TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Guy tells feminist he prefers younger women, so she uses SCIENCE to explain that men have a biological clock too!

ChadThunderdick

July 24, 2014
24 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Guy tells feminist he prefers younger women, so she uses SCIENCE to explain that men have a biological clock too!
Author

ChadThunderdick

Upvotes 24
Comments 41
Date July 24, 2014 1:00 AM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2bjv8y/guy_tells_feminist_he_prefers_younger_women_so/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/guy-tells-feminist-he-prefers-younger-women-so-she.228989
https://theredarchive.com/post/228989
Red Pill terms in post
feministthe red pill

Comments

[–]BoyMeetsHarem 50 points51 points52 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

TIL that my natural attraction to beautiful young women reveals my "commitment to ageist misogyny."

Lol. Old hags gonna hag.

[–]Sunshinelorrypop 13 points14 points15 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I bet when she was young, she only dated guys her age...

[–]JackPallino 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He should have just been forthright with his response, in that he finds old ass women unattractive. I mean she hamstered his simple preference up to full blown misogyny anyway. Then make her feel like the stupid cunt she is with a little A&A tossed in: "Yeah I don't think men deserve preferences of any kind, especially sexual ones."

[–]rpkarma 24 points25 points26 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Holy christ is her writing style annoying. "Um, do you even PubMed?" LOLOLOL

It's like she wants to be perceived as a teenager.

[–]farbenwvnder 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah seriously, I can't take anyone starting a WRITTEN sentence with "Umm, .." serious anymore

[–]ModAerobus 23 points24 points25 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Men do have a biological clock as well. After 35, our sperm degrades in quality. Anyone who denies this IS denying science.

This fact has no bearing on men's sexual preferences, however. Men still want to mate with younger women, regardless of their age. Period.

[–]DrXaos 8 points9 points10 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed, why would this make a difference for men's preferences as opposed to women's?

Do 45-ish divorcees still yearn for wealthy tall men?

You betcha!

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

All the more reason to knock up a girl with healthy eggs over a hag that will struggle to bring a kid to term or risk greater complications.

[–]wsdfe 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This only lends credence to why men prefer young women. Their eggs are far better at repairing damaged sperm than older women's eggs.

[–]ImBloodyAnnoyed3 points 11 years ago [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link

Well they don't repair anything, but you're right, any potential damage is minimized, not compounded

[–]wsdfe 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Uh, yeah they do. Oocytes and early embryos can both repair DNA damage in sperm.

[–]Endorsed Contributorleftajar 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. Her whole "article" is a moot point. Whether I'm 25 or 85, my best shots lies in inseminating a young female.

[–]Endorsed ContributorFLFTW16 18 points19 points20 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I won't use science. I won't try to use reason or logic. I will merely respond with revulsion: EWWWW!!!! GROSS!!! OLD SAGGY TITTIES!!! Stop trying to control men's sexual attraction. YOU DON'T OWN MENS' BODIES SO STAHP TRYING TO OWN US.

[–]pjleo85 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Goes right back to the the theory that feminism is just one big shit test for society. You can't take anything these fuck nuts say seriously. Just laugh, roll your eyes and move on.

[–]Max_Cash 8 points9 points10 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Next up on Going Dutch Redpiller uses SCIENCE to explain that women have wallets too!

[–]2Overkillengine 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, we do, it's just that we get a clock with more hours left on it than they do.

[–]sparker44 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

I dont like that they argue that an older woman can still have a baby. I never met a dude that only wanted one child. The stats the toss should be their chances of having 3-4 kids.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Older women still can have a baby, even several babies. Generally after $40k worth of in-vitro. Then, the guy gets a heart attack when over 55 and trying to keep a teenager in line.

[–]BoyMeetsHarem 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Your second sentence speaks to the argument that men should become fathers earlier, not that they should avoid old women for procreation. (I'm not arguing in favor of getting post-wall women preggo btw.)

Personally, I think with smart lifestyle choices and maybe some well placed testosterone replacement therapy a guy should be able to have children well into his 40's and still feel youthful enough to keep up with teens when the time comes.

Edit: Great username by the way, although I might have chosen Tantalus if you're referring to taking the pill

[–]ChadThunderdick 7 points7 points7 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Most men don't need any therapy to father kids well into old age. Yes your sperm count falls as you age, but you only need 1 to fertilize that egg.

James Doohan (Scotty from Star Trek) fathered a kid at 80.

And then there's this guy: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218588/Ramjit-Raghav-Worlds-oldest-dad-does-96-does-sex-times-night.html

The fear of older fathers having deformed/retarded kids is way overblown.

[–]BoyMeetsHarem 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think you missed the context of my comments - /u/NoLongerSisyphus was talking about trying to raise teenagers as an older man, nothing about sperm quality at conception. I agree with you, no reason to fear making a healthy baby at any age for men, my only concern would be my ability to adequately participate in their lives as a father once I got too old (60+.)

[–]Senior Contributorexit_sandman 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And then there's this guy: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218588/Ramjit-Raghav-Worlds-oldest-dad-does-96-does-sex-times-night.html

Don't want to be a killjoy here, but I bet the guy is nowhere close to 96 - it's rather just a result of the "rural areas in developing countries don't have proper birth registers"-effect. He's probably closer to 70 than to 90.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Tantalus would have been a good one. I guess it was a choice between no longer being thirsty, and no longer doing the same thing over and over and expecting a better result.

[–]tallwheel -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, and a beta male can still impregnate a woman. What's their point?

[–]ltCameFromBehind -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Another issue is that young women tend not to marry men over a certain age. You can always point to exceptions but in 95% of marriages the man is not more than 10 years older than the woman and most commonly they are within 3 years of each other. So if you're 40, you are not going to snag a woman under 30.

[–]manslutalt 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

most commonly they are within 3 years of each other

Yeah, with the man being the oldest of the two, not the other way around.

From the article:

We're all in our late 20s

Which means that guy wanted a woman no more than 10 years younger than himself. Which is statistically pretty fucking normal.

[–]ltCameFromBehind 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

You seem upset. I pointed out a factual statistic that shows that you can look for younger women but not too young and this has upset you. Weird.

But the important part is that if this guy is looking for a woman who is more than 3 years his junior, he's already self selected himself out of the majority of likely relationships. There's nothing wrong with it as long as he understands that and doesn't hamster away why he as a 28 year old is just as likely to snag a 19 year old college student as another college student. Statistics say no.

But if you want to believe that getting a woman 8 years younger is statistically normal, there's plenty of free hamster wheels. Out of curiosity, how old are you?

[–]__ROOSTER__ 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We here are not statistically normal. It's easy to get younger women.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I made my friend aware of these facts and he seemed unmoved. It seems that men like my friend are so committed to ageist misogyny that they're willfully overlooking recent scientific evidence contradicting their conventional wisdom that older woman = less likely to have "healthy" babies or any babies.

Tumblr is leaking.

discovered while researching for her book The Impatient Woman's Guide to Getting Pregnant that this statistic was based on data from 17th-19th Century birth records from France.

Yup and all the great minds on the subject say it is still accurate. Hence why it is still used.

Perhaps we shouldn't be choosing our mates and basing our reproductive decisions based on this extremely outdated study? Let's see, how about this one from Dunson et al. published in 2004 showing that 82% of women ages 35-39 became pregnant within one year. That's quite a jump from the 66.67% chance based on the data from hundreds of years ago. To put this statistic in perspective, 86% of women ages 27-34 will become pregnant within one year, so there is not such an astronomical difference in fertility between women younger and older than 35 after all.

Umm, no. It states, and I quote. "The percentage infertility was estimated at 8% for women aged 19–26 years, 13–14% for women aged 27–34 years and 18% for women aged 35–39 years."

Or put another way; a woman in her late 20s has nearly twice the chance of infertility a woman in her late 20s has. This is for INFERTILITY, eg, not going to have a baby, ever. At least not without severe medical intervention.

Furthermore, even if decreased fertility with age is still that much of a concern for you in light of these statistics, have you never heard of fertility treatments? Inability to conceive is a potentially fixable problem, much more fixable than ageist misogyny seems to be...

Uhh, yeah. Because someone wants to throw down their life savings so they can have a downs baby. Then get a second mortgage so they can try for one that is viable.

Men also have a "biological clock"

Irrelevant, this is about him a late 20s male trying to have the best chance to have his own offspring.

Let me tell you a story...over a year ago, I received this news alert from the New York Times:

That fathers over 40 increase autism risk by 2%? How does this affect a late 20s male looking for a woman to knock up in the near future? LOGIX HUW DUX IT TWERKZ?

Sorry, bro, but you're running out of excuses for your ageist misogyny. If fertility issues and birth defects were that much of a concern for your family planning, you would have discovered early on in your Google search that your biological clock is ticking, too.

Yes, that is exactly why your late 20s male friend is looking for a partner to procreate with now and not in his 40s. HUEHUEHUEHUEHUE

TL;DR

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's what you end up with when you are not righteous and truthful about your opinions towards women: A big bunch of hamstering bullshit to justify the denial of truth to herself.

I mean: Come on! "I don't want to date and fuck older women, because they cannot get pregnant that easy."... thought no man ever.

I don't need biology to explain why I prefer younger women:

  • Her skin is better.
  • Her tits are perkier.
  • Her ass is firmer.
  • She is more flexible.
  • Chances are that she didn't swallow more than 1/10 of the cocks you did.
  • Chances are better, that she didn't already start to ride the carousel and might turn out LTR worthy.
  • She doesn't bore me with solpisistic monologues in the length you do.
  • She doesn't annoy me with constant nagging.
  • She doesn't have a clipboard with a checklist of what qualities in a man she thinks she is entitled to.
  • Chances are she is still submissive.
  • She is way more fun to hang out with because she still is open to new things.
  • She is more open to my teaching and doesn't think that she knows all.
  • Chances are she is still open to self-improvement.
  • She doesn't think she is entitled to twenty candlelight dinners with five courses and corresponding wines at a three michelin star restaurant, where she will harass me with her bragging about her worthless lifetime achievements, before "allowing" me to lick her pussy, but will happily go with a burger and a beer, pay for herself and suck my dick until I loose conciousness afterwards.
  • Chances are she didn't turn into a feminist, vegan atheist yet.
  • She's a rising star while you are a fading colour.
  • She doesn't want to get pregnant.
  • ...

You suck, she doesn't. Get over it.

[–]Misteralcala 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Congrats! You win this thread!

Seriously thought, don't show this to any old feminazi women or you will be treated to a grisly spectacle as their hamsters burn their clutches, spinning for traction against this hard, cold truth. Their eyes will bulge, then glaze over while their mouth works silently, trying to form words but failing because the hamster is in hyperdrive, pouring through their entire life's inventory of feels to come up with the right words.

In fact, it is a very real possibility that they may be struck blind or at the very least lose bowel and bladder control as their realities come shattering down around them in millions of mirrored shards that reflect them as they truly are.

Edit: If you DO decide to show them, just breathe through your mouth, pretend not to notice their meltdown and leave the scene before paramedics arrive.

[–]Endorsed Contributorvandaalen 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

old feminazi women

I'm pretty open about this. I seriously ran out of fucks to give to bother arguing with them. I will sometimes do solely for my amusement, but never on a serious basis. These discussions will usually also include statements by me like "You need to face the truth. We (men) are just better than you (women).". I will be very calm and speak slow. A little bit like talking to an authistic child. Always fun to watch them going on full tilt.

Any conversation about this with younger as well as older (the oldest was 50, but is from Poland) but sane women will always end in them fully agreeing. They often burst out laughing because of me being so open about the topic and because of the way I act and talk. I can talk myself into rage pretty good. A little bit like Patrice O'Neal. Opposed to my behaviour towards femibitches I will let myself do this. They love it and often start to wonder "What kind of dude are you? I wonder what's going on in your head?".

I must always include a disclaimer though that I do not live in the US but in Germany. Although this country is bluepill as fuck, femipropaganda isn't expressed as aggressive as in the US.

[–]Max_Cash 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"What are we going to do about men's sexual preferences?" "Call it misogyny!" "And what about our preferences?" "Call it empowerment!"

-Feminist Board Meeting

[–]Night--Writer 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Want to know why men like younger women?

Wait for it...

wait for it...

Because they're younger.

[–]weirdnamedindian 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was thinking - since it is indeed true that men's sperm count and quality go down after the age of 35, why on earth would a man who wants to settle down around that age want to make babies with a woman his age or older? Think about it - wouldn't the man want a younger woman, precisely because her eggs are healthier compared to women his age and older, whose eggs are as worn down as his sperm.

If anything, the man is making the logical decision to get his sperm the best eggs, precisely because his sperm now at his age, need the best chance possible to create a new life.

What is the point of risking his worn down sperm with worn down eggs for?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its a really worrying statement of the times in which we live where we're literally not allowed to imply that being disabled is a bad thing any more.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He gave her a nice answer to not enrage her. I would have said when gravity vs a woman's body gravity wins eventually.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Atleast shes references her work.... But anyone can get information to portray a certain viewpoint easily.

But her childish behavior at the ends doesn't not help her argument .

[–]CptDefB 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I read the article in the voice of a teenager, and this song came to mind....

As I read amused, I continued to think, "You're totally missing the point, but go on..."

And all the while I heard, "And what about this, huh?!? And this too?!? And how about this?!? Yeah, suck on that science you ageist misogynist."

If women can be employed for this shit, I can plan/execute retirement by 50, easy.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminists can try changing the world all they want, but they will never be able to change the fact that men will ALWAYS find younger women more attractive than older women.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

get your sperm frozen. problem solved.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter