Throughout all of history only 40% of men have reproduced whereas 99% of women have reproduced. Think about how this affects women and humanity as a whole.

One day.To my eye, this accurately explains a lot of problems in society when you consider the theory of passing down one’s genetics.

Men since the beginning of time have been forged by the ruthless selecting game from women to become the best versions of themselves. Men must be strong, smart, dominating, fearless, transient, wise etc. in order to be considered worthy of having their genes passed down. It’s only ever really been the best of the best men who’ve passed down their genetics unto the following generation.

However, for women, there has been no bar, no quota to be met, nothing that had to be done in order for them to reproduce. They must merely exist. This doesn’t just reign true for the human species, this is evident across pretty much all organisms on earth.

And so, it makes me deeply question… how does this affect the current women of today? Given that character, intelligence, wisdom etc has not been a determining factor in which women would pass down their genes like it has been for men (selective breeding/eugenics), does this not indicate that the best of the best women from the past simply have not been able to have their genes dominate the female homo sapient market… as well as the worst of the worst women having been able to pass down their poor genes and keep them flourishing in the market today?

For me, this explains the neuroticism, lack upon foresight, inherent insecurity, living via ego, absolute reliance upon a man for emotional containment, narcissism, and monkey branching behaviors we see in the modern woman today. These are not “inherent” female behaviors, this not what women ought to be no matter what. These flawed traits do not define what a “woman” is.

Regardless of what the red pill ever said, something always bugged me about how women truly behaved in this world. I could never truly accept it. It never made sense to me so many of their ways and their propensity for neuroticism despite being fully grown adults… Yet we were supposed to abide to it and treat it as normal?

A lot of the accepted behaviors of the modern woman is, in all reality, pure dysfunction which is accepted by society because women are “purty” to look at and truly have no standards to meet as long as they aren’t 500 lbs.

And these dysfunctional and neurotic behaviors came from being passed down from each generation before them, never being bred out of the human genetic pool.

For contrast if a man was cowardly and low in testosterone, his genes were not getting passed down.

But a woman, regardless of her character traits, was passing down all of her genetics unto her daughters. No need for her to grow as an individual.

Once this happens en masse, we garner a society like the one we have today in which a woman’s character traits become far more noticeable.

This is why society as a whole and the dating market is the way it is today. The men of the past pretty much enabled this and did not have the necessary foresight for what their choices of women would mean for their sons of tomorrow.

This is groundbreaking for me and informs me more than ever that the mother of my children absolutely must be a genetic outlier in which she has the best character genes to pass down to future generations in order to fix this one day.