Very interesting...

DavidByron · 2013-06-10T07:04:41+00:00

It's a fair comment but I am afraid many here are too afraid of "looking bad" to get far from the status quo. Not a useful thing in a radical movement I suspect.

It's both a fair comment that women dressing to attract is sexual harassment against men AND it's bullshit, but that's because sexual harassment itself is a pure bullshit concept.

But if you want to take it seriously then equality demands that anything women do that a man might get upset or distracted by should be considered sexual harassment too.

theskepticalidealist · 2013-06-10T18:39:49+00:00

I'm not sure that a thread titled 'Very interesting...' can, objectively speaking, have a misleading title.

SplashyMetal · 2013-06-10T07:05:03+00:00

I just love that the title 'Very interesting' has been tagged as Misleading. I guess because it's not at all interesting? :D

Bear_naked_grylls · 2013-06-10T03:07:14+00:00

[Citation needed]

2013-06-10T04:03:08+00:00

How is this shit getting upvoted?

sillymod · 2013-06-10T02:48:26+00:00

What on Earth is she talking about? Dressing a certain way is sexual harassment? And where does she work that professionals wear tank tops and shorts?

NWOslave · 2013-06-10T18:42:23+00:00

Of course women dress specifically to sexually arouse men. The heels, the stockings, the short tight skirts, the nail polish, the tight low cut tops, the make up, the jewelry, the perfume. It's all done to show a woman's fertile, in heat and in need of sex. For some reason out here in leftyland, everyone in stuck thinking women are Victorian era pure of thought and deed. Instead of the reality that women refuse to control their base animal instincts.

Title	Very interesting...
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	13
Comments	12
Date	June 10, 2013 2:34 AM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1g0qcm/very_interesting/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/very-interesting.1171682 https://theredarchive.com/post/1171682

Comments