TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

do you think men are more discriminated than women?

GaturCat

July 25, 2022
7 upvotes
/r/MensRights

View Poll

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title do you think men are more discriminated than women?
Author

GaturCat

Upvotes 7
Comments 53
Date July 25, 2022 3:47 AM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/w7ej3d/do_you_think_men_are_more_discriminated_than_women/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/do-you-think-men-are-more-discriminated-than-women.1124933
https://theredarchive.com/post/1124933

Comments

[–]ipwr85 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Men have always been considered the disposable sex but that isn't considered discrimination.It's just called human nature.

[–][deleted] 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]denisc9918 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Typical feminist twit response.

[+]GaturCat -15 points-14 points-13 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I am sorry, but its the first time i have heard that people see man as the disposable sex. Also, can we just stop fucking hating on feminism? Can feminist stop hating mens rights and vice versa? Maybe if we just joined forces we could stop sexism and gender inequality overall, instead of being close fucking minded and fighting each other

[–]TFME1 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

It may be the first time you heard it...But it's definitely not the first time men have been saying it. You probably couldn't hear it over the incessant din of the non-stop infinite "complaint marathons" and the "Victim Olympics" of the feminist "movement". Maybe you should broaden your horizons and listen better.

By the way, your response indicates that you believe sexism and gender inequality exists. Sexism of both varieties (male and female) DO exist and have existed since time began. Funny that female sexism mysteriously disappeared in the last couple decades. I'm curious how you think men and women are treated "unequally". The Gender Wage Gap is a myth, debunked multiple times, most notably by a female Ivy League PhD Economist, last name Golden. But, hey, science is only "real" science when it benefits the Intersectionality group that's currently being oppressed... the current "Gold Medalists" in the "Victim Olympics" (unless that group is men, we're always dead last).

[–]denisc9918 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but its the first time i have heard that people see man as the disposable

Bullshit. The evidence is everywhere.

can we just stop fucking hating on feminism

No. Feminism is despicable. The SINGLE worst thing to happen to women ever. Yes Women 1st then Society itself.

[–]Starmind0 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You're clearly a child who doesn't know everything men's rights movement and feminism has done, hence why you're comparing them. And if you want to pretend like you give the slightest fuck about men, then why call someone an incel for talking about something men are facing and have faced for centuries? Better yet, why don't you go to feminist subs and tell them to "just join forces with men's rights movement"? Go ahead, I'll wait for your answers.

[–]TextDependent6779 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

patriarchy is the problem with feminism.

the MRM don't have an equivalent.

they are incomparable.

also, how does male disposability = incel?

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Here's an example. 3 year old boy working as a chimney sweep, sacrificing his health, and maybe even his life to help provide for his family.

https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/u5q3a8/footage_of_a_3_year_old_chimney_sweep_from_the/

[–]denisc9918 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes yes, but women didn't get to vote!

I don't really have to add /s do I? lol

[–]intactUS_throwaway 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Men, hands down.

Even in places where the number of arenas isn't so skewed against men, there's nothing resembling a structure in place for addressing the problems in any way that can reasonably be expected to get results, and in some cases the structures that should be working on problems instead actively create more of them.

[+]GaturCat -16 points-15 points-14 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Only 100 years ago women werent allowed to vote, discrimination against women has always been extreamly common, discrimination against men has only started to mostly show in this last decades.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

discrimination against men has only started to mostly show in this last decades.

That's not because it didn't happen, but because nobody cared.

[–]denisc9918 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then why not cite examples from just the 'last decades'. Disingenuous at best.

[–]SvartHok 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Though the first statement might be true, it’s not like men have always had that right neither, since about 200 years the form of democracy that we know today was born.

[–]Stranger0nTheWeb 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The reason for them not being allowed to vote wasn't their gender though

[–]TextDependent6779 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

r u even interested in learning about make suffering, or do you just want to preach about how hard women have it? if it's the latter, please go preach in a feminist sub.

Only 100 years ago women werent allowed to vote

only started to show in this last decades

only 0 years ago men stopped being drafted. literally happening in Ukraine. being drafted has been a uniquely male issue literally throughout all of history.

