Female empowerment inversely proportional to nihilism in men

Not sure where to have this discussion.

I think most of us can agree that men are territorial and have an urge to provide. In the time before time we were hunters, then farmers, then factory wage workers then high salary software engineers. One can say it's in our nature to generate resources. Another interesting point is living conditions for men, I reckon most men would be happy with a small apartment, a mattress on the floor and a tv/game console. Which is to say even if men generate these resources doesn't mean they spend it on themselves. This is trying to establish male nature.

For female nature, an observations is that they don't date down. This is only piece of female nature I need to reference for my theory.

As women become more empowered and start generating their own resources, their nature still leads them to get into relationships with men who have or can generate more resources than the woman. As women enter the workforce they drive down wages/salaries as the pool of workers increased. This effect would be greater in male preferred industries like STEM and finances. To add to these trends there are more women going to college for advanced degrees around 2:1 ratio female to male.

The effect is more women have more resources and want a man with even more resources. The wage/salary pressure from women entering the workforce lowered growth and now less men are economically viable.

Now women not only disqualify men based on the level of resources, but because they have their own resources then began disqualifying men based on genetics. Most women find most men as unattractive per the dating apps. Young men are growing up with the sting of rejection and their own biological urges denied because of an unnatural system of safety nets and female nature. I reckon that when some men realize that they will be in the unfortunate growing majority of men that never reproduce, build families or experience genuine desire can only lead them down a nihilistic path. What would be the point of living for a man destined to die without leaving a legacy?

Now imagine that you live in a country where you are expected to die for women that will never desire you? If men don't have a stake in society why would they want to preserve it rather than burn down a hopeless system?

PS this isn't a cry for help, I just can't unsee some of these links and the crumbling of society. I finally understood christianity and socially enforced monogamy. It's to keep men moored to society.