~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
blueoak9
[removed]
[–]IS44109 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Oh, and someone even posted with a 'counter story' down in the comments:
Want a counter story?
Probably not, but I’m posting it anyhow.
One of my hometown neighbors was a high function autistic guy about 5 years older than myself. He could hold conversations, knew right from wrong, even held a job, an actual job not a ‘poor you’ bullshit job. You could tell he was not quite normal, but he got around pretty well on his own.
Just after he graduated, around the time of a town festival, he stuck his hand down a 12 year old girl’s pants and groped her. Police were called, legal action was threatened, but his mother came swooping into to save the day with ‘he doesn’t know right from wrong, he’s autistic’. She claimed that she would put him in counseling, and that was that.
6 months later, he does it again. Another 12 year old, his hand down the front of her pants.
I spoke with this young man on many occasions, he walked past the house often and he liked to talk to people. He knew how to behave appropriately, how to interact with people in an appropriate manner. The second time was met with harsher reaction, ‘he doesn’t know better’ wasn’t going to work, and his mother had a court order to actually put him in counseling, since she didn’t do it the first time.
I’m not telling this story to rail against autistic people.
What I’m trying to say is that I don’t think autism should be an automatic shield against punishment.
If someone clearly has issue understanding appropriate behavior, then punishing them isn’t going to work well. If they’re like my former neighbor, autism shouldn’t be a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card.
Hold up, everyone... let's go back to one minor detail in this story:
high function(ing) autistic guy
Let me explain some things about this word we use in the world of autism: it's called the spectrum. It's a scale, and it's a brilliant way of saying, "People are different."
Here's something I hate about the spectrum - or rather, people's reactions to the spectrum: I have to explain and re-explain and repeat myself to someone like this every damn time they come along and try to 'counter-story' with something that is not even remotely the same.
As someone diagnosed with high-functioning autism, I do indeed know the social boundaries of right and wrong, and I know it's wrong to stick my hand down someone underage kid's pants; that's just a given.
Here's what else I know: I am eons away from the bullied child mentioned in Liv's comment. Eons. He and I share a trait of mental function, but we are not the same, not even close.
Yes, I hate it when people try to use autism as an excuse for bad behavior. What I hate more, though, is this stupid assumption that autism automatically = one well-defined function of the mind. It just pisses me off for a whole boatload of reasons.
TL;DR - I am not the goddamn Rain Man. Neither was the man in the counter story... but that bullied boy probably was.
[–]liquid_j49 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
most people not in the know mentally skip past the high functioning part... they don't understand...
My 7 year old son is not high functioning, and he's the number 1 reason I support the MRM for exactly the reason in that post. My boy will have enough hurdles in life to deal with without being branded a potential predator for no other reason then his gender.
[–]breakneckridge15 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Hurdles
[–]liquid_j6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
lol... yeah, those :P
[–][deleted]3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
please edit it, not usually a grammar Nazi, but that one is like really bugging me.
[–]liquid_j11 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
normally I'd leave it to admit to my fuckup.. but for you good person I shall fix it
[–]jcea_4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The best method is to use strike though like so
You strikethrough by surrounding words with double tilde (~~) like ~~this~~
Use it on the old version and add the corrected version.
[–]RIP_BigNig-1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Are being a potential predator and having autism mutually exclusive?
[–]liquid_j9 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
with people incapable with forming the specific intent, yes it is.
[–]scemcee-8 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So, if the recent reports that "1 in 78 children now have autism" are true, we are heading toward a world where we alleviate an increasingly significant portion of the population from the burden of 'forming specific intent'? Great.
[–]FallenMatt7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
As the original comment said autism is a spectrum.
So that doesn't mean 1 in 78 cannot form specific intent. It means that a percentage of those 1 in 78 cannot form specific intent. Not everyone with autism is that impaired. They can tell wrong from right and they are just people.
[–]seandamiller5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Also, Autism is not necessarily increasing in frequency. The definition for autism has broadened (the spectrum used to be narrower and more specific) And the amount of people being "checked" for autism has increased. So even though we can now label more and more people around us as autistic, it is not because more people are becoming autistic (brain changing), but simply that society can now call a larger population of people autistic (definition/label changing).
