Note the shallow, parallel marks. Note the barely smudged eyeliner signifying no tears. Note the calm expression. Think about the manual dexterity it would take to slash someone 41 times with a scalpel and not once deep enough to cause a real injury.

Gemini4t · 2011-02-16T04:25:48+00:00

Welp, it was clearly Alan Tudyk.

knowless · 2011-02-16T04:52:31+00:00

so some kids attacked her with a disposable razor? I think the problem lies in that the sun is generally bullshit, and that they exaggerated the headline.

It is a bizarre occurrence, I could see it going either way without a credible source..

*it doesn't even say if she identified the weapon used without prompting.

walrus_ambush · 2011-02-16T04:16:19+00:00

Well I do see what you're saying but then again I don't see any sort of motive the girl would have to cut her own face. I would say she'd do it for attention but any SANE person wouldn't risk permanently damaging their face for attention.

P.S. Edit: How does this really have anything to do with men's rights? The fact it might be a girl lying makes it a relevant men's rights issue?

pcarvious · 2011-02-16T04:22:45+00:00

I'm in agreement with Walrus on this one. We don't know enough information to say if it was a false claim or a real one. There are people that are sadistic enough to do this, and people that are crazy enough to do it to themselves. Until we have more information we have nothing at all.

2011-02-16T04:26:59+00:00

This vaguely reminds me of the McCain volunteer who carved a backwards "B" into her own face and claimed a gentleman with an abundance of melanin had done so in honor of then-presidential hopeful Barack Hussein Obama.

And like amateur surgeons, these young hoodlums precisely made incisions that would not leave long-term scarring. I don't know a human on this planet that would stay that still whilst someone has a razor blade to their face. Not buying it.

DiabeetusMan · 2011-02-16T09:16:57+00:00

Also... guys... it is possible that the picture was taken.... after? significantly after? like long enough after to... put on new makeup?

2011-02-16T10:20:44+00:00

You are dead on. This is an excellent catch. I'll be looking for the followup retraction from the paper (LOl yea right, maybe buried at the very back next to the crossword puzzle in 6-point type.)

2011-02-16T04:46:58+00:00

It's an article from the UK tabloid The Sun, and therefore most likely bullshit.

ignatiusloyola · 2011-02-16T10:11:58+00:00

I really don't think it is appropriate for you to make such comments about this case until evidence suggests that these may be self inflicted.

Just like it would be inappropriate for the police to start naming names of attackers until they find evidence of such attackers.

mynameisflorian · 2011-02-16T09:24:41+00:00

What does this have to do with men's rights?

ohshazbot · 2011-02-16T04:28:19+00:00

The only relevant point you have are the parallel marks. I seriously doubt the other pictures were taken immediately after the attack. Honestly, it seems like your scraping the bottom of the barrel trying to find a non-existent problem

Comments