Any comments on this article? (or any that exists from other researchers)

63daddy · 2023-08-05T14:56:53+00:00

It’s based on the assumption that lower women’s representation must be based in discrimination and then theorizes where discrimination may be at play.

Just a feminists refuse to acknowledge non discriminatory reasons why women work less and earn less, this article refuses to address the legitimate non-discriminatory reasons why fewer women may rise to leadership positions.

For example:

It’s only recently that women have started outnumbering men in medicine, but it can take a couple decades to rise into a chair or other leadership position. Perhaps in 2 decades, there will be more women in such positions.
Women are much more likely to drop out of the workforce and this includes education, so fewer women will have the experience to become chair or other such leadership positions.
It could be women simply don’t seek such positions as much as men. These positions are often a lot of extra work for little extra pay. The article from what I saw completely omits how many women compared to men actually seek such positions.

When I worked in higher education, there was an effort to groom women for leadership positions but most quit working before reaching that level.

This article isn’t an open minded inquiry as to why fewer women rise to higher positions. It starts with the thesis it must be caused by discrimination and only entertains ideas fitting that thesis, ignoring all other explanations.

Current_Finding_4066 · 2023-08-05T14:39:13+00:00

Women are dominating medical sciences and the medical field in general, obviously the author claiming women are discriminated against in this field is a fool.

What I see is that more and more research that is not funded by feminist groups shows that men are discriminated against. People are actually afraid to slight a woman and be called a misogynist. Due to the drive to increase the number of women everywhere, women actually receive preferential treatment.

If some feel stupid cause they did not get their position based on merits, it is their problem.

ehWoc · 2023-08-05T14:36:01+00:00

There are many articles that conclude the same thing across many countries, is all I know.

Major-Donkey-6058 · 2023-08-05T14:51:09+00:00

It doesn’t fit the worldview I determined is true. I feel that men are the victims in the workplace and no peer reviewed journal is going to change my mind. It’s propaganda.

hospital_hypothesis · 2023-08-05T14:30:14+00:00

Propaganda

So-Contribution · 2023-08-05T18:37:48+00:00

Cultural stereotypes continue to characterize women as “communal” (eg, kind, dependent, nurturing) and deficient in “agentic” traits (eg, logical, independent, strong) that stereotypically characterize men

It's not just a cultural stereotype. It's based on biological differences between men and women. These differences then impact the culture, and culture reinforces them. You can see a large amount of overlap between all kinds of cultures and tribes all over the world. You can even observe many of the same roles in animals.

Of course, biology doesn't fit in the academic dogma of the day.

rabel111 · 2023-08-06T08:15:02+00:00

This is an opinion piece based on feminist ideological dialogues and principles. Real studies undertaken with rigor, have shown that women are given preference.

If you want to generate discussion, please don't drop feminist hate speech as a discussion point.

Title	Any comments on this article? (or any that exists from other researchers)
Author	mohyo324
Upvotes	10
Comments	26
Date	August 5, 2023 2:07 PM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/15iwn2w/any_comments_on_this_article_or_any_that_exists/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/any-comments-on-this-article-or-any-that-exists.1227563 https://theredarchive.com/post/1227563

Comments