[–]Klutzy_Pride_5644 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What country are you in? In England men got the vote at the same time as women.... that is the bit they left out of you history course. For a 50-odd years before that only nobility got to "vote". In Australia there was actually a few decades between men and women getting the vote and then more than half a century before the Indigenous peoples were afforded a vote

[–]denisc9918 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That heading is too broad to provide any useful data. Typical feminist bullshit.

[–]MarsRisen 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think we’re equally discriminated, but in different ways. Can’t compare tit for tat on everything. Also the issues we face, are met with far less societal concern. So it’s not that we are discriminated more, we’re instead ignored more often. Just my opinion though.

[–]Minute-Language-7993 5 points6 points7 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If you consider globally, then it's equal.

But if you're talking about the West? It's easily men.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You mean everywhere you know about it's men, but you still believe the stories coming in from other times and places?

[–]EvilRabbit64 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

I really don't think this sort of question is helpful at all.

Both men and women are discriminated against in their own ways, and they're each worthy of attention. We need allies that will help advocate for men's rights; belittling women's issues and stoking this idea of 'us vs them' is only going to be counterproductive. We should promote men's issues without tearing the other side down. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Of course, we're also going to get a very biased sample here, so why even ask?

[–]Starmind0 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Talking about men's issues isn't being biased. Some groups are factually more oppressed than others if you want this topic to be talked about.

[–]GaturCat 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I agree fully with whatt you said. Why the fuck should men and women be fighting to prove that they are the less priviliged sex, when they could instead join forces to solve sexism that goes both ways

[–]TextDependent6779 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

well then, making this post was a terrible idea, because you directly asked who had it worse.

a lot of people don't want to prove they're less privileged, but if you ask someone, they're going to say they have it worse.

[–]Starmind0 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

You literally went on a rampage attacking everyone here who talked about discrimination against men, and you tried hard to prove women have it harder. Now you claim this?

[–]TextDependent6779 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

they didn't so much attack, but they definitely went out of their way to prove women were less privileged (using outdated examples ofc), despite saying they agree with the original commentor.

[–]Starmind0 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Calling people "incel" for saying men are discriminated against isn't attacking?

[–]TextDependent6779 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i did forget about the incel comment, kinda tune comments with incel out these days.

my mind was drawn much more to the "women couldn't vote, blah blah blah" comment.

[–]EvilRabbit64 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Spot on ;)

[+]Ferbuggity -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Women have got worse if you consider this globally, and that's just a fact. Not so much in the West, where discrimination can be be seen to be swinging toward men. A more specific topic header might've had me vote differently.

[–]mikesteane 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (21 children) | Copy Link

Women have got worse if you consider this globally, and that's just a fact.

Can you support this statement?

[–]GaturCat 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

I could. Muslim women for example, in so many cultures women are seen as objects and there only objective to raise kids. Take the one child policy in china, women are seen as inferior, hence female fetuses were aborted and young girls abonded because you were only allowed to have 1 children per family. And people prefered to have a male way more.

[–]mikesteane 10 points11 points12 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

Actually the reason female fetuses are aborted in China is that under Chinese law and long-standing culture, it is the obligation of the eldest male child to support the ageing parents. Under the one child policy, parents with a daughter not only have no one to support them, but they are legally and culturally obliged to support unmarried daughters indefinitely. A married girl in China has the right to be supported by her husband. As you can see, the selective abortion is not a result of women being seen as objects or any other such nonsense but a backfiring of female privilege.

[–]Stranger0nTheWeb -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

it is the obligation of the eldest male child to support the ageing parents. Under the one child policy, parents with a daughter not only have no one to support them, but they are legally and culturally obliged to support unmarried daughters indefinitely.

That's not female privelage; that's because until recently, women in China were literally considered the family's property and thus could not own property or support themselves. Also with the tradition of foot binding (mutilating a non-consenting young girls feet so that she is more attractive in the hopes of attracting a wealthy husband 🙄 leaving her effectively crippled for life), their alternative would be to abandon their mutilated unwed daughters to die in the streets.

Here's a more modern example of unwed women in china, though:

The so-called 'leftover women' in China contribute more to GDP than in the US

[–]Starmind0 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Who are you lying to? It's not "until recently" or about property, it's simply straight up female privilege. Girls are expected to be given things such as actual care, love, money, etc which results in seeing girls as not beneficial. Meanwhile if they get a boy, it's easy to beat him, not care about or love him, and overwork him. No one would complain. And that's aside from the whole family's burden on his shoulders.

[–]Stranger0nTheWeb -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Girls are expected to be given things such as actual care, love, money, etc which results in seeing girls as not beneficial

That's because they were considered the male families property, rather than their own person like their brothers. Sure they had food, shelter etc but they were effectively slaves to be given away to another family for the purpose of making babies.

If a woman in old world China found herself unwed as an adult, her money making potential is severely limited compared to a male in a similar position.

(Only recently) In 2019 a government directive was released banning employers in China from posting "men preferred" or "men only" job advertising, and banning companies from asking women seeking jobs about their childbearing and marriage plans or requiring applicants to take pregnancy tests

And also Chinese women have historically held little rights to private property, both by societal customs and by law.

Women in rural China of course were "allowed" to work as labourers to support themselves, but if her parents subjected her to foot binding she would be fucked.

Those women had no choice but to live like that.

That is not female privelage, that is slavery and oppression.

[–]Starmind0 1 point2 points3 points 3 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Getting treated with the best treatment to the level of girls getting princess syndrome is "considered property"? No honey, it only seems like property because girls don't work and aren't burdened with much, which means someone has to provide, but parents are getting old so who do you think it is? The future husband. That's why both the parents and the daughter rely on getting the girl married fast.

And instead of linking everything to the same Wikipedia page, how about you specify? I want you to specify where your claims come from. Women in China have many privileges just like every woman, which is the reason why companies rather have men who barely have any rights, don't speak up much, and are made to shut up and overwork. What the hell do you expect the results to be? The issue in China wasn't about owning property, but working. It's literally a wide known stereotype of a Chinese man who knows nothing in life but work. (Chinese) woman? Just cook and live a carefree life unless the man is dying.

[–]Stranger0nTheWeb -2 points-1 points0 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

companies rather have men who barely have any rights, don't speak up much, and are made to shut up and overwork.

Do you have any sources for men "barely having any rights" compared to women? Any proof that the Asian culture of overworking is a male specific issue? Pretty sure their female colleagues work the same hours. Like this lady.

[–]Starmind0 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right, now compare that one woman to the countless number of men who died from overwork. It almost quadruples.

[–]Stranger0nTheWeb -3 points-2 points-1 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I don't know how to explain to you that going to school, being able to earn your own money, choosing your own career, voting, property ownership, freedom of movement, bodily autonomy etc are things that people generally WANT and for a group of people to not be allowed those things (women) is NOT A PRIVELAGE. Women in China fought hard for those rights; what you call "oppressive obligations on men". Do you understand what all the womens sufferage movements around the world were about?

As for my sources, there are plenty;

Don't like Wikipedia? OK here's another article about women being selected against in the modern Chinses workplace.

Here's an article about how China's one child policy had led to the advancement of women's rights, such as the right to higher education and the right to gainful employment.

Where are your sources? Or are you just arguing based on emotion

You must be extremely confused when you hear about how upset women in Afganistan are under the Taliban. "WhY ArE ThEy UpSET!? A mAn Is GoINg tO Go To WoRk for ThEm NoW! ThEy HaVe FoOd aND water!" /s

Edit: and it doesn't just SEEM like they were property. Women, back then, were legally property of their male relatives. Legally. Like a dog. I linked the source in that Wikipedia article you refuse to look at

[–]Starmind0 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women in China can go to school, work, own property, earn money, choose their own careers, vote, move freely, and have more bodily autonomy than men. Who are you trying to lie to? Are you seriously so desperate to paint women as the biggest of victims that you have to use outdated issues that even then don't hold up to what Chinese men face/d?

Moving on, the point of the first link is useless because I already explained why companies even do that, and why it has absolutely nothing to do with gender inherently, but more like gender preformence (albeit men preforming better after harsh discrimination and treatment). So is the other link's point which I already debunked as to why sons are preferred, a no brainer.

And what sources are you expecting? Are you one of those people who think sending blue words on the internet = you're right? Lmao. I only asked from you because when you first provided they were just Wikipedia, which mind you, are not used as evidence in actual studies and research. My "sources" are crystal clear in front of you: Who works the most in China? Do you expect the preferred boys in China to sit on thrones eating grapes? Who died the most in wars? Who are most farmers, even outside the law? Which gender of children do you think is put to work? It's a historical fact how boys in China are trained to be absolute machines who work, provide, fight then die. All while you're complaining about issues that, compared with men's, seem trivial. Keep in mind I'm focusing on debunking your words rather than adding for my points. I still didn't even start talking about the issues men face in China such as banning feminine men from literally existing in real life and TV, as well as enforcing laws that force men to become masculine and stoic. Literal laws, not social stereotypes anymore.

[–]EricAllonde 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Classic, and entirely predictable, feminist deflection:

Fact-based person: "Women are very privileged today. They have <these> additional legal rights that men don't have, they have <these> government programs supporting them that don't apply to men and they have <these> systemic & societal benefits & special privileges not given to men."

Feminist: "No, that's not true. Look, women didn't have <this> legal right 100+ years ago. That totally proves that women aren't privileged today."

Fact-based person: "We're not talking about 100+ years ago, we're talking about the situation today. TODAY."

Feminist: "Women didn't have <this> legal right 100+ years ago, therefore your argument is invalid. I can mindlessly repeat this same statement all day."

Very boring and tiresome indeed.

[–]Ferbuggity 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What about Nepal?

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What about it?

[–]Starmind0 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Muslim here, you're wrong. Women do face stereotypes, but so do men. MUCH more for men. Men are expected to work all day, protect, provide, show absolutely not an ounce of femininty or emotion, beaten to become men, genital mutilation is a tradition, etc. And regarding your false reasons about girls in China, no, they're not aborted because they're "inferior", it's because realistically they take more than give. Look up princess syndrome in China. Meanwhile if they have a boy, they can beat him to make him behave better, disregard his emotions and needs, and can overwork him. Your view of almost every issue is like a child's.

[–]Klutzy_Pride_5644 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Muslim women for example"? Do you know anything about Islam or do you just trust CNN? As a religion Islam looks after women more than any other and women in the time of Mohammed had rights under Islam that didn't appear in the west until the late 1800's. For what it is worth I am an atheist who couldn't give two shits about Islam or Christianity but the comment was so stupid I had to say something.

[–]Klutzy_Pride_5644 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you have any supporting examples that relate to topics that you understand or have relevance to you?

[–]Ferbuggity 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Are you kidding me...who these days has their head up their ass that far?

But okay:

PDF

https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar_url?url=https://www.academia.edu/download/31034537/Violence_Against_Women____Global_Scope_and_Magnitude.pdf&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3UDeYuyuFYK3ygTI66zIBg&scisig=AAGBfm3Sa5lUmavfT64-f_n2pCO-v77dcw&oi=scholarr

Global database

https://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/en

Wiki articles on 48 countries:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Violence_against_women_by_country

While I highly doubt you'll read all that, hopefully you'll be somewhat informed by the end,

Men's rights ARE NOT HELPED by denying that globally women are harmed in greater numbers. What's going on is horrific on an unimaginable and often immeasurable scale, and denying it is as dumb as dumb gets.

Commence the downvotes, I support men's rights, not idiocy.

[–]mikesteane 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

A more biased source than UNwomen would be hard to find. It is an overtly feminist political movement. I don't believe their statistics or anything else they say. There is more violence against men everywhere. There always has been and always will be.

Even if your sources were reliable, they would not prove the blanket statement you made: "Women have got worse if you consider this globally, and that's just a fact."

Your "that's just a fact" clause is a way of saying you will not consider any other possibility.

[–]GaturCat -5 points-4 points-3 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really do agree with this

[–]ketsa3 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just open your eyes.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter