Dem resolution warns climate change could push women to ‘transactional sex’

Reddit View
May 1, 2013

Post Information
Title Dem resolution warns climate change could push women to ‘transactional sex’
Author redpillschool
Upvotes 6
Comments 16
Date 01 May 2013 08:48 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit TheRedPill
Original Link
Similar Posts

Red Pill terms found in post:
the red pill

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points  (1 child) | Copy

All women already engage in transactional sex ~

[–]5F42DE47BC4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

Seriously. They fuck you until they get the ring. Then they wait around until it's time to cash in the marriage.

[–]Endorsed ContributorSarcasticus14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy

Several House Democrats are calling on Congress to recognize that climate change is hurting women more than men

Climate change, affects the entire earth disproportionately but women hardest hit. rolls eyes

In a statement to The Hill, Lee said women are critically underrepresented in the development of climate change policy.

Because most women don't want to be scientists.

The resolution calls on Congress to recognize the effects on women, and to use "gender-specific frameworks in developing policies to address climate change."

Huuuwhaat? I assume this is code for, "climate change tax on men to benefit women" - because what else could it be? That's just about what every other 'gender-friendly' policy does.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children) | Copy

These twats just do not give up.

[–]delta_hedge6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

My resolution will affirm the commitment to include and empower women in economic development planning and international climate change policies and practice

is this a FUCKING JOKE? these degenerated human beings are seriously trying everything to make men the cotton picking people of the 21st century, while the female overlord feeds them a handful of rice each day.

the only reason there are not any propositions to deport men to ausschwitz-like camps is that they know they need them as slaves in order to survive.

[–]pirateundies6 points7 points  (1 child) | Copy

"Dear women, if you don't vote for our laws that may or may not fix global climate change... well... you might look like whores. And you don't want people to think you're whores, do you?"

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

"I'm usually don't do stuff like this with guys I just met..." - famous last words ~

[–]Endorsed ContributorrebuildingMyself2 points3 points  (1 child) | Copy

If it takes female-victimization to get this fucking white knight culture behind climate change, so be it. We can mop up the feminist propaganda later.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

clever... they know exactly what they're doing! you either support climate change research, or else you support impoverished prostitution... and they will buy it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

What the fuck

[–]TRP VanguardWhisper1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

They could always just do farm labour like the men would be doing. How do they think the men would be getting those resources they would be trading to the women for sex?

Let's face it, if a woman can do anything a man can do, then a poor woman has all the options a poor man has, plus one.

And if poor women keep choosing sex for money over work for money, then the conclusion we are driven toward is that whorin' beats workin'.

[–]abovefate1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy

"[poor women] may be vulnerable to situations such as...early marriage that put them at risk for HIV, STIs, unplanned pregnancy, and poor reproductive health."

EARLY MARRIAGE is a problem and it can lead to STDs? What kind of backwards logic is this?

[–]16 MGaiusScaevolus2 points3 points  (0 children) | Copy

Well... add another tick to the pro global warming column.

In all seriousness, This is what bothers me about the American Left. It has been almost entirely co-opted by feminism. Being a straight male and an American Democrat is colossally stupid and counter to your interests. (if you're pulling a Frank Underwood and using the stupidity of others to get to the top, that's different entirely) In my work (politically related) I can say that there are very few Democrats I respect as men.

[–]nouveaugosse0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

It just sounds like typical democrat drivel to me.

[–]5F42DE47BC0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

lol, if they think they're going to continue to have their SJ feminist paradise after climate change and peak oil happen they are in for a surprise. Nobody's going to give a shit about your rights when they're just trying to get food and water for the day. You think this is a rape culture? See what happens when there's no police anymore because governments all went bankrupt fighting over scraps.

Liberal democracy is something that only happens when there's lots of extra time and money around. After the world turns to shit sorry, we're all screwed.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy

oh lord, this reminds of that Onion article about "comet strikes town, hundreds injured, but women suffered the most." i can't seem to find it though...

it's quite sad that the left has to resort to propaganda and false dichotomies like this to combat the rampant science denial and paranoia in the U.S., because the ecological disasters we're facing are real. they only got feminism/female victimhood involved in this issue as a last resort because the scientific community is treated with suspicion by so many Americans. i have to blame America's anti-intellectualism here.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2021. All rights reserved.

created by /u/dream-hunter