Debunking "himpathy"... all the data show both men and women have substantially more sympathy for women across the board

Mr-X1 · 2020-09-07T20:05:19+00:00

Lol at "himpathy." That people can even come up with something that is so obviously the opposite of the truth.

GalileosTele · 2020-09-07T18:22:53+00:00

Egalitarianwhistle · 2020-09-07T17:51:55+00:00

Bo Wineguard is my new favorite "MRA." He wouldn't call himself that probably but he does a good job of looking at the data outside of the feminist lens.

I don't think he would be writing these articles if it were not for already being fired as a professor because he is a known truth seeker.

WhenIsItOkayToHate · 2020-09-08T00:19:47+00:00

Okay, obviously, are people familiar with the concept of "history"?

leftwingrightwingall · 2020-09-07T21:30:47+00:00

Another example of the sky being blue. No one will care. Do you think women want their true nature being revealed to the rest of society? Why do you think there is so much push back against dating sites releasing data or any scientific studies that confirm black/redpill ideas? Anything confirming women's advantage in life will be shut out. A normal woman would commit suicide if she lived the life of a normal man for a month.

Kilkifish · 2020-09-08T02:44:54+00:00

They call it Patriarchy theory when spinning privileges and preferential treatment as demonisation and oppression. Women first, women not having to go to war, is saying women are weak. Women having to raise their own children instead of being forced into alienated labour is called oppression by men for men. Most women are oppressed, as are most men, but to suggest, say, Hillary Clinton, suffers the same oppression because she's female, as a female third world wage slave is absurd. There is sexism, gender has been used to rationalise inequality and exploitation as race has been. In many times and places woman have been treated like children, or worse property, denied the right to own personal property for example, and forced to rely on men. Required to provide sexual access to the men economics all but forced them to marry. But this is always the order the dominant class sees as best for them, best for all men might be a promise or a selling point for a broader class agenda, but it's never the ruling classes' actual aim to liberate all men. In most societies a high status woman is still better off than most men and women. Patriarchy theory would be more useful if it dropped the insistence that all men are oppressing all women. Unfortunately the choice of name doesn't help. Power oppresses, not powerless opinion. A pleb can abuse the women in his life, but he cannot redistribute power and wealth to put all men and women on roughly equal footing. And the powers that use sexism against women are the same who use unhealthy gender prescriptions against men. Men aren't supposed to complain about hardship, they're supposed to be tough and stoic and measure themselves by economic success. Good for the upper classes, not good for men.

Title	Debunking "himpathy"... all the data show both men and women have substantially more sympathy for women across the board
Author	Egalitarianwhistle
Upvotes	96
Comments	9
Date	September 7, 2020 5:42 PM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/ioc40d/debunking_himpathy_all_the_data_show_both_men_and/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/debunking-himpathy-all-the-data-show-both-men-and.1062851 https://theredarchive.com/post/1062851

Comments