantic Slavery disagrees with you. Women were doing the labor intensive work as well. So does traditional family farms. Y'all have retconned history if you don't think women helped with labor on family farms.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:31 PM
6

I'm going to challenge your supposition that older men Naturally find younger women more sexually attractive. People are generally attracted to others in their same age cohort. You're also relying far to heavy on physical attraction, in oppose to the more important mental attraction. Men, just like women rely far heavier on mental attraction than people want to believe. Everyone woman has a beautiful friend that can't quite seem to keep a partner. That friend is also usually problematic. Beauty …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/24 10:24 PM
2

Be careful, thru my line of work I'm a mandated reporter. It will get you sooner or later, and when it bites it's going to bring it all rushing back at you like a rogue wave.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 04:38 AM
1

Work on your mask, keep things very light, and surface level, focus on fun. You've all heard the advice to play to your strengths. Here's something more important: maximize on your weaknesses. I had a "spicy" childhood that makes me a contender for red flag hall of fame. The physical scars pale in comparison to the mental, which has left me with avoidant attachment, Chronic Post traumatic stress disorder, and Obsessive compulsive disorder. This cocktail makes it so that I don't trust people, so …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 03:57 AM
1

It's also response bias at work, algorithmic engagement sends you content to illicit a response. Rage drives engagement which increases ad revenue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 06:09 PM
3

Red pill doesn't make men angry, it just attracts a lot of very angry men that interpret some of red pills tenets as a way to attack women for their own personal shortcomings. They have an external locus, whereas a man with an internal locus will heavily gravitate toward the part about improving yourself. Upset people complain more than happy people brag. That's why on reddit you'll see most RP content coming from the angry external locus. The other guys are too busy boosting their n count becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 05:10 PM
1

I'm not advocating for leibensraum, but there's a reason countries worry about population decline. Whenever it happens, it always leads to war. The underlying reason that Russia invaded Ukraine is that they are having a similar population decline to Japan, and China. In thr U.S. we are insulated from those problems, there were a few things the early Presidents got right. Having an extremely liberal immigration policy. I know that it seems counter factual, but we have the most open policy of any …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:42 PM
6

No, stop sucking Elon's balls. He's not the first to mass produce electric cars, Ralph Nader has done more than Elon will ever accomplish for the environment. He's not even a good person. He's destabilized regimes, and caused armed conflicts. He's not a hero, he's a bond villain.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:28 PM

When you're a parent, you'll feel differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 04:08 PM

You don't understand how violating your parents rules, and trust is analogous. When you have kids you'll understand the proximity.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:40 PM

This is more like : When your parents say that you can't let your friend borrow your Xbox, but you do it anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 12:39 PM

Even that one is still stretching it, and is dependent on the non relationship partner being manipulative. Which in most cases they are not. The manipulation vector usually travels the other way.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:17 AM

So you're using it as a sociological term, and not a psychological term?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:30 AM

I think you misunderstood, it's not less detrimental.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:28 AM

It is, and we are seeing the signs, we just haven't hit increase in crime level yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:27 AM

I don't think you know what that word means
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:25 AM

My brother in christ I have bad news for you, they're already in your social circle.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:21 AM

You should talk to the children of parents that stayed together when they should've gotten divorced. The outcome was still a broken home, and the children usually know that the parents are unhappy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 01:11 AM

What if they chose to leave, are they wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 10:40 PM

Texas.....one of the most backward states in the union. You do realize that Texas is an outlier, and that standard isn't applied equally. Be black,brown, or poor in Texas and see how that works. https://www.texastribune.org/2023/03/07/texas-execution-gary-green/ Looks like this guy got executed for killing his wife
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:54 PM
2

With the cult like adoration that some men have, or identify with the main character. It's a nice sneak peek into someone's inner machinations.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:45 PM

It's morally correct to stay married in a non abusive situation with children. It's not right to stay married to someone that you don't love anymore. So which choice is correct, stay or leave?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 08:00 PM

The rational actor would've stopped at the process when they got to the "If" the legal ramifications outweigh the potential upside.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:51 PM

They get the same sentencing protocol. If you kill your spouse in a crime of passion. You get the same sentencing as someone that killed a person over a drug beef regarding territorial operations.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:44 PM

It is the morally correct thing, not necessarily the right thing. Morality doesn't always line up with right or wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:38 PM

Crime is lower because of things like: Higher educational attainment, increase in support for the lower economic class, less unwanted children, a broader more diverse economic participation. That last one is the most important. When the economy is better, crime goes down. The state of a national economy dictates everything else, no need to commit crimes if jobs are plentiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:37 PM

Murder is not the act of a rational actor
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:23 PM
1

You can't lure someone away from a relationship. You made a very big jump from someone with autonomy making a choice, and purposefully drugging someone to take away that autonomy. I think it's weird that you think the 2 are equivalents.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:27 PM
1

I think this is one of those times where cultural context is needed to understand an old saying. You're taking the analogy a bit too literal. In the anglosphere, a relationship on the rocks infers that there's a problem with the foundation of the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:22 PM
-1

We're heading in the opposite direction of what you state. Even poly relationships have rules that define what infidelity looks like. Crime is also lower now, than it was in the 90's.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:07 PM
2

Yeah....that's what Crack in the foundation is, a relationship that's in trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:01 PM
4

As a culture we decided to draw an arbitrary line for age of majority because we had to. The anniversary of your mom pushing you out of her vajeen, doesn't always correlate with mental maturation. I have dated women in their 20's that have the maturity we associate with those in their 40s, and I've also dated the inverse. The problem is that some people are dicks, and the arbitrary line provides a buffer zone that the adolescents need.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:58 PM
2

The person wearing the ring is the one that needs to respect it. Divorce rate is lower now than it was in 80's, and it's not because their are less marriages. People are making better choices when it comes to marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:37 PM
1

What you just wrote, is the definition of Crack in the foundation. Allowing someone outside of your relationship to influence your relationship is chasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:32 PM
5

If your partner defers to the influence of their friends over their spouse. There's a much bigger problem at play, that's not a Crack in the foundation. That's a sinkhole that formed a long time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:27 PM
1

In order to come between a couple, there has to be an open space. You all keep missing that part of the equation. Internal problems of the relationship or individual are what allows someone else into the picture. Your job as a partner is to always be the better option. Continually nurture the relationship, don't become complacent.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:22 PM
-2

You can't stab someone in the back if you don't have a pre existing relationship with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:11 PM
1

Absolutely true, if you begin a relationship as an affair. That shows that your partner has an inclination towards that end, so buyer beware.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:05 PM
-2

Weird perspective that you have,manipulation can only occur when there's a void to fill.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:03 PM
3

Someone explained it on SM,basically they are twinks. They aren't in love/competition with each other. She was just the conduit through which it passed.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:57 PM
2

Her character is going to become centerstage in #3
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:53 PM
3

You forgot American Psycho
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:50 PM
1

You didn't like it because you didn't understand it, and now you're experiencing narcissistic injury, and can't handle it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:13 AM
1

So you really didn't like the movie, and you have a fragile ego.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:08 AM
2

Each you reply, you further illustrate that you didn't understand the movie. Take your L, log off on Reddit, and try again in the morning.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 07:03 AM
1

So you don't really understand grooming. Groomers wait until they are adults, and spend the interim planting the seeds for copulation at adulthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:59 AM
1

So....you didn't understand the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:18 AM
2

Yeah, dissecting pop culture narratives on a deeper level is fun. Pop culture shapes narratives, and those narratives are often bad takes. So it's good to take a deeper dive instead of the surface level takes that plague pop culture. Film, and literature can be transformative. One of my Canon events, was the cognitive dissonance created by reading "The Color Purple" it helped me in my early teens understand women in a different way.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:49 AM
1

I didn't think that deep on what was basically a defense department cover letter movie. On thinking about it after you wrote that, it was a good example of show me, instead of tell me, and he rose to the occasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 03:44 AM
3

Just because you don't understand the nuances of grooming, doesn't mean that he didn't do it. I'm probably older than you, I saw the movie the year it came out. Portman, and Reno were amazing. I knew she was going to be a star after watching that movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:29 AM
3

That late night conversation scene with Tom, and Nicole was peak cinema. Them being a real life couple, adds a chemistry that helps layer the nuance of that scene.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:24 AM
2

Great choices
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 02:20 AM
3

Just because you did it, doesn't make it the right move. His relationship troubles with her were based solely on the nature of a grooming pedophile. That's not indicative of anything else beside abhorrent deviant behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 12:49 AM
0

You can't separate any of those parts away from the central relationship in the movie that was pedophilia.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:52 PM
3

Beautifully sad movie
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:34 PM
1

Or maybe not
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:33 PM
1

I mean......Jigsaw did have girlfriend, so he was doing something right.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:31 PM
2

Loved midsommar because of that, there are no protagonists in that movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:30 PM
2

So you didn't the movie, got it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:27 PM
5

Dead Poet society would definitely resonate with this board. I was going to suggest Invisible Man by Ellison, as their are minorities on this board that could easily relate to " The narrator" living in the American Patriarchy. Another movie to add " Falling Down" which is the movie that boosted White male fragility, which ultimately spawned incels, and MGTOW.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:26 PM
1

Relationships are an informal social contract, that is until you become married, in which case it is a formalized structured contract. All contracts are a form of manipulation, as are all Relationships. Generally the older person has more power in those relationships, but not always. It is the responsibility of the person that has more power to not use that to gain undue influence. Most age gap relationships that don't form through grooming are ethical. Of course there are some that aren't, but …
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:26 PM
1

Apps are for when they're bored, both women and men will choose they people they meet in real life, over an app. It's just easier for a woman to get more IRL attention than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:37 PM
1

That's not what anyone wrote. OP put the metric at 35 making 80k. The comment I responded to put the metric at 42, and making money ( needs to be rich). I'm not rich, and I know other guys that fall within the same bracket as I am, and they do fine with younger women, even though we aren't rich, we are far from it. Let's address the topic that you brought up, that of the avg guy older guy being able to date younger women. Anyone that has ever worked service industry in a restaurant can personall…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 06:03 PM
4

You're speaking truth to power with that statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 02:54 PM
1

I don't know, my statement was about prenups in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 01:57 PM
7

This entire sub can be summarized down to : stop being a jerk,and touch grass.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 01:41 PM
3

It's already declining, both men and women are tired of the bot farms, and pay to play dating algorithm that these apps use.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:19 AM
6

Most multimillionaire men are married.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:16 AM
4

Pre nup are not iron clad, they're just the opening Salvo of a divorce settlement.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:14 AM
5

I'm 44 and get hit on by women from 20's-50's. I make more than average men my age, but I'm not rich by any means
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:11 AM
6

I actually know guys like you're describing, that pulled women in their 20's, and they weren't even within sniffing range of 80k. This is very common in restaurant staff.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 09:04 AM

That's because you read bad stats from dubious sources. https://gitnux.org/women-cheating-statistics/ https://ifstudies.org/blog/who-cheats-more-the-demographics-of-cheating-in-america These are well known stats, not sure where you're getting your info from. The only quibble I have with the numbers is that even these are too low in my estimation. People lie, to themselves and don't consider it cheating to justify their actions. As women are held to higher moral standing by our culture.I believe …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 11:50 PM
0

I have a 1 yr old, he gets excited and laughs hysterically when I throw small pillows at him, everyday all the time. I have a 23 yr old that gets excited whenever I send her a Playlist, or new music/artists I discover. Interestingly, the people that seem to be the best parents, are usually excellent dog owners, and people that are excellent pet owners, usually end up being great parents. It's almost as if there's a common dominator of love, and compassion that make these two groups on a Venn Dia…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 08:12 PM
5

Most men have lots of opportunities for casual sex, they just choose to not take those options.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:59 PM

About that..... https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.newsnationnow.com/health/cdc-teens-less-sex/amp/ They're even having less sex than their older siblings did in the 2010s.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:44 PM

I'm probably close to your parents age (44) , yeah you guys are pretty boring. I don't complain to my kids about it, because that's what our generation wanted for you guys. That's what you were taught to do. We just forgot to teach you that life requires balance. That tramp stamp tattoo that your mom illegally got in Myrtle Beach during spring break when she was 16. She didn't want you to do that. She just forgot that it was part of the story that made her who she is, and indirectly lead to you.…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:38 PM

They both did, girls are also dating considerably less than their mothers, and grandmother's did.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:11 PM

It did stop the previous generation, careers were just easier to get back then. Even with that being easier to attain. An 18yr Olds life back then was very different from a 30 yr Olds life. I bring that data point up, because it illustrates something. It seems like data manipulation to me. The age cohorts are not standard across the study, thus skewing results. If they were to use 5 yr cohorts, then you'd gather much more relative information about what's happening. This becomes clearer when you…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 07:00 PM

It's weird, people in previous generations complained about teens having poor values,and teen pregnancy. Now people are complaining because the kids listened, and have better values, and less teen pregnancy. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:43 PM

That data is deeply flawed, it falls apart when you look at, and start asking questions. A big one is: Why are they putting high school seniors in the same grouping as men with careers, and a mortgage?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:39 PM
0

Except you used BMI to make your point Regulatory capture is real, this is just not an example of it. "Big" Sugar didn't lobby anyone to change the BMI scale.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:23 PM
0

No.....no it isn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:24 PM
9

Ehh, you're wrong on that one. They shifted BMI the other way, they changed the scale so that now more people are in the overweight category. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4890841/ In 1998 the NIH dropped the normal weight/overweight cutt off from 27 to 25. BMI isn't even a good indicator of overall health. All these skinny fats walking around here, and they can't even run a 5k, or do a pull up, with poor cardiovascular health. So basically what I'm saying is....You're full of shi…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:11 PM
2

There's a saying: If you hear hoof beats, think horses, not Zebras. Is it porn or is it..... a never-ending infotainment cycle that has a motto of "If it bleeds it leads", underemployment, student loan debt, cost of living, work/life balance, run away inflation, poor diet, medication,or mental health. That thundering herd of Mustangs charging right us, and they still think it's a Zebra .
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:53 PM
1

This isn't gathered from online experiences. Social media isn't indicative of real life, and this sub in particular is very often delusional, and pulls towards the extremes on any relationship or gendered issue. I'm pulling from real life. https://www.marriage.com/advice/infidelity/what-is-inappropriate-flirting-when-married/#:~:text=Flirting%20can%20be%20harmless%20and,flirting%20might%20have%20unexpected%20outcomes. My social circle is mostly women, so I get to see into their world in a way th…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 02:41 PM
1

I'm not referring to individual women, I know women that don't need the outside validation. I'm referring to the bulk of women. It's a part of the way that our society socializes women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 03:50 AM
1

I'm not them, I'm not a maladaptive woman hater.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 12:20 AM
1

She said ironically
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 12:10 AM
0

Forest;trees
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 02:38 PM
-1

It not just what I think, it's the reality of our situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 02:22 PM
4

Excellent answer, I have a female best friend. The relationship we have is very different from the relationship that have with a romantic interest.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 09:34 AM
-1

While I recognize outliers exist, and that this board is full of men, and women that are perfect unicorns. Yours is the response that is indicative of how the general populace of women think. Women have been socialized in our culture to put an emphasis on physical beauty. There's a multi trillion dollar industry dedicated to tell women that they aren't pretty enough. So that they buy more product to attract attention to themselves. One of the things that older women talk about as they get into t…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 09:31 AM
2

The dissonance is loud, and you still can't hear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 07:02 AM
2

The most I was referring to, was that most men don't have sexual dysfunction. I'm also not defending porn, I'm pointing out the real culprit. If you got rid of all the porn in the world. You would still have the same problems in relationships and society because the problems that lead to impulsive porn viewership would still be there. They would just choose another destructive way to cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:43 AM
1

Race play is just racism, and you can't be turned gay. You're either gay or you're not. You can't train yourself to be gay by watching porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:36 AM
2

Most young men don't have an issue, but with how common some of these meds are prescribed. With a 27% sexual side effects, that's millions of men that have medically related sexual dysfunction.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:34 AM
1

That's oddly specific, you have interesting and niche taste in porn, no judgement friend. Your question illustrates what I'm referring to. That's a sexual identity issue, they're probably wrestling with latent homoerotic desires. When you try to compartmentalize your life if creates severe problems. The porn isn't the problem, wrestling with sexual identity is the problem in the scenario you listed.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:24 AM
1

My agenda is to shed a light on the already scientifically debunked idea that porn causes ED, and sexual deviance. If your relationship falls apart because your partner chooses porn over you. It wasn't the porn that was the problem. It was the person viewing the porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:18 AM
2

Young men can't possibly be stressed, or have mental health issues, or be on medications that cause ED, and inability to orgasm https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-reduce-sexual-side-effects-1067490 Oh wait......
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 06:14 AM
1

Kids aren't also choosing porn over real life intimacy. As you pointed out, kids start watching porn long before they are sexually active with a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:55 AM
2

Bdsm isn't a regular part of most people sexual repertoire.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:52 AM
1

Cool, but most people aren't doing all that. Most people aren't having porn sex, even the gen Z crowd.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:50 AM
1

We have a relationship built on trust, and common respect. She comes to me for advice on different things because she had the benefit of growing up very differently than I did. She also didn't know who the guy was because she didn't meet him through social media, before she accepted the flight and tickets to go to his game, she called me to ask if I knew anything about him. I had previously warned her to be wary of pro athletes, because I used to hangout with some, and know their habits. This gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:48 AM
1

No, the lack precedes the porn reliance.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:27 AM
1

Wait until you find out the usual way that plays out in real life. It's normally initiated by the woman, not the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:25 AM
2

No, it's way down the list. Like almost everyone else, you jumped to porn, instead of the larger, and more recognized reason ED exists, it's psychological, and medical.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:24 AM
1

All serial killers drink water, does water consumption cause serial killings? More importantly, of all the men that watch dark porn, how many of them commit any kind of crime?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:18 AM
2

It may not come from you, there are external stressor outside of your relationship that could be causing it. It could also an internal stressor that he's imposed upon himself. I also never said that the intimacy loss was caused by the partner, that's your own inference. You've also skipped over another part of the equation. I specifically noted emotional, and physical intimacy. You being horny all the time only addresses the physical. I'm not implying that you're not doing enough to maintain emo…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:14 AM
1

That theory has been tested in the U.S. and the results were different from the European study that made that claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:00 AM
1

None of that is true
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:58 AM
0

That stance comes from a study that was isolated to Europe, and the results in other regions like the U.S. did not reproduce the same results on multiple attempts. Some of the studies even showed an increase in T levels of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:58 AM
1

That's the real answer
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:50 AM
2

Addiction doesn't come out of nowhere, there's a reason the individual has a lack of control, or chooses to go down that path.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:47 AM
1

I know my daughter, I also gave her a lecture on how she did it, because it was immature the way she handled the situation. Fame and money don't impress her, she was around people with money from a very young age. One of her closest friends growing up was from a family that owned two infrastructure companies, 3 mines, a few golf courses, and a port. Insane wealth isn't something that impresses us.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 01:42 AM
2

What you're talking about has more to do with having with sex, than porn viewership. Jack hammer is the only thing know how to do until they get more experience. Sex Ed class doesn't people how to fuck. Also,men don't like porn screeches, that's what women do because they watched porn, read literotica, or watched it in a movie. That does nothing for men, and we hate it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 12:37 AM
2

It's more than that, most men will still love and desire their partner if they gain weight. It's the emotional scars that cause lack of intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:39 PM
2

I've had the exact opposite experience with Gen Z. They are sexually normative, in fact they're having less sex than we did, and being smarter about it. You're doing the same thing our parents said about us "kids these days are out of control" meanwhile they were the generation that had key parties, and made playboy magazine an iconic staple. Next thing you'll be doing is yelling at kids to get off your lawn, and complain about the nowadays.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:37 PM
2

Are you ready for this, women have autonomy. It's OK for women (or men)to not be in the mood for sex. Or the partner may not be available for sex at that time. Thus 70% of men can be married, and 70% can view porn, without it being an "or" choice. Wait until you see the numbers for women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:32 PM
2

Most men don't have ED, and even virgin men understand that porn isn't the reality. Like I've stated previously in this thread, most guys are vanilla, and they aren't trying to recreate extreme sex adventures 5. Most men need to be comfortable, just like women before they share their kinks, and indulgences.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:27 PM
1

I didn't, as choosing porn over your partner damages the other person, and it will ruin the relationship for the other person. That's a secondary cause, not the primary. The primary is whatever caused the initial lack of intimacy. It could've been a completely internal thing like not dealing with mental health issues. Or it could be a response to an external factor created by the partner or other party, that's on a micro level. At the macro level, the existence of our current porn model is due t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 08:22 PM
3

You want real numbers, let's get some https://nomas.org/prostitution-key-facts-and-analysis-in-brief/ According to this link, only 16% of men have used a prostitute in their lifetime . https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/wbna51335501 According to this, it's about 1% of men yearly that are using prostitutes. U.S. population would bring that to about 2 million regular users per year. Meanwhile 120 million men per year are watching porn (69%). The avg male adult( 68%) is married. …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:52 PM
3

That's an argument that can be made, but even that argument is treating porn as the cause. From an outward systemic view, porn is still just a symptom of the larger disease at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:34 PM
5

There are many studies that are critical of porn, and they're easy to find. What are you talking about right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:28 PM
2

They're trying just as hard as they were in the past.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:25 PM
3

A lot isn't a specific number, and this debate is centered around the male populace, and porn consumption. You're stating that most men that watch porn are going to choose porn, over real life intimacy .
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:23 PM
1

Outliers exist in all things,but let's pull at this thread. Did anything else in your life change around the same time? Were you taking any medications? If so, did you change any medications, or dosage?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:18 PM
4

Most men aren't avoiding all that effort. Despite what pop culture, and a flawed study suggests. Men are still seeking intimacy and relationships with women, even though it's the harder option, because it's the more rewarding option.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:15 PM
3

Uhhh, I grew up around that lifestyle. I'm intimately aware of how it works on every level. From Pimps,Johns, strippers,OF,yachting, and street walkers,human trafficking,party girls,dog fights,dopeboys,shot callers,and heavies. The interplay of all those things,billionaires down to crackhead. I know where the money goes, and most guys aren't using prostitutes.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:11 PM
3

Back in the old days, scientists told us that porn created rapist. As porn viewership has gone up, rape/ SA has gone down. Wake up please
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:04 PM
2

The symptom of a disease can be horrendous, but if all we do is treat symptom,the disease still persists.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 07:00 PM
4

The average female will accommodate what the average man wants, because the average guy is vanilla. Most men don't use prostitutes, and the men that do use prostitutes, are normally having vanilla sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:57 PM
2

I didn't say substituting porn for intimacy was healthy, doing that will ruin your relationship. It still wasn't the root cause though, and that root cause will manifest itself in another way that will still kill the relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:55 PM
3

How many men are foregoing interaction in the real world? It's a very miniscule number, and far fewer than the number of men that watch porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:50 PM
3

You're also the first person to address the longer, and more thoroughly fleshed out part of my thesis, the medical causes. Which I think encapsulates the polemics on this issue. The medical/psych end of it is really being ignored by pop culture because it's a very telling sign of our culture, instead of some moral evil that can be used as political talking point. On top of that, the over medicating is causing the karen/Kyle epidemic. Mood stabilizer long term usage is causing an increase in " we…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:45 PM
1

Nope, when you address the underlying problem of an addiction, it stops becoming an addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:37 PM
2

No............, extreme outliers exist, but this isn't normative of the avg guy that watches porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:35 PM
5

New studies show that abstinence is not the most effective form of reversing any addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:29 PM
5

Death grip, and too much masturbation has been debunked for a long time. You're treating porn addiction as the primary problem when it's not.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:27 PM
4

Closest response thus far, like I stated in the OP. It's the loss of emotional, and physical intimacy that causes someone to rely on porn. It isn't porn causing the loss of emotional,physical intimacy of the partner that initiated the withdrawal.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:23 PM
2

So is porn the problem, or is it the refusal to fix what's causing the reliance.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:19 PM
8

Porn isn't the disease, it's the symptom. He has an underlying problem that he's masking through porn usage at a level that interferes with his relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:17 PM
4

No....that theory has never held up under scientific scrutiny. Most porn consumption by men is heteronormative, and vanilla. Men aren't going around trying to fist women elbow deep. The sex game most guys have is confined to missionary, doggy, cowgirl, and if they're feeling really spicy, reverse cowgirl. The vast majority of men are vanilla.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 06:15 PM
1

I do agree with this statement. The hot girl/ pillow princess venn diagram is often a flat circle. The epileptic dolphin sounding porn moans, do not in fact increase the mood while your imitating Patrick Starr in the sleeping position.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:23 PM
2

A rich young pro athlete with an impeccable social record. 2 superbowl rings, and his next contract is going to be even bigger than his current one. Was trying to date my daughter who is a model that is starting to gain some traction( NY agencies are requesting interviews, sending contracts, she's done some testing for Zara, and Valentino) she's not rich, and his wealth could have provided a halo effect, that might have even helped her career. She turned him down, that's not the only pro athlete…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 05:17 PM
3

You're entire premise falls apart when actually look at real world single income high earner families. The breadwinners work doesn't end when they get home. They are still expected to participate in child rearing, and household upkeep. Then there's the weekend "honey do" list. The division of labor in which provider is treated like liege lord of the manor,and SAHP is domestic servant, has never existed outside of a small percentage of New England WASP families. Parents love their children, and d…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/24 04:50 PM

No
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/24 05:57 AM
5

Tit for Tat isn't always applicable because not everyone is at the same economic,social,intellectual,psychological maturity level. Relationships requires you to give grace to the other person at times. You're never going to have a long successful relationship if you keep a balance sheet.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 06:38 PM
2

Absolutely, especially when you consider that feminism isn't a homogenous blend. There are multiple schools of thought in feminism. 3rd, and 4th wave are different from classical feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 12:10 AM
6

30 yr old men are still attractive to a large portion of college aged women. 30 yr old women are still very much in demand for men of every age from 22-50. They have no problem getting serious male attention from men that want marriage and family. The reason that men at 30 become much more suitable for marriage, is because life has given them more time to farm XP and level up. Most 21 yr old men haven't lived, and are pretty boring. By the time I was 21, I had already lived a couple lifetimes wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 05:43 PM
5

The thing is, there is no problem. It's a result of data manipulation that appears throughout the study. Just like their age cohorts. They put high school seniors in the same statistical bracket as men that have careers, and a mortgage. They use a 12 year cohort only for this group, and they don't standardize the same gap in the 2 other cohorts. A 5 yr cohort would have been a much better tool ( 18-23,24-29,30-35 etc) the dating problems of an 18 yr old, are not going to be the same as a 27 yr o…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 05:30 PM
6

Those other studies use PEW as the backbone, or part of their meta study. They have the same flaws as PEW, bad inputs will only yield bad outputs. I get tired of dissecting the flaws because it's a long list, and makes a long post. I'll give you one example though, median age of first marriage for men is 30 yrs old. By 30, half of all men are married. According to the research most men are single at 29, but suddenly half of them are married by their 30th birthday. Which is weird because usual co…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:37 PM
2

2 things, 1 in 3 being deficient means that 2/3 are not. Indicating that deficiency isn't the normative state, and is irregular. The other is that iron deficiency doesn't usually lead to lethargy unless it's severe, most cases of women being deficient aren't that severe. One of my daughters was iron deficient, and she played 3 sports. So it isn't a catch all term, there's levels.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:26 PM
3

Nope it is not, chronic fatigue has an underlying issue that causes it. The usual culprits are anemia, or vitamin D deficiencies that are severe. It's not normal to experience chronic fatigue, and is a very alarming symptom.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:05 PM
2

Lawyer for the win, thanks for responding.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 04:00 PM
6

No her male equivalent would be a 5'7 skinny guy that's an introvert.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:54 PM
6

Not really, the testerone wouldn't fix the underlying lethargy problem. Being constantly tired isn't a normal state for women, so it wouldn't change if she suddenly became male.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:53 PM
3

They aren't anymore, but they were 5 years ago. Everyone with back pain had an opiate prescription. I also work in the insurance industry. There's a lot more people on oxy's than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:39 PM
0

I'm just waiting for the inevitable class action lawsuit when the other shoe drops. Messing with the satiation signal long term must have side effects. There's a specific type of diabetes that's only caused by cancer, or medically related. There's also reports of stomach, and intestinal paralysis. I feel like this was rushed for approval for non diabetics. Nature doesn't have shortcuts, there's no magic bullet to fix obesity. We've been through this dance so many times before, it feels predatory…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:22 PM
0

So aware of things that they're joining the yt supremacy pipeline. Falling for crypto scams, joining cults, and advocating for eugenics. Those are all losing philosophies, with all their awareness they should be able to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 03:05 PM
-1

Sure, you've labeled the wrong group as the NPC's
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:56 PM
5

That's a very misleading statement, that gen Z is more likely to have negative leanings towards feminism. There's a slight bump, but they're still in the minority of Gen Z
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:49 PM
4

It's very much colonization of someone else's organic movement, after ignoring their cries for help because it didn't benefit grads from Sarah Lawrence.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:41 PM
8

Always this singles argument, that study was misleading, a full of errors. With a very narrow definition of counting as being in a relationship, with an even more narrow temporal clause.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:07 PM
1

Except they're getting it backwards, thinking that the effect is the cause.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 02:02 PM
9

There are dramatic cultural, and social differences between the U.S. are S.Korea. Beyond that, the 4B movement isn't even very popular there. Their housing market is more fucked than ours. Income disparity between rich and everyone else is higher than ours. They have a higher level of chauvinism than we do. We've been viewing this through a myopic western lens. This is what happens when feminism only cares about the problems of white upper class women that went to Ivy League schools. They don't …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 01:59 PM
2

If you date, or would date black men in particular, or minority men in general. You need to read Invisible man by Ralph Ellison.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 01:36 AM
5

Let's put this to bed, a woman's beauty is not the most important thing to a man, just like being tall isn't the most important thing to a woman. The average adult woman in the U.S. is married. The average woman is overweight, and is not a stunning beauty. Both men, and women value other traits above physical beauty. Do you know which demographic of women has the highest marriage rate, and marriage success rate? It's women with degrees by a landslide. There are a whole lot of gorgeous women that…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/24 01:28 AM

If you want a solid, long lasting relationship. You have to be vulnerable, it's the risk that you must take in order to find someone that is a good relationship partner. The thing is, a very large segment of the female populace are not ready to accept an emotionally vulnerable man.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:44 PM
24

Covid messed up the socialization of a large chunk of that generation. I think it's just that too many zoomers lack the social skills to get someone to fuck them(men and women).
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:34 AM

It's because boy bands, and girl bands cater to the same demographic ( girls,and the lgbtq community). There are no girl groups in any genre( except baby metal) that has a targeted demographic of men. When they do, they are usually successful
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 09:47 PM
1

Which is why I say that they want vulnerability through their lens, and not real vulnerability.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 09:26 PM
10

Sure, there have been men on here that talk about how they were dumped after the cried over the death of a loved one. They want you to talk about your grief, they don't actually want to see it. They want to be held when they cry, but don't want to date a man that cries. This is the intersection where performative masculinity, and performative feminity meet.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 02:07 AM
11

The best way to think of it is that women want vulnerability is the female gaze. What women want is a narrow bandwidth of performative vulnerability which validates their schema of the nurturing aspect of femininity.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 01:11 AM
12

Yeah.....that doesn't change anything. I wonder if there's an attribute that makes them more desirable than other groups?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 05:59 PM
0

You're halfway there, this is a true statement. The problem is that you guys are going to nightclubs, when you should be going to conversation bars, or bars that are smaller music venues. Nightclubs are the drive thru fast food of social interaction. Conversation bars level the playing field because " just be hot" doesn't work when you have to spend more than 2 minutes talking to someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 04:33 PM
37

The crazy part is that men overwhelmingly choose women with degrees over all other demographics of women, and it's been that way since they started tracking the Stat. It's actually the most stable demographic Stat that we have in the U.S. , since 1969 to present. Women with degrees have a 68-70% marriage total, the yearly fluctuation stays within that threshold. On top of that, they have the highest percentage of long term marriage (20+ years). So when the bearded Podcaster says that men don't c…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 04:26 PM
1

No......bars are a 3rd space, you're just going to the wrong ones, bartenders knowing your drink order isn't a trope, it's a real thing. Sounds like you're mostly going to nightclubs. Switch to conversation bars, and watch your success rate increase. Social clubs don't exist? Tell that to VFW, motorcycle clubs, larpers, the massive running, and cycling communities. The D&D clubs, chamber of commerce young professionals mixers. Amongst the many others I haven't mentioned. Lastly, on to your part …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 04:18 PM
1

No....that's not how it works.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 03:28 PM
0

We do have more 3rd spaces, you just choose not to go to them. College itself isn't really a 3rd space. The bars, social clubs, and parties are the 3rd spaces. All those exist post college, nearly every town has a few bars. If yours doesn't, the town 15 minutes away does. Most people aren't choosing cellphone virtual life, over real life. Thinking that they are, is the real chronically online take.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 03:27 PM
2

Church groups,hobbyist groups,social clubs, adult rec leagues, public parks.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:28 PM
5

I didn't say change, I advised expanding, those 2 things are different.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:26 PM
1

Public 3rd spaces designed for social interaction
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:15 PM
-3

That's not what women are saying. They are saying to choose an appropriate venue, and read the room before deciding to approach.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:10 PM
12

Expanding your social circle puts you in more contact with available women/men. It also opens the door for you to demonstrate that you have a desirable personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:05 PM
1

There are a plethora of 3rd spaces, y'all are too socially avoidant to go to them. There are more 3rd spaces available now, than there were when you parents met.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/24 02:02 PM

Ask your male friends what would happen if they tried to use a women's restroom. It's a lot different from what you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 02:34 PM

It does happen often, I've seen it many times. I've even seen women using urinals in a men's restroom. As men, we don't really care, and understand that the women's restroom line is long because of women spend more time in the act of urinating than men, adjusting their outfits/looks, and using the privacy of the stalls to snort cocaine. It's one of those social contract things that we innately understand without thinking about it. When you do think about it, there's a blatant hypocrisy at play. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 02:29 PM
1

I'm a millenial that's in this current dating market. Even though online dating is part of the relationship matrix, not much has really changed since the 90's. I know this will be a shocking statement, but every generation has been saying "nowadays " since the 1900s. The thing is, if you look at old newspaper opinion articles from the 1900s, you'll see men and women complaining about the same things back then as they do now. With just as much ferocity. The kind of men that were successful with w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/24 07:55 AM
12

Not to mention the sure entitlement the guy thinks he has to his dates emotional, and physical space. He paid for a service, he will expect something in return. The app developer can dress it up in whatever flowery language they want. It's still an escorts service.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:26 AM
1

I get it, the word "submissive " is throwing you off because it has a negative Connotation. Submissive wife isn't slavery. They have careers,friends,and autonomy. The average married woman is a submissive wife, they just don't use that nomenclature. It's just like in bdsm/kink relationships, the Domme isn't the one in control, it's the submissive that's really running the show. In a submissive household, if the man isn't fulfilling his duties appropriately. A submissive wife will divorce him, an…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/24 01:19 AM
1

That's how consent of the governed works, I'm sorry that you don't understand that submission only works because they enter into it willing. Forced obeisance is exploitation, not submission.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/24 11:59 PM
3

Men aren't mad at women, random npc's on social media are mad at women. Social media is not indicative of real life. As for the first part of the question, it's neutral, neither add or takeaway.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:28 PM
3

It's UCSB, a place that isn't demographically representative of the country https://www.collegefactual.com/colleges/university-of-california-santa-barbara/student-life/diversity/ California is heavily skewed, and not representative of the U.S, or broader world population.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 02:12 PM
3

OF, and influencers don't really have that much power in real life. They don't determine, or influence who we date. Most men don't use OF, and influencers flex their power through their influence on women. If you look at any popular influencer, you'll notice that normally have 2x the number of women followers, than they do men.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 01:41 PM
2

I think that they probably wouldn't like it. Hentai/animated porn is popular because of the fantastical things that can be done with a medium that you understand is not real. Having something that portrays itself as real, destroys the allure.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 01:34 PM
2

As someone wrote earlier, the attractive men that had success with women in their 20's. Will probably still be attractive and have success with women in their 40s. So yeah, an attractive in shape man with a sharp personality in his 40s. Will be attractive to younger women. The part that this sub doesn't understand. Is that most men aren't going to fit that profile in their 40s. I still get lots of attention from younger women, and understand that I'm an outlier.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 06:53 AM
1

Bad bet only 30% of marriages end I'm divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 10:59 PM
2

Is that most of the women that file ppo's? You're conflating being a victim of crime, as normalization. If that's the case then all illegal activities are normalized, and you have a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 08:29 PM
2

Threats and unwanted physical proximity is enough to get a PPO, and put him the radar of LEO. As for my friend, the police made contact with him immediately, and opened up an investigation. A victims advocate contacted my friend, and so did the police. She didn't cooperate with them. After the police went to his house, she figured that was enough. Even though the police, and victim advocate told her it wasn't enough. This is a very common thing that happens, I think it's due to smart women being…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:31 PM
3

As a man, I can tell you that men don't brag about, or admit to things like violence towards women, and rape. They don't do that because they know the consequences of that action would be detrimental. Look at the way social ostracization of men on the sex offenders registry is normalized. This completely disproves your thesis. No one is telling you to ignore your impulse to choose the bear. You should be cognizant of social situations with men, considering that adult women can be overpowered by …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 07:04 PM
3

Is that the problem, or is the problem that in some cases it's hard to prove that she's being stalked. A guy put an air tag in my friends car. The police responded immediately because she had proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 06:42 PM
3

Is there no penalty for men being violent toward women? Is it socially acceptable by society at large? Is it socially acceptable amongst men? Do men brag about being violent towards women to other men? In public, do men intervene when women are being violently assaulted by men? Normalized would mean that all those things would be standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 03:47 PM
2

I'm not one of those, I believe in mixed economies. I'd like a lot more publicly funded things ( education,healthcare,childcare,UBI, etc) I also have a deep understanding of politics, economics, and sociology. You're moving along because you can't provide a rebuttal to anything I wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 03:36 PM
2

Somehow, you didn't pick up on the message I was conveying. Instead you went on a diatribe to explain to me what I already know, and was the intent to create cognitive dissonance. You must be real fun at parties. I also see you flair, to this I respond with the following: Capitalism requires a slave class,communism requires a racist class,Where's the difference ? Marx and Engels were racist, just like most white European intellectuals of their time. Their private correspondence was full of slurs…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 02:58 PM
5

Forest;trees
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:57 PM
3

Thought experiment for you, the U.S. economy is skyrocketing. The most robust system on the planet. All the indicators that we use to measure it, tell us that we are living in an economic golden age. Does it feel like it? If you don't feel that this is the best economy of the modern era, and reality says that it is. Then the correct reaction is to shut up, and ignore the feeling that it isn't. Feelings are just as valid as facts. Your flair is red pill, there is no data that can be found to just…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:40 PM
1

History, every group has been infiltrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/24 01:25 PM
3

They dog whistle it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 07:38 PM
1

https://www.deseret.com/2023/4/27/23700974/do-dating-apps-actually-work/#:~:text=A%20poll%20through%20YouGov%20had,a%20hobby%20or%20through%20school. Here's more proof that most people aren't meeting online. This is from 2023, which illustrates that online dating isn't trending at nearly the rates as that graph supports. Online dating isn't as popular as it used to be, that's why they're going to paid models.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:56 PM
7

It generally is not, blue pill offers the same advive
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:44 PM
0

No, the other guys post says that 60% of relationships start online. Mine shows the opposite happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 01:42 PM
5

That's not exclusive to red pill theology.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:58 PM
11

Any advice that doesn't center around improving oneself is worthless.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 06:33 AM
2

Settling isn't a real thing
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 04:38 AM
-1

Forest;trees
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:22 AM
5

You're right, if you're unattractive physically and mentally at 21, you're probably not going to be physically, and mentally attractive at 40. If you do something to improve yourself like lose weight, get therapy, change your social circle, find your life rudder. Then you'll definitely be more attractive at 40. Your math is off, if men are in their prime 18-25. Why is age of first for men 30?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:21 AM
3

It exists, and is unfortunately all too common. One scenario I remember was a friend and I were waiting at the bar to grab some drinks. 2 young women were behind us, and started talking to us, within 30 seconds of talking they suggested we get them drinks. That's not how we operate, we don't buy random women drinks, we told them No. They went off the rails, talking about how we should buy them drinks because they're hot( they were mid at best, and that's probably a boost from dim bar lighting) w…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:14 AM
-2

The wall doesn't exist for any gender, it's just something people made up to bring the other genders down. People usually date within their age cohort. So a woman in her late 30s is still going to be attractive to men in their late 30s, and so on. Both older men, and women are attractive to a sizable population of the younger groups. It's all about whether or not you take care of yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 03:04 AM
8

The same thing happens with younger childless women. Women aren't used to rejection so they often handle it badly. I can't even count the amount of times I've called a homophobic slur because I rejected a woman. It's their go to move when their ego is bruised.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 02:55 AM
3

So am I
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 08:25 PM
0

No because your link shows that 36 is now the age where homeownership reach 50%. At 36, 68 percent of men have already crossed that marriage threshold. So there's a 6 year difference amounting to a 20% increase between marriage, and homeownership in temporal terms. A 20% change is well beyond margin of error. You're also wrong about your claim that only 50% of U.S. adults are married https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2021/10/05/rising-share-of-u-s-adults-are-living-without-a-spouse-or-pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:58 PM
2

Increase in age of first marriage, doesn't mean people aren't getting married, they're just delaying it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:38 PM
2

Nope, around 30% of people that get married will get divorced
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:37 PM
0

You wrote all that, to not disprove anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:34 PM
7

Your friend was a shitty parent, and his ex wife was able to prove it in court.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:04 PM
3

I'm also talking about right now, not yesteryear. In this current dating climate, half of all men are married by 30.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 07:03 PM
4

You lose the ability to pay for your home, divorce doesn't take away your kids. If your spouse earns as much as you, then you aren't going to lose the pension, or 401k.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:50 PM
11

50/50 is default in most, and even in the ones that they are not. When men sue for full, or majority custody they usually win. You're pushing an unfounded narrative. Most divorces are settled before you even go before a judge.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:46 PM
6

When and where did I say that?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:43 PM
10

Nope, that's not true at all, 50/50 is default custody in most states. In order for the custody to be different, both parties either have to agree in a change to parenting time, or one party has to prove that the other is unfit in some capacity to have equal time. So whenever you hear a man or woman say that they got fucked over in court about their parenting/child custody. It's a blatant lie, because the courts don't even want to be involved in those decisions, so they set the bar very high whe…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:29 PM
14

Nope, most states have 50/50 default custody.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:24 PM
9

Do you have a job? The odds of being without a job over the course of your life, are higher than getting divorced. So then why work? Job loss is just as detrimental as getting a divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:23 PM
13

No, that's not how the modern Court works. In 50/50 custodial cases, the parent making more money pays support. Men usually make more money than women, I do know guys that made less, and so the ex wife had to pay CS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:20 PM
9

Men being arrested more for violent crime, isn't the same as men being more violent. If you've ever seen women fight each other. You'll know that they are equally violent. Perhaps moreso, as men generally stop fighting when there is a clear victory, women do not. There's also the discipline gap, boys receive harsher punishment than girls when they commit the same offenses.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:17 PM
9

50% of marriages do not end in divorce, that study got retracted by the authors when they got called out on their shitty math. If 1 million people get married in a calendar year that 500k people get divorced. That's not the same thing as how many of those 1 million couples that got married in that calendar year, ended up getting a divorce. The overwhelming bulk of the 500k divorces, came from marriages that occurred 5+ years prior. The real number is around 30% of all marriages will end in divor…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 06:12 PM
0

Succinylcholine subcutaneous injection between the toes. Looks like a hear attack, most places don't have a coroner that will test for it, because it breaks down to other components that appear as naturally occuring in the body/s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:45 PM
3

In order for it to be a sarcastic retort, it needs to have semblance to the original. The 68% is men by age 35, do 66% of men own a home by age 35? More importantly is the age of first purchase, as age of first marriage for men is 30. By 30 50% of men are married, are 50% of 30 yr old men homeowners? The last bit is actually relevant only to marriage, not housing. There are too many people that are unrealistic about themselves. It's much easier to improve yourself, than it is to improve your fin…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:28 PM
0

It's actually a very small number, they just a megaphone to complain. Something that I've noticed in life, and social media in particular: unhappy people complain more than happy people brag. If your life is good, those things that make it that way are commonplace for you, it just becomes routine, no one brags about routine. The unhappy people would kill for what the happy take for granted.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 05:10 PM
-1

People change on both ends. With things like mental, and physical abuse those signs are usually visible, but get ignored because love blinds people. Most divorces aren't caused by abuse. People change every decade, people grow apart. The things that are important to you in your 20's, are often downgraded, and new things are more important in your 30s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:59 PM
-5

After reading some of these comments, it's clear that a lot of you just want sex slaves. Instead of chasing the manic pixie dreamgirl. Who will not in the end, fit your schema. Find a woman from the kink community. A sub with free use,degradation, bondage, and breeding kink. Free use: sex whenever you want Degradation: your misogyny will be foreplay Breeding kink: self explanatory Bondage: she'll happily wear a chastity belt when you're not around, no need for a paternity test. You're the only p…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:49 PM
4

You think the better option is to have people that despise each other, stay married? "Kitchen fire" deaths will definitely spike.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:37 PM
4

I'm not looking at those long term marriages to determine trends for marriage rate. You need to look at trends for 20's, and 30s. Current age of 1st marriage for men in the U.S. is 30, by 35 68% of men are married. These are current stats, not stats from the 80's.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:34 PM
3

Sure, if you have no assets,property, or children. If you have any of those, it's not an easy option.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:30 PM
4

That already exists, and people still opt for the divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:27 PM
6

68% of men are married, there's no indication that will change in the future. Men aren't opting out, just a few maladaptive individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 04:26 PM
0

The part that you're missing, is that your society created the problem that you're facing, because they failed to deal with it like the U.S. did in the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 12:36 AM
1

The marriage strikes are less than.01% of women in any country. The battle of the sexes has always been this way. Even the bear v man question is recycled from previous years. The part that you don't understand, is that the super majority of people aren't invested in the battle of the sexes. Age of first marriage for men is 30, most men over 25 are married. The vast majority of women and men still want to get married, and have kids. The delusional mumbo jumbo is suggesting that the market is fla…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 11:56 PM
0

I'm very close to them, and they tell me things that they wouldn't tell other people. I'm non judgmental, and very sex positive, and frankly I was a whole in my adventurous youth. So I can't look down on anyone because very few people alive can surpass my debauchery. So they don't mind sharing things with me. They go on dates, and even hookup with randoms. The guys just never make it passed the dating threshold, because they don't bring enough to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 08:51 PM
0

I'm friends with the kinda women that they're talking about. Highly attractive women with a social media presence. They are single because they don't have to accept bare minimum. They want to date, no one worthy has stepped up to the plate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:08 PM
1

Skinnier doesn't mean fitter, the term skinnyfat exists for a reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:05 PM
1

Reading comprehension bruh, there's two different things going on in that paragraph. One of which is a statement about Madmen, the other is a statement about christo-fascist belief structures that never really existed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:03 PM
0

I have a graph also https://www.statista.com/chart/20822/way-of-meeting-partner-heterosexual-us-couples/
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 07:00 PM
3

I know a lot of women like that, some people (myself included) are single by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 06:44 PM
3

You don't get it because you're not a woman of color that has been a victim of their aggressions. They weaponize tears, and play the victim against black and brown women just like they do against men. White men aren't threatened by their presence in the same way white women are. They're overtly mean to woc in ways that white men aren't. If you have any female minority friends, ask them about their experiences. It will be very eye opening for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:17 PM
1

The iPhone wasn't the most important thing that happened in 2007, and social media is a boon for 3rd spaces, not a hindrance. I worked in the service industry for over decade. The easiest way to drive foot traffic is through social media. It's quick,inexpensive and easier than any other method, and it works. The mortgage bubble popped in 2007, which was a result of manufacturing job losses. Our economy hasn't truly recovered since then. Are people spending more time on social media instead of go…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 05:11 PM
4

It's not that they dislike white women, in the same way that women don't dislike men in favor of bears. Women in the scenario are wary of a strange man in the woods because of bad experiences with the unpredictability of men. Likewise, WOC are wary of white women because of the their unpredictability. In social, and professional settings. White men are the bear, white women are the dangerously unpredictable man.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:53 PM
1

There's various studies that show masturbation is a mental illness, music causes crime to increase, and that the economy is good. I can find you stats and studies that can prove, or disprove any point. There are more kids participating in organized sports than there were in my youth. I still see unsupervised kids in the streets and at the parks. Is it that the phone causes social isolation, or is it that introverted person that isolates themselves more likely to spend more time on a phone, than …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:47 PM
2

It's pretty easy to see when 3rd spaces disappeared. It started in 2007, what was the most important thing that happened in 2007?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:38 PM
1

It isn't about a dopamine rush from phones or social media. In fact, you'll notice the 3rd spaces that are thriving have a huge social media presence, and depend on social media marketing to get people in the doors. People still desire to be social with others in these 3rd spaces. The problem is the same thing that is ailing every other aspect of society, it starts and ends with the economy. When the economy is actually good, fertility rates increase, college entry increases, and the service ind…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:29 PM
0

That sounds like you live in a shitty area, maybe you have shit neighbors, but I see kids playing outside all the time. I travel for work, so I'm often in different cities. So I know it's not just where I live. I take walks daily, there's always unsupervised kids at the local skatepark, or sitting by the train tracks, or down by the dams at our river walk. Kids on bikes doing wheelies in the street. Or young people renting those electric scooters, and zipping around town. My son and his friends …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 04:16 PM
0

You're not living in a grounded reality. People are more sedentary in relation to physical fitness, not in relation to social interaction. You're also wrong about dating, most people still meet the old fashioned way, through their real world social network, not from dating apps, or social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:56 PM
2

There's the answer, the state of the economy is the predictor of most outcomes. Less money, means less going out, which means less social interactions.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:52 PM
2

3rd spaces disappeared because people stopped going to them, it wasn't the other way around. They didn't stop going to them because of social media. Social media has the opposite effect on 3rd spaces, it actually drives people to them. People just aren't going, because they want a more relaxed vibe. We're witnessing a decrease in nightclubs, but a rebirth in conversation bars, music venues for local bands, and gastropubs.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:37 PM
2

At 70 hrs, your birthrate is going to be much less than 1.8. When I say negative, I mean that women aren't having enough births to replace themselves as well. Lower than 1.0 births/woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:09 PM
0

You didn't do a good job of googling
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:03 PM
3

Most people aren't having a hard time finding someone to date. Most people are married by 30, and most of those marriages are for life. So my opinion is grounded in reality, and backed up by fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 03:02 PM
0

Google is free
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:59 PM
8

They think tye TV show mad Men is a documentary, and that their grandmother was a virginal contrite woman. Their grandad spent the weekend with other men clearing forest, and building 'Murica shirtless while reveling with other shirtless barrel chested men in kerchief and jeans. It's their thinly veiled homoerotic leibensraum fantasy worldview. When you venture to the more risqué side of life,and into the kink corners. You'll see that these kind of people are usually cucks that live vicariously …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:59 PM
1

Skinnier, doesn't mean fitter. As a population we smoked more cigarettes, drank more alcohol, and did more illicit drugs back then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:50 PM

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:44 PM
9

When it suits them, women kept their husband's Klan robes clean and starched. They were behind the laws that made it illegal for black women to be unemployed, because they needed domestic workers in their home. Guess who is leading the charge for private religious schools getting vouchers? Guess who was responsible for rolling back Affirmative action in higher education admissions? Guess who hand picked all the conservative judges that were needed to overturn Roe, and is responsible for Trump ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:43 PM

Most men in the U.S. have a full head of hair at 30
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:24 PM
2

If most men in your country are working 70 hrs/per week. Then you're not going to have a 1.8 birthrate. You're going to have a negative birth rate, for reference see Japan.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:18 PM
11

Guess what, they aren't doing that right now either. Podcast bros are the sustenance of the chronically online. Most people aren't chronically online.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:15 PM
0

No, we weren't fitter back then. This is just tradlife propaganda. Kids aren't couch potatoes today. They still go outside, participation in youth sports is higher now, than it was then.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:14 PM
3

I'm willing to bet that N.Koreans work less than S.korea. Having downtime from work stimulates sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:11 PM
3

It's not a bust, there were more babies born during that time period, than the preceding 2 yr span.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:08 PM
6

Your circle doesn't represent the rest of humanity, that's just your lived experience. You think that's it's polarized now, the highest divorce in U.S. history was in the 70s. If you look at print media from 100 years ago, you'll see that men and women were complaining about the same things as they are now, with equal ferocity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 02:07 PM
8

Thinner yes, but so were the men. Fitter, better lookin, and less shallow, not at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:59 PM
12

Algorithms are designed to increase engagement for ad revenue. Always think about that when something pops up on your fyp, or suggested viewing, hate sells more product than love.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:53 PM
-1

I've dated pre social media, and have dated throughout it's evolution. The only thing it has done, is confirmed choice heuristic theory. I know a lot of younger people believe that this dating market is uniquely new, it is not new at all. This is the same kind of dating market that your parents met in. Most people still meet organically, most relationships don't start from online dating. They start from your real life social network. The stats you're referencing, aren't true.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:48 PM
2

If they actually follow through with these promises, there will be a baby boom. As we saw in the U.S. during covid lockdowns, there was a baby boom. When people aren't away from home 50 hours/week, and you have time to cultivate a relationship with your partner/family. The fertility rate jumps. That's all conditional to if....
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:27 PM
31

This isn't the reality for the vast majority of the human populace. This is a chronically online take, that doesn't exist en situ. Most of us understand that digital life isn't real, and it's not indicative of what happens in life. When you actually go out, you'll see people happily interacting with the gender they want to date. Cold approaching a stranger happens in real life, and is largely unremarkable because it's commonplace. Most guys aren't creeps, and most women aren't out to shame men. …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 01:18 PM
1

Even when you control for that, single fathers with sole custody of their children. Abuse less than mothers in all coupling pairs. To put this into perspective, 18% of all child abuse involving children living in a divorced/split home, was committed by a non relative male( boyfriend/stepfather). Whereas 54% of all child abuse was committed by the mother. The birth mom is a higher risk to her children than all possible male combinations.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 04:54 PM
1

Nope, in married households the mother is usually the abuser of children. In divorced living separately households, the mother is usually the abuser. In households with mother,and stepfather. The mother is still usually the abuser. In homes with single father no partner, single mother no partner, the mother is more likely to be abusive than the father. Mothers abuse, and kill their children more than fathers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 03:41 PM
1

Why don't you file if you want out?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:13 PM
3

Why should someone be forced to stay with someone they don't love?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:11 PM
2

In the modern world....? Marriage has always been a property rights contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:09 PM
1

Most people divorce amicably, the idea of the bitter exes fighting, and using the children as weapons against each other isn't how it normally goes.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:05 PM
0

That's not true at all, the highest predictor of abuse is the presence of a mother. Women are the most likely abuser, and killer of their children.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 02:02 PM
1

None of your rebuttals disprove anything I wrote, and aggressive isn't the opposite of introvert. While we're on the subject of "aggressive " being seen as bad for women by men. It's time that we put this idea out to pasture. Confidence is the #1 personality trait that men look for in a woman. It always has been, and always will be. Sure, there are some podcast bros that are into demure women, but that's not representative of the bulk of men. We love aggressive, confident women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 10:21 PM
1

Yeah, you will absolutely get more males saying yes. It's not really hard to understand why. Look at the participation rate in team sports, the most common form of socializing cooperation. There are more males taking part in team sports, than females. You can also see it play out in the discourse on this board. A lone woman is used as a punchline. A lone man is treated as a maladaptive member of society, and a potential threat to our culture. That's because men aren't supposed to be anti social,…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 09:51 PM
1

You can do fancy things to stats, that can get you any result you want on paper. U.S. birth rate is 1.66, Russia birthrate is 1.47. Add in the KIA casualties from Ukraine, and the all the people fleeing. They are in dire straits as a solvent nation. P.s. wait until you figure out that the population decline is why they started the war. The Kremlin knew that the birthrate was going to drop even further, and they have a large elderly sector that is going to die off. They're going to be down to 80-…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 05:53 AM
4

Marriage isn't really in decline, it's being delayed. This is what happens when the economy turns to shit. The same thing happened during the Great Depression, and the recessions of the 70s, 80's, 90's, and the 2010s. If the economy rebounds, age of first marriage will drop rapidly, and family size will increase.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:38 AM
1

Russia doesn't have a higher birth rate, they're having a severe population decline.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/24 04:33 AM
1

2 things, do feelings have to make sense? Of course not, emotions are not logic based. Also, this is a hypothetical situation detached from reality. In a real world situation they aren't going to pick the bear. This is an academic exercise by which women can discern your ability to have empathy, and understanding for their situation. Develop a question that tests the empathy of women. I'll give you one to prime the pump Women, if you had a husband, or son that was a corrections officer, would yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 11:56 PM
1

Wrong question, you need to ask why are genders socialized the way that they are. Like any other system, patriarchy requires consent of the governed. Men are still very much in charge, and steering the ship. To keep patriarchy in rule, you have to give some rewards, and cede powers to women. The patriarchy controls the economic, and political aspects of our lives. They cede the social aspects to women. This is how they get the buy in from women to continue to uphold patriarchy. Girls aren't more…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 10:01 PM
6

I now identify as a Bearcat
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 08:37 PM
12

Stop with all that logic, and nuanced based commenting. We only do generalities based on vilified caricatures of demographics in this sub. It's all binary, and anecdotal evidence from experiences before the frontal context has fully developed.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 07:04 PM
1

That was a swing and a miss on multiple fronts. I do empathize with incels when the subject is about them. The bear question is not about them, it's not centered around them. I get down voted frequently by the man hater contingent on this board, just as much as I do the incel contingent. That's because I have empathy, and knowledge of the opposing viewpoints.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 06:48 PM
1

Will do.....you aren't the only person that grew up in a rough area. I was born into a family of criminals,that was a crime syndicate. Yet I still understand what women are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:50 AM
1

It would've been shorter to just write that you don't understand the reality of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 03:40 AM
0

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:52 AM
-8

They aren't dehumanizing you. It's you that is dehumanizing yourself. You placed yourself as the man they were talking about. When they aren't talking about an individual man.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:36 AM
3

Nope, when you center yourself in the question, that's not empathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:33 AM
0

Offer me something of value to rebut, your claims are devoid of backing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:25 AM
1

Forest;trees
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:23 AM
4

Why should the question be empathetic to men, when it's about women. Likewise, if the question is male centric, it doesn't need to be empathetic toward women. I don't think you all understand what empathy is.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 02:21 AM
-1

No....
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 11:47 PM
1

Cool, I don't live in Venezuela. If I my options are eating two spoonfuls of shit, or one spoonful. I'm still being fed a diet of shit, when I shouldn't be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 11:46 PM
4

You're completely tone deaf, and have ignored the clear messaging. It's about empathy....that's it, and you're failing the test.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:32 PM
2

No you don't, quit your bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:29 PM
-1

No, no, and no some more. You did make one true statement. There was a similar female divestment campaign in the late 70s early 80's. It wasn't very popular, just like 4B isn't popular now. If you refer back to my comment, I pointed out the S.Korean women are dealing with the same issues western women were in the 1980s, so it actually tracks. No one is worried about the estimated 2.5 million mgtow global movement. That's such a marginal number that it will have no effect on any country at all. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:28 PM
3

Not all feminists are great at empathy, and it's not a woman's responsibility to teach men how to interact with women successfully, just like it's not men's responsibility to teach women how to identify fuckboys. That's a parental thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:20 PM
0

You're not as wary of strange women as they are men. You can't be, because the societal, and cultural history of mankind has never been so slanted that it would allow you do so. Forest;trees, wait until you make the connection as to why so many women are getting ccw's.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:15 PM
1

How is posting stats about bear attacks, addressing the underlying feelings women have about a situation? Facts over feelings isn't a valid response. You need to address both the facts, and the feelings in order to deal with a situation. You're ignoring the more important half of the equation. Think of it like this: in the U.S. we currently have a robust, record breaking economy, but does it feel like it?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:11 PM
1

The fear of uncertainty when interacting with strange men. As a man, you are physically more powerful than the 90% of women. Imagine the feeling of walking into a wrestling tournament, where everyone else is a pro mma fighter, and you have the wrestling skillet, and size of 7th grader.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 10:05 PM
15

Winning comment, most married people aren't on social media complaining, or bragging. They have other things to do, like fuck each other, and raise a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:56 PM
-2

Hey friend, this bear vs.man thing isn't really about which is more dangerous. It's about the ability of men to emphasize with the situation that women live with. Posting statistical data that proves bears are actually more dangerous, doesn't demonstrate that you understand what the problem is. This isn't the flex you think it is, it's just proving the point that women are trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 09:47 PM
4

This whole thing is really stupid,this is an intellectual question that if you don't understand why women are picking the bear in the sterile intellectual vacuum of their mind, that's a you problem. In a real life situation if this were to occur, with a real bear, and a random average guy. Most women in real life aren't going to pick the bear. This is a scenario which allows men to have an opportunity to display empathy, or the lack thereof. I'm pretty sure that if one where to scatter plot the …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:58 PM
19

This is an epically bad take in the same vein as western women appropriating the 4B movement ( white women never miss a chance to colonize someones movement, and make it about them, which is why 3rd and 4th wave feminism is so important) there is a gigantic cultural rift between places like the U.S., and S. Korea that make up the circumstances for the gendered problems that exist in S.Korea, that will never make its way across the ocean. 4B doesn't even have a sizable platform in S.Korea. The ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 08:41 PM
2

The women they'd advised you to steer clear of, are the same women that they're going to cheat on their wives with. While they wallow in their miserable marriages, and their wives secretly consult a divorce lawyer.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 02:38 AM
9

Forest;trees
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 03:57 AM
5

I'm not talking about who men fear, I'm talking about the legal ramifications of women getting lighter sentences, and the very real phenomenon of women thinking they can hit men when they get upset, and it being socially acceptable.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 02:10 AM
8

All your questions, are a real time example of WAW. You even trivialized female on male domestic violence, after I specifically called it out. The real winner is your response to discipline gap, by painting boys as born bad. When the truth is, girls get lighter discipline when they commit the same offense as boys https://www.seattletimes.com/education-lab/same-behavior-problems-hinder-boys-more-than-girls/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:58 AM
11

Easy, the old adage: "Women are the fairer sex". Female on male domestic violence is trivialized. There's the female anthem "Before He Cheats". Which encourages women to commit a felony. There's also rape laws that define it strictly as a male act, because women wouldn't possibly do such a thing. The most insidious WAW effect starts at very young ages. The discipline gap https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/04/school-discipline-disparities-exist-in-race-gender-and-ability.html
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/24 01:39 AM

Lol, that's your evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/24 02:07 AM
0

You, aren't representative of the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 07:03 AM
0

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:48 AM
0

Ha, I know escorts, and men that use them. I still have connections to the lifestyle that escorts live in. I'm also the demographic that escorts target.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 06:43 AM
7

Ok, but most people that can afford escorts, don't use them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:13 AM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 05:04 AM
2

Nope, if I asked an average person about redpill, they'd assume I was talking about conspiracy theories, not dating strategies.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:44 AM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/24 12:12 AM
14

Far less men with the financial means to do so, use escorts, or sugar babies than you think.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:57 PM
1

Your definition of masculinity is so narrowly tailored that it's lacking, so is your definition of power.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 09:39 PM
1

Most, still implies that there's a segment that doesn't. That's the demographic that keeps these men in relationships. It's a more reliable demographic than any other.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:33 PM
1

Catherine of Aragon was the Queen of Spain, when Spain had the largest military, and largest empire. As a counter to your argument, she had the power to crush nations at her whim. If masculinity was just power, and strength ( She did actually lead some military campaigns) then she'd fit your definition of masculine. Which topples your thesis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 08:31 PM
1

Pro tip: the bad boy phase never goes away, they're still attracted to it, and will likely cheat on their spouse with a "bad boy" Jail fucks up your dating life while you're in jail. Once they get out it's fine. I know lots of felons, and lots of people that have served long prison sentences for very serious crimes ( kidnapping, Armed robbery, trafficking, murder). They never seem to have a problem Once they're out. I had a friend do a 23 yr stretch, he was banging one of the female CO'S while h…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:59 PM
2

Your premise that masculinity is power, or strength. It's not that at all. Catherine of Aragon was powerful, she reigned over a hegemonic empire that spanned the globe. She wasn't considered less feminine. John Adams was a bookish intellectual, of small stature, he wasn't deemed not masculine because of his weak frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:49 PM
2

For women that like that kinda guy, rarely ever does it get old for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:42 PM
0

Yes, and it's not just me. I see it happening in bars and venues all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:38 PM
2

You're seriously underestimating the market value of the "bad boy", of course the women they get are equally problematic, but it's still a market with demand. You ever notice felons don't seem to have a problem getting relationships. Even guys on the pedo list seem to have a constant supply of gf's.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:37 PM
1

Nope
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:32 PM
-1

Yeah, quite frequently in fact. Most people aren't frightened introverts, or creepy pick up artists. People don't mind talking to strangers, if you're not a creep women will let you shoot your shot. By not being a creep I don't mean that you have to be handsome. Attractive men can be,and are often creeps.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:29 PM
3

Except......it's ready normalized, and working in places that real people go to interact with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:24 PM
3

I wouldn't trust her, not because she was promiscuous.I appreciate a woman with 20+ notches on her bedposts.I wouldn't trust her because she was only banging ugly dudes. That would lead to think it was 1 of 2 possible reasons this occurred. 1. She was a prostitute ( escorts and sugar babies are just street walkers in fancier heels) 2. She's a manipulator, she was intentionally dating down to exploit a power dynamic and take advantage of these men. Both of these scenarios would be an automatic "n…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 07:20 PM
1

Outliers exist, but the core remains the same. If someone takes the trash out for you every Friday. You appreciate it, but you begin to expect that act to continue. It becomes the routine, that doesn't mean you no longer appreciate it, you're just not gonna post on SM about how your trash is taken out every Friday. Whereas someone that doesn't have someone taking out the trash, is going to post " What happened to the good men/women that take out the trash on fridays?"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 05:35 PM
-2

It has an explanation, it's just not a valid one. It also doesn't hold up under any real scrutiny. Here's a reality check, most adult men under 30 are not perpetually single. I'm gonna head you off at the pass, before you start quoting,and linking loneliness stats. The study that every other loneliness study uses as there basis is flawed. As I've posted numerous times in the past. The PEW study is so deeply flawed that it's useless. You actually touched on one of the flaws. The data for 30 yr ol…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 05:27 PM
2

I have 2 July https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=feSFVFoSOkg&pp=ygUfanVseSBub2FoIGN5cnVzIGZ0IGxlb24gYnJpZGdlcw%3D%3D Studio https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8zo9VTJUVWc&pp=ygUSc3R1ZGlvIHNjaG9vbGJveSBx
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 03:38 PM
0

Cool story, but most men in their 30s are married, most men in their 30s aren't rich,jacked,handsome guys. They're average guys making around 55k/year, overweight, and not tall.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 03:29 PM
5

The Bible gives detailed information on how to effectively treat pathogens,that doesn't mean that early man knew, or understood germ theory. The same applies in this situation. Adding to that, what you'd get wouldn't align along a red/blue axis.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 03:18 PM
11

The real world is where life actually happens. The virtual world is where we fantasize about the realities of the real world. Pill theory is so niche, that it only has a small subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 02:49 PM
5

You're both wrong, child support exists simply because the government doesn't want to pay for children. If it was about doing what's best for children. They wouldn't reduce things like WIC, EBT, medicaid, and housing benefits based on how much Child support you get.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 02:32 PM
3

You think kids aren't still fucking like rabbits in high school.........you sweet summer child, as a parent of gen z children I can assure you that the kids are still fucking.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 02:22 PM
66

They aren't obsessed, pill theory is an online thing. In the real world if you asked someone if they were red pill, or blue pill. They'd think you were asking them about socioeconomic or politics. They aren't obsessed with dating theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 02:18 PM
2

Happy people brag less than unhappy people complain. If you have a competent partner, the things they do become standard procedure. So for you, that's just the way things are. You aren't going to brag because your expectation is that they will the things that they always have.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/24 06:31 AM
3

Yeah, ignoring the overwhelming data that people don't settle, and most married couples are happy, and the super majority of marriages will not end in divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 04:20 PM
1

Marriage rates men in their 30s are stable, birth rates are lower because of economic concerns. Divorce rates were in decline when age of first marriage was in the mid 20's back in the early 90's. Instead of regurgitating podcast bro talking points. Look at the actual data, it backs up what I'm saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 04:17 PM
3

Nope, most men don't settle, they marry for love.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:13 PM
1

Nope, marriage rates aren't on a downward trend, it's just delayed because of economic concerns, rightfully so. The age of first marriage for men is 30. Most people are still getting married, and divorce rates are lower now, than they were in 1980s. The narrative that you're pushing is a lie, most men are married. There is no indication that trend will change in the future. While I'm not going to deny your lived experience, keep in mind that it's a personal,singular experience that's unique for …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:58 PM
1

Depends on what you define as young, age of first marriage for men is 30. Also keep in mind the study they're talking about is deeply flawed, and has been called out because of its flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:47 PM
2

You should get out more, most couples are looks matched.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:14 AM
0

I do, I have decades of adult dating/relationship experience. I have no problem getting into relationships when I want them. Besides for that, the marriage stats are published. Most adult men are married. Most adult men aren't gorgeous, neither are most adult women. Like finds like.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 03:13 AM
-1

Even middle of the road men can get sexual attention from women just for shoeing up. We know this because the average adult male is married.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 02:00 AM
-1

This another "Touch grass" post. If y'all touched grass more often. You'd see that most of the "ugly " people are in relationships . Water finds its level.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:56 AM
-1

Yet they still manage to reproduce, so someone thought they were attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:53 AM
13

The statistical average, statistically median man in his 30s can't support a household on his salary alone. He's not tall, he's overweight, middling looks,doesn't have an exciting career with a fast track up the economic ladder,and of average intelligence. There's nothing statistically remarkable about these men, yet 68% of them married.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/24 01:48 AM
19

Strange, because the average adult male in the U.S. is married. Before you comment and say that it's because of the population that's 40+. It starts at 30, which is the U.S age of first marriage for most men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 11:21 PM
1

Yep, plural, I consider anything over a year is long term.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 09:10 PM
1

Except......I did secure long term relationships when I reverted back to my original method.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:28 PM
2

Nope, the long term success women did not respond enthusiastically to the slower, deliberate approach. Your thinking is the same logical fallacy that I fell into. Women that want to wait until a committed relationship before sex, still want to feel desired. They want the opportunity to turn down your advances. They've been socialized just like other women to believe that men are lead by their penis, and want to fuck everything possible. So when they don't get that energy, they interpret that as …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 05:31 PM
6

Absolutely this, I had crazy amounts of initial success when I would try to fuck women on the first date. It didn't lead to as much long term success as I wanted, so I switched up my strategy to be more deliberate, and go on multiple dates before initiating sex. The result, I started getting less 2nd dates .
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 05:17 AM
5

Those study results are questionable, other researchers haven't been able to replicate those results consistently. Some studies have even shown an increase in T levels. There's also a regional/cultural component. The U.S. and Europe show very different results, even though both are predominantly white western centric regions. This is another example of pop culture click bait that blurs the lines of objective science.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 04:57 AM
2

It's pretty simple, become the male equivalent of the kind of women you want to date. Water finds its level, most couples match each other in comparable metrics
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 01:51 AM
1

It's variable by culture, Eastern pop culture standards prefer a softer look, but still expect men to be physically strong. Western standards prefer square jaw look.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 11:39 PM
2

Doubt your T level is low, you just don't exercise. You're wasting your natural genetic advantage. That's OK, not everyone needs, or wants to train. I'm also currently wasting my genetic advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 11:34 PM

The male loneliness study has glaring holes,and leads to false conclusions. The study has a temporal flaw, they use a 3 month window. If you were "single" for the 3 months prior to the survey, that counts as lonely. Even though if you were in a relationship 4 months prior, that doesn't count. Readers mistake the studies wording to mean that respondents are perpetually lonely. We should also keep in mind that the normal interval from the end of a relationship until the start of another is 6-9 mon…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 09:50 PM
3

In hiring,leadership, favoritism in social interactions. The pervasiveness of patriarchy actually has women treating things are usually identified as masculine traits, favorable to less masculine traits. From my personal experience working in a Verizon store. Female customers would give me deference when looking for information over my female Co workers. Keep in mind, all of the managers were women, with at least 2 years more experience than me. The General manager had 15 years of experience. Sh…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 03:42 AM
1

Actually they do https://archive.triblive.com/news/fathers-getting-more-involved-in-kids-lives-cdc-survey-finds/ I'm not denying your lived experience, or that of your friends, and loved ones. This myth needs to die, because it's never been true, except for one specific demographic, and they've never been a majority by populous, but were a cultural majority ( wealthy NE WASP). This trope continues because unhappy people complain more than happy people brag. If the husband cooks,cleans, and parti…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 02:39 AM
2

As they shouldn't, but the lazy man/ non participating father trope needs to die. That's not most fathers, as most dads happily participate in child rearing, and household chores/management. As most men do this( it's the overwhelming majority) no woman, rich or poor should accept less.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 02:01 AM
3

Women also tend to favor men in the workplace over women.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 01:55 AM
1

They've labeled the satirical drizzle drizzle soft male era, as misogynistic. When the guy that started the whole thing, just said quoted the popular Sprinkle, Sprinkle trend on tiktok. Women jumped on him, and doubled down when called out, by using homophobic slurs.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 01:53 AM
1

Mental, and physical abuse, grooming,manipulation, and possessive tendencies.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 01:48 AM
3

If/when the market shifts to a place where most women out earn most men. Then that won't really matter anymore, and women will date men that make less. You can actually see this already happening with the highest earning women. They happily date men with less income.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/24 12:40 AM
2

Which is the exact point I was making, a person will take the test, and self diagnose as ND, but won't actually seek out a professional to get an accurate diagnosis. Claiming to be ND to mitigate personal responsibility is very trendy right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 09:02 PM

This is another bad take, men have always competed with other men outside of their hometown market. You're granddad had to compete with guys from different cities to get your grandma. Romantic pencils, and correspondence dating was a real thing. Men and women from different states would place personal ads in newspapers across the country. Women have been able to drive for quite some time now, so they've been dating outside of their home market for quite some time now. Here's something to conside…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:29 PM
3

And then you woke up from that dream.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:14 PM

Nope, most men have very low standards for who they'd fuck. Which is different from who they'd marry. However, even in marriage social climbing ( marrying up) has always been a strategy that women have been able to employ because of the patriarchal system, blaming feminism, and social media is just wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:11 PM

Nope, because only 1/3 of marriages end in divorce, and even the ones that do, doesn't eliminate that it wasn't a marriage for love.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 08:04 PM

The average 30 yr old guy is married, median salary at 30 is 48k. Your statement doesn't line up with the real world reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:50 PM

Before dating apps, before social media, women already had this ability to punch above their weight class. It's always been this way, because you're all too keen on sticking you're dick in anything that moves. You have no standards, date like you're a water deprived person that wandered into an oasis. Blaming it on feminism is social media is lazy, and ignores the entire breadth of human history, and culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:47 PM
6

Temporary fixes are a good sign of long term success. Treating the symptoms doesn't always cure the disease. Just a heads up, a red piller is going to come along, and call you a simp, and tell you that she's hypergamously using you for resources there's not enough information to go off of....but they might not be wrong
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:41 PM
0

A good relationship is very dependent on both people being able to work together. It doesn't matter how great one of them is, if the other isn't also capable. If you don't have your shit together enough, you'll never be in a good relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:36 PM
3

You underestimate the human drive for companionship, and sex. You also underestimate the amount of men, and women that are predatory, and will use this as an avenue to find someone that they can control because they have an advantage over them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 07:32 PM
3

That really doesn't change your statement of fact, which was that there are less women with autism. There's also the possibility that women which suspect they're autistic without a diagnosis may still use it. The RAADS-R test is available onlinehttps://embrace-autism.com/raads-r/ . Someone scoring above the threshold (70) might be inclined to use the app for better results. Seeking what they think could be individuals that have a similar way of thinking, or behaving. The amount of people that wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 06:53 PM
2

Another thing to note, ND is a sliding scale. I watched the show Love on the spectrum. As for my personal standard, none of those women were at a mental level to give consent. ND men have standards also, they may not want these borderline consent women. The other thing is predatory men that sign up for the app, that want these borderline consent women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 05:44 PM
4

There aren't less women, they're less likely to be diagnosed because of bias, and males are more likely to be diagnosed because of bias. It follows the same curve as the discipline gap.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 05:29 PM

Honestly, the divorce rate for passport bros doesn't matter. Women in foreign countries aren't marrying y'all in appreciable numbers. Your success is higher in your home country than anywhere else. The English speaking women in these countries have a term for passport bros, LBH which means loser back home. They already know what kind of product they're getting when a guy has to travel abroad to get to wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 04:30 AM

https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-north-america-government-and-politics-divorce-rates-social-affairs-5d67bfb8b1c09233a8be2aa69912b327 https://www.petrellilaw.com/50-divorce-rate/ This is the closest that you're going to get to the real numbers.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:58 AM

For starters, the divorce rate isn't 50%, that got debunked years ago. It's actually much lower than 48%, but if you and others want to pretend that 41% is so much lower than 48%, God bless and good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:49 AM

I posted a link from an industry website. These are the numbers from the mail order bride industry itself, not an organization that has a bias against these kind of marriages. I'm using their own statements of fact. While the source says that it's dramatically lower, I don't think 41%, is dramatically lower than 48%. It's cringe to pretend that two numbers aren't close.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:45 AM

Did you read the article....100k is not the number for annual mail order brides in the U.S.. Even if it was 100k compared to 2 million marriages would be 5%. Which is still not a high enough number to affect the U.S. dating market. 41% isn't much better than 48%
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:34 AM

41%, isn't much lower than 48%.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 02:08 AM

https://mail-order-bride.com/guide/mail-order-bride-statistics
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:12 AM

Most, aren't having success
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 01:00 AM

Men are leaving the country in any sizeable number that affects the dating pool. Of all marriages in the U.S., only about 10k involve foreign nationals annually. Out of the nearly 2 million marriages per year. Here's the real tea: the divorce rate for passport bros mirrors the divorce rate for the rest of the population. If you're not a good catch here, you're not going to be a good catch there.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/24 12:02 AM
5

This is the wrong place to ask this question, These guys are barely functional. Their opinions do not reflect that of the majority of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/24 06:55 AM
2

I understand that, there are some wealthy people definitely have a "I'm better than you" vibe. Most wealthy don't, they are just regular people that don't view themselves as wealthy, even though they are. One example I know of is a family that owns a civil engineering/infrastructure company. Their assets include 2 golf courses, infrastructure firm, 3 mines, and a small port. They do have a very nice house, but they drive regular SUV's, their kids go to public schools, and they're very social peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 09:25 PM
3

Well, the average guy is making an average income. The average adult male is married.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:29 PM
1

Genuine question, why don't you get along with well to do people.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/24 07:25 PM
2

Arrogance and confidence are not compatible, having one of them eliminates the possibility of having the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:40 AM
3

Most women can't discern the difference betwixt the twain.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 06:38 AM
1

Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 07:05 AM
1

It's more than just being pale, there's music,movies, and whole Goth scene, just like any other subculture. Goth people are what emo people pretend to be. Goth understands the difference between down the river, and across the street. If anyone is struggling with mental health: https://www.nami.org/Advocacy/Policy-Priorities/Responding-to-Crises/National-Hotline-for-Mental-Health-Crises-and-Suicide-Prevention
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 01:40 AM
0

Let's say that you want to date a Goth muscle mommy, there are some things you should do. The first one is obvious, you should be a workout enthusiast yourself. Let's say that your current body type is amorphous tub of good. There's a great app called couch to 5k to improve your conditioning. If running distance isn't your jam, try HIIT programs. That's what the DOD prefers to get couch potatoes to persistence hunting predators. If you want a muscle mommy, you have to put yourself in proximity t…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/24 01:09 AM
9

Life Hack: You shouldn't try to be in the top 20% choice for women. You should try to be in the top 20% of the very specific group of women that you want to date. This requires you to know who you truly are, and what you really want, this will put you in front of your target audience, while also giving you a confidence/charisma buff. Guess what happens then? That increases the size of your hit box to include more women beyond just your initial target audience. The one thing universally attractiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 10:05 PM
0

Hot take: Your SMV is higher in your late 30s, early 40 Reasoning: Supply and demand, there's a supply shortage of desirable single people in that bracket. Which increases your overall demand. So your peak value, is to be single into your 40's at which time you'll have access to people that have already gotten themselves established. Men and women that would be considered low value, are getting a boost in the market. From my personal experience: I'm 44, my ex wife is 42. I regularly get hit on b…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 08:16 PM
1

This whole thread can be summed up in one phrase " manic pixie dreamgirl"
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/24 05:02 AM
-1

The was the Patriarchy Just because they didn't write out in detail that Sydney Sweeney shall rise to fame because of her physical beauty. Is not proof that a patriarchy is nonexistent, it demonstrates the opposite. As using female beauty as currency, or as a tool to rise above is feature of the system. The pornhub comment is just weird, they don't all look the same, that's just your algorithm bro. You have a very specific type that you like to beat it to. What you're referring to is benevolent …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 03:57 PM
13

Those products are often of lesser quality as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/24 03:07 PM
2

The christo-fascism that wants to destroy public education, and replace it with religious based education . The 20 year plan put in place to overturn Roe. The election which put Trump in office, they also control 4 SCOTUS justices. This was a meticulous plan put in place for the sole purpose of accomplishing those 2 goals. He was a cog in there machine. A useful idiot they could exploit, they don't need him anymore. They no longer support him, and that's why he's vulnerable right now, and won't …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 05:33 PM

Attributing this to capitalism is a bad take, and your premise that there's no sense of community is also wrong. For proof of this an easy example is the "Detroit vs Everybody" mantra. A city was dying, and a concentrated effort of philanthropists, politicians, business moguls, and most importantly citizens, all working together to restore what was once one of the world's greatest cities. It's not just unique to Detroit, all of my children have played travel sports, I also do a lot of traveling …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 05:26 PM
4

No, it refers to how people you've killed, tortured, or helped bury behind an abandoned schoolyard in Springfield, under a harvest moon in the cold dead of night. A flayed man has no secrets to hide
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 04:41 PM
3

Everyone else understands seems to understand why it was a bad study. Even the researchers that put it out, saw that they did bad work, and retracted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 05:01 PM
2

By trying to confirm their own biases, wait until you take a close look at the male loneliness studies.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/24 11:02 AM
3

If I go to the store Mon-Wed, and each day buy 6 oranges, that gives me 18 oranges. If on Thursday I buy 6 more, but eat 3, of them that would leave me with half of what I purchased for that day. Then if someone asked me how many oranges do I have, and I told them only 3. That wouldn't be correct, because I actually have 21 oranges. That's what the study did, they weren't tracking the total number married couples in the U.S. that got married, and then divorced. They were tracking the amount of n…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:28 PM
3

They weren't actually tracking how many married couples end up divorced. They were tracking how many divorces happened in a year. Those are very different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/24 04:00 PM
4

You can manipulate stats to mean whatever you want them to men. There's a great old saying. " There's lie, There's Goddamn lies,.....and then there's statistics"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:33 PM
1

That part as well, Russia is having a steep population decline, they're gonna lose half their population by around 2050.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:24 PM
4

The divided the number of new marriages in a year, by the number of total divorces in a year. So if 20 million total couples in the U.S. are married in 2023, and 1 million couples get married in 2024, but also in 2024 500k couples from the 21 million total couples get divorced. They divided the 1 million new couples, by the 500k total divorces. Which would give you the erroneous number of 50% divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 11:21 PM
6

The 50% divorce Stat is erroneous, and it's been known for a long time. The authors of that study retracted their research because it was so bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 09:53 PM
1

I'm backing up my points the same way that you are. You're using your intimate knowledge of how the system works, and I'm agreeing with you that it mostly works that way. I'm directly saying that it's just more common than you think, that people don't like apples, then explaining why they don't like them (hate blocking, trap blocking) I'm refraining from giving personal examples, or scenarios. Some guys on this board will take that as gospel, and not understand that it's situational, or that I h…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:19 PM
2

Once again you're operating under a fallacy that assumes these avenues didn't exist before now. Passport bros have existed for 3 centuries, which naturally implies that women have been able to market themselves outside of their home zipcode for that same amount of time. Magazines existed, people would post personal ads in newspapers. Cars have been around for a while now. You must not live in the Midwest, because if you did, then you'd know that cities are about 10-15 minutes apart. Even less if…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 05:08 PM
8

OP has drawn the right conclusion, even though his math is wrong. Women don't want to date men that are mentally weak, it's a turn off, and grounds for ending a relationship. It isn't because they're parasitic, or looking for a dark triad provider male. Humans don't find mentally weak people attractive. That goes for any well adjusted adult of any sexual persuasion.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 04:08 PM
4

Why do you assume that he was the aggressor, or was looking for fights? I see this sentiment a lot, and every time I do. Kinda feels like elitism, some of you have lived comfortable lives, some of us have not, and it wasn't by choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 04:01 PM
1

I understood your point, and agreed with the spirit of it. I'm just saying that undesired blocking, or blocking with an ulterior motive is much more common than you're alluding to. Unlike many guys on here, I have a vibrant social life. I don't have anxiety about talking to women, or hold antiquated ideas about what women should be. I also have friends that are women. As most of my friend group are women, I get to see both sides of this dynamic. In the same way that you can get a peek into the m…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 03:55 PM
5

It's not black and white, the women responding to you are oversimplifying it, but they are mostly correct. Most of the time, the women did in fact want someone to interfere. They are wrong about how often the interference is unwanted, and how often jealousy plays a role in the situation. Like most things on purplepill, this is largely nuanced, but people on here only think in binary.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 03:12 PM
-8

This subject isn't black and white, because you're correct that most of the time the friend is running desired interference. However, the sabotaging to get with the guy, or not wanting your friend to get attention because they want it instead. Is a lot more common than you think. The "blocker" does circle back to get the guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 03:02 PM
14

Most women over 36 are still attractive to every adult male age group. At mid 40s men in their 20's become less attracted to them, except for the ones that take exceptional care of themselves. The thing is, men 40+ are still attracted to the ones that the 20 yr Olds are not. The wall doesn't exist because women are still in demand with the men in their respective age groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 01:40 PM
1

The age of first marriage in the U.S. is younger for women, than it is men. So no, we aren't maturing faster than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 01:40 AM
5

Raised by a boomer, I'm part of the xennial generation ( gap generation of late gen X/early millenial) you're very wrong. The standards haven't changed that much. The women that are getting attention from today, would've gotten the same attention if they were in the 60's. The same applies for men, the circle goes unbroken. Boomers had influencers, they called them idols, and socialites. They were plastered over magazines, and TV shows. Reality TV was invented in the 70s ( the show cinema verite)…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 01:17 AM

That is very much dependent upon metric, and how you define cheating. Many women don't count it as cheating once they've emotionally checked out of the relationship, even though they're still officially with their partner. Or if they didn't orgasm it doesn't count, or if they were drinking, or if was only oral then it doesn't count. I believe that it's the way that society castigates women that cheat moreso than men. It's a the weird expectation on the other side of benevolent feminism. Wherein …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/24 01:03 AM
2

OP forgot to mention that military conflicts are also a byproduct of population decline. When you dig beneath all the layers. That's one of the principal reasons Vladdy daddy invaded Ukraine.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 06:43 PM
12

Yes, we certainly do. When men think of MGTOW, the thought is : Angry incel that wasn't going to get any women anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/24 05:57 AM
3

Too many NPC's on this sub, social media isn't indicative of real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:38 AM
1

Water doesn't seek out cracks, it just settles into them. Just like a side piece does. No matter what you say, it's not the outside persons fault, you're just not emotionally developed enough to understand how relationship dynamics work, and the only responsibility people have is to their own best interests.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 06:07 AM
1

Yeah they're the cheater, not the side piece. Only one person has the duty of loyalty in that scenario, and it's always the cheater, no one else
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 03:43 AM
-2

Forest;trees Nice try on, but poor analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/24 03:41 AM
1

Maybe people shouldn't be so weak, and need of outside validation that they seek the attention of someone else. Instead of working on themselves, and strengthening their relationships. People that like to focus the blame on the "home wrecker" are weak, and don't really understand relationship dynamics. That man/woman was going to cheat on you no matter what. It's their character flaw, it's their nature. You can't be home wrecker if there isn't already a Crack in the foundation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 11:51 PM
15

This is very much it, in my man whoring college days I preferred women with boyfriends. He does all the relationship maintenance, emotional support and labor. I get to reap all the rewards, because when she contacts me, she's only calling me for fun times and sex. That's also how they get caught up in the mess, and leave their SO for someone less worthy. The constant dopamine rush because the side guy is always about fun, and doing kinky things they're afraid to say to their partners. That dopam…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/24 09:42 PM
2

There are different levels of ASD, there are levels at which they have the capacity to affirm consent. This is just like any other interaction, including with NT people. I have met NT people that I felt didn't meet my standard of being able to affirm consent. I noticed that most of these people were home schooled, or some kind of a fundy based religious background. While being NT, they still lacked the socialization to affirm consent.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 11:12 PM
1

If your preference is lines of code, over interaction with humans. You're maladjusted, I hold this opinion if the individual is any gender. At no point in any of my comments have I claimed that women are perfect, are without flaws.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 09:03 PM
1

That those men are maladjusted, and lack the requisite human skillset to hold a simple conversation with someone that has free will.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 06:27 PM
4

Something you purchase has no free will, and you know it doesn't. You can't separate that part, you'll always know that it doesn't have the ability to choose. That might work for a very small percentage of men, but it's not what the vast majority of us want. It will never be a disruptive force in the dating market. We don't want the matrix, we want reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:53 PM
9

Appearance of free will, is not free will. Men want someone that chooses them. Lack of free will makes it impossible to be chosen. I see you also split my statement . Infertile women maintain free will,women aren't just incubation vats. You have a utilitarian view of women, and that's why you think AI will supplant them. That's not how it's gonna work, because Men enjoy the company of women. We enjoy the chase, we enjoy being desired,and chosen.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:32 PM
3

This is so out of touch, and completely detached from reality. There is no quiet male revolution. Men are not opting out en masse. AI sex robots will never replace women. The lack of free will, and inability to reproduce will forever leave them in a state of being a fancy fleshlight.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/24 02:03 PM
3

Not the quite the same for people that understand social cues, social interaction, and body language. The manipulation of NT women comes from the buy in of the "game" because of the social contract. Autists aren't aware of, or informed of the social contract.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 11:34 PM
13

Here's the perverse part of that equation. Women still very much want dominant men. Depending on where you fall on the spectrum. That's going to eliminate vast portions of men. Society doesn't have that expectation of women. Coupled with benevolent sexism, those same traits will be seen as quirky in women. This is also highly dependent on the man. I don't think most men would date an autistic woman. I remember watching Love on the Spectrum. It gave me a very visceral reaction, none of those peop…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 10:05 PM
28

Some guys will twist themselves into convoluted knots to justify their reasoning for wanting prostitutes. They don't want women, they want fleshlights with a pulse. In the words of Charlie Sheen " You don't pay a hooked for sex, you pay her to leave"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:42 PM
1

She was OK looking before the roids, and HGH. People don't realize how much it changes your face shape. Look at Zac Efron, that wasn't plastic surgery. It was the HGH he was using for the wrestling movie he was in.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 08:37 PM
7

Porn is grounds for divorce, at the very least you're going to the clergy to deal with your sinful "sickness"
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 07:15 AM
2

That's simple, they're angry haters that come here to shit on women as a form of revenge because they can't properly socialize with women in real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 07:01 AM
15

The traditional man schema is more fervent in Christian circles than anywhere else. That's what these secular guys get wrong when they say they'd do better with traditional women. They absolutely would fail with them, the gender roles are more strictly defined. If you can't emulate the role of strong provider, and dauntless leader. Traditional Christian women aren't for you. Being a single income breadwinner for a family of 6. Where you have to work, do all the outside chores,discipline the kids…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 06:55 AM
6

End thread
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 06:45 AM
0

Some people need time to grow into themselves. It's the ugly duckling phenomenon. So people look weird growing up around ducklings. Then they go through 2nd puberty in adulthood, and turn into Swan's. It also helps that when your frontal lobe develops, and you gain a sense of self. Develop a personal style, and make your own money, that glow up happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 06:43 AM

She is, but there's a meme about black women that marry well off white men, and bad hair. The worse the wig, the more comfortable the life.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 05:43 AM

She's easy on the eyes for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 05:30 AM

I don't think so, the closest would be S.E. Cupp, but she's not leftist, just traditional economic conservative. Which on the Overton window would put her left of center because of how drastic the shift is.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 04:47 AM

Yup
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 04:01 AM

People love a redemption arc, some right wing goon will say something about her. She'll wrap herself around feigned feminism, and re- embrace her blackness. Probably even speak at a historic black church. Write a book about everything she endured as she tried to change the GOP from the inside. Then take a job as a pundit on MSNBC. I'm gonna let you in on an open secret. Owens is a left wing Democrat that understood where the money is. An attractive well spoken young black women hoisting the GOP …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 03:59 AM

Hit this woman up, she needs the PR https://www.supertalk.fm/pregnant-laurel-woman-arrested-on-bestiality-charges-for-second-time-in-a-year/
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/24 03:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter