Pockets(or lack thereof) are holding women back

Misteralcala · 2014-10-04T22:47:43+00:00

Nobody's stated the obvious, so I will:

Women's jeans don't have pockets because women prefer skin-tight pants that hug their ass and show off their curves. There would simply be outrage if "stuff" in their pockets bulged and protruded, ruining their sexy look. Many women wear pants so tight they have to lie down and wiggle them on like escaping from a straight jacket in reverse.

kanaduhisfruityeh · 2014-10-04T22:35:15+00:00

Women already have a penis pocket between their legs. How many more do they need?

Just_Brad · 2014-10-05T00:18:24+00:00

Do not link to jezebel

Please use this to avoid giving Jezebel ad revenue.

Is this satire? I genuinely can't tell anymore.

IVIaskerade · 2014-10-05T01:08:54+00:00

Oh gosh, I just wish that women had something that they could use to carry all of their stuff around thanks to the gratuitous lack of pockets. Perhaps some sort of bigger-on-the-inside abomination of leather and chrome that was ridiculously overpriced and yet still manages to look tacky because somebody had the bright idea to have it in a gaudy shade of vomit? It's amazing that nobody has created this yet!

91239477348238942983 · 2014-10-05T19:49:46+00:00

I'm sorry, but is the economy no longer controlled by supply and demand? You think that if women as a collective just said fuck it to pants with poor pocket design that those types of pants would still exist? I doubt it.

Do you know what happens if I try on a pair of pants that can't hold, at minimum, my phone, wallet, and keys? I put them back on the shelf. Do you know why? Because otherwise I will be oppressed and not able to compete with my other male counterparts (or even females with exceptionally big pant pockets).

Actually no, it is because I need that shit with me on a daily basis. But for most women they can actively make the decision "oh I will keep my phone, wallet, keys, etc in my purse and simply carry it with me" and then purchase the pants. They are the ones who are directly contributing to the oppression and continued lack of progress experienced by women. Once this pant epidemic is remedied all women everywhere will be liberated and recognized as equals.

I guess the clothes really do make the man.

sir_wankalot_here · 2014-10-04T22:40:22+00:00

It gets better and better. Look bitch if you want pockets on your pants, either sew some on there, or buy men's pants.

SillyAmerican · 2014-10-06T15:06:41+00:00

Ah I see. So a fashion statement (no pockets) chosen by its consumers (women) is being distributed in the market by its designer and vendors (mostly women targeting women) and its a conspiracy by men to hold women back? Makes sense.

LeggyBlueEyes · 2014-10-05T05:07:18+00:00

I am now more stupid having read that. Thanks. :/

Title	Pockets(or lack thereof) are holding women back
Author	tcts
Upvotes	7
Comments	17
Date	October 4, 2014 10:00 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2ib5jv/pocketsor_lack_thereof_are_holding_women_back/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/pocketsor-lack-thereof-are-holding-women-back.22364 https://theredarchive.com/post/22364

Comments