Also, as stated before (several times) autism is a spectrum and thus different amounts of responsibility deserve to be given to different parts of the spectrum. So we are not heading towards an increasing population of people incapable of forming specific intent because people with autism that can form specific intent will and should be held responsible for there actions and the group of people who cannot form specific intent are not necessarily increasing frequency. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism_spectrum
[–]blueoak921 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"I’m not telling this story to rail against autistic people. What I’m trying to say is that I don’t think autism should be an automatic shield against punishment."
Tie her/him to that strawman and light it up. Who said anything about making autism some kind of automatic shield against punishment? The issue is changing it from automatically leading to punishment.
[–]occupythekitchen16 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The real issue is how easy it is to be in a sex offender registry not that autism is a shield from responsibility.
If you had a 4 year old grope a woman showing her cleavage would you want that child to go to jail? No you would teach the kid that is a bad action and the same principle goes to someone who is autistic. Just because you think they may know better because of their age doesn't mean squat, autism by definition means that person is going to be isolated and isolate themselves, their social maturation will be much slower than a normal person and an autistic person at 24 is very much a fish in an ocean full of sharks.
As the father wrote you can tell his action is going to be of an over bearing parent, he'll limit his kids social interactions, he'll protect his kid and eventually one day he won't be able to do so and his kid may do something he doesn't realize the gravity of.
Oh and in a different subject, if the same rule held up to women they'd all have a criminal record. I have seem women grope strange womens breast in public, I have seem them grope men in public, I have been groped by strange women, etc.
[–]Blindocide5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
girl grabbed my ass out of nowhere during mardi gras this year. she was like "sorry" (which is just a cover up, she probably didn't give a shit) and I was just like "well... it already happened, so."
as if the police, in New Orleans, are going to give a fuck about that, during mardi gras.
blech.
[–]starbuxed1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Well on the flip side if I go to an event like that and don't get groped at least once I feel like I have done something wrong. I have been to the west Hollywood Halloween party many years. Every time groped by strange men and women. Then again it might be a different scene.
[–]raesmond5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wouldn't the story imply that it doesn't automatically lead to punishment? This guy was high functioning autistic and groped a 12 year old girl, and got NO punishment. On top of that his mother lied about putting him in counseling. Then the second time he got court ordered counseling. At what point was the punishment too severe? And could we not blame feminism for these kinds of things. It wasn't the direct intention of anyone to treat people with autism harshly. Yes mistakes were made when implementing sexual abuse laws but blaming people for the current state of the law is just another way to avoid actually doing something about it.
[–]blueoak95 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"And could we not blame feminism for these kinds of things. "
Yes; since neither of us did just now, it is obviously possible. The problem is not feminism, the problem is gynocentrism - valuing girls and their comfort over neuroatypical boys.
"Wouldn't the story imply that it doesn't automatically lead to punishment?"
As you will notice when you read my comment, I was responding to the piece of text, those two sentences, that I copied and cited, not the whole story.
[–]raesmond0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm just saying that story would imply that the problem you're worried about isn't a problem.
Edit: The picture in the post blames feminists. That's what I'm referring to.
[–]blueoak91 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Ah. That makes sense. That "we".
[–]raesmond1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
What we?
[–][deleted]2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
blaming people for the current state of the law
Disagree. If you don't point out that their past mistakes caused these issues, and that the ideas they subscribe to are causing problems, they will have no reason to change.
they will have no reason to change
The law not working is a pretty good reason to change. The only thing that blaming feminism could achieve is to uproot the whole law, which would be bad. The intention of the law was never to mark good people for life, that was just poor implementation. So we need to reimplement, not run around trying to blame the whole concept.
[–]DukeMaximum9 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
My understanding of autism, as informed entirely by the show Hannibal, is that it's basically a super power. So, do you use your power for good or evil?
[–]Sharou7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It is and it isn't. Think of it as trying to run Windows 7 on a 486 while everyone else is using Windows 3.11. If you had ten times the brain power it would probably rock. But as it stands, you sacrifice a lot and things are generally a bit of a mess.
[–]Aatch8 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Wow, that's a really good analogy. Though I'd like to make a slight change.
Autism is like running on a general PC and everybody else is running on custom hardware. Overall my processing power isn't any better or worse than anyone else's, I just don't have the specialised hardware for some tasks so I have to do it in software instead.
[–]Popeychops1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
So does that make education like overclocking for the mind?
[–]occupythekitchen4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
My buddy was a special education teacher, autism has kids who are extremely smart but socially stigmatized to the ones who have no control over their impulses. It is truly a disorder that can affect people very differently.
The comments here are also pissing me off because a lot of people want to lump the person as being bad for being impulsive instead of letting the autistic person know they are good and good people don't act that way. This is why it's so hard to counter bad behavior people want to reinforce the negative image instead of reinforcing the good one while admonishing the action and not the person.
Honestly, I find some of the comments down below to be extremely stupid.
[–]knowless1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Okay, this isn't the time or place for this: but what is normal in regards to autism?
As far as i can tell autism is a catchall for idiosyncratic behavior.
If i "don't understand my place" does that automatically mean I'm "autistic", the whole thing reeks of anti-intellectualism to a degree akin to eugenics.
Ill go read the dsm entry again with the full knowledge that aspergers was both included and removed within my lifetime.
[–]occupythekitchen3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
autism is not an excuse it is a condition. This condition has varying degrees from someone who is socially anxious to someone who is downright retarded socially. The main issue is autistic people look normal, they don't look like someone who has down syndrome, they look regular but by their behavior you know they aren't normal.
This girl I dated a few years back baby sat an autistic kid, she'd complain of him playing with his feces to down right trying to grope her (and he was only 7) I asked my buddy who taught special ed how we could make his negative behavior go away and he said, reinforce good behavior and tell him that bad behavior is bad (if he continues doing bad behavior he won't get rewarded). Depending on how badly they are affected by the condition you can't really expect huge gains and they may always give back to impulse until they have been conditioned to behave otherwise.
The kid she worked with was very low functioning and autistic, he may one day realize his actions are wrong but it'll take a lot of neuro imprinting and he will most likely be old enough by that time that someone could see malice in his action instead of retardation.
[–]iethatis4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
autism shouldn’t be a ‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card.
Just like being a woman....
[–]Blurgas3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I once had a coworker that had Down's Syndrome, but if you spoke with him, you could tell he was as sharp as anyone else. Basically the appearance of your "standard" Down's afflicted person, but none(at least not obvious) of the mental issues. Little shit abused it to the fullest. He'd dick around, take his sweet time, do half-assed work, etc, etc, and when the boss came around, boss had nothing but praise for the guy. Everyone else knew he was full of shit, but nothing could be done.
[–]chavelah63 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
This person may not need feminism, but they sure as hell need a long-term custodial arrangement for their child if they are so disabled that they are going to grow up unable to regulate the impulse to grab strangers' breasts. People like that need and deserve a caregiver within arms' reach at all times when they're out in public. The fact that this is hard to come by is a social problem that needs to be addressed.
[–]blueoak913 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Here's an upvote.
But we need a society where people who are "a little weird" are not the easy targets of bullying and fear.
[–]MIXEDGREENS4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Sexually assaulting people goes a bit further than being a little weird.
[–]JerfFoo2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
It's a special kind of stupid-irony when a piece warns us about how feminism is the tool for "bullying and fear."
[–]LemonDropLollipop5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I agree wholeheartedly. It seems ppl can miss important middle ground on this subject. My brother is a low-functioning autistic, who has had problems with personal boundaries (e.g. being naked in public, poking chests, etc.) He is never unsupervised in public for this and other reasons. Yes my family and I realize he doesn't understand, but we also don't want some poor person to feel violated! Edit: if someone did end up getting hurt, I would feel it was not my brother's fault, so much as the person acting as his guardian at the time. As to sex offender registry, if the person has committed an offense, they are technically a sex offender you know...
[–]tactsweater4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I completely agree, which leads to one of my disagreements with the broader MRM**. If his son, and the many others with similar conditions, are to receive the care they need, it's most likely going to come from the government. Pure individualism, the invisible hand, and the rational agent may not hold the answers he needs, but that doesn't mean feminism does either.
** That is to say that many (not all) here seem and tend to hold socially conservative views and/or have a strong dislike for all things government.
[–]liquid_j10 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If his son, and the many others with similar conditions, are to receive the care they need, it's most likely going to come from the government.
Let me start off by saying I'm so liberal I'm Canadian. LOL There are a few of us liberal MRM supporters, but we're few and far between because most liberals blindly follow feminism.
When the extent of my sons autism became apparent, one of the first thoughts I had was that I'm going to have to live a long time if I want to make sure he's protected. I've seen first hand men with clear mental disabilities living on the streets, shunned by society. The stigma of male mental illnesses causes society to shun them, rather then reach out to help them. After my wife and I die, who's going to take care of him? I worry about that every day and it's often my last thought before falling asleep. Every risk I take at work (construction) I weigh in my head the chance of death because I know my son is going to need me for many years to come. Being a parent to an autistic kid, who may very well need me forever, opens your eyes to a couple realities that most people fail to apreciate.
[–]Sebatron25 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There are a few of us liberal MRM supporters, but we're few and far between because most liberals blindly follow feminism.
Try being a socialist who sympathises with the MRM.
[–]liquid_j2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Lol. That made me think of this. http://cliptank.com/funny-clips/dave-chappelle-black-k-k-k-member.html
[–]tactsweater3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Let me start off by saying I'm so liberal I'm Canadian.
Well, I don't know if I'd say I'm that liberal. ;)
Have you ever gone out with a woman with a nice rack? I have seem them get groped by other women and they usually get very flustered but won't press charges.
Truth is if autism was as manageable and controllable as you suggest it wouldn't be a life time condition. Sure the kids after exposure and socialization may eventually learn what is right or wrong but there will be points in time along that road they will do something that is considered bad.
You for example would have the person think they are bad for an action instead of teaching them they are good but the action is bad. That is why mental disorders are so poorly addressed.
My friend was a special needs teacher, autism has many different ranges, from the kids who are shy and extremely intelligent to the ones that play with their poop and masturbate in public. Don't lump them all together.....
[–][deleted]8 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
....
[–]oneiorosgrip6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
At my old job, we had a female customer we used to call the "boob lady," not because she had any, but because that's where she simply had to pat you to get your attention if you were female. My coworkers usually avoided her by hiding behind the checkout counter where she couldn't reach, but my job usually had me out on the floor, so I got tapped on the boobs (and mine are nothing to write home about) a lot. It didn't bother me, but it was obvious that it was intentional, and that irritated me, so I used to pick up boxes or other big stuff to carry when I'd see her come in, just to make her maneuver around an obstacle to get to them and watch her try to figure out how to reach boob without feeling like the action looked deliberate.
I'd have had the same reaction but I don't think it would have been as funny to my coworkers.
[–]NiceIce1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You didn't actually read the article, did you?
He DIDN'T grab anyone's breasts.
[–]Zosimasie2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You didn't actually read his comment, did you?
He DIDN'T say anyone did grab anyone's breasts.
[–]NiceIce-5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
that they are going to grow up unable to regulate the impulse to grab strangers' breasts.
[–]Zosimasie1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
to grow up unable to regulate the impulse
I don't see anywhere where someone grabbed a boob.
[–]NiceIce-4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not going to spell it out for you. Go back and reread the comment in its entirety.
[–]Zosimasie0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
The comment was talking about a hypothetical situation that could arise in the future. You're commenting as if he's talking about a situation that happened in the past. You're talking nonsense. And you're a dumbass.
[–]NiceIce-2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Reading comprehension just isn't your thing.
Dat Dunning-Kruger effect. It's sad when the ones the most wrong think they're the most right.
inb4 "No, you are!"
Certainly applies to you.
My favorite part was where I predicted your response, and that was still the only response you could muster. Fucking classic.
[–][deleted]29 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Teach him not to be autistic.
[–]Professor_Yaffle11 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Also, when it looks like he might be about to be autistic, it's the job of other men to step in.
[–]IS447 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"Have you tried... not being a mutant?"
[–]KngpinOfColonProduce5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Anti-autistic seminars and non-autistic safe spaces on every campus. /s
[–]SnowyGamer12 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
That sign doesn't make any sense. Is it a troll?
[–]killbasasausage12 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don't like this. Autistic persons for the most part do not impulsively touch people. Someone who is autistic might lash out at people and hit people if they get overwhelmed or too stimulated, but usually they don't even like touch at all. Someone with an autistic son should know that.
And if your child has a mental disability that leads them to touch strangers in public at all, not just a woman's boobs, they need to have someone with them at all times.
[–]Bartab1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I don't like this. Autistic persons for the most part do not impulsively touch people.
"It is important for parents to recognize that it is common for individuals with ASD to display sexual behaviors. "
Autistics have problems with recognizing social boundaries. Are you suggesting that they should all "have someone with them at all times"?
[–]killbasasausage1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I work with people with autism, I'm a male nurse, I think I'd know what they act like. And don't call them autistics. It's people with autism. And autism is a spectrum. Some people with autism might have boundary problems and then yes they should probably have a parent or close friend with them when in social situations.
[–]Bartab-2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
autisticsautisticsautisticsautisticsautisticsautisticsautistics
jesushchrist you politically correct deluded fool. The oldest community of autistics has a website at Autistics.org
Nobody calls them "people with autism".org
[–]kahow11071 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
One of my best friends is a diagnosed high functioning autistic guy. He's pretty normal, except he masturbates like 20 times a day. But I can't really blame him for that.
[–]ArnoldSnail11 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
If he's already assuming his son won't be able to control himself, and that lessons on appropriate touching won't help, the fact of the matter is that he should be treated as a danger to society. His motives may not be sexual but he would still be violating those around him.
[–]damnBcanilive10 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Who are all these people blaming women for rape? I'm pretty sure 90% of people are blaming the rapists.
[–]typhonblue8 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
When people question a woman's story that's "blaming the victim", even though what they're questioning is if she's a victim in the first place.
What feminists really need to prove their assertion is to find people who actually believe a woman was raped but still blame her anyway. No question in their minds, she was forced against her will and gave every indication possible that it was against her will, but, hey, it's still her fault.
[–]raesmond4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
gave every indication possible that it was against her will
Shit man, I would hope most guys would stop at the first indication.
[–]typhonblue6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
You don't need to hope, that's a weasel way of demonizing men.
BTW, I'm a woman.
[–][deleted]1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Holy Shit
It's a Typhonblue in it's natural habitat!
Sorry about this, but I didn't quite understand your comment. What's a weasel way of demonizing men?
[–]typhonblue4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Saying you hope that most guys would stop at the first indication.
Most guys would stop at the smallest indication of lack of consent or even lack of interest.
As why I said "every possible indication"; I'm trying to exclude female rapists who say "no" and then continue to pursue sexual activity.
[–]raesmond2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I knew plenty of guys in highschool who were pushy. It's actually pretty common.
Edit: Oh and my first comment was not "demonizing men" in any way. That is a major over reaction.
[–]typhonblue5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Did you notice the pushy girls?
Well no, don't get me wrong, I'm sure there were some, but our society tends to teach men that they should always want sex (which leads to all sorts of fucked up problems for men and women) while teaching women they should be picky and conservative. (Again, all sorts of problems for men and women)
43% of high school and college men and boys reported being victims of sexual assault or rape with 95% of them reporting a female aggressor.
Maybe you were looking for the pushy boys therefore you saw more of them?
I'm scouring your link for more information on the study. But so far it looks like they didn't include information on whether or not the victims refused sex at first and then were coerced through persistence. I'm not saying that that study isn't clearly horrifying, but I don't think it actually conflicts with the point I was making.
Edit:
The findings revealed a need for more scientific study of the thin line between sexual seduction and sexual coercion, the authors wrote. “While not typically addressed in sexual violence research, unwanted seduction was a particularly pervasive form of sexual coercion in this study, as well as peer pressure and a victim’s own sense of an obligation. Seduction was a particularly salient and potentially unique form of coercion for teenage boys and young men when compared to their female counterparts.” French said.
But so far it looks like they didn't include information on whether or not the victims refused sex at first and then were coerced through persistence.
They most definitely did.
18% of the boys and young men reported being physically forced into sexual contact and sex.
I find it amusing how you once again selectively edited what you saw, and went right to what confirmed your point of view.
Of 284 U.S. high school and college students who responded to a survey about unwanted sexual encounters, 18 percent reported sexual coercion by physical force; 31 percent said they were verbally coerced; 26 percent described unwanted seduction by sexual behaviors; and 7 percent said they were compelled after being given alcohol or drugs, according to the study.
[–]raesmond-1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
We're both quoting, that's not selective editing. Obviously physical force is rape, and the rest could be rape too. I'm saying none of it disagrees with what I'm saying.
And what I'm saying, is this is an awfully high number of "pushy" women that you failed to pick up on.
So were you seeing what confirmed your belief system?
Okay again, the study doesn't actually go into whether or not the coercion was rejected at first and persisted.
[–]typhonblue3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Physically forced is pretty clear cut. And if you just look at that, that's 18% of men and boys.
That's a lot of "pushy" women. Well. That's a lot of female rapists.
Yeah, I wouldn't call that a woman being pushy, I would just call that rape. Calling a rapist pushy is like calling an arsonist a nuisance.
[–]typhonblue2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
By all measures if it was verbally coerced there was resistance and the woman "pushed" through it.
The study doesn't say that. I think you might be assuming that. Again...
The findings revealed a need for more scientific study of the thin line between sexual seduction and sexual coercion, the authors wrote. “While not typically addressed in sexual violence research, unwanted seduction was a particularly pervasive form of sexual coercion in this study, as well as peer pressure and a victim’s own sense of an obligation.
It's possible they never explicitly refused the advances based on peer pressure or obligation.
They use examples of their categories:
To differentiate sexual coercion from possible incidents of child abuse, the survey instructed students not to include experiences with family members. Examples of coercion included “My partner threatened to stop seeing me” for verbal; “My partner encouraged me to drink alcohol and then took advantage of me” for substance; “My partner threatened to use or did use a weapon” for physical; and “My partner has tried to interest me by sexually touching but I was not interested” for seduction.
The statements about passive peer pressure come from the participants own descriptions of times they felt coerced and apparently not part of the questions that were asked.
[–]Faryshta2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
so what? how is that relevant.
if i lend someone money then he start to steal it from me its still thief
What? Did you mean if you lend someone money and he doesn't pay you back it's still stealing? I don't know what you're implying with your analogy. But rejection does matter with sexual coercion. It's the difference between rape and a mistake.
[–]auronvi-1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
And yet there is still rape...
[–]oneiorosgrip10 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Most people don't steal, and yet there is still theft.
Most people don't kill others, and yet there is still murder.
Most people don't drive drunk, and yet there are still DUI accidents and deaths.
Most people pay their taxes, and yet there is still tax fraud.
Most women don't beat their kids, and yet there is still child abuse, committed more by women than by men.
This Harvard study found that the majority of male on female rape was committed by a tiny percentage of the male population. Of their entire sample, even when asked in ways designed to garner more "yes" answers, only 6% confessed to behaviors that qualified them to be called "rapist." Ninety-six percent of that group's perpetration was attributed to 4% of the overall sample size, who also admitted to a high percentage of other violence.
Following "most guys would stop at the first indication" with "and yet there is still rape" isn't very solid logic.
[–]Faryshta1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not just that, checking the facts is 'blaming the victim'
'Did you drin anything before the act?' Is a completely valid question, someone could have dropped something on the drink. Yet feminists treat it as if making the question were rape on itself
[–]sRazors969 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I would be pissed if someone just went up to me and touched my breast, but i do think that groping someone who is fully clothed on the chest equals sex offender is kind of stupid.
[–]joeydeuce6 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
wat?
[–]garblegarble126 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I feel that 'autistic rights' should be kept separate from this sub.
Hi feminist here, I think an autistic kid who doesn't know better should be prosecuted if he impulsively touches a woman's breast - said no feminist ever. Sometimes I hate this sub.
Yeah, this is a little ridiculous.
1) This is story posted on tumblr. There is zero substantiation. Every single story could be entirely fake.
2) The picture suggests that a 4 year old autistic kid would be registered as a sex offender for touching a woman's breast. Unless someone can link me something that says otherwise, I call bullshit. No jurisdiction would do that, and no feminist would advocate for it.
3) The story about the autistic kid has nothing to do with the picture above. It's a story about a kid getting bullied by girls, and then responding with physical violence. Neither the girls, nor the kid, were in the right. Bullying is bad. Attacking people when they tease you is bad.
Oh, and the kid didn't get expelled. So... where's the outrage? And why are we looking at the picture when it has nothing to do with the story?
What is this even trying to imply? That women are cunts? 'cause that's all I am seeing this post as trying to do. And if that's so - why is this on Men's Rights, and why is it the top post of the front page?
[–]JerfFoo1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I really think the social-justice threads should do a little more to filter out attack-submissions, like this, that're targeted at other social-justice subreddits.
[–]blueoak90 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"What is this even trying to imply? That women are cunts? 'cause that's all I am seeing this post as trying to do."
No. That white knights hate men.
[–]JerfFoo0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I....I don't even....What is this?
[–]paket2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
said no feminist ever
Perhaps not, but they do advocate vociferously for zero-thought tolerance programs that would ensure that it would happen.
[–]shirleyucantbserious2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Source?
[–]paket5 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Of what? Feminists advocating for zero-tolerance programs?
[–]TheAmazingTomato4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"but they do advocate vociferously for zero-thought tolerance programs that would ensure that it would happen."
Yes actually, we'd like a source for this information that you seem to be pulling out of nowhere.
"Sometimes I hate this sub"
Sand sometimes you show your ignorance of feminism. Never heard of "rape culture" and how men are all drooly over women's bodies all the time? Never heard the "no means no" mantra? Never heard men called "creeps" over much less than actually touching a breast?
Are you actually trying to get us to believe the mob with the torches and the pitchforks is going to make any distinction or care that the kid is not neurotypical?
[–]Sp1nyNorman-3 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Not all feminists talk like that. Most feminists are normal people who want equality, if this sub wants to get anywhere maybe it should do some activism, working with feminists, rather than just complaining about them.
[–]SpanishGuy2 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
There is a related story too:
Liv here, with another high school story and how it relates to this;
As you all may know, my high school was fucking sketchy and skeevy. It was full of hicks and in the middle of a fucking field. The closest thing to it was a run down museum and church, a useless fire hall, and a DIRT FLOORED CONVINIENT STORE WITH AN INDOOR OUT-HOUSE. Let that sink in for a minute.
That being said, all the kids were pretty much the normal fucking high school kids; jackasses with no sense of style with bullying around every corner.
One day I was sitting in my Science 30 class and we heard tittering. Anyone who has ever been in a high school knows that “tittering” is the sound that stupid teenage girls make when they laugh en mass. It echoed down the hallway for about a minute. Then it grew into real laughter, followed with some comments (that we couldn’t hear) and grunting.
Suddenly screaming.
Do you know what happened?
Five grade ten girls had cornered an autistic boy (he was on my bus and was a friend of mines younger brother) and were picking on him—pushing him, hitting him, calling his names. After minutes of this going on (keep in mind we could hear the laughter when it started) he finally snapped and grabbed one of the girls and picked her up by the neck and slammed her against the wall for a few seconds (screaming ensued) and then ran away while they were freaking out.
He almost got expelled. A mentally handicapped boy who was being picked on by five girls who though it was funny that he’s retarded almost got expelled for defending himself. He didn’t know that choking is really bad. He just wanted them to stop, and lashed out.
But do you know why he almost got expelled?
The girls stated that he groped the girl he slammed against the wall before he ran away, EVEN THOUGH THE WHOLE INCIDENT WAS CAUGHT ON SCHOOL CAMERAS AND NO SUCH THING OCCURED. The girl, and all her friends, claimed that he sexually assaulted her, when he didn’t, in an attempt to get back at him. They claimed he was a threat to the safety of students, and it was a huge thing. The boy who did it literally had no clue what was going on, he had to deal with people pushing him more and calling him names, until the school cracked down and told everyone that those girls were liars and it never happened.
This picture actually made me almost cry because it reminded me of that boy on my bus and how he was a victim, even when he was made out to be a villian.
It's from heroinfriday
(Tumblr "repost and add" format is the fucking worst format I've ever seen in the fucking history of text formats. Duh!)
[–]SuB_Z7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
convenient store with an outhouse
school cameras
I call bullshit
[–]orsini11383 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
tumblr
well that was the first sign
[–]Marx0r0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
I'm not denying that a similar event could occur, but this specific one reeks of /r/thathappened.
[–]Number3572 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
He should add to the end of that sign "...even if he's 12 years old when he does it." It's absurd that kids are placed on the sex offender registry for life.
[–]Akesgeroth0 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
Okay, this? This is bullshit. Your kid being autistic doesn't excuse his behavior. It explains it, but it doesn't excuse it. If he were to impulsively punch or strangle people, he would undoubtedly be judged a danger to society, same goes for fondling people.
I know it's hard for a parent to deal with the fact that their child is disabled, but the moment you begin accepting their aberrant behaviors, you begin favoring those aberrant behaviors.
[–]scolionophobics-1 point 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link
"grows up and impulsively touches a woman's breast..." haha. Whooffff, youre right. Scrap feminism. Tell them to go back to the drawing board. Lets go back to the 1500s cause this kid will touch breasts. I can tell just from the picture.
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]IS44109 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j49 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]breakneckridge15 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]jcea_4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]RIP_BigNig-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]scemcee-8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]FallenMatt7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]seandamiller5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak921 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]occupythekitchen16 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Blindocide5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]starbuxed1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak95 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]DukeMaximum9 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sharou7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Aatch8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Popeychops1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]occupythekitchen4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]knowless1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]occupythekitchen3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]iethatis4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Blurgas3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]chavelah63 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak913 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]MIXEDGREENS4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JerfFoo2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]LemonDropLollipop5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tactsweater4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sebatron25 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]liquid_j2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]tactsweater3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]occupythekitchen3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]oneiorosgrip6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NiceIce1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zosimasie2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NiceIce-5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zosimasie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NiceIce-4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zosimasie0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NiceIce-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zosimasie0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]NiceIce-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Zosimasie1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]29 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Professor_Yaffle11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]IS447 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]KngpinOfColonProduce5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SnowyGamer12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]killbasasausage12 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bartab1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]killbasasausage1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Bartab-2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]kahow11071 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]ArnoldSnail11 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]damnBcanilive10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue8 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]typhonblue2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Faryshta2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]raesmond1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]auronvi-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]oneiorosgrip10 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Faryshta1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]sRazors969 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]joeydeuce6 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]garblegarble126 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–][deleted]3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JerfFoo1 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak90 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]JerfFoo0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]paket2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]shirleyucantbserious2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]paket5 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]TheAmazingTomato4 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]blueoak91 point [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Sp1nyNorman-3 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SpanishGuy2 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]SuB_Z7 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]orsini11383 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Marx0r0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Number3572 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]Akesgeroth0 points [recovered] | Copy Link
[–]scolionophobics-1 point [recovered] | Copy Link