Feminism is the butt of an ironic joke it has played on itself. Thanks to liberation, smart women don't have kids and because of this future generations of women will get progressively dumber and less capable as natural selection pushes for greater sexual dimorphism in intelligence.

GaiusScaevolus · 2013-08-07T20:45:30+00:00

A lot of smart men aren't having kids either. A wife, kids, all that, are a poor investment financially and legally. The smartest men I know under 35 are confirmed Puerarchs, and I doubt that's just a coincidence.

Idiocracy will be seen as prophetic in 100 years.

empyblessing · 2013-08-07T22:37:41+00:00

That's not how evolution works, a dumb woman can have a dumb daughter or a dumb son, it won't make women dumber, it will make everyone dumber.

tallwheel · 2013-08-08T02:52:09+00:00

What a dumb article. I can't believe even The Guardian would publish this drivel.

lefo1340 · 2013-08-07T20:47:48+00:00

Men won't commit to women because of the risk of paying child support, alimony, getting fucked over divorces. Women wonder why men won't commit. Women get told "Find your way, get a career, you don't need a man, take your time", they do just that, get older, have babies at a later age or not at all. Fertility rates sink and more babies are born with genetic inferiority.

Population decreases in the West, this affects the economy for better or worse. This affects the environment for better or worse.

How long until people in the mainstream actually say "You know the whole "You Go Girl!" movement that started x years ago? Turns out that's detrimental..."

Meanwhile, those women who never graduated High School with 4 kids are being supported by the government.

It's not just the women. Do smart men want to get trapped?

ComplainyGuy · 2013-08-08T00:47:32+00:00

I think this is silly and immature. Not the sort of statement a proper educated man would actually think to himself frankly.

It's difficult to see angsty teenage sentiments be upvoted on a board about being the best man you can. It's not about how bad they are, it's about how good you can become.

rap1dfire · 2013-08-08T00:51:39+00:00

Gotta love people who don't know jack about genetics talking BS about it. If intelligence ran down on families by genes, we would never even have evolved to what we are now, species wise. Albert Einstein would have been a simple man, too.

Lord_Perseus · 2013-08-07T20:24:22+00:00

Given that most of these women tend to be femcunts i take this as welcome news the sooner these bitches are removed from the gene pool the better off the human race will be as a result

empyblessing · 2013-08-08T02:23:18+00:00

It's more like the species is selectively outbreeding the feminist gene. Damn nature you awesome.

Sarahmint · 2013-08-08T06:44:17+00:00

I think it's deeper then that. The United States rewards (gives grants and wefare and social security checks) people who are disadvantaged mentally or physically or financially. Being full of charity is a great thing. But people who are successful financially are punished with high taxes (and now being shamed by various political movements).

In the long run, those who are still around will be the offspring of those that were able to have more kids.

A busy working family may not have children where an unwealthy woman may have lots of kids she does not love at all but will love them each time the welfare check comes in the mail (single mothers at low income get a certain amount per child, so each child is more money for the month). These are two extreme examples, but in the long run the population becomes the offspring of the more reproductive (who had more babies) families.

Edit: I was actually in a skype chat with someone who (ironically was a female) despised women who pride themselves as mothers. Suffice to say I left the chat because it bothered me that much.

elheretic · 2013-08-08T07:22:07+00:00

If only IQ affected reproductive success.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_son_hypothesis

When you see Jose in his minivan with 8 kids you will see that this theory definitely falls flat.

AlbinoCrocodile · 2013-08-07T22:04:56+00:00

I feel like "smart" feminist females aren't actually very smart. I see them as nerdy girls who devote themselves to learn as a way to prove their worth (ironically) since they lack being physically attractive and having a good personality.

jakethesnake76 · 2013-08-07T21:47:38+00:00

I disagree with the premiss that these feminist are the smartest girls in the room , although they sure try to claim it..So no loss if they don't reproduce.

Edit: This intelligence is rather subjective in my opinion as my sister , who was valedictorian of her class ( while i got a C average) , She is so smart she would only read her text books at the start of the year then never open again but was a 4.0 student. She is also known to drive down the road and forget to drive , just let go of the steering wheel. So i take some of this with a grain of salt.

Veritisia · 2013-08-07T20:00:04+00:00

With traditional gender roles, smart women and dumb women alike were made to have children as their primary purpose. There was no selective advantage for being dumb or smart. Ironically, traditional roles reduced negative selective pressure on smart women, while feminism accomplishes the opposite.

Thanks to liberation, child rearing can now be a secondary purpose. This has greatly lowered the fertility of capable intelligent women who are now pursing careers and becoming spinsters instead of mothers. However, there has been little downward pressure on dumb women's fertility.

What this means is that there is a negative selective pressure against intelligence in women. Given enough generations, intelligence traits in women will be suppressed.

Intelligent men do not have the hit in fertility, and very likely benefit from considerable fertility boost.

In the very long term, natural selection will push for greater sexual dimorphism in this trait. Mechanisms that suppress female intelligence without impeding male intelligence will evolve to reflect the realities of the disparate affect of intelligence on either gender's fertility.

Either that, or traditional roles will re-assert themselves given sufficient societal collapse.

junoguten · 2013-08-08T21:50:08+00:00

On the further negative side, in a single mother culture, if the mother is an absolute dumbfuck, and the kids are low regular to normal, they tend to grow up to be annoying low level bureocrats. And not even the cool, competent ones like Hermes from Futurama

2013-08-08T05:44:13+00:00

You...sir...are a gentleman and a scholar

Whisper · 2013-08-08T00:38:32+00:00

Also braver, more assertive men are declining to have children.

Comments