~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
blueoak9
[removed]
[–]DavidByron23 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well yeah these abusive rules wont change because of any amount of persecution of men; that's their whole purpose. They will only change when women get attacked by the feminists' own rules, because at that point all the white knights will suddenly realise how corrupt and abusive they are.
[–][deleted]1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Maybe men should start taking on the home role on the regular, thus ending up the recipients of custody, child support, and alimony...
[–]DavidByron22 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
thus ending up the recipients of
That doesn't happen.
[–][deleted]0 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Pretty sure if the father is filling the role of primary caregiver it would.
[–]SarcastiCock3 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That requires two conditions. A woman willing to proudly support a man at home and not use the nuclear option of abuse allegations in family court.
[–]KarYotypeStereotype2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Yep. All she's gotta do is say "i'm afraid for my children."
But following the above line of reasoning, men need to start making abuse allegations and what not.
[–]TheNewComrade4 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As if you would win
You either don't seem to understand the concept of a hypothetical, or... you need a friend. :/
I'll be your friend.
[–]xNOM1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Went further and further down this thread, and then it clicked: egalitarians are just black-knighting feminism. LOL.
Remember that study where women found egalitarian men to be sexist unless they prefaced egalitarian actions with a statement of intent?
Is that the one about "beneficial" sexism?
Yes.
[–]blueoak91 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
How are you so sure? Do you know what the rate of CS default is for non-custodial mothers? It's huge. You are not a recipient until you are receiving. The gendered difference is the indifference of the courts and the political system to go after deadbeat mothers.
Let's remember that, at least according to the way the census categorizes things, men account for less than 3.5% of stay at home parents; so, if a father is getting custody, it's likely because the mother has some pretty serious issues. The higher rate of non-payment by women who owe child support may well be down to a higher rate of inability to pay...
I found the comments hilarious. It makes me want to watch "The Office" again.
[–]Broodaskani-2 points 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
While the reasons and conclusions in this piece are altogether total shite, if someone makes you feel unconfortable at work you absolutely should go to the HR, it's their job. I don't see how that is knighting of any color.
I thought the Men's Rights advocated for dismanteling harmful gender roles and frankly this kind of 'Alpha' babble is the total opposite of that. Also, the site is blatantly sexist.
I thought the Men's Rights advocated for dismanteling harmful gender roles
And you were right. this article is about dismantling the white knight role, a structural feature of the harmful male gender role. Odd that that escaped you.
"Also, the site is blatantly sexist."
You do not course corrections by steering to the middle but in the direction opposite to the deviation. The current toxically anti-male sexism of society is deviant.
[–]Broodaskani1 point 11 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ah, so the road to equality should be paved with sentiments (Top posts) such as "Women: Don't cut your damn hair because it doesn't sexually gratify me" and "Women don't even logic".
What a great idea.
You're not very good at strawmanning; I can't even guess what the connection might be between your strawman and anything the article says.
I said the site was sexist, you said it's necessary to overcorrect and I questioned this sarcastically by pointing the top posts on the site which aren't by a long shot heplful to anyone, regarding equality.
It didn't address the white knight vs black knight thingy, since it should be obvious that fighting harmful (doing something because of sex) with harmful (doing something to disdain) is a stupid notion. It just adds more assholes to the equation, even with the possibility that there really are so many men who are nice to women for hope of sex. Or is a White knight nowadays just someone who agrees with a woman?
Or is a White knight nowadays just someone who agrees with a woman?
No, one who protects her only because she is a woman and he thinks it makes him more of a man.
"It just adds more assholes to the equation"
Okay, agree. Usually that's not a good thing. But sometimes things have to come to a crisis before they resolve. That's the function of asshole loading the situation.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]DavidByron23 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DavidByron22 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SarcastiCock3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KarYotypeStereotype2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheNewComrade4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xNOM1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xNOM1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]xNOM1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Broodaskani-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Broodaskani1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Broodaskani1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link